Bro

Спасибо тебе ❤️

No

Thank you brother 🙏🙌

Kiitos oikein paljon! Рахмет дегенді білдіреді! We will do our best to keep our languages authentic. Love to Kazakhstan from Finland! 🇫🇮❤️🇰🇿

wow, I didn't think this aspect yet, however other language cousins under oppression.

Így igaz!

@@JoeSanHUN like what?

@Zhong Xiong eleven lol xD

@Zhong Xiong السلام عليكم

Szintén igy érzem

Mi???? Milyen rokonságban állunk mi ezekkel a népekkel, hogy több kapcsolatot szeretnél tartani?! A finnugor nyelvcsalád marhaság megbukott, az MTA nevezetű gittegylet marhasága ez csupán. A minden magyar szót másokhoz csatol, kizárja, hogy a maga jogán egy magyar szó magyar eredetű legyen, pedig senki sem beszél így nyelvet, ahogy mi! Annyi alapon, amennyi a hangalaki egyezés a finn-ugorban van, annyi lehetne a törökben is akkor. De nem vagyunk török sem és nem a Szíriuszról jöttünk…. Csak annyi a helyzet, hogy a Habsburg kamarilla 200 éve fosztja meg a magyart a gyökereitől! A magyar a logika nyelve, a szó-bokor elemzést kellene tanítani.

Imádom végigmérni a népviseletet a Finn-Ugor népek között. Azonos ruházat, beszédstílus, hangok... zseniális. ☺

felattila HAJRA TURAN

@@Mikhailkarakas1916 no

Tek yol; son umut; Turan!

I'd like it more if they didnt blatently hide the fact that most those cultures are compromised of way more asiatic than european features yet they couldnt show one that looked asiatic. Its too bad because there are a beautiful people too just like the white uralics

moi

iltaa

>Grönberg Dismissed

Perkele (BTW i love finland ❤️)

moi

You are livonian?? That's so awesome! (I'm an estonian with far livonian roots)

Yes I am. I live in Saunags ( Sǟnag ) Tere !!! :)

+Obon b Hi from Finland

The most popular Livonian sogs: 1) Sadā, Vīmo 2) Īdōn(O) Izān(O) Īdoks(O) Poigō 3) Livonian anthem Min izāmō

Wow. :)

It’s not proven that this ”uralic-altaic” is a language group since there are not enough similarities within them. However it is believed that these two language groups might have been from the same area in the past (proto-uralic and proto-turkic), but of course that has nothing to do with originating from the same proto-language. This ”uralic-altaic language group” is an old theory

@@juulia8983 the languages were indeed in contact, as long as they formed a sprachbund, but there's no evidence of a common ancestor

@@bastianodimebag all languages take influences of other languages but as the original comment said, turkic and uralic languages had/has nothing to do with each other, meaning they are not of the same origin and that’s why there are only some similarities withing words mostly, because languages take influence and some words happen to be similar, but there is still a believe of this ”uralic-alraic group” which is false and never proven

@@bastianodimebag and as i said, the languages have been in contact but that doesn’t make the languages related since all languages take influences from neighbouring countries or just languages that are in contact with them. And that explains why turkic and uralic languages have similarities but are not related

Bizimle Akrabalıklari yok ama Urallar kendi içinde akraba Altay dil ailesi diye adlandırdıkları grup ise çökmüş durumda Türk dil grubundakiler tek başına bir aile, Korece ve Japonca ise izole dil olarak kabul görüyor artık..

Saif Restifer Khomain köcce

Saif Restifer Khomain khmm : Thanks

HungarianGamer welcome. Are you from Uralic family?

Saif Restifer Khomain japp

HungarianGamer sorry. What you meaning by "japp"?

@Mutong Tang 🧠🤲🤲

Vay Türk

bizim eski komşularımız eski akrabalarımız sizi unutmadık

Greetings from Russia brothers 👋

So ypubare kyrgyz(maybe?) but whats that thing with your picture? I mean the flags, i dont understand...

@@magyar2896 Its just a flag man dont over think it

@@xanshen9011 magyars have nothing to do with bulgars

@@magyar2896 The Pannonian Bulgars have been absorbed by the Magyar migrations. So yes, Bulgars & Magyars have a linked history.

​@@xanshen9011they were something like ural skythians because this sound like Bulgarian folk music is the only similar folklore in the world

It is sung in Finnish.

Me naiset - Kuulin äänen

Com'è possibile questo incrocio?

@@bastianodimebag he is probably from USA, that's why

old cousins are russ Turks are Mongol

@@itzz-monster6272 Turks are Turks, Mongols are Mongols, Uralics are Uralics

Urallar kendi içinde bir akraba biz Türk dilleri ailesi ile akrabayiz

Are indoeuropeans related to Uralic?

@@rsp3654 yeah they're both people

Hi brother finn (I'm mari) 😀👋

Bjarmians were Finnic

We are not Uralic but here is the Turkish equivalents of these words. Su (Water), Boynuz (Horn), Geyik(Deer), Omuz(Arm), Göz(Eye), Mouth(Ağız), Tendon(Tendon){What a difference!}🤣 Baş (Head), Kel(Bald), Kim(Who), Ne(What), Anne(Mother), Ağaç(Tree), Kan(Blood), Kaya(Stone), Od/Ateş(Fire), Yel/Rüzgar (Wind), Ok(Arrow), Balık (Fish), Canlı (Live), Buz(Ice), Eski(Old), Git (Go), Alt(Under), Öte/Üst/Yukarı (Above), Masal (Tale), Yurt/Çadır(Tent-House), Delik(Hole) Yumurta(Egg), Yumuşak(Soft) Var(There is/Exist). Bir İki Üç Dört Beş Altı Yedi Sekiz Dokuz On (1-10) Yirmi(20) Otuz(30) Kırk (40) Elli(50) Altmış(60) Yetmiş(70) Seksen(80) Doksan(90) Yüz(100) Bin(1.000) Tümen(10.000)

hungarian not finno-ugric....newsbeezer.com/hungaryeng/miklos-kasler-the-arpad-dynasty-was-founded-4500-years-ago-in-the-northern-part-of-what-is-now-afghanistan/

upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ad/Scythia-Parthia_100_BC.png

I know this is a late answer but here's the words in finnish :)! Vesi (water), sarvi (horn), peura (deer), käsi /käsivarsi (arm), silmä (eye), suu (mouth), jänne (tendon), pää (head), kalju (bald), kuka (who), mikä (what), äiti (mother), puu (tree), veri (blood), kivi (stone), tuli (fire), tuuli (wind), nuoli (arrow), kala (fish), elä- /elää(live), jää (ice), vanha (old), mennä (go), alla (under), yllä (above), legenda , taru (old story), jurtta (tent-house), reikä (hole), muna (egg), pehmeä (soft), on (is), yksi kaksi kolme neljä viisi kuusi seitsemän kahdeksan yhdeksän kymmenen (1-10), kaksikymmentä (20), kolmekymmentä (30), neljäkymmentä (40), viisikymmentä (50), kuusikymmentä (60), seitsemänkymmentä (70), kahdeksankymmentä (80), yhdeksänkymmentä (90), sata (100) I also added the numbers from 30-90, like how the reply above me did.

🤺☦🇷🇺Dear and beloved Finnics, you are the founders of our Rus nation. You are the descendants of Meshech

Try to forget those "cases". Imagine it like glueing words together. really small words ... Sometimes the indo european grammar can't fit to other languages.

@@e1gr3co Gluing doesn't work if the cases change the word completely.

@@hfsgsfgdfg4500 sorry donno what do you mean

@@e1gr3co Cases modify the root of the word.

@@hfsgsfgdfg4500 please give an example

Darkness 55 The Avars and preconquest Hungarians (Magyars) were shown to have mostly Haplogroup N, which makes sense because Haplogroup N is the most common haplogroup amongst Uralic peoples (90>% in Nenets, Nganasan; 70>% in Khanty and Mansi which are the closest Ugric relatives to Hungarians, 60% in Finns etc.) and some Turkic peoples (90>% in Yakuts, 30% in Chuvash, Tatar, Bashkir etc.). Haplogroup Q was actually a relatively minor haplogroup compared to N amongst the Uralic and Turkic peoples.

hungarian not uralic...newsbeezer.com/hungaryeng/miklos-kasler-the-arpad-dynasty-was-founded-4500-years-ago-in-the-northern-part-of-what-is-now-afghanistan/

We have a standard of DNA for each ethnic groups but it doesn't always mean everything, especially for ethnic families. The ethnic group is based on common culture, language, traditions, society, conscience and sometimes religion. We can't define who is Turkic, Uralic, North African and so on based on DNA if ethnic groups don't share these particularities. DNA are genetic modifications made for the human to be conditioned to the area it lives in (climate, physical geography, etc) and then some end up not changing.

@@AllanLimosin They just referr to the autosomal DNA which is tipical for a region tru the generations,same mutations and so on but the data is just a statistical one,if you go to a accuracy of 90% the same autosomal mutations are very rare,problemm of the tested when they declare birthland,living land etc the algorhytm takes the stryke.

Its a shame perm and othera arent that well covered on youtube 🤔would love to learn more on their history 😊👌

Lol...indo-European comes from central asia too...

Gary walker They originated in modern day Ukraine and Russia North of the Caucasus in the European steppe. Indo-Aryans branches of and migrated through Central Asia to Southern Asia and mixed heavily with the locals (indigenous population) which gives Modern day South Asians. The Yamanaya which is the European side of Indo-European Linguistic group went further into Europe. They originated in the European steppe North of the Caucasus in the bridge of Europe to Asia not Central Asia. That’s what I believe is true.

@@missthing5842 eurasian steppe*..

@@missthing5842 Eurasian steppe* fake etnologyst 😂🖕🏻

Crixus Gallic Warband I’m no ethnologist (you obviously can’t spell🧚🏽✨💫) But it’s facts. I made a mistake and said European steppe when it’s the Eurasian steppe. Can I not make mistakes? Or did you just copy what the other person said? 🙃✨ Regardless, you got a bit to angry a bit to fast. Don’t join conversations no one asked you to join. 🧚🏽✨💫

+Temesvári Hunor Oh my god. That wasn't genocide by russians, that was assimilation. By the way, I'm not russian. I am Chuvash nationally. We speak turkic-bulgar language but have volga-finnish culture with Mari and Mordvins.

Denis Yarukhin The Russian imperialist expansion towards the North and East happened through sword and fire. There are only a few tens of thousands of indigenous Uralic people left in Russia.

Temesvári Hunor sword and fire? Any proofs?

Denis Yarukhin Why don't they teach real history in Russia? These are common knowledge to anybody interested in history. Russia's conquest of Siberia "Historian John F. Richards wrote: "... it is doubtful that the total early modern Siberian population exceeded 300,000 persons. ... New diseases weakened and demoralized the indigenous peoples of Siberia. The worst of these was smallpox "because of its swift spread, the high death rates, and the permanent disfigurement of survivors." ... In the 1650s, it moved east of the Yenisey, where it carried away up to 80 percent of the Tungus and Yakut populations. In the 1690s, smallpox epidemics reduced Yukagir numbers by an estimated 44 percent. The disease moved rapidly from group to group across Siberia."[55] The Russian conquest of Siberia was accompanied by massacres due to indigenous resistance to colonization by the Russian Cossacks, who savagely crushed the natives. At the hands of people like Vasilii Poyarkov in 1645 and Yerofei Khabarov in 1650 some peoples like the Daur were slaughtered by the Russians to the extent that it is considered genocide. 8,000 out of a previously 20,000 strong population in Kamchatka remained after being subjected to half a century of Cossacks slaughter.[56] The Daurs initially deserted their villages since they heard about the cruelty of the Russians the first time Khabarov came.[57] The second time he came, the Daurs decided to do battle against the Russians instead but were slaughtered by Russian guns.[58] In the 17th century, indigenous peoples of the Amur region were attacked by Russians who came to be known as "red-beards".[59] The Russian Cossacks were named luocha (羅剎), after Demons found in Buddhist mythology, by the Amur natives because of their cruelty towards the Amur tribes people, who were subjects of the Qing dynasty during the Sino-Russian border conflicts.[60] In the 1640s the Yakuts were subjected to slaughters during the Russian advance into their land near the Lena river, and on Kamchatka in the 1690s the Koryak, Kamchadals, and Chukchi were also subjected to slaughters by the Russians.[61] When the Russians did not obtain the demanded amount of yasak from the natives, the Governor of Yakutsk, Piotr Golovin, who was a Cossack, used meat hooks to hang the native men. In the Lena basin, 70% of the Yakut population died within 40 years, and rape and enslavement were used against native women and children in order to force the natives to pay the Yasak.[57] In Kamchatka the Russians savagely crushed the Itelmens uprisings against their rule in 1706, 1731, and 1741, the first time the Itelmen were armed with stone weapons and were badly unprepared and equipped but they used gunpowder weapons the second time. The Russians faced tougher resistance when from 1745-56 they tried to exterminate the gun and bow equipped Koraks until their victory. The Russian Cossacks also faced fierce resistance and were forced to give up when trying unsuccessfully to wipe out the Chukchi through genocide in 1729, 1730-1, and 1744-7.[62] After the Russian defeat in 1729 at Chukchi hands, the Russian commander Major Pavlutskiy was responsible for the Russian war against the Chukchi and the mass slaughters and enslavement of Chukchi women and children in 1730-31, but his cruelty only made the Chukchis fight more fiercely.[63] A genocide of the Chukchis and Koraks was ordered by Empress Elizabeth in 1742 to totally expel them from their native lands and erase their culture through war. The command was that the natives be "totally extirpated" with Pavlutskiy leading again in this war from 1744-47 in which he led to the Cossacks "with the help of Almighty God and to the good fortune of Her Imperial Highness", to slaughter the Chukchi men and enslave their women and children as booty. However the Chukchi ended this campaign and forced them to give up by killing Pavlitskiy and decapitating his head.[64] The Russians were also launching wars and slaughters against the Koraks in 1744 and 1753-4. After the Russians tried to force the natives to convert to Christianity, the different native peoples like the Koraks, Chukchis, Itelmens, and Yukagirs all united to drive the Russians out of their land in the 1740s, culminating in the assault on Nizhnekamchatsk fort in 1746.[65] Kamchatka today is European in demographics and culture with only 2.5% of it being native, around 10,000 from a previous number of 150,000, due to the mass slaughters by the Cossacks after its annexation in 1697 of the Itelmen and Koryaks throughout the first decades of Russian rule.[66] The genocide by the Russian Cossacks devastated the native peoples of Kamchatka and exterminated much of their population.[67][68] In addition to committing genocide they Cossacks also devastated the wildlife by slaughtering massive amounts of animals for fur.[69] 90% of the Kamchadals and half of the Vogules were killed from the eighteenth to nineteenth centuries and the rapid genocide of the indigenous population led to entire ethnic groups being entirely wiped out, with around 12 exterminated groups which could be named by Nikolai Iadrintsev as of 1882. Much of the slaughter was brought on by the fur trade.[70] The Aleuts in the Aleutians were subjected to genocide and slavery by the Russians for the first 20 years of Russian rule, with the Aleut women and children captured by the Russians and Aleut men slaughtered.[71] The regionalist oblastniki in the 19th century among the Russians in Siberia acknowledged that the natives were subjected to immense genocidal cruelty by the Russian colonization, and claimed that they would rectify the situation with their proposed regionalist polices.[72] The Russians used "slaughter, alcoholism and disease" to bring the natives under their control, who were soon left in misery, and much of the evidence of their extermination has itself been destroyed by the Russians, with only a few artifacts documenting their presence remaining in Russian museums and collections.[73] The Russian colonization of Siberia and treatment of the resident indigenous peoples has been compared to European colonization of the Americas, with similar negative impacts on the indigenous Siberians as upon the indigenous peoples of the Americas. One of these commonalities is the appropriation of indigenous peoples' land.[74] The Slavic Russians outnumber all of the indigenous peoples in both rural and urban Siberia, except in the Republic of Tuva. Slavic Russians are the majority population in the Buriat, Sakha, and Altai Republics, outnumbering the indigenous Buriat, Sakha, and Altai. The Buriat make up only 25% of their own Republic. The Sakha and Altai each are only one-third of the population in their traditional territories, and the Chukchi, Evenk, Khanti, Mansi, and Nenets are also outnumbered by the non-natives who make up 90% of the population. The indigenous peoples of these regions were targeted by the Czars and Soviet policies to change their way of life; the indigenous peoples' reindeer herds - which provide their food, clothing and income - were confiscated by the government, with the herds and wild game hunting rights given instead to the Russian citizens. This has resulted in the reindeer herds now being mismanaged to the point of near extinction. In just the American state of Arizona, the Native American population outnumbers the total northern Siberian native population of 180,000.[75]"

+Temesvári Hunor We can thank Russia for their demise...

Rosjanie to nie Słowianie. ..

@@loulou3738 докажи . Россияне - это гражданство. Россиянами могут быть: русские, украинцы, татары, калмыки, башкиры, мордвинцы, чеченцами, дагестанцами, бурятами и остальные около 140 национальностей. А вот если выделить русских, то они славяне, т.к. русский не похож не на один из финно-угорских языков. Он относится к СЛАВЯНСКОМУ РОДУ!

@@bodyaindahood97 туге

@@loulou3738 so stupid statement

zedasilva3 MeNaiset - Kuulin äänen

Most were made irreligious by the communists. Finns by money and pride supported by flattery of the human mind by education. And in the Middle East, the Afro-Asiatic people were always passionate of God. If you see the 3 sons of Noah: Shem, Kham and Yafet - Shem related to the path with God they learned from Noah with love - so passion included. Kham made crimes linked with sexuality - which is still visible in the nations coming from them: and they have spread it to European cultures. The Europeans, Asians and Uralic people who are Eurasians , are the sons of Yafet. Yafet respected the God of Noah, but didn't show love. So it seems he wanted to rationalize it - explain things with his own head - the spirit of humanism, atheism. Found already in how Satan tempted Adam and Eve. Kham's rebellion is told with a story. But it's only said in a few words, what's the difference of Shem's and Yafet's attitude towards God. Interestingly, these attitudes of the 3 brothers are still visible in the cultures of the world, as you mentioned. Shem's love of God is the best way of course. But it has it's problems too. If their love turns towards something else than God, they become violent, and passionately doing other wrong things. Well, that's the truth of all the nations: if we don't love God, we devote our attention to other things we start to worship: be it many gods, human mind, money, food, entertainment... Even good things like family ca become idols, false gods for us - if they come instead of God. Good shouldn't replace the best. But that's the mistake we mostly do.

@Hungary #1 Almost every race had their own pa gan beliefs before christianity came to them, that can't be a reason

@@timomastosalo , у нас говорят: лучшее - враг хорошего ) Сюжет с Евой повествует как раз об этом. Всё было очень хорошо. Но змей предложил вариант получше ) Скушай таблеточку антидепрессанта, и в один миг, станешь Президентом США! )

@@user-eb4qk9lx3m More like the opposite: good is the opposite of the best. God called it good. But if something is already good - you can't make it better, like Satan suggested. And Satans's suggestion was even more. He suggested we can become like God. That would mean we wouldn't 'need God' - if we could be like him. And that lie tricked us. This is what Humanism, Darwinism tries to preach us :) And we so easily believe. Because it is flattering. The oldest business trick. PS. The plot was not with Eve ... only. Adam was with him. But stayed silent when the snake was lying to her. How often we men do that? Stay silent when somebody is mistreating the woman? You notice when Eve picked the fruit, she gave to her husband also ... who was with her. So God came first to question Adam, what he had done. He was primarily in charge, but started to blame other people fo his mistake. Sounds familiar :)

China is atheistic

true

it's not?? i think its distantly related

@@lexxypexxy2831 it's theorised, but unconfirmed and unlikely.

@@lexxypexxy2831 And altaic is a Sprachbund, not a family.

@@maxi6457 oh geez. It is not a "sprachbund" I suggest you reading on the Transeurasian hypothesis by Martine Robbeets.

di mon

Kuulin äänen

+Idriis Sany Thank you

If nouns are "gendered" or not has nothing to do with Logic. And I hope you dont think that grammatical genders have something to do with biological etc. Genders. They absolutely don't. Even linguists nowadays say that calling it "genders" is wrong. They say it would be better to call em noun forms or the like. You can find some research about this topic and about the origin of grammatical "genders". They are following a logic rule. Maybe calling it "genders" is the illogical thing here but not the noun forms itself.

I partly agree. I speak with fluency French and German which both use genders. To designate people, the gender is important and in most of the case shows whether the person is a woman or a man, for example 'un instituteur, une institutrice' (a teacher) and 'ein Schüler, eine Schülerin'. So yes, when we mention a person, the gender of the noun usually tells if we are speaking about a women or a man. However, when we mention objects or abstract elements, it's sure that the gender has nothing related with a male or a female.

Agreed, Tabor 7!

What about this? English is a gendered language, but in a sensible way: male persons are masculine, female persons are feminine and all other nouns are neuter. We therefore don't need to worry about whether "moon" or "table", for example, are masculine or feminine - quite reasonable given that they're clearly neither male nor female. We thus save foreign learners of English endless difficulties.

@@edwardkeats5537 That's not what gendered language means. Appointing random genders to all nouns is what we linguists consider as having a gender. English is not a gendered language. All languages use different names for women an men in certain contexts in order to indicate the gender of whomever people are talking about. For example, the word "woman" does naturally indicate the gender, it has to. All languages recorded has this feature. But that does not mean that English or all languages is/are (a) gendered language(s). You seem to misunderstand the concept of "gendered language".

Sami are mix between finno-ugric and pre indo-european though.

what do mean by saying "pre-germanic peoples are older than finno ugric". What do mean older?? and what common have these to groups? I mean they are to totally different languare families. And finno ugric people are located in east and north, but germanic are in westeurope.

armzngunz do you really know how original Turks looked like? Ask Chinese and Russian governments to release all mummies that they found. Uralic people, Turks and Mongols all are coming from Altai

+Герда от Венгрии Yes, Nordo-Germanic languages may even originate from Paleolithic Scandinavian languages. The migration of Uralic-speakers is different. +Ulix A The Mongols may have originated from a part of Altai, but the Hunno-Turkic peoples originated from Central Asia, and Uralic people from the Ural region.

False , they have no connection with the indo Europeans,

Kuulin äänen

punkgeon and moksha in volga finns

Darude-Sandstorm

U ar finn?

It's not Finno-Uralic either. It's Finno-Ugric, or Uralic if you include the Samoyedic languages, or don't believe that there are separate Finnic and Ugric branches in the family.

Uralic-Altaic Family Groups !

@F0RG1V3N well nobody even claim they are 'indo-european'.

@F0RG1V3N indo european only a theory only political lies not real

@@Saiputera I do. Specifically Germanic and Celtic.

Thank you! Proud to be Finnish! 🇫🇮

Magyars has nothing to do with cumans. Cumans came into Hungary in the 1200's, when Hungary was already a kingdom.

I thought the magyars were Finno-Ugric tribes from the Urals. Thats' why the language is Uralic not Turkic. Turkic and Mongol were neighbours, but not same thing.

@@BlueFace33388 Who fuck are you???

@A Curious Engineer No

Definitely agree, we are not related to the Finns. we are only in relation to the Turkish people. you'll be russian or european and disappear

Lol no one wants to be relatives with poor hungarian people. Turan also doesn't include every Altaic people too. It just includes real Turkic nations. Go learn history dumbass.

@@sila9431 Why are you so angry? We have nothing to do with you. This is just a Turkish lie. (and: Why do you want to be European? Maybe you are not proud of your Arab ancestors?) Don't insult the magyars, just because nobody want to be turks. Brainless!

@@fjfjdjkeekksksjdnsn3625 You are very ignorant and uneducated. Turks are not Arabs. Arabs are Semitic people, just like the Jews. Turkic people do not originate from the Middle-East, they are from Central Asia and North-East Asia (Siberia), just like the Huns/Magyars. This has been proven through genetic testing. Many Turks have traces of the same genetic markers as Finns, which shows that there is a genetic connection between Finns, Magyars and Turkic people. You really need to get yourself educated because ignorance is not bliss.

It is debated, currently the safest bet is that Proto-Uralic and Proto-Yukaghir languages evolved from the same language family, but linguists aren't sure

No they aren't. It's suggested but popularly not considered a valid suggestion. Most paleo-linguists believe Proto-Uralic and Proto-Indoeuropean languages have a common proto-language. But it haven't been proven either.

***** that is not even close

They speak Sami dialects and a bit of Swedish. Most people speak Finnish though and most of the population is concentrated in the South.

91% of Finland speaks Finnish 5% Swedish 4% something else (mostly Russian or Estonian)

@@FlamingAnimation Sami, not Russian or Estonian. Karelian is also present.

@@Nordisk11 There is less than 2 000 Sami languages speakers in Finland, and about 20 000 - 30 000 Sami speakers altogether, most of them live in Norway. It's rather a political question if Karelian is a language or a Finnish dialect than a linguistic question. It's been considered a Finnish dialect before, but nowadays some consider it another language, and since 2011 in Finland you have been able to select it as your first language. About 10 000 people in Finland understand Karelian language, and about 5 000 speak as their first language.

Exactly.

No, though they may be related to them

Aynen demiyordur cunku aynen turkceye arapcadan girmis bir kelimedir yani arapca

@@sura5174 biliyorum ama benzettim biraz😂

No.

Yes

@@user-op8gi2rp6u no

Actually Hungarians are Turks just came to Europe earlier than the Turks did

You guys don't know shit.If you are a Hungarian then you have the ancestry of the original Hungarian fathers.No bullshitting.

yeah, this video has more to do with language than genetics, however.

Immigration stinks !

***** I would think Japanese people are a pure race.

You're confused.

@@user-iu3jc3su9k He's not wrong, though. Even without N, Uralics have lots of Siberian genes.

@@finnicpatriot6399 My family has ancestry from Southern China, mainly southern Fujian province. I did a 23andme test, a WeGene test and both came back as Haplogroup N-L665 and/or Haplogroup N1b-P43

Most of the modern Europeans' forefathers have come from Siberia to Europe. Haplogroup N developped in Siberia about 12 000 - 8000 years ago. Haplogroup N's ancestor NO possibly developped in South-East Asia about 20 000 years ago.

Paleo-Asian? Mongolia and Western China were inhabited by Europoids (Caucasians) during the Paleolithic Stone Age. It was the Xiongnu Empire 300BC - 100AD that conquered Mongolia and drove iranian and Indian peoples away from there. In fact, ANCIENT NORTH EURASIAN (ANE) DNA is based on "Mal'ta boy" who lived in Mongolia near Lake Baikal 30 000 years ago. ANE-people make about 75% of EASTERN EUROPEAN HUNTER-GATHERER (EHG) DNA, and about 50% of PROTO-INDOEUROPEAN (PIE) DNA. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_North_Eurasian en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xiongnu Indoeuropean peoples that lived in Mongolia and West China, include for example: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andronovo_culture en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordos_culture en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tocharians en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saka en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuezhi

+Rika Furude maybe, but i don't think so: the emishi (or ainu if you want) of the jomon period, being an insular civilization with little technology, are really unlikely to have spread a proto-japanese language accross Asia and the southern pacific. it is most likely that all of these languages are descendant of one big language that spread when the japanese arcipelago wasn't split from the continent, but all possibilities should be considered:)

+Francesco Anziutti Again, no they're not. Proto-uralic originated in europe you fuck: "After the rejection of the continuity theories, the recent linguistic arguments have placed the Proto-Uralic homeland around the Kama River, or more generally close to the Great Volga Bend and the Ural Mountains". Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Uralic_homeland_hypotheses The uralic language family is not asian! Fucking get that!

are you afraid to discover your asiatic grandma???

+James Bond i was talking about ASIA and the SOUTHERN PACIFIC, i was not referring in any way to the uralic family of languages

+James Bond also, calm down. using a lot of insults followed by "fuck" doesn't make you cooler, nor does it make you intellectually superior

And why do you think that these other languages are influenced by other languages? They are complitelty different from europan languages. Sami, suomi (finnish), kareliya, estonia, vepsä, ingerian and others are quite close to each other but not influenced to much from other languages.

They are the LEAST pure Uralic language lmao. They originally spoke a non-uralic language, but adopted finnic and bastardised it with their original words and grammar. Sámi is the MOST foreign influenced language of the bunch.

@@ratapa3496 so the english of the finno ugric branch

@@finnicpatriot6399 also what do you fucking mean by them speaking a non uralic language when they are uralic.

Sami-languages are thought to have common origin with Finnish: the Finno-Samic (also Early Proto-Finnish and in Finnish varhaiskantasuomi). Anyway the Sami people also are thought to have spoken different language before Early Proto-Finnish arrived into Finland. So Sami languages aren't older than Finnish language.

🤣🤣🤣 HAHAHAHA

I meant endangered.

Сами они живы. И язык ещё сохранился, но мало, может человек 100 им владеет

Nope

Very few people speak it, maybe about 100

Uralics aren't nomadic, they were hunter-gatherers and farmers.

The hungarians not mainly descendants of the huns,Attila and Co. no main ancestor of modern hungarians.

It didn't develop independently. We have higher amounts of aryan admixture (mostly from east balts and indo-aryans) than Swedes do.

He is unironically right. Swedes are albino Indians, you are albino Mongoloids.

Aryans are Indo-Iranians. Mongolia and Western China was inhabited by Europoids (Caucasians) until Xiongnu empire conquered Mongolia and drove indo-european languages speaking peoples away from there 300BC - 100AD. Ancient North Eurasian (ANE) people are based on "Mal'ta boy" DNA, he lived in Mongolia 30 000 years ago. The ANE-people are forefathers of Eastern European hunter-gatherers (EHG) and Proto-Indoeuropeans. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_North_Eurasian en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xiongnu Indoeuropeans who lived in Mongolia and Western China include for example: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andronovo_culture en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordos_culture en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tocharians en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saka en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuezhi

The Ural and many Siberian peoples are a conglomerate that began to form long before the Roman Empire from three streams of tribes that marched for centuries and millennia from east to west through the Urals, opposite from west to east beyond the Urals, as well as the flow of tribes from the territory where modern Iran is now moving to the North. Later the Romans called the Huns. At some historical moment, they began to get both the Roman Empire and China, which fenced itself off from them with a wall. The Roman Empire withstood the onslaught by defeating them, but still the Huns played an important role in the further collapse of the Roman Empire. And two more interesting facts: the self-name of the Hungarians is Hungar); as well as the matrix of genetic distances of 11 human populations of Europe, Asia and America was calculated 28 alleles of 12 loci of proteins, enzymes and blood groups. The dendrogram built on this matrix showed a certain relationship between European and North Asian peoples, as well as American Indians. The calculated matrix of genetic distances of 55 human populations and the construction of a microevolutionary dendrogram of these populations of Europe, Asia, America, Africa and Oceania confirmed this relationship. Comparison of these data with common haplogroups of mitochondrial DNA in Europeans, Altaians, and American Indians suggested that these ethnic groups originated from the same ancestral Asian Paleolithic population. Anthropological data on the discovery of Paleolithic bone remains of Caucasians in Siberia support the hypothesis. The Finno-Ugric peoples have common ancestors who came from the Far East. Migration path of the Finno-Ugric peoples @//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_N-M231#/media/File:Prehistoric_migration_routes_for_Y-chromosome_haplogroup_N_lineage.png Finno-Ugric Y-DNA haplogroup N1c @//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_N-M231 Checking the phylogeny of N1c at the following link. their root @//www.eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_N1c_Y-DNA.shtml

+Skulls and Bones "fact"

Suvi-Tuuli Allan Absolutely

germanic and finnic people have similar genetic. germanic people are different to the rest of europeans. germanic have much finno-uralic blood.

Suomi_FIN do you even science?

Suvi-Tuuli Allan it is the result of dna and genetic test. also the pre-germnic supstrat support that. surley they are germanic and we finno-uralic, but compared to other people finno-uralic people and germanic people are connected. for example hungarians speak a uralic language but are geneticaly different to finno-uralic. only some similarities. hungarians also have turkic genetic. it is still not sure where the origin of uralic is. but most linguists accept that finnish is the nearest language to proto-uralic. hungarian has much turkic loanwords and influence. and i don´t mean we have same DNA like germanics but similar compared for example with italians

+James Bond can you shut your fucking mouth here wtff is wrong with you

+DarklightSpirit It's not my problem that this comment section is full off wannabee-linguistics lol. Ural-altaic is considered obsolete, so can you people stop making ridiculous claims, thanks?

James Bond you leave the impression of someone who thinks he knows it all, noone will take you serious this way

+james bond. yes, you are right. ural-altaic don´t exist. this are turkic propaganda. fuck altaic/turan from suomi

Suomi_FIN I'm Finnish and the only reason you disbelieve it is because you have emotions holding you back. It's pretty obvious that Uralic and Altaic people were the same group once. Genetics back this up.

Lmao

@@ShamanOGHUZ3 Hungary isn't in the council because they're turks lmao, it's only because of Orbán's political interests.

@@tommeiner9983 I get a reply after 2 years .. whatever dude .. I know my truth, you keep believing to your own. 👍

@@ShamanOGHUZ3 there's only one truth, as a Hungarian I know how my country works and who we are better than some random turk

@@tommeiner9983 I can definitely see that, wondering under a Uralic video : ) Looking for something? Just sounded quite sure of everything a little while ago... bye Attila ohh.. tom 👍

Moron, before Rurik arrive Russia have 5m Slavic population already

Иди и возбуждай свой туран под одеялом..

Fuck off

şad Oruc He says that Ugric and Altaic are two separate things dumbass eurotards

@@hmmmhmmm6917 fucking European idiot 😂😂

Ural Altai is bullshit

They are; nganasans are also, but unfortunately weren't included in video

@@-andreiDNA Nope, they aren't. It's been suggested but most paleo-linguists don't consider it a valid theory. Instead Proto-Uralic and Proto-Indoeuropean are widely believed to have a common proto-language, but it haven't been proven either. Nganasan is part of Samoyed group, so it is part of the Uralic language family.

no

@@Aurinkohirvi P*ss off and don't be too intelligent

"Uralic" is about their place of origin, not their current location. Hungarians had a longer period of nomadism and migrated further in Europe (for example, in comparison with Finns). Thus, their language absorbed a lot from their neighbors and from those peoples who met them on the way

The Ural and many Siberian peoples are a conglomerate that began to form long before the Roman Empire from three streams of tribes that marched for centuries and millennia from east to west through the Urals, opposite from west to east beyond the Urals, as well as the flow of tribes from the territory where modern Iran is now moving to the North. Later the Romans called the Huns. At some historical moment, they began to get both the Roman Empire and China, which fenced itself off from them with a wall. The Roman Empire withstood the onslaught by defeating them, but still the Huns played an important role in the further collapse of the Roman Empire. And two more interesting facts: the self-name of the Hungarians is Hungar); as well as the matrix of genetic distances of 11 human populations of Europe, Asia and America was calculated 28 alleles of 12 loci of proteins, enzymes and blood groups. The dendrogram built on this matrix showed a certain relationship between European and North Asian peoples, as well as American Indians. The calculated matrix of genetic distances of 55 human populations and the construction of a microevolutionary dendrogram of these populations of Europe, Asia, America, Africa and Oceania confirmed this relationship. Comparison of these data with common haplogroups of mitochondrial DNA in Europeans, Altaians, and American Indians suggested that these ethnic groups originated from the same ancestral Asian Paleolithic population. Anthropological data on the discovery of Paleolithic bone remains of Caucasians in Siberia support the hypothesis. The Finno-Ugric peoples have common ancestors who came from the Far East. Migration path of the Finno-Ugric peoples @//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_N-M231#/media/File:Prehistoric_migration_routes_for_Y-chromosome_haplogroup_N_lineage.png Finno-Ugric Y-DNA haplogroup N1c @//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_N-M231 Checking the phylogeny of N1c at the following link. their root @//www.eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_N1c_Y-DNA.shtml