Army pushes for higher speeds in future tiltrotor aircraft

  Рет қаралды 128,119

U.S. Army DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory

U.S. Army DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory

5 жыл бұрын

The U.S. Army is developing a new wind-tunnel testbed that will help future tiltrotor aircraft attain higher speeds, improved stability and enhanced safety. Read more... www.army.mil/article/221188

Пікірлер: 97
@grease_monkey6078
@grease_monkey6078 4 жыл бұрын
The Vertibird is a reality. I love these machines
@boomer0117zr
@boomer0117zr 4 жыл бұрын
Hitchdude it needs chin mounted guns and a Gunship model....and ride of the Valkyries playing all the time lol
@dadinkle
@dadinkle 3 жыл бұрын
Look up the osprey lmao that'll blow your mind
@shane99ca
@shane99ca 2 жыл бұрын
@@boomer0117zr Hueys of the Vietnam era had weapons bolted on as an afterthought; they weren't designed to be gunships. I expect they won't make that mistake again.
@spreadeagled5654
@spreadeagled5654 4 жыл бұрын
The success of the V-22 Osprey in production and operational service paves the way for more tilt-rotors to follow. 👍
@theoriginaltroll4truth
@theoriginaltroll4truth 4 жыл бұрын
Now add that US navy anti gravity patent in there somehow.
@TheTeeDay
@TheTeeDay 4 жыл бұрын
Can’t wait for quad tilt rotor
@Talonf37
@Talonf37 3 жыл бұрын
Yes!
@solarfunction1847
@solarfunction1847 3 жыл бұрын
I wonder if they will implement a belly missile launch system where they could have several missiles inside the cabin in a slanted position similar to a gun's mag clip so that the missiles could lower into place out of a hidden doorway that launches the missiles. Such a system would only take away around 6 inches of side room inside the cabin each side with the missiles slanted so it would take up about 6 feet wide from floor to ceiling of missiles perhaps up to 7 or 8 missiles each side of inside the cabin. A smaller 20mm Gatling multi barrel gun could be deployed from a pop out turret that has a 90 degree sideways sweep & 45 degree elevation sweep for targeting as well as a 20mm belt fed gun for a operator to use from the rear of the heliplane. These improvements would take the heliplane into a formidable attack class troupe carrier, cargo carrier being used on hotzones.
@mr.meeseeks9802
@mr.meeseeks9802 4 жыл бұрын
As someone who actually works on CV-22s... please stop trying to make my life more hellacious
@gravestone9831
@gravestone9831 3 жыл бұрын
Lmao hydraulic nightmare, and I don't even work on them lol
@turkishedits6079
@turkishedits6079 4 жыл бұрын
Very good brothers 👍 from turkey
@ericu1196
@ericu1196 2 жыл бұрын
One of these was seen in Kansas today.
@killingfields1424
@killingfields1424 3 жыл бұрын
Tip in flying this new aircraft. Always put in mind that its a helicopter with side mounted rotors for thats how it fly safely. Short stubby wings cannot provide lift at speeds below 180 knots
@dadsonworldwide3238
@dadsonworldwide3238 4 жыл бұрын
Make it both like shnook and tilt rotor plane .
@maxwarrior3324
@maxwarrior3324 4 жыл бұрын
Uh 60 and Chenook helicopters look so god damn sexy
@ossamaguettaoui1656
@ossamaguettaoui1656 4 жыл бұрын
hello everyone, someone knows what kind of driveshaft they use for those aircraft?
@saardean4481
@saardean4481 3 жыл бұрын
wouldnt it be more efficient for hovering if the wings would tilt instead of only the end part tilting? Is there an aerodynamic flaw in this?
@edwardbarnett6571
@edwardbarnett6571 3 жыл бұрын
Any chance of using three jets for extra stability and speed with one at the front?
@sqeric48
@sqeric48 3 жыл бұрын
Theoretically....would there be a benefit if the blades of the rotors were able to telescope to a 50% reduction plus an additional fold out aileron to increase cruise speed and facilitate a traditional type airplane type landing in case an engine goes down?
@IchlasulAmmal
@IchlasulAmmal Жыл бұрын
Folding a rotor blade mid air while spinning in high speed is suicide. But not impossible
@sylvaincarrier3904
@sylvaincarrier3904 4 жыл бұрын
Used my technology again tube with tube under presu inside
@VictorLepanto
@VictorLepanto 5 жыл бұрын
Do these new p roped vehicles have a turboprop ability? I would think that would make difference.
@taoliu3949
@taoliu3949 4 жыл бұрын
They are turboprop
@tammyl3726
@tammyl3726 2 жыл бұрын
Bell 🔔🔥🇺🇸🌎Awesome!!
@wonkothesane8691
@wonkothesane8691 4 жыл бұрын
Are they considering anything like the Rotodyne design model? I like the design myself, but being I'm not an engineer, I defer to those whom are.
@jebise1126
@jebise1126 4 жыл бұрын
nah... they cant make that thing overly expensive so its not interesting lol
@mikerogers4640
@mikerogers4640 4 жыл бұрын
The Rotodyne is limited by advancing retreating blade to less than 200 mph.
@jebise1126
@jebise1126 4 жыл бұрын
@@mikerogers4640 yes it was slow but that is not the limit at all for such craft. if main rotor is rotating much slower and wings take most of the lift 400km/h should not be a problem. after all mi24 has the max speed of 330km/h and with no pusher prop and wings.
@hotchihuahua1546
@hotchihuahua1546 4 жыл бұрын
They are cool looking , those rotor blades are huge and intimidating, knowing the centrifugal force of these blades in a catastrophic situation makes me cringe !
@sparrow9990
@sparrow9990 4 жыл бұрын
That very tiny osprey like thing at the beginning of the vidio that better be real and real cheap because that thing looks fun lol
@opencurtin
@opencurtin 3 жыл бұрын
Why not use engines like they use on the British built tornado for take off and flying ?
@dadinkle
@dadinkle 3 жыл бұрын
Man I want this one to be adopted
@julianmorrisco
@julianmorrisco 3 жыл бұрын
Very unique! As in more unique than just averagely unique….
@williamprice3929
@williamprice3929 3 жыл бұрын
The Army belly ached a long time ago that it was prohibited from using fixed wing aircraft for offensive operations. This was the whine during the development of the Cheyenne helicopter. The solid rotor was one problem, the other problem was it had wings. Only the Air Force was suppose to have fixed wing offensive aircraft.
@tardis9905
@tardis9905 3 жыл бұрын
The Army's belly aching and whining? Its the Air Force's demands that forcibly created and imposed that fixed wing policy. If they haven't done so already, should come as no surprise if the AF steps in and put a stop to this program.
@sparks2429
@sparks2429 3 жыл бұрын
When are they just going to ditch the turbo props and go full jet engines to make an irl halo pelican
@64CSAR
@64CSAR 4 жыл бұрын
Make it stable then throw a 155 into it
@matthewspry4217
@matthewspry4217 2 жыл бұрын
High speed whirly gig technology , army wanna go supersonic maverick
@mikerogers4640
@mikerogers4640 4 жыл бұрын
A tilt rotor has to use the same blades for lift and for thrust. The twist of the blades has to be a compromise. If they are well designed for low speed lift, they are wrong for high speed flight. It is then difficult to get high speed flight and good efficiency. Bell have been working on tilt rotor design for sixty years. The army want to do better. Really?
@upcycleengineer7825
@upcycleengineer7825 4 жыл бұрын
They are working with Bell, I think the biggest issue is they don’t want the prob that arose with the V-22
@chrissmith7669
@chrissmith7669 4 жыл бұрын
The difference total twist is the same. The twist distribution is where there’s a difference. They can’t really produce a blade with the optimum twist for either. Blade design is a best fit that’s close enough. There are some ideas for blades that change twist with RPM thanks to the magic of composite layers and the 6x6 matrix.
@gforce5529
@gforce5529 4 жыл бұрын
It's kind of annoying seeing how Army acts as they are the ones figuring out the benefits of this platform when in fact because they bailed out from the initial program made it really harder to come to life. Had not been for USMC determination to have the tilt-rotor, they would have had empty talks today or bought the damn thing from Japan.
@gforce5529
@gforce5529 4 жыл бұрын
@@upcycleengineer7825 Right, USMC, Navy or Air Force wanted the issues from the get go, to make life interesting. Maybe you should read something about how this program was almost killed several times and what role Army played in those attempts.
@chrissmith7669
@chrissmith7669 4 жыл бұрын
@G Force, the Army dunked the Osprey before they bailed. Thanks to them it lost the ability to pressurize and gained a hook that made everyone treat it like an expensive quickish helicopter.
@lorenzoo90
@lorenzoo90 5 жыл бұрын
What about Contra rotating propellers
@nicholaslutsch5036
@nicholaslutsch5036 4 жыл бұрын
That is also being developed. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky-Boeing_SB-1_Defiant
@KARL-el3hr
@KARL-el3hr 3 жыл бұрын
The Aircraft looks great...But no weapons?? Why??? U can't always rely on Apaches or Cobras to provide Air Support and firepower...These tilt rotors should have been installed Heavy weapons such as Miniguns, Bushmaster Gun, Hellfire Rockets and Guided ammunitions. Etcm
@ericclausen6772
@ericclausen6772 Жыл бұрын
Why don't I see tilt roter aircraft that are armed and engaging target with it's firepower the military helicopters are armed and are force multipliers by destroying the enemy coming in and out of hot LZs every other aircraft that I have seen has weapons systems on board and can engage enemy coming in and out to give your troops the best way in and can keep enemies heads down until the crafts ammo runs out and then leaves after to rearm and pick up another load of troops
@n3v3rforgott3n9
@n3v3rforgott3n9 4 ай бұрын
Because the Osprey is a medium lift aircraft and the Valor is still in early development. The Valor will have door gunners like the Black Hawk at a minimum.
@kaloyan1498
@kaloyan1498 4 жыл бұрын
Look they made the avenger In real Life!
@sparrow9990
@sparrow9990 4 жыл бұрын
The avenger was based off of the osprey
@just_simply_alive1130
@just_simply_alive1130 3 жыл бұрын
If this is where my tax money is going, then I'm perfectly happy 💕
@CarLoverPhotography
@CarLoverPhotography 4 жыл бұрын
Why cant they make tilt rotors with jet engines?
@dukesy6786
@dukesy6786 3 жыл бұрын
That’s just VTOL planes like F-35s and Harriers.
@CarLoverPhotography
@CarLoverPhotography 3 жыл бұрын
Yeah but those are 1-2 people and no cargo
@TheRadMonk
@TheRadMonk 3 жыл бұрын
It's a power to weight ratio. Jet engines can't provide enough vertical lift that's why they need a runway. Plus the exhaust thrust on take-off and landing can cause some crazy ground affects.
@cmdredstrakerofshado1159
@cmdredstrakerofshado1159 2 жыл бұрын
Two big problems FOD issues and what caused most Harrier landing crash pot stalls where the hovering jet engine sucks in low lift super heated jet exhaust and loses up to 50% of its lifting trust
@sparrow9990
@sparrow9990 4 жыл бұрын
It's easy just replace the blades on a osprey with fuckin bigass jets and hope it doesn't flip over or rip the wings off
@notapplicable4567
@notapplicable4567 3 жыл бұрын
Obviously the next step is putting jet engines in the place of the rotor engines
@gosuplaylist-musicaparagam5817
@gosuplaylist-musicaparagam5817 4 жыл бұрын
AVENGER :V
@toymaker-te8fq
@toymaker-te8fq 4 жыл бұрын
wouldn't they solve their issues of speed by using jet engines rather than props....?
@wll2237
@wll2237 3 жыл бұрын
Very insufficient at low speed
@HIDROGONIUMARINO
@HIDROGONIUMARINO 4 жыл бұрын
why do they break their heads ! I already have a design for a mach 1 helicopter they should contact me !
@dickfitswell3437
@dickfitswell3437 4 жыл бұрын
I have design for Mach 6 helo vtol. And it comes with an all you can eat buffet. They should contact me.
@sylvaincarrier3904
@sylvaincarrier3904 4 жыл бұрын
Give delta plane
@phx4closureman
@phx4closureman 3 жыл бұрын
*Just MAKE the Army buy the Osprey , rather than spend all OUR TAX DOLLARS UNNECESSARILY to develop an entirely new aircraft. Problem SOLVED*
@johnkapusta3237
@johnkapusta3237 3 жыл бұрын
the only difference i see is that you enter from the sides instead of the back all together this aircraft is ugly and not needed
@pankajbajaj9578
@pankajbajaj9578 Жыл бұрын
Tilt rotters to be replacedby plasma jets soon
@carringtonndhlovu6145
@carringtonndhlovu6145 2 жыл бұрын
Hope china don't steal your ideas
@svenfrontin-rollet8469
@svenfrontin-rollet8469 4 жыл бұрын
NASA patents
@cbgfgjfhfy7639
@cbgfgjfhfy7639 3 жыл бұрын
Don't air crashe sir.
@brianmoore1164
@brianmoore1164 3 жыл бұрын
Incredibly loud. No where near the ability of the Raider / Defiant program. DOES NOT have turboprop speed. Needs much larger landing zones. There are some basic transport in noncombat area missions that this thing is suitable for, but do not buy off on the idea that this replaces helicopters.
@n3v3rforgott3n9
@n3v3rforgott3n9 4 ай бұрын
"No where near the ability of the Raider / Defiant program" ... Except it is faster, flies further, has better acceleration and deceleration, carrier more people or a heavier load, and didn't have the multiple technical issues the Defiant had... Not to mention you are overstating the size of it as it can already fit in the vast majority of LZs the Black Hawk would use.
@brianmoore1164
@brianmoore1164 4 ай бұрын
@@n3v3rforgott3n9 quite literally the only one you got right is flies further. Your words are obviously without knowledge.
@n3v3rforgott3n9
@n3v3rforgott3n9 4 ай бұрын
@@brianmoore1164 My guy... public knowledge that was released show that the Defiant's max speed in testing was 247kts... that is 63 kts slower than the Valor. They have also released statements saying the valor beat the Defiant in time to altitude tests (acceleration) and time to stop from cruise speed (deceleration). Along with the Valor being able to carry 2 more troops and well over 1k lbs. You have your facts so totally off. The Valor also only has a 19% larger total footprint and can pit anywhere a Black Hawk can as long as it isn't restricted by the blades of the Black Hawk on all 4 sides. IE it is wider but also much shorter so turn it 90 degrees and it will fit. It has also been proven to fit in existing hangars made for the Black Hawk.
@brianmoore1164
@brianmoore1164 4 ай бұрын
@n3v3rforgott3n9 Since its max speed was not a max speed at all and only a tested speed so far, everything you said after that must be ignored due to your obvious lack of knowledge.
@n3v3rforgott3n9
@n3v3rforgott3n9 4 ай бұрын
@@brianmoore1164 HAHA Ok so the cruise speed was 33 KTs faster than the max speed the Defiant has shown. You are just a joke at this point. Everything I said is public knowledge and even Sikorsky hasn't disputed the numbers and facts given.
@jamisonmaguire4398
@jamisonmaguire4398 2 жыл бұрын
What I don't understand is why the Army needs to develop their own tilt rotor aircraft when there is so much data already from other successful aircraft like the V22 Osprey, AW609 and prototypes like the XV15 & XV-3. Its like they are trying to reinvent the wheel and it reminds me of another failure to use readily available and successful APC from the Marine Corps. They chose instead to spend billions on a completely new vehicle called the Stryker which also had less capability in every way. It seems the Army loves to spend taxpayers dollars simply because they can.
@tsclly2377
@tsclly2377 4 жыл бұрын
junk reporting.. no viable timeline to the vidi clips.. straight up PR garbage
@jamesmerkel9442
@jamesmerkel9442 3 жыл бұрын
WE r not buying this light wt crap. We need heavy lift 4 tilt V-22 type planes or 3 helo floating helo dump trucks. Speed is low on the list in peace time world In a disaster work we hve what we need in spades right NOW 10 times over.
@frank9240
@frank9240 3 жыл бұрын
WELL (gee whiz) what happened to the harrier..??? this thing is a piece of shit ! (hands down)
@hmn4124
@hmn4124 3 жыл бұрын
Wow that is not a good code name for the new design. Trast. Sounds like Trash.
Future Tiltrotor Aircraft Revealed
10:00
US Military News
Рет қаралды 944 М.
Leonardo’s AW609 Tiltrotor Progresses Toward Certification - AIN
3:25
Aviation International News
Рет қаралды 195 М.
I CAN’T BELIEVE I LOST 😱
00:46
Topper Guild
Рет қаралды 115 МЛН
Incredible magic 🤯✨
00:53
America's Got Talent
Рет қаралды 72 МЛН
Bell-Boeing Quad TiltRotor (QTR) - Concept Of Deployment
7:51
MechDesignTV
Рет қаралды 189 М.
Bell V-280 Valor Reaches 80 Knots
3:10
Bell
Рет қаралды 231 М.
India's 5th Gen Aircraft | HAL AMCA
14:47
Australian Military Aviation History
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
AVX Aircraft Coaxial Compound Helicopter for US Army JMR/FVL
5:03
Gearless Magnet Bike
17:57
Tom Stanton
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
What Went Wrong With Germany's Insane Hover Transport?
9:36
Mustard
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
V-22 Osprey Tilt-Rotor Aircraft In Action • Compilation
7:44
Gung Ho Vids
Рет қаралды 1,9 МЛН
This Could Be the Future of the US Marine Corps
8:16
Defense News
Рет қаралды 230 М.
Leonardo AW609 Tiltrotor
2:03
JUSTHELICOPTERS
Рет қаралды 310 М.
1$ vs 500$ ВИРТУАЛЬНАЯ РЕАЛЬНОСТЬ !
23:20
GoldenBurst
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
АЙФОН 20 С ФУНКЦИЕЙ ВИДЕНИЯ ОГНЯ
0:59
КиноХост
Рет қаралды 217 М.
Как слушать музыку с помощью чека?
0:36
Easy Art with AR Drawing App - Step by step for Beginners
0:27
Melli Art School
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Хотела заскамить на Айфон!😱📱(@gertieinar)
0:21
Взрывная История
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН