For Reals!!!

As long as you don't have to form proper sentences, or use the correct words, you will probably do alright.

@@loganpelletier 😮😧🤫😊

And a neck brace.

@@aguyandhiscomputer why?

Defendant looks like he spends his time on the computer complaining about libs while eating doritos all day.

Yet why agree to anything if he is trying to put it on his brother? I'd understand if he was actually telling the guy to go after his brother but he is not he is somewhat agreeing to fix the fence.

Except, the defendant didn't cause the damage.

​@@DavidJohnson-ep8wd What a stupid comment.....

@@SilverSergeant So he says

That would only work if the brother was a guest and did not simply visit the property for whatever reason. Just because he is the brother of the renter does not mean he is always welcomed at the brothers home meaning he isn't a guest, and unless the brother invited him he isn't a guest

That would only hold up if it was a signed rental agreement saying that the renters is responsible for his/her guest. If my brother kills a man I wasn't there and had no clue it happened, can or should I be allowed or ordered to serve part or all of his time? I think not

She might have! But that’s why I love judge milian over judge Judy! She knows the law and follows the law of the state.

I’m surprised the judge let him talk that long. Lol

@@graduatge105 she looked like she'd rather be anywhere else while he was yammering on 🤣🤣

Some people get really emotionally attached to their fences. Clinically it's call fencefantasia. Although it can take up to 2 years therapy is the best treatment.

I almost thought he was a lawyer until the judge asked him lol. CEO makes sense I guess lol

@@Channel-JJ Lmbo

Well 😢 its over now her new show is just acting fake cases

🤣

I felt like it was a king case as well

😅😅

Same lol

That will come back to bite him since the judge ordered him to provide contact info😂

I do

There was a brother. The defendant even states that the plaintiffs brother came to his house and they talked about him hitting the fence, and the brother told the plaintiff he would pay for the repair.

Obviously there was someone else. That person went and talked to the plaintiff. 🤦‍♀️

never ever tell somebody that u will pay anything for any damages . defendant would have not had to pay anything if he didnt say he would help pay. especially if the damage is cause by a person who hardly ever even contacts u to see if u are dead or alive . his own brother caused him to have to pay money to his neighbor .

I wonder if he was nervous or possibly autistic, he couldn’t make eye contact. No shade, just curiosity

never ever tell somebody that u will pay anything for any damages . defendant would have not had to pay anything if he didnt say he would help pay. especially if the damage is cause by a person who hardly ever even contacts u to see if u are dead or alive . his own brother caused him to have to pay money to his neighbor .

The defendant wasn’t responsible for the damage, his brother was. But he had told the plaintiff that he would take care of it.

But was he a guest? The defendant wasn't home at the time and it didn't seem like he had given him permission to be there, either way we never got to know. The grandfather might have.

No it’s the grandfathers home . The defendant was not even in town . His brother was visiting the grandfather , and he hit the fence . If anything sue the grandfather and the brother .

Wrong. The homeowner is responsible. I'm glad the defendant won. The plaintiff seems like a bit of a jerk.

@@layahYasharahla the grandfather was also on the lawsuit though.

Not always.......If the defendant was not there, he is not liable....end of story.

It was built by Slats R Us their Pristine design line A41X and it was in Better Homes & Fences magazine 2 years running.

@@Channel-JJ you everywhere. Lol. It’s not a day I don’t say your name in the comments

@@ebonecoley2985 It's not always me. My cat and parrot figured out my password. They like to sign in and make comments more so these days because they're both on ankle monitors and can't leave the house. They got caught ride'n dirty.

@@Channel-JJ I’m ctfu

@@ebonecoley2985 I was thinking the same thing a few days ago ! Then when you click on his name he has over 1k comments on this channel smh, somebody has a LOT of time on their hands lol

Ironic of you to say considering that analogy makes zero sense 😂

@@ZovaBe OK.

All the is from someone with no picture. I’m sure you look horrible!

bright bunny? the only bright bunnies I know are near Chernobyl.

@@Channel-JJ "Bright" as in smart or quick to learn, which you are obviously not. Good luck with your life

That’s not really relevant on the same lol. When you have guests at your house and they damage your neighbours property it’s on you. You then can sue your brother for the damages you paid because of him.

@@robjk8876 the “guest” wasn’t invited and no one was home. He shows up when he wants.

@@kassipenrod1737 still, it was his brother and his equipment that broke the fence. He can say the brother wasn’t invite but don’t know that for sure sometimes people don’t tell the truth.

Also during covid. We just ended up doing a cheap repair cause it was going to be expensive. It worked out since the part of fence that needed fixing was seen or used by anyone so we can just do a cover up job lol

Her decision hinged on the legal theory of Detrimental Reliance. The fact that the defendant committed himself to helping financially, coupled with the fact that the plaintiff “relied” upon that verbal commitment, to his own potential detriment, is why the defendant was ordered to pay. Had the defendant *not* made such a commitment, the plaintiff could very-well have decided not to go through with the repair, and would therefore not be out of the money that he felt the defendant owed.

@@NubianP6 Great explanation! You made it so easy to understand, thank you!

He gives me lawyer vibes. He’s definitely adding fluff.

@@charkitahood2532 exactly! We kicked dude off our property! Not John’s! There is so much more to this than they shared but it’s solely because John didn’t like Keenan. He’s old and Keenan is young and a smart ass lmao

He was repeating what someone said though lol

@@AP-xw5px lol

It's based on a legal concept/remedy called Estoppel. For Estoppel to be successful you have to prove that they relied on the promise (e.g take action such as building the fence), not all people will take action based on a promise, I think that is the disinction.

@Imani Powell I'm sorry. I have ocd. Words associations, right angles.... *You're * giving me my rent money. Sorry sorry had to else it rolls around in my head til I correct it. And yep that is why my friends just LOVE ME. LOL

Contradictory in the sense...

Again I'm sorry.

LOL

Omg, yes!! 😆

Damn ladies, I came here for a certain comment ( 😉 ) and I’m to early. Lol.

@@Kat-bu3bn Since this is two men, look out for the Milian is so and so. Lol

lol

He’s an entitled jack ass! Keenan does anything for anyone! He just didn’t like Keenan so he tried searching for a reason to sue!

Lmbo

Same thought

2x speed and it’s still slow 😅

thanks and to answer your question, if you continue to repeat it then it is.

Good thing thats not how the law works. Could u imagine being responsible for any mistake one of your guests made

The defendant repeatedly represented himself as the property owner. It wasn't until the suit was filed that it was revealed that his grandfather actually owned the property.

@@anytimefitness5348 there are many reasons as to why that was said! Stop acting like you know everything.

@@kassipenrod1737 One thing I know for sure is that the defendant was the most disrespectful neighbor ever. He's built himself quite the reputation in the neighborhood.

The ruling was for the plaintiff. So the plaintiff actually won.

@@anytimefitness5348 the defendant agreed to pay so he has no issue paying the jerk. He has to get the bulk from the brother so🤷🏽‍♀️😆🙂

@@mrshappilymarried1 Well, I am that jerk, so I would know ;-)

Actually your wrong. The plaintiff does get to pick the contractor, as long as it’s a reasonable estimate. It’s actually the law. Think about it, would you want the person thats already damaged your property be allowed to pick the cheapest contractor they could get and get screwed twice? Hell no, you wouldn’t stand for it and neither would I.

@@anytimefitness5348 may as well add a liar to the list as well!

You live next to a crazy, jerk neighbor for a year and see how it affects your stability! 😂

@@anytimefitness5348 dude no one here even talked to you! Why tf are you still so pressed?

No person has the right to determine who works on my house or any other property that i own.

Well what if he didn't invite that guest...

The guest wasn’t invited. No one was home

That was probably a materials quote, not the labor costs. With labor it’s probably going to be about the same cost, give or take

@@feyfantome it’s a friend and he does it for a living. It’s someone we help a lot so he was going to help us. This whole this is funny to me!

@@feyfantome oh and our friend is a well known person in our town who fixes everything!!

Accept that's not how the law works. If someone hits your car, you can't take it to the best mechanic in the state and have a $40 dollar fix get ballooned up to $500 because that's what the mechanic charged. The plantiff can come to court saying "I have this quote", and the defendant can also come in with another quote to show that the plantiff is being unreasonable. There's literally hundreds of cases on this show about this very thing. There's a reason why you're not a lawyer, and it's entirely because you don't know anything about the law and instead use your bias emotions. Maybe study the law for a few years before you decide what's legal and what's not.

@@Fribee83 you sound very condescending. I'm guessing you're a lawyer. Lol

@@kittyb275 No, Adrian is just infamous for finding every excuse in the book for saying the judge is wrong.At one case, he literally said the judge was wrong because she got too emotional to a guy and should be fired for disrespecting a man like that.

@@Fribee83 , You don't know chit about American laws. Adrian is correct. The plaintiff chooses who repairs his property, not some loser from Australia . Did you send Mr Adrian an invite to your 13th birthday party Tommy? lmbao 🎈 🎈 🎉 🎉 🥳 🎂

Paired with the mouth breathing

Lmao that’s honestly the furthest thing from the truth! He won’t even take a Tylenol. He was just tired because he works his ass off!

I always thought that if one neighbor put up the fence it didn’t necessarily mean the other neighbor had to pay. What if they didn’t want a fence, or care? I mean of course be a good neighbor and freaking pay half!! I just didn’t think they legally had to? Pls let me know!

@@Kat-bu3bn We share fences and unless the neighbor damaged it, both parties have to share the cost. Just went through this last year when the wind knocked out one side of our fence.

When the fence was built, if one neighbor paid for it entirely, then he had to build the fence within his own property. The guy who built it owns it 100% even though the other neighbor gets the benefit of it. If the neighbors originally shared the cost of the fence, it can be built on the property line and they co-own it.

@@ButtonsCasey that's where you made your mistake. You should have sued the wind on TPC. Even if you lost it would be fun to watch the Judge yelling into the wind.

@@Channel-JJ LMAO. We did file an insurance claim but they denied it.

The brother wasn’t at the house for grandpa.

Me too. It doesn’t work that way with a car and it wouldn’t work that way with a fence either. I can only assume it’s because he didn’t actually hit the fence that she decided the way she did 🤷🏻‍♂️

"Detrimental reliance"

exactly. But he was so persistent going after the defendant.