damn.

Mine asked me for a cigarette lit it up in class and asked each and everyone one of us something we love and hate about life

@@justbegoodlitowhy do you feel the need to lie about something so pointless?

@@ToHaveNot misery loves company huh ?

Cause at the end of philosophy it’s just, you exist because you just do

for some time, he was in fact was a nihilist, he followed schopenhauer, that's why after that he affirms life.

I think you mean Nitsh i did not hear him mention Nietzsche

True. He even critiques them on his The Will to Power.

I think he was an ACTIVE nihilist. But his philosophy is really vague, so...

​@@gabrielaloisi He was; and maybe *not* completely nihilistic. I do agree that his philosophies are vague; but I think he's trying to make us ourselves create new values what's best for us, especially a way to *overcome* nihilism, or something... I could be wrong.

😂😂lol

The prescription : watch this one only smoking cigarettes at the end of the night

So true,it starts with thinking about something I said or haven’t done , then slowly but inevitably ,thoughts roll around to how myself,or anything exists, who made god(supposing god exists) and why is there anything. Then,as the morning birds begin to sound off, in a bit of an anxious panic, I manage to nod off .

oh lawd thats relatable @@timofeysafronov4371

​@@tokershark1570 you've reminded me a song Monkeyland by The Chameleons

Taoism got me

As a philosophy major, much of our education was based on reading and not actually speaking these words or names. Many of the writings are translated from German, French, Greek, etc. The only time we ever heard these things spoken was during lectures, and even the professors differed on their pronunciations. My point is that just because you mispronounce a word or name doesn’t mean you misunderstand it.

@@robsutton3092 Nobody has accused him of not understanding. I am German, so this sounds just funny in my ears - though, i don't expect anybody to have a perfect pronunciation. Nevertheless, I've heard many wrong pronunciations but these still came unexpected. An though, I mostly agree with your point, it most definitely changes the impression of the entire text that is given. It is the same with misspelling of words. And tbh, I think a philosophy professor should at least try to get the pronunciation right.

I should not have assumed you were criticizing his understanding of the subject. You were just criticizing him for another form of ignorance. I have done the same thing. You’re right about misspellings, too, though it is easier to perform an automated spellcheck than a pronunciation-check. The mispronunciations in this video were likely due to the fact that he has never or not often heard some of these words and names spoken. The subject matter of philosophy, though underlying and applicable to literally everything, is not a common topic of discussion for most people. Perhaps that should change. As lovers of wisdom, we should be appreciative of attempts at discussing these issues even with mispronunciations.

It’s an AI voice

Happens to the best of us

sisyphilis killed me

Bahahaha, true, it’s rather cute though

Philosophical questions stem from the sort of questions that we can wonder about; we can think about producing something, about doing something or about what thinking itself or about nature. Carpenter thinks about producing or making a chair, engineer about something else, builder about building, etc. this isn't called philosophy but art or carft. We think about what to do and this is different from the thinking about making something( the latter has a product that is in the end of the thought, but the former has an mastered action at the end), such as taking care of our loved ones and this is economic philosophy( because we mainly have to earn money and spend it well. "Economic" in ancient Greek means "household economic"), and taking care of the civil society and this is political philosophy. All these kinds of thought have an ethical aspect to them, and are called moral philosophy. We also think about thinking itself in logic where we consider whether a concept is applicable ( predicable) to something or not, as dog is not applicable to Socrates( as we don't say, "Socates is a dog") but man is( as we say, "Socates is a man"). The signs of concepts, like noun and verb and everything in grammar are also included here. The last part studies nature and this can be studied in many ways. All these divisions of philosophy express the order in one way or the other. Natural philosophy the order of nature, logical philosophy order among concpetions and moral philosophy order among action as they stand to some good. Question can be resolved but it takes too much time and effort..

Feel like he buys hella comments tbh. 2nd vid I've seen on his and there are loads of "love to see your channel grow" comments, and only a few ppl always complaning bout how these are chatgpt vids

Pin this person 🗣️💯‼️

Tier 2 was missing the omnipotence paradox from the image.

@@saftheartist6137 sometimes he skips some of the entries

I’m the 69th 👍 🎉

​@@mehaplebypotatocalledtaqwa4773 Bcs it's a bot, the person forgot to add it to the script

I see youve also watched the fortnite iceberg! Its very deep! Deeper than moisty mire!

You don’t realize how much this comment means to me, the whole reason I started making content is to get comments like this, just to make someone’s day a little bit better. Thank you for watching, much love ✌️

Nobody’s Nobody.

You're not a nobody friend

Philosophical questions stem from the sort of questions that we can wonder about; we can think about producing something, about doing something or about what thinking itself or about nature. Carpenter thinks about producing or making a chair, engineer about something else, builder about building, etc. this isn't called philosophy but art or carft. We think about what to do and this is different from the thinking about making something( the latter has a product that is in the end of the thought, but the former has an mastered action at the end), such as taking care of our loved ones and this is economic philosophy( because we mainly have to earn money and spend it well. "Economic" in ancient Greek means "household economic"), and taking care of the civil society and this is political philosophy. All these kinds of thought have an ethical aspect to them, and are called moral philosophy. We also think about thinking itself in logic where we consider whether a concept is applicable ( predicable) to something or not, as dog is not applicable to Socrates( as we don't say, "Socates is a dog") but man is( as we say, "Socates is a man"). The signs of concepts, like noun and verb and everything in grammar are also included here. The last part studies nature and this can be studied in many ways. All these divisions of philosophy express the order in one way or the other. Natural philosophy the order of nature, logical philosophy order among concpetions and moral philosophy order among action as they stand to some good. Question can be resolved but it takes too much time and effort..

Love the constructive criticism! I think that's one of the most supportive and helpful things someone can do for a creator they like, as long as it's genuine, like this. 😊

I've watched several of his videos so far and I won't lie the pronunciation, or rather mispronunciation of words becomes distracting very quickly. I was going to leave my own comment but decided to see if anyone else had noticed and mentioned it already.

when he sees a word he's never seen before, he really needs to look up the pronunciation. his guesses aren't good.

​@@VelvetySharkToastespecially names. Took me quite long to get he was saying Nietzsche (which is a German name) as a native speaker of German.

Philosophical questions stem from the sort of questions that we can wonder about; we can think about producing something, about doing something or about what thinking itself or about nature. Carpenter thinks about producing or making a chair, engineer about something else, builder about building, etc. this isn't called philosophy but art or carft. We think about what to do and this is different from the thinking about making something( the latter has a product that is in the end of the thought, but the former has an mastered action at the end), such as taking care of our loved ones and this is economic philosophy( because we mainly have to earn money and spend it well. "Economic" in ancient Greek means "household economic"), and taking care of the civil society and this is political philosophy. All these kinds of thought have an ethical aspect to them, and are called moral philosophy. We also think about thinking itself in logic where we consider whether a concept is applicable ( predicable) to something or not, as dog is not applicable to Socrates( as we don't say, "Socates is a dog") but man is( as we say, "Socates is a man"). The signs of concepts, like noun and verb and everything in grammar are also included here. The last part studies nature and this can be studied in many ways. All these divisions of philosophy express the order in one way or the other. Natural philosophy the order of nature, logical philosophy order among concpetions and moral philosophy order among action as they stand to some good. Question can be resolved but it takes too much time and effort..

was coming to makr this exact comment, some of the pronounciations are just so offputting. It takes you out of the immersion of the explanation and makes you feel like hes just reading a script he didn't write

@@nyankittycharliedude it is ai generated..lucrative

🧐 ✊

It's at, what, 30k right now? For being out less than 24 hours, that's pretty impressive! I bet he will end up with a few hundred thousand a few months down the line. He deserves it!

Thank you for the support bro

Good luck

Not really a philosophical question

@@27Floppswhoosh

I love when this happens 😂 but I gotta be careful sometimes or I have pretty much a nightmare

Crazy where the mid goes right? One of @Snook_YT 's video about space gave me a nightmare about liminal spaces... on other planets. There are no words. It was more fascinating than scary but I've never had a dream like that :) @@abigailmartinez9843

same except it was logic which has almost nothing to do with the stuff in this video lol

"Dark Lord Nyit'ch" 19:03

Yea how can we belive anything else he says if he got something so simple so wrong

@@mattjones2003do your own research instead of relying solely on KZfaq. He’s human

@@haleyrobert9141 I do thats why I was pissed that something so simple was wrong. He needs to do his research

W

I noticed the same thing with him saying baskilisk. It's not a big mistake and it doesn't take away from the video as a whole but it is a bit distracting

Yeah, I think he just mistook consciousness for conscience

😂 Touché

Isn't the point of a tier list for it to start with popular ideas and then go down to less known ones. So this sarcasm doesn't work

i mean who is to say if you succeed, they cant figure out a way to bring you back or keep whatever its keeping your consciousness alive so it to keeps going?

It’s a very scary rabbit hole to go down. Life ending for some.

@@corning1 Sometimes I'd like to think we're basically just the universe starting to become aware of itself and its asking itself the question of existence

Im 21, im about to finish my third and final year studying philosophy and im doing my final dissertation on Camus' myth of sisyphus. I for a majority of my life have felt the same way. It was hard to drag myself out of the nihilism hole, it took years. But slowly through living my life I discovered the true "meaning" of the word: meaning. Philosophers often use the term to refer to the objective/intrinsic value that a thing has. This has its roots in Aristotelian Christian tradition, but I (for as long as I can remember) have always viewed meaning to be a completely subjective and non-objective quality. I.e its not real, just something we project onto the world. What I learned slowly, and what might in retrospect seem obvious to everyone is that meaning, value, purpose, these are all subjective things that must be lived out and experienced subjectivley. They cannot be found through empirical observation or the scientific method. My youthful years of existential anguish stemmed from a couple of things. Firstly, I was indoctrinated into Christianity and found a way out. My justification behind that shift was my search for the truth, or atleast true things. But beneath Nihilism no such truth exists so you are no closer to the truth in being a Christian as you are being an Atheist. Secondly, I felt that being Atheist gave me some kind of super power that allowed me to see the world as it is instead of through some fantasy, delusion or illusion. Thus, the existentialist notion of "make your own meaning" was to me the same as believeing in a religion because neither of these things truly exist in the real world. Throughout my academic journey and really my life thus far, I have learned that we are not "objective" creatures. We are intrinsically tied to our subjectivity, we are hardwired to experience things through our own special senses and minds. Furthermore, I learned that without these things consciousness would not be possible, feelings like happiness and joy could not occur. In light of that, I realized that meaning as we experience it and understand it is not an intrinsic property of a thing but is instead an experience we have of our own lives/experiences. In this manner there is a key difference between religious faith and subjective meaning. One is a truth claim about the objective world while the other is a subjective self-assessment about ones own experiences. In other words, subjective meaning ≠ religious belief and it is fully possible to adopt one and not the other so long as you understand that your experiences are not objective properties of the world. Given that the distinction can be made, my issues sort of dissolved because I realized I could live my life and view it as meaningful without commiting to any extra beliefs or doctrines. This I think is why Camus is so loved and adored by philosophy students and readers, because he acknowledges the things which make life meaningful or atleast feel meaningful (subjective meaning) and props them up as the replacement for the traditional definition of meaning (meaning in the objective sense). He achieves his goal of "living without appeal" because his philosophy is so light weight and easy to practice. He defends the everyday man who feels the existential angst but does not cave in to it and gives him philosophical comfort.