@Roa 10 points to everyone Shit including me too

Taylor Von Maxey how dare you forget the host! 10 points to the host as well.

That was an awesome comment.

i spent a few hours to answer all the questions. summary is at the end. also everyone should checkout youtube channel "whaddo you meme", hes debunks these arguments and more. 1. how long does God's anger last? answer: that's up to God, if a person repents they are forgiven, if they don't repent they go to hell forever. so his anger is forever and not forever at the same time. it depends on if the person repents and importantly God was speaking to a specific group of people. its not contradiction its lack of understanding. 2. does Yahweh tempt people? answer: God doesnt tempt but God allows people to be tempted by satan. God only test people. Abraham sacrificing his child was a test, not a tempt. 3. is a man justified by faith or works or both? answer: a man is justified by faith but faith should lead you into good works. you cannot say you have faith and do bad works then you didn't have faith. faith leads to the good works. 4. has anyone seen God or no one has seen God? answer: when people see God in the old testament they see a vessel of God, like Moses seeing God, but hes seeing a burning bush, or clouds, etc. that is not God, for God is spirit and eyes cannot see God. what they saw is a vessel of God that God spoke through to them. No man hath seen God the Father except the Son of God Jesus Christ. and even the body Jesus had was a vessel he used because he said he existed with the father before coming on earth. 5. does Yahweh delight in burnt offerings? answer: you have to obey him first. the verses are not contradicting, God is telling the people that when he brought their fathers Moses etc out of the land of Egypt he didn't tell them anything concerning burnt offering, but he told them specifically to obey him. the people didnt care about obeying God but they cared about burnt offering. if you read in context its easy to understand. 6. is God the author of evil? answer: what is evil? God would punish people in hell is that evil?. evil is relative. other translations say, God creates calamity. calamity is also like destroying people in sodom and gomorrah by fire, is that evil?. again, evil is relative. when God does something we don't call it evil although it can be a calamity. 7. was humans created before the animals? answer: Genesis 1 is giving you a day by day steps. Genesis 2 is not giving you any day by day steps, genesis 2 is giving you different stories together not step by step. the point is, God created humans and animals in one day, there's also possibility he created some animals first, then human second then other animals etc. again, its not an hour by hour to-do list, its a whole day by day what was done in the day. 8. on the road to Damascus did paul's travelling companions hear the voice that spoke to paul? answer: acts 9 : 7 is clear, they heard the voice they couldn't see who spoke. acts 22 : 9, says they didn't understand. some translations write they "heard not". the point is, they heard but they didn't understand. another meaning for "heard not" is inaudible, meaning you're hearing but you cannot get what is being said, like you're listening to another language. imagine you're speaking to a friend and he quickly speaks another language, and you ask him, hey i didn't hear what you said, basically you heard it but you didn't understand and since you didn't understand you think you didn't hear it. in short they heard but didn't understand. 9. will the earth last forever? answer: other verse the author says one generation passes and another comes but the earth would last forever. the author is contrasting the humans passing to the earth always existing. its like saying, generations have come and gone but this earth is always here meaning generations would still come and go and the earth would still be here. the word forever, is actually flexible, it means a long time, example in the bible verse psalm 23 : 6, it says "and i would dwell in the house of the lord forever" does it mean we live in the house of God eternity? no. the author is saying he would be with God till the end of his life on earth. so in short its misunderstanding by people. secondly, some Christians believe there would be a new earth with paradise. so technically the earth would still be for eternity. 10. is Jesus the only man to have ascended to heaven? answer: Jesus was speaking here saying "If I told you earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you heavenly things? No one has ascended into heaven, but He who descended from heaven: the Son of Man." two answers, there is possibility Jesus is telling the people hes speaking to, none of them has ascended to heaven. which is the fact. secondly, Jesus is telling the people, he came down from heaven so he has superior knowledge. no one has ascended to heaven and back with such a knowledge. do you think Jesus doesnt know prophets ascended to heaven? no. context is important.

11. are children to be put to death for the sins of the father? answer: Only God can do that. we are not to put children to death for the sins of the father. but same as God destroyed sodom and gomorrah, likely they had children, meaning the children likely suffered for the sins of their parents. so as moses law, we humans are not to put people to death for the sins of their fathers. 12. does God rest? answer: no. the verses he quoted doesnt say anything about God resting. but there are verses like God resting on the 7th day. it doesnt literally mean he went to rest for energy. it simply means he stopped creation. if you don't work on a day, its considered rest day, but are you really resting if you aren't tired?. no. its simply misunderstanding, applying basic logic to a verse. 13. how many valiant men of soldiers? answer: he took two different books of the bible and expect them to have the same number? lol. should they go to war everyday with the same number of soldiers? such a silly logic. its basically two different stories. 14. how many horse men? answer: same as above. two different stories from different books of the bible. 15. how many shekels? answer: Two different stories. 16. David killed how many men? answer: two different stories. what did they expect? David to only have one war?. such a silly logic. this is hilarious very weak atheist arguments. 17. how many people reviled Jesus on the cross? answer: you're comparing stories of witnesses of an event writing their accounts. one author says, those who were crucified with Jesus were insulting him, another says, One of them was insulting him, meaning the authors heard he was insulted. so they insulted Jesus and one repented later on. 18. how many blind men Jesus healed at Jericho one or two ? answer: Jericho is a city Jesus went frequently, there is possibility its different days or different times of the same day. the logic of the atheist is funny, hes expecting one miracle one event one person. Jesus performed miracles throughout the cities back and forth. 19. how many people visited Jesus tomb? answer: the logic of the question is flawed. when i write a story and say, trump visited india, and another person writes the story and says trump and his son visited india and another person says trump and all his security and his son visited india is it contradictory? no. each author is writing what they think its important to know. you take all together and form the complete story. the gospels are accounts of different authors of the life of Jesus, why would you expect them to copy paste from each other? lol. i really laughed at this question. 20. original designated punishment for fortune telling? answer: death. when Jesus came he brought sin and repentance. that's why when they were about to stone the adulterer Jesus said, he without sin cast the first stone, and Jesus forgave her. but God would still punish fortune tellers with hell which is the second death. 21. hitting your parents? answer: not death. do you think they just killed people for just tapping their parents? be realistic. the verse is regarding people who hit/beat their parents to the extent could cause death. 22. cursing parents? answer: this form of cursing is different from the modern form of cursing where we use swear words. that form of cursing was a spiritual form of cursing using the name of God its similar to spiritism. you can research on this as explained by Jews themselves. you think they're going to kill their kids for saying f*ck you dady?. lol. 23. a person who rejects the verdict of the judge or priest must be put to death? answer: Moses is telling them anyone who doesnt obey the priest or judge appointed by God in the land they are going, the person who disobeys their verdict must be put to death. it was considered contempt of court to disobey the verdict of the judge.

i spent a few hours to answer all the questions. summary is at the end. 1. how long does God's anger last? answer: that's up to God, if a person repents they are forgiven, if they don't repent they go to hell forever. so his anger is forever and not forever at the same time. it depends on if the person repents. its not contradiction its lack of understanding. 2. does Yahweh tempt people? answer: God doesnt tempt but God allows people to be tempted by satan. God only test people. Abraham sacrificing his child was a test, not a tempt. 3. is a man justified by faith or works or both? answer: a man is justified by faith but faith should lead you into good works. you cannot say you have faith and do bad works then you didn't have faith. faith leads to the good works. 4. has anyone seen God or no one has seen God? answer: when people see God in the old testament they see a vessel of God, like Moses seeing God, but hes seeing a burning bush, or clouds, etc. that is not God, for God is spirit and eyes cannot see God. what they saw is a vessel of God that God spoke through to them. No man hath seen God the Father except the Son of God Jesus Christ. and even the body Jesus had was a vessel he used because he said he existed with the father before coming on earth. 5. does Yahweh delight in burnt offerings? answer: you have to obey him first. the verses are not contradicting, God is telling the people that when he brought their fathers Moses etc out of the land of Egypt he didn't tell them anything concerning burnt offering, but he told them specifically to obey him. the people didnt care about obeying God but they cared about burnt offering. if you read in context its easy to understand. 6. is God the author of evil? answer: what is evil? God would punish people in hell is that evil?. evil is relative. other translations say, God creates calamity. calamity is also like destroying people in sodom and gomorrah by fire, is that evil?. again, evil is relative. when God does something we don't call it evil although it can be a calamity. 7. was humans created before the animals? answer: Genesis 1 is giving you a day by day steps. Genesis 2 is not giving you any day by day steps, genesis 2 is giving you different stories together not step by step. the point is, God created humans and animals in one day, there's also possibility he created some animals first, then human second then other animals etc. again, its not an hour by hour to-do list, its a whole day by day what was done in the day. 8. on the road to Damascus did paul's travelling companions hear the voice that spoke to paul? answer: acts 9 : 7 is clear, they heard the voice they couldn't see who spoke. acts 22 : 9, says they didn't understand. some translations write they "heard not". the point is, they heard but they didn't understand. another meaning for "heard not" is inaudible, meaning you're hearing but you cannot get what is being said, like you're listening to another language. imagine you're speaking to a friend and he quickly speaks another language, and you ask him, hey i didn't hear what you said, basically you heard it but you didn't understand and since you didn't understand you think you didn't hear it. in short they heard but didn't understand. 9. will the earth last forever? answer: other verse the author says one generation passes and another comes but the earth would last forever. the author is contrasting the humans passing to the earth always existing. its like saying, generations have come and gone but this earth is always here meaning generations would still come and go and the earth would still be here. the word forever, is actually flexible, it means a long time, example in the bible verse psalm 23 : 6, it says "and i would dwell in the house of the lord forever" does it mean we live in the house of God eternity? no. the author is saying he would be with God till the end of his life on earth. so in short its misunderstanding by people. secondly, some Christians believe there would be a new earth with paradise. so technically the earth would still be for eternity. 10. is Jesus the only man to have ascended to heaven? answer: Jesus was speaking here saying "If I told you earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you heavenly things? No one has ascended into heaven, but He who descended from heaven: the Son of Man." two answers, there is possibility Jesus is telling the people hes speaking to, none of them has ascended to heaven. which is the fact. secondly, Jesus is telling the people, he came down from heaven so he has superior knowledge. no one has ascended to heaven and back with such a knowledge. do you think Jesus doesnt know prophets ascended to heaven? no. context is important.

11. are children to be put to death for the sins of the father? answer: Only God can do that. we are not to put children to death for the sins of the father. but same as God destroyed sodom and gomorrah, likely they had children, meaning the children likely suffered for the sins of their parents. so as moses law, we humans are not to put people to death for the sins of their fathers. 12. does God rest? answer: no. the verses he quoted doesnt say anything about God resting. but there are verses like God resting on the 7th day. it doesnt literally mean he went to rest for energy. it simply means he stopped creation. if you don't work on a day, its considered rest day, but are you really resting if you aren't tired?. no. its simply misunderstanding, applying basic logic to a verse. 13. how many valiant men of soldiers? answer: he took two different books of the bible and expect them to have the same number? lol. should they go to war everyday with the same number of soldiers? such a silly logic. its basically two different stories. 14. how many horse men? answer: same as above. two different stories from different books of the bible. 15. how many shekels? answer: Two different stories. 16. David killed how many men? answer: two different stories. what did they expect? David to only have one war?. such a silly logic. this is hilarious very weak atheist arguments. 17. how many people reviled Jesus on the cross? answer: you're comparing stories of witnesses of an event writing their accounts. one author says, those who were crucified with Jesus were insulting him, another says, One of them was insulting him, meaning the authors heard he was insulted. so they insulted Jesus and one repented later on. 18. how many blind men Jesus healed at Jericho one or two ? answer: Jericho is a city Jesus went frequently, there is possibility its different days or different times of the same day. the logic of the atheist is funny, hes expecting one miracle one event one person. Jesus performed miracles throughout the cities back and forth. 19. how many people visited Jesus tomb? answer: the logic of the question is flawed. when i write a story and say, trump visited india, and another person writes the story and says trump and his son visited india and another person says trump and all his security and his son visited india is it contradictory? no. each author is writing what they think its important to know. you take all together and form the complete story. the gospels are accounts of different authors of the life of Jesus, why would you expect them to copy paste from each other? lol. i really laughed at this question. 20. original designated punishment for fortune telling? answer: death. when Jesus came he brought sin and repentance. that's why when they were about to stone the adulterer Jesus said, he without sin cast the first stone, and Jesus forgave her. but God would still punish fortune tellers with hell which is the second death. 21. hitting your parents? answer: not death. do you think they just killed people for just tapping their parents? be realistic. the verse is regarding people who hit/beat their parents to the extent could cause death. 22. cursing parents? answer: this form of cursing is different from the modern form of cursing where we use swear words. that form of cursing was a spiritual form of cursing using the name of God its similar to spiritism. you can research on this as explained by Jews themselves. you think they're going to kill their kids for saying f*ck you dady?. lol. 23. a person who rejects the verdict of the judge or priest must be put to death? answer: Moses is telling them anyone who doesnt obey the priest or judge appointed by God in the land they are going, the person who disobeys their verdict must be put to death. it was considered contempt of court to disobey the verdict of the judge.

24. death for following another religion or not seeking Yahweh? answer: it says to the Jews he that sacrifices to another God except Yahweh should be put to death. the law applied only within themselves. they dont apply this law now because of Christ taking our sins away as we can easily repent. but people who still worship other gods would still face hell which is the second death. 25. prostitution or adultery death? answer: yes that was the punishment then, and Jesus forgave the adultery. as above, we have now repentance. but those who don't repent would face the second death, hell. 26. the rest of the round was the same repetition of the laws and the punishment which my answer would be the same as above 24 25. 27. rich as blessing, or giving to the poor? answer: we are blessed with riches and also we are supposed to help the poor then we get blessed more. its a cycle. 28. did the temple curtain rip before or after Jesus died? answer: it ripped during the time Jesus died. you're reading an account of three people, and the temple was at a different location from his crucifixion location, so they later heard the temple robe split into two, and this was because of his death, do you expect them to copy paste eachother story? no. one writes, after he died, one writes as he was dying. the point is, the robe split during his death. its like someone writes a story and say, he saw two cars in an accident on the street in the morning, another person later in the afternoon goes to see the cars at the same location not towed away, he says, he saw two cars in an accident. the point is they are giving the vital story of two cars that had an accident since they both might have not even seen the exact time the cars collide. the disciples were at the cross, they got news the robes split in the temple. why would you expect them to copy eachother story?. lol. 29. who put the purple robe on Jesus, Pilate soldiers or Herod soldiers? answer: the next verse says "12 And the same day Pilate and Herod were made friends together: for before they were at enmity between themselves." in short, their soldiers. he was sent between Pilate and Herod consistently, meaning eachside soldiers were moving from one base to the other so if he was worn a robe at any of the sides base the other side army who brought him along would also join in, since they are friends. 30. did Jesus curse the fig tree before or after driving the merchants from the temple? answer: you're comparing witnesses writing an event of what they recalled happening on a day. why would you expect them to copy paste eachother?. the gospel of Mathew is known to be arranged topically rather than chronologically. 31. was Jesus born during the reign of Herod or during the governorship of Caesar?. answer: he didn't have a problem with Pilate and Caesar regarding Jesus robe, but he now has a problem with Herod and Caesar both being leaders? lol this atheist is funny. then they didn't have a country, they had people ruling districts like cities, so they had different leaders at different jurisdictions. 32. when the women arrived at Jesus tomb was the tomb opened or closed? answer: none of the verses say they arrived at a closed tomb, it says, the one that the atheist thought it suggested that, says the women came to see the tomb, meaning they took the journey to go see the tomb. likely the tomb was opened before they arrived and they met the keepers or security running back. 33. did Judas die by hanging or dying by falling and spilling his guts? answer: both, the hanging verse doesnt even say that's how he died. it just said he hanged himself. the later verse shows he actually died, so both is right, he hanged himself and fell and died. so in summary. i. read the verses in context. ii. understand that the gospels are written in level of importance or chronology based on the author. iii. the laws of death was practiced and now we can repent, but if people don't repent they face second death which is hell. basically we have easier repentance. iv. some stories are different.

@@thehonesttruth415 I've tried posting this a couple times, but I don't see anything. I'm going to try splitting it up as well and see if that makes a difference. I’m not sure why you responded to me instead of just making a regular comment (which would be toward the actual creator of the video), but I’ll give it a go I guess. 1. Did you actually look at the verses he referenced? Jeremiah 17:4 says, “I will enslave you to your enemies in a land you do not know, for you have kindled my anger, and it will burn forever.” It doesn’t say “and it will burn forever unless you repent.” Micah also doesn’t mention anything about repentance. Funny how God doesn’t seem to care about repentance until the new testament. 2. Ah yes, the distinction between temptation and testing. You’re right though, Abraham wasn’t tempted, because tempting implies some benefit if he does it. The reason Abraham was totally willing to murder his son was because he was afraid of God: “Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son.” I’m not sure why the all-loving and all-merciful God would tell someone to murder their son, and I’m doubly not sure why such a god would want a prophet that’s willing to murder their own son just because God said to, but okay. 3. Again, did you even look at the verses? James 2:24 says, “You see that a person is considered righteous by what they do and not by faith alone,” and Romans 3:28 says, “For we maintain that a person is justified by faith apart from the works of the law.” Those are clearly and directly contradictory. And before you say, “But different authors!” or something, let me remind you that the point of the video is not necessarily to “disprove” the bible, it’s to show that it is self-contradicting. The bible is supposed to be the infallible word of God, which is why it’s taken so seriously, no? So every time you say, “Well actually, it’s okay that the bible contradicts itself because it was written by multiple fallible humans,” you’re only proving the point of the video. Perhaps you should read the description because you clearly haven’t already. 4. There are plenty of instances of people seeing God, such as Genesis 32:30 where Jacob sees him “face to face,” but okay. Let me guess, they’re all out of context or not interpreted correctly. “Face to face” doesn’t actually mean face to face, right? It must be nice to able to pick what fits your belief and ignore all the rest. Can you answer two questions for me? Is God all powerful or not? Because if he is, he can do whatever the fuck he wants, like appear in front of humans with his true form. And is God human-like? Christians say all the time that we’re made in God’s image, so why can’t he appear in his true form? Is he not human-like? If he is, what is so shocking about his true form that we can’t see it? 5. “You have to obey him first” is not an answer to a yes or no question. Does God or does God not enjoy ritualistically sacrificing animals by fire? Here’s God speaking in Gen 22:2; “Take your son, your only son, Isaac, whom you love, and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering.” 6. Ignoring the verses again I see. Isaiah 45:7 specifically says, “I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.” Are you going to say it’s a mistranslation or something? Because again, read the description of the video. Also, are you really arguing for relative morality right now? Last I checked, the main Christian position is that morality comes from God and is objective. NonStampCollector has other videos showcasing plenty of “evil” things that Yahweh has done, and if you’re going to say, “But when God does it, it’s not actually evil, it’s just a ‘calamity,’” then why does anyone need the bible for morality? Plenty of people have a sense of morality that these things God has done are wrong, so either morality doesn’t come from God or God is immoral according to the morals that HE gave us. 7. And how do we even know any of this happened? You mention several times that “Oh this is just because there’s different authors recounting their own experience,” but I’m pretty sure there weren’t any fuckin humans around when God created all of existence. So we’re supposed to just trust shit like this because “the bible says it happened so it did,” but in other areas that becomes “well there’s different authors”? 8. Read the description of the video. The bible is supposed to be the instructions from an all-powerful being, so it should be pretty damn clear, but it isn’t. Many people claim that the bible is infallible, and the point of this video is to show that it isn’t. This is supposed to be one of the most important documents in existence, created by the most powerful being in existence to spread his message, and yet you have to sit there and explain, “Well actually, it says one thing but that’s not what it actually means.” 9. Okay, sure, but there’s still the same issue as 8. “I know this is the most essential book in the world that tells you how to save yourself so you don’t suffer in hell forever (which apparently might not actually be forever since forever apparently doesn’t mean forever), but you have to interpret it very carefully because it’s not very clear cut with its meanings.” The fact that there are so many different Christian sects only proves this even more. Why is your interpretation correct whereas “some Christians” are wrong? All the different sects believe different things even though they all use the same book, and that’s a problem. 10. Jesus specifically says that no one has ever gone into heaven except himself, and the other verse says Elijah went to heaven. This isn’t a matter of context, it’s a matter of Jesus saying something that is contradictory to another part of the bible. Even if you’re correct, the point of the video is that the bible cannot be taken at face value.

11. Oh okay, so as long as God does it, it’s fine. I mean, in my mind, punishing someone for something they didn’t do simply because their parents did it is morally wrong, but when God does it, it’s not evil. It’s just a “calamity” huh? God is all-loving and all-merciful, except when he isn’t and punishes children for no reason because he’s a jealous psychopath. 12. “It’s simply misunderstanding.” Are you perhaps “misunderstanding” the definition of the word “weary”? You can also pull whatever mental gymnastics you want about how God isn’t ACTUALLY resting when it says rest, but the bible says that he rests. Even if you’re correct here, you’re only further proving that the bible can’t be taken at face value because it doesn’t actually mean what it says. 13. Oh okay. So when there’s a problem with eye witness accounts, it’s “They’re just retelling their own version so it’s expected that there would be some inaccuracies,” but here it’s “They’re not even the same story.” How convenient. Well, Mr. Context-is-important, when you look at the rest of those verses, it looks like the same story to me. 2 Samuel 24:2 says, “So the king said to Joab and the army commanders with him, ‘Go throughout the tribes of Israel from Dan to Beersheba and enroll the fighting men, so that I may know how many there are,’” and 1 Chronicles 21:2 says, “ So David said to Joab and the commanders of the troops, ‘Go and count the Israelites from Beersheba to Dan. Then report back to me so that I may know how many there are.’” They both also mention David feeling guilt and God giving David three options, among other things. They are so clearly the same story, you must be delusional to think they aren’t. 14. Same as above. Are you genuinely delusional, or are you just smoking something? Reading 2 Samuel 8 and 1 Chronicles 18 is like reading the same damn thing. “He defeated the Philistines, then he defeated the Moabites, then he defeated Hadadezer son of Rehob, king of Zobah.” Are you telling me he fucking fought and defeated Hadadezer son of Rehob, king of Zobah twice? It’s painfully obvious that they’re the same story. It’s strange that you try to act like they aren’t, but for other issues you try to argue that “it’s just the author’s retelling.” 15. This is in the same damn chapter as 13, and again, they’re so obviously the same story about David building an altar. I don’t know if you’re just in denial or if you genuinely think these are different stories, but either way, your opinion on the bible isn’t very credible at this point. 16. We’re still dealing with Samuel and Chronicles, which are apparently the same damn book, so why would these be different stories? After describing the chief killing 300/800 in one encounter, they both go on to talk about Eleazar and how he fought with David at Pas Dammim and how three of the thirty chief warriors came to see David at Adullam. What do you hope to accomplish by suggesting that they’re not the same story when they clearly are? 17. What are you even talking about right now? Each story specifically says two criminals are crucified with Jesus but give different accounts about what they say. It’s not just a matter of “Well we heard insults.” Mark and Matthew both says that both rebels insulted Jesus, but Luke says that one was nice to Jesus. There’s eyewitness testimony and then there’s lying. If one of the criminals was nice to Jesus, why would Mark and Matthew not mention that? Frankly, I’m surprised you didn’t try to tell us that they were just talking about different stories. 18. Potentially, but this is talking about the same story. Mark, Matthew, and Luke all keep repeating each other, and this is the same. There’s mention of “the Little Children and Jesus” in both Mark and Luke, “Jesus Predicts His Death a Third time” in all three, and so on. They also all talk about the story of the blind man, and it’s pretty clearly the same story. It’s pretty easy to see that when you look at the context, which is something you supposedly love so much. Jesus, his disciples, and a large crowd leave/approach Jericho, there’s a blind man/men who start shouting, “Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!” The man is then rebuked by the crowd, but he shouts again. It’s the same story, but somehow the eyewitnesses got confused about how many blind people there were. 19. “Why would you expect them to copy paste from each other?” I don’t know, maybe because they’re talking about the same events? Imagine being a juror on some murder case, and the first witness says, “The body was discovered by Mary.” The second witness says, “The body was discovered by Mary and the other Mary.” The third witness says, “The body was discovered by Mary, Mary, and Salome.” Wouldn’t you be like, “Why are these people giving me different versions of the same event?” You would think that one of the most important events in the world - the literal son of God rising from the dead - people would be consistent about things. The authors aren’t just being generic, they’re mentioning these people by name. You’re also ignoring the angel part, where some mention two angels and some only mention one angel. Are you seriously going to tell me that these dumbass authors thought it was insignificant to mention how many angels there were? “Two angels came down? Eh, the audience only needs to know that there was one angel.” 20. Yes, congratulations, that’s what the video said. The whole point of this segment, in case you missed the intro to it, is that God is supposed to be all-loving and all-merciful, and “death” being the answer to anything runs counter to that. 21. “Hitting your parents isn’t punished by death, the verse is only talking about children who hit their parents REALLY HARD, only then are they punished by death.” - You. 22. First of all, you’re not denying that the penalty is death. Secondly, you’re nuts. You make it sound like these children are getting killed because they’re performing some satanic ritual, but in actuality, the punishment is death simply for using God’s name in the “curse.” So no, they don’t get killed for saying, “Fuck you daddy,” they get killed for saying, “God damn you daddy.” Either way, it still isn’t very all-loving and all-merciful. 23. Again, you’re not denying that the punishment is death. You can explain it as much as you want and make it seem very reasonable from this perspective or that perspective, but from the perspective of “God loves everyone and is full of mercy,” death is not an appropriate punishment.

He’s both the winner and not the winner. It’s biblical!

@@davidw2739 You are so right! Here's a bible question for you! Which weapon did David use to kill Goliath? A sling and stone or Goliath's own sword?

@@auditect950 yes

That's ten points for@@TruXai!

@@TruXaiwhen I think ‘yes’ it kinda confused me but now I realised you meant ‘both’. The video was just so fast-paced!

not like it wasnt hand translated multiple times already

That's why Christianity today is not what Christianity was in the beginning. Critiquing Christianity today is like Critiquing a defiled artwork. It's original beauty and intent no longer recognizable.

@@tobiaskvarnung3411 Yeah, I can say as a catholic myself: after seeing the pope allow homosexual marriage within the church, Christianity isn’t all that it’s cracked up to be after all this time.

@@Mcboi-sm7ru I see you are against homosexual marriage but are you against homosexuality itself?

@@syenous2454 If a homosexual shows dedication to their lover, then im fine with homosexuality, but someone who is homosexual for sexual gratification and or to be hopping from penis to penis, then that’s a problem. I also said what I did to bring to light how corruptible and changeable catholicism is, to the point where it can completely contradict what original christianity was supposed to look like. I do imagine though that there is a completely unbiased translation of the oldest bible that can more accurately represent the original christianity for what it was supposed to be.

There's nothing impressive about me clinging desperately to an ever-diminishing feeling of relevance before it's utterly snuffed out.

NonStampCollector damn. Words to live by

NonStampCollector was just on a KZfaq live stream last week! He was very surprised that almost 200 people were online with him within a few minutes & said he expected that maybe 3 or 4 people would eventually wander on. It was a very nice surprise to hear from him live.

@@NonStampCollector you're alive, nice

NonStampCollector a good way to stay relevant in the online world is to make content more often than a couple times per decade hehe it’s been years since I saw this video for the first time but it’s so good and for as long as Christianity is a relevant topic this will be a relevant video

Gallimaufry Animations same, hahaha

I love, that i can hear the audio quality..and boy does it sound like 2010.

9 years and 1 month is also a correct answer!

I have watched it multiple times during these 9 years. Every time I cracked up laughing.

Right!?!? Fuck. Great video.

The reason is because less than even 10% of these mentioned in the video are even reasonably debatable. All of these are not contradictions, in fact many of them are complimentary and tell the same thing if you really look into it.

if I may ask, how are they complementary? pick about 5 examples from the video and explain please

@@notaseagull3320Giving a hard limit to the number to use is a little convenient, but I’ll give a shot at explaining even just the first 5. God does not have hatred for us, but for our sinful hearts and actions. God protected Judah, but they turned away from Him and thus turned away His protection as well. The punishment for their sin is separation from God, and that left them exposed to conquest. In Micah the ode states that God has immense mercy for us despite our sin and forgives us. This is later strengthened through Jesus who gave us a way to be with God in Heaven. While these seem to demonstrate that God both forgives and doesn’t forgive, it isn’t exactly that simple. God is infinitely holy, and cannot be in the presence of sin, so therefore any sin separates us infinitely from God without His mercy. God hates sin and through our own choices we turn away from His mercy and must accept the consequences of those actions.

@@notaseagull3320​​⁠The second one isn’t even debatable at all as God did not tempt Abraham, but tested his faithfulness. God cannot tempt because it is sinful to tempt someone into sin as the Bible states that anyone who pushes another to sin is guilty of the same sin. The third is stating that we are only saved by God’s mercy through Jesus, but faith without works is a little pointless. Yes, you are saved, but it is like saying that just because a man is hired he is employed, but if he does no work, his reward will be little. We demonstrate our faith and love for God through our actions, but it is not by our own actions that we are saved.

⁠@@notaseagull3320​​⁠the fourth one is no man can see God, in His entirety. God can project Himself through vessels, such as the burning bush. Even in exodus it showed that when Moses was with God, his face was glowing afterwards due to God’s holiness and power. The fifth one is also irrelevant as burnt offerings are in remembrance as even stated in the very same verse that was cited in the video. It states that it is for His name to be remembered and He will bless you. Even the cited verse in Jeremiah shows this stating that God did not say that He wants or demands burnt offerings, but said to obey His commands so their life will go well. The sacrifices and burnt offerings are meant in remembrance for us to obey His commands.

If your emotional dependency for certain ideas is strong enough you can justify anything.

they’re delusional cultists, as are all religious crazies

Just discovered this channel like 15 years later and it's one of my favorites, I love how he tackles super common issues with the bible and the videos are all hilarious

What is there to justify? Yes, the Bible is full of contradictions, who cares.

The fact that he hearted this comment.

Someone commented lists debunking your"contradictions"

@@Christine-og4ni yep. People do *try* to do that

@@Christine-og4ni read the whole list, half of them are literally "probably out of context"

Those points are just as there as god is

Just wanna point out the 666 likes on this comment 🤣

And now, for you Christians - ARE there any contradictions in the Bible?

@Alex Garcia Dude, that was an impressively protracted reply - but clearly you misjudge my interest in your chosen rabbit hole(s). I'm sure someone will read it, tho...

@@rosshewage6893 looks like his comment is gone. I do remember it though (because he would just copy and past it under a bunch of comments.) His lengthy criticism sums up to "the English translation has contradictions in it, but thise are just errors made when translating it from its original language." Why this criticism of his falls flat is because that's sonething the video creator addresses in the description, where he says he's specifically talking about the English translation in tge video.

@@rosshewage6893 no

But I’ve never seen a bible

bad argument: veritasdomain.wordpress.com/2020/03/25/bible-contradiction-was-the-tomb-opened-or-closed-when-the-women-arrived/

What difference does it make?

It blatantly shows as just one of many examples why the bible is inconsistent and contradictory all the while Christians will claim all the live long day that the bible is the word or God and he is perfect and infallible and is not the author of confusion even though the Bible is the absolute most confusing and inconsistent book on earth. It also shows that the stone was already moved before they arrived which would be a simple coincidence that lead them to believe Jesus rolled it away and walked out versus some wild witness to an earthquake and angels coming down to move the stone. If you caught your kids sneaking cookies out of an unopened package and they told you that an angel came down and opened it up and gave them the cookies, what would your response be to that explanation?

​@@cheapbatteriescredibility?

​@@cheapbatteriesIf someone tells me "I was born on June", I'll believe them. If the next day they tell me "I was born on August", I will be skeptical. If the next day they tell me "I was born on January", I won't trust that person. Same reasoning with the Bible.

Yup I have been an atheist for many years but just recently begun reading the Bible and it only confirms my beliefs even more😂

my mom is making me read the bible and i can feel the dangerousness come inside me

@@waffler-yz3gwI hope you are fine

​@@waffler-yz3gw 19 inches of venom

A neutron star

Never go to a girls only feminist catholic school....

Good one!

@Your Worst Nightmare - Facts bro, idk how i ended up there, but here i am.

@@eushandageorge2554 "are you good e ought to get into heaven." Depending on which Christian you ask, some will say that to get into heaven, someone doesnt have to do one 'good' thing in their life.

@@thefuckwhat7851 How could someone be a feminist and a Catholic??

I love that quote.

If even after all that, and a theist still doesn’t see their religion/myth for the delusion that it is... they’re too far gone

@@YokaiX I mean, there are points in the new testament specifically meant to remove the rules of the old so you cant flat out call it a delusion unless there's proof otherwise.

Jayden White yet Jesus said he came to fulfill the law of the OT, not get rid of it. The Bible is merely a mythbook of contradictions. It is a delusion. Religion requires faith, strong conviction despite a lack of evidence. A delusion is a firm belief despite contradictory evidence. Therefore, faith in a religion and gods is an irrational delusion. There is plenty proof that debunks religion in general as myths. Also, “The God Delusion” by Dr.Richard Dawkins.

Jayden White “ I even went kosher just to be safe! “

I mean some of these are definitely bad faith arguements but understood

I hope you find your way back to Jesus. Praying for you, sir.

I wish I found this video when I was a Christian. Probably would've helped me along much faster.

@@steelajax7925 Help you along to what? Genuinely, how do you get your morality?

​@@thrillhovanhouten253if your only reason for being a good person is so that you won't go to hell, you're not a good person.

I mean that is what the catholics say, but it’s due to making their own information themselves based off the mistranslations of the Bible rather than by revelation.

ken is clearly the better player, to be fair

I thought for sure it was going to be the host instead of either contestant, because churches so often put their preachers on undeserved pedestals.

Though Craig is the only one who got an actual prize.

PleaseCiteYourSources Thanks "Bible believer" lol

Yeah I remember my mom was lecturing me and a bible verse said something along the lines of fools believe everything they hear.

That's not ironic. Most believers don't really read the Bible

most of the bible believers doesn't read the bible anyway

BuT iTs HiStOrIcAl

People just say that the starving children are cursed. Wouldn’t God prevent humans from being cursed if he was all good?

Well off white kid, "yeah let em live" starving kid in africa *_"GET NAE NAE'D"_*

So true

Charles McMillion that is a complete misunderstanding of God and his ways. This video has no actual contradictions because it fails to actually look into what each of those verses actually mean, just as you fail to realize the truth of God’s will. God isn’t a puppet master who controls everything. People aren’t cursed and they aren’t doomed. Children starving is an issue created by the world, not by God. God works in “mysterious ways” because we can’t comprehend it, which is what makes it funny that you attempt to. You don’t and could not know the ultimate, divine will of the omnipotent God. You can’t, and I can’t for that matter, fathom hardly a thing about God and Heaven and his plan. Our human brains aren’t big enough. I don’t blame you for being completely off basis though, because the Bible says that those who have not received the spirit cannot have spiritual knowledge, and thus can’t understand spiritual matters. You can believe what you believe, after all, only God can save people and thus I can’t do a thing but plant a seed, but i won’t allow for you to say things that are inherently untrue. People dying is proof that people are imperfect and sinful, not that God doesn’t care. If humans really are so bad and evil, why should ANYTHING good happen? I think that’s the question you need to ask.

@@aurumjust5539 I've read the Bible. I grew up reading the Bible in a Pentecostal/Baptist. Actually *reading* the Bible is why I left the church. Following is a spot-on summary of what the Bible actually says. You let me know when you can make any of it sensible. The Bible in 2 Minutes by Ms. Rachel C. Millison God who is "vengeful", "furious" and "full of wrath" but who also, somehow "is love"... Creates the universe, including imperfect human beings, evil to tempt them and Hell to eternally torture them in when they inevitably fall for it. The entire first version of the human race is tainted with original sin and condemned because the proto-woman, who was made from a rib of a sand-man, bit the fruit of a magic tree-of-knowledge after being duped by a talking snake that was actually a manifestation of the evil God created in the first place. Even though he "is love", God gets upset and kills all the proto-peoples' descendants in a giant magical flood that over-topped all the mountains on Earth but somehow left no flood layer in the sedimentary record. Everyone and everything dies, except for the family of a 600 year-old man who built a giant boat and floated away with some 12 million species of plants and animals who commuted from all over the world to the Ark in pairs, even though many, if not most of those species reproduce asexually. Not to be outdone by a snake, a donkey talks later on as well. To the second version of the human race, who are also somehow responsible for the whole talking-snake thing, God offers forgiveness. But, there's a hitch, because the omnipotent, omniscient creator of the Universe apparently can't just forgive humans. He has to send part of himself (Spirit) to Earth to impregnate a Jewish girl so she can give birth to another part of himself (Jesus) so that that part of himself (Jesus) can be killed as a blood sacrifice to himself (God). This part of him (Jesus) was with himself (God) from the beginning of time, but somehow forgets about it when he gets to Earth. He gets dunked in a river and recovers at least part of his memory. Before being sacrificed, he spends 3 years teaching people to "love your enemies", "turn the other cheek" and forgive, even though the other part of him, which is "a jealous and avenging God", "takes vengeance on his adversaries, reserves wrath for his enemies" and "visits the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation". God, who commands humans to have no other gods before him but is somehow three-gods-in-one, outlines all of this in a holy book, but it's so obscure, inconsistent and self-contradictory that virtually no two groups of humans can agree on what it really means, and often end up killing each other over it. Apparently, the all-powerful, all-knowing creator of the Universe can't just write a clear instruction manual, either. In any case, if people don't get the message about being inherently evil and needing forgiveness, the part of himself he sent to Earth to be killed in the blood sacrifice to himself will judge them accordingly and he will send them to Hell to writhe in agony for all eternity, because he loves them and "is good to all". The End.

Was the metropolis appellatived utterly reduced to rubble by Nebuchadrezzar in ancient times, so much so it has never been relocated, or was it conquered by a different paramilitaristic spearhead centuries afterwards? Is it still thriving in the concurrent day and age? Craig: NO!! Ken: YES!! The game show host: You are simultaneously wrong, and right ✅️ Hahahahaha

what plot holes? do you care to elaborate? this video was put together in a lazy and frankly idiotic way. There are ZERO contradictions in the bible , none if you think there's one let a bible scholar take a look at it. ....

@Xeno The Strange whether you believe in God or not or whether we are idiots for believing isn't the issue here, the problem is that a bunch of people are showing up on YT videos yelling "contradiction" right and left without even looking at the entire picture. How many skeptics have actually read the bible cover to cover? I'm willing to say less than 1% yet they see other people commenting on contradictions and they jump right in the wagon without a solid foundation. I'd rather see someone like you saying the belief in God is nuts because you think it is than saying the bible is full of contradictions, "therefore it can't be true" that's a lie..

@@AutotuneSucksBalls Then what say you to these contradictions shown in the video? In what way are these contradictions not contradictions?

@@reksaifeetpics9868 which one? give me your list

@@AutotuneSucksBalls Literally all the ones shown in the video you daft numbskull.

last i checked, that's islam

Uhhhh... prison?

I mean like, death does not always mean all must live forever. There's always an ending for every story. Having such a long life isn't always peaceful, do YOU want to live forever? Being in this everlasting so called peaceful world? If everyone is immortal will we actually achieve peace or will another problem arise? I'm not siding with anyone here but death could be many things and to some extent, death is sometimes better than living

Wait nevemind I watched the entire thing

@@marselmusic last I checked, that's every religion.

I would learn theology than to believe a fucking stick animation. Not saying they're wrong tho.

​@@AsianAnticsOfficial I studied religions. I attended not only Sunday school, but also courses of deeper knowledge about the Bible. the youtube man is objectively right. Sunday schools are objectively wrong.

@@joeshabe proof?

​@@AsianAnticsOfficial let's start with basic stuff. I'll simplify some things for now, and you're free to ask questions: 1) the Exodus never happened 🙅‍♂ neither was there a new bright star in the sky when Jesus was born 2) a lot of normal early Christians didn't believe that Jesus was god, but they were outlawed by the Christian elite later on (see Arianism), claimed to be heretics. obviously, they didn't believe in the trinity either. people do tend to become deified with time (the Buddha, Krishna, Roman emperors, etc.). now you may realise why the Christian elite would make up new verses in the Bible (see next point) 3) a whole sea of verses and chapters are inauthentic: Matthew 17:21, 1 John 5:7 (second half), Acts 8:37, Mark 16:9-20, John 1:1-18; 7:53-8:11; chapter 21 4) sometimes additional words are inserted in translations. there's no "fasting" in the original verse of 1 Corinthians 7:5. 1 Timothy 3:16 - the original says "who/which" (ὅς), not "God" (Θεός). 5) there are a lot of discrepancies in the Bible, because these stories were oral legends during dozens of years before being written down for the first time (btw, the Gospels weren't written by eyewitnesses of Jesus). compare for example Matthew 9:18-26 (the girl's dead) and Mark 5:21-43 (alive); Acts 9:1-9 (people heard the voice, but didn't see anyone), Acts 22:1-9 and 26:4-14 (people see the light, but don't hear the voice). 6) hell is fake, even if you only look at the contradictory Bible itself. there are some parts with eternal punishment, and there are others with no eternal punishment, and each Christian chooses which parts to believe and which parts of the Bible to ignore. look: * "You have become terrified And you will cease to be forever" - 'sinful' people will cease forever. they won't burn forever. * "fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell" - souls will be destroyed. no eternity. * "surely a live dog is better than a dead lion. For the living know they will die; but the dead do not know anything, nor have they any longer a reward, for their memory is forgotten" - there's no afterlife. I could go on for hours. long story short, both modern understanding of the Bible and its initial statements are absolutely fake. do you have any specific questions?

@@AsianAnticsOfficial read the bible verses cited to see the contradictions yourself? are you stupid?

R/I’m14andthisisdeep I’m actually 14 and found this deep

Or a metaphor, or something God said to someone else, not you. But it's o.k. he offered eternal life to someone else, not you. Eternal life sounds like a metaphor....?

@@impattman2199 Amen lol of course they misinterpret it. People always assume something is contradicting, when God was speaking to different groups of people (SPECIFICALLY TO THEM).

@@footsoldier1188 God didn't write the bible jackass, it was written by men which is why it contains over 600 contradictions and scientific absurdities.

@@liquidbraino ok mr world view. I never said God wrote it. Men did. But He used those men. Divine interference. And it contains no contradictions only stories of two people that may seem different but never did these people say they were going to be the same as the other. No contradictions. And God is above science. Even Albert Einstein said science will not be able to fully understand Gods creation.

Goodone

Lord quantum

😂 i didn't think of that but that's funny af

😂😂😂

BLASPHEMY (how dare you drag Schrödinger into this?)

Its actually Ken the one who gets half points

@@mertensiam3384 double points just sounds cooler

Holly shit i just realized

It’s cause Jesus was white.

@@HoneymanAudioProductions let's not get into a discussion about if religion is fucking stupid or not

Faith had no power, it's God who has power . If multiple authors reports do not contradict, then it is manipulated, a fool would expect the same story from multiple view points.

@@expose8434 Ok buddy

Jesus died for us all! Have a wonderful day! Jesus is God! (The Holy Trinity is the truth) 1. Jeremiah 17:4 is saying that God’s anger burns forever against sin, not sinners. 2. God wasn’t tempting Abraham, he was testing his faith, to see if he was devout enough to lead his people. 3. These aren’t contradictory, but complementary. Paul says that you are only saved by faith and faith alone, Jesus explains that if you truly have faith in him, you would follow his commandments, and James goes in to further detail about what Faith is. 4. The Holy Trinity is complex, but the face you can’t see is The Father’s, and the face you can see is The Son’s (Jesus.) 5. Gods happy about the burnt offerings, but he’s really happy about your obedience to him. What good is buying someone a gift if you don’t respect them? The gift is empty that’s what it is, devoid of love or emotion. Just like burnt offerings were without obedience. (There’s no need for burnt offerings anymore though) 6. I’m not even sure what you mean by this, but God created everything, even those who do evil, but that doesn’t mean that God wants evil. 7. Hard to explain this, so let me visualize it for you. /spawn human(s) /spawn animal(s) /rank: (Human>Animal=true) 8. The men may have heard the voice of the lord, but Paul didn’t know that, being preoccupied with blindness and knowledge of the lord, so he makes a mistake and says later that they didn’t hear him. Acts wasn’t written by Paul, so it’s possible the correct information came about to the author, and the author just told it as it was, but telling the correct story in the chapter that tells Paul’s encounter as it happened, not Paul’s recount of the encounter in a speech he gave later on. 9. 2 Peter 3:10 doesn’t say the earth will be totally destroyed, havoc will just be wreaked upon it to cleanse its sin. The Earth will turn into a paradise once the rapture is over, Revelation 21. 10. John 3:13 means that nobody has ever returned from heaven, not that nobody has ever gone there. 11. Deuteronomy 5:9 refers to children who continue in their parents footsteps in disobedience to God. 12. Tired as in he is sick and tired of bearing our sin. And again, this is the lord complaining about humans disrespecting him, he isn’t actually tired. 13. This discrepancy involves the difference in who was included in each report. In the report in 2 Samuel, the number of men of valor who drew the sword was 800,000, but did not include the standing army of 288,000 described in 1 Chronicles 27:1-15, or the 12,000 specifically attached to Jerusalem described in 2 Chronicles 1:14. Including these figures gives the grand total of 1,100,000 men of valor who composed the entire army of the men of Israel. The figure of 470,000 in 1 Chronicles 21 did not include the 30,000 men of the standing army of Judah mentioned in 2 Samuel 6:1. This is evident from the fact that the Chronicler points out that Joab did not complete the counting of the men of Judah (1 Chron. 21:6). Both calculations are correct according to the groups which were included and excluded from each report. 14. This is undoubtedly a copyist error. Probably an early copyist inadvertently omitted the word “chariot” that we find supplied in some translations. This in turn created a problem for a later copyist who would have recognized that it was not proper Hebrew structure to write “one thousand seven thousand horsemen,” so he would have reduced the second “thousand” to “hundred” resulting in the reading we now have in 2 Samuel 8:4. It is probably the 1 Chronicles passage that retains the correct number. 15. These texts are often used to challenge the inerrancy and authority of the Scriptures. As shown above they pose two problems to the reader: (1) Who owned the land, Araunah or Ornan? (2) How much did David pay him? In response to the first question, there are numerous possibilities. For instance, it is possible that Ornan also went by the name Araunah. Having and being called by more than one name was common in that day as it is today as well. It is also possible that Araunah is a title rather than a proper name. Also, if Araunah wasn’t a Hebrew but rather a Canaanite, when his name was translated into Hebrew this could have resulted in some variation of spelling. Strong’s Lexicon (#728), identifies Araunah as an "orthographical variation" of Ornan. These are each reasonable explanations. So, I don’t observe a discrepancy in the text. As to the second, there’s a lot of difference between 50 shekels of silver (2 Sam. 24:24) and 600 of gold (1 Chron. 21:24-25). Any CPA looking at a ledger would immediately see these differences. However, there is no discrepancy. 1 Chronicles 21:1 states, "Then David said, 'Here shall be the house of the Lord God and here the altar of burnt offering for Israel.'" While the smaller 50 shekels of silver refers to only the threshing floor itself, the 600-gold figure included the land surrounding the threshing floor for "the house of the Lord God" - a rather large piece of property (cf. 2 Chron. 3:3-4). The figure may also have included the land for Solomon’s future palace and numerous other buildings referred to in 1 Kings 7-8 as well. So, once again there is no discrepancy in the text. 16. Chronicles 11 was compiled earlier in David’s career, and 2 Samuel 23 was compiled towards the end of David’s career. The mighty man just beat his record, no contradiction here. 17. The Good Thief reviled Jesus in an earlier part of the crucifixion, but later came around. 18. this isn’t really contradictory, but complimentary. Neither of these verses say that there was only one or two blind men, Matthew just reveals more information that there was two blind men that Jesus healed. 19. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are all written in very different ways. Matthew presents his material topically, not chronologically. Mark is usually very brief or ignores a great amount of information. Luke is the most complete and presents his material in a chronological order. The gospel of John is not as brief as Mark and is less complete than Luke. But like before, these verses are not contradictory, but complementary. None of them openly say that there was only one man/angel or two men/angels, and that they were or weren’t causing an earthquake. 20. Again, not contradictory, but complimentary. 21. God, Infinite and all knowing, creator of all, and uncreated, is the one who gets to pick the punishments for the crime, and you don’t get to morally grandstand with him. God’s standards are perfect, and we unfortunately are not. Thankfully, Christ has paid for our sins. And you know who Christ is? God. 22. If God wants you to have something you will get it. Obviously those who stick with the faith whilst living a poorer life should be rewarded in heaven greater than those born with a silver spoon. And is it really so wrong to share with the poor? (I’m busting your chops I’m well aware that this is a strawman, kind of like your whole schtick on faith and logic) And there’s a difference between riches YOU earned, and riches that God gave you. If you’ve earned something, it’s good to share it with those in need, but if God specifically wants you to have something then you can enjoy it to yourself. 23. I still think that on paper communism is awesome, especially here where it worked. But it is unfortunate that most communist governments crash and burn. Like the great atheist Soviet Union! R.I.P 1922-1991 24. The curtain didn’t rip before OR after Jesus died, it ripped the very moment he died. There isn’t a correct order for Jesus’ death or the ripping of the curtain to be documented, since they happened at the same time. 25. There were two events where Jesus had a fancy robe thrown on him. Notice how in Luke it says that Jesus was sent back to Pilate, but in John and Matthew it is indicated that the robing event took place in the “Praetorium” which is where Pilate was. 26. It’s important to note the different styles of writing Matthew and Mark used while writing their gospels, Mark told his gospel chronologically mostly, and Matthew told his topically mostly. Matthew simply didn’t write this story chronologically, but layer out the details of that day out of order. I must also add that Matthew never explicitly said that Jesus cursed the fig tree on the day following the cleansing of the temple, he only says “in the morning as he returned to the city.” (21:18) 27. It is possible that the prostitutes were foreigners, so the law wouldn’t have applied to them. 28. It is important to note that Luke mentions that the census to which he is referring is the first census taken while Quirinius was governing. This seems to indicate that at the time of writing, the readers would need to distinguish between multiple censuses. Luke specifies that this was the first one. Also, the term used for the ruling of Quirinius in Luke is not specific to a certain position. So, it's quite possible that he held one position at first and then was promoted to the specific position of governor and performed a census then as well. 29. Again, Matthew didn’t always write his gospel in the correct chronological order. 30. Yes, Judas initially died via hanging, but the rope probably broke, or maybe the branch it was hanging off of, and then Judas’ corpse fell from the tree and burst open. 31. No contradiction here! Kinda weird you put it in a video about contradictions in the Bible but okay, maybe you’ve had a change of heart! And I’m happy you have! Welp, I’m done with this now. Honestly I’m glad you made this video, even if you have led millions astray by twisting scripture. It has been such a wonderful exercise of my faith, and now I am a much stronger Christian leaving this project than when I started in November(?) and I thank you.

I responded to the whole thing, I copy pasted my response for you.

@@Devout214 The responses are very good, appreciate your effort. This is how we have to contend for our faith.

Bible is an incredibly disjointed collection of writings that were never meant to be a single book with a consistent logic anyway.

Torcher Void i just blame the vatican tbh, they burned a bunch of books man

@@RenegadeStriker7 it's been contradictory since long before the vatican, brother. For example, the gospel of mark was written in 40 a.d., the others followed in like 70 a.d, 80 a.d and around there.

Jesus isnt canon

+The Block Wizard 1) Micah - God forgives those that ask for forgiveness Jeremiah - God has everlasting anger that is represented by the burning fires of hell 2) James - God doesn't tempt people Genesis - God tested Abraham by telling him to kill his son (this isn't temptation) 3) Matthew - Jesus said this because before his death, there was no other way into heaven. Galatians - After Jesus died, there became a new way to enter heaven Don't be so easily fooled. Tell me if there were any actually hard ones to debunk. Takes about 30 secs.

cool goggles kid ayyyyyy guren lagan

@@suuvuu you mean the best anime of all time

@@shady8045 ayyyyyyyyyyyy

comedy is added to this video to cover up for it's badly done research ....author didn't even bother to check the original languages ...this is laughable , there are zero contradictions in the bible. IF you think there are let me take a look because there are none ....I'll wait

@@AutotuneSucksBalls watch the video you anti science washup also heres another truth bomb infidels.org/library/modern/donald_morgan/contradictions.html

For me, the best cure for atheism was reading the Bible lmao. It goes both ways

@@sirllamaiii9708 get well soon

That's why the bible was kept in latin for so long. The plebs don't need to know what the corrupt priests of the last 2000 years actually changed in the bible!

@@sirllamaiii9708 A true dichotomy lol

If you already go to read the bible with the mind to disprove it or criticise it then you will achieve it. The bible requires deep study and even sometimes requires us to go back and see what hebrew or greek words were used because there are flaws in english translation that don't fully bring across concepts or puns that the hebrew or greek do. It must be carefully considered but as I say if you go into it with the mind to already condemn it then you won't go as far.

Jesus died for us all! Have a wonderful day! (The Holy Trinity is the truth) 1. Context is KEY. Gods anger burns forever against sin ITSELF, but God will forgive and pardon man for their sins. 2. God wasn’t tempting Abraham, he was testing his faith, to see if he was devout enough to lead his people. 3. These aren’t contradictory, but complementary. Paul says that you are only saved by faith and faith alone, Jesus explains that if you truly have faith in him, you would follow his commandments, and James goes in to further detail about what Faith is. 4. The Holy Trinity is complex, but the face you can’t see is The Father’s, and the face you can see is The Son’s (Jesus.) 5. Gods happy about the burnt offerings, but he’s really happy about your obedience to him. What good is buying someone a gift if you don’t respect them? The gift is empty that’s what it is, devoid of love or emotion. Just like burnt offerings were without obedience. (There’s no need for burnt offerings anymore though) 6. I’m not even sure what you mean by this, but God created everything, even those who do evil, but that doesn’t mean that God wants evil. 7. Hard to explain this, so let me visualize it for you. /spawn human(s) /spawn animal(s) /rank: (Human>Animal=true) 8. The men may have heard the voice of the lord, but Paul didn’t know that, being preoccupied with blindness and knowledge of the lord, so he makes a mistake and says later that they didn’t hear him. Acts wasn’t written by Paul, so it’s possible the correct information came about to the author, and the author just told it as it was, but telling the correct story in the chapter that tells Paul’s encounter as it happened, not Paul’s recount of the encounter in a speech he gave later on. 9. 2 Peter 3:10 doesn’t say the earth will be totally destroyed, havoc will just be wreaked upon it to cleanse its sin. The Earth will turn into a paradise once the rapture is over, Revelation 21. 10. John 3:13 means that nobody has ever returned from heaven, not that nobody has ever gone there. 11. Deuteronomy 5:9 refers to children who continue in their parents footsteps in disobedience to God. 12. Tired as in he is sick and tired of bearing our sin. And again, this is the lord complaining about humans disrespecting him, he isn’t actually tired. 13. This discrepancy involves the difference in who was included in each report. In the report in 2 Samuel, the number of men of valor who drew the sword was 800,000, but did not include the standing army of 288,000 described in 1 Chronicles 27:1-15, or the 12,000 specifically attached to Jerusalem described in 2 Chronicles 1:14. Including these figures gives the grand total of 1,100,000 men of valor who composed the entire army of the men of Israel. The figure of 470,000 in 1 Chronicles 21 did not include the 30,000 men of the standing army of Judah mentioned in 2 Samuel 6:1. This is evident from the fact that the Chronicler points out that Joab did not complete the counting of the men of Judah (1 Chron. 21:6). Both calculations are correct according to the groups which were included and excluded from each report. 14. This is undoubtedly a copyist error. Probably an early copyist inadvertently omitted the word “chariot” that we find supplied in some translations. This in turn created a problem for a later copyist who would have recognized that it was not proper Hebrew structure to write “one thousand seven thousand horsemen,” so he would have reduced the second “thousand” to “hundred” resulting in the reading we now have in 2 Samuel 8:4. It is probably the 1 Chronicles passage that retains the correct number. 15. These texts are often used to challenge the inerrancy and authority of the Scriptures. As shown above they pose two problems to the reader: (1) Who owned the land, Araunah or Ornan? (2) How much did David pay him? In response to the first question, there are numerous possibilities. For instance, it is possible that Ornan also went by the name Araunah. Having and being called by more than one name was common in that day as it is today as well. It is also possible that Araunah is a title rather than a proper name. Also, if Araunah wasn’t a Hebrew but rather a Canaanite, when his name was translated into Hebrew this could have resulted in some variation of spelling. Strong’s Lexicon (#728), identifies Araunah as an "orthographical variation" of Ornan. These are each reasonable explanations. So, I don’t observe a discrepancy in the text. As to the second, there’s a lot of difference between 50 shekels of silver (2 Sam. 24:24) and 600 of gold (1 Chron. 21:24-25). Any CPA looking at a ledger would immediately see these differences. However, there is no discrepancy. 1 Chronicles 21:1 states, "Then David said, 'Here shall be the house of the Lord God and here the altar of burnt offering for Israel.'" While the smaller 50 shekels of silver refers to only the threshing floor itself, the 600-gold figure included the land surrounding the threshing floor for "the house of the Lord God" - a rather large piece of property (cf. 2 Chron. 3:3-4). The figure may also have included the land for Solomon’s future palace and numerous other buildings referred to in 1 Kings 7-8 as well. So, once again there is no discrepancy in the text. 16. Chronicles 11 was compiled earlier in David’s career, and 2 Samuel 23 was compiled towards the end of David’s career. The mighty man just beat his record, no contradiction here. 17. The Good Thief reviled Jesus in an earlier part of the crucifixion, but later came around. 18. this isn’t really contradictory, but complimentary. Neither of these verses say that there was only one or two blind men, Matthew just reveals more information that there was two blind men that Jesus healed. 19. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are all written in very different ways. Matthew presents his material topically, not chronologically. Mark is usually very brief or ignores a great amount of information. Luke is the most complete and presents his material in a chronological order. The gospel of John is not as brief as Mark and is less complete than Luke. But like before, these verses are not contradictory, but complementary. None of them openly say that there was only one man/angel or two men/angels, and that they were or weren’t causing an earthquake. 20. Again, not contradictory, but complimentary. 21. God, Infinite and all knowing, creator of all, and uncreated, is the one who gets to pick the punishments for the crime, and you don’t get to morally grandstand with him. God’s standards are perfect, and we unfortunately are not. Thankfully, Christ has paid for our sins. And you know who Christ is? God. 22. If God wants you to have something you will get it. Obviously those who stick with the faith whilst living a poorer life should be rewarded in heaven greater than those born with a silver spoon. And is it really so wrong to share with the poor? (I’m busting your chops I’m well aware that this is a strawman, kind of like your whole schtick on faith and logic) And there’s a difference between riches YOU earned, and riches that God gave you. If you’ve earned something, it’s good to share it with those in need, but if God specifically wants you to have something then you can enjoy it to yourself. 23. I still think that on paper communism is awesome, especially here where it worked. But it is unfortunate that most communist governments crash and burn. Like the great atheist Soviet Union! R.I.P 1922-1991 24. The curtain didn’t rip before OR after Jesus died, it ripped the very moment he died. There isn’t a correct order for Jesus’ death or the ripping of the curtain to be documented, since they happened at the same time. 25. There were two events where Jesus had a fancy robe thrown on him. Notice how in Luke it says that Jesus was sent back to Pilate, but in John and Matthew it is indicated that the robing event took place in the “Praetorium” which is where Pilate was. 26. It’s important to note the different styles of writing Matthew and Mark used while writing their gospels, Mark told his gospel chronologically mostly, and Matthew told his topically mostly. Matthew simply didn’t write this story chronologically, but layer out the details of that day out of order. I must also add that Matthew never explicitly said that Jesus cursed the fig tree on the day following the cleansing of the temple, he only says “in the morning as he returned to the city.” (21:18) 27. It is possible that the prostitutes were foreigners, so the law wouldn’t have applied to them. 28. It is important to note that Luke mentions that the census to which he is referring is the first census taken while Quirinius was governing. This seems to indicate that at the time of writing, the readers would need to distinguish between multiple censuses. Luke specifies that this was the first one. Also, the term used for the ruling of Quirinius in Luke is not specific to a certain position. So, it's quite possible that he held one position at first and then was promoted to the specific position of governor and performed a census then as well. 29. Again, Matthew didn’t always write his gospel in the correct chronological order. 30. Yes, Judas initially died via hanging, but the rope probably broke, or maybe the branch it was hanging off of, and then Judas’ corpse fell from the tree and burst open. 31. No contradiction here! Kinda weird you put it in a video about contradictions in the Bible but okay, maybe you’ve had a change of heart! And I’m happy you have! Welp, I’m done with this now. Honestly I’m glad you made this video, even if you have led millions astray by twisting scripture. It has been such a wonderful exercise of my faith, and now I am a much stronger Christian leaving this project than when I started in November(?) and I thank you.

I copy pasted my entire response to this video for you.

Ryan 317 HA

lol "all of the above"

Ngl I spat my drink

Christian: so is A correct or B correct? Bible: YES

@@kugelblitzingularity304 CORRECT!

what? that doesnt mean that its right

leun what? 🗿

@@leun6768 That means it's consciously written in a way that you can pick whatever answer you want, you need only to search the right sentence authorizing your preferred solution. Which pretty much makes it impossible to be a book of divine wisdom as such trickery is more the style of fallible humans ;-) You even can use the bible to "prove" that life ends with death and souls do not live on, that is also ascertained in some parts of its text...

@@Ugly_German_Truths bible scholar and teacher here .....can you prove this statement?? "You even can use the bible to "prove" that life ends with death and souls do not live on, that is also ascertained in some parts of its text..." if so let me see it....I can prove to you that life doesn't end with death (from the bible) but I'd like to see your proof ...thanks

@@AutotuneSucksBalls I wanted to look for the various quotes (mostly later works of the oT like the minor prophets IIRC) i know from the time i still cared for the bible somewhat, 15 or so years ago, but the wikipedia article is already chockful with direct quotes of actual christian scholars about the subject: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_mortalism#Modern_scholarship seems a lot of your colleagues are in consensus that the bible does not even overwhelmingly talk for an immortal soul but that that is all later doctrine and NOT based on the scriptures! And you would hardly be able to call a source like Blackwell's radical or anti-theistic ^_^ Did not see that coming ;-)

People still argue and that is still so funny to me that people are not actually stupid but actively choose to be 😂😂

@@calebkipseger2765 you literally explained religion with one phrase

These verses don’t even say what he said they did. He paraphrased them in the most misleading way possible while leaving out any context. Almost all of these verses explain themselves, or have context that explains it. Like when he said God fainted when the scripture actually said he rested, to make it look like it contradicts Isaiah saying God doesn’t faint.

@@bobbobb4804 I MAKE SAD EXCUSES FOR MAGIC FAIRY TALES TOO. BECAUSE SCIENCE AND REALITY IS TOO HARD FOR ME TO UNDERSTAND. I KNOW THEY'RE REAL ♪♫♬ *BECAUSE MY BIBLE TELLS ME SO* ♪♫♬

@@bobbobb4804 CONTEXT!!!

Ham =black?

​@@brotherdave2591 why does that matter, moron

I too like it, but likely for different reasons. See that he was using old versus new testament; the before and after some things were changed. Or even how some parts were being misrepresented; sometimes out of confusion. Like God's tempt to Abraham has a different definition than what they wanted here, to tempt is to test in that context not entice. God will tempt (test) man but not tempt (entice) them to do evil.

dude, something that I am supposed to believe in and put all my life into should not contradict AT ALL, doesn't matter if it's "old" or "new" It is still your "holy book" and both were made WAAAY before modern people, so why believe either if the contradictions are THERE

@@CareyOnShipmate lol .. Atheists are so small minded they think everything is black and white. How about using a little bit of your big brain there bud, and consider what is written? Jesus said the way to God is through him. That means the NT is the new law. But since you don't actually want to learn, you just want to destroy, go ahead and keep your mind closed.

@@thundabird I guess ten commandments are out of the window then? Or are we allowed to pick and keep stuff we like? Also, does that mean the OT stories are no longer to be considered true?

christain are the best at cherry picking

D E E P

A S F U C C

bro no joke i'm 8 and this is very deep 😩👌

@@patrickmahomes3616 why thank you

Woah

That's nice! :D

Comedy is the best form of social dialogue imo.

This is very true

define far right

@@yourmum69_420 far to the right

Most influential books were banned in history

With God, it seems the correct answer is always, "Death!"

@@viddorklol

Well, I'm not a Christian but what about killing in the name of democracy, "the free world", colonialism, communism, nationalism, nazism , fascism, imperialism and any other non-religious ism? I'm sure millions upon millions of their victims aren't very "happy" for being put to death by non-religious parties

@@fb3798 That is humanity for you. But at least (some of) the ones you mentioned do not do that with the order of their god.

@@MnyFrNthng No, that's hipocricy. How about looking at it differently: some (not of them) didn't do anything near to that cause their god told them not to.

i bet the bible is just some 2000 year old work of some 13 year old girls

I think you'll find that the bible was made by a number of people years apart from one another, so it's actually a good example of when a group of people don't listen to their team leader.

What do you mean 'fanfiction'?" It's a fantasy book written by an author who used the acronym GOD instead of their full name. Duh! And they hired other people to write their book for them because… you know. Old times, rich people hire less rich people to write for them…

@@yeew1986 GOD stands for Grey Old Dogg. the most gangsta nigga in tze while hood of jerusalem

@@dave2.077 I like the name Get Off to Death. It has a nice ring to it.

Really brings into question on if an omniscient person can change

He’s literally the same God, there’s much violence, and forgiveness in both the old and new testaments.

God's character arc

Yahweh literally changed all his behaviour, maybe even his own name (Jesus never pronounced or mentioned the tetragrammaton, only "the Father") @@bobbobb4804

​@@bobbobb4804 Why would you make that your pfp?

Some even dissed eachother while translating the othera

@@MiloTheCrotonian so the og youtube disstrack

It was .. Its a group of book composed into a book by the universal church

@@MiloTheCrotonian Nope

If that’s what you say, then the Bible itself is unreliable and is completely uncredited

John 15:12-17 “My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you. Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends. You are my friends if you do what I command. I no longer call you servants, because a servant does not know his master’s business. Instead, I have called you friends, for everything that I learned from my Father I have made known to you. You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you so that you might go and bear fruit-fruit that will last-and so that whatever you ask in my name the Father will give you. This is my command: Love each other” "Love each another". After speaking of love, Jesus deals with the hatred of those who reject the Word of God and who reject his disciples. He foretells that the world will hate and persecute Christians just as it hated and persecuted Himself. The world will be hostile to Jesus and consequently it will also hate those who live in his teaching. Jesus therefore gives another teaching: the tribulations and persecutions to which they will be subject must not frighten them since they, strong in their faith, know that Christ, who has conquered the world, is in them. Jesus' friends are not left alone in persecutions and painful circumstances: they must know that the Defender will be beside them, the Spirit of truth who gave witness to Jesus, will also give it to them. But even the disciples living the very life of Christ will be an uninterrupted witness of his works. In fact, the Spirit, sent by the Father through the Son, will be the "soul" of the Church. Jesus said: You are Peter and on this rock I will build my Church. A Holy Catholic, Apostolic Church.

@@one8951 Sure, ignore all the genocide and eternal torture that is espoused by your deity. Your argument/defense is only as strong as its weakest link.

@@GuitarDog_atx Matthew 25:34-46 “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’ “Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’ “The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’ “Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’ “They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’ “He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’ “Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.”

@@one8951 I know what your theology teaches. Thanks for proving my point. It's disgusting.

@@one8951 The sheep to the slaughter are not tricked by the wolf in the wilderness that hungers to bathe in its blood, but by the shepherd that cares for the sheep only to be used as a means to an end. The silence of the lambs is a blessing not to the lambs, but to the fleecer and butcher. Man is wolf to man.

The devil will always use the bible to oppose God. That is because the reader's mind is already possessed by the enemy. But when you allow Jesus and the Holy Spirit be in you, there is no 'contradiction' because you are understanding the word from God, not from your own understanding where the enemy can easily possess if you do not have God within you. Hope you have a nice day!

@@doralmm Then why has it got any loose ends or omissions or ambiguities? Some of them quite, quite DANGEROUS? How WAS Leviticus 25:46, Matthew 27:25, the Curse of Ham, and Numbers 31:17, and 1 Corinthians 2:14, MEAN'T to be interpreted, for instance, and how to be SURE of having rightly done so? If the Spirit is needed to even READ correctly, and not all churches will guarantee access to the Spirit?

chris sonofpear1 That’s impossible! If you question the bible at all, Satan has already consumed you and you are going to hell! Enjoy burning eternally!

@@notbad2400 What, that there are confusing parts or seeming omissions? How would you address that to a Jew, anyway? And humans can't see Satan or YHWH, so how do they know which bits of nature were made by who?

@@notbad2400 "if you question the bible at all" sounds like a cult ngl.

this is probably the best comment on this video

oh fucking shit, god is real boys

Or the concept of doublethink in 1984 (book). Or both at the same time

iT's a wave AND a particle!

I was thinking: Could god be a quantum entity? Hence being able to be everywhere and anywhere. Knowing everything. Plus not being able to see him but also being able to see him? So like you see him but your mind just doesnt comprehend what you are seeing? Then bringing Jesus back from the dead because he is both dead and alive or perhaps due to being part quantum? This is probably complete nonsense, but i like thinking about this sort of thing.

Helped me greatly

Funniest comment I've seen here

Pretty sure trivia game shows are eternal.

@@dustindusterooni3601I’ve seen some funnier ones, but they’re diluted by a fair amount of sad/disappointing.

@@oberonpanopticon Correct! Trivia game shows are both Eternal and Temperary

Holy shit this is perfect. Hopefully one day they can play this video in schools once christianity is just a forgotten mythology like the others.

It's not so much a contradiction as it is choice. Kinda like the real World situations.

CORRECT

Two words: September clues

LOL, niiice

contradiction are my biggest pet peeve

Are Jesus and God both one and the same? "Yes." "No." *Correct*

Damien Evermore my dad (who was raised Christian but became atheist) told me that he was taught that Jesus was essentially god in human form on earth, but I've heard from other sources that they are two different entities. So they must both be true!

I think the Bible says that he is part of god yet he is the son of god soooo *sweet home Alabama starts playing*

@@Tote_Mich He's the word of God so he's not the father but he is in oneness with him same as your voice is a part of you but is not you he became flesh and was born of a virgin which made him 100% human but because he's still God he's 100% God it's a hard thing to understand and harder to explain if you're a believer ask the spirit to give you discernment in the topic if not you'll never actually understand what this means

@@huonsmith there's an issue there you cannot be raised Christian as it's a relationship with God through Christ you can be raised in the teachings but if you don't have a relationship with him you can never truly know he exist people who were once Christian but aren't any longer usually turn away for 1 of 3 reasons 1) They never actually in their hearts and in their words believed he is who he said he is 2) They never listened to the Spirit and it was just a religion to them 3) It was too hard for them so they chose to live in sin rather than depart from it. Not that I have anything against anyone who lives in sin to each his own it's not my place to judge just inform

_so many blatant examples of contradiction_ There is not a single contradiction in the Bible. The author of this video is an unhinged proven liar who plugs his ears every time you challenge him, and absolutely refuses to provide evidence for a single claim he makes. He can only misdirect and come up with outrageous excuses (more lies) like it would take too long to provide evidence rofl. There are several youtube videos debunking this one you should look into them.

@@morganfreeman1906 trash bait. act more dumb next time if you want an actual response.

68u9iuyo7ugjgfvgkkhgkjgjkgkg bible is fake@@morganfreeman1906

Yes. This book. Written by a ton of people contractdicts. Therfor it wrong. It bad. It stoopid.

@@AsianAnticsOfficial It wrong because it no have proof. And has claims we already prove wrong. Thinkin hard

Loads of "books" of the Bible were discarded. It's funny that different sects believe that a different number of books as canon. Christianity is so confusing and difficult to believe in, even believers can't agree on what's going on.

There are multiple fandoms. I don't think the author has given any hints about their own preference on the matter, and as Nietzsche said, author is dead anyway

Joni Hanski lmao

Awe man I hated it when they decided to make the New Testament canon, the Old Testament was way better

There's way too much filler though.

Nah fam, no contradictions in the video mrtallnazarene.wordpress.com/2017/09/07/refuting-nonstampcollector-and-quiz-show-bible-contradictions-the-bible-does-not-have-contradictions/

The problem with that very long post is that it doesn't adequately address or refute the explanation of: "well maybe it just got written down wrong or something".

NonStampCollector All of your arguments are being addressed, and they are all refuted in the article, before I even read the article I could see that the verses you showed doesn’t contradict themselves. If you do some actual examination on the what the verses teach you would understand.

Maybe they just got written down wrong or something. And you know what, from a criticil historical perspective, we KNOW that they did. So there's that. It never seems to be addressed.

SeraphimsAndAngels sorry mate, but the article yourself presented newer contradictions that I myself can find and point out. Too many contradictions are in the bible. For example: GE 1:3-5 On the first day, God created light, then separated light and darkness. GE 1:14-19 The sun (which separates night and day) wasn't created until the fourth day. GE 1:11-12, 26-27 Trees were created before man was created. 
GE 2:4-9 Man was created before trees were created. GE 1:20-21, 26-27 Birds were created before man was created. 
GE 2:7, 19 Man was created before birds were created. GE 1:24-27 Animals were created before man was created. 
GE 2:7, 19 Man was created before animals were created. GE 1:26 Man is to have dominion over fish, birds, cattle, and all wild animals, yet-- 
GE 2:15-17 It is wrong to be able to tell good from evil, right from wrong. GE 1:26-27 Man and woman were created at the same time. 
GE 2:7, 21-22 Man was created first, woman sometime later. GE 1:28 God encourages reproduction. 
LE 12:1-8 God requires purification rites following childbirth which, in effect, makes childbirth a sin. (Note: The period for purification following the birth of a daughter is twice that for a son.) GE 1:31 God was pleased with his creation. 
GE 6:5-6 God was not pleased with his creation. 
(Note: That God should be displeased is inconsistent with the concept of omniscience as well as with the fact that God allegedly does not change his mind: NU 23:19-20, 1SA 15:29, JA 1:17.) GE 2:4, 4:26, 12:8, 22:14-16, 26:25 God was already known as "the Lord" (Jahveh or Jehovah) much earlier than the time of Moses. EX 6:2-3 God was first known as "the Lord" (Jahveh or Jehovah) at the time of the Egyptian Bondage, during the life of Moses. GE 2:17 Adam was to die the very day that he ate the forbidden fruit. 
GE 5:5 Adam lived 930 years. GE 2:15-17, 3:4-6 It is wrong to want to be able to tell good from evil. 
HE 5:13-14 It is immature to be unable to tell good from evil. GE 4:4-5 God prefers Abel's offering and has no regard for Cain's. 
2CH 19:7, AC 10:34, RO 2:11 God shows no partiality. He treats all alike. GE 4:9 God asks Cain where his brother Able is. 1SA 8:2-22 Samuel informs God as to what he has heard from others
PR 15:3, JE 16:17, 23:24-25, HE 4:13 God is everywhere. He sees everything. Nothing is hidden from his view. GE 4:15, DT 32:19-27, IS 34:8 God is a vengeful god. 
EX 15:3, IS 42:13, HE 12:29God is a warrior. God is a consuming fire. 
EX 20:5, 34:14, DT 4:24, 5:9, 6:15, 29:20, 32:21 God is a jealous god. 
LE 26:7-8, NU 31:17-18, DT 20:16-17, JS 10:40, JG 14:19, EZ 9:5-7 The Spirit of God is (sometimes) murder and killing. 
NU 25:3-4, DT 6:15, 9:7-8, 29:20, 32:21, PS 7:11, 78:49, JE 4:8, 17:4, 32:30-31, ZP 2:2 God is angry. His anger is sometimes fierce. 
2SA 22:7-8 (KJV) "I called to the Lord; ... he heard my voice; ... The earth trembled and quaked, ... because he was angry. Smoke came from his nostrils. Consuming fire came from his mouth, burning coals blazed out of it." 
EZ 6:12, NA 1:2, 6 God is jealous and furious. He reserves wrath for, and takes revenge on, his enemies. "... who can abide in the fierceness of his anger? His fury is poured out like fire, and rocks are thrown down by him." 
2CO 13:11, 14, 1JN 4:8, 16God is love. 
GA 5:22-23 The fruit of the Spirit of God is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control. GE 4:16 Cain went away (or out) from the presence of the Lord. 
JE 23:23-24 A man cannot hide from God. God fills heaven and earth. GE 6:3 The Lord said, "My spirit will not be in man forever, for he is only flesh; so the days of his life will be a hundred and twenty years." 
GE 9:29 Noah lived nine hnndred and fifty years. GE 6:4 There were Nephilim (giants) before the Flood. 
GE 7:21 All creatures other than Noah and his clan were annihilated by the Flood. 
NU 13:33 There were Nephilim after the Flood. GE 6:6. EX 32:14, NU 14:20, 1SA 15:35, 2SA 24:16 God does change his mind. 
NU 23:19-20, 1SA 15:29, JA 1:17 God does not change his mind. GE 6:19-22, 7:8-9, 7:14-16Two of each kind are to be taken, and are taken, aboard Noah's Ark. 
GE 7:2-5 Seven pairs of some kinds are to be taken, and are taken, aboard the Ark. GE 7:1 Noah was righteous. 
JB 1:1,8, JB 2:3 Job was righteous. 
LK 1:6 Zechariah and Elizabeth were righteous. 
JA 5:16 Some men are righteous, (which makes their prayers effective). 
1JN 3:6-9 Christians become righteous (or else they are not really Christians). 
RO 3:10, 3:23, 1JN 1:8-10No one was or is righteous. GE 7:7 Noah and his clan enter the Ark. 
GE 7:13 They enter the Ark (again?). GE 11:7-9 God sows discord.
PR 6:16-19 God hates anyone who sows discord. GE 11:9 At Babel, the Lord confused the language of the whole world. 
1CO 14:33 Paul says that God is not the author of confusion. GE 11:12 Arpachshad [Arphaxad] was the father of Shelah. 
LK 3:35-36 Cainan was the father of Shelah. Arpachshad was the grandfather of Shelah. GE 11:26 Terah was 70 years old when his son Abram was born. 
GE 11:32 Terah was 205 years old when he died (making Abram 135 at the time). 
GE 12:4, AC 7:4 Abram was 75 when he left Haran. This was after Terah died. Thus, Terah could have been no more than 145 when he died; or Abram was only 75 years old after he had lived 135 years.

OK. Hold up. In the back of my mind, for some years, has been the idea of a series of short videos of "bonus rounds" following the Quiz Show video. I.... uhhhhh... think you just wrote the script for one. This is awkward.

WHAT💀 Im an atheist, who's never read the Bible and I just don't understand HOW CAN CHRISTIANS BE OKAY WITH THIS😭

Don't forget that you also marry the virgin.

@@NonStampCollector LETS GOOOOO NONSTAMPCOLLECTOR BIBLE GAME SHOW RETURNS!!!!

66 to 83 books, in fact.

There are half a dozen videos debunking this dishonest video

@@morganfreeman1906 i'd like to see them lmfao

More like when you misquote the books.

@@zPigg You could’ve looked them up. Personally I just actually read the verses. All this video did was misquote and take the context out of a bunch of verses he copypasted from some atheist website. Jeremiah 17:4 Didn’t say God’s anger towards Judah will last forever. The fire lasts forever and is the consequence, but God’s anger doesn’t last forever. Genesis 22:1 Doesn’t say God tempted Abraham, it says God tested him. You cannot work yourself into heaven, but faith without works is dead, and you’ll find this in James 2:26. Jacob saw God in a dream. Genesis 12 says God “appeared” himself to Abraham, which he does many ways, and he didn’t physically show himself. Exodus 33:11 said Moses spoke to God face to face, not that he saw God face to face, and just right after that verse Exodus 33:23 says “Then I will take away My hand, and you shall see My back; but My face shall not be seen.”. A human being in the flesh could not be able to look at God’s face with their eyes. Neither Jeremiah 7:22 or Exodus 20:24 say God does or doesn’t delight in burnt offerings. Exodus 20:24 instructs the Israelites to do it, and Jeremiah 7:22 says they temporarily didn’t have to do it while they were fleeing Egypt. That’s not a contradiction. God brought all things into existence, including things that are evil. But God himself is Good. Also 1 John 4:8 seems to be a random verse you put. God created the animals first, and then the Humans. Genesis 2:18-19, starts with God saying man should not be made to be alone, and then God creates the animals. Genesis 1:25-27 talks about God creating the animals, and then finally creating the humans. There is no contradiction. Acts 9:7 says they heard it, but Acts 22:9 says they didn’t understand it. That’s no contradiction. 2 Peter 3:10 says the earth will be burnt, not that it will stop existing. So it doesn’t contradict Ecclesiastes 1:4. John 3:13, and 2 kings 2:11 don’t contradict each other, as Jesus miraculously ascended himself into heaven, but Elijah was taken up to heaven by gust of wind. Isaiah 40:28 says that God doesn’t faint, not that he doesn’t rest. So it doesn’t contradict Isaiah 1:14, and Isaiah 43:24. Deuteronomy 5:9 and Deuteronomy 24:16 don’t contradict each other, because Deuteronomy 5:9 refers to the descendants that kept their behavior. Isaiah 40:28 doesn't say God never rests, it says he never faints. Isaiah 1:14, Isaiah 40:28, and Isaiah 43:24 don't contradict each other. Also Isaiah 1:14 and Isaiah 43:24 don't refer to physical weariness. II Kings 25:8-9 says he came unto Jerusalem, and Jeremiah 52:12-13 says he came into Jerusalem. They don't contradict each other. 2 Samuel 24:9 didn’t talk about the soldiers in the already standing army. While 1 chronicles 21:5 talked about all the men who took up their sword. David took 7000 horsemen. 2 Samuel 8:4 only says 700 in some translations because it's a copyist error in the Masoretic text, but the much older Septuagint and dead sea scrolls have it written as 7000. 1 Chronicles 21:25, 2 Samuel 24:24 don't contradict each other. 1 Chronicles 21:25 says he paid 600 shekels for the floor, and 2 Samuel 24:24 says he paid 50 shekels for oxen. 2 Samuel 23:8 and 1 Chronicles 11:11 don't contradict each other, They are talking about different events. Luke 23:39-42, Mark 15:32, and Matthew 27:44 don't contradict each other. Luke 23:39-42 quotes one of the thieves, but it doesn't say there wasn't a second one. Mark 10:46-52, Matthew 20:30 don't contradict each other. Matthew 20:30 just brings up another person. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John don't contradict each other on the crucifixion of Christ. They told their perspectives, and what they said didn't contradict what the others said. God is just, but he is also merciful. The veil was torn in two after Jesus breathed his last breath. Matthew 27:50-51, Mark 15:37-8, and Luke 23:45-6 don't contradict each other. Luke described the event in more detail, after saying the veil was torn in two, and he wasn't saying the veil was torn before Jesus's death. In Luke 23:11 Herod's soldiers put a gorgeous robe on Jesus, and in John 19:1-2 Pilates soldiers put a purple robe a Jesus. Matthew 27:27-8 also brings up a different robe. These verses bring up different robes that were put on Jesus at different points in time. Matthew and Mark both said the story of the fig tree happened as they were coming to Jerusalem. There was no contradiction. 1 kings 15:11-12 doesn't even bring up homosexuals, and it doesn't contradict Lev 20:13. Luke 2:1 and Matthew 2:1 don’t contradict each other. Luke 2 doesn’t say Jesus was born at the time of the census. Jesus was born in the days that Herod still reigned. Matthew 28:2 and Luke 24:2 don’t contradict each other. Luke 24:2 is just less detailed. Judas tried to give his money back(Matthew 27:5), but it was unlawful to accept it so they bought a field for Judas (Matthew 27:6-7) where he then hung himself. Acts 1:18 describes the aftermath, and what happened to Judas’s body. There is no contradiction.

Yo wtf he’s still liking comments

what were the other nails if you don’t mind me asking?

I'm a non-believer turned believer. You cannot tell me anything anymore. He wrote it in our hearts. It is also why an atheist/agnostic can behave morally. You'll be lost if you become too invested in the storylines and not the teachings of the Word.

@@stevdarshaki4378 1) eastern philosophy and greek philosophy classes that exposed me to non-christian material that also seemed to be true, or that Christianity didn't have exclusive rights to truth 2) a variation of the brain in the jar thought experiment where if you had no sense organs or ability to experience stimuli, plus no brain cells to retain and access memories or experience emotions than in what way could your soul be considered to still retain any of your personal identity or experience anything after death 3) the problem of evil arguments, which are issues for a personal theistic God but less so for other versions And countless other issues I don't have time to lay down. I think you can reflect on stories in the bible and find metaphorical truths or ironic truths etc but I dont find it literally true or even cohesive.

Ya know, I was there with ya. But why not believe in it. If it's real, you get salvation if you believe but hell if you don't. On the other hand, if it's not real, you are in the ground regardless

I approve of this theory

No.

i spent a few hours to answer all the questions. summary is at the end. 1. how long does God's anger last? answer: that's up to God, if a person repents they are forgiven, if they don't repent they go to hell forever. so his anger is forever and not forever at the same time. it depends on if the person repents. its not contradiction its lack of understanding. 2. does Yahweh tempt people? answer: God doesnt tempt but God allows people to be tempted by satan. God only test people. Abraham sacrificing his child was a test, not a tempt. 3. is a man justified by faith or works or both? answer: a man is justified by faith but faith should lead you into good works. you cannot say you have faith and do bad works then you didn't have faith. faith leads to the good works. 4. has anyone seen God or no one has seen God? answer: when people see God in the old testament they see a vessel of God, like Moses seeing God, but hes seeing a burning bush, or clouds, etc. that is not God, for God is spirit and eyes cannot see God. what they saw is a vessel of God that God spoke through to them. No man hath seen God the Father except the Son of God Jesus Christ. and even the body Jesus had was a vessel he used because he said he existed with the father before coming on earth. 5. does Yahweh delight in burnt offerings? answer: you have to obey him first. the verses are not contradicting, God is telling the people that when he brought their fathers Moses etc out of the land of Egypt he didn't tell them anything concerning burnt offering, but he told them specifically to obey him. the people didnt care about obeying God but they cared about burnt offering. if you read in context its easy to understand. 6. is God the author of evil? answer: what is evil? God would punish people in hell is that evil?. evil is relative. other translations say, God creates calamity. calamity is also like destroying people in sodom and gomorrah by fire, is that evil?. again, evil is relative. when God does something we don't call it evil although it can be a calamity. 7. was humans created before the animals? answer: Genesis 1 is giving you day by day steps. Genesis 2 is not giving you any day by day steps, genesis 2 is giving you different stories together not step by step. the point is, God created humans and animals in one day, there's also possibility he created some animals first, then human second then other animals etc. again, its not an hour by hour to-do list, its a whole day by day what was done in the day. 8. on the road to Damascus did paul's travelling companions hear the voice that spoke to paul? answer: acts 9 : 7 is clear, they heard the voice they couldn't see who spoke. acts 22 : 9, says they didn't understand. some translations write they "heard not". the point is, they heard but they didn't understand. another meaning for "heard not" is inaudible, meaning you're hearing but you cannot get what is being said, like you're listening to another language. imagine you're speaking to a friend and he quickly speaks another language, and you ask him, hey i didn't hear what you said, basically you heard it but you didn't understand and since you didn't understand you think you didn't hear it. in short they heard but didn't understand. 9. will the earth last forever? answer: other verse the author says one generation passes and another comes but the earth would last forever. the author is contrasting the humans passing to the earth always existing. its like saying, generations have come and gone but this earth is always here meaning generations would still come and go and the earth would still be here. the word forever, is actually flexible, it means a long time, example in the bible verse psalm 23 : 6, it says "and i would dwell in the house of the lord forever" does it mean we live in the house of God eternity? no. the author is saying he would be with God till the end of his life on earth. so in short its misunderstanding by people. secondly, some Christians believe there would be a new earth with paradise. so technically the earth would still be for eternity. 10. is Jesus the only man to have ascended to heaven? answer: Jesus was speaking here saying "If I told you earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you heavenly things? No one has ascended into heaven, but He who descended from heaven: the Son of Man." two answers, there is possibility Jesus is telling the people hes speaking to, none of them has ascended to heaven. which is the fact. secondly, Jesus is telling the people, he came down from heaven so he has superior knowledge. no one has ascended to heaven and back with such a knowledge. do you think Jesus doesnt know prophets ascended to heaven? no. context is important.

11. are children to be put to death for the sins of the father? answer: Only God can do that. we are not to put children to death for the sins of the father. but same as God destroyed sodom and gomorrah, likely they had children, meaning the children likely suffered for the sins of their parents. so as moses law, we humans are not to put people to death for the sins of their fathers. 12. does God rest? answer: no. the verses he quoted doesnt say anything about God resting. but there are verses like God resting on the 7th day. it doesnt literally mean he went to rest for energy. it simply means he stopped creation. if you don't work on a day, its considered rest day, but are you really resting if you aren't tired?. no. its simply misunderstanding, applying basic logic to a verse. 13. how many valiant men of soldiers? answer: he took two different books of the bible and expect them to have the same number? lol. should they go to war everyday with the same number of soldiers? such a silly logic. its basically two different stories. 14. how many horse men? answer: same as above. two different stories from different books of the bible. 15. how many shekels? answer: Two different stories. 16. David killed how many men? answer: two different stories. what did they expect? David to only have one war?. such a silly logic. this is hilarious very weak atheist arguments. 17. how many people reviled Jesus on the cross? answer: you're comparing stories of witnesses of an event writing their accounts. one author says, those who were crucified with Jesus were insulting him, another says, One of them was insulting him, meaning the authors heard he was insulted. so they insulted Jesus and one repented later on. 18. how many blind men Jesus healed at Jericho one or two ? answer: Jericho is a city Jesus went frequently, there is possibility its different days or different times of the same day. the logic of the atheist is funny, hes expecting one miracle one event one person. Jesus performed miracles throughout the cities back and forth. 19. how many people visited Jesus tomb? answer: the logic of the question is flawed. when i write a story and say, trump visited india, and another person writes the story and says trump and his son visited india and another person says trump and all his security and his son visited india is it contradictory? no. each author is writing what they think its important to know. you take all together and form the complete story. the gospels are accounts of different authors of the life of Jesus, why would you expect them to copy paste from each other? lol. i really laughed at this question. 20. original designated punishment for fortune telling? answer: death. when Jesus came he brought sin and repentance. that's why when they were about to stone the adulterer Jesus said, he without sin cast the first stone, and Jesus forgave her. but God would still punish fortune tellers with hell which is the second death. 21. hitting your parents? answer: not death. do you think they just killed people for just tapping their parents? be realistic. the verse is regarding people who hit/beat their parents to the extent could cause death. 22. cursing parents? answer: this form of cursing is different from the modern form of cursing where we use swear words. that form of cursing was a spiritual form of cursing using the name of God its similar to spiritism. you can research on this as explained by Jews themselves. you think they're going to kill their kids for saying f*ck you dady?. lol. 23. a person who rejects the verdict of the judge or priest must be put to death? answer: Moses is telling them anyone who doesnt obey the priest or judge appointed by God in the land they are going, the person who disobeys their verdict must be put to death. it was considered contempt of court to disobey the verdict of the judge.

oh my god please no

I believe that God exists outside of time; that He observes it, but that doesn’t mean He directly interferes.

@@DirectorOFun he doesn't have to interfere.. he already knows the outcome of all events before they ever happen. so that's a denial of free will. you don't have the ability to choose if everything you do has already been written before the opportunity arises TO choose. Like for example.. say there's an omnicient being.. and he knows that in an hour someone is going to offer you a choice between a pen and a pencil. He knows that you're going to choose the pencil. He is never wrong. You' MUST choose the pencil over the pen. If you don't.. then that means he is not omniscient and he is fallible. You also do not have the ability to NOT be at the correct place and time to be offered the "choice" between the pen and pencil.. that also means that the person who gives you that "choice" MUST be there at that exact time and place and MUST have both of those items in order for that "choice" to be made... every single action from from every single being, every single atom in existence, must perform, from the time of creation, in a precise way without deviation to lead up to that one singular event of you being given a "choice" between those two items. If any of it is wrong.. if any of it changes... that event cannot happen and therefore there is no omniscient being. So either there is free will... or there is god. Both cannot exist.

@@DirectorOFun And how do you propose that works? Please, fill me in on your god physics. I could use a good laugh.

@@nobody.of.importance I don’t have a straight answer; I just believe that it’s reasonable to assume space, time and matter must have been created by intelligent design, given they can’t exist without each other all at once. With that, said creator must exist “outside” of time, given He can’t depend on His own creation to exist. As for what that looks like, I couldn’t explain it clearly if I tried. Either standpoint requires some sort of leap of faith.

@@nobody.of.importance I've loved most of your responses to ppl so far, but that was just mean :(. I mean it was a genuine attempt to explain their world view. If you really want to help change people's beliefs, don't insult them when they try to explain it. Listen. Nobody fucking listens anymore. I know it's easy to hate, it easy to watch these videos and hate on Christians seeing them as idiots, short-sighted, narrow-minded, but that life is all they have lived in. And then go dunk on them in the comments. Tbh I am exactly the same, I've only lived as an atheist so I'm really just as ignorant. I think I am lucky to be on the side I believe is right, but we have to acknowledge that if we were born on the opposite side, we probably would've been a theist too. It's easy to think otherwise, but the evidence supports this. Please don't be hostile. If we want to be the better people we need to act like it, and instead of showing the hate that Christians have historically shown non-believers and believers of other religions, we should listen, understand, and respectfully disagree instead of insult.

Didn't these humans have God's blessing? How come God just allowed such egregious errors in his sacred text?

@@AdmiralSlothcause we have free will and our lifes are already written in the book of life at the same time!

@@leonardoluizleal4409than the bible can’t be trusted as a reliable religious text. If it’s not the word of god since it was written by people with free will, it’s worthless

Good subs were hard to come by 2000 years ago. Or 1800 years ago.

Its fabricated lmao

Actually he hasn't finished writing it yet. At least, according to the people who are writing his words.

@@raspiankiado4658 so sexist of you to assume that a horrible petty angry devious lying manipulative entity envisioned by similarly horrible people to make sense of their shitty lives must be male

heber moreno Whoever wrote Mark was certainly educated. He wrote in the style of the Ancient Greek Epics. He chose to write in a lower dialect though, so it resonated more with the commoners. It was propaganda, as each of the other three gospels were too.

@pathstowardgodbyfaith.com IS everyone equally loved, then, and did YHWH, or even Jesus, maybe, do JACK SHIT about how Jews and others used to be treated, within Christendom, for centuries?

@@chrissonofpear1384 God clearly states in the Bible that we will go through trials and hard times. It will be all worth it when we get to Heaven.

CONGRATS! here's your 10 points

@@chrissonofpear1384 no everyone is not equally loved everyone who is unsaved is equally loved, by God. Christians are however loved more by him. Just the truth

@@lewis5211 And why is that, and why are some not much guaranteed basic fripping SAFETY within past Christendom, amidst assorted rabid theologies, offshoots and agendas?

Oscar O. *_A L L T H O T S_*

Oscar O. I just gave you 666th like, i guess i'll be going to hell lmao.

Oscar O. no coincidence I saw 666 likes on your comment. (Haha..jk, Im not a religious zealot that thinks you're Satan)

I am resisting the urge to give this comment a like because I don't wanna ruin the number😂

Marian-Remus Gurgu Same 😂

I think you mean C O R R E C T

I'm so fucking tired of seeing shitty comments like this. Do us all a favor, reader, and stop this miasmic bs

@@anthonybatuello6153 you know what's worse than shitty comments? Your comment

@@tomfish3244 kekekek ;*

No

Wild what a decent education has done in reducing the number of religious people in developed countries 😂. Congrats on getting out of the wackiness!

You became an "atheist" because you reject the truth of the Bible, not because you read it. I made another comment for this vid asking anyone "which part" of the video they think is a valid contradiction and I would explain why it isn't a contradiction. Every single person ran away. Every single one. Give a part of the vid with timestamp and explain the "contradiction" ending with "that is a contradiction" and I will explain why it isn't. Good luck.

@@morganfreeman1906 I'll be honest buddy, you're the one making the claim here. If you really want to convence me, tell me which parts of the video you believe are incorrect and I'll give you a response. Trying to reach out to people with anger is not a good way to convert them. As Jesus said "love thy enemy", which was his way of telling the people no one is going to want to hear the good news if its told to them through insults and curses. Empathy is the most essential part of any argument.

@@Samsamhamram also thank you and sorry for not seeing this comment. It was tough and there really is no hate like christian "love" but I managed to realize in the end how much me and people I knew had hurt people and left to become a better person on my own.

@@jargontrueseer You are not being honest. You made the claim "the cracks start to show through" and "bible is dissproven by most of the evidence " Those are claims, I responded with a challenge to your claims regarding the "evidence" of "contradictions." You ran away from it instead of debating the "evidence of contradictions". Simple as. "Trying to reach out to people with anger is not a good way to convert them." I'm not angry. What gave you that idea?

summed up perfectly

+Ace The FireDragon: Well, it is a mix of facts and fiction. The fictional parts are probably written by self deluded people. Perhaps there was a bit of mental illness, such as schizophrenia, involved. If you want to see what religious insanity looks like, look up Robert Tilton, Jonestown, Osho, Peter Popoff, The Australian Jesus, The Mexican Jesus, the Russian Jesus, David Koresh, Bonnie Nettle and Marshal Applewhite (Heaven's gate).....there are plenty. Some of these guys even write books and produce VHS/DVDs and have websites.

louis tournas does Mexican Jesus have a sombrero ?

EXPLANATION - All the contradictions in the Bible 003 - No-one gone to heaven - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/d8h2hJiq267HlY0.html

Jonah Epstein oh that just makes me happy

When your answer is B too many times so you think you did something wrong

@@bjrnfrederiksen6319 Searched through the comments for this one months later just to see this reply again.

@@dinohall2595 damn

This type of comments give me hope, this week I'm starting to volunteer for Recovering from Religion thanks to videos and comments like this, thanks.

What religion did u convert to?

@@brawnizaa1275 Probably atheism.

What made you dismiss the video before you converted?

@@R-H-B Prolly the belief of god itself, growing up with it, and the lessons that not believing in the bible will send you to hell. Prolly.

Phillip Hickman provide evidence supporting your claims please, thanks

Quoting the Bible is not evidence. If one quoted the Quran to you it would not mean anything, and rightly so.

@@degaussingatmosphericcharg575 i am not christian but i am still going to defend him because you request is impossible. YOU CANT PROVE THAT SOMETHING IS WRONG. The burden of proving there point is always with the guy claming something. You just used the same logic of many christians how demand prove that good isnt real

Christians are claiming the bible is the word of a god, with not one piece of evidence for that. The burden is on THEM , not non-Christians. i did not use the same "logic" as theists, since they do NOT use any.

@@degaussingatmosphericcharg575 sry you are right. I want to apologize. I didnt understand the discussion correctly.

@Alex Garcia you should probably read the description instead of just copying and pasting that stuff

@Alex Garcia thank you. I thought I should let you know instead of you making continuing to make a pretty lacking criticism of the video.

But they aren’t in the same book, they are a bunch of different books......

@@denniswilkerson5536 i said some

@@vascanatomy9443 no you said “some” in reference to the amount of contradictions..... not in reference to the amount of existing books, but sorry you are right. I didn’t see your ‘s’ at the end of books before.

So 'whose line is it anyway' lol

Fix, augment, who knows?

Cap

Yes, with the rise of far-right Christianity

@@mbrproductions160 most people are libtard atheists if you're talking about America, a p0rnstar is a speaker at the rnc, chill out dude.

mrtallnazarene.wordpress.com/2017/09/07/refuting-nonstampcollector-and-quiz-show-bible-contradictions-the-bible-does-not-have-contradictions/

For fools.

Farmer Craig Just by reading the first part, it's already contradicting itself: forever does not mean in all of eternity, I can get that. But both verses mention forever, which makes the entire argument invalid.

@@enamelpin628 It is talking about 2 different subjects here. The one in Micah is dealing with people. A one on one stuation. He was prophesying about Jesus and His salvation. Jeremiah is talking about the nation of Israel whose leadrship and people had turned away from God. He told Israel when Solomon was king that as long as they worshipped God that there always would be a king on David's throne. But they didn't last very long. After many generations and the kingdoms not turning and staying with God, He took his anger out on them. Ever since Babylon conquered Israel there has not been a king on the throne.

I just found this and the memeage is way cool.

Passage; noddle 2:15 (am)

Taking the Last slice of pizza? DEATH

Leaving the refrigerator slightly ajar so the cold air let's out DEATH

Moving the driver's seat slightly forward and leave it like that? DEATH

Leaving my door slightly open when you leave DEATH

Except you don’t have to go through any really, and this video is a pretty bad faith argument against Christianity.

@@captainkirk2705How so?

@@captainkirk2705 how so?

@@GodlessCommie Almost every single example he gives is not at all a contradiction except on cherry picked face value, and the video seems to either be ignorant of, or intentionally ignoring genre, historical context, translation decisions and just overall effective reading skills. If you want me to, I'll be happy to go verse by verse in the video and demonstrate this. No one in their right mind thinks a fair way to read any book is to pull out single sentences devoid of context and pit them against one another. Yet that is exactly what he is doing with the Bible. There is also a hefty dose of chronological snobbery in this video and this comment section, as if this is the first time someone has ever critically looked at the Bible, when intellectually honest men and women have been reading the Bible for 2000 years, and most of them spent more time reading, studying, and thinking about JUST the Bible than any us will spend reading in general in our life times. Maybe, just maybe, it's a bit arrogant to assume that men like Aquinas and Augustine were just intellectual frauds who ignored 100's of "contradictions" in the Bible. So yeah, it's an extremely bad faith video. There are plenty of compelling arguments and debates we can have for/against Christianity. This isn't really one of them, and its a low effort attempt that's just looking for easy internet points.

see my reply to GodlessCommie.

Do you even read his comments? He lies constantly and runs away from every challenge. It's pathetic. Basically every single part of his video has been debunked.

"Runs away" = "leaves it to interested and open-minded parties to go look it up for themfuckingselves". Have you even typed "Ebionites" into Google yet, slacker fangirl?

​@@morganfreeman1906 And I haven't seen a single video from ahem...the sources you recommend that debunks the video properly without resorting to one or more logical fallacies Christians typically exhibit. Those close minded people that never learn to open up to differing opinions.

​@@NonStampCollector It's honestly gold how you respond to Morgan here like a champ. Keep it up! 🏆

@@fandroid6491 _without resorting to one or more logical fallacies Christians typically exhibit_ You are a proven liar so please please offer evidence of your claim these videos you *admit you watched* contain "Logical fallacies" You won't. Once again, demonstrating you are a liar.

r/inclusiveor

r/woooosh

@@poolmanander who are you wooshing

Poolmanander yea wtf r u wooshing

Mulțumesc

DaChrisstar yeah. I wonder why that is?

Yeah it was released so long ago but seems to have become quite the cult classic, kinda like Napoleon Dynamite.

Why not? Why does Nikola Tesla get to defend the alternating current against Thomas Edison but not them?

@@aoli8142 r/whoosh

@@corbinmills9335 r/woosh

Seems likely, or maybe he just had DID and AWFUL mood swings.

Well, that’s simply incorrect. You just saw the video. How do you explain that if it’s not contradictions?

@@zeroglitch1310 I have a feeling you either didn't read the entire comment, or else didn't realize I was being facetious 🤔

so this may come across confusing but when sin is talked about in the old testament and when sin is talked about in the new testament are two very different things. You see in the old testament the was no holy spirit and there was no savor thus when someone sinned it was a much bigger thing, it was a crime against the Lord's nation thus they(the people of the God) would judge the crime how every other crime was judged back then, very harshly. In the new testament, however, when "death" is brought up as a result of sin it is referring to spiritual death which, if you haven't excepted the Lord's forgiveness will send you to hell... Another thing to realize is that if a sin from the old testament isn't re-stated in the new it isn't a sin anymore and has been forgiven by the death of Jesus (like cutting your hair, eating pig, braiding your hair etc.)... TL; DR no, Christians are not being told to go out in the street and kill sinners...lmao hope this clears this up :D

@@julianm.1248 can you think of any reason why a moral system which punishes all kinds of fairly innocuous things with death could be problematic?

@Sabir why is it so easy to find contradictions in other holy books but so hard to find them in your own?

@@julianm.1248 Since this was never answered: the problem with overly harsh punishments is that they encourage immoral behaviour, because it becomes necessary to silence witnesses. Someone saw you pick up a stick on the Sabbath? Now you have to kill them.

@@julianm.1248 LOL. Death is punish for every sins🤦🏻‍♂️.Even in NT for gays punish is death...etc. Its not equal to steal something and to kill someone.For both are death

Not much chance of me doing that.

You can still be a theist and not be religious, God doesnt depend on religion.

@@tyler-qr5jn Could you elaborate? An example would be nice

@@tyler-qr5jn you are confusing theism with deism.

@@pedrocarreiras4497 I believe Tyler is saying that you can believe in a god (aka be theist) but not necessarily be tied to a strict dogma/religious denomination/set of beliefs. So basically you could be a spiritual person in general and not identify with a particular religion.

The funniest in all that is he just had to animate the thing and read what was written already, that is the real joke. I start to think that religion is just a joke that got too long.

ClassixSynth 🤩🤩 you’re a genius

Every time he gives another example, it solidifies the joke that much further, and the reality that these old books are full of contradictions and shouldn't be taken seriously. If it was just one or two contradictions, that might be acceptable. The fact that there are this many, is important to show.

And just think... the “Pharisees” and “popes” and all the other “biblical-based politicians” have been running with this joke for over two-thousand years! 🤦🏼‍♂️

10 years*

Almighty God didn't see THAT coming!

@@NonStampCollector I bet she is still bitch'n about it. Y'tube Satan's weapon.

Shows you've really read nothing from ancient theologians, these questions had been handled by torah and the Christian church fathers millenia ago. Most of these supposed "contradictions," when they are actually contradictions at all, were never an issue for believers until protestants tried to remake the Bible into a scientific document, which it never was, and tried to base the veracity of the text on various dry and absurd systematic theological schemes, 1:1 consistent word association games, historical/archeological arguments etc. instead of the simple power of the gospel itself to show people the beauty of what they were created for After leaving atheism in my early 20's coming back to these kinds of videos simply baffle me as to how I was ever so blind as to take them seriously. It shows me that when I originally deconstructed from Christianity in my teens that I never truly knew Christ to begin with

@@papercut7141 explain 1 contradiction from ths video

@@forloop7713 why should I bother? The concept of most of these being "contradictions" that matter in any way isn't even a theological premise that I hold. Like a lot are as pedantic as numbers of soldiers or something, as if the message of scripture is based on that. This all stems from the concept of scripture as some kind of systematic philosophical treatise that has to be able to be run through a logical function or syllogism and come out with zero errors to be valid. Even thinking about the faith in that way is so removed from the gospel and fathers that it's pointless to even debate. Words can be used differently in different contexts, things that seem to contradict logically are often the product of people using limited language to describe something infinite and incomprehensible. This is why the Orthodox understand the place of paradox in Christian teaching as a necessary facet of the work that challenges our minds to enter deeper into the mystery created by it, as the deepest "contradiction" of all is the heart of all Christian knowledge, the chief mystery, that God became man, so that man could become God (St Athanasius), through the crucifixion of Christ, the King who is Servant of all, who finds life through death. As he asks us to "lose our lives, so we may find it" So instead of engaging you in this petty game you want to play, why don't you give me a supposed contradiction and tell me why I should care about it at all? About what relevance it has to the revelation of the infinite God, the ground of all being, which is love, incarnating as man his Son to show us the path of love, mercy, and forgiveness, this grand "contradiction" that I've already found my life in? Show me how any of your petty word games could upstage that and maybe we'll have a conversation worth having

there are tons of videos debunking every single "contradiction" this video implies. Would those make you happy or do you prefer ignorance?

​@@morganfreeman1906 Ah yes. Debunking the contractions in the Bible by interpreting the Bible differently. If you twist something enough it'll have any meaning imaginable. Sometimes it's best to take words at face value because making up a hidden meaning to fit your beliefs is just another way of practicing ignorance. That's the problem with the debunking video's logics.

@@FoxsoFunso The amount of projection in your reply is off the charts. There are no contradictions in the Bible. Not a single one. Every excuse you made is in fact something the video's author does, but you flip it around as a coping mechanism because it's your agenda to make the Bible appear invalid.

@@morganfreeman1906 Know what? There are plenty of things that break my immersion when reading a Bible, but, I suppose I can chalk it up to a personal problem and move on. As fun as cross referencing bibles is... I suppose the only Bible that matters for your argument is THE Bible. Have you read the original Bible or are you just as unreliable as a source as I am? I have never been good at learning new languages despite my effort... Too bad the Bible isn't perfectly understandable. A consequence of the tower of babble and a skill issue on my part.

@@FoxsoFunso lol what desperate deflection. The topic is "contradictions" in the Bible. There are none. And Josepheus mentions Jesus by name. That is "cross reference" If the New Testament was a work of fiction then he would never have known about Jesus.

Hell yeah. Same thing happened for me like 3ish years ago. So happy I was able to get out of the christian bubble I was in for so long

Mark Galera yeah who knows why all of a sudden it’s in my recommended I’ve had this account before this video came out

Mark Galera shocked and disappointed

Yip me too

Wait this came out 8 years ago?

Here is me

To those who say that you can't prove that god dosent exist, well you cant prove that jesus wasnt gay either xD

Yeah he was happy when he was with others

Dude... it was a joke

​@@MeetTheSmythes As there is no direct historical evidence for the existence of Jesus and plenty of indirect evidence(?)(in written sources), I suggest Jesus was probably Illiterate as well as gay

@@MeetTheSmythes also we all know which sources you've used, and they are full of contradictions, which adds fire to my claims