Thank you so much Jeff :)

Couldn't agree more! :P

Nebula is almost the same size as a Galaxy class, Challenger/NewOrleans/Freedom classes are the lil ones

The internal volume of the miranda was also greater than the internal volume of the constitution as well Remember, there’s a difference between internal hull volume, and dimensional size due to arrangement/layout

You are so very welcome!

Indeed it is :)

Thank you so much Eugenio :)

It's a great design :)

@@TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics It's a though little ship. A reflection I feel of the federation of the golden age, though with a little more teeth

Little?! ;) :P

Worf: Little?

LOL I can accept that ;) :P And yes it did!

Now we need a video on the Yeager Class! :)

Lol well I like to remind AND surprise you :P

You're very welcome Dominik! And Congrats on being First to comment ;)

@@TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics thank you very much

Oh? It got your imagination going? ;)

Really good point

Short, sweet, to the point and 100% Accurate :)

@@TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics indeed.

Ship*

Cardassian*

So sorry about those spelling mistakes my auto correct keeps correcting it I will be sure to check what I write next time to prevent Giu Waisting time on several comments!sorry again 😅

You*

Post Voyager period, I think.

Only those that need it

@TriAngulum Audio Studios 👌

The Miranda may appear small, but it isnt, having more internal volume then even the Constitution Class Refit!

Well you can't please everyone!

@@TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics not a knock, they just look alil to "Forward". Awesome skin though, with great detail. Made me sad that it's not viable in STO after lvl15ish lol

What an odd comment, as it's NOTHING like the Crossfield at all LOL

LOL I get that you have a strong personal opinion when it comes to the Miranda Class, however I disagree with" one of the most beautifully proportioned ships" The Miranda is a very clunky looking design, which is a direct product of it's role in the fleet, while the Centaur Class is a sleek design again mirroring ITS role in the fleet!

@@TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics I just like how the saucer blends (reasonably) smoothly into the box structure - to the point that it looks like a extension of the same piece. _And I am willing to die on that warp core breach._ It would be interesting to see a variant on the concept with a completely smooth transition, say in the Sovereign design style, with no angles or corners on the connection so that the circle and the box are blended … … … I just realised, that's basically a old Romulan Bird of Prey flipped upside down !¿!

@@TriAngulumStudiosAudioComics "Clunky" describes the Miranda class quite well. And being clunky is what sells it to me. The Constitution-class is the shiny explorer, the pride of the fleet, the Miranda-class is the unglamourous work-horse of the fleet. The clunkiness is what makes it look the part. The Centaur-class is supposed to be the workhorse-equivalent of the shiny, pride of the fleet Excelsior-class, but - in my opinion at least - it is too sleek to look the part. It does fit the Starfleet's golden era hybris, I'll give you that, but the Centaur class feels off when I look at it. Though admittedly that's probably more due to the context than the design itself. With Miranda-class still being widely shown on screen and the Excelsior-class being relegated into the unglamourous workhorse role with the Galaxy-class (and to a lesser extent the Nebula-class) around, having yet another workhorse-equivalent of... seemed kind of redundant. . But I still like the Miranda-class better. From an out-of-universe-perspective, I think the Centaur-class is a bit of lazy design. It's well executed, but considering we saw the Miranda- and Nebula-classes as equivalents to their respective hero-ships first, it had a " oh yeah, more of the same"-vibe when I first saw it. I get the narrative function showing the workhorse sibling of the Excelsior class had. It shows that Starfleet is getting desperate enough to put aging designs of less-than-ideal-combat-worth into front-line service, but I think a TNG-equivalent of the Oberth-class would have done the same story-wise and felt less redundant. Not saying the Centaur class hasn't earned its place in Starfleet's history, but personally I much prefer designs that don't feel like "this is that era's equivalent of the Constitution/Miranda-class". To me designs that broke that mold - like the Constellation-class, feel more unique and seem to have their distinct personality and flavour - if that makes any sense.

Im sorry but you are incorrect... Improvement in design is ALWAYS necessary! Its how we evolve and learn... If not, we'd still be driving around in Model T cars and flying in 1 propellered planes... So you have this idea completely wrong!

A lot of people tend to forget that pleasing aesthetics is an important part of being human... After all, if it wasn't, we'd have boxes on wheels for cars, cube shaped ships in every Sci-Fi show etc etc