Could Ukrainian Jets With Datalinked AMRAAM & AIM-9X Defeat Russian Su-35? (WarGames 84) | DCS
Рет қаралды 40,178
Күн бұрынGRIM REAPERS 2 (KZfaq): / @grimreapers2
PATREON: / grimreapers
0:00 Overview
1:24 Feasibility Of AIM-9X & AIM-120C/D
4:14 Proof Of Technology Fight
6:39 Discussing Technology Implications
12:43 Battle Details
14:58 Predictions
15:36 Take Off
19:00 BATTLE!
33:27 AIM-9X Dogfight
Mods: • Free DCS Mods
Ukraine-Russia Series:
Modernized F15/F16 vs Su-35: • Could "Modernized" US ...
Can Su-57 Defend Russia From F-22/35: • IMPORTANT Can Su-57 Fe...
IMPROVED Stealth vs Russian Bombers: • HUGELY IMPROVED Could ...
Ukraine Using Hellfire Missile?: • Could Ukrainian Jets U...
US Harpoons vs Russian Navy: • Could Ukrainian Migs H...
Ukraine Using APKWS?: • Could Ukrainian Mi-17s...
Ukraine US HARMs vs Russian S-400: • Is Ukraine Hitting Rus...
Patriot/NASAMS vs Supersonic Missiles: • Video
Fulcrum/Flanker vs Foxbat/Super Flanker: • Mig-29 & Su-27 vs Su-3...
NASAMS vs Russian Cruise Missiles: • Could US-Supplied NASA...
Russian KH-47M2 vs Polish Air Force: • Could Russian Air-Laun...
Su-27 & Drone vs Snake Island: • Could Ukrainian Su-27s...
Su-25s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: • Could Su-25s Penetrate...
NATO Eurofighters vs Crimean AWACS: • Could NATO Eurofighter...
Patriot, Gepard & Gripen vs KH-65: • Could Patriot, Gepard ...
A-10s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: • Could A-10s Penetrate ...
USN Tomahawk Strike Kerch Bridge: • Could Russian Su-35, S...
USAF Stealth Strike Kerch Bridge: • Could USAF Strike Pene...
Ukrainian Jets Strike Kerch Bridge: • Could Ukrainian Jets P...
F-22 Raptors vs Russian Fighters: • Could F-22 Raptors Dom...
Raptor/Eagle vs Super Flanker: • F-22 Raptor & F-15 Eag...
USAF Bombers vs Mariupol Defenses: • Which Aircraft Can Pen...
Ukraine Bombs Snake Island: • 2022 Ukrainian Su-27 F...
Stealth Fighters vs Russian Bombers: • Could USA Operate Stea...
Sinking Of Moskva #3: • Why The Moskva's Radar...
Sinking Of Moskva #2: • Ex-US Navy Guys Specul...
Sinking Of Moskva #1: • How Well Defended Was ...
Russia Nukes Britain: • Could Britain Be Defen...
Ukraine Uses Danish F-16s: • If Denmark Loaned F-16...
Ukraine Uses Polish Mig-29s: • If Poland Loaned Mig-2...
Russian-Britain Missile Attack: • Could Britain Survive ...
Ghost Of Kyiv: • The Ghost Of Kyiv Comm...
Belgorod Raid: • Belgorod Raid: Could A...
Eurofighter/Fulcrum vs Super Flanker: • Eurofighter Typhoon & ...
US Strike vs Odessa • Could A Coordinated US...
Russian Helo Rocket Lob: • Can Helicopters Really...
Russian Su-25 vs US Patriot SAM: • Could Russian Su-25s O...
Understanding Russian SAMs: • Explained: Russian SAM...
Ukrainian Jets Road Operations: • Could Su-27, Mig-29A O...
Russian 40 Mile Convoy: • Could FA-18, A-10 Or B...
Flanker vs Super Flanker: • Ukrainian Su-27 Flanke...
USEFUL LINKS
GRIM REAPERS (KZfaq): / @grimreapers
GRIM REAPERS 2 (KZfaq): / @grimreapers2
GR PODCASTS: anchor.fm/grim-reapers
DCS TUTORIALS: / @grimreapers
DCS BUYERS GUIDE: • DCS World Module Quick...
DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
MERCHANDISE: www.redbubble.com/people/grme...
PATREON monthly donations: / grimreapers
PAYPAL one-off donations: www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDona...
SOCIAL MEDIA
WEBSITE: grimreapers.net/
STREAM(Cap): / grimreaperscap
FACEBOOK: / grimreapersgroup
TWITTER: / grimreapers_
DISCORD(DCS & IL-2): / discord (16+ age limit)
DISCORD(TFA Arma): discordapp.com/invite/MSYJxbM (16+ age limit)
OTHER
CAP'S X-56 HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/open?id=1g7o...
CAP'S WINWING HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/drive/folder...
THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx
#WarGames #GRWarGames #Russia #Ukraine #Su27 #Su35 #AMRAAM #AIM120D #DCSQuestioned #GR #DCSWorld #Aviation #AviationGaming #FlightSimulators #Military
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Ukraine-Russia Series: Modernized F15/F16 vs Su-35: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Y7qfrbd5x6e8hqc.html Can Su-57 Defend Russia From F-22/35: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e5OfdpZ_zN6naWg.html IMPROVED Stealth vs Russian Bombers: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f82nf7plvrHahok.html Ukraine Using Hellfire Missile?: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qcVhjKt1udO0gKs.html US Harpoons vs Russian Navy: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hc-VmJtkqL22k3k.html Ukraine Using APKWS?: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fKioiZyK2qfKkas.html Ukraine US HARMs vs Russian S-400: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m7mpeLKJ2NC7n2w.html Patriot/NASAMS vs Supersonic Missiles: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/n5ehath1ys_ScWg.html Fulcrum/Flanker vs Foxbat/Super Flanker: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eM6ImduUnpqucYk.html NASAMS vs Russian Cruise Missiles: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/prB5ksVqmtDeoJ8.html Russian KH-47M2 vs Polish Air Force: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mdSiiduisZvVaas.html Su-27 & Drone vs Snake Island: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/isWfhdKGl6fdlqM.html Su-25s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qN-GaZiTurDeoqs.html NATO Eurofighters vs Crimean AWACS: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e896Zcd3t86dZZs.html Patriot, Gepard & Gripen vs KH-65: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kM6ol9V_z8_LYZs.html A-10s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eJakjdKglduwmGg.html USN Tomahawk Strike Kerch Bridge: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ZtygnJupp9_Lhmw.html USAF Stealth Strike Kerch Bridge: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f7CSmZxzyN7Sp2Q.html Ukrainian Jets Strike Kerch Bridge: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f552qNCmv7jJcmg.html F-22 Raptors vs Russian Fighters: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/edWdhcae192uh58.html Raptor/Eagle vs Super Flanker: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ocuhjNCmuKvTXWw.html USAF Bombers vs Mariupol Defenses: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/l6mjldKArJa1hWg.html Ukraine Bombs Snake Island: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eL5mbJl-sMrPkmw.html Stealth Fighters vs Russian Bombers: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qN-dbJOb07eoo3U.html Sinking Of Moskva #3: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hK-aotx6zsuzqo0.html Sinking Of Moskva #2: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qdSamcWbxKvbh2g.html Sinking Of Moskva #1: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eN6nm5l-rLKufpc.html Russia Nukes Britain: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qOCbZ5iDq7fbcWw.html Ukraine Uses Danish F-16s: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z52AnM6j1Za1kY0.html Ukraine Uses Polish Mig-29s: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/sKmZZ9dyruDZf4k.html Russian-Britain Missile Attack: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/sN15esmSx9zeeHU.html Ghost Of Kyiv: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/j9iTp5uHmdSVXYk.html Belgorod Raid: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/o7epnrep2ZzKpKs.html Eurofighter/Fulcrum vs Super Flanker: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/g7apfMyhqs7LgmQ.html US Strike vs Odessa kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gcuZgquY38_HZo0.html Russian Helo Rocket Lob: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z5doesp407bDo4E.html Russian Su-25 vs US Patriot SAM: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/l9mgaZyLqcXYf2Q.html Understanding Russian SAMs: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/iJqoh9t9s8C8k6s.html Ukrainian Jets Road Operations: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nqigrbSZztS0kqs.html Russian 40 Mile Convoy: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jNiPYJV3scjQcp8.html Flanker vs Super Flanker: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jLVxqLJ3sbCrm2g.html
@nurgozhin Жыл бұрын
Guys what are talking about, Russians already uses r37m on their su 35s and mig 31, su 27 with amraams are sitting ducks
@dan.vitale Жыл бұрын
Datalink is everything. I think the reasons you see F35Cs grouped with Super Hornets on carriers, and F35As grouped with F15Es (example being the 48th Fighter Wing at Lakenheath) is so the F35s can go ahead of their non-stealthy aircraft and provide information via datalink. It doesn't matter then that the F35s can only carry 4 x missiles, their team mates can go in full murder config and fire off at datalinked targets without being detected themselves. It's quite something.
@brobsonmontey Жыл бұрын
☝☝ This. ☝☝ One of the value points of the F-35 is it's ability to have one aircraft act as a mini-AWACS, forwarding targeting information to other F-35s and F-18's acting as missile trucks. Further, F-35s will (in the near future) also be accompanied by UAVs (e.g. Loyal Wingman) whereby a solo F-35 acts as AWACS + command & control for missile carrying UAVs - this means a single pilot (single F-35 with UAVs) could engage a large number of opponents. In the F-35 simulations done to date, this capability has been an ignored deciding factor.
@wingus79 Жыл бұрын
this
@LondonSteveLee Жыл бұрын
Exactly what Gripen could do 10 years ago. They can even merge RADAR returns in real time to form an impromptu mini AWAC.
@SonsOfLorgar Жыл бұрын
@@LondonSteveLee umm... to increasing extent, that development already started with the SAAB J35 and J/A37 😁
@davidware8496 Жыл бұрын
Silly question from a guy that dosnt know much: Would the use of the radar from a stealthy plane like an f-35 make that aircraft visible to enemy radar? I remember reading about the f-117 “stealth fighter”. They used all thermal imagery to find their targets at night because use of radar would give them them away. Can someone here clear this up for me? I’m thinking of a submarine using active sonar. It shows them what they need to see, but also gives there position away.
@bacco0447 Жыл бұрын
the fact that there might be a stealth aircraft lurking around with radar off and could still shoot at you is pretty creepy
@bacco0447 Жыл бұрын
@@matthewkern3619 exactly, that is a very scary prospect of air combat if you're fighting against something like that
@mimimimeow Жыл бұрын
they are indeed designed to shoot with the radar not emitting, even if there are no datalinked ally nearby. Their passive RWRs are good enough and fused into fire control allowing for weapons-quality bearing track, and the AESA radar only needs to blip a pencil beam once (split second) to get a quick range data and calculate launch envelope. Good enough for a Fox 3 shot. And then there's DAS allowing 360 deg IR track.. yes the future of BVR is indeed scary.
@lionheartx-ray4135 Жыл бұрын
@@matthewkern3619The F15ex is pretty much a missile truck for F35
@Ivyxpinkx Жыл бұрын
@@lionheartx-ray4135 Just to note that nothing is preventing the F-35 from being a missile truck all by itself: www.navalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/F-35A-Beast-Mode-1024x676.jpg
@matthewhull5876 Жыл бұрын
Tom Clancy theorized this in Debt of Honor. AWACS with targeting radar as well as search radar. Interesting concept.
@valuedhumanoid6574 Жыл бұрын
If you ever read the Tom Clancy book Debt of Honor, the Japanese Air Force took American technology, altered it and vastly improved it, and used it against the US. Their AWAC's not only used its search radar to find the targets, they then turned on tracking and fire control to steer AMRAAMs that were blind fired by F-15Js. The launching platforms stayed nose cold the entire time. Of course it is fiction, but with all Clancy novels his fiction is firmly rooted in real life technology. It is so accurate that the Pentagon launched an investigation into his novel Red Storm Rising because of how frightenly accurate his novels were. Turns out that he used public domain info and extrapolated a logical scenario. Just like GR does with these "what if" missions. Just use your imagination on top of your knowledge base and voilà, there you are!
@NE-Explorer Жыл бұрын
No he had friends at Aviation Leak
@TheWeatherbuff Жыл бұрын
GR videos have taken the place of my "news watching time". Since I'm still in DCS Training, it's best I learn and have fun with the GR vids, vs. getting upset watching the news.
@Alex-bi2wv Жыл бұрын
@10:48, NATO's already got AWACS, surveillance and tanker aircraft around Ukraine, they're flying with transponders on and ADS-B data sharing, everybody can see them from apps like Flightradar24, take a look at any time of day and chances are you're gonna find an E-3 or a KC-135 loitering over there.
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Yup already spotted one.
@victormikecharlie1596 Жыл бұрын
They already fly with transponders off, some days ago, they're not more visible in flight radar 24
@joeandjoe2 Жыл бұрын
It's good to see you again cap. Gives me a feeling of nostalgia hearing your voice now. You've become a staple of my KZfaq viewing.
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Nice!
@yahnump Жыл бұрын
Cap, love how you can duct tape a broom handle onto the airframe, with a piece of candy on taped on the end for Damp, and he will taxi everyone out.
@timw483 Жыл бұрын
I heard once of an experiment with loading AIM-9s on B-52s. (No idea if it's true.) You want a missile truck? How many AMRAAMs could you put on a B-52?
@Digi20 Жыл бұрын
All of them.
@randalljones4370 Жыл бұрын
Ending was epic-ah !! Simone is singing Grump off to Valhalla. All hail Violet, the Valkyrie Queen of GR, the reincarnation of Olga, the blue sky over fields of sunflowers.... or whatever they say in Ukraine.
@dexlab7539 Жыл бұрын
Great intro on DataLink and E-2D - thanks Cap!
@exidy-yt Жыл бұрын
Great scrap, especially at the end. GG Reapers!
@jamesfletcher9032 Жыл бұрын
I really like the combination of players views and god mode overlay in this one. Really nice to see whats going on and what people are seeing and feeling.
@filmonewaldeabsebhat Жыл бұрын
Violet is fast becoming one of ny favorite Reapers
@RainbowDash-vy2dn Жыл бұрын
I have to agree
@jamison884 Жыл бұрын
On behalf of the internets, we love it when Damp goes pop, finds a piece of candy, tells the origin story behind his mildly moist sok, and all of the other innuendos within the repertoire.
@jakelibbey4631 Жыл бұрын
it makes my heart flutter and loins stir when cap calls me a "valued viewer"
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
:)
@darrellseike3185 Жыл бұрын
Great idea! This one was a lot of fun!
@jamison884 Жыл бұрын
In the beginning, the discussion of US involvement and doing some brainstorming is good. But, to answer your question, US and NATO have supplied weapons openly to Ukraine including missiles (HARMS) which have led to Russian losses. In addition, US ISR assets in the form of manned planes and surveillance drones have been up nearly 24/7 (such as the RQ-4 Global Hawk flying around the Black Sea and manned USAF EW jets flying circuits SW of Ukraine over Romania). It's sort of an open secret that US wire and signal intelligence is providing Ukraine with information on ammunition dumps, Russian naval assets, fuel depots, infrastructure/transportation hubs, and even the location of Russian generals throughout the war (especially with HIMARS). What we're witnessing is just a percentage of the US intelligence network providing real gains which have been honed by fighting terrorist networks for decades now. In a full-scale war against the US, the amount of data the US would have at their disposal is simply incredible and would result in enemy losses and friendly lives saved on a daily basis. Imagine that full-scale intelligence apparatus, conventional forces, special forces, NATO partners, and then add the US Navy and US air superiority. Only a fool would WANT TO face that in a war.
@TheStormpilgrim Жыл бұрын
Getting high fast with some offensive crank...sounds like a Friday night in my part of the country.
@angrypandaification Жыл бұрын
Man I love Grumpnik and Sok... They should start a DCS sitcom.
@IRONIC1688 Жыл бұрын
A legacy Flanker with a working HMD and the AIM9X must be an ACM beast! I want me one of these!
@jamieaulbach5120 Жыл бұрын
I worked in Air Force flight testing for 5 years and I can say they can make anything happen. Want a 120 to talk to Russian radar, it can be done if the resources are thrown at the problem.
@josephbell7994 Жыл бұрын
Enjoy your videos, keep up the good work...
@Davros-vi4qg Жыл бұрын
Yep, reckon they got a good chance, especially being back stopped with AWACS and possible the odd F35 🤔
@jakebennett4307 Жыл бұрын
You guys should do a conversation section sometime maybe if you had a long flight as part of a mission or just for fun
@DarkStriker1-1 Жыл бұрын
yes
@lightray706 Жыл бұрын
The technology is slightly better, but I'd say the key factor was humans fighting. As we saw in the us vs Russian air wings the human pilots were able to properly use the flankers supermaneuverablility and evade missiles.
@DripsDrop Жыл бұрын
Hey Cap, really good Sunday funday yesterday. Was sorry to miss you, hope all is well.
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed!
@TheOriginalFaxon Жыл бұрын
That strategy for losing radar lock, that's a new one! I'll have to remember that trick xD
@baziwan9407 Жыл бұрын
There was a block proposal to use the b1s bomb bay to carry a crap ton of missiles for raptors to use this concept.
@Stinger522 Жыл бұрын
The concept may live on with the B-21 Raider if it gets the AIM-260.
@robandcheryls Жыл бұрын
That was an awesome way to waste an hour, on a Monday Night. Love the banter boys 🇨🇦 Vet
@TerraZetzz Жыл бұрын
Think you guys could re-enact the first days of the Ukraine War particularly that crazy helicopter assault at Hostomel airport? I remember the videos of the helicopters getting shot at by MANPADS. You could challenge yourselves with KA-50's and Mi-8's trying to get to an airport avoiding MANPADS.
@9999plato Жыл бұрын
That is one scary missile. It's 100% passive. What you cannot see you cannot avoid or evade. They should have given it the code name Sniper.
@joegoveia6499 Жыл бұрын
I think you should do a SATAL competition within the grim reapers. Have a draft for picking teammates and go at it 3v3 4v4 etc. I love watching the SATAL platform as do so many others.
@twatts45 Жыл бұрын
After damp goes pop, he changes his name to damper sock
@caseydudzinski9422 Жыл бұрын
you have to make a video on how to get these modernized fighters!
@firmaneffendi2801 Жыл бұрын
Now if we combined with the PVO MiG-23's hit n run tactic, flying low high speed, pop up into unsespecting target (like R-23T or R-27ET do) but instead the T missile, we maddog the AIM-120D radar system and put the Su into defensive position, does it still work? I mean in the paper the answer might be yes, but what do you (GRs) think??
@Owallrich Жыл бұрын
f15 crew chief back again (sorry was on my work account on the last comment) pretty much sums it up stealth comes through paints a target f15s come in delivers high powered democracy
@LondonSteveLee Жыл бұрын
If only the US had democracy.
@milkoamorenoantelo3106 Жыл бұрын
Falklands, there was the Last Exocet and had 2 Super Etendard, so one turned the radar on minutes before target and the wingman shoot the missile, datalink would do more less samething?
@LondonSteveLee Жыл бұрын
No, an AWACS would be tracking the enemy plane from 250+ miles sending target data to the aircraft carrying the air-to-air missile. The fighter aircraft wouldn't have to go nose hot at all (unlike this sim) just launch the missile after the right launch parameters have been met. Of course computing on board the AWACS would be predicting where the target aircraft will be at intercept and will steer the remote AIM-120D there - not at the aircraft's current position - which would be silly.
@PSNGamer 11 ай бұрын
How do you go into the editor map view during the mission? I'm trying to figure it out but can't.
@cmdrcorvuscoraxnevermore3354 Жыл бұрын
Hello guys. Very interesting video. The tech you've simulated are most probably already researched. Given the US has samples of the old soviet aircraft (most probably) the avionics have been gone over with a fine tooth comb. Just a guess though. Fine video to Cap and his amazing flying squadron. I always enjoy your escapades!.
@RolleDA Жыл бұрын
Hey Cap. How many footage do you produce not showing us because of experiments you try are unsuccessful? And if there is any, might there be a chance to see a GR outtakes video?
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
It's mainly single player testing stuff, not very exciting.
@mrlodwick Жыл бұрын
Awesome, Chinese and beer for tea - with Capt and Co - I win !
@armymanaka360 Жыл бұрын
Video idea,can a single Vulcan bomber recreate the damage at Pearl harbour (I know the scenario is not realistic but I want to see how much damage a Vulcan can cause and I thought Pearl harbour would be good for it,if you have a better location forthe test then use it),if one doesn’t work you keep adding until Pearl harbour is nearly completely destroyed
@LondonSteveLee Жыл бұрын
Going by the Falklands the Vulcan had trouble getting a bomb anywhere near the target - not surprising as it was designed as a nuclear strike bomber.
@Rover200Power Жыл бұрын
I'm pretty sure a Blue Steel would do a bit of damage.
@LondonSteveLee Жыл бұрын
@@Rover200Power Yes, precisely my point - you don't/didn't need pin-point precision when dropping atomic bombs!
@Rover200Power Жыл бұрын
@@LondonSteveLee it's a shame they were neglected once the nuclear role moved to the subs. A few upgrades over the years and it could have made an effective bomber in the 80s and 90s.
@flutemangreg2581 Жыл бұрын
Not gonna lie, I would have listened to the "what if" tangent you guys had started.
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
hmmm don't want to start letting politics in. Just want to test the tech TBH.
@flutemangreg2581 Жыл бұрын
@@grimreapers Understandable especially for the content of this particular video and the current state of world affairs. I would not say the politics is the interest, I think most of my interest would be potential scenarios and realistic actions that could be taken. Few people are knowledgeable in modern air combat and combined arms fighting, so listening to essentially a thought experiment by people who are (or definitely more so than me) seems interesting. Also any additional knowledge with the way the world is today help you cut through the BS.
@hoghogwild Жыл бұрын
The Canadians are dropping Superhornet AN/APG-79 (V)4 radars and radomes into 36 its 94 CF-18s. They bought AIM-120D in 2017 (and were criticized for buying a missile which is limited by the jets radar) and will reach IOC with AIM-9X Block II next year. All 94 have just undergone HEP-1(Hornet Extension Project). JSOW is also quite the capability for the Canadians. The CF-18 will now serve through 2032(as the last of their 88 CF-35As are delivered), 50 years after it began operations with RCAF.
@LondonSteveLee Жыл бұрын
Yep, very wise use of resources. Spending billions on ultra sophisticated aircraft is just insane.
@Digi20 Жыл бұрын
I think the beauty of the old avionics software on legacy fighters could be that it is rather crude and easy to master software wise (example: today one guy can re-create an old SNES Game in a few days compared to a whole company taking months to do it 30 years ago). or on the hardware level, a rasberry pi having magnitudes more computer power than the whole plane and thus could easily "translate" between new and old. it should definitely be do-able to jury-rig modern missiles into the old planes, if you have people on hand that still know about the old systems.
@LondonSteveLee Жыл бұрын
Yes, in war time this stuff can be jerry-rigged pretty quickly. I wouldn't let the Ukrainians do it though - I'd hand over a complete package on an encrypted device - let the Ukrainians do the mechanical installation only - too much corruption over there - any technology sharing would also be shared with Moscow and Beijing pretty damn quick.
@scarcasmtincap2856 Жыл бұрын
Gonna have to run a HAAWC from the us. Pegasus? Maybe 3 non moving sub on the bottom of the baltic?
@Silo-Ren Жыл бұрын
Being an American patriotic it's almost a hard pill to swallow on just how beautiful those SU-27's are. While not being the best on our lot, I alway's had a great admiration for our F-16 Viper, like one pilot said it best, "you don't strap onto a F-16, it straps on to you. Thnx again Cap and gentlemen.
@rubiconnn Жыл бұрын
The only thing sexier than the Su27 is the B58 Hustler: Chrome paint✔ Delta wing ✔ Four jet engines ✔ Giant nuke strapped to the bottom ✔ Legit escape pods ✔
@dowgy177 Жыл бұрын
That's a great saying man. I'm now picturing a strapon shaped like an F-16.
@iantibbetts6823 Жыл бұрын
Jury-rigged means something was assembled quickly with the materials on hand. Jerry-built means it was cheaply or poorly built.
@vd00 Жыл бұрын
That Sock dude...seems so cuddly!
@totalnerd5674 Жыл бұрын
Very cuddly in bed...
@falcon9983 Жыл бұрын
I mean, I was enjoying the conversation lmao but im not right lol
@fox_the_apprentice Жыл бұрын
At 26:45 a different missile comes from bottom right and steals the kill :3
@MikeyNewman1974 Жыл бұрын
I just went POP!!!!!!
@lasselahti4056 Жыл бұрын
Btw, those are not gridfins, they are just fins. :) or Wings. Gridfins are those grillgrids that are in russian missiles, and space x rockets etc. (area is in normal towards airflow). I dunno how to explain this with my bad Rally-english.
@lasselahti4056 Жыл бұрын
IF I remember right, also Gripen is, or is supposed to be, able to fire missiles trough datalink... But dunno if that works with awacs, or if it does always need another "gripen" to show target.. (?) At least they can PICK targets from that link, but dont know does that need radar on in the airplane that shoots that target. Same thing with new Saa anti-ship missiles I think, and they can ofc targeted by ground forces also. (preprogrammed flightpath mode),
@delta182 Жыл бұрын
Will it let you go V1 with canopy open..?
@benrichey2593 Жыл бұрын
It seems like the main limiting factor is what we’re willing to let Russia get its hands on. Any tech we give them could end up getting captured if shot down, misfired or even from successful use. We’re probably OK losing 30-year old HARMs but probably not an AIM-120D.
@LondonSteveLee Жыл бұрын
AIM-120D is already behind the curve - the US put all it's eggs in the stealth basket and made a very expensive omelette. They desperately need Meteor NOW - but are scared to purchase it as AIM-260 would be cancelled.
@davidgermain Жыл бұрын
could you put f35 sensor packs on a NASA space plane and datalink that? something like x37B. the F35 visual sensor has the range and at that angle would see down valleys.
@tinto278 Жыл бұрын
RAAF are all over this and are a 5th gen air force moving to a 6th gen air force with the USAF, USMC, USN and RAF. Loyal wingman is a system that can take sensors eg Radar, EW, IR, etc and place them on UCAV's The replacement for the Growler is going to be 3 loyal wingman with the growler systems spread over the 3 aircraft using electro optics/space for communications. Starlink will be the biggest game changer and will end up replacing AEW&C's. AUKUS! les go son! 💪💪💪 NGAD, Tempest and Ghost Bat.
@alexandruraresdatcu Жыл бұрын
rudssian radars with russian crews were guiding russian pilots in fighters in the korean war shooting down US planes and US did not go nuclear...
@Estuardomendez13 Жыл бұрын
Theres a concept for a vtail b1b lancer thats just a massive aim120 missile truck
@totalnerd5674 Жыл бұрын
That was on the Military History Channel, right? The B-1R?
@totalnerd5674 Жыл бұрын
Also, imagine ramjet A2A missiles instead of just AIM-120Ds... THAT would be insane.
@mgplaying8435 Жыл бұрын
Wouldn´t it be easy to jam the missiles from this distance?
@salmon4749 Жыл бұрын
the su 35 also uses the r-77M with a range of 193km
@RainbowDash-vy2dn Жыл бұрын
how did grump get his canopy back after take-off? XD
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
We re-started closer to target.
@k1lluachan Жыл бұрын
now with meteors =)
@Endermage1244 Жыл бұрын
I liked that conversation at 12 minutes. Shouldn't of cut it off.
@DavidBrown-yd9le Жыл бұрын
Hi Cap I saw a video about a B1R missile truck
@DavidBrown-yd9le Жыл бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fKyjjMZ8mtK7ooU.html
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Cool
@OctaviusRomulus Жыл бұрын
I'd love to listen to a GR podcast of geopolitical commentary... just sayin'
@darwinism8181 Жыл бұрын
As other people have said there's already US AWACs around Ukraine. But they're pretty certainly just being used for a kind of indirect support role; what they see and hear is being passed on to Ukrainian forces. I don't think there's any chance of them being used to actively direct missiles even if all the other technical hurdles were overcome. It'd be a much more active role in the war (even though our current role is really debatably 'passive') and even though Putin's use of nukes is pretty certainly an incredibly dumb bluff I don't think the US wants to open up its AWACs to getting R-37s thrown at them. Not to mention Russia is doing plenty shittily even without the US guiding missiles to planes.
@user-mz5lr7zx4s Жыл бұрын
Где можно скачать этот мод ??
@opachki923 Жыл бұрын
Link to the mod?
@aamcgarr Жыл бұрын
Sure for the 3 they have left // Sounds like a plan
@andrewrogers3067 Жыл бұрын
One thing I’ve noticed the more I’ve been studying Fights is that the missile is more important then the plane.
@LondonSteveLee Жыл бұрын
This was evident over 20 years ago - which is why the hideously complex and expensive stealth programme should have been scrapped.
@fulcrum2951 Жыл бұрын
@@LondonSteveLee which is why countries are researching and developing stealth Not like you need to first detect your targets before launching the missile eh?
@LondonSteveLee Жыл бұрын
@@fulcrum2951 Things have moved on massively, real-time RADAR (and IR) return data-processing is a massive game changer. Processing 10 seconds worth of RADAR return data looking for tiny constants would have taken a 500 ton football-pitch-sized computer installation a week in 1990 burning a hundred kilowatts of energy per hour, this processing power is now real-time, will fit in a cigarette packet and burn perhaps 40 watts. This is why stealth is dead and it’s also why we carry on offshoring our technology to China at our peril. RADAR stealth is dead - pointless expense and complexity. If you haven't worked out the military industry is about selling ideas and making money first and foremost then that's why you don't get it. Minimising your RCS is sensible - anything beyond that now has a massive levels of diminished returns (‘scuse the pun) for dollars spent. You’d be far, far better off having more airframes, pilots and better, smarter weapons - and drones. Simple single task drones not like the money-pits the US and British defence industries are wasting billions on - we’re repeating the F-22/F-35 mistake with drones!
@fulcrum2951 Жыл бұрын
@@LondonSteveLee none of what you stated has said stealth is dead Only your conclusion is and its a wrong one. And as i said before, why are countries researching and improving stealth if its "dead"?
@fulcrum2951 Жыл бұрын
@@LondonSteveLee also you sound like those people who say the tank is dead because anti tank weapons exist
@musicmaker99 Жыл бұрын
He's called Pootin, not Pyewtin, just so you know!
@stepbruv8780 Жыл бұрын
Putin : Write that down! Write that down!
@Aikibiker1 Жыл бұрын
Could the AIM-120 get data from a NASAMS or IRIS-T? Both of which Ukraine has, or will have soon.
@willjones5638 Жыл бұрын
Ukraine went to Brazil to look at the super tacanno. Can you do a vid on Taccano's in Ukraine ? Thinking more current date now that the Russian IADS is depleted enough for Air to Ground.
@winelive5500 Жыл бұрын
Cap, I don’t think the Hercules will have a AIM120D/AIM260 ‘rapid dragon’ capability, it’s still not survivable enough given the stand-off range isn’t long enough compared to the palletised JASM-ER etc Rapid Dragon trials. I believe a smarter use of the cargo planes would be to launch half a dozen or so loyal wingman drones from stand-off range that are fighter setup with the AIM120/260 or even Half Rams they are developing and have them launch midway to target. And a couple of F35 loitering in closer to guide them
@thaum1 Жыл бұрын
LMAO @12.40 just as the conversation was getting interesting, "The valued viewers are here for boom, boom". HAHA, what a way to kill the conversation. Handled that like a boss Cap.
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Look at me shut the boys down!
@thaum1 Жыл бұрын
@@grimreapers Indeed. Cut out all the chit-chat. Great vid by the way. Keep it up.
@LondonSteveLee Жыл бұрын
If this works without any other electronics then why doesn't. F-22 carry at least one AIM-120D? (to be guided in by AWAC) there's more to this datalink than just mounting the missile.
@deanfirnatine7814 Жыл бұрын
The beat up barely flying Putin was so appropriate considering the condition of Russia's military at the moment, lol🤣
@janusz4156 Жыл бұрын
45 years of Su-27.
@strambino1 Жыл бұрын
What if it was a stealth F 35 giving the data link information to the SU 27? If it’s an f35B it can takeoff from anywhere.
@LondonSteveLee Жыл бұрын
Great idea - if stealth worked. Longer wavelength ground RADAR would be tracking it perfectly like any other aircraft.
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Yes this could work potentially.
@Anarchy_420 Жыл бұрын
Lmao It would have been cool if you put Putin in MIG-31 with R-37M's lol like a bad guy boss in a video game😆👍
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Yeh should have.
@Anarchy_420 Жыл бұрын
@@grimreapers next time ;)
@kouroshmardani9719 Жыл бұрын
mod name?
@terminatorwintair5994 Жыл бұрын
basically nothing about the V1 explanation was correct. He described the maximum brake energy speed, not V1
@LondonSteveLee Жыл бұрын
You're right about how air to air combat is going - remotely directed sophisticated weapons on fast bomb trucks - this was obvious 25 years ago and is why the hideously complex stealth programme should have been cancelled. I said when Concorde was withdrawn they should be bought up by the MoD and turned into stand-off A2A and A2G weapons delivery platforms.
@The_Texan_American Жыл бұрын
During WW2 if the US hadn’t dropped the nukes on Japan, the original plan was a full on invasion of the mainland. I wonder if you guys could simulate that somehow? 🤔 At the time Japan still had TONS of aircraft and would have kamikaze all of the incoming ships carrying the soon to be invading Allie’s. Resulting deaths would’ve been catastrophic.
@crabluva Жыл бұрын
Japan didn't have any aviators or the fuel to get their planes off the ground. The planning for the invasion was based around suppression of enemy air defense, which would be completely filling the sky with flak. I don't know what there would be to simulate...the Grim Reapers would get shot down a lot and destroy a decent amount of AA. Japan didn't have many aircraft by summer 1945...check your sources again. They didn't even have many aviation instructors left. The Cape Gloucester Campaign was the last time the Japanese used aviation effectively I believe? Once Rabul was neutralized that was the end of the IJN. Raids on Rabaul would be really interesting. There was actually a "reverse Pearl Harbor" there, with half a dozen irreplaceable ships being sunk.
@nickolajlarsenzarechnov5556 Жыл бұрын
Aaah yes the takeoff could have been beter just like the 406😏
@garyg3468 Жыл бұрын
DATALINK LIVES!!!
@garnetmichel5517 Жыл бұрын
Putin was Ex KGB
@LondonSteveLee Жыл бұрын
Given India's issue with the simpler older RADAR onboard SU-30 (it simply doesn't work as a fighter RADAR above mach 1!) and the fact the Russians couldn't fix it leaving the IAF in the do do (which is what really lead to India dropping out of SU-57) the likelihood of SU-35s RADAR being much good is slim. China have invested heavily in Russian technology - the result? In a red flag with Thailand, Thai Gripens wiped the floor with the Chinese in BVR engagements - 42-0 - and that's with relatively hopeless block C AMRAAM. Being Russian, DCS pretends all this junk actually works - great for gaming but not for real war.
@dampsok Жыл бұрын
We pretend that Kuznetsov sails under her own power...
@LondonSteveLee Жыл бұрын
@@dampsok HA! True - Tug power!
@jakk222rem Жыл бұрын
Haven't watched the video yet so I'll make my prediction now. The aim-120 and aim-9 will not be able to defeat the Russian planes as they are air-to-air weapons, not air-to-ground.
@guillermogomez8521 Жыл бұрын
I think it’s very possible that Putin says fuck it I’m do it myself like harry tasker in true lies 😂😂😂😂😂
@ohgoshtro Жыл бұрын
This is why I like the flanker you can dump so many thing on it. Also a moron I know how can gamers have any power 😆. The DoD should watch these videos you insane captain.
@RenzoDelRey Жыл бұрын
3
@heynow3788 Жыл бұрын
Hero of Soviet Union! That is some funny stuff 🤣
@sonar357 Жыл бұрын
Ukrainians could use this method in long-range ambush tactics against Russian aircraft, such as Tu-22M bombers lobbing cruise missiles from within Russia. That would be a game changer
@totalnerd5674 Жыл бұрын
They could shoot down the cruise missiles, but it would be easier to just use NASAMS to do that instead.
@sonar357 Жыл бұрын
@@totalnerd5674 Or maybe a one-two ambush. NASAMS from the ground and AIM-120's from the air?
@totalnerd5674 Жыл бұрын
@@sonar357 Yes, but the NASAMs firing AIM-120Cs would use less jet fuel. After all, you likely aren't going to be hitting anything other than the cruise missiles, as the bombers fire them well within safe distances. Unless the Russians are far less careful than I give them credit for, which is well within possibility...
@sturmanaskie Жыл бұрын
NATO has been using awacs 24/7 against Russia from the start of the war this isn’t new, this is why Russian aviation is having such a hard time
@LondonSteveLee Жыл бұрын
Along with Predators and refuelling aircraft carrying advanced sensor packages.
@LondonSteveLee Жыл бұрын
Indeed R-77M isn't in service - but the AWACS killer R-37 is. Russian could shoot down NATO AWACS at extended ranges (250-300 miles) - if we can't jam them.
@Sup3r6f0ur Жыл бұрын
Ummm... They don't exactly need them to defeat an SU35. It just makes the kill ratio favor the Ukrainians heavily lol
Grim Reapers
Рет қаралды 1,9 М.
Grim Reapers
Рет қаралды 91 М.
Grim Reapers
Рет қаралды 55 М.
The Tyrant
Рет қаралды 437
Growling Sidewinder
Рет қаралды 144 М.
BattleBots
Рет қаралды 90 М.
Grim Reapers
Рет қаралды 295 М.
Grim Reapers
Рет қаралды 83 М.
Grim Reapers
Рет қаралды 83 М.
Grim Reapers
Рет қаралды 59 М.
Grim Reapers
Рет қаралды 61 М.
GH'S
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН