All of them stored in 16K 3D stereo ultra HD with extra metadata

@@cezarcatalin1406 :o That was a pretty good expansion of the pun. :D

The answer is to "stop it" just remeber to forget the memory and stop reenforcing that synaptic path /s

Not to worry - by the time you hit 50, you'll have forgotten pretty much all of it. Except for that asshat in English - that sucker's memories will ALWAYS be there. 😬

and the other half are memes and stupid facts

One of my favorite Simpsons jokes, thanks for reminding me. :)

wait...what? lololol

@@darkdialga777 Classic Simpsons, the early series were all pure gold.

Niceeeee😂😂😂

Speak out and remove all doubt! A

Our brains deem things with emotional associations very important. Negative emotions are especially significant; it's more important to remember and be able to avoid uncomfortable situations than to seek constant happiness at the cost of survival chances. Spelling is boring and unemotional. Listening to music is awesome and fun and probably has a positive social connotation for your brain :)

@@98Zai Emotion definitely plays a large part, since emotion and memories go hand in hand Its hard to try and think of memories with no emotion, unless they are things like how to write words

Annonimoose Q Motor memories are stored deepest as they deal with movement. That's why there is the saying that something is 'just like riding a bike' bc that kind motor coordination learned early will stay with you.

Brain is association machine. Linked information is good, abstract and isolated is bad.

I heard that the strongest emotions are the ones associated with smells.

I would say the operating system is the brain structure itself. So it's not stored anywhere. Like, the brain doesn't interact with itself to run a routine to imprint a memory for exemple (which computers do), the memory imprinting is just a natural result of the brain working.

Maybe about 50%? 😂😂😂

You are the OS. So every part of the brain is the OS. Your memories and learning shape who you are.

For some, probably alot, seeing how some people are soo full of themselves.

The boot ROM would be the brain stem

lolol

When your data gets corrupted randomly. You think of something else and immedietly forget what you were thinking about. I hate it so much

Whoever is stupid enough to pay premium prices for Apple products has far worse problems, than just data loss.

Frank Schneider thanks for inserting your ignorant, bigoted remark into what was simply a joke. Get a girlfriend, you’ll feel better about yourself.

@@dennisvance4004 The truth hurts, does't ?

LOL: Airhead!

640KB out to be enough for everyone

Laughs in 7kb

64bytes: hold my chips

Ok

We don't really understand how our brains store memories.

@@larrydavison8298 We don't really understand how anything works. Why are we here rather than not?

@@Kevin-sy8uf I'm here because I just took a shower and would like to dry off. You?

It's probably more like "Short answer: Is red faster than 7?" The mechanisms of action are so different that it is difficult to compare them meaningfully.

those are in the ram on the brain

Intelligent design. Not evolution

​@@deafbyhiphopbased on what evidence?

Eye witness testomony "I dunno man I think it was black guy with no hair." Cameras later found to have footage of the incident "I was a white male of about 35 years of age with full head of hair and a number of grey hairs, brown eyes, etc" Hell at least when a file is corrupted in PC it can be restored and yet with a lot more processing power and millions of years of evolution the human brain can only sometimes(people with crazy and rare impressive memorories) be nearly as good at storing and accessing accurate information that it evolved for millions of years. The human brain has been running on massive amounts of processing power for hundreds of thousands of years and evolving(microevolution) the whole time and computers have only been around for about 70 or so years and are often much better at many specific tasks.(assuming there is intelligent life imput anyway)

DRAM can forget data if you don't remind it about it in as little as 64 milliseconds.

A joke that Hertz 😉

Thanks for the likes!

You know the brain is more complex than i think it is

Hahahaha!!

its probably not digital?

I dOnT gEt iT mAn...

@@williandalsoto806 that's a biggest number I know

that"s Verr y good'f â sqriell. .. :

@@zack7122 lol

There is just one Data (Lore doesn't count)

Right! It's all about compression. In practice brain storage could be infinite, it just gets more compressed and tangled the more you learn.

Don't talk rubbish. The lower compression boundary has been defied by Shannon in his works to Information theory. Claiming the brain could infinitely compress data is just as reasonable as claiming the brain could created energy out of nothing. Why do you people talk such nonsense ?

@@frankschneider6156 and yet you can put 4-5 "items" in your short term memomry, and remember them fully no matter their actual size

Well back to meth for school exams then i guess

Well said. My "intelligent statement of the month" award I gift to you if you accept. We owe you a coke.

@@timothycurnock9162 haha thanks It's just leftover knowledge from one of my computer science assignments lol

@@everythingwho well technically computers can, you can plug in flash drives hard drives ssd's etc

Well old memories are constantly being forgotten, the size of memories themselves are likely very small, perhaps being encrypted by the emotions tied to them, since certain emotions or senses can instantly bring back memories If someone does actually hit the limit, anything could really happen A new disease that eats memory, physical pain from having to much memory, also eating memory Perhaps an overflow error, and the entire brain resets to 0, making the person remember nothing, not even how to walk, making them mentally like a newborn

There are other options, like DNA. Since it is *literally* a data-storage medium, it should be possible to use DNA to store memories, and compared to other media it has two major advantages (plus one possible third). Firstly it is easily duplicated yet remarkably stable, capable of surviving for thousands of years under the right circumstances. This means making backup copies of a memory would be relatively easy. Secondly, the data density for DNA storage is mind-bogglingly high. In theory you could store the sum total of all human knowledge in just a few grams of DNA, even with triple redundancy, so the memories of one sapient, even one millions of years old, would take up a tiny amount of space. The possible third advantage is that any organism which uses DNA to code for proteins etc. already has the physical mechanisms needed to code memories onto DNA. This makes it theoretically possible for DNA to augment human memory without any major changes to physiology outside of changes to our neurons, as memory-DNA could be stored within specialised organelles inside those cells. The key drawback is that, while synaptic memory is immediate-access, DNA memory would not be. Any encoded memories would have to be translated by mechanisms within the storage organelles, and after enough time there would be so much data within a brain that finding a specific memory might take a while. However even that has advantages, is it would require a degree of conscious management of memories. This means you could selectively dump all those embarrassing incidents at school into memory-DNA, and they'd stop troubling you at 3am in the morning because they'd no-longer be in your synaptic memory.

If they couldn't transcend that kind of limitation, I imagine that some process analogous to deduplication would take place.

Lol I forgot what I ate yesterday, as long as it's uneeded for survival (danger/source of happiness etc) and not needed in daily life (often activated) , every thing fade eventually I guess. Immortal beings with a human brain would probably forget easily what's beyond the 1 century mark honestly

You should get rid of unnecessary stuff. You don't really need to know, what your mother looks like, what your name is, how to use a toilet or how ro not drool on your clothes. Just get rid of that superfluous junk and use the thus freed space for more valuable things, e.g. the names of all Pokemons

If you add up a lifetime of sensory reception and factor in the limits of color/luminosity of sight, frequency/volume of hearing, and add a bit for haptic sensing, you come in around a petabyte of sensation. Since memories are formed from sense impressions and built-in instinct seems to be truly minimal in humans, this is a sort of maximum of what information a person can be exposed to. Thus our memories (even if perfect) can't exceed this amount. Which is a bit chilling; petabyte servers are rather common in today's server market, and even within the reach of (wealthy) consumers at a little over $100,000.00 (2019). And the price is going down; SSD storage just jumped to 8 Terabytes per unit (PCI mount) - expensive now, but cheaper as soon as production ramps up. So a paralyzed person could have a wide-screen, surround-sound system feeding them a normal lifetime's worth of experience. This rather than the sensory-deprivation lifestyle of only a few decades ago. With brain scanning (or some other feedback mechanism) they could even have interactivity for some multiple of this storage.

Wasn't that from the movie elysium or something haha

@Guillaume: Haven't seen that one. Ah, same director as District 9. I've got that one in the queue now, thanks.

2.5 petabytes actually

You also have to account that brains work with both electric impulses and chemical reactions. Which can make brain further diverge from computers.

I hear that memories are not "stored" but rather "reconstructed" each time they are invoked. So a memory is more like reactivation of the neuronal state you were in at a certain point (vision, touch, smell, meaning, etc). This also explains why memories are rarely static, they change a little bit everytime they are re-invoked, adding new thoughts and context each time. As for those that are not re-invoked and hold no significant emotional value... They fade... Because brain say : I shall not waste ressources on things useless for everyday life or survival.

@@lalaland1427 interesting, another question, if someone is more emotional/ sensitive, is his/her capacity to invoke memory better than other human?

@@never._.mind._.to answer "if someone is more emotional, is their capacity to invoke memory "better" than others ? ". Well there are several possible explanation I would say. (I'm not a specialist on the subject, I am just really interested. So please don't take my answer as an undeniable truth) To give a few explanations that seem realistic to me : - their "sensitive pathways", or neural networks involved in emotions could be more used than in other people (because of training, or they were raised to care for others for example, I don't know I'm giving ideas). The consequence would be that they have more connexions with other neural networks (thus more contexts in which "emotion" is coming up) The neural connexions could be faster too (as in, the electric signals pass faster, because neurons can facilitate the passage on some part of the network. Kind of like greasing the way to improve gliding) - the emotional sensitivity could also be related to genetics, maybe. Some people are more prone to depression for example (and addictions, it's kind of related, due to some chemical receptors being used in both situations) - sensitivity can also come from lack lf habituation. Example : you live in the cold every day of the year, you get kind of insensitive to the cold, especially compared to someone living in the sahara. Same thing with personal relationships : you live in a big city, you get kind of insensitive to the massive number of people around. Because brain says : it's normal, I don't need to pay attention to those stimuli I receive massively everyday. But people with less social interaction take in EVERYTHING and are more easily overwhelmed. Thus "extra-sensitivity" can also be a problem of paying too much attention, being unable to sort out what is relevant and what is not so much relevant. It's an unconscious attentional process, there are several kinds of attention, and this one is the "so fast it's barely noticeable, even less controlable" kind. It's like the attention you pay when a sudden loud noise happen. You usually don't control the flinch ( It can be trained though. Meditation for example is a good way to improve attentional concentration and learn to avoid undesired stimuli. Or crowd diving. Whatever suits you best). Some people have conditions provoking some problems with attention too (some forms of dislexia involve a reduced visual attention span for example, some schizophrens cannot pay attention to the right parts of a face when they are looking at someone, thus they become "emotionally weirded out" as in scared or absolutely certain the person wants to harm them because they can't read their expression correctly. So emotional sensitivity could also be related to the pattern your eyes make when looking at someone's face. Maybe an emotional person is lingering more on expressive areas ? Or they are able to decipherate more informations than the average person ? So many possible explanations, so I'm sorry, I can't answer your question very precisely, but I hope this helped you a little.

@@lalaland1427 thanks.. i'm very satisfied with your explanation, i shouldn't use "sensitive", i was referring to "emotional value" you mentioned earlier.. your point about out-of-ordinary stimuli made sense too, maybe people tend to remember something new/shocking than the ordinary stimuli.. i have other question, is the earliest human memory cannot be fully retrieved? or reconstructed as you said? or only the ones with emotional value can be remembered? have you ever triggered to remember your insignificant/ordinary long-term memory by certain stimuli? with no emotional value..

If i'm not wrong, you can't remember an image exactly, but details. You never remember a memory exactly, you recreate it from the details in you mind, that's why you can accidently alter your own memories. It is also why most peoples earliest memories are made up memories from before the brain is developed enough to to have long term memory. Therefore you cant visually remember a movie, and the longer you don't see it but recollect it, the more you change details and aspect of it. My ability to manipulate 3d shapes in my mind is superior to the average on IQ tests but i can't fully image the monalisa, just parts of it at a time

YOU WOULDN'T STEAL A CAR

@@EnGalenPerson My kid brain: "I would totally steal a car. Guess I'm doing the movie thing, too!

@@peter4210 I think Mona Lisa, and all the portions I've ever cared to notice come to mind. The more I've seen it, the closer attention I've paid, the clearer and easier the visualization becomes. Daydreaming in a way.

@@oddowlomen9921 yes but i dare you to see her smile in your mind and also think of the separation of the ground and the sky in the back ground at the same time and not lose details about her lips. If it takes you more then 1 try to keeps both in mind you probably altered your own memory to think of both at the same time, probably lost some details in the process and cant think if her right hand is on top of her left hand

That's a fast yet tiny computer

😂

Best of luck! :D

Good luck to you!! Happy passing out after the last test is finished. :)

Oh thank you guys! ☺️📖☕️🙏

And then - bar exams! Hang in there, you've got this! 👍

GODSPEED.

Never will get full the brain of a Very healthy 85 year old male who has been doing labor his entire life can recall a lot of odd jobs he did and still recall all the tools he used his entire life , he may not recall what he had for dinner 4 days ago . that kind of info is useless , but cooking a meal will be right at hand even if it wa something he had not cooked in 30 years. songs from 1934 to 2019 movies tv shows , all that is in the thought process . The Brain is a wonderful .

taskkill /f /im consciousness.exe

@@matthewcox7985 Oh fu....

#feelsbadman

And back then people were asking the same question. The answer was usually something like 10s of MBs.

Assuming Moore's Law holds out, quite a bit. I'm old enough to remember when having 100 MB on a hard drive you could hold in 1 hand was pretty impressive. Sealed hard drives for minicomputers could get to a gig or so, but took 2 people to pick up. Drives with dismountable disk packs were about the size of a small washing machine & held about 350 MB, give or take.

@@svenmorgenstern9506 Moore's law is coming to it's limit. It's becoming physically impossible to increase the number of transistors on CPUs because in good modern CPUs the width of conductors between the trasistors is something like 9 conductor ATOMS! It's insane. Now we'll just have to wait for quamtum computers or something to compleatly break the law

Sven Morgenstern I started with 8” floppy drives and a reel to reel tape storage system. Then moved onto cassette tape for storage. That was revolutionary.

The fact that they can store gigs on something literally the size of a stamp still boggles my mind. I mean I understand it. Its just the fact that we figured it out and can mass produce millions of them for next to nothing is what gets me. We're living in star trek. Lol

No, it's an educated wild guess because it is: 1- Cutting edge. 2- Trying to compare 2 very different systems. Trying a more established theory, and you'll get better answers. Try a mathematical theory, and you'll get %100 definite answers %100 of the time.

What is the joke? Unless faster means more capacity( it does not as far as I know) I do not get it.

@@cornlips7247 at the start of the video they said they use hard drives but most people just use SSD's now

@@alan202 I must have missed them saying that thank you. I doubt Stats would back up that most people claim though. A lot do but I would guarantee it is not most people yet.

@@alan202 ssds are expensive. I have one but it's for the operating system files

@@Azaelris no they're the cheapest they have ever been right now, 1 tb for around $100 and it's in m.2 form factor so no wires just stick into the motherboard and faster than SATA

Great comment. A year ago the comment section of any of Olivia's vids was full of negative comments about her appearance. It's great to see that has stopped.

Ayyy ryback. It's time to feed your brain. Feed me more.. ahhhh...

der Jakob I think you have to ask a more specific question. Because there are different types of information and regions of our brain are specialized for processing different information. Everyone that has been born can store information in their brain. The problems come in how the brain interprets it, if it interprets it at all, and how we respond consequently.

That actually is a better question lol nice. Amnesia and other memory related ailments aren't really well understood

Their sata connector broke

@@moki2093 I think their logic gate has malfunctioned

Bad sectors or firmware.

To be fair, the brain wasn't evolved to use its memory like it would in modern day Humans would memorize hunting strategies, friends, enemies, animals, locations, food, weather, natural disasters, and a few other stuff, but nothing along the lines of what modern humans have to learn now No fancy math, no weird false memory tricks, no easy way of spreading knowledge, it would probably make it a lot easier for a feral human to retrieve memories, though its unclear, since feral humans are very rare, and cant learn to talk

Megamind: Hold my brain

Max Salmon Where are you planning to plug it ? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

I thought the same thing, but after taking another look into it, I'm sure I was just thinking about DNA storage. Look into it. The amount of information that can be stored in a gram of DNA is enormous.

But you remembered English. So I'd say at least +67kb

Bro you in every video i watch