My fan isn't blowing. Not sure why that would be

All it's proof of is that the horizon hides objects beyond it. Cool, Who cares. How far is that horizon on that day? You don't even know how far the ships were let alone how far the horizon is.

Well I’ll be dipped. Thank you for saving hours.

The 'backward' PT-6 jet turboprop engine is probably the most reliable engine on earth! I'd rather fly in any airplane with one of those than two of any other kind of engine. It's an excellent reliable efficient engine! AWESOME VIDEO! ❤❤❤

Amazing explanation sir. I have a doubt that nobody clarified me related to what would happen in case of total oil pressure loss on the system. As far as i knew, the counterweights will make the prop angle to be in fine pitch in order to get the maximum performance while taking off or landing. It doesn't make sense to put the props into coarse pitch or feather cause the engine would still alive the only problem was the oil pressure of the system. So if you dont have any source of hydraulic (oil) to counteract the force of the weights, the effect would place them into fine pitch. I don't know if my thoughts are correct so if anyone can expain it to me i would appreciate it. Gorgeous video again sir !!

Beautiful! Excellent video! Excellent presentation! Thank you!

Great information thank you buddy

Why not just shorten the tube 3 inches, it will give you more room for gas, but keep the fuel level from being overfilled.

These are the same panels used in over head projectors in schools in uk. We have loads of them left over after have new flat screen tvs. Your video has kept me up all night dreaming of what I can do with them! Thank you.

❤😮

Ya man thats great i learned a lot. Thanks

Is it technically correct to say that the triple spool engine has low, intermediate and high pressure compressors if you include the fan up front?

thanks you for explanation appreciate the time and effort

thats brilliant, I knew it was a matter of lining up to the best match, but this cleared it all up, cheers

I had no idea the fit was so loose! I guess once it's running the centripetal force pulls them into alignment but still!

Nice effort but it would be even easier to understand if it is animated

Well done! In particular, knowing to read the smallest scale as 25/50/75 thousandths made everything come together to read it simply enough to do it in my head quickly. Thank you!

So hilarious to me that people run out of zoom and that tells them water is curving. Hilarious

That helped. The only problem is that the leaf spring fell out and I didn't know where it went. If anybody finds a small metal piece a bit under an inch long, find the video "Makita hammer drill replacing the leaf spring" (yes, I know that this isn't the hammer drill but that video shows the same leaf spring) and you'll know within 30 seconds. It's impossible to tell from the parts diagram. Also, your video works for anybody with a DF030D, which is essentially the same for the parts that are in the video.

Great explanation, thanks!

Thank you so much for this video. You covered every question i had.

The Gloster Meteor did have it's centrifugal engines in the wings as opposed to the fuselage.

thank you, i have been confused why axial compressors are more popular all the time, your video clear up my confusion

Oh thank god mine went off on it’s own while watching this lol

Oh thank god mine went off on it’s own while watching this lol

imagine if those turbines were made out of diamonds. it would solve centrifugal compressor problems & generators & water pumps.

I heard they take those junk turbines & repurpose them as water pumps.

Thank you so much, liked and subscribed! I will be rewatching this with my 15 year old son. This video is the very best I've ever seen this explained, you took the time to assume nothing of the viewer and carefully explained every term, measurement where they come from and how it's all put together. A+++ video! Shared also with my wife who teaches math in middle school, I'm sure she'll find this useful to highlight a real world application of the geometry she teaches. It's so much better when the math concepts aren't left to abstract rote memorization of formulas for seemingly no real purpose to the learner, rather the student can see that these concepts are in fact real in the "real world".

This is good quality !!

My brother, awesome video! When I was in the US Air Force we worked on an "air cart" which was a portable gas turbine engine that provided the compressed air to start the Turbofans on the A-10 and the T-56 Turboprops on the EC-130's we supported. It's awesome to understand the fundamentals on how that mini jet engine compressed all that air, and it was bleed air from the axial compressor section. 👍

never seen a dual sided centrifugal. that's like frank whittle's original patent design?

How best can i get this book Sir. I love the clarity of it.

Explained very clearly. Thank you very much

MY favorite RAT

Thank you. I now understand

Do you send these panels to Russia?

Which is used under mirrors??

I love you man thanks!!!!!

my Hummer h2 is doing the opposite. it stays solid but when you turn the signal on it still just stays solid and doesnt do anything else.

Comparing the 2 ships is not proof: Were they both full? Were they both empty? Was one full and the other empty? Were they the same size/design ship ? The real test is to film a ship going out to sea, preferably diagonally to the shore line (point of observation). It helps if it a calm clear day to maximize resolution/minimize haze at distance. As the ship approaches the horizon it becomes harder to see clearly. Now magnify and the ship will come back into view. Look closely at the waterline. You are not able to see it directly because of the optical noise close to the horizon at distance. However if the hull is brightly painted, you will be able to see the mirror image of the ship below the waterline. At this point if the surface of the water is still enough, you will see a region across the horizon line that is indistiguishable between the image of the hull and its mirror image below the water line. In between is the horizon line which due to shimmering cannot be focused on. The hull looks thin but it is just that you can't see the bottom of the hull because by this point it is beyond the vanishing point. Same for its mirror image (or mirage) off the water surface. But with increasing magnification it can still be brought into view. However, this cannot go on indefinitely because at a certain distance, regardless of level of magnification, there is simply too much material (air/water vapor) above the water surface (the column of air that is in the way of your optical path, ie the path light takes to get from the object (ship) to your eye or camera/detector. So there are diminishing returns in the ability of optics to resolve distant objects , but they can be viewed to great distances, especially using infrared, which is less hampered by atmospheric influences like haze. I am not saying it is one way or another for sure, but there are as many "holes" in either model. They are just not the same holes! And your video proves nothing unequivocally. Particularly, without controls, this is simply an interesting observation but certainly not the best that I have seen, by a long-shot!

A really good video. Finally I could understand some points! Thanks!!

Thank you for clearing up my doubts. Great explanation 👌

You assume modern metallurgy in your explanation. There is a documentary of a Jumo 004 restoration and it is a pain compared to the equivalent centrifugal jet engine from a meteor which is still running in its original configuration and parts as it places less demands on metallurgical quality.

Thanks for the tip.

Didn’t help at all

Great video and great information

Thank you!

Respect 🫡

What a frustrating ramble.

I plan on doing this to my 2020 ram 1500. Can this cause any damage? Is it true that your coolant needs a constant circulation?