sorry mate, this is chinese spyware

High m8, I'm cancer free too now, in 2019 I had a right nephrectomy and on the 27 of March 2024 I had a left partial nephrectomy. which left me with 60% of ONE kidney resulting in 37% kidney function. Less than 30% require dialysis. But now I'm pissing out of 2 holes, so now i have a stent from kidney to bladder then an 8mm catheter to a bag then to a larger detachable drain bag and another pig tail drain that enters through my back into the bag of urine that my body made to contain the leaking urine which pass's into another bag.The drain isn't that uncomfortable but the catheter sux balls and i've had it in since the 9th of April. 😞

Please double (then triple) check your opera ad Jingles 🌶️🔥 no judgement

Hey Jingles I don't recall if you have done it before but. How about HMS Warspite best video submission. Giving viewers a little time to get a game sent in. From a Army veteran heathen who doesn't have HMS Warspite yet. Stay healthy!

@@mathewsmith5295 Haha that's so funny. I noticed it too. Funny website that is

And we in the salt mines also hope you are having a good one Jingles!

you're*

It makes my day. Keep it up.

Amen brother 👍🏻😊

Saw that one as well. Wry smile deployed 😂😂

I like Jingles and Flambass but I am pissed off as , for 5 years I am sending replays to Jingles , and none got in , and I have noticed that Jingles is old silly man , and you need to have nick that work for him or be you tuber that he know , is hard to "get in out the street" .

​@@1BlueSatelite Well, Jingles is under no obligation to accept replays and he never actually said he would, nor did he ever really make it clear, what his process is for that. So ultimately it's up to him entirely and I am fine with that. Saying that as someone who sent in dozens of replays, none of which he ever featured and that's fine. Flambass provides much more sophisticated gameplay anyway 😂

@@therealbadidol I agree that Jingles don't have to do it ... but there is reason why his numbers went down in past few years , because he think that he choose right videos , Jingles is creature of habit and comfort = lazy so he does bare minimum , Flambass is great player , but if I would like to see Flambass video I would go check Flambass channel , what that have to do with replays ? , just check Jingles numbers of views , those have dropped in past 3 years , wows & wot videos are his meat and potato , other videos get 1/4 views on average , in Jingles would be 1. play replays of random players , 2. start playing wows & wot and stream it . 3. get back to CC programs , because his you tube adventure might to end badly , and from that he said , he don't have huge pension and he would need to get real job too ... I wish Jingles well , but fact is he need to stop being so lazy . o7

@@1BlueSatelite To each their own. Our mileages in terms of evaluation of Jingles' account/channels surely do vary there. My evaluation - as absolute outsider who just watches his content but doesn't follow his stats as closely as you apparently do - so far is, that he's doing fine enough apparently and ultimately, he needs to be doing it his way. At the end of the day, it's up to him and the rest will then be handled by supply and demand. Jingles will have his own metrics and goals and if those start not being met anymore, he'll surely adapt. Or not. Up to him. As I said, I get your point, I just don't agree with it and that's fine. We can agree to disagree ;)

Actually Jingles, I'm just hoping you're having a non-eventful one. 🤩

Ahhhh this is definitely a day of negative vibes,not a beautiful tank in sight. Thanks for the entertainment sir and rest in peace. 😢

Right you are. Same w/ me😢😢😢

Sunrise doesn't last all morning, a cloudburst doesn't last all day...

He didn't get all the kills; he only got 5 out of 8.

@@Storm3150 all opponents that were killed, were killed by him. This was a 6 v 6 and he killed 5 opponents and one opponent survived so was not killed at all.

@@eavdmeer He's saying that the enemy team got 3 kills so out of all kills in the match he got 5 of 8. He's technically correct - the best kind of correct

@@HirokuDev guess that's debatable. Even that is only "technically" correct if you can kill your own team mates. Can you? I don't play this game 😂

The best kind of truth - the technical truth.

Been there, done that! Yep, waking up in the ICU, you definitely get a renewed appreciation of everything that life has to offer. Good luck with the recovery, and I hope you are starting to get some energy back. 😊

Best of luck to you. Make the most of life if possible!

You do know if Flambino ever meets you in the game he will sink you even if it kills him right? On the other hand, the tiara is worth it. :D

I can see why you where fired.

Always been a huge fan of "that's a paddlin"

The idea of angling is very much a WoWs arcade gameplay thing. Distances are very much compressed in the game and real ships do not close distances that fast, so the trade-off between course and 'angling' isn't as clearcut as Wows makes it to be. Also the hitchance is very much arcade-fied. Longer range engagements made just hitting already a huge feat, which requires proper course identification and somewhat stable course of your own ship too, and emphasized deck protection which is angled regardless of relative course.

You are correct. The tactic is called "crossing the T". Desirable position IRL, near suicide in WOWS.

"Crossing the T" has been part of naval warfare since cannons were first put aboard.... Egads, at Surigao Strait, didn't the US BB cross the T of the Japanese? (Crossing the T, is actually how the British dealt with Napoleon's land tactics, too. The French marched up in COLUMN....and the British were in LINE......giving maximum firepower into the COLUMN.......shattering the column.....if not enough firepower, then the COLUMN reached the LINE and broke the LINE, then crushing it)

..or so WG thinks.

and they were both playing poorly

So i am not the only one who noticed