🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 seriously

To stop this guy from running some kids over on their way home from school, or a mother on their was home from work. Are you stupid or something?

Same. That was some funny stuff! 😂

We definitely need to add that to our list! Thank you for the request!

@@OnlyCops I look forward to seeing it. Also I'm a huge fan of The Rookie and I love your reviews. The top 3 episodes for the rookie are Season 2 episode 4, Season 2 episode 6 and the Season 4 finale in my humble opinion.

The Rookie is already starting to get into pretty muddy water as far as events, but I'm always surprised at how many random small things they get right

You'll get no arguments from me! That would have been a better way to go about the invest for sure

Thanks for the likes!

It's what the cool kids are doing 🤣

@@OnlyCops oh is that what they are? Well as a future DA I want to thank you guys for what you did

​@@Mastrivy as a future DA can you please learn the phrase "no PR bond"

Incorrect, the 2nd amendment is clear about "shall not be infringed", my issue with this dude is him pulling it out in this manner. If you don't think this would cause you (cop or not) to be in fear of SBI you're delusional

I don't know the whole story behind the video, But I would be willing to bet that the guy wouldn't have touched his gun if the cop wasn't trying to harass him. If he was threatening somebody with it or brandishing it you know doing something against the law. Then by all means to protect citizens from this guy please stop him but tell me what's the problem with open carrying a firearm? should everybody be harassed for it?

We are actually big advocates against how Terry v Ohio is implemented. Actual reasonable suspicion should be established prior to an exertion of authority or qualified immunity shouldn't be allied to officer actions. In this instance, the suspect had, just prior to this incident, pulled said pepperball gun on another person and fled. Given that's all the officers knew prior to contact (bright yellow jacket, hat, and gun) this was pretty reasonable suspicion. Said individual then producing what was believed by the victim (not the cops) to be a real firearm, I think this was actually a best case scenario for the suspect in this instance. He was treated WAY better than Roger Fortson who was actually innocent of any wrong doing.

The woman gets to decide when it's flirting and when it's sexual harassment. So should we disregard their safety too?

They didn't know it was a pepper spray gun 🤣 and they didn't mag dump so we can all be thankful for that. You've never had someone assault you with a weapon and it shows lol God bless you friend 🥰

@@OnlyCops He told them and, I reiterate, his hand was open so he wasn't gripping the gun handle and it was pointed away from them. I can tell you're a bootlicker or a tyrant yourself bc you lie about people without knowing any facts or evidence.

Though I actually believe all gun laws should be abolished, I do believe pulling a gun (or what looks like a gun) and threatening people without due curse should be illegal. The stopped individual did pull his pepper ball gun on someone prior to contact with the police and they were sent to detain him as part of that investigation. I am happy to see people taking a hardliner 2A stance, but I think it's unwise regardless to pull anything weapon looking on anyone if you value your safety

The call was not about simply carrying the gun, the call was about pointing said gun at people and threatening to shoot them. I believe they didn't stutter when they said "shall not be infringed", but I'll never excuse threats to anyone's safety, cop or not.

Cool so conceal carry now allows you to point it at innocent people.

Where and when did it say he point ed his gun, showed it anything like that. He was approached by a police officer for carrying a firearm. My comment is for the officers talking about just walking up to and frisking him. That is not how you get to treat a law biding citizen.

@@ericgruben312 did you watch the whole video or just the short?

Just the short.

You might be reading a little too much into that 🤣

@@OnlyCops No im not. I just put a porch light in waiting for sherif to drop off divorce paperwork... sitting on porch under good lighting so dude can see me since it's dark out. Not trying to get shot while my life falls apart... but when the cops show up usually when it 1 of the 2 things happen.

@@user-ej8je2co1ssounds like you’re taking out your personal life stuff on random internet people you know nothing about. Just fyi, as the one non-cop on this stream I feel very safe with these two tyrants.

What is personal about lighting my porch, so it's well lit for two law enforcement officers... O right there safety and mine... I got not getting shot is personal... lemme guess single mother raised you? That's personal.

@@user-ej8je2co1sTheir

We love you too 😊

The subject here had prior to this interaction pointed what clearly looked like a gun at victims. I believe people should be able to own tanks, just not threaten people with said tank without due cause

Let the cops make the decision FOR you!

My dude pulled that pepper ball gun on someone and fled the scene, this only captures the police catching up to him. If he was pulling this on people in Houston, they did, indeed save him from himself

Broly was a tyrant, we are only against pulling guns on people, in any context outside of self defense

You’re right cops should just ignore calls

@@tommytomatoes Oh that's right like the call that there was a guy with a gun. He was legally carrying it across his back along with his fishing Pole and fishing gear and the cops harassed him because he had his gun legally carried. Or what about the one that had the cane for blind people in his pocket and was harassed by the cops because it was a weapon. There are hundreds and hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of videos out here of ignorant a$$ cops acting ignorant is hell. You guys are improperly trained on the escalating situations or not jumping to conclusions and on properly handling yourselves when somebody gets belligerent. My favorite one is how you guys lie through your teeth making up laws that don't exist even when you're confronted by somebody who doesn't know the law you still want to double down with your stupidity.

You are conflating specific instances of police misconduct with this unrelated call in question. If these aforementioned incidents we would be calling for lawsuits and charges against the cops with actual legal teeth. In this specific call, the individual in question threatened people with the fake gun he produced to the officers and fled the scene prior to this bodycam. He wasn't guilty of having a gun, he was guilty of aggravated assault and or deadly conduct, hence he was very lucky both the victim wasn't actually exercising their God given right, and that police didn't use more force when presented with a person producing a weapon.

That's a new sexual orientation 🤣

@@OnlyCops and their mommas

Thin Bread Line.

$1 for what the elements of the offense are for aggravated assault. Possession of the (fake) gun isn't my issue here, he pulled said gun on someone prior to this incident and the officers were trying not a pull a Uvalde and actually intervene. If someone pulled a gun on you what would be your response regardless of the circumstances?

Same place as the phrase “expectation of privacy”: in case law. If you’re looking for the court case, it’s Terry v. Ohio. Since I know you won’t actually read it, here’s the relevant text from the decision: “We merely hold today that where a police officer observes unusual conduct which leads him reasonably to conclude in light of his experience that criminal activity may be afoot and that the persons with whom he is dealing may be armed and presently dangerous, where in the course of investigating this behavior he identifies himself as a policeman and makes reasonable inquiries, and where nothing in the initial stages of the encounter serves to dispel his reasonable fear for his own or others' safety, he is entitled for the protection of himself and others in the area to conduct a carefully limited search of the outer clothing of such persons in an attempt to discover weapons which might be used to assault him. [392 U.S. 1, 31] Such a search is a reasonable search under the Fourth Amendment, and any weapons seized may properly be introduced in evidence against the person from whom they were taken.” From Justice Black’s concurring opinion: “I would affirm this conviction for what I believe to be the same reasons the Court relies on. I would, however, make explicit what I think is implicit in affirmance on [392 U.S. 1, 34] the present facts. Officer McFadden's right to interrupt Terry's freedom of movement and invade his privacy arose only because circumstances warranted forcing an encounter with Terry in an effort to prevent or investigate a crime. Once that forced encounter was justified, however, the officer's right to take suitable measures for his own safety followed automatically.” From Justice Douglas’ dissent: “The infringement on personal liberty of any "seizure" of a person can only be "reasonable" under the Fourth Amendment if we require the police to possess "probable cause" before they seize him. Only that line draws a meaningful distinction between an officer's mere inkling and the presence of facts within the officer's personal knowledge which would convince a reasonable man that the person seized has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a particular crime. "In dealing with probable cause, . . . as the very name implies, we deal with probabilities. These are not technical; they are the factual and practical considerations of everyday life on which reasonable and prudent men, not legal technicians, act." Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 175 . To give the police greater power than a magistrate is to take a long step down the totalitarian path. Perhaps such a step is desirable to cope with modern forms of lawlessness. But if it is taken, it should be the deliberate choice of the people through a constitutional amendment.” In this particular case this guy fit the description of a man who threatened to shoot two people and pointed what looked like a gun, and he verbally admits to being involved in that confrontation (probable cause). Under the top standard a frisk is super reasonable before he admits, under the dissent it’s reasonable after so 🤷🏻‍♂️.

I can show you in the Declaration of Independence. LIFE, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Kinda like they put it in a certain order. Life being most important. If a person flashes a fake gun at someone and a non-officer shoots them, what then? Cause that's easily something that could have came from this.

I guess

*government officials

All people are horrible. We are all sinners in the eyes of God. Have you found Grace in your life today?

We did 🤣

@@OnlyCops before or after y'all violated someone rights😂😂😂

Arlington TX badge #3133. Never once violated anyone's rights 🤣 we spend half of these streams pointing out when they do get violated by cops lol

@@OnlyCops y'all seem like some of the good ones respect🤝

@@kennethgoines4001 respect back at ya

Almost all of these shows show WILDLY illegal things and violations of policy, tactics, and, ethics 🤣 but it makes for good drama I guess lol

Dude pulled a gun on a victim prior to this incident and fled the scene before cops caught up to him. I'm good with the suspect having a tank as a felon, he just can't go around threatening people with it without due cause

Pulling a gun out is a bad idea anywhere 🤣 it's also illegal unless you are in fear of serious bodily injury

Yes sir

🤣🤣🤣 technically it's a pepper ball laucher lol

Same 😭

They are out here playing bumper carts lol

Very cool! I appreciate the insight on how they operate and how all that is organized!

I think it due time we did something on it

I would agree with that!

That's not a bad idea!

🤣🤣🤣 we have some strong opinions at times lol

I know 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I am 34 but feel 45 😅

This really was one of the worst welfare checks I've ever had to review. The worst part is, the poor kid just wanted help, what he got was bullets. This was a painful reminder of how unprepared a lot of officers are to deal with complicated situations like these

I think this was from about a month ago