#3 0:39 what are cammers details so we can report to the police?

Came here to say that. Cammer is raging here. Slams on the brakes, and then floors it when the yellow car tries to go around the brake checker. Something tells me there is a lot more to this video.

And then stops in the through lane to continue the rage.

Here in AZ, speeding up to prevent another driver to get in front of you is a misdemeanor. And this is exactly what the cammer did. I hope the insurance companies involved notice that.

@@Tomcatt817 Yeah, and that grey car on the right starts slowing down and moving over before anything actually happens (in the clip), so it seems like they were aware some bad stuff had been and was about to be going down.

@@bigbill2444 ALmost all states it's the same, but tough to enforce.

"I'll deal with that later. I have yelling to do!" - that guy, probably.

😜😜😜😜😜😜

Idk why the cam driver muted it until the last second.

@@macmiller1678 I wish he had muted his fake laugh.

@@macmiller1678 you just have to turn your volume all the way up. You can hear he’s listening to run run Rudolph and then he honks. I think his laugh was really loud so the other driver (who got out of his car) could hear him .

This, at a 2-way stop, vehicle going straight has right of way regardless of who stopped first. I've almost been hit by irate left turners yelling "i was here first" too many times to count.

@@moorkowbellI understand this is the general consensus, but I haven't found a place where it is actually a written law. Here in Indiana it isn't explicitly written. From what I understand general practice is treat it like you would a stop light (straight and right turns have right of way) like you said, but I've also seen where they just cite both people if an accident occurs. I always attempt to let the guy turning left go if they were there first and both ways are clear (waving them through) as it is generally harder to find a clearing. Kindness goes a long way.

In Washington State straight over left turns is always the rule the only exception is at four way intersections. First person at the stop gets right of way. If you both arrive at the same time person to the right has right of way. I never take anything for granted though because you have so many impatient drivers who forget everything when they load themselves in their wheeled weapons of doom, and destruction. It's all, "look out world here I go! I drive now!"😊

That’s not what she said.

You left out: - Cammer tailgating way too close to the truck in front at the start of the video. Something definitely happened before the start of the video that cammer doesn't want us to see.

I Came here to say the same thing. Cam car is just as stupid. I’d be curious what the police and insurance said

That's not all that was going on - notice the car in the right lane is already WAY over on the line when they come into view?

People are completely oblivious on the road.

The camer definetly could have been looking ahead and read the situation better.

@@mr.drippy4874WTF? 1.2 seconds elapsed between the brake lights and the collision. Are you seriously suggesting that a HD tow rig could have avoided that?

Do you not understand the physics of a big rig?

@@spamlessaccountNo, drippy is right. Not the truck’s fault but they could’ve proceeded with caution 2-5 secs before. It was obvious traffic is slowing down that part of the road.

You're correct. The cammer was supposed to yield for traffic going straight through.

I understand this is the general consensus, but I haven't found a place where it is actually a written law. Here in Indiana it isn't explicitly written. From what I understand general practice is treat it like you would a stop light (straight and right turns have right of way) like you said, but I've also seen where they just cite both people if an accident occurs. I always attempt to let the guy turning left go if they were there first and both ways are clear (waving them through) as it is generally harder to find a clearing. Kindness goes a long way.

It's not deliberate when the car drives across YOU

@@spamlessaccount It's deliberate when you keep your foot on the accelerator👍 Two clowns road raging.

Dumb take, how was it his accident (besides the normal insurance BS of a rear end) when a dipshit does something stupid in front of him? Tbh, guy had a solid juke move to avoid it.

Yeah exactly, he admits he doesn't know what is happening, maybe he shouldn't be driving.

No kidding. Cammer going almost 50 mph in a 40 zone through a stale green light in a busy intersection. Bad idea after bad idea after bad idea.

You're right, I did try to blame them and don't know how to drive so I turned my license in. We're all safe now!

@@spoolindsm127 good.

I understand this is the general consensus, but I haven't found a place where it is actually a written law. Here in Indiana it isn't explicitly written. From what I understand general practice is treat it like you would a stop light (straight and right turns have right of way) like you said, but I've also seen where they just cite both people if an accident occurs. I always attempt to let the guy turning left go if they were there first and both ways are clear (waving them through) as it is generally harder to find a clearing. Kindness goes a long way.

@@DDock3287except when kindness causes confusion, and confusion on the road is dangerous. If we all follow the law or what the general consensus says best practice is in any give situation on while driving then we all know what to expect of each other and everything is much safer and more smooth. When we’re “nice” like the goofball in one of the earlier clips who stopped in the middle of the road to let someone through, it causes confusion, and definitely potentially dangerous situations. It’s by far best to do what is expected over what is courteous on the roads.

​@@DDock3287I'm also in Indiana. I was taught in driver's ed that the first one at their stop sign has the right-of-way.

@@vickiweber4718only at all way stops, not 2 ways!

vehicle in this case didn't have the right of way. Right of way always goes to the person that gets to the stop sign first which was the cammer. Person going straight only gets the right of way if it is a "tie" or too close to tell who got to the sign first. In this case the cammer was at the stop sign long before the car going straight. The cammer had the right of way. Car going straight was at fault.

@@pacman3556 you are incorrect. "First" rule only applies to 4-way stop. All other intersections, left turn yields. This is clear in Florida statutes ch 316.121, 122, and 123 (FL used as example, but all states have similar rules)

Exactly, that is what i commented too.

@@pacman3556 You are incorrect. Unless it is a four way stop, the vehicle which is going straight through has the right of way and the turning vehicle needs to yield. I recommend you review basic traffic laws to avoid getting into a collision in the future.

WRONG@@pacman3556

I understand this is the general consensus, but I haven't found a place where it is actually a written law. Here in Indiana it isn't explicitly written. From what I understand general practice is treat it like you would a stop light (straight and right turns have right of way) like you said, but I've also seen where they just cite both people if an accident occurs. I always attempt to let the guy turning left go if they were there first and both ways are clear (waving them through) as it is generally harder to find a clearing. Kindness goes a long way.

@@DDock3287 "kindness" is knowing right of way Law.

the sedan was in the intersection before it was red

Even if the sedan was in the intersection, he still has to make sure oncoming traffic is stopping before turning left, so yes, both are at fault.

@@durrrrl3435 Well obviously not, the jeep was found at fault.

@@ZemzyOseris just because the text says that doesn’t mean it’s true.

@@durrrrl3435 Yes it does, I'm the one who submitted the video.

Yeah, this clip isn't so much about "bad driving" on the part of the trucker in front. Apparently, he was having a problem that he was having to pull over for. He was waiting for the truck in the right lane to pass.

that behavior is common all over Philadelphia

Insurance company: you're at 90% fault

@@sunfishdinner Some will try it.. is there anything else you could have done to avoid this. How about someone does you like this in your personal vehicle and see if you do any better than I did. No?? Then you have your answer.

I hope the farmer is liable for the damages caused

I jumped 😭 poor cows. Did they all die? 😨

@@post5032 not likely. It's an animal strike, no different than hitting a moose or deer. There's no way to prove the farmer "left the gate open" and that it didn't just come open somehow. This is why all trucks should have animal guards. With a Herd bumper, this probably would have resulted in little to no damage (to the truck, still heartbreaking for the poor cattle).

Montana is an open range state. Truck insurance will pay him for his cows most likely.

More importantly, neither is blindly pulling across an active lane of traffic.

These vids have saved my butt from people doing that. I always watch for gaps in the row of cars, where people can turn through.

@@spamlessaccount But people do and that is why you should proceed slowly and cautiously

Not if she was sitting there first.

@@Barkley2010 yes, even if she got there first. A turning driver is ALWAYS responsible to be sure that the way is clear.

@@Barkley2010 this concept only applies if both parties have no one else to yield to.

@@Barkley2010 *WRONG* you need a refund from your driving school.

@@spamlessaccount if I come to stop and I’m going straight and someone opposite of me has been sitting there then they go first. You’re selfish!

No they don’t. The cammer was waiting there well before the truck across the street got there. If they got there at the same time though, then yeah you’re right

@@ediblepinevideosit is a 2 way stop, when you get to a stop sign does not matter in that case. However, straight has right of way over a left turn. Arrival time matters only at a 4 way stop.

@@ediblepinevideos I looked up the laws for my state - Michigan - and it states that the left turn has right-of-way only if the vehicle is already in the intersection. In this case it is not, and left turn must yield even if it arrived at the intersection first since this is not a 4 way stop.

Not all cars do that.

Instant ground beef.

In my part of Canada, farmers are liable if their livestock get hit and damage vehicles. I don't understand why he wasn't liable!

I've always been taught that when you have two cars at an intersection opposing each other, and both have come to a stop at a stop sign, then the "left turn yields to straight" rule applies, regardless of whether one car technically arrived at the intersection before the other. The idea is that you never want the left turning car to turn across the path of the car going straight, you want them going behind the car going straight.

@@Blahladeeda Ain't that for a four way stop though? Down here that's the rule for 4 way stops, then for the two way stops obviously you yield to the cross traffic, then straight, then left turns. Also I too am a massive supporter of a sort of "continuing education" for drivers, cause lots of folk down here need two things: A driving test, and a friggin therapist 🤣

@@Blahladeeda Wrong. Even though the pickup arrived second, he has the ROW over the cammer since cammer was turning left. One must pretend the stop signs are actually red traffic lights. When the light goes green, who goes? The straight or right turners, then the left turners. The general "first-to-stop, first-to-go" ONLY applies to All Way stops.

​@@Blahladeedaper Quora, a social media website, you are correct. However, per the law in ALL 50 US States, you are incorrect. People like you should double check your source. I agree with you that those misinformed should retake a written test as well as preform a driving test to renew your license

I understand this is the general consensus, but I haven't found a place where it is actually a written law. Here in Indiana it isn't explicitly written. From what I understand general practice is treat it like you would a stop light (straight and right turns have right of way) like you said, but I've also seen where they just cite both people if an accident occurs. I always attempt to let the guy turning left go if they were there first and both ways are clear (waving them through) as it is generally harder to find a clearing. Kindness goes a long way.

From WA State: if the driver was making a legal right turn when a bicycle traveling behind the car failed to slow down to yield to the car, then the bicyclist may be liable if he strikes the car.

Note that at about 2:34, you can see the solid white line becoming broken. That means the car is allowed (and required in California) to move over and block the bike lane for a turn precisely to stop this sort of thing from happening.

@@brucewalton1886 WOW! I didn't know that. Thanks for the good info. Also, the cyclist has a kid on the back, wouldn't you be more careful?

Moped

In my _city,_ it is illegal to cut across a lane to make a right turn and the red car would be cited for not properly merging. The dashed lines are a tell-tale sign that the location in the clip most probably has similar laws to my city.

He wasn’t even that close to the person in front of him lmao shut up nerd 😂

You are one of the reasons people need dash cams.

@@roguedisciple2966 I’m stating the facts

Thanks for the constructive comment. I think my distance was fine, the car in front reacted really late as you usually don't expect cars to come to a stop when the light is green. Similarly I reacted late but was able to avoid a collision from the sudden, unexpected stop. Also doesn't make it okay but nobody follows the speed limits in Chicago lol and regardless any left turning vehicles should be able to gauge distance and speed accurately and safely.

SAME lol

Me Me Me! Even, we have burry the whole hitting part so I think it safe to see.

@@MegaDrivingSchool Well THANK you!! Even if it's blurred I would still skip it. I am a HUGE animal lover and don't wanna cry at work LMAO.. thank youuuuuuuu ❤

It's even funnier if you loop it. I ran it about half a dozen times and it just gets better each time.

You can tell the cammer brake checked him we just don’t know why.

​@@ranlive1brake checked, then straight up rammed them... Completely avoidable by cammer... Should be 100% campers fault

Brake check

@@yungkidnf a rear view camera would have been good

​@DJJumpdancer he probably has one. But doesn't want to show us proof of his stupidity

the sedan was.

I get your point but regardless, the gold car still has to avoid rear-ending the SUV.

his turn signal is a good start lol

While I understand this is the general consensus, I haven't found a place where it is actually a written law. Here in Indiana it isn't explicitly written. From what I understand general practice is treat it like you would a stop light (straight and right turns have right of way) like you said. I've also seen where they just cite both people if an accident occurs. I always attempt to let the guy turning left go if they were there first and both ways are clear (waving them through) as it is generally harder to find a clearing. Kindness goes a long way. Also, if you can cite some sort of law it would be helpful, I haven't found one yet. It's grabbed my curiosity to find it a few times now.

@@DDock3287 the law is saying you have to yield to traffic from your left correct? A car coming from the opposite side of the road is on your left….! The same law is saying that if you don’t have a green arrow and you change direction…so left or right you have to yield to all traffic…

Ima go with the story they were trying to recreate lettys infamous slide under the trailer in fast n furious 😂

@emmanuelmartinez5588 No, I think they were trying to emulate Burt in Smokey and the Bandit. :-)

The car had already started pulling out when the car in front of the cammer turned. I would have slowed down. But, all that matters to a lot of these cammers is "having the right-of-way." So, they continue on into a dangerous situation, then blow their horns, usually resulting in what you see here.

Normal behavior in Philly

They're supposed to ask for permission to use the clip. But when I did give permission once, they edited the clip and made it look like I was at fault with the missing clip.

Incompetence. Cammers lane ended and he doesn't understand the concept of a yield.

Considering what's at steak, I have no beef with your comment. And that's no bull.

That's why the law requires you to merge _into_ the bike lane before turning.

I love it when they come on here to defend themselves in the comments

@@MMMRCHPCTB I haven't seen them do that yet.