Merely vibing down there

What? Genesis doesn't say how God creating animals. It doesn't say that they were all created as adults.

@@jjoesmith331 so you think the egg of the animal came first?😬

@@manilabry8 the Bible doesn't say either way. It doesn't give an account of biological origins.

Sadly I haven't heard from this guy in a while. Don't think he'll respond

@@endygonewild2899 probably. Worth a try though.

@@MrJimMac yep

I was raised Baptist. I bailed, and joined the Catholic Church. So true! Gotta go high church. Sorry about your family. Mine didn't respond _that_ badly, but I'm pretty sure they still think it's a phase. 🤷🏼‍♂️ It helped that my father's side is predominantly Lutheran, which (despite his problems with the Church!😜) still ended up closer to Catholicism than Low-Church Evangelicalism, so my grandparents and aunts and uncles didn't find it that shocking.

@@MeanBeanComedy I'm glad you found a home. I'm happy enough in my Baptist church, I could easily leave I just think it's better for my family if I stay. I would like to start implementing the Catholic disciplines in my life though. I think it would help my spiritual growth. I might not pray a rosary but definitely fasting and prayer to God on a regular basis.

Why wouldn't the passage mention the sauropod's neck which is its most obvious feature? Also, sauropods were meant to feed on tree tops - even its teeth are made to shred leaves because they could not chew. Anything that eats grass must chew and sauropods are not field grasers. Then again, in spite of the *potential* interpretation in the e video I think that even if Behemoth were a dinosaur it would not be a sauropod. The creature also seems to spend its time in solitude unlike herd-dwelling social sauropods which were often dug up having lived and left behind footprints or mass nests together. The only two reasons left to think Behemoth may have been a reptilian monster of any sorts are because it is mentioned exclusively on par with the draconian Leviathan and because its tail is compared to a cedar. Considering its tail is its primary attribute as well as the fact that is a seemingly solitary, possibly very irritable creature that displays ox like behavior feeding on grass in the wilderness I'd make a comparison to the ankylosaur more loyal to the text. Ankylosaurs had the most "extreme" tail defense of any dinosaur, they were solitary aggressive creatures that fear nothing on earth (they had to coexist with Tyrannosaurus and Triceratops out of all neighbors) and actually ate grass instead of leaves. There also seems to be a point made in Scripture about the Behemoth having extremely strong bones. This would be most obvious to Job who has to literally "behold" Behemoth visually if the creature had some sort of bone-plated armor very obvious to anyone that sees it. All ankylosaur species were wrapped in hard bone armor that is an actual part of their skeleton Even over their faces. Even the ankylosaur's eyelids were armored. Their most deadly feature was their tail (often with a club on the end). Unlike a sauropod which Job would have noticed to have a long neck, you can hardly see an ankylosaur's neck like a turtle because it is covered in armor. Look up the perfectly preserved fossil of Borealopelta - the outside was fully armored bone. An Ankylosaurus would need strength in its loins - as the passage states - to wield a heavy club from it tail. It's solitary, it chews grass like an ox, its bones are what make it impossible to kill, it uses its loins to haul a weapon and it uses tail to destroy enemies. That's more "Behemoth" than any sauropod