Good for you Stan. Glad you got to do that. The 350 has been one of my favorite planes to ever fly. Thank you for watching.

Did he have ya' read checklist items for him perchance while you were in the 'front office'...

@@rudyho3790 Nope. I just sat there like a kid in a candy shop staring at all the cool gauges and buttons.

Glad you enjoyed!

José Oswaldo Pedrosa well said!

Well said. That was nice flying .

Dave OBrien thank you!

Hands down the best! Thank you

That's why is named King Air :)

docbrad262 Thank You. I'm still in the learning stages but a lot of fun.

Thank you

CMallory fun and great airplane to fly!

CMallory ;!77

Thank you

FortWorth Rising it depends on the terrain but on flat taxiways I usually control the taxi speed with the prop lever.

merc340sr yes doesn't take long. Very powerful airplane.

Soooo....why not use an earlier turnoff (after first two) to shorten taxi and get that quick takeoff?🤔

@@rudyho3790because you always want to use as much of the runway as you can in case of an engine failure during the take off roll etc.

yeh...pt6, garrett mills..very reliable ...very rare fails any flight mode...(sans pilot op errors)😎👍

Thank you for watching. Glad you enjoyed it.

Only matters for reverse reaction time and generator load on the ground

And reverse reaction time doesn’t matter because you’re not going into any place you can’t get out of with balanced field performance (typically about 3000+ feet vs 1500 to land) and carrying the extra thrust from high idle eliminates any advantage.

You can get a single pilot type.

They are all single pilot airplanes. Most are operated two crew for legal (depending on the type of operation), contract, or insurance purposes.

gerdelt I really have no idea. I’m very much a amateur at this. For some reason it never happens on the other plane I’m flying with a pro line 21.

@@8704031462 The shutter speed of the video camera gets longer to account for the loss of sunlight shining into the cabin, and you start seeing the screens flicker mid-refresh

It’s the refresh rate of the camera and instruments

Models in the 1990’s are around 1.5 million. New models run about 5.4 million.

Chuck Kirkpatrick yep!

No

Maybe he was taxiing in flight idle. I never saw him move the condition levers.

It's normal to take off with the condition at low idle. You'd only use high idle on a really short runway.

High idle is only used for generator assisted or cross gen starts for most operations. Everything else is low idle. All it is is a movable low stop that makes the FCU input a bit higher, making N1 70% instead of 62%. Moving the power levers so N1 is 70% accomplishes the same thing.. and it changes nothing in how the engine operates at the high end. And if you have an input shaft failure it goes to a default 85% N1 regardless of condition lever (except cutoff) or power level position. High idle does make reverse more responsive on landing because the N1 doesn’t have to spool up as much, but it’s offset by carrying more thrust after you’ve gone to flight idle but before you’ve touched down. Honestly with the 350 bound by balanced fields and net takeoff flight path because of its certification and it’s very short landing distances even without reverse (even on glare ice.. we are only limited by crosswinds, not length), you’re not going into places where you really need reverse. Doing a “shot of reverse” where you reverse the prop blades and let the props spool down before N1 spools up again gives you a huge amount of stopping power at which point you can switch to brakes. Reverse is mostly a get out of jail free card or something to impress your friends with at the expense of your props. A plane like a Convair 580 or an MU-2 with a fixed shaft engine.. yeah you have to go to high idle. Not the PT6.

No not at all. You can get a single pilot exemption where your license will say strictly say yes be-300. If you work for a fractional company and require a sic, your license will say sic required.

Yes, being single pilot on that airplane, I kept them on the power levers at all times. in a crewed environment I would not operate that way.

@John Smith many thanks!

@John Smith the pilot in the video increased power to the left engine, so not just brakes.

Yalnız Oyuncu not as many as a jet but more than a typical family car

I presume you leave your 'hanger' in the wardrobe?

@@RA76951P, Why don't you do this jerk. I know you back out. All cowards with a big mouth do. Get a second on your house, if you own one, get all the money you can, tell your friends, after all, they know you and will back you. It has to be in cash. We get an attorney to hold the money for a small fee, and I match it and I proof everything I said. Uneducated lowlifes like you will always have something to say but never back it up.

Hahahaha. this is a funny rant by Captain Yackity shmack! got his feeling hurt and panties in a wod! What a chic!

@@CaptainArt777 what's it like having such a small dick?

Malamute Aerospace this happens to be the best plane. This particular company flew shorter legs with higher pax loads and flew into shorter runways that a jet couldn’t do.

@@8704031462 if they ever look at jet maybe they'll look at Pilatus pc24

Sovereign? Well... not really. A Sovereign would be expensive to buy, expensive to operate, not significantly faster at many of the stage lengths I fly, cumbersome for what I carry, and simply unable to operate out of many of the airports I fly. I’d choose an Excel or XLS waaaay before a Sovereign. PC-24 is more like it.