Very well said

Ban tiktok?

People used to say the same thing about Instagram. It's annoying and has been around as long as the internet has. There's really no excuse :/

@@ascherlafayette8572Yes, and ban Detroit aswell

Fellow Michiganian?

But if he can use the system to his benefit, the revenue is his

Watermarks don't do crap either, actually. I've seen dozens of TikToks with watermarks that don't belong to the poster. People literally steal watermarked content, and TikTok viewers don't care about who the original creator is.

Imitation is the greatest form of flattery I guess

Not surprised someone with a flag pfp looks for the silver lining, it’s just a weird character trait i associate with flag pfps

@@Kenya_Berry Thanks for the compliment. I thought Nationalism was a more trait with flag pfp.

ROMÂNIAAAAAAAAA🇷🇴🇷🇴🇷🇴🇷🇴🇷🇴🇷🇴🇷🇴‼‼‼‼‼‼‼‼

@@lonesome3958 except this isnt even imitation, its impersonation.

So true

Yes, they’re both scummy people. Both stealing content from other people

He ended up just putting robo-fish in it, not real fish

State laws, most likely. But it's also really iffy. For example, you can't do that on the beach when it's turtle bb migration time, because they follow the moon and lights derail them. But the states each have entirely different ecosystems to one another because the country is so large, so it makes no sense for federal laws to dictate something like fishing methods.

So you also despise this guy?

@@RealFaodail who you talking about the guy in the video that stole content or avnj? because if you're talking about avnj there's a difference between reaction youtubers and content thieves when you react to something you don't claim it as yours.

@@paitynrich8607 Yes there is a difference. One person claims it’s their video, and profits off it for almost zero effort. While the other watches a KZfaq video, taking all the value out the original video, then profiting off of the work of the original poster. For almost no effort. Very similar, both absolutely scummy

@@RealFaodail I see your point but I do think just stealing and reposting the content is worse but that's your opinion my opinion is reaction KZfaqrs don't mean it in a harmful way but the people who just completely steal content do at the end of the day I'm just a simple person who likes to watch videos

@@paitynrich8607 I genuinely respect your perspectives and opinions. In my initial response, I realize that I came across as overly aggressive, and for that, I apologize. In my opinion, reaction content on KZfaq can be seen as akin to uploading someone else’s video. Uploading a stolen video is detrimental to everyone involved, except for the person who posted it, and it requires no effort on their part. I wholeheartedly agree that this is an unfavorable practice. However, when it comes to reaction content, there are certain similarities that cannot be ignored. The original creators, often referred to as Reacties, invest hours upon hours of hard work, creativity, and skill into crafting a single video before uploading it. They carefully plan, script, shoot, and edit their content to offer something unique and engaging to their audience. On the other hand, reactors spend a comparatively short amount of time, typically around 20 minutes, watching the video and providing their reactions or commentary. They might spend a few additional minutes creating a thumbnail, but the overall effort they put in is considerably less than that of the original creator. This discrepancy raises concerns about the fairness and value derived from reaction content. By creating reaction videos, reactors essentially extract the essence of the original content, often incorporating it into their own video. As a result, the original content loses some of its appeal, as viewers may feel they have already experienced it through the reaction video. This can diminish the motivation for viewers to seek out and support the original creator’s work. Essentially, reactors obtain content that has been crafted over weeks of work, pouring their time, creativity, and expertise into it, and they distill it into a shorter, less comprehensive format within a matter of minutes. This disparity in effort and value raises questions about the ethics and impact of reaction content on KZfaq. I also hear the argument that reaction content provides exposure to the original poster. However, I find this claim to be largely false. The audience that reactors attract is often distinct from the audience the original creator intended to reach. As a result, a vast majority, roughly 98%, of the viewers who watch a reaction video do not feel compelled to explore the original creator’s channel. Even among the remaining 2% who might click through to the original video, their engagement tends to be brief. They might watch for a few minutes, and then click off. Unfortunately, this behavior can send negative signals to the KZfaq algorithm, which interprets quick clicks and short viewing durations as indicators of poor content quality. Consequently, the algorithm may perceive the original video as unappealing and reduce its visibility, limiting its potential to reach a wider audience. In essence, the argument that reaction content provides exposure to the original poster is flawed. The reality is that the vast majority of viewers watching a reaction video are unlikely to explore the original creator’s content, and the small percentage who do may not engage for long enough to positively impact the video’s performance or visibility. Therefore, the claim that reaction content is beneficial for the original creator in terms of exposure is, unfortunately, largely unfounded. You do you, man. I understand that you’re just trying to enjoy some KZfaq content, and that’s cool. However, I can’t help but feel frustrated. It’s important to acknowledge that not all reactors may be aware of how reaction content negatively affects everyone involved. Nevertheless, the impact remains the same. Even if unintentionally, reactors contribute to a cycle that diminishes the value and recognition of original content creators. Ideally, it would be great if more reactors realized the adverse effects of their content and shifted towards creating more original and unique content. By doing so, they could contribute positively to the creative ecosystem on KZfaq and give deserving creators the attention and support they deserve. So, while I respect everyone’s individual choices and preferences, I hope that this person, and others like them, will come to recognize the downsides of reaction content and consider posting more original content in the future. It would be beneficial for both creators and viewers alike.

Yes

I mean is he gonna sue himself? He literally just stole peoples content 30 seconds after crying about others doing it to him. lmaoo

NIEEE POLSKA

(real)

(Not clickbait, *scary* *i cried* gone wrong )

*gone sexual*

Stern?