1988 JULES REMI GOFFLO CÉSAR ROMAN EMPIRE

1988 ROME ROMAN EMPIRE

Where are the famous Dacion swords ? They were curved down like a cycle ?

Hi Yaaaa

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e5aCg9Coxp-WcWw.html full movie with traduction

They also use their shields mostly as counterweight, rather than as a shield. But I agree, there are worse fights in younger movies.

Pôles ou pour moi je on ooilililiilló

I agree 100% realistic.

On the other hand, Decebalus knew Severus father well which was dacian and did have no choice but regret in kill him ... Note how Decebalus put dirt in Severus hand , a sacrifice customs .

I agree. I thought the swordplay was Graves. The "fight" afterward was awful enough to make historians roll over in their graves.

Low budget with massive crowds on horses and in armor?

Yh that ent low budget. There isn't any cgi, those people are real and in costume

@@yoyo-lf3ld - There WAS NO CGI in 1966. Especially not in Romania!

@@berbentos most of them were real life soldiers. You had to complete 1 year of military instruction in romania. And The great producer Sergiu nicolaiescu often used them. No payment was given because they were doing their service

And your Italia?? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@Andy Butler stupid thing to say when hungary wasn`t invented yet and in slovakia and bulgaria was Dacian empires also, its posible that in hungary are also dacians or Huns that mean mongol hoards. PS: all easter europe its from Dacian civilization.

@Andy Butler The bad luck part was that they was free men and free men make alliances very hard only under a very strong leader. Bulgarian was Thracians ( moesia inferior) Serbs idk :D (moesia superior) in romania was dacians and there was the capital also and in the north sarmatae ,carpi,costoboci.And in the south,west of Bulgaria was Getae its a huge area, but the romans went for the capital they could never colonize Dacians,Tracians,Gotzi,Vizigotzi there was alot of tribes.

habalalabalalaldaldalalabalala

😄

It’s called loose formation, and it’s helps against missile shots by archers etc.

😂😂

ذ

To be fair, it's garbage

@@alexanders.170 Agreed.

Well at least they are advancing in formation instead of running at each other pell mell like in most movies.

ooops...I spoke too soon!

Yup. This never happened at this battle or any other. Dramatic license to be sure. Commanders were there to lead their professional and powerful armies to victory. Not sacrifice themselves like fools.

I think the winner Will boost their army morale and of course the Hero battle is just about art and story

Yup. This never happened at this battle or any other. Dramatic license to be sure.

It is different here since Domitian the roman emperor did not go on field instead he sent his general Severus to fight Decebalus the king of Dacia, so there are no equal ranks here and before this battle the roman expansion reached the dacia border and all negociations were lost as romans sought to subdue Dacia for the rich gold that was to pay for their quest in expansionism.

@@georgeborcean8564 Didn't the Roman ultimately wipe out Dacia?

@@JohnHoulgate They did. The tables turned when new emperor Trajan took and led the army himself in wars years 101- 106 .Until now Dacians fought offensive south of Danubius river and here began defensive war and later lost

Nope...kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rKupadeUupzJfIk.html...

@@tendo3526 I saw the video you liked! It has nothing to do with Romania or Dacia or Rome. The Romanian nation MY nation is direct dicessent of the great DACIANS. Your video has nothing to do with the Dacian culture. The video is strict on Indias history!

@@tendo3526 Yup, you know nothing about Romanian history.

@@tendo3526 🤡🤡 are you a Clown from India?? Or stupid to distinguish the words?? 😱😱😱🤡🤡🤡🤡

Wales invaded England just over there boarder in 1400 with a coalition and both armys had the high ground. So for 1 week they camped and did nothing and starved Wales out and then they went home. A little part of Britain's history never mentioned.

@@jasonrandall5148 So the taffs got hungry and f....d off.

The fight here was different .. this fight was orchestrated by Decebalus in such way that the mountain terrain and Danubius river made it difficult for romans to choose the way they fight + Domitian was bad emperor and lost many battles up to year 101 .

Not always. It depends from fighter's skills.

because it s a celtic boian warlord, after the defeat and annexion of the celtic boian by burebista they integrate the dacian army but the costume or roman legionaire are prettty wrong

The Roman’s feather helmet through his balance way off.

@@zyraxesdac7583 Boian vine din boi mare nimic cu celții și coiful e identic ca și la odrisci bitini pelasgi și fringi din Anatolia

Yes those were my thoughts, where's the tight formation

I'm saying the same thing where is the line of Spears and shields the Romans as you all know where most effective when fighting is a unit they got cut the pieces at teutoburg because they couldn't form up the Caravans stretched miles I can see why the Romans lost this one

Well, it seems even Ceausescu in this way was trying to save money :)

Not the helmet though. The helmet used by the actor in this movie is a copy of The Helmet of Cotofanesti, which was, in fact, purely ceremonial, given the fact that it is made entirely out of gold. Please excuse any grammar mistakes.

Also, the Falx and the shield the Dacian is using are not accurate at all.

Consistent with latest discoveries? Your kidding, right? This was a pretty low budget interpretation of what little was known 55 years ago.

@@rollothewalker5535 The falx, shild and costumes are like romans carved in stone 1900 years ago on Traian column in Rome. You can compare. The column shows 2,662 figures and 155 scenes; Trajan himself appears on the column 58 times. Decebal's helmet is not accurate.

Trajan's Column (Italian: Colonna Traiana, Latin: Columna Traiani) is a Roman triumphal column in Rome, Italy, that commemorates Roman emperor Trajan's victory in the Dacian Wars. It is located in Trajan's Forum, north of the Roman Forum. Completed in AD 113, the freestanding column is most famous for its spiral bas relief, which depicts the wars between the Romans and Dacians (101-102 and 105-106). The column shows 2,662 figures and 155 scenes; Trajan himself appears on the column 58 times. You can compare with the movie.

Brave heart was filled with 2 terrible and inaccurate battles.

@@charlescatt4607 were you not entertained?!

@@4rnnr_as nah Gladiator was pants lol

Yeah, Mel was a teen when this movie was made.in Communist Romania and in USA TV's start in color. I say that wiith their resources at the time they did great....

@@georgeborcean8564 have to agree with you from that perspective. I still wish it was more inline with Spartacus or showed some Roman tactics though.

see your point but the Romans were a professional army that worked the averages and would have seen the opposition as savages hence no honour in fighting them.

John Smith-it might come a surprise to you but Roman army actually had very long tradition of personal duels and duels of the champions.Also-that short sword you had on mind was in fact designed and effective as both slashing and stabbing weapon(not only as stabbing weapon as it is often erroneously propagated.That misinterpretation have its origin in fact that it was primarily used for stabbing but not only for stabbing ).On the other hand the way how they fought each other hardly looks how they would fight in reality.

I have read a lot of books on the Roman period and have not come across any examples of military duels being fought perhaps you could suggest a book. As for the Gladius, it could be used for chopping as well as thrusting but it was short and not designed for duels such as this and as we see in the fight the longer sword won the day.

None of those two would fight like this.If this happened in reality both would rather fought in a style similar to Gladiators and fought from behind shield protection not waving with their swords like children playing on soldiers while constantly exposing their vital areas to opponent.In this film they are holding their shields in really ridiculous way like if ignoring them. As for "gladius-most people use that generic latin word which simply means "a sword"(any sword regardless shape,lenght of blade or type) as if it was typological term for specific line of short swords but it was not typological term,at least not for the romans.for them it was just basic word for(any)sword.Talking about is as about " short" aword is also misleading.Hispanic swords existed in many types and although shortest of them(modernly ranked as Pompeii type) had blades ranging from 42 to 55 cm people are often surprised discovering that they imagined it shorter when they had opportunity to see Hispanic swords with their own eyes and holding it in their own hands.This is especially the case for earliest type(modernly called as "Gladius Hispaniensis") which was dominant type for example in the army of Julius Caesar.People are often shocked that its not that short how they imagined and ocassionaly confuse it with Spatha type swords(and Gladius Hispaniensis indeed had blade lenght fully comparable with swords otherwise ranked to Spathae family). As for duels-there is no book about this but you can obviously find examples in many ancient writters across centuries or you can also read this article which directly focus on it(link provided).Story of Titus Manlius Torquatus dueling celtic chieftain was among the most famous in the Roman army.Even Marcus Antonius invited Octavian to personal duel and much later Emperor gallienus one of his enemies. www.academia.edu/31861663/Champions_and_Tradition_Single_Combat_in_the_Age_of_Belisarius At this 2nd article search for subtitle "Duelists": www.academia.edu/31905371/Brave_Deeds_Heroes_of_the_Roman_Army

@@JohnSmith-zv8km Correct. They would not have sacrificed a commander in this manner. Just plain stupid.

He had no clue about Dacian/barbarian tactics either.

I am sure he knew, i knew him well. Most probably he had to follow the Party sugestions.Sergiu N was a great fan of Sam Peckinpah.

Yes, it was the typical dacian sword.

@@MMadesen thank you

Decky Borneo ,dmmc

Decky Borneo. Are you joking ?

Alexander was such a fool, leading his men in the battle... I guess that is why he is named "great".

Physical prowess n fighring tactics n weapons armor were employed those years

Well, with nothing else to do, put the red army in historical battle dress og let them have a go. For true grand scale battle scene, check out "War and Peace", the 1968 soviet version.

Romans did not wear pants. They didn't need it in Rome where there was a warm Mediterranean climate. They wore a tunic up to the knees. Look at all the ancient Roman statues and Trajan's column. The Dacians wore pants because it is cold in the Carpathian mountains. Only in American movies like Gladiator do Romanians wear pants, which is a big historical mistake. The Celts had an eagle on their helmet. The Dacians had connections with the Celts.

How smart. Sadly you know nothing.

@@iancuPotcoava24 he’s right. That was the worst sword fight I’ve ever seen.

In fact sword fight are most likely to look like that in real life. Still more realistic than most of the sword fight usually seen in movies.

Dacii kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hsiUqKV-x664iHk.html for english subtitles push CC button

только это не друиды! Это те, кто сейчас называется румыны! ))

Это Даки,сыны Буребисты и Децибала !!!!

1988 REMI GOFFLO CÉSAR ROMAN EMPIRE

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ZpOifcdnnbLVcoU.html Dacia 1966

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e5aCg9Coxp-WcWw.html full movie with traduction

@@andyromania7389 thank you very much

Dacii kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hsiUqKV-x664iHk.html DACII (ENGLISH SUBTITLE push CC Button) with Amza Pellea, Pierre Brice, Georges Marchal, Marie- Jose Nat

this was done in the 60's we didnt know that much about roman equipmant or the way they fought.

for an eastern european movie made in the 60's? f ing critics, that s a masterpiece

stia boss ule toata lumea si cum luptau romanii si toate nebuniile astea. istoria era aceiasi si in 1960 ca si acum, si aveau si destui oameni, altfel nu ar fi putut să faca scenele alea cu atatia oameni in lupta si chestii. poate doar de echipament sa zici că duceau lipsa. dar e si john asta vreun mare critic de film, plm.