How eVTOLs Could Disrupt The $49B Helicopter Industry
Рет қаралды 461,498
Жыл бұрынWith an estimated 200 companies working on them, electric vertical take-off and landing vehicles are taking the aviation industry by storm. And while vertical lift aircraft have existed for more than a century in the form of helicopters, eVTOLs could disrupt the $49 billion industry in certain segments due to their cheaper maintenance and operating costs. CNBC spoke with one startup, Archer Aviation, which counts United Airlines as one of its investors, about why we could see these new aircraft change how people travel.
Chapters:
1:33 Competing with helicopters
5:46 Archer Aviation
10:11 Challenges
Produced by: Andrew Evers
Narration and Editorial Support: Katie Tarasov
Supervising Producer: Jeniece Pettitt
Additional Camera: Sydney Boyo
Graphics by: Jason Reginato
» Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBC
» Subscribe to CNBC TV: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBCtelevision
About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.
Connect with CNBC News Online
Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: cnb.cx/LinkedInCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Twitter: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/InstagramCNBC
Subscribe to CNBC PRO: cnb.cx/2NLi9AN
#CNBC #flyingcars #business #aviation
How eVTOLs Could Disrupt The $49B Helicopter Industry
@annunakian8054 Жыл бұрын
If they say they'll launch in 2025 that means they'll launch in 2030. So many EV companies are way behind on production & burning thru cash. For something like this, they need a higher degree of expertise, legislation, infrastructure, funding & rare metals.
@CmdrCorn Жыл бұрын
It all comes down to legislation and infrastructure. You can buy something similar today for $100k, but start flying it around town and you'll cause a panic.
@brandontierney9489 Жыл бұрын
Most Ev car companies went under without the help of big auto.
@notapplicable4567 Жыл бұрын
@@CmdrCorn where?
@joeking433 Жыл бұрын
Nah! You're from Saudi Arabia! ;)
@CmdrCorn Жыл бұрын
@Not Applicable There's the Jetson ONE, the Blackfly just to pull up a couple names real quick of production models.. However you can do just as well to build something yourself. Even para-motors which is just a lawnmower engine spinning a giant fan blade and a parachute get the job done... Look up 'electric single seat plane' or something... If I had more money and time I'd end up on the evening news for sure. It just blows me away there isnt more of it happening. I often think this is a big part of the "gr8 reset" and upsetting current paradigms before this singularity in ai, robotics, blockchain, 3d printing, battery tech, biotech, etc all spills over into the lower-middle-class markets all at once and central planners wont be able to keep up...
@DaNyBoY46 Жыл бұрын
“It’s completely silent if you are on the ground” *scrubs audio from all clips of the helicopters*
@trepan4944 Жыл бұрын
Glad I'm not the only one who picked up on that.
@joeking433 Жыл бұрын
Huh?
@JamarD421 Жыл бұрын
Seriously! I thought to myself "Oh? Word? Allow me to hear just how quiet it is CNBC" but sure enough they just talked over the clips with music. Ugh.
@johntomik4632 Жыл бұрын
Yea you can't hear it from a couple miles away lol
@chrisn7847 Жыл бұрын
@@JamarD421 Go watch the youtube videos from Joby Aviation and see how quiet that vehicle is. They are the leader in this space!
@Rakusan2 Жыл бұрын
Upon hearing the price and plans, I think building train tracks and stations would be cheaper and better for everyone
@ThriftyCHNR Жыл бұрын
These products are not for the masses. This is luxury for the elite.
@Rakusan2 Жыл бұрын
@@ThriftyCHNR In most cases, trains will get you to the destination just as fast, don't need to be booked ahead of time, and can transport the entire office without needing to be recharged in between. Also do note that many developed countries have shown that the rich will use public transport if it is worth their time.
@TheBooban Жыл бұрын
@@Rakusan2 not only about their time. It’s the filthy peasants they don’t want to mix with. And I agree! I don’t want to mix with them either! Trains do have first class though. It’s a huge difference.
@joeking433 Жыл бұрын
Lots of people pushing trains on here! Must work for train companies. I've never ridden a train and don't ride buses. Americans don't like mass transit. It's for poor people.
@Macgyver46 Жыл бұрын
@TheBooban you seriously think your better? You and everyone like you is the reason this world is so screwed up.
@eddienoragong402 Жыл бұрын
This is an ad for Archer. Joby is at least 6 months ahead, and has been developing eVTOL since 2009. Market cap is nearly $2B, resources on track to certify by 2024, bring services online (with help from Uber and Delta) by 2025.
@sumitshresth Жыл бұрын
it will only raise air congestion and move road traffic into air. For those regular trips from airport to downtown why not invest on bullet train so you can get from airport to downtown in way less than 1 hour that cars take.
@thunderb00m Жыл бұрын
Then you'd have to rub shoulders with the peasants, what's the point of that !? /s
@sumitshresth Жыл бұрын
@@thunderb00m well we can have different compartments with ticket difference. one with peasant and other full with wine giving strippers ready to give you time of life for a few thousand bucks per ticket
@joeking433 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, I can see air congestion being a problem. But we don't like trains, so there's that.
@sumitshresth Жыл бұрын
@@joeking433 its not about what you like or dislike its about what makes sense
@MrVTeta Жыл бұрын
Swarm AI can easily solve air congestion. The air is a 3D space
@user9b2 Жыл бұрын
In the mean time, do hybrids, power those electric motors with generators to get the range and power needed for specific usage.
@KickassCrusader Жыл бұрын
it really would bridge the gap between the real helicopters and problems with battery weight, until that can be solved if it can at a later date, they could even make them modular in nature to be updated so its not just chucking a whole hybrid vtol in the garbage at the end of it
@ADAPTATION7 Жыл бұрын
I thought about that but it might also complicate manufacturing and increase production costs.
@TheBooban Жыл бұрын
Thats not how the advantage works with hybrid. Its good for cars because you can stop and refuel. The added weight makes no sense in a evtol when you can’t just land and refuel.
@manp1039 Жыл бұрын
it would be intereting if Toyota came out with a hybrid eVTOL, a prius of the skies. I think they hybrid design will be the first successfully commercial eVTOl vehicles.
@user-pq4by2rq9y Жыл бұрын
@@ADAPTATION7 it would be a smaller issue at scale but your point is valid.
@pressurizer1 Жыл бұрын
If those eVTOLs were rigorously tested to be safe enough to transport the developers and engineers' families and loved ones, then customers would get in to them eVTOLs right quick
@Eskschannel Жыл бұрын
They would be vastly safer as you have simpler mechanism and more engines, the main problem is range.
@MelonEsuk Жыл бұрын
they have a glide ration and multiple motors so single point failure like gear issue like in helicopters will not occur
@DrJohnnyJ Жыл бұрын
I would get in one today. They are really safe.
@nutsackmania Жыл бұрын
@@Eskschannel Wrong, these are completely dependent on very fine control of large motors, something that has only recently become viable at this scale. A solid rocket booster is a simpler mechanism, too--but it's not safer. YIKES
@nikobelic4251 Жыл бұрын
They probably would but they aren’t certified
@marcuscove Жыл бұрын
They have a long way to go. Joby is in the lead, but they currently only have a 150 mile range. FAA certification of these new types will take many years. The time it will take to financially survive the FAA type cert process may eliminate many of these start-ups.
@joeking433 Жыл бұрын
Nah! They said the same about Tesla.
@devengudinas1649 Жыл бұрын
He said 50 miles range
@bxkxhxkg82 Жыл бұрын
@@joeking433 the aeronautical industry have heavy certifications and its difficult to a startup to try to do all the vehicle by themselves
@chrisn7847 Жыл бұрын
@@devengudinas1649 Marcus is speaking on Joby Aviation, which is the leader. That has a 150 mile range at a top speed of 200 mph.... Archer is has less range and lower top speed. That said, it doesn't matter. These company's business models are designed for shorter flights. Like 30 miles per trip.
@FPVREVIEWS Жыл бұрын
only a couple have to survive. and they can more easily get additional funding, the closer they get to certification.
@andrewozzy Жыл бұрын
As Evtols progress I think it would be interesting to have like an evtol parking garage for those trying to avoid ground congestion and want a more elegant way of commuting. Having a parking garage of sorts in a city center where 2-4 helicopters can land on a rover type platform that transports the helicopter to a lower deck would be something I have thought a lot about. The rover would clear the landed aircraft and a new rover would take its place for the next landing.
@hxjp Жыл бұрын
great report, thanks. so much to think about. do xflares, or other solar events, affect these types of engines?
@shmookins Жыл бұрын
Things are progressing so fast I can't even imagine the world in 2050.
@johnslaughter5475 9 ай бұрын
I would love to see them being operated out of Spokane International Airport as air taxis to the towns within about 50-60 miles driving distance. For instance, people in the Coeur d'Alene, ID area could go to Pappy Boyington field on the north side of CDA and take an air taxi to GEG, which is a straight line distance of only 35 miles. Right now, everyone is facing 1+ hour drives to GEG, plus the gas and wear & tear, and then 2-3 hours to get aboard their long haul flight. If these could be developed to go 400 miles, the people in the greater Spokane area could fly to Seattle, Portland, Boise, much easier.
@karlossargeant3872 Жыл бұрын
I can't wait to fly on The eVTOL Vechecles coming soon Awesome Video!!!!
@JohnnyC10071959 Жыл бұрын
Outstanding video and such great technology.
@garyvermaak9470 Жыл бұрын
The main helicopter market segments are business aviation, EMS and law enforcement, where payload, range and speed are key, so a hundred helicopter airshuttles in each of the 35 or so global metropolises is not going to disrupt the light helicopter market. Remembered also that when Continental Airlines, merged into United, offered $49, and even free, Manhattan Newark flights from 2006 to 2009 to business class pax. Most prefered to take a longer limo ride and use the travel time productively.
@gabrielbilate7499 Жыл бұрын
forgot to mention oil and gas offshore ops, lots of miles and payload
@garyvermaak9470 Жыл бұрын
@@gabrielbilate7499 that's why I found Ehang marketing of the 220kg, 22 mile range 216 for the offshore oil and gas industry to be a joke.
@aerialdarkguy Жыл бұрын
It will definitely lower the barrier of entry into aviation and attract more interest in the field by lowering costs and could help especially with emergency services. I'm skeptical on the mass transit claims though beyond certain preexisting flight routes/taxi services they could muscle into. Ultimately infra and battery improvements will be the key factors.
@alankohn6709 Жыл бұрын
My problem is that a lot of these designs have pretty small lift capacity so a bit of luggage and a couple of larger people and they are overloaded and like all EV's charge time a couple of trips and you're down for several hours recharging. Also too many of these companies are leverage future success on higher capacity batteries and a lot of the new break throughs are in manufacture, material and disposal.
@David-bg9od 6 ай бұрын
Yeah extremely unrealistic for the one guy to say "It will make the helicopter obsolete".
@andrewleno591 Жыл бұрын
WOW! that is absolutely unbelievable, so much fresh and new. How they even come to this, eVTOL!??? Such a inovative naming! I hope they made a patent for this. If try to think more about this... Maybe they should not compare it with outdated helicopter! But with ICEVOLTs! ICE stands for internal combustion engine. Congrats to their marketing team, hope they engineering team as good as their marketing team.
@benwillvv Жыл бұрын
Very well reported. Thank you! Eager to hear about more of the companies, like Beta, that are launching as well.
@FPVREVIEWS Жыл бұрын
yes, and also lillilm. and others!!!
@temprd Жыл бұрын
The use case constantly being touted for this aircraft is lower Manhattan to EWR. Just take the PATH. And if you really hate transferring in Newark, demand your representatives extend the PATH to EWR like they said they’d do 50 years ago.
@ericcarabetta1161 Жыл бұрын
Hmm, a brand new private aircraft, or a dirty, nasty, underground bus? Such a tough choice.
@ain92ru Жыл бұрын
@@ericcarabetta1161 American buses could be as decent as Western European ones, but American politicians (who unlike the European ones never stepped in public transportation) has closed the market for very comfortable high-end European buses which Swedish, Swiss or German millionaires routinely use in their large cities
@TheLPRnetwork Жыл бұрын
The amount of CGI clips is suspicious, but happy there are plenty of real clips. The design however, is the most suspicious of all
@joeking433 Жыл бұрын
GD, there are a LOT of skeptics in this comment section! Do you all work for helicopter companies???
@MrVTeta Жыл бұрын
@@joeking433 People just got used to seeing EV companies come up with goals that were never reached or tooks years longer than predicted.
@joeking433 Жыл бұрын
@@MrVTeta Do they know of a company called Tesla? ;)
@MrVTeta Жыл бұрын
@@joeking433 They do. Which pretty much is always behind on promised vehicle launch dates, features launch date such as full self driving, and production output.
@joeking433 Жыл бұрын
@@MrVTeta Have you heard of the new Ford Lightning? Or the Ford Mustang Mach E? Or the BMW i4? Those are all hot selling EV's! The Chevy Bolt is only $26k and that is before tax credit! Nice car for so cheap! No one talks about ICE cars any more. That's because you won't be able to buy one in California and other states after 2035. They're pretty much dead.
@pauldannelachica2388 Жыл бұрын
Nice reporting CNBC. The future of urban mobility
@haihengh Жыл бұрын
a typical helicopter has range of 300-400 miles, the electric one is not going to have this kind of range. for the short range it makes sense, but for longer range like 200+ miles, not going to make much sense, the battery is just not going to have that energy density.
@TheCynicalOptimist88 Жыл бұрын
Yes it could never replace say a coastguard helicopter because they never know how long they're going to be in the air for and then may need to refuel and leave right away to save more people for eg ... This piece would be for very niche specific purposes like businessmen... Other than that it's just a hype thing with current battery technology and charging rates . Weight is everything when you're an aircraft. Then there's lifting things that's just ridiculously out of reach...
@JamarD421 Жыл бұрын
The weight alone is already making me question if this'll get far.
@helifanodobezanozi7689 Жыл бұрын
These are basically intended to be used like city cabs, not cross country trains or busses. The range for the average trip is targeted at 30-40 miles.
@JoeZaccaris 11 ай бұрын
Why do eVTOLs have to be an "all or nothing" endeavor? Just because they can't fly 1000 miles on one charge doesn't mean they won't have many types of uses in both urban and rural areas. You need to expand your mind and have an innovative viewpoint on these things. It's the same dumb argument I hear about delivery drones --- "a drone can't carry a refrigerator to a customer's house 20 miles away so they will never be viable". Just really dumb arguments.
@Tenchinu Жыл бұрын
Me: can we stop to get some flying cars? Mom: We have Flying cars at home
@1locust1 Жыл бұрын
It will be interesting to see the first appearance of an eVtol aircraft in a movie or television production.
@patpatpat999 9 ай бұрын
And how would you know? It's all CGI anyway.
@bavariancarenthusiast2722 6 ай бұрын
@@patpatpat999 CGI is been done in many movies, if they are real - you will know!
@Tiger1x1 Жыл бұрын
These evtols can't provide mass transit... Metro or manglev would be a better option for this purpose
@emmakai2243 Жыл бұрын
Did you even watch the video? It's obviously not designed for mass transit. It's a premium sky taxi ....very different from metro/trains.
@thunderb00m Жыл бұрын
@emma kai yes exactly. But the need for this is not there if you have good transit. So for all our sakes I hope this evtol fails
@phantomiforgot3750 Жыл бұрын
@@thunderb00m I hope it succeeds, because if they can mass produce it and make it more efficient it would change aviation forever, It would make interest in the efficient VTOL design come to more planes.
@jermainec2462 Жыл бұрын
This will be for the rich and impatient... Not the poor and humble....
@rmcc0621 Жыл бұрын
Welcome to the US where we are not interested in mass transit.
@ShotAmazing Күн бұрын
If I think about how this would actually work in practice…. A company like archer would probably have a small area in these downtowns to land / take off if they want to be in a good location for workers. They use the downtown helipad in Manhattan as an example. Say they get three of the ten spots there. And say it takes 5 minutes to land and unboard people. So during peak “go to work” hours, say from 730am-830am, that’s 4 people x 3 evtols x 12 ( 60 min / 5 min) = 144 people per hour. At $100 a person that’s $14,400 revenue. And that’s probably with ~36 evtols operating at $1000 per hour. For a half hour trip including loading and unloading people, that’s $18,000. So gross loss is $4,000 per hour. And that’s with no downtime at peak demand. I don’t see how this is either efficient or profitable. Trains seem 1000x better. What am I missing???
@jim5148 Жыл бұрын
Other than the power plants and rotor configurations used, how will this be any different than helicopter service that's been available for 50 years?
@lepidoptera9337 Жыл бұрын
It won't. It serves exactly the same purpose.
@markjmaxwell9819 8 ай бұрын
It's a great idea And the range anxiety of electric vehicles has faded thankfully with the widespread adoption of electric cars. Once solid state batteries become mainstream the appeal of these types of vehicles will only accelerate. Some newer more efficient designs have yet to be tested but I see a big future ahead for eVTOL aircraft. 😎👍
@JH-jo9wt 6 ай бұрын
100Kwh is nearly 600kgs or 1330 lbs in batteries or 55lbs in jet fuel id say we're still a little way off yet
@mamdouh-Tawadros Жыл бұрын
I wonder where would be the propeller motors, sourced from ?
@devengudinas1649 Жыл бұрын
China
@saulgoodman2018 Жыл бұрын
$4.5 million for a helicopter? It's like half of that.
@eric4946 Жыл бұрын
For a passenger/transit ready helicopter ? I don’t think so… You can find stuff like a jet ranger for $1.7 used but you’re not getting a proper 6 person for 1-2m I would think,
@saulgoodman2018 Жыл бұрын
@@eric4946 these evtol's don't carry 6 passengers either.
@eric4946 Жыл бұрын
@@saulgoodman2018 they don’t carry any passengers as it stands, if they can’t carry ~6 people they’re pretty much useless from a carry capacity point of view .
@Oooonumbers Жыл бұрын
Yes and no. Some are less some are more. A Robinson R22 is probably around $300k last time I ever looked while something like a Sikorsky S-92 would be 20-30 million. Military helicopters like a CH-53 will be even more. $4.5 million is in the correct range for a light turbine helicopter like an H125.
@saulgoodman2018 Жыл бұрын
@@Oooonumbers I'm not talking about Military or luxury helicopters.
@CLAPforAnthropology Жыл бұрын
Their plan to keep it profitable is to up the amount of trips. But if it can only do two 20 mile trips before needing a charge that would probably take 1-2 hours, I dont understand how that can work. And that range is probably on a perfect day. I just have so many questions. What about on days where there is a 20 knot headwind and it can only make one trip. How would it de-ice/how would it handle icing conditions , it can’t use heat from engines so it would need power from the battery. When the temperature dropped from 60 to 40 degree my Tesla lost 20 percent of its charge. These batteries are no different. Electric motor are reliable, but there is always a chance of failure, Not to mention a bird strike. What happens when one fails at max gross weight. Can the others prevent it from falling to the ground, because it can’t auto rotate. Seems to me like the thing won’t be able to fly in anything but calm, warm days and if your planning on staying profitable by shear volume of trips I don’t see it working.
@jeffrhodes283 Жыл бұрын
Love it.....good luck finding the pilots needed.
@JoeZaccaris 11 ай бұрын
These things will rapidly become autonomous --- the only pilot needed will be a CPU and GPS receiver
@nikobelic4251 11 ай бұрын
@@JoeZaccaris eventually the newer generations will be, but they did expect evtols to need about 60 000 pilots by 2030 and by then we may start seeing the first pilotless evtols. EASA expects autonomous CAT (for evtols) by 2035 Volocopter is hoping for 2032 but given that the aviation industry moves slowly it will probably be closer to 2040 or so. Also, when they are autonomous there will still be a need for pilots on the ground to manage multiple vehicles. Why would any pilot do that when there will be other planes to fly from on board and not from the ground. The military has a drone pilot shortage in part for this reason… Unless EVTOL ground pilot pay goes up… and the “flight hours” transfer to being able to move on to the airlines (but I doubt it)
@tsensuke5259 Жыл бұрын
This wasn't a news piece, it was an infomercial.
@ArnaudJoakim Жыл бұрын
eVTOLs are very cool! Looking forward to seeing those flying around!
@Re_RAM Жыл бұрын
If this sector grows as they predict, how do they plan to avoid congestion in the skies? It's not clear what problem they're solving for with all this investment, would've been great to see a mass transit eVTOL solution.
@nikobelic4251 11 ай бұрын
UATM. Unmanned Air Traffic management
@alexlabs4858 Жыл бұрын
I think it will be quite a while before we replace heavy lift helicopters with EVTOLS because of the battery storage issues but it will happen eventually. You just can’t use an EVTOL to lift & set a huge transmission tower on a mountain with our current tech yet but I’m excited to see what happens in the sky crane industry with EVTOLS.
@Chris_at_Home Жыл бұрын
I worked a job for many years where I was transported in a helicopter to mountain top communications sites in the Arctic and with current technology an EV helicopter would never work.
@atomicskull6405 Жыл бұрын
Maybe a traditional single rotor helicopter with a powerful enough electric drive but no these contraptions will never replace single rotor helicopters in heavy lift because they have comparatively high disk loading which means they have a fundamentally less efficient lift system. A large slow turning rotor is more efficient than several smaller faster turning ones i.e. compared to a helicopter they have to expend more energy to generate the same amount of lift.
@user-pq4by2rq9y Жыл бұрын
Evtols are out of the question of anything but light vehicles. Hybrids however could become a thing.
@clintmusgrove6736 Жыл бұрын
EVTOL's will not do heavy lift operations and they're not saying they will go for that use. SAF will lower the emissions of helicopters but the cost of flying choppers will not go down enough to match the EVTOL's estimated 80% reduction in maintenance/operation costs, compared to helicopters. EVTOL's will grow a transportation segment that most of us haven't even considered because it hasn't existed, just like we couldn't imagine making a video phone call from a small computer in our hands, just 15 yrs ago.
@JoeZaccaris 11 ай бұрын
You need to stop jamming a square peg into a round hole. eVTOLs were never meant to be heavy-lift vehicles. But they will serve a very important role for fast air transport of humans and light cargo over congested urban areas. People are also forgetting that these things will eventually become autonomous which greatly expands their use cases in all kinds of situations. You will NEVER see helicopters becoming autonomous.
@aardque Жыл бұрын
I love how they say "disrupt," as if the idea of a growth economy is just a scam. It's like, "well, actually there aren't enough helicopters to sate the growing demain, for which they are largely too complicated and expensive to fill, but let's not step on any toes and force consumers to stick to that platform," said no one EVER.
@dingbop963 Жыл бұрын
@ 11:52 what's an electric engine?
@luisenriquegimenezm.1210 7 ай бұрын
Great info, thanks.
@definingslawek4731 Жыл бұрын
2:22 Is the RPM lower? That's so strange to me considering in all the FPV drones I build, the smaller you go the higher rpm you have, and the larger the lower rpm. My guess would be that 1 single giant rotor would have a much lower rpm than those 12 really small rotors.
@zapfanzapfan Жыл бұрын
Probably tip speed, not RPM.
@definingslawek4731 Жыл бұрын
@@zapfanzapfan I thought tip speed on all rotor aircraft is roughly the same, which is exactly why the rpm is different across different aircraft. I watched a video with an aerospace engineer explaining why we choose different speed motors for the drones we build, and the answer was that you gain 'free' performance by increasing the rpm of the motor until the tips start going too close to the speed of sound, at which point you lose efficiency. He said that this is why (allegedly) a helicopter and a little drone have very similar top tip speed, as the tip speed on both approach the speed of sound.
@zapfanzapfan Жыл бұрын
@@definingslawek4731 Reducing the tip speed seems to me the only way to reduce noise. I don't know how the overall performance calculation changes when going from piston or turbine to electric.
@MOBMJ Жыл бұрын
This would be amazing. For me, for example, I live in Southern California. For me the nearest airport is less than 20 minutes away from me. But the problem is it is not an international airport, so if I want to go to another country. Which is what most of my traveling is, outside of the US I would have to go to an international airport, which is LAX. With traffic it’s about 2 hours away. If I could take a short helicopter ride from Disneyland international airport to LAX, and then to my international destination, that’s a win-win for me. Because I don’t like stops, but I also don’t want to drive two hours from where I am to LAX.
@auro1986 Жыл бұрын
how? by changing their name from helicopters to evtol
@kapikalopocalypse9016 Жыл бұрын
Helicopters cant fly like a plane
@geeeee8268 Жыл бұрын
Unless they take me to exactly where I need to go in a city, it will be pretty much pointless. Except maybe in instances where there is a huge traffic. And even then depends where the traffic really is. It's sort of like riding subway from outer borrow and having to transfer. You might get on express train and make 2/3 of your way in 1/5 of the time. But then get stuck on a platform and riding local 1/3 of the way for the rest 4/5.
@helifanodobezanozi7689 7 ай бұрын
Uber and another EVTOL company, Joby, are teaming up for exactly that reason. You book a combined car/EVTOL trip from point A to point B with a single app. Don't be surprised if Archer either teams up with Lift, or starts their own car based ride share division. The Archer CEO has also hinted that landing in the streets may be a possibility on a future model.
@Alex-us2vw Жыл бұрын
When I see these first thing I wonder is if they can autorotate after a failure. Do these small rotors store enough energy to arrest the descent and land, do they even have a collective control to do this maneuver?
@user-pq4by2rq9y Жыл бұрын
These things have six rotors... why would you ever autorotate that thing?
@JoeZaccaris 11 ай бұрын
Auto-rotate doesn't work with props this small. The main advantage of eVTOLs over helicopters is their redundancy, whereas helis have multiple points of catastrophic failure.
@rikardooxd Жыл бұрын
Amazing! ❤
@SumeetSingh001 Жыл бұрын
Why don’t invest in metro or subway to connect Newark to Manhattan? Or Chicago? A public transport would always be cleaner and environment friendly than any personal EV
@joeking433 Жыл бұрын
Because we don't need no stinking trains that no one rides and loses taxpayer money. You're always trying to steal from the taxpayers! Shame on you!
@nikovenag4110 Жыл бұрын
its a cool idea.. I also thought about starting to develop something like an amateur project, but then the question is: Where the user can park these copters? On the street? Not possible as they are wide, even on wide boulevards you cannot do it. Over buildings? Then the city needs many helicorder pads. As a user I won't buy it unless I can park it almost anywhere I want. And with current infrastructure, this is not possible.
@joeking433 Жыл бұрын
Just park it in the backyard.
@JoeZaccaris 11 ай бұрын
Most cities can already accomodate these eVTOLs through existing helipads and parking lots and garages. Seeing them expand into small towns and rural areas will be a lot easier because of the abundance of wide open spaces.
@scott83gmail Жыл бұрын
After it carries its passenger 60 Mi where does it land?
@seanmcnulty79 Жыл бұрын
Not saying these are bad and even with better light rail and subway I could see a place for these. I could also see these caring cargo as well. In mountains areas these could be useful. I don't want to be a pessimist but how would these perform in bad weather?
@joeking433 Жыл бұрын
Light rail and subways have never succeeded and for all intents and purposes are dead in the water.
@hafizuddinmohdlowhim8426 Жыл бұрын
the person who designed a helicopter already thought about multi-copter and there is a reason why helicopter is always the solution.
@manp1039 Жыл бұрын
technology has evolved significantly since the first helicoptors took to the air.
@tsbrownie Жыл бұрын
Breakthrough Aircraft Reality is inversely proportional to the number of CGI videos made about it.
@rolflandale2565 Жыл бұрын
Helicopters are/can also E-vtol. The terminology is *electric verticle* take off or land. The difference of 'eVTOL" are *electric multi supoort purpulstion engines* evolution. Perhaps call it 'EMSPEVTOL' 👀( or something fancy😏).
@davidx.1504 Жыл бұрын
Nice piece about eVTOL vehicles taking off in the aviation industry, but why is archer aviation the focus when JOBY is the eVTOL leader?
@jamescrud Жыл бұрын
How the hell can they convince the FAA to certify this thing in 1 year?
@devengudinas1649 Жыл бұрын
Never it takes a minimum of 7 years
@nikobelic4251 11 ай бұрын
They won’t. 1 year certification is a pipe dream
@GA-yv3zw Жыл бұрын
NYC has planes colliding on the ground I can only imagine what's going to happen when you have a bunch of planes in the sky above new York
@agps4418 Жыл бұрын
lets not forget who we are. as humans, we can get things done if we set our mind to it. want eVTOL to work? it will. want eVTOL to die? it also will. it really depends on our mindset. what's really happening for sure is, those people behind the 49 Billion industry wont just sit still and let money get away from them. Not just the producers, the users, but also the lawmakers and regulators.
@jackbrennan592 Жыл бұрын
This guy is stretching the idea of this thing to the absolute limit. Hitting half his promises I think are physically impossible.
@JoeZaccaris 11 ай бұрын
Until he proves you wrong and they are buzzing all over the skies of every major urban area by 2030
@Vegetasinghyadav Жыл бұрын
Yes the answer is yes. Finally the future we all hoped for. Evtols will fill up the sky like all those future movies.
@simoneglobemaster Жыл бұрын
As a professional worker in the aviation industry, I am extremely skeptical about these eVTOLs, there are certain safety features of the helicopter that are impossible to replicate on those type of vehicles due to the nature of their design. And I love how the producers keep promessing quick certifications to stimulate investors while the reality is far from what stated...
@jlangevin65 Жыл бұрын
These aircraft have safety advantages that are impossible to replicate with helicopters. Don't try to tout helicopters as exemplars of safety, because that's ridiculous.
@simoneglobemaster Жыл бұрын
@@jlangevin65 negative that wasn't the purpose, but good luck pulling out an emergency maneuver in case of a complete failure of the battery... Moreover, as you probably know, the helicopter safety record is stained by mostly accidents traceable to obstacle collisions in flight and cfit, which could easily pertain eVTOL considered the similarities of the sector of operation...
@manp1039 Жыл бұрын
@@simoneglobemaster we will see as this technology evolves.. there is nothing prevent electric helicopters from co-existing with multi rotor electric flyying vehicles.. And likely they will co-exist for a time as technology continues to evolve. but the abilities of a multi rotor electric i think do have some advantages that can be exploited as well.
@jlangevin65 Жыл бұрын
@@simoneglobemaster A complete, sudden battery failure is extremely unlikely, but the machine could be built so that half of the rotors are powered by one battery and half by another. There are no such options for redundant power in conventional helicopters.
@simoneglobemaster Жыл бұрын
@@jlangevin65 Unlikely not impossibile, the helicopter still have one more chance to survive, a manouver called autorotation, that can not be performed by eVTOL. And even though it does not apply to every helicopter, the redundancy exist, is called multi engine
@taytaytay871 Жыл бұрын
These eVTOLs are gorgeous
@howardtibbsthethird 10 ай бұрын
Brilliant!!!!
@timothy2118 Жыл бұрын
EV's will never be a thing unless we move on from Lithium Ion Batteries. That is the real gating factor. I want EV's to be the future, but with the rising cost and demand for Lithium, I see the industry stalling if we don't come up with a better battery.
@sa8452 Жыл бұрын
Don't kid yourself. You're only a spectator--nobody cares what any individual wants
@joeking433 Жыл бұрын
Nah! You work for an oil company.
@heinousanus9352 Жыл бұрын
Wrong.
@joeking433 Жыл бұрын
@@heinousanus9352 He's just trolling you!
@lookingforwookiecopilot Жыл бұрын
Since electric flying machines don't burn off fuel, they don't get lighter as they fly around. Helicopters can be too heavy at their point of origin to land at their intended destination, but still take the flight if they are going to burn enough fuel on route to become light enough by the time they reach that destination. I don't know how common this is in the commercial world, but it will be an eVTOL limitation. Then there's the question of how long it takes to "re-chsrge" before they can take the next flight. A helicopter can re-fuel in like five minutes.
@lucn6173 2 ай бұрын
it is an ad for Archer and its collaboration with United Airlines.
@thelovertunisia 16 күн бұрын
I think the best long range solution would be diesel electric version where the diesel creates the power for the electric motors.
@dennissalisbury496 Жыл бұрын
Military spending will drive eVTOLS deployment and testing offering significant advantages over existing rotary wing designs followed by passenger airline applications.
@jeffreymartin6182 Жыл бұрын
Did he really just say they were carbon-free?
@FPVREVIEWS Жыл бұрын
carbon free emissions during operation, is more like it. hey, it's. step In a good direction. and with carbon composite airframes, if design is good, there is no fatigue life, so in theory can fly forever, unlike legacy airframes.
@Cardinal008 Жыл бұрын
The 25cm drone of my son is sooo loud when starting and flying. Don’t want to know the noice of these evolts!
@Valsiphez Жыл бұрын
So in PCs, bigger fans are quieter. How would smaller fans in evtol be quieter than helicopters?
@stevenhe198911 Жыл бұрын
At the time of social conflicts, new industrial revolution is more needed than before,so at least eVTOL is a start~ However since human used to build cities around rivers and roads for generations, if eVTOL want have more impact, I believe best ways is to build new concept of cities to prove it's advantage . But for now it seems how to integrate eVTOL travel to cities' current development is more practical option. Nevertheless my initial thoughts are :people who live in rual area maybe prefer to use eVTOL for work in central cities(due to high living cost ), but in that case the vehicle need to be designed to carry more passangers. And when you near the central area, eVTOL need to land a special station to avoid tall building collision(due to lack of AI control that support by huge data collection). And after landing ,passangers can switch l to bus (or else) to continue journey. So anyway, still a lot of work need to be done but at least it's a start.hmm
@lawrence.centinales 4 ай бұрын
we dont need more lanes we need more transpo. im sold.
@puggleski6097 Жыл бұрын
Not to mention truly unmatched energy inefficiency. Natural gas to electricity to battery storage to mechanical energy. Jesus. 10-15% efficiency at a maximum over the energy lifecycle.
@hubschenk1652 3 ай бұрын
Helicopters are expensive to maintain because of their complex mechanics. Their disadvantage is the limited top speed; Leonardo is trying to compensate for this shortcoming with the AW109 with an Osprey-like concept. Hardly successful due to the high price (we are talking about +$70 million). eVTOL is a promising solution, although the limited energy density of the batteries (weight/kWh) is currently a hindrance. Hydrogen-powered generators would be a solution for larger loads.
@ivychua4091 Жыл бұрын
Price ?
@R.E.A.L.I.T.Y 9 күн бұрын
CNBC forgot to add the best EVTOL Lillium
@jamaicasysbm2580 Жыл бұрын
Pure speculation of the growth of this technology
@eric4946 Жыл бұрын
Yeah it’s crazy to me how much money is going into this business model while pretending the regulations, will be like the ones people use for flying in cornfields privately, the demand will be like it is in the busiest cites in the world, and the infrastructure will just appear.
@hansmroch3214 7 ай бұрын
There is some disruption for people transport. However they can’t carry any payload so no heavy lift, no firefighting, etc… Show me any EVTOL that can lift 26000 lbs. There are well over 200 applications for electric air vehicles but only a couple are FAA approved. This is the same business model where helicopters were going to transport people all over the place, mail, etc, with all the same passenger terminals, etc..look up all the information on Los Angeles Airways. Heavy government subsidies, etc… There are also new risks having more electric motors because the control systems are only as good as the guys that programmed them. The flight models may also be drastically more different taking off and landing on top of buildings.
@aaroncouture Жыл бұрын
I wonder if these will be sold at the Catalina wine mixer?
@Matt-ru5rw Жыл бұрын
The fuc$in Catalina Wine Mixer.👏👏👏
@FPVREVIEWS Жыл бұрын
people are completely underestimating the potential of distributed propulsion electric aircraft, in terms of safety. NO single point of failure. even autopilot and battery.. and pilot.. etc. etc. and also underestimating the efficiency gains (6X) over conventional propulsion, giving them the range and performance needed to best fuel powered aircraft. also super low cost, and relieving pressure on existing infrastructure. nobody seems to get it. I guess you have to work on this tech to understand fully. even then it's inspiring to see it tested, and you see new ways to make it better and use cases. fun stuff.
@5414vivek Жыл бұрын
Can you imagine how much noisy our cities would be if hundreds these vehicles are flying in them.
@JoeZaccaris 11 ай бұрын
You seem to forget how quiet cities were before airports got built
@andrewo.9412 7 ай бұрын
Yeah, an EMS helicopter is usually loaded to the max with equipment plus crew. It’s a cool concept otherwise.
@imacuser101 Жыл бұрын
Why wouldn't you go for military applications first? I would think that would let you fast track that line to certification.
@brunogauthier1 Жыл бұрын
"Batteries will get better with time", or not. Unless a breakthrough in physic, the battery power to weight won't be able to compete with combustion engine.
@mh47saiyyad21 Жыл бұрын
Excellent technology.
@timgilreath3792 Жыл бұрын
In almost every industry now developers and engineers are saying everything will be powered by electric motors using batteries. If so many new things are going to require batteries are there actually enough raw minerals to produce all the batteries and to replace them as needed?
@trumptookthevaccine1679 Жыл бұрын
Is there enough oil? No. Resources are finite.
@timgilreath3792 Жыл бұрын
@@trumptookthevaccine1679 I didn't ask if there was enough oil.
@trumptookthevaccine1679 Жыл бұрын
@@timgilreath3792 pick what resources you want well deplete it quickly … minerals or oil
@Trag-zj2yo Жыл бұрын
They should also be autonomous, eliminating pilot cost
@devengudinas1649 Жыл бұрын
Ha
@Djanthonymosley Жыл бұрын
Don’t sleep on Air traffic controllers that’s gonna come with this
@nikobelic4251 Жыл бұрын
Air traffic management for these vehicles should eventually become automated allowing ATC to deal with more traditional traffic
@quackcement Жыл бұрын
floating helipads seem like a good idea could be placed along rivers direct access to road
@jamal_google_alajmi. Жыл бұрын
That so a shame why don't u reuse the reverse power for extra push however by changing the exact terbulence of any copter you can droped it down easily or we can use H2 gas but it might damaged it seriously
@msoldate Жыл бұрын
Battery weight is the biggest hurdle. Currently roughly 58 lbs of charged batteries equals 1 gallon of fuel about 6 pounds which gets lighter as the fuel gets used up where it doesn’t as the battery charge gets lower. If the battery tech gets lighter this industry will explode.
@godblessCL Жыл бұрын
You can even add a parachute at the top
@bubpori5105 Жыл бұрын
More Low Resistance Wing in Horizontal Flight .Dirigible Actuators for Vertical Lifting Body to Take off with Less Juice more Range !
@riverbankfisher Жыл бұрын
Ducted impellers would be much safer propulsion systems than these arrays of slice-and-dice Ginzu Knife propellers. The more spinning props within the dismemberment height of boarding passengers, the greater the odds that people might lose parts from straying into those props
@ryanwood6006 10 ай бұрын
Does anyone know how to get a career in this emerging industry?
@seaplaneguy1 2 ай бұрын
New Engine Type (NET) tech is combustion distributed power which makes all EVs obsolete. It is also 200 times less CO2 with RE fuels. EVs are obsolete in many ways. NET can fly 25 to 360 mph for roadable version or 0 to 360 MPH with VTOL version. Use gasoline, Ethanol, natural Gas. Make fuel for $1/gal. Active drag reduction cuts drag by 50%, no computers needed. NET costs about 20 times less than a Joby or Archer for 100 times more range. NET can have a taxi for 5 for around $100k and Joby/Archer are $2 mil. NET can replace the need for airlines, but EVs cannot. NET could have common man owning NET, but not with Joby or Archer...
@JimL. Жыл бұрын
Imagine working as an ATC when eVTOL becomes common. It's already a very stressful job as of now. 💀
@FPVREVIEWS Жыл бұрын
they will relieve ATC workload, because their flight paths will be automated, as well as the reporting. they can work in corridors, and not need supervision. and can update ATC themselves every second.
@symmetry08 Жыл бұрын
Battery will never get cheaper, as there are finite amound of resources.
@rodkeh Жыл бұрын
These flying deathtraps will never replace helicopters. Helicopters have been doing this job for decades and they do it far better and safer than any other VTO vehicle.
@gcb345 Жыл бұрын
Once upon a time, jet aircraft were flying death traps. Think about that the next time you see A FIGHTER PLANE SCREAM THE JET NOISE OF FREEDOM OVER YOUR HEAD.
@rodkeh Жыл бұрын
@@gcb345 What idiotic claptrap! You have to be an American!
@gcb345 Жыл бұрын
@@rodkeh Yes I am! BTW it was Americans who invented the airplane in the first place. It was also Americans that gave you windows, apple, and android. what ever device that you're replying on you can thank us! And if you're European, you can thank us for not living under Nazi or Italian fascism, or under the U.S.S.R's iron curtain. Have a great day. 😄
@rodkeh Жыл бұрын
@@gcb345As I said, "You have to be an American." Typical propaganda...
@gcb345 Жыл бұрын
@@rodkeh Hey, hey, hey, now. Wave the flag and turn up the rock-and-roll🎸 so high that your ears bleed when you say that! Otherwise I won't think you're sincere.😄
Diver-tudo
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
Bon Bon Media
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
CNBC International
Рет қаралды 70 М.
Aviation International News
Рет қаралды 65 М.