not that impressive

How did you do the harp pedals correctly

My only suggestion is to try to balance the sound of the Musesounds instruments, they tend to sound weird sometimes.... apart from that, wow!

Oh, gimmicky casual-bragging.

Not a pianist but i think he's not theone playing

It sounds great, really beautiful. It's accessible and easy to hear a story throughout which I really appreciate. Thank you.

Nice

Bwv 147 - Jesus, Joy of Man's Desiring. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/j9uip8mSsp6rk2w.html

Its called "The Snow Cone Song" by Liberace. It's Bach, Jesu, Joy of Man's Desiring. 😂

Very niceeeee! I love the Scriabinesque sound in the fourth movement. I saw musescore has some problems with the playback of dynamics. If you don't want that to happen, you can add some invisible crescendos and decrescendos before a dynamic change so it doesn't pop. Very good work.

Very nice, I think this would sound a lot better performed, because imo, musescore can make some things sound weird, but this is really good

Really nice, beautiful, the starting brought to my mind Satie - Je te veux. That’s the same age Lili Boulanger won her Prix de Rome competition. It wasn’t too clickbait, couple facts and I’m in curious enough. For me the 1st Mvt. had the most unique draw with its strong motives and relaxing treatment primarily, because I feel it sometimes comes down to, loosely speaking, beating the old guys at their game, and when we want to even try, but if you have your own game you don’t have to-and sir, you did in the first Mvt. Here again in the Lento I like and you seem so far to me to have shined in the slow movements, or is it just my inclination of taste, and perhaps moreover what our rushed age more demands? It was interesting and valuable to hear about your many points of frustration with the project this was, and that has dissuaded me from taking on a massive project I was in two minds about embarking upon, of a similar order. 4th of course reminded me of Scriabin’s Prometheus severally, uh but you didn’t mention that…. awkward 😅 The ending did not seem sufficiently conclusive.

This is not music.

Beautiful...Thank you for sharing. I love classical music.

Great stuff dude.

It's really really awesome!! I like it so much. As a composer myself I learnt a lot from your compositions, I'm so grateful I found this on yt. I like the 3rd movement the most.

Very impressive work! I'll have to give it a second listen now. 🙏

Sorry, but i feel this piece has so much wasted potential. The theme is haunting & beautiful, but the progression drags on sounding like its in some drunken stupor. Its also far too repetitive. Introduce some new thematic material. Im sorry for sounding so critical, but i sincerely believe the main theme deserves to be done justice. I wish i had penned something so fine.

Congrats on 200 subs.

This is incredible! G minor is one of my favorite keys.

Really nice

Piece 1: Mozart's Serenade for Strings. Piece 2: No idea, Bach? Piece 3: Wagner's Tristan and Iode? Piece 4: Definitely Dukas's Soccer Apprentince, fun one. Piece 5: Scriabin or Debussy I think. Piece 6: I'll just say Scriabin once again. Piece 7: Ravel! Piece 8: Scriabin because I'm not sure, but it sounds like someone who loves tonal colors. Piece 9: Tchaikovsky? (another random guess) Piece 10: Mozart or Hayden? Piece 11: No doubt, that was a scherzo or trio written by an Enan Chediak. How did I do?

Appreciate the warning: What the...?

It's a beauty. #justiceforsalieri

Lovely! #justiceforsalieri

Ah yes All the infinity stones together!!

absolutely beautiful. Used this to study and it worked amazingly

Is it a coincidence that every time you post I’m brushing my teeth?😂 It sounds incredible btw

The audio is bad how? I gave a few listens (once while actively following the score) and it sounds fine to me. I did notice that on measure 6, you had a crescendo from pianissimo to mezzo-pianissimo, when the last dynamic was a pianissimo, which I doubt made any difference in the playback at measure 6. If it's the bowing midway with longer notes such as the whole note on measure 30, then I'm afraid there's not too much I could suggest. One way I could think of to fix would be to bring the dynamics down one time, (mp becomes p, p becomes pp, ff becomes f, etc.) so that the playback doesn't bow so much. Another is that you could try switching from the violin 1 to the violin 2, which I've heard has less vibrato and might be the sound you're looking for. No guarantees. Optional though if you wanted, you could pan the 2nd violin to the left, 1st violin a bit closer to the middle, cello in the center, and the viola at the right. And then adjust the volume so the sound is evenly spread out for the entire piece overall. In other words, slight imbalances are alright, but should also counter-balance itself if that makes any sense. I enjoyed the Elegie by the way, I could almost connect with it emotionally. Anyways, I hope this helps. Best on your competition.

Is D minor the key of that piece?

In the mixer start by giving the viola an +6-8 point volume increase, then switch the VST of the second violin to the first violin VST. Then increase the first violin by +1 and reduce the second to -1. The cello may not need any changes but in some pieces it's beneficial to bump it as far as +4. With this kind of Mixer profile you will have naturally balanced playback and can use the same dynamics on each instrument for equal sounding volume. Use hidden tenutos when there's playback artifacts like in V1 bar 1. Use hidden accents or dynamic bumbs when shorter notes don't sound over the other instruments.

This is a pretty nice piece, and I think the suggestions by @cardboardcricket1444 would further enhance the effects you intend, such as the long cresc. to the climax and the decresc. afterwards, in addition to pizz. and tremolos to add further textural interest. About purely technical MuseScore stuff, though, I have two tips on how to make it sound better: 1. I think changing the Violin 1 sound from the "Violin 1 solo" to "Violin 2 solo" makes a HUGE difference; Vln. 1 sounds very strained and scratchy, while Vln. 2 sounds more confident, in tune, and less "uncertain", if that makes sense. 2. Also, adding MuseFX Reverb under "Master" in the mixer adds more reverb (with an option to change it as much as you'd like), as if you are listening in a music hall, which makes a big difference. Sometimes, some pieces of music need a bit of extra reverb because, without it, they sound drier. If I remember correctly, you can find this in the Muse Hub, under Effects. I do these two steps on all my chamber music pieces, so these are just my preferred options, but let me know if you try these out and if they work better for you!

I’m not the best at writing for strings, but I think some pizzicato would add some interest to the entire piece. Maybe also a few tremolos leading up to the climax? Currently it’s very, very, very pretty, but a lot of it is just held chords, and some diversity could make it more interesting. I don’t know the rules, but also a few solos could be cool (maybe the violin and the fellow having a melodic conversation of something?). The playback sounds great btw

What happens if you like your own video? Is that like a thing or does KZfaq just ignore it?

Are you sure this is playable?

the beginning sounds good but as sone other people have already pointed out it sounds a bit messy so it makes it difficult to put attention on the notes with that amount of noise. I'll be waiting for you to post the next revision on "Tonic Composers" so that I can take another look at it.

I ain’t a pianist, but that was good; prob got the feeling you were looking for with all that swirlyness; nice

I really enjoyed it! if I could say some things it would be: When the string has melody and brass has harmony, brass at same level of dynamic as strings will cover it. I suggest one dynamic less in this scenario. I see that this witten with pairs of 2 for brass and winds. It is a bit unusual to have 3 clarinets and bassoon out of the blue when the other instruments and their auxiliary being a doubling.

No, it's not too hard. The vast majority of concert pianists would be able to perform this. There are echoes of Rachmaninoff, but there is an individual voice emerging as well. However, for a first movement, more development and length is really needed. It's all over too quickly. I know that's easier said then done, but I'm reminded of the number of times I've had to add whole passages into my scores when I realized that everything was over all too soon. It takes so much time and hard work to write this stuff, and because of that it's so easy to overlook the real length that's needed for sunstance, if you know what I mean. As someone has already mentioned, the Musescore playback doesn't do the piece justice. It's a pity that Musescore didn't adopt NotePerformer

its very reminiscent of Rachmaninoff piano concerto 2

Yeah yeah, also I think you made a mistake in the blue text. So check that out.

In my mind it will be better if your add pianissimo/mezzo piano for orchestra when the piano enters (page 2) and during the dialog with flute (page 4) ... The next parts are well balanced.

Oh my, the Musescore balance makes it not easy to listen to. I really like the piano part!

Very good, I’m so amazed