Because the Tucson and the Sportage have the same platform, which was stated at the beginning of the video!

@@Christian17390 He didn’t say they weren’t he said the bumper structure is different we will definitely affect the pedestrian impact!

Kia, but they use the tucson for some parts because they are sister companies and cars. Sportage and Tuscon are build on the same platform, same tech, engines and safety features. Like a VW Tiguan and Seat Ateca. Or Peugeot 208 and Opel Corsa

this is uglyer car in the world , and useless car in the world

@@Med1um_Gamer en işe yaramaz araba wolksvagen Tiguan 💩kia çok daha iyi

No, cambian motorizaciones y equipamiento, el ensamble tampoco es el mismo pero no me creas a mi, investiga en Google, la versión europea no es la misma de la india

the tuscon and sportage share the same platform and some safety features, so some results will be based off of those of the tuscon.

Impressive that you've learned to write without knowing how to read.

Cause they're basicly the same cars built on the same platform, only with diffrent styling.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qs10gLuinc-uppc.htmlsi=qjDZObrlE7Njszf6

Hyundai owns Kia

same brand same platform same car

​@@japanquakeytp?

The rating is higher based on what trauma the occupants have not the car. If the car is intact but the occupants dead there is no use... just buy old lada if you think that way.

@@andreimihailescu6805 If a tree is going through your head you can’t really speak about an advantage. EuroNCAP is interpreting ONLY the results in ONE specific scenario: The test does not reflect or extrapolate to higher crash speeds. Be ensured that at +10km/h crash speed the results would be totally different. Maybe you have a more “comfortable” crash at 40km/h, but will be dead at 50km/h… And no: A Lada has absolutely no rigid structure. It will totally collapse in such tests.

@@ytuberization lol, care to explain a little further how NCAP doesn't know how to test cars? You do know the i4 got 4 stars mainly because BMW suck at including safety equipment as standard as they like to have it as (very) expensive extras. Granted, all carmakers want you to pay for the safety equipment but some make it available in the most basic trims which is always what NCAP tests - the basic trim. And it is evident that the koreans are pretty good at including proper electronic safety tech even in basic trims. And yes, it is embarrasing that a Hyundai Tucson has more and/or better electronic safety measures in it than a basic trim BMW i4 in its basic trim, but it is the reality of today. Asian cars are becoming better at a rate that should have european manufactorers upset. People like to talk about hardware I guess, but in the field of software, wouldn't surprise me one bit of the koreans match or exceed the germans in that regard. As for the crash test itself, no you cannot eyeball it and make any conclusions on that. No serious engineer works that way. NCAP do consider all the things you accuse them of not considering, appearantly because you didn't like the result the i4 got. Tell you what, putting on show BMWs two recent "duds" is a good thing, not a bad one. It is what is going to force BMW to accept becoming the new Peugeot in safety - that is, one that slanders behind - or improving upon it to the level that it matches its competitors.

Read the description

Impressive, now learn to read :P

I started reading after noticing the Tuscan 😅😂

@@mharoonrs Good, then read the text in description or the first 5sec of the video.. Also, not hard to notice when it reads on the screen when Hyundai was used.

@@eerolz8758 Well I noticed and commented because it doesn't match the video title though. I didn't read the description. I was randomly scrolling the videos. I still haven't read the video description for your information.

It gets 5 stars because NCAP assess how well the driver is protected, not how the impact absorbtion zones look. I am by no means an expert, just a layman, but sometimes crumbling of specific parts can even be intentional to absorb the energy and direct it away from the passengers. Doesn't matter of the car looks like shit as long as it directs the energy of impact away from the poor sod's spine. NCAP use sensors to meassure damage done to the dolls. They also look at the hull to make inferences about the cars performance real life.

@@emilsohn1671 Every time I write this under EuroNCAP test, someone writes this text back. Have you noticed, this test speed is 32 km/h? If it looks very bad at this low speed, then at 64 km/h same crash, this thing splits into two halves and all will be dead. EuroNCAP problem is, they turned into woke and do not test real safety anymore. All electronic gizmos are more important now, than real security.

@@SiiliViin I agree with you but maybe a pole impact at 60km/h is less realistic because of it being just a pole. I think a vehicle going that fast is more likely. The mobile barrier impact at 60km/h right before it which seems more realistic.

Sportage and Tucson are the same cars.

It's intentional and it's part of the crash structure. If you don't watch Formula 1, new formulas are extremely safe but they dramatically dissolve into pieces during a crash on purpose to spread the g forces and protect the human as much as possible. It might look scary and bad, but it's intentional and it's gonna make you safer

Sus