"The judges only scored this save a 8/10, so the call on the ice stands: we have a goal."

I mean the offside goal that Carolina scored against Columbus in 2021 comes to mind that they don't care about the rules all that much. It was a miscommunication and Carolina shouldn't have been awarded the goal, but "to make it right," they killed the last 45s of a penalty kill for Columbus (which was unprecedented). Columbus lost 6-5 thanks to that massive error.

It honestly wouldn’t be that hard to make a rule that says “if it enters the glove before it enters the net, and the goaltender doesn’t drop it afterwards, then the goalie had control and play is dead, so no goal.” Problem is that the ref’s whistle is no longer prime in this situation, which would make it a pretty unique exemption, and lend credence to different complaints of “… Oh, but the ref should have blown their whistle already.” Would probably also want to say that the goalie can’t move their glove into the net purposely, but that could be hard to judge.

You could say he was... quick about it.

i have a sneaking suspicion he might be inducted into steves paddle save emporium next week

A dang-it turned hat-pick so Quick

@@jonokiller "That's a dang-it ... but not for me!"

Last season was my first season and I learned a lot this way as well.

@@LisaMarieFord my biggest pet peeve when getting into watching hockey (especially as a girl, it’s not uncommon for people to jump straight to the “oh right you’re just a girl obviously you wouldn’t know) is when people wouldn’t explain and just said “how could you not understand it?” but when hockey fans actually explain things that truly don’t make sense to an outsider, it felt so nice to feel like i knew what was going on and by another fan

@@Emma-lb2mu In my two years of learning all the rules, reading the regulations, searching for terms, watching videos like this, and watching Penguins and Leafs games (mostly) I learned a lot. I’ve never been to a real game. Unfortunately I too learned there’s a lot of trolling of girls who like hockey and who play hockey. On NHL posts people get downright mean, to put it VERY lightly, about videos of young girls playing. I’m a grown woman and deal, but geesh the jerks that attempt to launch absolutely terrible comments to insult not only my intelligence and looks, but about my very existence in this life is just astounding. 😳 I learned long ago to not let those things harm me, but the stuff some say about kids isn’t right and could be very harmful at those impressionable ages. I say this so you can be aware of them and use block if you must, but don’t let troll deter you as there are a lot of great folks in person and even online who like to talk and have no problems answering questions. I enjoy getting into discussions with folks, especially those who don’t mind explaining things. 😏 Admittedly, I also take some joy in “correcting” trolls who flings insults with stating the rules that they had wrong. I don’t know which team(s) you follow but listening to Penguins games on the radio with Josh Getzoff calling the plays VERY well and Phil Bourque offering commentary has been extremely helpful. The Ol 29-er was very helpful in answering questions on there at times too. I haven’t heard plays called as well on TV or other radio broadcasts yet.

@@LisaMarieFord i totally agree. even my brother liked to bug me about it and would often say things like “you only like hockey for the guys” and whatnot, and another guy told me i was a bandwagon fan because i started watching during the playoffs. i did start paying attention to hockey in the playoffs (i’m an oilers fan), but my team went pretty far and it made me want to be a fan even more because it was so interesting and so exciting. i love seeing stats of other teams, random records that players keep breaking, and all the confusing things about hockey. it’s so entertaining and i’ve made so many friends through loving hockey. also, if you ever get the chance to go to a game, it’s such a cool experience. going to a game after watching it on tv for so long is really cool to see the players in real time and almost remind you that they’re real humans and they’re actually doing that in real life. it’s really interesting, but once you start it’s hard to stop, i’ve spent so much money on tickets…. hahaha. i love listening to jack michaels commentate the oilers games. he’s so into it and gets so hyped up it keeps me in the loop the entire time and i find him and louie debrusk are really good at going over random things that happen as the game goes on.

Even the refs don't understand the rules so don't worry haha.

Last night’s goals 1) Georgie giveaway 2) Sammy G not remembering defensive fundamentals 3) Makar hesitating 4) Empty netter is empty netter.

@@SRTifiable cope harder aves fans

Don’t worry, Georgie will get in next week!

@@poopmcgee2410 Who hurt you? Are you a Wild fan? Are you sad that you never do anything in the post season? 😢😥😥🤣🤣🤣 Edit: Trolls are my favorite 😂

@@SRTifiable jeez dude, relax and do something productive in your free time...

Markstrom sure isn't watching.

What makes you think they aren't? We know Brad Marchand does, lol

Oh I watched that in real time. That was a DOOZY.

In a game they lost in overtime, no less 😬

Wait, there are Caps fans who love Mantha?

@@VeggieTart Lol right? That's so surprising to me.

This has to be Manthas youtube account, never seen anyone with a positive opinion regarding Matha amongst cap fans

The exact reason why Steve Yzerman traded Martha right away. His compete is so low. One of the laziest players in the league

Mantha has the talent to be a great player. His biggest problem is he’s just super lazy. On his turnover, he was being lazy with the puck, and then when he did turn it over, you can see him just floating in the neutral zone, not trying to get back. He did this stuff all the time as a red wing, and it made me so angry watching him do it.

Thank you for being the comment I was looking for

@@camim7467 lmao short attention span gang

We still haven't paid enough of our dues for that man's menacing violence toward NHL goalies everywhere inside the crease. A mighty hefty tax to be sure.

When a picture of Homer attending a game in Sweden made the rounds on Twitter last year, dozens of the replies wanted to know if he was assessed a penalty in the stands

*TOLVANEN:* Hey! I'm not on your team anymore, but thanks for the puck, Juuse!

i believe they think ned swung his leg back on his own, possibly in motion before zucker pushed him further

To me, it looks like he's kicking out, but the stick going *under* the pad makes it slip a little further than he intended. Doesn't look like a push, and I can see why the goal would stand since it's very difficult to tell what caused his foot to go back across the goal line.

You can never prove that the puck was going in otherwise. You can prove, however, that before the puck went in Zucker's stick made netward contact with Ned's leg. I was at this game live myself, and I was bereft when Lalonde challenged the call because I didn't see any reason to, but when I got home and saw all the different camera angles it's crystal clear that by the precedent the NHL has been setting this should have been reversed. I'll take my solace in the final score at least :b

As a flames fan I think a case can be made both ways but I think they made the right call. They still took the empty netter that we scored because it was “offside” so I don’t really think anyone was trying to gift the flames anything. But you are a Kings fan who is entitled to their own opinion.