Ikr that was great 😂

You gotta have SOME cav presence. Personally I would always go with 2 lancers. I suck at cav but I'm amazing with infantry, so my cav would essentially service to take out a decent chunk of theirs with one charge and let my infantry change formation to match what they're doing.

cav needs a lot of work on warhammer they aren't the powerful units that can change the course of the battle with a good charge in the back .

@@Natural_law_lawyer To be fair the game has giants and dragons. A man with a horse isn't the powerhouse it is in real world.

@@sagqe against those beings of course, when your charging in the back of standard infantry units, they should be doing a lot better.

You can put light infantry in-front of line infantry(in light infantry mode) and they won't kill the light infantry, and then you also place cavalry behind those line, effectively giving you 3 entire units firing from the same position, spread them out as much as possible, and you have the most possible guns shooting lead down range at the enemy. NTW

So the KGL secured the british supply train then... ^^

what house rules were you playing with?

@@constantinexi6489 not sure I played this around the beginning of February

Jesus loves everyone

@@padregaming8930 tight

The Emperor _certainly_ would. The half-trained early Republic levies that turned into vague blobs of pseudo-skirmishers out of sheer inability to hold formation but were perfectly happy to stick on the bayonets and go a-chargin' anyways, to the confusion and alarm of their adversaries for whom that kinda thing violated fundamental principles of infantry combat? Yeah they were a bit of a different story.

best tactic of the emperor, shock and awe!

@@nomooon Pretty sure that description would be altogether more fittingly applied to his innovation of massing artillery into grand batteries for localised fire superiority - befitting a chap who earned his spurs in the artillery. _Le feu tue_ as Pétain put it around 1911.

but why would you even *do* that D:

@@broadbandislife i feel like winning a battle without a mouse should be steam achievement

@@molmonlomek6336 Should earn you admittance into the Salty Spittoon at least.

Its not like the individual soldiers clip into each other. At least havnt observed that yet. So its absolutely possible IRL.

Wrong all units will take the charge damage, this means its completely opposite of what you say buddy. This means a single cavalry lancer unit could charge 6 units stacked from the rear and literally route all 6 with a single flanking charge...... I would laugh my ass off if an actual human with a brain thought that was a good idea. The problem is usually the Ai does this and gets completely destroyed. Also like Fracopolli said. The units have collision, they aren't ghosting into themselves. (over 1200 hours)

@@googleanti-speech7618 Lol ok. Did you rack up your 1,200 hours fighting AI or NTW3 multiplayer? Buddy ^^

whats the name of the mod?

@@ph1zzzas E10

@@tenzinloden7484 for which game?

@@ph1zzzas wow. Napoleon Total War obviously.

interesting fact I think after Waterloo most of the mamelukes that tried to return would get massacred by the French

@@Gloryholrr "Most" would be _rather_ an overstatement; le Wiki cites all of eighteen killed in "White Terror" reprisal violence in Marseilles (where the squadron depot was) while awaiting transport in 1815. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamelukes_of_the_Imperial_Guard

@@broadbandislife thanks its been a long time since I looked at NApoleonic units.

I would like to see them make changes to how you recruit units, how they're set up & work in battles etc, for example having settings that allow you to go every regiment I create will have x amount of battalions made up of x number of companies and be able to split the battalions and regiments in battle, so for example if you were holding off the enemy in one area but needed reinforcements elsewhere before you would end up having to move the whole unit there but would be great to just go I will move 3 companies from this battalion or these battalions to reinforce the other area or if its a rifle regiment for example attach them to a normal musket armed battalion as skirmishers.

@@stevencrouch6036 You would like Grant Tactician: The Civil War my guys. The graphics are a solid 4 1/2 out of 10, but everything else is honestly beyond total war atm.

@@spiffygonzales5160 Yeah I seen videos of it, looks good, would be great if total war had similar mechanics Grand Tactician and other strategy games have.

He had plenty of good commanders who performed very well without his presence. It just seemed by the time most of those same commanders were placed in Iberia their luck ran out.

They are Portuguese caçadores

british rifle regiment uniforms were darkish green, not dark black.

A true harry potter fan😅

To be fair, Napoleon mostly gutted a lot of mechanics from Empire so that it would be easier to fix the A.I.

@@spiffygonzales5160 and they still didn't fix the AI :(

Yeah, the French players are letting themselves outflank. This seems like what hannibal did in cannae.

God is on the side of sober commanders, the teetoaler old coot

Bruh, use ur imagination. It could pass as Spain and the armies are all from Spain

@@PixelatedApollo1 sry my master apollo, I didn't want to contradict u

yeah i understand, but why would there be Iberian Armies in Italy

@@PixelatedApollo1 same reason there were Mamelukes in what you presumed was Iberia, because players choose what they want.

they are different armies led by different players yes.

@@robowisanveithasung6022 thats what i meant

@@unifiedhorizons2663 ah then i answered your question correctly, do not not worry

@@robowisanveithasung6022 thank you

@@robowisanveithasung6022 russian player now feels over burden He fought on 4 fronts instead of 2 OR 1 while France had a Polish player to cover weak points in his forces