That is amazing memory man!!!

good attitude , I grew up on Connery but each Actor who plays Him is played so for its generation .Though I skipped the entire Moore years and didn't go to the theater to see Bond again till Dalton took over, Moore's films had some beautiful girls though

+djsonicc Agreed, I think it usually stems down to the Bond that one first sees and grows up on. The first Bond film I saw, I believe, was Goldfinger. And I subsequently saw the other Sean Connery films and then some of the Roger Moore Films and then Goldeneye. So when I was a child I didn't know there were other actors besides those three. At that time it was ranked Connery, Moore, Brosnan. When I look back on it now, Sean Connery is still at the top for me (probably sentimental reasons), then Brosnan, but now it has developed into a tie for third with Timothy Dalton and Daniel Craig (as they are the more mature Bonds), then it is Roger Moore due to his campness and self-parody, then George Lazenby because I feel like he didn't have enough time to explore his Bond enough and I am not totally hooked (but then again, maybe with a script revision, it could have been better).

Brosnan's Bond is great but Daniel Craig made Bond more human. Sam Mendes did great job as well. Team work.

What does that make George Lazenby then?

I’m born in the Craig era, but the first bond I saw was from russia with love, so Connery ended up being the one that marked me the most.

😂😂

💀💀💀

OMG that is supernatural🤣🤣

For some reason I struggle to think he'd have anyone next to him haha. Definitely in his own little cabin in first class!

gag worthly.

Connery was still the perfect Bond but Brosnan was pretty close.

+Avoozl got a point. gotta respect the orginal. Daniel is too serious ton be Bond

+Avoozl Connery was the original (although a little stiff), but Brosnan was really too "nice" to really give Bond the macho appeal he requires. In my opinion, Daniel Craig was the best of all, combining his superior acting skills with brutal physicality, the best of both worlds.

+tiffsaver Craig was the dullest Bond who focused far too much on the tough guy side, he's no way the best of both worlds, Connery was perfectly well balanced and closer to the novels. Craig had the suaveness and wit of a brick and was more like a common thug than a 00 agent.

+Alejandro Sanchez The wit, the smoothness and sarcasm. A sort of modern and better version of Roger Moore. That's why he's number one 007 to me. Followed by Moore.

92JMFL You're telling me - when I saw the thumbnail, for a moment I thought it was Ronald Reagan.

I disagree. Pierce looks really good for a man in his 60's, so give him a break!

no hassle Nobody's accusing Pierce Brosnan of looking ugly, lol.

redlightmax Oh, yeah, well you already have saying he looked like Ronald Reagan. Ronald was a wrinkled old prune, Pierce isn't.

no hassle Reagan was old and wrinkled, sure, but I wasn't implying that Reagan was ugly. Now I might have to stop before this conversation gets into homoerotic territory.

He could definitely do a classic retired Bond movie, that would be such a cool idea I reckon.

The Man with the Red Tattoo - should've been Pierce Brosnan's swan song/Bondverse film 40th anniversary special instead of Die Another Day

Want to like but it’s perfect considering your name

They're all polite because they're English...

One can immediately tell when an actor is a cinephile and genuinely enjoys watching movies and studies them. Timothy Dalton also gives great analysis about the Bond movies.

@@evertrainproductions1995 We don't deserve Timothy Dalton!

Goldeneye was great but whoever was writing after that just got so damn silly

@@AntiGenZandY The World is Not Enough is underrated

too feminine and prissy.

+tiffsaver Yeah he's great in that film

+Hugh G Wrection I loved 'Matador' so much that I bought the DVD and showed it to all my friends. Spread the word!!

Its old now and largely forgotten amongst other movies, but matador was really fantastic.

Pierce Brosnan is a great actor, wonderful human being, and great man. Recently, I watched The Matador and it is such a joy to watch him in unusual roles. Awesome talent! He will always be my favorite Bond after Sean Connery. I have been a fan of his work.

too prissy and feminine.

Crying emo.

If die another Day was a bit like Skyfall and stealing from the future you know then it will be good .

But Rogers gone :(

Attack it's weak point. . . *FOR MASSIVE DAMAGE*

And now Connery is gone

Even George Lazenby...? Hmm 🤔

it's right about the Borne movies it totally changed the Bond franchise, everything that you see on Craig 's performance it's almost identical of what Matt Damon did as Jason Bourne , they pretty much took that movie as a reference to shape on Craig's Bond

jeffrey dahmere I've finished watching all the Bond movies and the new Bond is nothing like Bourne at all.

So....... Roger Moore also talked about The Bourne Identity as well? The one that stared Matt Damon?

He realized that EON had to adapt to the times, and going back to basics was a necessary step. It was hard noting that Brosnan's films made a lot of money and that Brosnan was a great Bond for the time he played 007, but times change, and so must the Bond franchise.

TheGore1021 you must be blind , James Bond is all Bourne, now like Bourne is like a robot like Craig's Bond no personality no humor just kill with His hands , Brosnan was the only Bond that used an automatic rifle the most He servred the 90's well . Because of Bourne the writing was in the wall for Brosnan , younger Actor who fights hand to hand , Can only tell with SPECTRE if Bond will go past Bourne with better action .And they are making a new Bourne film with Damon again, but Bourne is the past so lets hope Bond moves on .

rollercoaster478 Except Lazenby.

no hassle Does Lazenby dislike Craig or just hasnt voiced his opinion?

rollercoaster478 He said at a convention that he was not keen on the brutal style of the modern 007 films. I don't think he was taking a direct dig at Craig, but he isn't too keen on the direction they have gone with the character.

Craig destroyed the series,he is just an steroid built clown

Fernando Miranda How can you say he destroyed the series? He fucking invigorated life into the series after all the invisible cars and horrible puns from the previous films. Skyfall was also the most successful of the whole series. Plus he is in good shape, and certainly not overbuilt or a steroid user. Idiot!

I completely agree. Your idea of casting Craig as 005 would make for a genius pitch of spinoff films. Cast Craig (or another action star) as a bad-ass & rougher agent 005, than the smooth womanizer of 007. The Fleming Estate & Eon Productions would love your idea.

I disagree, Daniel doesn't need to some other double 0, he's quite perfect as Bond and brings a level of believability and realism that frankly has been missing - to have Bond as a smooth womanizer is to simplify the complexity of the character that was first written in Casino Royale, what they did with Daniel's Bond in taking him back to the beginning roots and tell the journey and formation was just perfect - as much as Pierce is and always will be my personal favorite for Bond, as someone who grew up with the books as much as the films, it's Daniel whom really made me connect to the stories written in the books

***** honestly, I don't see Bond as something that needs spin off films, it would frankly ruin things, this doesn't need to follow some Hollywood spin off film universe standard that seemingly every other franchise is doing, just let Bond be about Bond and come out with a film every few years

+Mitch Dunn / Duncan O'Duinn / Korvis Korax The only thing you got right was that Pierce was good as Remington Steele. A wimpy guy who was PRETENDING to be a tough and suave guy, but was actually controlled by a woman (Stephanie Zimbalist). Daniel Craig doesn't have to PLAY tough, he IS tough. That's the difference.

Hey, Tiff. Don't forget Brosnan is an Irishman! They are blessed with good lucks and knuckle heads. Get them in a fight, be sure it's not you they are fighting - and, I'm a Brit! Take care, Bill.

Yeah I agree totally

Agreed. Brosnan was more a Roger Moore type "Bond". They had "the look". You look at them and say "That guy could play Bond". Had that gentlemanly handsome look. Daniel Craig...first time I saw him...I thought "Bond villain". He doesn't have that "suave gentlemanly" way about him. But his movies were good as they were trying to be "realistic"...like the Jason Bourne films. But they lacked the physicality of Connery and Craig WITH "the look". Also gone for many Bond films are the classic beauty of the "older" Bond women (e.g. Ursula Andress, Maude Adams, Carole Bouquet...etc.). The Italian actress in From Russia With Love who played Bond's love interest. Missing that exotic world-class beauty look. Olga Kurlenko comes close...sort of. Then there was Maria Grazia Cucinnotta...should have given her a bigger role..I think she was in Goldeneye. Sophie Morceau... Pierce really aged here. He's on the cusp of "old looking". Loosing his handsomeness. Of course it happens to us all. But Connery's aged well. OF the Bonds I've seen. Roger Moore still sort of has his good looks.

I think Brosnan could have done a Craig style Bond if he was directed to do so, but the direction they were going for during the era kind saw him as a Connery/Dalton combination.

Godzilla52 Brosnan doesn't have the physique or natural intensity to pull of that kind of tough guy. He just doesn't have credibility in that way.

hartsickdisciple I've seen him do it in Sirapham falls and the November man. He even had some pretty cold moments in The World is not enough when shot that girl dead.

But it wasn't Brosnan who wanted to leave being Bond, it was simply the fact that the director deemed him 'too old' to continue being Bond. Everything or Nothing was to be Brosnan's 5th and last Bond movie before it was canceled.

+Avoozl Hi! Yes, quite right. It just goes to show, those in charge do not always know what is best, alas.

+William Rance I think we all wish there was more brosnan bond movies

+Avoozl Wasn't "Everything or Nothing" a video game though instead of a real screenplay written for Brosnan's Bond?

Burt Maclin, FBI It was originally going to be a movie but ended up a game instead.

Skyfall was easily enjoyable, there was nothing boring about the movie.

I found Dalton as the most violent and serious James Bond plus Dalton IMO sucked dick. My order of favorite James Bond to least favorite James Bond would be Pierce Brosnan, Daniel Craig, Sean Connery, Roger Moore, George Lazenby, and Timothy Dalton. The next actor to play James Bond might be Henry Cavil since he was offered the role the same time Craig was and has interest in taking over the role when he gives up

I dont like Craig's Bond,just a copy of Jason Bourne,no charm,wit,just a muscular hitman.

Fernando Miranda If you don't like him then you don't like him we all have our own opinions. Did i think the remake nightmare on elm street was better than the original? And do i like Jackie Earle Haley's Freddy better than Robert's? Yes to both. and i think the world would better if it were back to the way it was before we destroyed everything because things are becoming a lot less natural because of us

ViDeoDuDe1928 I like both Brosnan AND Craig. Brosnan was an icier, more sexual and more detached Bond than Craig. Craig's Bond is significantly less sexually active, has more "soul", and has a back story to him. It really depends on which Bond you're in the mood for as far as I'm concerned. But having said this, I think I'd take GoldenEye over any Craig Era film.

I watched the older Bonds when I was younger. I was more of the classics kind of guy, and I still am lol. But I see what you mean MultiDannyboy89 about Craig. He does have a good backstory.