Go to tryfum.com/VANGELINASKOV and use code VANGELINASKOV to save an additional 10% off your order today.

I just cant get over how this started to come out because she accused a laywer for copyright infringment....

So....Oz was the ONLY petson who could provide care? The sister and friend couldn't do it? She couldn't hire someone? My eyes hurt from rolling so far.

Oz caring for Blair while she was sick was a kindness. Not a requirement. Hire an in home nurse. And she SHOULD pay rent. She willingly payed it. Therefore, it was a legal transaction. Hacked her computer? Or the person "with memory issues" left it unlocked. So, she took someone else's private documents that she wrongfully acquired, along with their personal belongings, without giving the person who owned said documents and items time to remove them from the vehicle, and she read them?! She is ADMITTING to reading private documents she shouldn't have had?! 16:07

In 2020 I was hospitalized with a severe infection that required me to undergo multiple surgeries and spent a month in the hospital. During that time I was given fentanyl, ketamine, oxycodone, and dilauded alone and in combination. The medications made me sleep. A lot. Apart from the the times I was put under entirely, I do not have any form of memory loss. Without an impartial witness such as a doctor, I call BS. I don't trust ANYTHING Blair says.

I don't think Blair knows what singlehandedly means.

What in the actual fuck is Blair even going on about?

$10 says the judge wanted to see what bullshit she would serve up

She's trying to pull the classic criminal move of claiming "selective amnesia".

This girl needs to be in therapy and be 100% honest and vulnerable. The way she thinks everyone is out to get her and not realizing her own behavior is bizarre. She sounds severely mentally unwell

I suspect the court is "giving her enough rope to hang with". If they give her EVERY chance to prove her case and she keeps mucking it up, there's no way it can be contested, easily appealed or re submitted for trial

What baffles me is the claim that Oz took advantage of her when she was basically black-out intoxicated on pain killers to get mortgage payments from her illegally. YET when confronted he agreed to pay her back legally including a contract? If he's a criminal content with stealing from drug addicts why would he ever pay it back?

Ref: 4:30 I take 26 tablets a day (9 different meds and I am 56) and I don't act like she does at all, medication is not an excuse for how she is and I take shiteloads so have some experience with this.

If I were the judge, I would be asking for receipts: Doctors notes, Medication, Testimony from the doctor about the pills and memory loss from her follow-up, proof from the doctor that she care for herself, proof she almost needed to be rehospitalized (should be doctors notes on that), and receipts of any financial transactions, proof her sister was in the area at the time to witness the statements.

“Attempting to get revenge” Man that is MASSIVE projection on Blair’s part

Blair uses the VTuber avatar in her very, very occasional streams. Also, Blair, your reputation is already dead in the water, you've lost the PR war.

Whether Oz went into Blaire's computer or not doesn't really matter - he could have done it, he could have not - that's not what the lawsuit is about; in the end, it doesn't matter, and it's just an attempt to poison the judge's opinion of Oz in order to try and make the judge feel inclined to side with Blaire.

Every time I see a video about Blair, I just think "wow, this all started because she thought Legal Eagle was ripping her off... and look how far we've come!"

I genuinely don't understand what she's trying to prove here. maybe 5% of the info she's provided COULD be relevant if you squint, but literally none of this is court-worthy.

I hope Oz's lawyer is able to get a Dr (or whoever would work best) to dispute her memory claims, if it would even be beneficial to Oz. I know some experts charge a fee to testify, but I really don't want Blair to win a damn thing.

I can't imagine she's going to be able to prove any of this. She's really not citing any evidence, and her stuff about pain killers straight up just isn't believable. I think the judge is giving her every chance to make her case before he throws it out.

So, to get this straight: she thinks that each person has worked together to single-handedly take her down?

This probably me being nitpicky but that fact she says ALMOST hospitalized is kinda manipulative. Cause if she was hospitalized, she would need to/have proof. It’s an attack on character since it is near impossible to disprove/prove this claim’s validity.

Shes talking into a void. Does she even have a small audience now?

Hey there! ADHDer here. Working Memory is one of the biggest struggles with ADHD, and if that's the only kind of memory that's even slightly affected, it makes her claim even weaker. Working memory usually deals with specific data, not whole events. For example, if someone's reading you a recipe, a normal person might be able to remember the first 5-8 ingredients. Someone with working memory issues (like an ADHDer) might only remember the first 3 ingredients, and then the first slot gets replaced with the 4th bit of data. So a normal person might remember: 1. eggs 2. milk 3. cheese 4. flour etc. While someone with working memory issues might look more like: 1. ???? flour?? 2. milk 3. cheese?? 4. flour But it's not a black void. You're aware you've forgotten, so you just ask the person to repeat it. You don't forget that you're working on a recipe, or that someone was telling you the recipe. I'll bet you anything she saw 'memory loss' under possible side effects and just decided that was a good excuse. Super dumb, but not at all surprising. The YT channel How To ADHD has a short video on working memory if you're interested in a better explanation.

It's so blatant that she has nothing to really go on. She's been told by the court multiple times that the case will get thrown out if she doesn't provide proof of her claims, and each time she's submitted an amendment it's instead just added MORE baseless claims, instead of backing up any of the claims made so far.

Her repossessing the car before he moved is huge no no. You can't take it back because of intent. Up until he actually moved out of Colorado and only then would she be able to claim breach of contract. You can't take the car away, claim you found intent to relocate, and then use that evidence to then claim breach of contract (when it isn't) and justify why you took the car in the first place.

Her lawyer is trying to claim that each separate incident is solely responsible by explicitly comparing one month from one year to the same month the next year. Each incident is a different month. THAT'S NOT HOW THIS WORKS. If her viewership was on a steady decline throughout the year, each month of course would show a drop, and no single incident could be responsible for things. Holy freaking crap.

I've been on some *serious* painkillers, including a period of time when I was "riding the brown horse", if you will (you know, that substance that was causing 90s musicians to drop like flies...). Never had problems with remembering things. I'd forget things if I blacked out whilst drinking alcohol, but never with certain brown powders or their medical counterparts. Blair's full of it. And based on her past behaviour, ain't *NO* WAY she would just meekly say to Oz "oh, I said I'd pay you? Okie dokie, guess I must've said it, so I guess I'll just give you money!" ...nevermind the fact that this seemlingly happened while Oz still owed her money on the ever-growing ledger she kept on him. SURELY she would've just said "I'll take it off your bill" at most (you know, that bill that kept growing even whilst they lived together as a couple & she made exponentially more than he did...). I smell something very unpleasant from Blair's filing.

I actually do suffer from a "missing time" and "warped time" effect that sort-of encloses the period of time that I am on narcotic pain killers and I'm actually rather sensitive to them as well (root canal infection only needs 2mg hydrocodone to disappear) but I *do not* forget the events that happened, I'm just unable to place them accurately in 'yesterday' and 'last friday' reference. I would say the likelyhood is that somebody is also in Denver for the additional recreational benefits and mixed up some things like 'personal responsibility' and 'self indulgence' while on such a medication. I doubt the judge is going to buy the memory-loss crap.

Chronic pain patient here, I’ve been on and researched nearly all narcotics available. They do not mess with memory unless you take waaaaay more than is prescribed. Street drug levels of some meds will definitely make the nervous system wonky in the extreme. But not if she was taking any safe and realistic dose.

It sounds like they are trying to paint OZ in the same light as she has been painted.

So there’s a problem with Blair’s accusations, everyone else can back up their claims with screenshots and proof. She can’t,

That legal document reads as if Blair’s lawyer just transcribed some of her diary pages. What a mess. I WAS a big fan of her channel before the truth about her came out and I’m still amazed at how she single-handedly tanked her own KZfaq career. Absolutely ridiculous.

I am a pharmacy student in the US. From what I see in my studies and at my job, the most common narcotics prescribed after surgery are Norco and Percocet (hydrocodone and oxycodone, respectively). I am very familiar with these medications, and there have not been any claims of amnesia from using them from any patients I have met, nor have I found any clinical studies that have found this.

shes legally digging herself a hole. proving narcotics impaired her memory is going to be WAAAY harder than she thinks. in court you cant just claim that, lots of people are on pain meds.

Hopefully she gets dismissed with prejudice so she can never file again.

For the "hacked her computer" bit - I believe it was stated that she had already moved out, with all devices alongside her, so I wonder when and how he got this alleged computer access

Her pushing memory loss is not only silly but puts any other part of what she says into question. How can we be sure she remembers things correctly when she is also saying that large sections of time are just absent from her memory?

I gotta love how she tries to bullshit her way through the contract she made Oz sign to bankrupt him by acting as if he tried to coerce her to get money while she was on meds and doesnt remember it but her sister does remember. The sister which btw she basically accused of being an irresponsible employee and put the blame on for making her lose money in her crypto farm iirc she said caught on fire because of her sister's negligence. So we're supposed to believe a witness she herself undermined the character of in previous statement. Funny how that works when she needs to use someone, suddenly they're reliable, but when she loses money she puts the blame on them and theyre suddenly the worst people. Which is it Blair? Also, what is this lie doing in a defamation lawsuit when it doesnt have anything to do with anything? 😂

I’m a pharmacist and narcotics for short term use wouldn’t make you lose your memory. It’s possible to talk in your sleep because they will make you drowsy. But for short term post surgical use. I’ve never heard of memory loss.

She just won't fucking stop.

The whole "I don't remember but they do" thing sounds to me like she's trying to get someone else to commit perjury for her 🤔 I'm pressing X to doubt.

I think the “plotting” part is Oz reacting out to the other creators and asking for forgiveness for his role in enabling Blare.

I love how Blair implies that she believes that what she says is law. By way of my previous statement, I believe Blair is also under the impression that she is also a 3 yr old in charge of other toddlers.

If Blair said the sun exists I'd still have to go check. No one is ever gonna believe anything shes gonna say, her personal and profesional image are ruined

Isn't it also super weird how she's breaking up the "time periods"? It should be annual to get a clear picture, or maybe comparing one whole month to the next whole month, but instead she's intentionally taking weird little snippets of time. It makes me wonder if she's intentionally starting from right after she got a deal/promo/ad check to not include it, and cutting right before another big one (so essentially cherry picking dates where she didn't receive actual payments to make it look like a bigger difference, even tho payments were maybe on the way or had just been received)

About the memory loss: Let's go with the assumption that everything Blair says is 100% true. From her own words: 1. When she couldn't remember things because of the drugs, Oz tried to coerce her to give him 6 months of mortgage payments, but her sister and friend stopped him. 2. When she was off the drugs, Oz reminded her of her "promise" and she, not remembering having made that promise, gave him the money. 3. Later, she convinced Oz that he had coerced the money out of her, and Oz agreed to pay it back, first over a 2 year term but then finally over a 10 year term. ASSUMING all that is true... how is Blair damaged in any way from this? She didn't give him money at step 1. At step 2, she could have said "I don't remember that, so lets talk (or refuse outright)", but she didn't. And step 3 sounds an awful lot like what Oz said in his video.... she kept a ledger of debt, and this is just one example of it. Something that she gifted him is suddenly something he owes back. With interest!

If I recall correctly, Oz didn't state specifically how he learned about Blair cheating on him (that is how he phrased it due to him not being aware they were broken up since that didn't come out until later when all this started to come out, when his statement that she cheated came out and she decided to say it wasn't cheating since they were broken up, which is why he called it cheating) he did talk about how he was doing some work on her computer that she had asked him to do, or probably demanded, so there are bits and pieces she has put together from different time frames and incidents, but she is spinning it to look like she was the victim. Everything she claims Oz did to her is what she did to him. It's straight up projection on her part.

I took hydrocodone after I broke my arm and I totally have memory lapses from that time.

For the sake of Oz, Felix, and Wonder, I hope the case is dropped so they don't have to deal with it anymore. But on the other hand, I want to see this go to court so Blair can be the next Amber Herd

So, I had part of my brain removed and was on narcotics for quite a while. I knew what was happening around me. I couldn’t always express myself but I knew what was happening.

If she hasn't provided proof for any of her claims with this latest submission, I suspect the judge won't give her a third chance to do so.

I'm not a lawyer but it seems weird to include the "revenge" part in the text. It implies that Blair has done something wrong towards the defendants, which doesn't seem like the kind of thing you want to put in the mind of the judge or jury. Obviously everyone online who knows about the situation already thinks that she has, but she probably shouldn't be telling the judge.

I hope the theory that she is been allowed to show all her crap by the judge so he can ban her from presenting lawsuits in the future...i hope that's true

It is baffling Blair (and her lawyers) are so disconected from reality, that they think this would go in their favor if they get to trial. The defendats her only have to point to other people critical of Blair at the same time as she was "losing revenue due to defamation" and this whole lawsuit will be thrown out. The only logical explanation I can think of is, this was an intimidation tactic (considering how this lawsuit started), but she didn't expect people to donate legal funds to people she is suing, so she is now panicing and throwing everithyng at the wall and hoping something sticks.

I was on oxycodone, off and on, for about four or five years total. I have also taken percocet and dilauid. Mostly, it made me pass out rather than putting me in a fugue state where I could act but didn't remember what I had done. That said I think it certainly puts one in a vulnerable and suggestible state. So it's not outside the realm of possibility that someone could be manipulated into signing something, but it sounds like she is trying to claim complete memory loss which seems like a huge overstatement. Also like does she realize she is admitting to cheating on him?

I note that at 20:02, Blair states that she was “paying almost 300K of [Oz’s] expenses.” According to Oz, he signed loan documents for app 180K-ish of debt (App 50K-ish to Blair and 130K-ish to her company based on the foreclosure document, those aren’t round numbers but it’s ballpark). Blair has said in her leaked discord messages that “Oz took 200K from me.” So… where did this extra 100K come from?

I wear sunglasses all the time. I’ve got blue eyes and they were just not made for the sun 😂

How come no one is talking about her deleting her whole channel?

Early crew wya? 🎉

10:05 It doesn't matter if she was having memory issues or not since even according to her own story, she gave the money when she was off the medications and was aware of what she was doing. It doesn't matter if he lied that she promised (which I take with a grain of salt because Blaire is a known liar now) because she was not under the influence when she agreed to honor the supposed promise, whether real or not. Along with whining that he wouldn't keep providing free care for her, she's just inserting random and pointless things that do not carry any legal weight in order to try and make Oz look bad. I am so glad the judge accepted her late amendment because it increases the chances the judge can dismiss it with prejudice and make sure Blaire never bothers Oz about any of these matters again. It might seem cruel in the moment to let it keep dragging on, but dismissing it now would open the door for her to keep repeating this and dragging it out much much longer.

I've heard it said elsewhere, but it's very likely the Judge is being 'lenient' with Blair to minimize the potential for an appeal once they finally end the lawsuit, potentially with prejudice [meaning Blair wouldn't be able to just refile and start it again; the issue would be considered done and over.] The Judge is cooperating with Blair so she has no ammo against the Court should she try to return and accuse the court of any misconduct or being 'unfair' to her. It's happened in several other 'viral' cases as well, where the judges of cases seem to be very 'forgiving' with the problematic party, far more than normal or usual. They're being cautious, to make sure whatever ruling happens actually sticks and can't be overturned on appeal. Likely because the judges are aware that these cases are in the public eye and are being scrutinized more than other cases. They're being careful to do things exactly correct. The judge in this case being lenient with Blair is a GOOD thing. Blair, with these sorts of documents and inability to follow the Judge's instructions, is doing little more than hanging herself right now. She's trying the court's patience, and using up all their good will. Her side's pleadings are so terrible that they are going to loose; they don't hold any weight and they aren't up to the proper standard (hence the judge requesting more specificity.) It's only inevitable. It's more than likely the judge will grant a motion to dismiss, and by giving Blair so many chances to do things correctly, and her dropping that ball, opens up the possibility it'll be granted with prejudice. This is the result we all want, because it prevents Blair from refiling and continuing to financially/emotionally ruin Oz, Wonder and Felix (at least on the same claim). We want her to not be able to just drag them all back into another lawsuit. The Court's playing carefully, and letting Blair ruin herself, so that if/when they rule against her, there's nothing she can do about it; it'll have been all the result of her own incompetence.

the whole computer access thing won't wash in court, they've little tolerance for that kind of bs. The whole thing comes down to whether what the defendants said and claimed is truth. It would not surprise me in the least if 90% of the attacks 'etc' in comments against her were done as revenge by those who felt her videos wronged them somehow. The car rental agreement itself may have had stipulations for area of operation and the insurance on it would DEFINITELY have limitations on region. 106 .... sounds like a Skills Issue...

As someone who’s prescribed oxycodone which is a Schedule II narcotic used to treat moderate to severe pain I can confirm I have blank moments where I forget things.

Blair: The meds make, you forget. Judge: What's your source? Blair: My source is, I made it tf up.

She seems to have no concept of what people think of her, thanks for your videos, I trust what you say far more than anything that comes out of her mouth / ar$e.

So Blair puts her health capabilities at issue in a lawsuit. That is now something the opposite party can take up and ask the court to have her do medical tests to see if this is true. Just why do that. This is not going to go well if this continues to an actual trial.

BRB finding Blair's contact info so I can remind her about the $5000 she doesn't remember promising to give me, but she absolutely did promise to

I am happy to see you here and uploading. You have a lot of support in the community about the nastiness you were under fire about. Hopefully you remain strong.

@3:40 The only times I've heard of memory loss while on pain medication have also involved alcohol

When I'm in a yapping and lying competition and my opponent is a pyramid woman with naughty in her username:

Do you want to bet that the new car that he lease, or at least that was referenced, is the same one lent to wonderstruck.

Lmaoooo if someone says they were on pain pills and that “it affected their memory” that’s just code for “I’m abusing the shit out of these and the addiction is clouding my head”. I’ve heard it a million times. Everyone who uses this specific excuse always ends up being exposed as taking WAYYY too many. Very classic line for opiate addicts.

How very interesting that only actions by people in the US affected her reputation and income! Imagine her lawyers arguing that Oz, Wonder, and Felix destroyed her career as a “documentarian” and then Oz’s lawyer pulls up the HBomb video 😂

On the memory thing: your memory of events while on narcotics can be the same as when you're drunk. Not gone, but fuzzy.

The mad caster is the GOAT. ❤

If the medication memory situation was real, why wasn’t it mentioned EVER before by her. I know you could ironically say it’s because “she has a bad memory” 😂. But seriously, to conveniently remember that you had a bad memory in that moment a long time ago… how would you remember you had a bad memory back then if you still have a bad memory problem to date? It’s just messy and not apart of what your going to court for tbh. She’s just finding a way to get out of it in my opinion.

THANK YOU for not making people who NEED opioids for chronic pain out to be addicts. I face that sort of treatment from healthcare professionals all the time as a disabled woman and it gave me a MASSIVE insight into the dehumanization people with ACTUAL substance abuse issues face. Thank you so much. I don’t WANT to be on pills, I just want to LIVE! And in the debilitating pain I can get in, it makes me suicidal. I’d actually tried to end it six times before any doctor took me serious enough about my pain to treat it.

Wonder mentioned in his video that the stuff Blair was pulling with the car were also done by Oz and Wonder had been very angry with Oz as well. IIRC at the end of his video he shows the discord call where they made up so, uh, that’s not a lot if time to ‘plot her downfall’. Really curious what her income was from March-May last year because that’s when this all started and she DROPPED HER VIDEO that everything going on is a response to. The sound clip she wanted Felix to find was for that same video so she could try to defame him harder after the pfd file supporter accusations. Can’t wait to see the judge’s ruling, this is all beyond absurd.

Did she think she was attending Judge Judy? It's about the company, not her personal life. Her lawyers are doing a terrible job.

I fully believe that she doesnt have a legal team and writes those herself. I refuse to believe that a lawer writes those letters with so little evidence as to defamation or any other claims. Edit: The further I get into this the more I am convinced she wrote those herself. There is so much incoherent, seemingly unrelated details in there. It almost feels these documents are trying to fit in as many sideblows in as possible.

The income thing is impossible to correlate. Right before all the drama happened I had stopped watching her because she was shilling the whole Scottish Lord scandal. For someone who claimed to rebut scams, she was actively repping one. That killed it for me.

I have an acquaintance who very much has memory problems when taking opiates for pain. Entire trips to fast food restaurants gone. Car rides, gone. That movie, never watched it. Etc. By this point it is a meme in the friend circle, to take care of them, and not take anything seriously, because they won't remember any claims or promises. That said, afaik this level of memory loss is uncommon.

Still blaming all but herself. Typical.

All Blair is doing is ensuring the court will never take any of her lawsuit attempts seriously again. With how very unprofessional she's being about this.

Yes I wear sunglasses and like you have prescription and normal ones, I suffer from bright lights and sunny daze big time, always have, even have to wear them in supermarkets cos their lights are too bright for me, can bring on seizures too so I have to be careful. xx

What if her painkillers are what made her a psychopath in the first place? /j

Illuminaughti or BLAIR is just bitter because her career is ruined for being a terrible person. I just wish for peace not only for Oz Media, but for Cruel World Happy Mind (big fan of her channel), LegalEagle, and other people I forgot to mention. I'm truly sorry to them. Thanks for continuing these Illuminaughti updates

As someone who has been on strong opiates tons of times, the only memory gaps you get are from you half falling asleep. It's often very obvious to others when it's happening because it usually causes head drooping as well.

I’m a paralegal and I’d like to know what lawyer she using bc wtf is happening 😭

I live in Arizona... Sunglasses are a must have accessory whenever I need to go outside lol

Here in the States, when going home after surgery, you’re most likely to get either Lortab (hydrocodone) or Tramadol for pain management. I’ve had multiple surgeries, from quick outpatient surgeries to long, invasive surgeries that kept me in the hospital for a long time. The only time I had memory issues after being home was when I had spine surgery. But it was mostly my short-term/working memory that was affected, not my long term memory. The only long-term memory that I can remember being affected was for a couple of days after getting home from my spine surgery. And I’m fairly certain that that was caused by a combination of sleeping so much and being in constant horrible pain more so than the meds.

Opioids have very little effect on memory unless you are like crazy sedated and hardly lucid. Even then the likehood of forgetting an entire conversation is low. It just doesn't have a mechanism on memory like that whereas something like benzodiazapines have a very clear mechanism for memory deletion.

For anyone curious, the VTuber model is actually old, it was something she did on her second or third channel about a year or two ago for a few videos, I only saw it on two but she might’ve also used it for streaming or something else.

4:46 I can tell you from my Sisters both having to take very strong painkillers, Morphine Based, that Memory loss can be an issue with Higher doses... However, And it is my youngest sister I have to thank for this knowledge - NO RESPOSIBLE PRACTITIONER woudl ever administer such a high strength as it woudl have serious adverse effects... Lets bear in mind that Morphine Based Painkillers are some of the strongest you can be prescribed... And due to complications that my Youngest Sister was already having - She Abused her Morphine... Which caused her to have serious health issues ... I cannot give all the nitty gritty, but a Catalogue of NHS errors meant she went without early treatment for almost 20 years... So an issue that could have been resolved wasn't, causing her more pain to which she took far more Morphine than she was supposed to... This in turn made her health worse and yes she did suffer memory issues! Based on experience therefore... I have questions as to what pain killers she was taking and if she was given a higher than normal dosage. I should also bear in mind that being from teh UK, we have far heavier restrictions on what Pain Killers our hospitals are allowed to use... I am sure we have all seen teh Dentist Patients from the USA who are in a Fantasy World, You dont get that here in the UK as those drugs are BANNED! So, It is possible but I have heavy doubts.... Surely she should have been able to mention teh Medication she was taking at that time... It woudl be a matter of record!

i was on heavyduty painkillers after wisdom teeth removal and didn't have any worse of a memory than i already do. something that significant would be a little difficult to just forget about

Her lack of actual quotes on the parts that could be defamation is not good for her case.

The general misunderstanding that civil cases are decided on a preponderance of evidence is evident here. You still must present evidence that isn't "because I said so".

I wear sunglasses a lot because the light is too loud.