I would call Dr James White Defender of the biblical faith that was once delivered to the saints.

Thanks God for this. This message is powerful, not because brother James White, but because of the scriptures the word of God.

" Because by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy."-Hebrews 10:14.

great message Dr White, always great thankyou.

Awesome! Thank you! I came out of Catholicism because of preaching like this. I can’t recall ever hearing a priest read or expound on the incredible verses in Hebrews , and I sure know why! Jesus’s one sacrifice for sins forever is sufficient for all who believe! Praise God!

Roman Catholicism has a lot of errors. I grew up as a Roman Catholic. I studied in a Roman Catholic school. I remember when I was a kid my grandmother would be paying the staff of the Roman Catholic church in our town to pray for her dead husband and relatives. I would sneak in the service and see to it that the priest will pray for my dead loved ones because my grandmother paid for it. Even as a kid, I could sense that there's something wrong in their doctrines. Later on, I served in a Roman Catholic church in our town during my high school days. I was about to enter a Roman Catholic seminary in order to become a priest. I had a lot of questions because I've seen many errors in their doctrines and practices. Those things are questionable. But thank God, even before becoming a Protestant, He guided me. He led me out of Roman Catholicism. I will never return to the Roman Catholic church. It has a lot of errors in their doctrines and practices. While I respect my Roman Catholic friends, I also share with them the Truth. Hopefully, they would leave Roman Catholicism as well. 😊 Bad Theology of Roman Catholicism: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mpeojbeBvp-cf5c.html

I have learnt so much from Dr White and I'm an ex Catholic since 2014/15... I am a saved bible reading Christian now, I can't get through to my family who won't give up their RC religion, however most don't even attend church or get communion or take confession, I believe they want to remain in RC so they can be buried in their local church where all of or family have been buried...please pray for my mother, I worry she will go to hell, along with my brother and sister who are lost.

Brother James love the bow tie Please please keep telling preaching truth

In the name of Jesus l thank our God and Father for you my dear brother. You are relentless and I love and admire you for it. You cannot beat straightforward truth and honesty. I pray God will continue to bless you and your loved ones.

What I love about Dr White is his accurate representations of other faiths and beliefs. You don’t get this from some preachers but James is honest and genuine when he describes other religions

Thank you Dr. White. I’m a cradle Catholic who left the RC Catholic Church 5 years ago. The Eucharist wasn’t my reason for leaving, but it was something that gave me doubts. I felt it was used as a way to control the behavior of their members. The faithful had to abide by the laws of the church or be denied communion, i.e. a woman who left her abusive husband & remarried without being granted the permission of the church was banned from receiving communion. Yet unholy “priests” who raped children, and the bishops who protected them from prosecution acting “in persona Christi” was deeply disturbing. So grateful I was able to walk away when I did.

I’m a Catholic and I’ve listened to Rev White for many years. I’m still a Catholic.

Sola Scriptura, the source of all wisdom. Maranatha! God Bless...

Excellent! 🙌🏼

praise God for his faithful servants. i am forever grateful to God for sound expository teacher like James White.

Jesus Christ and His death and resurrection was the Perfect Person performing the Perfect Work!

“He is able to save” - Praise God thank you Lord

This was tremendous

The Best

Great theologian

I pray to God, that all who are CALLED, are not lost.

What insight! What a great high priest have we. What a great salvation.

An excellent and enlightening teaching... Thanks Mr James White.

James - Beware of a critical spirit There is a significant difference between helping someone improve and having a critical spirit. A critical spirit is never pleased. A critical spirit expects and finds disappointment wherever it looks. It is the opposite of 1 Corinthians 13: a critical spirit arrogantly judges, is easily provoked, accounts for every wrong, and never carries any hope of being pleased. Such an attitude damages the critiqued as well as the critic.

“If Jesus could’ve gave us a better gift than the Eucharist, he would’ve done so. St John Vianney

How can you explain the Eucharistical miracles in the Roman Catholic Church?

Amen !

The ending, when he contrasted the 2 NT uses of "anamnesis," moved me to tears. Dr. White is such a brilliant theologian. I was, however, a bit surprised by 2 apparent mistakes he made regarding Yom Kippur (the Day of Atonement). First, the high priest did not wear his ornate clothing when he went into the holy of holies, but only the plain white linen dress of the common priest. Second, there is no way at all that anyone cleaned the blood off the mercy seat! The blood itself was for the very purpose of cleansing. Also, anyone who touched the Ark would die; if anyone other than the high priest went behind the veil, he would die; if the high priest went in on any other day, he would die; if he went in an extra time, even on Yom Kippur, he would die; if he went in without blood, he would die. Contrast all of that, as Hebrews does, with the free access we have to the "throne of grace" in Jesus Christ!

Amen ! Hebrews 10:14

Thank you, thank you, thank you Dr. White for sharing this message. You and Dr. Gavin Ortlund have been extremely helpful explaining how Roman Catholics do not comprehend Christ's substitutionary atonement as the Apostle Paul writes about in Romans 3 as well as the author of Hebrews. It takes much study and prayer over all the Scriptures to get an understanding of the gospel message in order to be able to share it with others. In addition to what you shared in this message why transubstantiation does not work because of the letter to the Hebrews, Jesus would not have lead his followers into violating the Law as stating in Leviticus 17:10-12. Jesus was setting up the cup and bread as representing his sacrifice on the cross as a memorial ceremony as opposed to leading his followers into violating the Law. Jesus was sacrificed on Passover for a purpose. At the first Passover when the blood of the lamb was spread onto the doorpost and lintel then those inside the home were covered by the blood of the lamb and the angel of death passed over their home. For those who have believed upon Jesus as the Christ, the Son of God, he is their Passover Lamb as they are now covered by the blood of Jesus and are saved from the second death. Amen!!

Hebrews 7:25-27 Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them. (26) For such an high priest became us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and made higher than the heavens; (27) Who needeth not daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifice, first for his own sins, and then for the people's: for this he did once, when he offered up himself.

All Catholic teachings point to an insufficiency of the atonement. There is no insufficiency in reality but Catholicism seeks to create one

Confusion of those who were from the faith but broke away. Beware of those sect. This is one of them!!!!

This year's g3 seems to be amazing!! Thank you for all of the effort to post these words of humility and grace.

"He saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit,". Titus 3: 5 "For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith-and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God- not by works, so that no one can boast.". Ephesians 2: 8-9 "All of us have become like one who is unclean, and all our righteous acts are like filthy rags; we all shrivel up like a leaf, and like the wind our sins sweep us away.". Isaiah 64: 6

Sincere question. Jesus shed physical blood on the cross. What kind of blood did Jesus sprinkle on the heavenly altar?

Great message, Dr. White. Joel Webbon has a great sermon out there that talks about the unjustness of the universal atonement position. John MacArthur also has a great sermon on the limited atonement overall, but includes discussing the mercy seat itself, the hilasterion. When you factor in the fact that the Greek original text of "all" does not refer to all people, as anti-Calvinists claim, but refers to all time, that removes a defense the universal atonement theory. The verses are used frequently in that way by anti-calvinists in this ignorance aggregation of a medium.

The last 1 minute 🤯

What debate was he speaking of? Is there a link?

Remember we that eve, when, the Last Supper spread, Christ, as we all believe, the Lamb, with leavenless bread, among His brethren shared, and thus the Law obeyed, of all unto their sire declared. The typic Lamb consumed, the legal Feast complete, the Lord unto the Twelve His Body gave to eat; the whole to all, no less the whole to each did mete with His own hands, as we confess. He gave them, weak and frail, His Flesh, their Food to be; on them, downcast and sad, His Blood bestowed He: and thus to them He spake, "Receive this Cup from Me, and all of you of this partake." So He this Sacrifice to institute did will, and charged His priests alone that office to fulfill: to them He did confide: to whom it pertains still to take, and the rest divide. Thus Angels' Bread is made the Bread of man today: the Living Bread from heaven with figures dost away: O miraculous gift indeed! the poor and lowly may upon their Lord and Master feed. Thee, therefore, we implore, O Godhead, One in Three, so may Thou visit us as we now worship Thee; and lead us on Thy way, That we at last may see the light wherein Thou dwellest aye.

I doubt any Roman Catholic priest in the whole world, preaches on what James White believes

Wow what great information to be learned. Thanks Jimmy White.

“Jesus held his body in his hands at the last supper.” St Augustine

The problem I see with Mr whites teachings is that he stays on the word, where Catholicism goes inside the word and brings the word out through faith and practices. Thats truly the beauty, it’s the physical open Bible as you walk inside a Catholic mass revealing the spiritual.While Mr White stays reading the menu hungry, Catholics are enjoying the meal. Praise be Jesus Christ!

Talking as if he's older than the apostles. What's the blood group of Jesus? Ciuld you pl elaborate?

The Eucharistic sacrifice is the actualisation of Jesus‘ once and for all one and only sacrifice. Christ‘s death on the cross - His sacrifice- is so vitally important that it is remembered in every mass. John 6 “whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood..” The speaker is misunderstanding Catholic doctrine.

King James Bible: Heb 10:12, “But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God.” Catholic NAB Bible: Heb 10:12, “But this one offered one sacrifice for sins, and took his seat forever at the right hand of God.” The King James Bible says Jesus Christ offered one sacrifice for sins forever, THEN SAT DOWN….The Catholic NAB Bible says that Jesus Christ offered one sacrifice for sins, THEN FOREVER SAT DOWN… So if Jesus Christ forever sat down, how is he coming down thousands of times on Catholic altars every day? And how is he coming back ever, if he sat down forever? So you see that it does matter which Bible you believe. We are told in 2 Tim 2:15, “Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” The Catholic NAB and most other versions take out “study”. They inset: Be eager to present yourself or be diligent. They don’t want anyone to study the word of God. I hope this helps someone to compare spiritual things with spiritual things.

where is the refutation i want my 45 mins back

Amen, brother White! ✝️✊🏻I'm an ex-Catholic myself.

What about (symbolic)experiential re-creating of the Last Supper, the eucharist, a reminder, as Jesus said " Do this in remembrance of Me."

hebrews should be read every year

If Rome is wrong then St. Cyril is wrong and if St. Cyril is incorrect then you have just overturned the entire council of Ephesus and allowed Satan to triumph over the Church.

Westminster Confession of 1646: Of the Lord's Supper II. In this sacrament, Christ is not offered up to His Father; nor any real sacrifice made at all, for remission of sins of the quick or dead, (Hbr 9:22, 25-26, 28); but only a commemoration of that one offering up of Himself, by Himself, upon the cross, once for all: and a spiritual oblation of all possible praise unto God, for the same, (1Co 11:24-26; Mat 26:26-27): so that the popish sacrifice of the mass (as they call it) is most abominably injurious to Christ’s one, only sacrifice, the alone propitiation for all the sins of His elect, (Hbr 7:23-24, 27; Hbr 10:11-12, 14, 18).

I agree with everything except Calvinist stuff. Limited atonement makes no sense, and just flies in the face of things like, "While we were yet sinners, Christ died for us." I was saved on the cross, now it's just a matter of faith overcoming the world.

42:15 bookmark

Thank you Dr James White. Hebrews 10:14 it's a wonderful passage - For by ONE offering He has perfected forever them that are sanctified.

🙏 and 🙏 and Amen,,,,,

Protestant here, discerning Catholicism. Want to do my homework. Mike Winger's objections did nothing for me. Surface level and straw manning. James White was a bit better, but still hasn't done much - his points are confused, contradictory and surface level. One step closer to Rome.

45:18 min. into video..."general atonement"! The KJV translators were mostly "calvinists" and understood Greek and Hebrew very well. They chose to use the word 'atonement' in Rom.5:11 to show that 'reconciliation' is 'received'. Christ is the Atonement made by God, and received by sinners (Jn.1:12, Rom.5:17,11) in faith, 'faith in His blood' (Rom.3:25; as a 'propitiation'). The word "general" means all admitting of exceptions, while "universal" means all without exception. Christ is God's 'salvation' offered to men (Lu.2:30), and which must be 'received' from Heaven (Jn.3:27). John Calvin and many others believe in both a "general" atonement AND a 'particular' redemption, as men receive Him which is made by God 'redemption' (1Cor.1:30), as well as 'Salvation' (Lu.2:30). Obviously a gift must be appropriated and received to truly become one's own. Apostle Paul makes it plain that The Day of Atonement included all Israel, even though they were 'not all Israel, which were of Israel', as some were 'the children of the flesh' and 'not children of God' (Rom.9:6,8). And in Acts 17:24-31 God 'hath made of one blood all nations of men' and 'determined ...That they should seek the Lord' and 'now commandeth all men every where to repent' and to appropriate such glorious grace, and 'offers faith/assurance unto all men'!!! I admit that it is "general" (meaning all admitting of exceptions, for there is no redemption for devils, such as Judas, which betray Christ and the gospel), and the confusion arises when equating "general" with the word "universal", and not making right distinctions between the two words, as too many men do!

The Church has battled with the Eucharist and has confirmed Christs words. To eat flesh and drink blood was anathema to the Jewish faith. Christ explicitly said just that…my body to eat my blood to drink! Peter’s act of faith even though he couldn’t know how was perfect. When you deny the true presence you turn away from what Jesus said..you deny Christs teaching! No matter whic way you look at it there is no doubt what Christ meant, and then on the eve of Passover he showed He showed His apostles what He meant and How we were to take part. Just read John6

WTH WE ARE IN THE 21ST CENTURY AND PEOPLE STILL ARENT CATHOLIC??!?

John 6:53 “Then Jesus said unto them, *Verily, verily,* I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.”

The question Dr White poses most Catholics is if they are sure they are at peace with God? My question to him is is he 100% certain in his reformed view that he is one of the elected for good and not one for damnation? Is he at peace with that?

You’ll find others like James White described in John 6:66. They left Jesus too because of His teaching on the Eucharist.

I think I'm going to stick with the Catholic Church who has 2024 years of experience interpreting the Scriptures instead of the Church of James White .

The Roman Catholic Eucharist or Mass is NOT the same one Jesus instituted in Matthew 26 over 2,000 years ago.

45:25 as an arminian I can explain the atonement exactly 48:01 the monergist needs to explain the confessing christian still commiting sodomy how they could end up in hell-1cor6:9-11- since Christ already died for all their sin!?!?

Who are the descendants of Esau today? There is a Jewish tradition stemming from the Talmud, that the descendants of Esau would eventually become the Romans, and to a larger extent, all Europeans. Obadiah 1:18 And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the LORD hath spoken it. So christ didn't die for the all who call on his name!

I was about to share this with a Catholic friend which I've been Attempting to show him the error of Catholicism But you're tagged on at the end about about Calvinism. Because of that false doctrine I cannot share it to him.. What a crying shame. Up until then it would have been perfect.

he doesn’t understand

Mr White needs to explain why so many ancient Christian communities, Oriental, Eastern Orthodox, and Catholic, believe in the real presence and similar doctrines that he rejects. He has no pedigree, no matter how much he pontificates.

James, when you speak of the Catholic Church, you see them through very shallow eyes. You need to change your attitude. Go deeper into the Catholic Faith and try to discover why they believe the way they do. They aer fellow Christians. Treat them with patience, kindness and love. Give them a break.

Dr. White does an incredible backhand to his personal hidden infallibility where he has the audacity as a follower of John Calvin to think he ultimately has the right teaching and authority to define the gospel. Unfortunately he is in error as was John Calvin

IN EGYPT THE PEOPLE WORSHIPPED THE SUN AND THEY CALLED IT... THE GREAT GOD OSIRIS. ON THE ALTARS OF EGYPT WERE ROUND SUN-SHAPED WAFERS MADE OF UNLEAVENED BREAD. EGYPTIAN PRIEST WOULD PRAY OVER THE LITTLE WAFERS TO MAKE THEM HOLY. THEN THEY TOLD THE PEOPLE THAT A MIRACLE HAD HAPPENED. THEY CLAIMED THAT THE WAFERS HAD TURNED INTO THE FLESH OF THE SUN GOD, OSIRIS. THE PRIESTS OF EGYPT CALLED THIS MIRACLE "TRANSUBSTANTIATION" AND THEN THE PEOPLE ATE THEIR GOD. THE PEOPLE HAD TO SAY IT WAS OSIRIS, BECAUSE EVERYONE ELSE DID. OUT OF FEAR, THE PEOPLE BOWED TO THIS STRANGE NEW IDOL AND SERVED IT. THEY WERE AFRAID OF THE EGYPTIAN PRIEST'S HELPERS AND THEIR MAGIC BECAUSE THE SUN-SHAPED WAFERS MEANT LIFE OR DEATH TO THEM. THE PEOPLE WERE MADE TO BOW DOWN AND WORSHIP THE SUN-SHAPED WAFERS, THE BABY JESUS, THE DEAD JESUS ON A CROSS, THE EGYPTIAN PRIEST AND HIS HELPERS. BUT THE BIBLE SAYS: THOU SHALT NOT MAKE UNTO THEE ANY GRAVEN IMAGE, OR ANY LIKENESS OF ANYTHING THAT IS IN HEAVEN ABOVE, OR THAT IS IN THE EARTH BENEATH, OR THAT IS IN THE WATER UNDER THE EARTH. THOU SHALT NOT BOW DOWN THYSELF TO THEM, NOR SERVE THEM: FOR I THE LORD THY GOD AM A JEALOUS GOD, VISITING THE INIQUITY OF THE FATHERS UPON THE CHILDREN UNTO THE THIRD AND FOURTH GENERATION OF THEM THAT HATE ME AND SHOWING MERCY UNTO THOUSANDS OF THEM THAT LOVE ME AND THAT KEEP MY COMMANDMENTS. (EXODUS 20:3-6). THE LORD JESUS HATES THE WAFER GOD BECAUSE IT IS AN IDOL AND BEHIND EVERY IDOL IS A DEMON. THE BIBLE SAYS: "COME OUT OF HER, MY PEOPLE, THAT YE BE NOT PARTAKERS OF HER SINS, AND THAT YE RECEIVE NOT OF HER PLAGUES (REVELATION 18:4).

Perhaps the crucifixion did not sacrifice an innocent person to satisfy the wrath of God because that would have been unjust.

Like that ,many believe "Church history began with Billy Graham"

Si el Cristo muere en un negocio, entonces el negocio es el pecado de cualquier hecho. El Cristo resucitado, resucita del negocio que le ha matado. La "salvación" consiste en liberarnos del negocio. La palabra que nos "salva" del negocio es palabra sagrada y esa palabra es "eucarística" o el cristianismo no dirá nada, será un cristianismo muerto por el negocio. If the Christ dies in a business, then the business is the sin of any deed. The risen Christ rises from the business that has killed him. "Salvation" consists in getting rid of the business. The word that "saves" us from business is a sacred word and that word is "Eucharistic" or Christianity will say nothing, it will be a Christianity killed by business.

Why did these Calvinists sound like Islamists who attacked Christian doctrines?

“Does this offend you?" John 6:61. Unfortunately, this guys misunderstands many areas regardong Cathic beliefs. They don't reoffer the sacrifice. It is a recognition of Hebrews. Read the following: John 3:16, 6:63, 1st Cor 11:29, Eph 2:8.

I thought White did pretty bad in this debate

I have provided the holy scripture to provide insight as to Catholic dogma on the Eucharist - the REAL presence. I find it problematic Dr White isnt able to do same for his audiences. The Son of Man, explanation given by White is well known for thousands of years, it is a term the Jewish faithful would correlate to the prophets. However, Dr White has a recurring habit in his apologetics to jump around a lot instead of making his point. Why doesn't not make his path straight, instead digressing about new words, anecdotes, describing the Son of Man all unnecessary to refute or debunk the Eucharist. If he has the proof of this let him cut to the chase using scripture in the all the Holy Bible to do so. For 1500 years before the protestant church began it's movement of faith alone, all early Christians ( Catholics and Orthodox) believed then and do now, the REAL PRESECNCE OF CHRIST JESUS in the Eucharist. Let that sink in. There is nothing NEW that Dr White can demonstrate, but he tries...However, if Jesus wanted to double down on belief alone for his Eucharist remembrance, he would have said it, correct? Jesus goes on to say " I live because of the Father, so he who eats me will live because of me." again He didn't say " same as believing in His divinity. When the multitude are leaving Jesus and his apostles tell Him that the saying is hard to accept, does Jesus reassure them that it is a metaphor or parable and that he meant belief in Him being the Savior? NOPE. As you will SEE believe St Paul ALSO believes and CAUTIONS those believing Christians NOT to take the Eucharist UNWORTHILY. Finally, below you see that purposely Jesus did not REVEAL His identity to the 2 men on the road Emmaus until He Blessed and broke the bread...then VANISHED. Some protestants like to jest that Jesus isn't inside a wafer of Bread. Jesus is God and He has already proven He is capable of all miracles and He also has proved He is diligent to fulfill all prophecies and truths of His Word. Truly. as his vocation, I hope Dr White do a little more due diligence in his anti-Catholic rhetoric. Also, seriously researching the miracles of Eucharist throughout the ages, with more modern miracles' findings making scientists scratch their heads. You won't hear on mainstream news, just like you won't hear the miracles of the Shroud of Turin. RESEARCH and READ and learn for yourselves. JOHN 6:45: It is written in the prophets, ‘And they shall all be taught by God.’ Every one who has heard and learned from the Father comes to me. 46 Not that any one has seen the Father except him who is from God; he has seen the Father. 47 Truly, truly, I say to you, he who believes has eternal life. 48 I am the bread of life. 49 Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. 50 This is the bread which comes down from heaven, that a man may eat of it and not die. 51 I am the living bread[c] which came down from heaven; if any one eats of this bread, he will live for ever; and the bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh.” 52 The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”[d] 53 So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; 54 he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. 55 For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. 56 He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. 57 As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats me will live because of me. 58 This is the bread which came down from heaven, not such as the fathers ate and died; he who eats this bread will live for ever.” Luke 22:15: And he said to them, “I have earnestly desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer. 16 For I tell you I will not eat it[a] until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God.” 17 And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he said, “Take this, and divide it among yourselves. 18 For I tell you that from now on I will not drink of the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God comes.” 19 And he took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” 20 And likewise the cup after they had eaten, saying, “This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood.[b] ST PAUL 1 Corinthians 23: For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, 24 and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, “This is my body which is for[c] you. Do this in remembrance of me.” 25 In the same way also the cup, after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” 26 For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes. Partaking of the Supper Unworthily 27 Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. 28 Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. 29 For any one who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself. Luke 24:28 So they drew near to the village to which they were going. He acted as if he were going farther, 29 but they urged him strongly, saying, “Stay with us, for it is toward evening and the day is now far spent.” So he went in to stay with them. 30 When he was at table with them, he took the bread and blessed and broke it and gave it to them. 31 And their eyes were opened, and they recognized him. And he vanished from their sight. CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA “’Eat my flesh,’ [Jesus] says, ‘and drink my blood.’ The Lord supplies us with these intimate nutrients, he delivers over his flesh and pours out his blood, and nothing is lacking for the growth of his children” (The Instructor of Children ST. IGNATIUS of Antioch on the Eucharist in his Letter to the Smyrnaeans: “Take note of those who hold heterodox opinions on the grace of Jesus Christ which has come to us, and see how contrary their opinions are to the mind of God. . . . They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, flesh which suffered for our sins and which that Father, in his goodness, raised up again. They who deny the gift of God are perishing in their disputes.” The earliest Christians were much more informed without their faith being watered down by 500 years of protestant interpretations. The belief in Jesus' REAL presence for His future believers is essential and let's not forget Jesus said He is with us always until the close of the age.

Jesus. 335 Mary. 1 Mary was so important to the apostles when they were writing their letters to the New Testament churches that she was only mentioned once after Jesus had ascended to heaven. (Acts 1:14) Jesus on the other hand was named 335 times. Mary was clearly unimportant to the early apostles. She has no role in salvation. She was an honorable young woman from Nazareth. She obeyed God.

Is he trying to make me a Catholic ? It’s working

I found his refutation weak and lacking. "When I got home and listened to the tape again I looked it up and it all fell apart". How? with what? he made more of a case for Rome than against it. The only people that think James White made a strong argument here are the ones that would side with James White if he said the green grass is violet. I like James White and I like seeing his debates but he made a weak case here.

This guy has a lack of understanding that tatoos are sin.

You could hardly exalt the eucharist higher. Sum, summit, sumthing. You protest too much.

What is a drink? Matthew 26:27 ESV - And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, saying, “Drink of it, all of you, What part of "drink" and what part of "all of you" didn't you understand in the commandment from my Lord?

Catholics are great! I Love my Catholic Faith. Bless Jesus in the Holy Sacrament of the Alter!!!

Christ himself says, ‘This is my body.’ I do not want to hear what reason says. Luther at Marburg

James white always misrepresents the Catholic Faith How could he say this a modern Catholic Theology the Eucharist When the early Church always had an Altar 🤔 What do they do on an altar?❓But offer a sacrifice

Amazing guy! But I have to be honest Mr. White. The First part of your speech as you are laying out the Eucharist had me wanting to run back into a Catholic Church and prostrate myself before the Altar 😂

Much of the Catechism is good, not this part. Who wrote this? Your'e fired.

No one who goes to daily Mass dies in mortal sin. His arguments with the teaching of the Catholic Church seem personal, much like his interpretation of scripture, but I digress. Yes, the Pope is Liberal, and to those listening to this video hear him say “Modern Catholic Church” many times. The Faith cannot change or be modernized. Look to the Traditionalists.

All scripture are the words of Jesus.

Catholics do not need to be evangelized. The only Catholics that might need your efforts are those who do not follow their faith, and bless you for befriending them and leading them to Christ. A true Catholic that knows the faith will be glad to be your friend and you might learn some truth if you try to evangelize a real Catholic.

If Jesus' death were sufficient to save us without the need for anything else, there would be no need for us to have faith in order to be saved.

Why would you make a cross podium to stand over? Blasphemy.

Why would G3 EVER allow this man to speak? Shocking.

He used this time to do just what he does on KZfaq with all debates, try to re-debate his opponent using this bully pulpit. I think the audience deserved better than James White tacking on 50 minutes to his debate with Trent Horn. Not fair, but this is how James White rolls.

Coffee is idolatry.