What car company is yours? Lol

IHS doesn’t do that. All they do is crash them and test their safety level. The car manufacturer is the one who builds them to be safe.

Since May 2021

I don't think it was intentional, I think KZfaq changed something.

@@bradfordjhart they also reply to comments. Def intentional

And it's game over for gas

@@SaudiOnRoblox not really lots of people still own older cars that use gas

@@SaudiOnRoblox are you happy bout that.

Is all EV cars safe

@@SaudiOnRoblox You dream. Nobody will buy second hand EVs with terrible batteries; millions of people will never switch.

It looks like some type of concrete but idk

@@ProjectEurobeat That is absolutely not concrete, thick welded steel is the answer.

@@ProjectEurobeat concrete would break after so many hits

We have some ratings for the 2021 Durango, though we are missing a few and it isn't currently on our schedule. www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/dodge/durango-4-door-suv/2021

We don't have any current plans to put the Spark through any tests. We do have some ratings for the 2016-21 model here: www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/Chevrolet/spark-4-door-hatchback/2021

I’ve seen brands like Honda that have been designing for this test for a while, in the MDX you can even open the door after the small overlap test. But there are benefits to both, the ones that slide off, can lead you into oncoming traffic in some instances or even hit another object. It’s a tough call to choose which is better, it will depend on your accident and location

What if you slide into another object after the first crash?

@@akj2387 you'll only be going ~15 miles per hour, so a lot less likely to cause injury. Secondary crashes happen, but it's a smaller percentage of overall crashes, especially dangerous left of center ones like this test simulated

There’s no hope in these test. The OEMs know precisely how the car will react. To the millimeter.

@@steveam29 that’s my point though. It appears many manufacturers have engineered their products to pass this exact test, rather than when variations inevitably happen in the real world. Contrast that with Volvo’s approach of protecting occupants as best as possible in any collision, even those without a government or insurance test. Check out their run off the road test for example.

IIHS doesn't perform full barrier tests for our ratings program, though we occasionally perform demonstration or research tests using a full impact. We run a moderate overlap (40%) test on the driver side and a small overlap (25%) on both sides of the vehicle. NHTSA does run a full barrier test.

Full ratings for the 2022 Carnival are here: www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/kia/carnival-minivan/2022

Full safety ratings for the 2021 Toyota Highlander - a TOP SAFETY PICK+ - are here: www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/Toyota/highlander-4-door-suv/2021

Is there a specific model you're interested in? We just issued ratings for two GM vehicles - the 2021-22 Trailblazer and 2021-22 Encore GX: www.iihs.org/news/detail/chevrolet-trailblazer-earns-highest-iihs-accolade

@@iihs-hldi can upload the trailblazer one?

@@iihs-hldi hello what was the rating of the honda city 2010

@@sant1agocoronando419 Maybe try looking for it at Asian NCAP. But IIHS does have ratings for the Hyundai Accent and the Toyota Yaris/Vios.

IIHS purchases our test vehicles at local dealerships. In some cases vehicles can be "nominated" for testing by automakers in order to get them prioritized. In those cases, IIHS still locates and purchases the vehicles but the automaker will reimburse the cost of the vehicle.

@iihs-hldi good on you for not giving them a chance to cheat on you by beefing up a vehicle and handing it over

very surprised it was rated good

My guess is that it has to do with the 1000+ lb battery.

Not yet. We do have plans to test the Model Y but I don't have a firm date.

We just completed our first crash test of the 2022 Santa Cruz yesterday, so stay tuned for ratings coming soon.

thats because of the load limiter. You can see from the top view the car at one point slowed down quite violently, and the load limiter is just there to smooth out the impact. If it didn't let the seatbelt out that much then the chest could've been hurt

We don't have any plans to test the Model S right now. We did just receive 4 Model Ys and are getting started on tests in the coming weeks.

@@iihs-hldi nice thanks for the info. Hopefully it will have less lower leg intrusion on driver side compared to model 3.

We have ratings coming soon for the 2022 GV70 and are also just getting started on the Pathfinder.

@@iihs-hldi ah thank you for the information 🙏🏽 I hope too see them soon I’m curious

Last time they tested a Jaguar was in 2004 💀

EVs are tested with a SoC of 12.5% (+/- 2.5%), with a minimum of 25 miles of range left in the battery.

Would have never thought to ask this. Interesting response! Makes sense to keep it relatively low in case of runaway.

Actually they aren't because the seatbelt and airbags work well together. Theres not that big of a crumple zone because they want to maximize interior space, and have a better turning circle.

@@nickbien Okay thanks! I just saw the forward motion stop abruptly when the barrier impacted the A pillar and noticed dummy's head snap back on impacting the steering wheel through the airbag and jumped to the high peak forces supposition. I guess seeing as the space under the bonnet isn't open to the cabin they could still put some deflective or energy absorbing structure in to stop the A piller being all there really is. Clearly the structure os strong enough to take the impact but not convinced the soft tissues of us occupants are quite so robust. Seat belts limit the loads to the torso - the head is unrestrained though and keeps going..?

@@rlc2978 If the head did contact the steering wheel, I think IIHS would know because at one point there would be a sudden force on the head. One car that IIHS said the head contacted the steering wheel is the model s. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nLOTqMx30q-1hKM.html The model s had the same problem as the id4 but I would say the id4 still performed better because it decelerated more than the model s before hitting the A pillar, and the head and body didn't move as far forward. And in the id4 the front wheel got out of the way immediately which helped there be less intrusion inside. The head is "restrained" by the airbags cuz thats what airbags r designed to do. Would a "deflective" structure be like in some Volvos? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gcCBabd7lda-eZs.html

this earned a top safety pick +

For 2021 models, about 91% of vehicles tested earn good ratings in the driver-side small overlap crash test. About 84% of tested vehicles earn a good rating on the passenger side.

We don't have any plans to test the Model X. We are about to get started with the Model Y, however.

Full ratings for the 2016 Honda HR-V: www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/Honda/hr-v-4-door-suv/2016

Thank you guys

The moderate overlap front crash test barrier does crumple. This test, however, is designed to replicate striking a fixed object like a pole or tree. A crash test can't capture every scenario in the real world, but are designed to replicate the forces that are common in real-world crashes.

@@iihs-hldi ok

Full ratings for the 2022 Honda Civic sedan and hatchback (both TOP SAFETY PICK+ winners): www.iihs.org/news/detail/2022-honda-civic-sedan-and-hatchback-earn-highest-iihs-award

that’s intentional

The driver dummy injury measures were all in the good range.

is it not out in the states? i see it e everywhere here in ireland

These are available. We purchased these from local dealerships. IIHS doesn't issue ratings for vehicles until they're available to the public.

AGREED!

I’m not a fan of SUVs but I like the styling of this. What don’t you like?

It looks like a blob.