Yeap I agree. Did not see anyone else can play such stable and long rally with Djokovic during training.

It doesn’t need to be a top guy. A random guy on the tour is good enough to impress you.

He ain’t lying

@@BradleyChung D1 players are enough to impress me

lmao people are sheep that's why

Not at all!!!

mrbobevans federer

@@chasenograles2616 he has a one handed backhand. their comment was only talking about 2 handers

@@pouryavali3493 who has a better 2 handed backhand then?

Yeah, Djokovic has a wonderful backhand. Other great two-handers for me are Murray, Nalbandian, and Hewitt.

Yes. But keep in mind they are using very heavy raquets and great strings that are helping a lot too.

@@pierrelombard3631 they're looking more for control than power. the power they generate it themselves

@@benjaminsharp959 yeah but still 360g racquets with insane plow through

Agreed. Court level is far superior to overhead.

@@pierrelombard3631 its bc they practice 10000 hours bro

More like best backhand in one player Djokovic

Sonny Lim Don’t rob nalbandian of his title

just badly played, but this one is possible if the situation is given

@@systemabc3989 I know, I was just joking.

Was a good kick serve by alex

17:46

He has a good backhand for sure but I feel confident Nadal's two hander is second to Djokovic. Nadal can do way more damage with his backhand. Zverev has a powerful backhand but not much variety in it (spin, short angle). Something Nadal and Djokovic both have.

@@wcpyrojunkie3747 I would definitely agree, not to mention Wawrinka and Theim are probably really close too but Nadal’s backhand, in my opinion, is better after djokovic.

@@Adam-fg5wr Yes of course we were specifically talking about two handers.

@@wcpyrojunkie3747 sorry, didn’t see that part.

Who is "nobody"? It's pretty well accepted that he has one of the best BHs.

Lmaoo

If I had a forehand half as good I could beat everyone in the state of WA

true as god

tennis is the most simple and easy looking game and equally hard to play, thats why they say dont go by the looks. people literally think even they can do it lol and im like, ever been on court with a racquet?

​@@chloeharvey5684 Of course. Tennis is so difficult because it requires a player to be good at so many different things: hand-eye coordination, endurance, ability to change directions, speed, flexibility, and mental strength. The pros make it look easy but in reality, it's incredibly difficult. If just one thing about your technique is off on a shot, you will hit the shot out or in the net. As a recreational/club tennis player myself, I have personal experience lol.

it is his gameplan and his mentality that hides the beauty and effectiveness of his technique. He always wants to play defense from deep behind the baseline even though he has one of the best backhands in the world and a very strong forehand as well. It is not the fault of the viewers that they can't appreciate his groundstrokes when they are happening off camera at 50% power.

I just love how fluid Novak's groundstrokes are.

Check out the final of cologne 2 2020. If zverev keeps playing like that, his groundstrokes wont be unappreciated for long haha.

Lol

TRUE

Dihos good points

Dihos thing thou is that u can varying ur trajectory by getting more loop that means more brushing and hitting through the ball is a linear trajectory nothing wrong with these terms

Those are convoluted terms that do not describe the tennis stroke. Simply think of striking the ball. This is only possible by rotation and a circular swing path. "Hitting through the ball" implies a linear swing path. We are definitely capable of doing this, but it requires much more effort and less efficiency, so why would you? Linear means that you are pushing the ball, which does not give you anywhere near as much power as a circular swing. Contrary to popular "methodology" imposed by coaches, there is no linear component in the tennis stroke. By explosively using your legs/hips to thrust the torso into rotation, it forces your arms to swing freely on its own, thus naturally forming a circular swing path. "Brushing the ball" is a terrible way of explaining how spin is produced. Spin is produced by the point of impact of the ball at a point above (topspin) or below (backspin) the center of mass. Friction has less to do with it than this. On your topspin shots, you are still striking the ball, as you should be. The angle of your swing path would be dependent on the trajectory of the incoming ball. For slice however, you are simply deflecting the ball by absorbing the opponent's pace. Still, think of your typical groundstrokes (forehand, backhand) as striking the ball!

+@@HeHeMC3 Insightful! I have screenshot your messages because that's some interesting information I can relay to my coach

firstly, its the camera angle that does not allow you to see either how they hit through the ball or brush it. secondly, the advice of your coach depends on the actual student and his personal mistakes. you should not compare yourself to these top pros, they use everything, the rotation, linear momentum, and the wrist follow through to the max. so if your coach says you need to brush the ball then most likely you hit flat strokes etc so the best thing you can do is to try your best to do what the coach says and not to try to prove him wrong by watching youtubes )

Daniel Lynch maybe the same thing will happen to zverev, he will become better as he ages

how is sasha a narcissist?

@@Samir-ru4rl "I'll put myself in there"

Nain, 19:52

sir bro chill delete this comment please

watchcode they are obv not hitting it hard enough to be moaning......

hah u wish!

santosh thapa no he meant hitting a lineswoman like Djokovic

nah they're mediocre at best, the white guy in the hat plays horrible in key moments

@@hello-mv6yg yeah that guy will never win a grandslam with such horrible form

너무 잘함 ㅜ

You are gay, correct.

Well, he managed to beat Stan

High swingweights

All about the contact point and momentum

b/c they use 2 hands when they play the bayan haha