I thought he meant "my head"

"Best" ?... nice indeed... but when he was showing the sky, were you just looking at his finger ? :-) Friendly...

@@giovannifalso6342 this is not a mistake. That was joke about his senile balding.

agree 😊

Luco Zade But audience was dead😥

Harsh accent for people who might never heard him before

actually he is armenian ))) see what "armenian radio" or "Radio Yerevan jokes" is ))) - it's a mem in ex-USSR

As a chess player, this makes me like him even more

Try watching Ben Finegold lecture about chess sometime. Grandmasters can be funny too!

epSos.de i

...or a debt collector from Glasgow.

Garry is a legend, and he is a great speaker too. He nearly has zero Russian accent though...

There are some rumours of him being a gangster actually.

He says no in British.

I would agree to a certain point, he is so passionate, engaging, motivating and creative. But when you see his political activity or the cult around his person you might find out that a perfect person does not exist, and some people might actually hate him (not me though :D).

hate? why?.. beacause he does not support Putin?... is this enough? may be he is not the smartest polititian, but why hate for that

beautifull girl

blabla62871 so you're thinking I'm fake. Explain then

rao zain you're an idiot

Amit Bhattrai truee :)

It is amazing to see a person who is such a genius in terms of pure mind, but so misguided in politics.

@Stranger Happened Ooooor... :P

why is kasparov misguided in politics?

1. "Misguided" because he has become corporate establishment neolib tool, smearing Bernard Sanders during the primaries, he also supported corrupt war monger Hillary Clinton. 2. "Putin dictatorship" is much less of dictatorship versus the USA where Obama, unlike Putin, has repeatedly used military force without parliamentarian approval, and ordered to murder citizens of the country without a trial (at least two of such cases were confirmed by the Obama administration, including the murder of 16 year old lad via a drone strike).

Heh. A "too busy thinking about whether they could to think about whether they should" moment ;)

:DDDDD

Those movies were made by people too though

Then you watch movies with pc or phones

@@oliverupload or were they? *vsauce music plays*

What a pimp

This whole thing might be the reason to point that out again 😂

To be honest years have passed between the matches, and the algorithm was constantly developed during that time. So winning the first match was not against the same machine as the one that beat Kasparov in '97.

@@beerkenstein True, but having watched about a dozen videos by grandmasters and international masters analyzing both matches assisted with modern engines and decades of peer analysis, both of the games themselves and the situation surrounding the matches with Kasparov and ibm, it seems to me most gms believe that Kasparov was still the stronger player even in 1997. Of special note is game 6 in their second match when kasparov knowingly and very intentionally played into an opening trap, believing incorrectly that deep blue would be too materialistic to make the required sacrifice to capitalize. Had he been playing against any top human GM of his time he never would have played into that well known losing line. Modern consensus seems to be that Kasparov stuck a bit too stubbornly to his anti-computer tactics learned from the ‘96 match he won against deep blue. He was also possibly beset by the idea that deep blue may have been assisted by human gms, a notion that was denied by ibm and that neither modern gms nor Kasparov himself believe today anymore, but the suspicion itself may have had an impact on the way he approached the match.

No smart difinetly not a philosopher , nothing just some ... Old man traching talk to be the next russai brisident witch he will not become literally 😂 ?!...

​@@user-je1ck6vw7gur just an idot

And an enemy of the evil tyranny.

Damn machines, masquerading around as former chess masters and the like. I ain't falling for it!

MediaMan that's true, how shall we tell the difference :O

MayainWonderland Do we have to tell them apart, if we are to combine our best?

Tony Kunnari If we were to work together, nothing could stand in our way

MayainWonderland Except the next level entity which is one step ahead, if any exists that is.

It was only considered a supercomputer at the time but its weak asf compared to today

Why has nobody responded to this comment? It's a clever one!

Amen!

G_Guy001 but there maybe one day the computer chooses exactly what reason it has been developed for, for itself...

I agree, but the initial conditions and learning are important. For example, an intelligent flying machine with the latest weaponry capabilities that's been programmed to annihilate specific patterns it detects on the ground is different than an intelligent machine that's been built to manage a vertical farm.

They want the $$$. I just hope machines don't get out of hand and take over everything, or if they do, that I'll be long gone and not have to suffer from it.

Same with the laws. The law it self is good, but some people who enforced it are corrupt and useless

@@tomo4977 kkkk

I know I consider myself bilingual but went to check the dictionary a couple times

It's probably because he was pretty much a human phenomenon around the entire world, in his prime he was as a chess player considered completely unassailable, the only one to give him a run for his money was another Russian. And so of course it was not only the Soviets but Americans, French and many others who were interested in him as a player.

He moved to New York City in 2013.

He is the GOAT of Chess.

People like him are world citizens

Or they think that his passion for technology is naive. Some people have bitter experiences with technology, like being fired from their job during the process of automization. I do not say these people are right, but their reaction might be very understandable ;)

that's a fair point, but at least give it a listen before you give it a like or dislike.

Hurr Durr I will dislike this video, look how edgy am i !! *giggles

Irony is that often thumbs down are made by bots.

And yet no one ever complains about likes before people have watched the full video

GuyWithAnAmazingHat and how about automation?

GuyWithAnAmazingHat Go watch "Singularity - Humanitys last invention"

I noticed the difference of views too,which I find quite annoying because the main reason(one of,but imo the most important) why the west dominates in term of QOL and economy is because of advancements in technology(before the industrial revolution China was a bigger and better country than anyone in the west but after that UK and western Europe advanced rapidly). You can see this view of the opinion on technology on the adaptations of Ghost in the Shell.The Japanese version has progressive views and technology is used in humans advantaged,but (from what I heard, I couldn't bring myself to watch that movie) the western adaptation in the end rejects technology advantage and value individualism and traditionalism more.

very nice prospective. I never saw it that way O.o' thank you for teaching me and making me smarter ^^

machine dystopia is a self-fulfilling prophecy if anything. if you teach humans to fear their own creations for no reason, then that is what is going to end up antagonising them. also, lol at all the triggered westerners in this thread

He cute as hecc He gets all the respecc But most important *he wins his title bacc*

I came to the conclusion that it's pointless arguing with people like that, they're nuts! If they don't like technology fine, go live on a cave and leave progress for us

@@viniciusornelas2160 - So you want a Social Credit system like China and to live in a transhumanist technocracy dominated by the 2%. Good on you.

@@brycer985 it's impressive how people nowdays don't understand/don't get irony XD the world is trully batshit crazy

@@viniciusornelas2160 - I personally for one dont want the government to decide on driverless cars because of euphamistic terms like "Safety" and conveiniance. I dont want big brother micromanaging me. But you think people are batshit crazy for questioning this?

@@viniciusornelas2160 - Welcome to your Smart cities program. Just embrace it. I think Kasparov is a communist. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/abaijJqfq8jbcY0.html

"this guy" lmao

he's not just "a guy". it's garry kasparov. one of the best chess players to ever exist and had the calculations of a computer.

I know right? He should thinking about pursuing chess career since he 's while good at it.

Gogglesaurus lol I just rewatched despicable me and that's immediately what came to mind

Gogglesaurus - Yes

I CAN'T UNHEAR

Argus FPV Gru sounds like him *

i feel like he IS Gru maybe he actually is the actor for gru lol

You'd be surprised how many people in his homeland - Russia hate him and call him an idiot or even a traitor. Mostly because of his political activism and views.

@@kosmosyche No, that doesn't surprise me. But then again, that whole country is completely off its rockers...

@@kosmosyche Not even true. Many people agree with him.

@@Martvandelay Say that after your country will stop to spread "democracy" in the middle east

What is not true? Many people do agree with him, and I didn't say otherwise. But many people do hate him for his views, so where's the untrue part?

still half of his talk seems like btthurt stuff. :D

They used an engine though…

@@zoetje9817 i mean you are not wrong.

😂👍

why do you think his ego crushed?

@@oleksiistarodub1122 never most a match before, has an ego the size of the universe itself, of course he was crushed.

underrated comment. up you go.

😂😂

Garry Kasparov = Gru

Actually he kind of sounds like these guys kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rNSFqZWXzazdZXk.html

Nice pp

Wtf is your pfp...

now you can't unhear it

Maybe Steve Carrell could play Kasparov in his biopic

Absolutely, but at that point Artificial intelligence will be on an insane level.

well if you interrupt him when he's thinking about chess match , you won't see your family ever again

He seems like a really cool and chill person, would love to hang out with him. I recommend this video on Deep Blue(the machine he fought against) VS Garry Kasparov, it's a great watch if tou want to get an in-depth insight:- kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ft12ZZVqupjGkWw.html

What if a machine might do though would they probably not even like the company of their creators instead of dread and despise it? If a machine reached that level of intelligence i have my doubts that "It" would at some point do this with reason Im more worried that a higher level computer like that will be abused by future humans and result in a biological thinking machine wich despises us with reason

You have hit upon one of dozens of problems with general AI, all of which are being worked on, and in all likelihood (barring the destruction or stagnation of humankind) will almost inevitably be overcome. General AI, as I understand it, can come in two forms, the sapient AI that thinks exactly like humans, but faster (which unless we upgrade ourselves with better intelligence we would be fools to ever create) or the perfect slave, programmed to have general intelligence, but not mind being ordered around. whether it is possible to create the perfect slave general AI, without it going catastrophically wrong, is a question I can't answer, as I don't know if you can implement all the necessary safeguards that would prevent, say, the AI killing all humans for resources and plastering the universe with molecular smiley faces, without those safeguards making it so indistinguishable from humanity that we are forced to treat it as sapient. Your spot on Holdthedoor.

chadoftoons That won't happen for a long long time. We are far off from creating a machine that could function anywhere close to that. I'm sure the humans in the future that do invent something like that will make sure to have the necessary precautions in place.

If we ever create an AI which can reach to that level of the biological intelligence, how do we even distinguish ourselves aren't being programmed too? I mean, if we ever capable of making something with the emotional and conscious equivalent to human ( assuming they can even dream whatever we could dream of as humans.) We may just be another machine with a different structure of mathematics to compose of.

We are already machines. We just happen to be stupidly designed carbon based machines with a few million years of debugging.

Good point. We're going to have to find a way to prophylactically deal with the changes these intelligent machines are going to have on our society, economy and our own bodies. Or we will not be able to advance enough culturally to deal with them and that could be a major contributing factor to the so called fall of man and rise of machines.