Will you continue and complete "The last of us 2" the game????? Please answer so we know. It sad you stopped and just left it and us.

​@@ilikeutube8728stop helping

I would like to make an unexpected narrative. Watching movies today they are much more predictable than Harry Potter.

@@ilikeutube8728 stop helping

​@@jbwade5676 ???

Make's you wonder is faking your death the forbidden 13th use of dragon blood or was one of the listed uses of dragon's blood literally "imitating human blood" - considering one of the listed uses was "as an oven cleaner" I do actually think the latter might be the actual truth.

He also knows Slughorn pretty well and isn't stupid.

@@passionsquietrage lol

He didn't necessarily discover the twelve uses, he simply enumerated the definitive list. Possibly investigating each of them, and possibly other false ones that had been claimed. I'm sure many of the uses had been known for centuries.

@@PhilBagels In lore another person claims to have discovered 8 of the uses previously and that Dumbledore used his work, its never questioned if Dumbledore found the other 4

but did lucius truly love draco? bc he was always so nasty to him it didnt even look like “tough love” anymore

This is all your fault

@@teri5585 I don't think Lucius knows what real love looks like so he does what he knows.

@@teri5585 I think he did, in a weird and twisted way. At the end of 8th movie and in the book, we see them looking for Draco so they could run away.

@@teri5585When was Lucius ever nasty to Draco? Like name one single time. Lucius did everything for him, was always present, he risked getting tortured to death whilst having the balls to ask Voldemort to call off the attack so they could search for Draco. In the films they had that one scene in which he hits Draco with his walking stick ig, never in the books tho. And Rowling has stated that the reason the Malfoys are unlike all the other death eaters is because they truly love each other.

the only thing potter remember from classes

i think it's more of he's getting suspicious of harry's increased potions skills. it was the solution he'd written in his old book.

Honestly, that is phenomenal continuity of writing. I think its both. A call back to the first movie and that hes clueing in to the fact that Harry has his old Potions book. Its been so long since ive read the books so the credit may need to go to JK Rowling.

To be fair, Harry didn't need Snape's potion book for that, he DID remember the Bezoar from his first potion class.

Movie lore wise, bezoar was mentioned in the first movie. Book lore wise bezoar was mentioned in the first book AND in the Half Blood Prince, One of Slughorn's classes everyone has to make an antidote to a poison, Hermione is feeling pretty smug because doing so is more theory so Harry can't just follow some simple instructions. But on top of Harry's page for making antidotes it simply say "Just use a bezoar". So Harry takes a chance, he doesn't make an antidote and grabs a bezoar and shows Slughorn, Slughorn loves Harry's nerve.

It makes sense either way though

@@passionsquietrage it does but it doesn’t. The movie version applied that Tom was bullied, the book implies that he was a little evil psycho who hurt people for fun

@@benmorgan8890 I feel like he was both.

@@passionsquietrage In the books the other kids were scared of him, they completely freaked out.

@@benmorgan8890 And the fact that Voldemort was conceived through the use of a love potion. Because of that, he didn't know how to feel love.

not even Dumbledore??

@@alex-z1q2g nope, but Dumbledore was pro at apparating, he could do it basically from everywhere

I like how she says Remus black instead of regulus black 🤣🤣

@@domiiinik4320 apparating is way better than flying. i guess that's why he never learned or maybe he knew its just not mentioned in the books

​@@alex-z1q2gIf I'm not mistaken, it was mentioned once in the book that Dumbledore can fly without a broom if he wants to.

Yeah...

how did she knew snape is half blood prince, in movie did they hinted any of that? In novel I know offcourse book was found in snape old potions cupboard ( as he was potion master earlier) so it's his notes but how did she know snape is half blood prince just by seeing the movie? even snape parentage is not discussed in the movie( dad, muggle born, mother as Hermione discovered by newspaper, a witch, captain of gobstones team in Hogwarts, living in spinners end) - in movie nothing is shown, how did she guessed snape is half blood prince, others facts is fine I guess ( Dumbledore old, blackened hand, and past experience with snape actions, someone might think that way)... I'm inclining to think that indeed she had watched this prior, or has book knowledge.

​@@priyanshusingh3316 she 100 percent knows. You have to live under a rock not to know snapes backstory by now. If she wants to act like a wizard of knowledge that's up to her. We know the truth but at least she didn't guess rab correctly. Also nobody is gonna retain a fleeting glimpse of something for 2 hours.

obviously she either watched it before or heard ead about the plot. i mean it is very hard (almost impossible) to stay away from spoilers all these years

@@zawiliousor she has common sense… i predicted it when i first watched it when it came out and had never read the books… It was just an obvious plot twist

And it makes sense because Ginny is the only living person who has experience with possession by Voldemort, so she understands Harry’s emotional turmoil.

Yeah that cop out was weak and snobby as fuck., "I'm an actress and because of that I know how to pick apart plots and twists from every movie I ever see. I know how movie sets and behind the scenes works. So that gives me the gift of clarevoyance to movies." She clearly isn't pausing every 10-20 seconds to pic apart every scene like she claims. Otherwise there would be hard cuts and changes in posture (since people move around) every 10 seconds in this reaction unless she wanted to leave in her "analyzing" and have a 3 hour reaction video every movie. She's clearly seen the movies before. It might have been a long time ago but she's seen them. Yeah there is plot twists and secrets that are hinted at and can be picked up if caught. Like the R.A.B. clue. Which is Regulas Black. Her trying to show that is how she cracks open every twist was a weak showing. That's obvious one that can be though back on. But certain twists even in these movies are hidden until the reveal, on purpose. But nope, she somehow gets them

​@@anakinskywalker8610I think the OP meant on Patreon mate 😅

Reaction channels are for entertainment 1st an foremost

I replied to the wrong comment. Nvm im sorry my mistake. Im human

He died years after the last movie so it had zero influence over any of it. Do people listen to what they are saying in their head first to make sure it makes sense? Reading your comment the answer is obviously no.

It most likely wasn't necessary for the narrative the movies were following.

It wouldn’t had added anything to the plot

​@@andrewft31 it maybe wasn't strictly necessary, but it would have shown something about Dumbledore's character that I think the movies are kind of missing.

700 pages in a little over 2 hours. Lots of things were cut. Hopefully the HBO remake covers all of it.

@@dimitrisionas9566 Not all of it was needed in the movies though.

This is one of the weakest movies imo. Which is sad because it has the strongest book as material. So many character and plot assasination its not even funny

@@mattiasandersson8693 How is it the weakest film in the series? It sets up a lot for the future while also showing a lot character development for several people. This film signals the change, a tide that has come, one that each character has to face. I think it’s pretty strong.

@@MetastaticMaladies because it misses a LOT of plot points that are rather vital to the story, plus all the usual minor ones, plus all the important character moments. You can have it as your favorite film. But as someone that considers the 6th book the best one, I cant rank it anything other than last on the list.

I agree. It's not very flashy, but it is very good.

@@mattiasandersson8693 I’m not taking the books into account on these films. I’m looking at them purely based on the previous movies. So, what you said about this film could be said about every single other HP film. Actually, you could say that about EVERY movie adapted from a book. I honestly don’t think anyone should look at these movies as strict adaptation of the books, especially because Rowling had creative control over each movie, if something wasn’t done or something was “missing” it’s because she did not want to add it.

And somehow she knew Harry was her son.

@@brandonbullingtonwhy wouldn’t she? harry was given to her by dumbledore in the beginning of the book duh. his aunt knew of hogwarts since they were children. she even wrote to dumbledore if she too could come and learn magic. she was denied of course since she’s a muggle by dumbledore hence her hatred towards her sister and the wizarding world.

@@brandonbullington why wouldn’t she? harry was given to her by dumbledore in the beginning of the book duh. his aunt knew of hogwarts since they were children. she even wrote to dumbledore if she too could come and learn magic. she was denied of course since she’s a muggle by dumbledore hence her hatred towards her sister and the wizarding world.

@@kdf_dudu do you even know what Harry Potter is?

​@brandonbullington do you?

Same reason we never met Charlie Weasely even though he had a fair intro in Goblet of Fire. Minimize the number of characters and you minimize the number of actors who have to be paid. Plus, to stay true to the book, Tonks's hair would be drab brown for no obvious reason and cause confusion.

@@MGower4465 Tonks was in this movie anyways and her hair was brown…

@@MGower4465 More for the sake of simplifying the overall plot. There wasn't a reason to include that part of Lupin/Tonks relationship, and plenty of other things to focus on. Plus it gives Luna a little more screen time, which is always good in my mind.

Because it contributes nothing to the plot, remember Rowling approved any changes made so they had to make sense to her

Yup, Luna isn't supposed to be able to mend a broken nose, that's advanced healing magic. But Tonks can, she's had extended aurar training after Hogwarts.

Doe. Without horns. This is about the same as calling a black dog, which Sirius could turn into, a wolf.

find out if I do or not NOW! on www.patreon.com/colettecherry

​@@ColetteCherrylmao we all know you do. "Acting prodigy" as you love to gloat about or not. The convenience of your guesses and the feigns of ignorance are so obvious. Most of us know you've seen these movies

Just don't spoil Harry's parents are really alive and are Voldemorts top assassins.

Yea she’s either seen these or read the books 100%😂and as someone who genuinely enjoys seeing first time reactions on KZfaq when I started realizing she knew way to much it ruined the vids for me

@@jasonc4228 not only that but she also says alot of the lines right before they are said by the characters

LOL SHE EVEN GUESSED THAT??? I KNEW watching this would be a waste, so had to check the comments to be sure 🤣

@@jasonc4228 5:23 there is regulus black.

@@kikolandzik Near the end of the reaction video, I believe I heard CC say "Remus Black." Guess she was excited by the action on the screen.

Because then each movie would be 4 hours are all of them would be 2 parters

No it was just edited that way…. You realize I have to cut 2+ hours out ? This is a highly edited SNIPPET of the movie and my commentary.

To watch my full breakdown and analysis , it’s on www.patreon.com/colettecherry Unfortunately this is very highly edited for copyright. It doesn’t take a genius to guess the plot of a children’s movie. These films are intended for children.

​@@ColetteCherryChildren's movie , I am 20 and this statement hurts 🤕 I think 5 to 8 are more adult oriented as many of us grow older with them

​@@aditya_2901 its a childrens movie in the same way that star wars or a series of unfortunate events is. People die and get hurt but the plot is whimsical, uncomplicated, and easily understood by children. People seem to have this weird idea that if a character dies it's automatically "not for kids," which I suspect stems from insecurity around being an adult and still liking "kid things." Kids can understand and process death, kids movies and shows can have characters die. Most of us had a grandparent or aunt/uncle die when we were children, it's not like we don't have any experience with that until adulthood.

I have hated how much of the books were edited to be able to make the movies. Since the 4th book, there was enough material to make each book/movie into a 2 parter. **(Since I didn't see this before in the comments) Snape is the Half-Blood Prince, because he is a half-blood, and his mother's maiden name is Prince (father's is Snape, obviously). So, put them together, and he is the Half-Blood Prince. (Which is why it's the title of the book!)

samee, i thought it couldn't get worse until i watched deathly hallows part 2

@@SofieHaugk-ew3pqpart 1 and part 2 got me again

@@BluEx22329 but bad acting .... easily caught out

Broke me into 7. I had to hide six of them.

I never heard that. It makes their reactions even funnier.

Yeah no in the half blood prince book it is written in that most cures are impractical because you can simple use a bizzor, and in one of his classes slughorn is teaching them about antidotes and having them brew one and harry puts a bizzor down and he says it’s brilliant. That ends up being the same one he gives to Ron. I do not know off hand if the movies add in the bizzor in the first one

@@foreignhades6788 she's not fooling anyone

Everyone knows she ain't watching it first time It's a classic every one have watched these

@@Adonis-or8if Yeah lol..., honestly this reaction video in particular got me *especially* doubtful and skeptical of Colette's claims that she is actually watching the Harry Potter movies 'for the first time' and is going in completely blind... First, she managed to correctly deduce the main mystery of who the Half-Blood Prince is *completely* out of the blue at 47:49 and it was during a scene that Snape wasn't even involved in lol. Also, the Half-Blood Prince movie doesn't even put a focus on presenting the mystery of "Who is the Half-Blood Prince?" and the movie instead puts more of a focus on teenage romance unlike what the original book did. Then, right after the word Horcrux was mentioned, i.e. a completely random word that was *just* introduced, she *immediately* confidently says "you must have to kill people to have a Horcrux" at 53:19 *before* the movie explained what a Horcrux even is which is just unbelievable. And finally, as I've already brought up and typed about, what *really* made me lean towards the people in the comment section who are accusing her of already seeing the Harry Potter movies was when she managed to correctly deduce who R.A.B. was at 1:06:16 which is *insane* to me lol... Like that actually annoyed me -_- lol... I've literally never seen a single reactor correctly deduce that R.A.B. is Sirius Black's brother before it finally gets revealed in "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1", albeit she misremembered his first name and got it mixed up with another character's first name but *still* lol... Also, in her quote-unquote "final theory" at 1:08:18, she basically laid out almost verbatim what's going to happen in the final two movies with Dumbledore and Snape lol... Like bro..., if she manages to immediately "correctly guess" how Harry is gonna open the Golden Snitch or who sent the doe Patronus or confidently says something like "Something's gonna happen to Dobby guys. They're leaning into that. I can tell," just like she did right before Sirius died in Order of the Phoenix, in her "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1" reaction video then that's gonna seal the deal for me that she's definitely not watching the Harry Potter movies 'for the first time' lol...

@@Adonis-or8ifthen why are my cousins who are adults never seen the movies? Oh yeah cuz people have religious beliefs and a LOT of Christian’s see magic as evil so no not everyone has seen them lol

na bellatrix cant fly the only 2 people who can are voldemort and snape

at 46:19 Harry uses the Sectumsempra curse on Malfoy. He gets this curse from the Half Blood Prince's notes. He then gets rid of the half blood prince book because of his usage of this curse. It is clear is is the half blood prince's curse. then snape comes and heals Malfoy in the bathroom, almost like he knew exactly what to do to remedy the curse, which then I see him use that curse on Snape at the end of the film. It's easier to remember names when the subtitles are there. when he uses it again on Snape, I can recall it because of the subtitles and my memory of sectumsempra being used before. easy to connect the dots when you repeat everything out loud and pause throughout :)

Honestly, the look snape give to Harry after seem Draco and imediately starts to heal him, really set it up. Harry Potter movies are pretty good in setting clues on the background. It's one of it's major qualities as film. And i don't thing she knew the story before because she didn't noticed Lupin is a Werewolf on spot. And there's a lot of clues about it.

Maybe he is bad. We can’t be sure.

Everything in Harry Potter is hinted at 🧚‍♀️

What about the fact that it was Snape who knew the counter-curse against Sectumsempra. When did Harry hurt Draco in the bathroom?

@@user-fx7ox3jq6m for all intents and purposes it just looks like a healing spell. There was no explanation too and from what we’ve been shown in the movies in particular specific counter curses aren’t discussed.

Its not that Snape "does potions too" its that he is the best at potions what gives a hint to the owner of the book. Also its a little bit sus (especially with previous potion related suspicions) that despite not being a healer he instantly knew the counter spell/ healing spell to fix it and the spell didnt just heal him it pulled all the blood back inside.

@@jamesmoore2232 No one but the author could know the contents of the Prince's textbook. No corrections to recipes, much less spells. Because the Prince himself invented them. Hermione personally said that she had been to the library and had not found even a mention of the Half-blood Prince. Which means that no one could know the counter-curses from him either. At the same time, when Snape looked at the wounded Draco, it was clear from his look: he knows what he was cursed with.

@@user-fx7ox3jq6m you’re coming at this argument as someone knowledgeable from outside sources. You can apply that logic yourself all you want but from a strick cinema format from the point of view of the reactor that information is not portrayed in the movies at all. To someone who simply watches the movies it looks like draco has some cuts, snape walks in and casts some random healing charm for cuts.

A reckless child

That was great haha

This is all your fault man

Don't forget about the end credit scene 👌.

Relax brother, the film has been out of sync with her video for the entire series, it's not that deep

She may have watched before or maybe she hasn’t, but she’s right in that the twists aren’t exactly rocket science here.

she somehow also knows how horcrux is created... well she is an actor herself she can fake reaction.

​@rileytruax766 Seriously? That makes me even more convinced. I was starting to feel bad but if she's deleting those comments then that makes it even worse. Is it that big of a deal for her to admit she's seen these before.

1st one becoz she didnt know how to acting 🤣🤣

@@HispanicMan I can second this.

Yep, and a portfolio. I imagine it could be great material for the right studio. A kind of "look at how genuine my reactions appear, and look at how many people fall for it."

Agreed. It's the combination of being able to see and pick apart the individual threads while still being able to get swept away by the complete tapestry that does it for me.

Also i personally think the reaction field is a good one to get into if u want to write. The best writers I love have 3 things in common: They feel deeply, they are very smart and they consume their chosen art form voraciously. You have the first two, we can see from ur reactions. The third is time and effort. The more u consume the more wide ranging ur knowledge in general and of the art in particular. (As someone who writes music) each step in creation is a series of choices and options (often to use one technique or another). Very few techniques or ideas are really "new". What IS new is how u move from step to step in a compelling satisfying and logical way. If u have a huge library of ideas to draw upon u can scroll through them to see how different writers would handle each step, each choice. You can play into that or against it, but the breadth of the library and the nouse to find the best choice for ur work - that’s what makes a great writer. My perspective at least from someone who thinks about thinking about creation too much.

I had no idea what it was until it was revealed? . I’m paying attention to details as they come.. as they described it I pieced it together like anyone else analyzing a movie bit by bit