I really would love to see a Starfinder game personally.

Rogue Trader DLC. Hands down.

the time is ripe for somebody making another shadowrun

I would take anything Pathfinder from them!

Rogue Trader is actually their best selling game for this place in the cycle. They hit 500k sales by the beginning of February, iirc. I love Rogue Trader, even if you do need a spreadsheet with pivot tables to understand a character build. Gotta love all the “+1.3% to damage, stacks per attack on days where your character is wearing polka dot boxers, stacks double if your character ate ham for lunch but stacks only 1.5 if it was honey ham instead of black Forrest ham, something something +PythagoreanTheorem to critical hit chance” abilities. I’m all in for whatever they do next. Yeah, their have their quirks. They are a little overambitious in scope. They use their first few months of a release as an early release. They always have to add minigames. There’s always a power fantasy. But you can tell their games are made with a ton of passion/care, and you can tell they know what they want their games and their style to be. If you’d played Kingmaker and Wrath of the Righteous and then spent a few hours with Rogue Trader, you’d know they made it even if the game didn’t say it. I’m sure their next will be Rogue Trader DLC for a while. In! (And for anyone who hasn’t played it, give it a shot, the companions and world building really grows on you, as does the humor; the aftermath of sexytime with Jae is the funniest/most absurd romance thing I’ve ever seen in a game, by an order of magnitude)

I'd certainly like another pathfinder game. I'm also interested in learning more about it's lore through your videos

I went from Wotr to Kingmaker and enjoyed it a lot. It honesty dosen't need to one up on the power scale every game. Just have a well written and engaging story and plot. Thats really all there is too it.

BattleTech. There is already an RPG rule system for it, and it would be nice to get a glimpse at the universe that is not inside a 'Mech 100% of the time.

I would like them to give substance to and perfect the last two chapters of Rogue Trader. It was a *really nice* adventure that fell very short.

Wrath of the Righteous was like a drug when I first got it, I couldn't put it down. The amonut of class customization, the story and characters had me hooked. And then the mythic paths were just the cherry on top.

I don't care much for the Dungeon and Dragons universe. In regards to the downscaling from WOTLK level of power scaling. I don't mind it: Once the game is polished and offers good story and mechanics, Owlcat will have my support. Also... I think you might have missed just how much WOTC rubbed Owlcat the wrong way during the whole DnD licensing fiasco that happened recently. Owlcat evenn publicly denounced the move.

Personally, although I liked WOTR a lot, I'm enjoying Rogue Trader more and hope they'll produce DLCs for that game. But I'll be happy with more owlcat crpgs in any other IP and even in a universe of their own .

Starfinder please and thank you.

Would like more Pathfinder stuff.

A Starfinder 1e CRPG would be fantastic

I still want to want to vote for Shadowrun! This a wonderful setting in between fantasy and cyberpunk and it is missing a current gaming development company.

Starfinder. I want sci-fi without the grimdark. Or 5E -- I'd love to see them adapt some of the official modules from 5E. I'm sure it will be more Pathfinder though.

I want more Rogue Trader. Didn't know Warhammer existed, learned the lore simply for the game and having a blast.

They should pester Microsoft into letting them use the Arcanum license.

Skulls and Shackles. Please. I will pre order it now

They need to work on releasing the rest of those WotR Collector's editions. I'd like to see them work on original projects, as they've built up their reputation over the last three games. They need to really get better about removing bugs before release though, as it seems to be their greatest weakness

Being a pretty long term Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay player at this point in time, I would love a WFRP game. Enemy Within, or just an original story would be cool.

A pathfinder Engine with inbuilt mutliplayer support/ gm support. Also a DLC system that allows them to release campaigns as DLC using the already established infrastructure.

Old school fallout game or cyberpunk. Rogue trader shows they can handle shooting mechanics If you want swords and sorcery there is warhammer fantasy Also castlevania themed setting for more supernatural stuff

Since I prefer high fantasy, that's what I'd like to see next. Couldn't Owlcat use the free 5e license like Tactical Adventures did with Solasta?

Owlcat could do a VERY good Shadowrun, Cyberpunk Red or another Pathfinder 2E game. But if it is a Pathfinder game they have to add party play with friends like BG3.

I pretty much agree with all the statements you've made in the video. I would love owlcat games in forgotten realms setting, however knowing how badly wotc treats everyone i don't see that happening. I heard some rumours about another studio making a pathfinder 2e game that should be either confirmed or debunked on 24th of may. Would be insanely excited if that's true

I'd like to see Owlcat remake the classic old SSI gold box games like Pool of radiance etc, but that would require cutting a deal with WOTC unfortunately. Otherwise i would love them to continue evolving and churning out Pathfinder stuff, either 1st or 2nd edition. The WH40K setting simply does not resonate with me at all.

I will never forget the travesty Commorragh was. If they make another game and put in a "get-captured-you-lose-all-your-items" sequence (khm Khorramzadeh in wotr) I might commit arson in minecraft

They seem like such a talented studio, just, for the life of me, my ADHD just cannot handle their games not being fully voiced.

upgrading their previous games to BG3 style graphics and cutscenes would do wonder for them I think

Anyone know where the thumbnail is from?

Hopefully they'll get BG4 after Larian pulled out or new PF. Or better yet, their own ip.

Vampire the masquerade deserve a good crpg.

i just want to see anything on pf 2e or the starfinder 2e instead of anything on first edition. it has been a great experience now the im actually playing a campaign in that system.

Ossian studio is working on a pathfinder 2E game pretty sure Owlcat wants to take a break from pathfinder for now but I'd like to see a starfinder game

I just want dlc that changes rules to 2e for Wrath and Kingmaker.

To be honest I would like to have bg4 from Owlcat.

I would love to see them do Pathfinder: Giant Slayer, but as 2ed. would also love to see Starfinder, Shadowrun or Battletech (blended RPG and tatical combat, like Cresent Hawk Inseption).

D&D 5e. We need more games from The Forgotten Realm's universe.

40K, this time in the Calixis sector

Another suggestion. How about EA will get rid of the Bioware hask that is trying to give birth to Dragon Age 4, and will give Dragon age to Owlcats. It could be returning to the Dragon Age Origins.

Which game is the best to start with ? Kingmaker or path of righteous `?

The mythic abilities added so much replayability, also the quality of life stuff like 'greater enduring spells' would be hard for me to due without. WOTR was too epic for a 2nd game, they should have built up to it, any thing after will seem sorta meh, like a step back. Still PF1 would still be my choice, Though PF2 could be interesting.

Shadowrun or Fallout 1 remake. Both of these go through Microsoft, I dont know if they are viable, just what I would choose if I had any say.

Some advice from someone who loves paradox grand strategy games. EU5 is currently in development and looks amazing having learnt the lesson of what im about to say. But when EU4 was released people considered it EU3.5 and over the course of 10 years and DLC it become EU4 and now its arguably EU4.5 in scope. I say this because when CK2 went to CK3 it has been a bit rocky and when Vic2 went to Vic3 it has a lot of issues. Issues in the games not feeling complete, feeling like its only the .5 of a sequel that lacks in depth gameplay/systems that feel like a sequel and feel like a sequel in that it will be compared to the previous game with the inherent bias that the DLCs will be included. I say this because if Owlcat do a sequel to Pathfinder, it may feel this way if the release game doesnt have enough indepth content. If the game feels lack luster it will hamper its development to grow its new player base away from the old game. Its a concern I havent heard many people talk about in this space and one to take note of

Honestly I feel pathfinder WOTR was the absolute BEST rendition of a Lich in a video game to date. I'm ready to support Owlcat no matter what.

Do your poll again but include Starfinder in the list. I think it could show competitive with WH:40K for desirability. Beyond that, the fact that so many would want Owlcat to do a 5E D&D game is just sad. That's like asking them to make a mobile game. Insulting.

Crazy take. Owlcat makes Tyranny 2. Obsidian was bought by microsoft and the Tyranny IP is owned by Paradox swedish publisher. Obsidian will never make a sequel to it unless Microsoft buys the IP from Paradox. If owlcat wants to try something fresh that is not pathfinder or games workshop they can try to make a sequel to Tyranny by parterning with Paradox Interactive.

Shadowrun?

In my opinion Rogue trader is a good game but WoR is great and one of the best CRPGs ever

While this video is based around an entirely wrong premise. I do agree Pathfinder would be good as the next game. I would vote for Thassalonia or Cheliax. However as I said - Rogue Trader had a massive launch with a lot of 40k Channels inviting people into it. Reaching the highest sales and showing Owlcat to 40k community which is the largest consolidated fanbase now. Pathfinder is sadly more of a 1% thing these days. Warhammer 40k is the new majority like Star Wars or Dune. Also - As much as I like Pathfinder for its combat and setting as fantasy. I find that Rogue Trader is a major improvement on the story side of things (and its only just begun its DLC cycle). Owlcat Games get better with time by a huge margin. If Wrath stayed at its launch variant, it would honestly not be a good game without Extended Edition reworks of mythic paths and additional content. What we also call the Baldurs Gate 3 effect is not real. Baldur is not a good CRPG, it will not invite people into D&D or Pathfinder by proxy. People play BG 3 because its "sort of Mass Effect in fantasy". Its popularity is purely based around the characters, voice acting but the story, setting and all around it is very.. mid. Skulls coming out in 2 days meaning all the Warhammer community will be up in arms and will get new stuff for Rogue Trader at the Games Workshop event.

My personal wish is warhammer fantasy game, 40k is cool and all but fantasy i just a way more interesting setting for me

thx

This is soo random but i wish they made heroes of might and magic 8

I recently started playing CRPGs, I didn't have the chance when I was growing up, I started with Pillars of Eternity, I finished it and I liked it a lot and I've already bought Deadfire I tried Baldurs Gate 3 and I've had 75 hours and I still don't really like it, I'll try the originals Baldurs gate first or maybe some Pathfinder 😅

oh you mean the same studios who add season passes and dlcs... XD

Can only imagine this result because not that many really knows more about 2e, and that's why I think DnD5e got a higher vote, with much to thank BG3. Personally I haven't played 2e but I've looked into the ruleset and classes a LOT, and it's definately above DnD5e for me.

Ummmm me thinks you are under selling rouge traders reception pretty hard

Simple: Warhammer the Old World RPG!

I'd like very much to see more Pathfinder games, but with Second Edition rules. 2e is much more combat heavy and streamlined than 1e/D&D3.5 even to a point of being "too gamey" on the table (think of 4e, but done right). I just hope they pick up an original Adventure Path of Owlcat's creation like they did in Rogue Trader because PF2e Adventure Paths simply don't hit as good as 1e ones. Age of Ashes is extremely boring with unremarkable NPCs that don't add up to the story, and all other are too Specifically Thematic like Exctintion Curse on Circus and Strenght of Thousands on the Magic School.

There are a few layers on this one for me. Mechanically, I think Owlcat does bad job at balancing. And the more things they invent on their own, the less balanced the game becomes. 3.5ed always had balancing issues that are further increased by Pathfinder ruleset (power creep) and by the enormous experience people have with 3.5 (often 20+ years). Owlcat did somewhat passable job in Kingmaker but I think it's due to minimal input of their own balancing. But with mythical paths and their own spin on balance it's a mess. I seriously think that around 10-13 level in WotR they should change the dice used from D20 to D100 without any other numerical changes, if they wanted to have any semblance of balance. This is somewhat confirmed when they tried to put their own spin on Rogue Trader - they put so many multiplier bonuses in there that it's practically impossible to balance as well - you either have the correct build that scales to god power-level or you get annihilated by enemies who scale up to almost god-like power-level. In WotC they don't have multiplier but they also have a tendency for balancing that makes the dice throw irrelevant - you either always hit with a correct build, except a 1 roll, or you always miss with incorrect build, except for a nat 20. And in Owlcat's Pathfinder games there is a very thin, practically unachievable margin, where a D20 roll matters outside 1 or 20 roll. Mechanically, I'd like Owlcat to go with a new system that has balancing somewhat well done and I think Pathfinder 2ed would be perfect for that. Just don't allow Owlcat to make any changes to systems. This way we don't need super mythical and heroic adventures with new, unbalanced mechanics and we could restart with normal mechanics without being bored by something done dozens of times already. Lore-wise, I very much liked WH40k and I always wanted to play a game in this world with focus on roleplaying. I also think there is wealth of options in 40k universe for storytelling and I'd love to visit this universe again. At the same time, I strongly dislike Pathfinder/Starfinder universe. Creators wanted to put too much in there and it resembles a gray goo at this point. I think Owlcat did great job at extracting what is interesting in Pathfinder while ignoring the parts that make Pathfinder a gray goo but there is a limit to what can be done with this. I doubt it'd be possible to have 40k game with Pathfinder 2ed ruleset. I'd love to revisit 40k but I wouldn't trust Owlcat with balancing. And implementing 2ed ruleset in Warhammer may not be the best fit for 40k). So I think the best option would be to have Owlcat use Pathfinder 2ed rules, but set it in original universe of their own. But I wouldn't mind using some lesser known, generally unutilised setting - like Earthdown. (but I'd love to play another roleplaying-focused 40k game)

For me, rouge trader was a better experience than pathfinder. So.. more rouge trader 😅

Game at launch was a complete mess on the xbox, glad to see they turned it around and its become a classic.

I absolutely love Rogue Trader and and am proud to see my name in the backers of it. As a 40k fan, I was incredibly excited to see its first true rpg from the makers of WOTR. The problem with Rogue Trader is its scope. The mechanics and world are great, but you don't have the mythic paths and incredible story choice and reactivity. In WOTR the story of a a demon is vastly different than the Angel mythic path for instance. Thats what was needed in Rogue Trader. Falling to Chaos should be vastly different than playing as defender of the Imperium. Im hoping that the dlc for Rogue Trader beefs up the story versatility, but no matter what, WOTR is simply a bigger, bolder game which is why it will be preferred to Rogue Trader.

I think the basic problem with Warhammer 40k is that it is a "war time" sci-fi, which, imho, just isn't going to draw in as wide an audience. Specifically, I suspect it doesn't play as well with female gamers. The Warhammer 40k settings is just a very male centric universe. Its a depressing world, dominated by masculine figures, who fight dirty because they don't have a choice. Whereas when you look at just who is streaming a game like BG3, you see a very diverse crowd. Anyone can imagine themselves (or some version of themselves that they would like to be) in the that game setting. Its gothic, or high fantasy, or low fantasy, or romantic, or... Whatever type of game setting you want. And that flexibility, to me, along with some great story telling, is what brought in the crowds. The accessibility and widespread familiarity with D&D5e certainly helped.

Owlcat choose the wrong Warhammer property. They would be more successuful with Warhammer Fantasy

Personally I love(d) WH40 IP, but didn't buy the rogue trader game even tho I do want to support the studio, why? The combat, I prefer real time with pause over the pure turn based while Rogue trader even has a strict grid and I like that even less, so couldn't bring myself to play it.

Simple answer from me: Don't care what's next. Just make a balanced-tested rpg. I like good game design. I will buy if good. I approach RPG like I do with fighting games: if it's broken and the system is broken I avoid it unless there is a good story. There are two types of players: 1. those who play for good gameplay mechanics. 2. those who play for immersion and for story. I tend to care about the former more. That is why I can play adventure games like Zelda Breath of the Wild and Zelda Tears of the Kingdom without caring about the characters or the story. In the old days stories were just put in games to give you an excuse to go into dungeons and kill monsters and the fun was planning how to get out of it alive and the power you felt obtaining loot and selling stuff to get more gold. (the journey is more important than the reward) But as time went on story became people's reasons to play games. (thus you started seeing features in Grand Theft Auto games starting with 5 where a player could skip the gameplay if it was too hard LOL)

They should stay far away from warhammer 40k rogue trader was awful and launched ina basically unplayable state. It had the most boring abilities I’ve ever seen. Just a bunch of people pointing at each other. If it wasn’t set in the 40k universe it would be hammered

Hopefully they will not drag to the mud any other major IP :P