🟢 Must Watch Videos: ▪ 20 Reasons Why King Charles III Will Be a Successful King ➜ kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ieCIgrdyntOvhI0.html ▪ 30 Things You Never Knew About King Charles III ➜ kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mZd2i6yAx8jdpas.html ▪ 30 Royal Rules Broken by Meghan Markle ➜ kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hpdkqLuDts7Hj30.html ▪ 30 Things Meghan Markle Couldn’t Do After Marrying Prince Harry ➜ kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rrejYLmA3K-pqHk.html ▪ 20 Reasons Why Some British Don't Want Prince Charles To Be King ➜ youtu.be

It’s really weird not to see Queen Elizabeth in the pictures.😢

Charles III is literally the King of Canada, not just the head of state. Canada has a King.

It’s prosecution not persecution! They are very different terms.

Weirdly, he already has a driving license because he passed his driving test around 50 years ago.

It's Commonwealth Realms plural not singular, he holds all those thrones independently of each other and can lose them without affecting the other like Barbados that was mentioned. England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are NOT independent nations, he is King of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Note that the first three nations aren’t referred to by name.

IN MY VIEW As an American I found this fascinating watching and learning about your new King and his duties. Thank you.

In fact under the Succession to the Crown Act only the first six people in the line to the throne need the Sovereign's permission to marry. Also most if not all Royal Prerogatives are eiher done in the Sovereign's name by the Government or on the advice of the government.

Barbados has been self governing since 1961 and has celebrated 30 November as its Independence Day since 1966 when it gained full independence.

His Majesty King Charles III did pass a driving test. He was only a prince then so he needed a license to drive.

2:40 Licence - he has the ones he got while his mother was alive and the monarch... Does not need is not the same as does not have!

If the only person who can drive without a licence is the King, or presumably a Queen as well, then chances are he has a driving licence from when he passed as the prince.

Charles went to Gordonstoun, said as Gordonstun NOT Gordonstown, which the narrators keep saying.

Also worth noting: in the 14 realms outside of the UK the monarch is represented by a Governor-General (appointed by the monarch on the advice of the relevant PM) who carries out most of the monarch's duties and powers on the monarch's behalf. As well, the monarch is represented in the government each of the provinces/states/territories of Canada and Australia by a Lieutenant Governor (although they do not hold a specific title as monarch of each prov/state/terr)

Fascinating. I did not know most of these things. Very informative and well presented. 👍🏻☮️

The King does not govern, he reigns. He is a constitutional monarchy.

The monarch doesn't own all the swans - they only own the ones on certain stretches of the Thames.

Narrator used the wrong word several times. It should be “prosecute”, not “persecute”.

Very interesting to know this kind of things thank you.

I completely agree. Queen Elizabeth was such a multi representation of war hero and grandmother also highly respected woman of dignity and honor.

The PM is CUSTOMARILY the leader of the most voted party. It is not required

I love how people keep parroting that the King and The Royal Family are merely "symbolic." Kind of like an Italian Mafia Boss appointing a "Front Boss" (Prime Minister). The Royal Family was, is, has been, and are the true power. Plain and simple. Anyone that believes anything else is very naive. They only want you to believe they aren't the true power because it takes heat off of them. Rest assured, no politician in Great Britain has more power than The Royal Family/King. At the end of the day, they control the military. Whoever controls the military has the power. Plain and simple. Any "powers" given to Parliament in recent times, believe me, are merely symbolic and simply only on-paper, but they all know who really has final say.....The Crown.

Thanks for the information.

Wow thanks for the video

In #5, you twice use PERSECUTION when you mean PROSECUTION. They mean different things.

The Monarch can choose anyone from the winning party to become Prime Minister, it does not have to be the leader of that party. However the Monarch as a general rule has appointed the leader of the winning party to be Prime Minister, but as mentioned it does not have to be. There are official websites that mention what powers the Monarch has, and the list is extensive. The above mentioned is just one of those powers.

21:00- That footage is NOT footage of the former Edward VIII's wedding to Wallis Simpson in 1937 after his 1936 Abdication. It's footage from 1923 of his next younger brother Albert, Duke of York's wedding to Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyons who'd become George VI and Queen Consort Elizabeth after the Abdication (and, yes, these were the parents of the recently deceased Elizabeth II and maternal grandparents of Charles III). George VI would die in 1952 while his widow survived as the Queen Mother until her death at age 101 in 2002! Oh, and the Queen Mother especially would have been infuriated to have been mistaken for the Duchess of Windsor who mutually detested each other!

In Australia the governor general represents the queen and now the new king .and in 1972 the governor general dismissed the prim minister and appointed the leader of the opposition as the new prime minister awaiting a new election. The famous words said by the deposed prime minister were "Well may we say God save the queen but who will save the governor general".

The Queens Representative dismissed the Prime Minister of Australia in 1974. Regards, Geoff. Reeks

Do you check your facts? The last time a British sovereign dismissed a prime minister was not in 1834, but in 1975, when the Queen's emissary in Australia dismissed a democratically elected PM by the name of Gough Whitlam. Every Australian knows this because it illustrates the reality of sovereign "reserve" powers.

Um, maybe someone should look up the difference between persecution and prosecution (wrt sovereign immunity).

Many of these things were slightly wrong. And the word you were looking for is prosecution not persecution.

The king can fire a Prime Minister! Does the rule only apply to the UK, or does Canada apply as well? Getting rid of Trudeau would certainly boost Royal popularity around here

A surprising omission here is the Crown Privilege, whereby the Sovereign can withhold information from courts, or anyone else. The Sovereign also has access to intelligence information, which the Government cannot keep from him/her. In practice it is not known how much GCHQ/MI6 skullduggery is concealed by the intelligence community, but the power of such privilege is certainly greater than many of the ceremonial powers like the never-invoked denial of Royal Assent.

He is not the King of England, nor of Scotland or Wales. He is the King of the United Kingdom. And it's prosecution not persecution. Actually, there are so many other mistakes here that to list them would take longer than the video.

Emergency vehicles in the UK are only allowed to travel 15MPH over the Speed limit on a Blue Light Run!

He is immune from prosecution, not persecution. Oy yeh.

Where did he get all those medals ! He never fought in any war

The King has also the power to ask others to take away his pen that is in his way.

His Majesty is the LAW.

They missed one when King Chuck flaps his ears he can fly.

1. Serve as King. Wow so you're telling me that the king can serve as king? I would not have guessed. You people are fucking genius!

It's not " Legal persecution" ...ITS LEGAL PROSECUTION......

😢😢 lucky you; who wouldn't want to be king. Everyone love there mom so my highest condolence to the monarch and congratulations and I pray you be a good KING.

The last time a Monarch dismissed a Prime Minister was Lord Melbourne. Gough Whitlam: "Are you f**king serious?!"

Interesting.

God has always been in control 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂

To be honest, he can probably do what he wants. Doubtful anyone would really tell him no

You do know that charles, before he became king, had taken his driving test over 50 years ago. So whether it is legal for him NOT to need a license is somewhat moot given he has one anyway.

Long life to The King. Healthy, happy and GLORIOUS

At 1:52 of the video, there is an error. The British Monarch does not govern any Commonwealth nations. King Charles III is the Head of State, yes, but he does not dictate any government policies of those nations.

Well, wasn't that revealing or rather, confirming? I'd heard long ago that the sovereign there ". . . retained all powers unto self on condition that they not be used . . . excepting for in emergencies-dire." (reconstituted from long-ago memory) Of course none others can determine such said direness but for the sovereign! Also, as cutting directly to the chase on this, the Sovereign is not above the law but rather, IS the Law per se, as intercessor posed between God Almighty and the sovereign's subjects. (These popularly believing themselves "citizens," such belief being but strictly nominal.) Fascinating and, very useful as a summing-up of the key matter. . : .

Time to open the drapes and let some light in.

A pity your editor didn't know the difference beween the Royal Arms and members of the Armed Services bearing their rifles

I'm pretty sure he at least had a drivers licence... for the longest time he was just a prince and during that time he drove a car at one point...

Sovereign immunity - what about - Clause 61 Magna Carta (1215)?

I and most others don't see things the same way as king big ears does but then again we can't shove our heads up our own backsides.

Ok I have a question I've seen it quoted here and elsewhere 'the ruling Monarch is the only person in the uk who never needs to pass a driving test' and 'Charles never had to pass a driving test' so given that he has driven in the past and wasn't the reigning Monarch the math doesn't seem to add up

Do you have any control over how many ads punctuate your video? If so, please thin it out. I love your content, but I'm bailing because it's so irritating to hit these ever few seconds.

Correction, the Prime Minister is not chosen based on the party that won a majority of seats in Parliament, it is based on the party that won a plurality of seats, i.e. the party that more seats than any other, it does not need to hold a majority of the seats. As well, parties can form a coalition to combine for a plurality.

31) king Charles III owns all pets in United Kingdom 🤗

Failed in the first minute - he's the king of Scots. He is not the King of Scotland. In Scotland, the people are sovereign

Your Majesty King Charles lll. It is written! Thou shalt arise, and have mercy upon Zion; for the time to favour her, yea,the set time is come.Ps.102:13. Amen. God save the King.

He can choose his own name. Nobody in the royal family can marry anyone without his permission. He has final say over the names of royal family members. In other words, anyone who is an HRH or the child of an HRH and anyone who is a non HRH sibling of the monarch needs the monarch's permission to give a particular name to their newborn child. Likewise no one in the above categories can change their name without the monarch's permission. He can wear the uniform of an officer of any branch of the military. He can visit any military institution, station, fort etc and any vessel. He can talk to any government employee he wants to and they can't refuse. He can order the creation of a new medal for the military and he can grant it to any member of the military he chooses. He can access any top secret document he wants to. The monarch can only abdicate if they have not yet had a coronation. Once crowned the monarch cannot legally abdicate. He could declare himself abdicated but the government is banned from recognizing anyone else as monarch until he dies. There have been a handful of exceptions but they have been forced to abdicate under threat of death. In fact more monarchs have been executed than have legally abdicated. The part of the coronation ceremony that excludes legal abdication as a possibility is the anointment. British monarchs are the only ones that are anointed. The anointment basically means that only God can unmake the monarch. In theory, a monarch can choose not to be anointed. This might be an indication they intend to abdicate at some point. Also in theory the government could retroactively not recognize this aspect of the coronation as legitimate. The government could also change the laws effectively deposing the monarch and declare itself a republic or declare an interregnum (space between kings) during which time the country is a de facto republic such as happened with the first Charles and a fellow named Cromwell. The monarch could be declared unable to rule and a regent would be appointed though today they have a regency council who would collectively rule in his stead or they could choose someone (likely the prince of Wales) to be the regent. Charles could request that if he felt it was time to retire. At that point all the powers of king would be bestowed upon the regent. He can turn anyone into a royal or noble that he chooses and he can take those statuses away any time he chooses. Charles is believed to be planning to reduce the number of HRH's on the roster.

I too have the power to end dinner parties in my house. Then again, the video is entertaining ...

King Charles doesn't need a license now but he had one before.

2:51 you say that King Charles III has never passed a driver's test - true enough. But Prince Charles of Whales has passed a driver's test and was issued a driver's, so has princess Elizabeth. Also 4:01 - it's "prosecution" not persecution.

Speed limit one kinda irrelevant, he could travel down a country road at 100mph on his own in a race car without police escort if he wanted because he's above the law anyway.

I have to agree,

It's true that the king can get away with murder, but only so long as he is ruler. Should he abdicate, he would be charged with that murder.

0:39, to let you know, Simplified Explanation you say it’s Northern Ireland, but it’s a video in Wales. Just letting you know. 🙂

Best Autobiography: ================ When I was a child my father cheated and didn't love my family. Later my parents divorced. Soon my mother died in a car accident. My brother & I could only live in my grandma's old house. The whole family lived on my grandma's savings. Gramdma just died. Dad, now 73 had to go out to work to support the family. =Prince William=

TNX GOOD

So the crown DOES have some power...

Script sounds like it was written by a school child trying to write a 2k word essay.

Slight correction, it is the "Commonwealth Realms." Each realm country is a Commonwealth Realm in itself, rather than the whole collection of members being a singular entity.

Showing Liz Truss while saying the Prime-Minister is chosen democratically 💀. Also saying Charles rarely drives him self is false. He said he prefers to drive him self and does the 9/10 times

So basically he's untouchable and can pretty much do as he pleases regardless

Charles Passed his driving test in 1967 he holds a driving license.

A lot I did not know. When the Queen was dying, they were burning rubber, to get there!

A very powerful individual

King Charles does not need a driving licence or passport now. when he was prince Charles he had both. queen Elizabeth learned to drive with the bsm and when she became queen did not need a driving licence either.

Please learn the difference between the two words 'persecution' and prosecution'.

The King's birthday (which ever day it is) is not a public holiday in UK

Well put together, although some of it isn't entirely accurate.

He can be tried for Criminal Treason against the position of the Monarch. The position is what an individual inherits. Also, remember James I. Although Oliver Cromwell did much worse damage to the nation.

I bet they regretted The Approval of the Royal Proposals for Meghan..

SNAP! I GOT THE POWER.

#1 serve as king…well that’s obvious

The official birthday is nomally a Saturday in June not the 10th but around then. The 10th of June was Prince Phillip's birthday.

Go to 15:35 and mr bean is shaking the kings hand

Nobody is above the law. Source: Magna Carta He can only appoint and dismiss a PM at the behest of parliament Much "power" he has is theoretical or ceremonial. It could and would be stripped immediately by parliament, if abused or simply if parliament sees fit. The house of lords is formally appointed by the crown. Who he appoints is "proposed" (decided) by the PM with advice from the Appointments Commission If Charles declared war parliament would revoke that order and strip him of the power. The PM DOES have the power to declare war, which is quite significant. For example Joe Biden does not. Old Joe would need congress to action it. They can grant pardons. Most pardons are proposed by the commons. He can refuse royal assent for new laws. Again, the first time he did would be the last. The UK is a democracy. Church stuff is correct. He is the head of the Church of England. He owns the swans. Yup. Means FA in the present day but it's fair to include it. RE: appointing knights - "Honours are decided and announced by the Cabinet Office twice a year: at New Year and on The Queen's official birthday in June. They are then presented to recipients by members of the Royal Family throughout the year at ceremonies known as 'Investitures'." - source: royal.uk

Like the lyrics to in the end by linking park says.... WATCH YOU GO!.... 🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭 Giggle Oh yes they will watch me leave so royal family Don't Worry..... God is in CONTROL I'd be dead if NOT for his support and miracles....

The speeding one is incorrect as the emergency services do have to stick to the speed limit unless it’s a emergency. The main reason he can’t break be done for speeding is he’s as stated Immune from prosecution

The prime minister should not have a say in the appointment of any bishops they are Christian matters for true believers. The prime minister may be a Christian but that’s not always certain.

Actually he's not completely immune to criminal punishments. Let's say he commits a crime here in the Americas, while he can't be sent to prison, he and his country can be sanctioned. In other words we can make life very hard for his citizens, and they in turn can make life very hard for him.

When Wealth is Lost Nothing is Lost; When Health is Lost Somethings are Lost; When CHARACTER is Lost All is Lost ! 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

1. Be as king of the uk and the commonwealth realm (Google it) 2. Drive without a driver's license. (He doesn't even have a license.) 3. Drive without a license plate. 4. Decide the royal dress code. (Gets to decide what the royals wear, can ban a color or hairstyle. Final say on it) 5. Sovereign Immunity (Immune to all laws) 6. Approves royal proposal 7. Appoint a prime minister 8. Dismiss a prime minister(Highly unlikely) 9. Open parlament 10. Appoint members to the house of lords. (Second chamber of parlament) 11. Appoint supreme court 12. Declare war(Head of armed forces) 13. Skip taxes😡 14. Travel without a passport 15. Grant a pardon to criminals 16. To avoid jury duty 17. Legitimize laws 18. No speed limit(Can go as fast as he want) 19. Celebrate 2 birthdays(Tradition) 20. Keep all his finances private Thank me later.

The monarch may not have dismissed a PM in Britain for a long time but in 1975 her vice regal representative in Australia, Sir John Kerr, Governor General, dismissed Gough Whitlam on the 11th of November, Remembrance Day, the day Ned Kelly was hung. Also Jack Lang, Premier of NSW, was dismissed by the Governor of NSW, Sir Philip Game on the 13th of May 1932.

the amount of inaccuracies in this is amazing.