I like destiny better

I think that it could be good, however, if it ends up becoming like mobile ftp where you pay to not be shit on all the time i think it will be bad. if it doesnt end up like this, i think it could make games much more popular, especially with people who cant afford to buy several each year. personally, i dont like the battle royal format, but i can understand why others do.

I love you and this intro was so good

Its negative, because all of this will lead to another cycle of all developers making one type of game (BRs)and everyone getting sick of them. Honestly surprised Abortion 76 hasnt tried to make a BR with their building mechanic

Negative. It promotes even further the trend of games as a service and drives more companies into that mindset. Less publishers are willing to take on traditional single player games and instead focus on "the new thing" that they can monetize into the ground.

Wrong.

Current life too

Not really

Most competent people can string together a pretty sentence with a thesaurus. E.g.) Recreational merriment squanders the appetite of an unmarked mind; Blithely diminishing the repro of ones imagination in this fabrication we consider entertainment... see what I mean? Ask how long it took him to string together this game theory. Then ask if it was worth it.

@@jonathanrees1390 Jesus Christ you need to get laid

yup

Same here

A whole fucking lot lmaooo

But entertaining

I clicked on it because it was in my recomended for a while. I was hooked by that overly detail story in the begining and than impressed by how deep of an analysis on the current state of the gaming industry he made.

I'm very surprised this comment isn't at the top

Dude when he said that, i fucking lost it. best quote of 2019

If he’s saying that ninja is for kids then I guess it’s a good insult but the Wiggles were the shit so I’m kind of offended he’d dare to connect ninja to them 😤

@@_D_W_ Like, I think it's less about the core audience being kids and more about how they achieved similar saturation among that intended audience; he could have substituted the Wiggles with a nearly endless list of previous juggernauts (as an example, the jonas brothers) and it would've been the same argument. Like, you can walk up to basically any kid in a western country and, unless they've lived the most sheltered life imaginable, they are going to be AT ABSOLUTE MINIMUM aware of ninja's content and the exact same situation would've probably played out if you targeted kids in the 90s and possibly early 2000s and asked them about the Wiggles (although I'd argue that the Wiggles might not have had quite as much saturation just due to how the world was only starting to become heavily interconnected and we hadn't reached quite the point where groups like the Wiggles could transcend past the reliance on the traditional marketing machine). In both cases you'd have people who are fans, people who are detractors, and people who are just bystanders that don't have any horse in the race despite knowing about the subject. I think that's what he was trying to say, that they're comparable in how much sheer influence they have.

qz.com/1391718/fortnite-video-game-cited-as-cause-of-5-of-uk-divorces/

​@@darellarocho5729 4.3% of divorce petitions (not necessarily actual divorces) from one source and "did not specify how Fortnite contributed to the separations".

@@Ax1007 I just sited the source because he wanted to know where it came from. I never read it nor do I care, I was simply giving him what he was asking for.

@@darellarocho5729 I think the person implied a reliable source lol

@@darellarocho5729 I think he was making a joke about Wikipedia and did not actually want a source

Zane Truesdale Shhh... it’s ok. The mystery is the fun part, no?

It's a fun game mode. Red Dead Redemption could add one for example. The question is, is it economical for the publisher to include a BR mode? I wish Amazon had a cheap solution/service for this type of problem. BR is not the problem or a problem. It is essentially a massive PVP game mode. Are game modes to blame if some games aren't selling well? Heck you could probably make a chess BR is you're willing enough or have the resources to make one, ofcourse not all games with a BR mode would become a hit.

YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO SAME

same here. about halfway in i was wondering what happened.

I felt the nier automata effect too, first I’m like haha ok then by the end I had that same existential crisis

video stars: crazy drug filled ramble that will melt your brain some time passes video: lies and falsehoods about games and gamers that only stupid people like the guy who made this comment will fall for

@@barrettbirks1058 Hey great comment sonic

@@Solidlauti your welcome L

@@barrettbirks1058 and you kind sir can point those lies and falsehoods and share some facts and truth, huh? Not once i heard that he claimed his analysis and hypothesis were true. I saw it was more likely a conversation starter and one-man perspective on things. Very well thought one actually. But we are fortunate that we have you here to give some facts to this conversation. That what you want to do, right? You weren't here just whacking your enourmous virtual-"i know better but i won't tell you"-penis?

@@The7bl you want truth, alright, look up a list of the games that made the most money last year, yes there are some games there that are always online, but most of them are single player, single player isn't going anywhere, block buster game aren't going anywhere, why would people like EA just stop making huge single player money makers? maybe I am waking my penis, but I'm spraying truth all over your face

@Czech Paratrooper ???

@Czech Paratrooper lol where in the video is "alot of bad political narrative"?

All of his videos are like this it’s crazy

@@TockerBeb Incredibly true. Notice how there is often a lack of scale or context to much of what he is speaking about. For example, he keeps referring to the "middle class, rich, and poor" without clear definitions, and more egregiously keeps referring to sears downfall as one due to economic inequality instead poor business practices.

It's pretty good. He clearly saw Fear and Loathing in Los Vegas before making this.

Intro: Kinda weird and gross

Video ending... i hope to never hear your voice again....

Video intro: are you fucking high? Video ending: your a fucking layer

I really like Nintendo but their games are just super expensive I will still buy Pokémon and animal crossing but some games aren’t worth 60-70€ 🤷‍♂️

@@TeleTorben this is subjective, while you may think a game isn't worth a specific value, another might say it is. The better graphics might be enough for some people to enjoy the games. Pokemon hasn't had a main pokemon game on a console and animal crossing hasn't been on a console for ages. So, really, just those facts alone might be enough for people to pay full price.

Gotta love console exclusivity, milking old games by destroying and using emulator sites, artificially limiting supply, breaking apart fan games, and not supporting their games' scenes. Plus botw and odyssey were both jumping on the open world trend.

@@littlebigphil One, Zelda was ORIGINALLY open world to begin with, SECONDLY Odyssey isn't far of from Mario 64 just an evolution of it. Lastly, Console exist because not everyone can afford to pay thousands of dollars to make sure their pc can play a game, not to mention the HACKERS. finally, everyone on a console is playing with the same specs which means you don't have to worry about your friends not being able to play a game. Consoles have many strengths that PC doesn't have.

@@lupvirga Past the NES, Zelda's "open world" was much more like a metroidvania than a western RPG style open world. It gave the player choice of navigation, but the important and linear narrative with the gating mechanics meant that it didn't offer the sandbox experience that the open world trend is known for. There's a reason that Nintendo went back to Mario 64 and NES Zelda for inspiration, and it's because they worked well with the trend. Additionally, there's still large differences between Mario 64 and Odyssey. Mario 64 is mostly linear stars stitched together into OK-sized worlds and then a hub world on top. Odyssey has large canvas worlds with the moons sprinkled throughout them, and then a level select. It's a completely different development style and game feel. Console exclusivity as in, Nintendo games aren't released on non-Nintendo consoles or PCs. That has nothing to do with whether or not they should make a console. But if you want to go down that road let's frame the question as "Should anyone buy a console in the world where companies don't artificially restrict what platforms they produce for?". Yes. The people who should are the *intersection* of three groups: people who won't already be owning a PC for non-gaming purposes, people who don't want to play games that are only possible on PC, and people who are within a specific budget range. If you are already going to be owning a PC, then upgrading it to at least console strength is going to be cheaper than buying a console. And are you really going to bring up hackers when we're talking about Nintendo games? What are the hackers going to do? Cheat themselves out of the experience of getting all the moons? Competitive FPS games are the only ones that have problems with hackers, and non-coincidentally, that's a style of game that's a much better experience on PC. Plus it's not like hackers don't exist on consoles. And if your friends couldn't afford a system that could play the games, then on consoles they couldn't play any games, while on PC they could play browser games or old games.

And we'll never have another titanfall

^this also microtransactions

Also publishers

If you knew literally anything about game development you'd never think a game's quality is tied to how lazy the people working on it are.

So Fallout 4 multiplayer devs were really working hard I guess

​@@rob3681 yes. Blaming bad games on "lazyness" instead of tight deadlines/low budget is dumb. Glitchy, unoptimized games are the result of a publisher cutting on development time, or management not wanting to spend on newer technology.

Yes, thank you!

this channel is my new pornhub

Golden age in a way

Also Doom wads those are great too

I don't give much of a shit about half life or "muh story driven games". But i too,miss the modding community a lot

Recta'al borween “muh story driven games” Do you have ADHD is that why you can’t sit down and enjoy a well-developed story?

​@@pillcosby546 Bitch,i might have. That's the problem. When I'm feeling like having a well-developed story I sit my ass down and read a book. But most games nowadays take "story" as just cutscenes and endless dialogue which just makes you think "Ok,now the game will start....ok now the game will start....ok ok,any minute now the game will start". If a player is wondering when the hell they might get to play the game again,you're not doing a game right. Dark souls is a prime example of this done right. If they want the story and lore,they have to actively seek it out. But in most games that's not the case.

Yes

A true masterpiece

Ummmmmm it’s actually bookworms adventures deluxe...

alex perez it was pretty cringe

@@gttrmgc3284 uh yeah bro its pretty cringe bro huh bro dont you know this is cringe now? bro

Bruh it was kinda cringe and funny

Nah it was fucking cringe.

Yessssss 😂😂😂😂

apex near pubg feels so appealing from the graphics, look at pubg, it looks like a piece of metal with too much lighting on it...

@@st1lysh35 no, it looks like rusty metal, too rough and incomplete graphics, need some ironing out

@@falcongamer58 u kidding me? I swear you play with very low streaming budget lmao, *laughs in unlimited graphics user*

@@st1lysh35 *gives you a no u in peak performance mode*

Same

everyone a sniper til the triple take became a care package weapon :'(

Two Tail *of a

Aa***

Indeed. I don't think single player games will die, there will still be a demand. It will just be a case of most of the established publishers and developers not being able to connect with said demand, dying or turning to BR games (most likely a mix of those) and a few years of drought while we wait for new companies to take up the torch.

Survival of the most exploitative. The old marketing methods are actually getting recognized and pushed away from and this f2p type market is replacing the old. The neverending cycle of sadness, BUT, when these switches happen, I do believe it usually has a net gain for consumers as the publishers scramble to figure out why nobody loves them. Luckily, not all games can go to this new method. We see this happen with fallout 76; it flopped.

Agreed.

Ehhhhhhh yes and no. I would say that by and large the fault lies more with publishers than devs. It's things like EA and Activision killing studios by pushing deadlines, forcing devs to cut content to open up monetization options, killing creative liberty with bullshit "market research" groups...that kinda shit. Most devs want to make good games and while I totally understand that a game dev and good businessman aren't always the same thing it's the corporatization of the industry that's really killing it. It's why some of the best games to come out in the last year have been from smaller studios not associated with these massive publishers. As for the whole f2p thing....I think it's just a fad. It will die as gamers grow up. I really believe a large portion of the f2p market thrives off kids and teenagers that have no real income and instead rely on their parents for purchases. It's not that they don't want to play $60 games its that convincing a parent to give them $60 vs $5 every week or so is harder. At least here in America. Mobile gaming is absolutely massive overseas so it's not surprising the f2p market thrives there (and why EA is in talks with TenCent to bring Apex to China...don't be surprised if Apex gets a mobile offshoot)

Colin Myers as a broke college student you’re sooooo off with f2p being for kids. I love games but if I can get 100 plus hours out of a free game then I’m gonna play the free game. As someone who plays on pc I can’t remember the last time I’ve even bothered with a 60 dollar title. It’s either free to play or a cheaper indie game or a discounted AAA. Not every person with a job wants to spend all that money on a game they might not even enjoy.

That Part Got Me So Good

Yea that was a great burn lol

It's like I was always trying to find a way to put in words what ninja is to the gaming community but never could. And then Batman said it.

Had me coughing on the bud

That part had me dead

Dude is wasted making video game KZfaq videos lol 😆

if you're gonna have to "incrementally pay for the game as you play", as in the game being locked behind a paywall you don't know is there, then that's actually fucking worse than buying the game up front, because you literally don't even know the price. i fucking hate features of a game being locked behind a goddamn paywall, when i thought i'd be able to play the full game without being forced to pay money, IT. IS. WORSE. to have features of a game inaccessible without money, than it is to have a flat price for the game. leave the fucking industry to price shit the way they want to, because you clearly have no better ideas.

@@Ardorstorm im pretty sure hes saying that option 2 is how it is now. Like pay the 60 and get all the skins and shit, or get the free game but spend 2 bucks on skins every once in a while. you dont have to pay for skins, you can still get the full game completely free, just without cosmetics

daniel riccobono He's never stopped putting out great content, the silent majority that isnt part of the "offended by everything" minority love his videos

Andrew Joseph ehhh idk his destiny videos were getting old. He just bitched to bitch imo. Otherwise I love his content

Just came from that, too. Totally agree.

@kakerake6018 Well, how about his three hour long video "Why Everyone Is Quitting Their Job To Play Call of Duty"

Work out.

@@RevPerdueJosh HA got eeeeeeeeeeeem

@@RevPerdueJosh ik what u mean its a joke but its just sad not funny.

I wish I had a wife who played video games....

@@MrAVENGER901 I wish I had a wife.

>loling keked

@@onyxowl70 i wish i had a life

I wish I had hands. (I typed this with my toes)

Same.

Or worse lol. Like when SOE killed starwars galaxies. Or when team fortress 2 tried to be overwatch

@@TheCyberSatyr Yeah, because making a battle royale counts as trying to be another battle royale. Just because they are in the same genre doesn't mean one is trying to be the other. If anything though, Fortnite is trying to be Apex. Soon after Apex blowing up, Fortnite added its ping system.

The Cyber Satyr I hope you’re being facetious

I think what happened was, Respawn had no idea their game was going to blow up as big as it did. So right now, we haven’t gotten as much updates as much, but I think they had a season 1 already planned out, but because of the growth of the game, they probably realized just adding skins and characters might’ve been too simple to add in, so that’s why they’re taking their time with updates because they understand Quality over Quantity unlike other companies which is why I think Respawn gets way more respect compared to other companies/corporations. Apex is a great game too in general so, as long as I’m satisfied, let them take their time on fully functional updates. And also most of the Devs made COD2, COD4, MW2, and other amazing CODs, basically blowing up COD to be amazing back then, but after they left, I think it’s funny how it started to decline lol, but anyways, players/gamers/the community has high hopes for Respawn so I’m excited to see the future of where the game can go.

But. It was better than the next gen Call of duty. That came out just a month before it?

It doesn't have to be a masterpiece to change the gaming landscape.

​@@1deviousmama333That is true, a single mechanic or a single aspect of gameplay wich resonates with the industry and players can change the whole way we make games. Apex legends is basicly.. "What if we made Fortnite... Exept better?" Atleast to me, fortnite was stupidly boring and didnt give me any push to play again and again, but apex is the kind of game that puts a collar on me and drags me into the game as i follow like a obidient dog.

Video games cost a shit ton to make these days man. Idk about that

@@aaronmoise8261 yet, they charged the same price for games that were easy to push out back then. They also, were able to eat off of one game for longer compared to today. They realized what they did and are paying for it because not everyone can afford their product. The free to play are making way more from micro-transactions because, people are spending more on that than the game itself. They have people spending at least $20 a week for a cosmetic. That's a high constant flow of revenue for something that doesn't take much money or time to push out. Imagine how much money Xbox would make if they only charged for live. Or, PlayStation at that. I mean, they have the better console out right now. That would mean more people on their product with a constant flow of revenue. And, that would help other games get or, keep going if the worked out a deal.

Steven Santos agreed. Only fully fleshed out and complete single player games should be $60. Any sort of online service game should be free. No one wants to pay $60 for a multiplayer game anymore esp with the free to play juggernauts taking over

@@thebkkid7182 paying 60 for a solid multiplayer experience is all right in book. But I never buy games at full price anyways I wait for reviews and deals. If a game is great has solid multiplayer and will have continued support for years to come and free dlc I don't mind paying 60?

@@aaronmoise8261 actualy I heard they cost around the same to make. Just advertising and shit.

you killed it for me now :(

@@SFnader killed what? if i spoiled something somehow thats the risk of going into comments before the vid.

source?

@@Faery69 a joke

heart_of_a_daedra same after Destiny 1 turned out to be a money pit I really haven’t been interested in to many games. I’m pretty much just playing games to pass the time at this point

@@dontstupid16 Are you me?

Same maybe because I’m getting older :( I’m 19 and college well shit I don’t have much free time now. I tried playing again but I just can’t I get bored after 30 minutes

#RebootDestiny1

Why is this thread so relatable, legit gone back to halo 3, reach and Skyrim lol

perfect image!

It will not happen. The market is becoming extremely saturated and like the mobile market but console and pc gamers are actually a little more selective so not everyone plays any type of garbage developers come up with. We got COD during the ps3/360 era , we got battle royals during this gen and people are already pushing back and rejecting those live service models in AAA titles. In the future we will have fewer but more polished AAA releases , more AA releases and F2L games with MTX models. Greed always bite developers and publishers in the end no matter what sp focusing on cheap f2p is gonna reach a limit @Agent 005​

Yeah, I agree.

David Steege Might aswell be a documentary tbh. These devs made the OG CODs. I’d watch

Dobbins is unironically a perfect example of pre-gaming journalism with his antithetical being Sterling

MankeyFTW I subbed within 1 minute lmfao

The internet has boomed simultaneously with income inequality, so it's more than likely that there's both to blame here.

Yeah, I don't see how amazon appeals only to the wealthy. I feel like it's main consumer would be middle class.

I think I half agree with what you said about businesses. Department stores are losing business because they haven't adapted to internet retail but there are other ways to gain business (even if they haven't been thought of yet). Expanding service quality and content for instance, or gaining product exclusivity to attract people. Internet retail either ends up being cheaper or more convenient for the buyer. Department stores can't universally compete in those regards but with a widening income gap there is a smaller group to target that would want to take advantage of a more expensive model that provided a better value. Like if a department store had a service in their hygiene/health department that could make custom shampoos with specific ingredients and smells for your needs, that would be an incredible service to pay for (at obvs a higher price) but the income gap means more people desire a delivery of head and shoulders off of Amazon to their doorstep. Long story short, the average department store will continue to lose business to internet retail because too many rich seek exclusivity and extreme value that they don't provide and too many lower class who desire cheap and convenient paths. Even if department stores want to innovate, the current climate doesn't support the innovation of their model but instead supports them changing their model to mimic the Amazons out there. Though I guess there are always exceptions when you talk in general, but at the same time a lot of store chains are closing locations every year because in many places there just isn't enough middle class buyers nor incentive for them

You're spot on about the back half of your post. I'm a contractor by profession, and I've always gotten paid and paid my guys based on a bid price negotiated and set at the beginning of the job to be released upon satisfactory completion of that job. I vastly prefer this over hourly work for a whole big shitload of different reasons, all based on experiences I've encountered both being a regular day laborer and construction worker at the very bottom of the rung sweeping floors on a jobsite in my teens to the supervisory and skilled labor roles I have today. But all those reasons basically boil down to this - if you pay people an hourly rate for a job, a lot of people will stretch that job out as long as they possibly can to milk it for the very last cent they could earn without getting fired or reprimanded. If you tell someone "here's the things I want done and how I want 'em done and you're not getting paid until the shit gets done to the letter of the agreed upon terms", then they're going to do the fastest job they can as best they possibly can because they know they have to deliver a *finished* product. I might just be a glorified saw jockey that finally earned a collar for his shirt, but even my dumb ass knows that finish work on a job is what really determines whether it was worth a fuck or not to have been done by whomst'd've done it for the money they did it for. I don't care if you're cutting trim with the finest miter blades hand-hewn by elvish blacksmithes and delivered straight into this plane of existence by the hand of Legolas himself, if you don't paint and caulk the shit then at the end of the day all you did was nail some fancy wood to the bottom of the wall. My long-ass unrelated rant is basically me saying this - when you play early access or unfinished games, you're just throwing money and time away on an inferior experience. It's literally a game company saying "we're too shitty to do all the work the right way and deliver you a complete product, and you're too dumb to tell the difference".

ok but the point is that he said if the game were to "adapt ", as you put it, there would be a gap in the game industry. just like how stores moved to having a online presents the gaming industry is moving to a battle royal and free to play presents. in both of these cases those who do not adapt loose because the void that they are leaving in their respective communities. amazon becomes cheaper and beats the competition. games that are free to play and have in-game currency direct the traif of the consumer's money into in-game purchases instead of other games. that is why there are fewer story games or game with different game mods. just like how many store opened oniline presents games have opened a battle royal presents ... (ex-cod csgo pubg fortnight apex... ) fortnight and apex are the same as Amazon and eBay in the sense they are changing the market and taking away other company models where it is storyline or brick and mortar.

how would it negatively affect publisher mindset?? EA had NOTHING to do with this game. if anything it might tell them to back the FUCK off

@@matt1523 exactly

EA gives more freedom to the studios that make more money.

@@4m4n40 -so EA gave more freedom to Respawn that didn't make enough money for EA with both Titanfall games?? How does that work?

matt1523 Publishers tend to see things in every way except how they really are. This game does well? It’s not because Respawn had total creative control, it’s because it’s a Battle Royale with loot boxes. Who doesn’t love those right? EA openly stated that Battlefield V underperformed because there was no Battle Royale at launch. Not the part where they said “hey don’t buy the game if you don’t like it” but the part where it didn’t have Battle Royale. You have to remember publishers are... “special minded”.

Was original beta player on paragon .. miss it !!

@@Fricer77 the community projects looking good tho so im pretty excited for that

It's sad too cause Apex at least to me is very fun but it's success makes other games get cancelled or fail due to disinterest

Ya but you know that won't happen lol

Yea you know ea would rather pocket that money

Apex was supposed to be Titanfall 3

Have fun! The last and best battlefield game was bf4 and boy was it fun!

Bro BF4 is fun af I play it still lol

Matthew Nava back in the day it used to be everything

Joshua Gomez unless you play stw then the bugs take months to iron out

​@@lego_minifig I don't play stw so I wouldn't know, but most of their player base isn't on stw, although they should focus on it as much as they do the br

you also have to pay for reach campaign as dlc

@@graaphics2119 I honestly care more about the old custom games I used to play full of like 20 people. The campaign was pretty cool though.

Same bro but im gonna have to say Halo REACH custom games. Halo 3 custom games? Nah bruh Reach's Forge World in Forge created so many maps that it was unreal. Also all the tools in reach were vastly superior

@@omster_ kinda. There were certain game modes that didn't really translate well to reach, something about damage calculation working differently. For example, you can't kill someone by running them over in warthog wars in reach, despite being able to in halo 3 with the same rules. iirc fat kid worked a lot better in halo 3 as well.

@@ihave2cows Bruhh fat kid. Man youre giving me 2x nostalgia. What was the website to gwt all of these? I uswd to watch achievement hunters and they had the maps on some halo wrbsite that transferred the map to ur game.

You have the option of playing games you already own, or old games that are freeware. It's not just F2P.

Also consider indie games, and older games that are now much cheaper.

Also consider getting a job

Man I hope story games don't get affected. All my life I have played story games considering I play by myself mainly and they are just so much better than movies. Some of them are so well written, they are better than some of the major books out there. The fact is, with story games, is that you genuinly get attatched to the main character. For e.g. take the tragedy in Red Dead One, holy shit man that hit me hard and came across as the biggest shock of my life. Or the ending in Telltales TWD. Naughty Dogs, Uncharted 2: among thieves and the last of us and just so much fucking more. oh man, I hope the story industry isn't affected, I will happily dish out £60 when i'm old enough to get a job holy shit.

XDarkEcho Money. It’s all about money. To create a large and inspiring game, it requires a large sum of time and resources which only publishers can provide. These publishers are only interested in making money and helping their investors so the risk of creating something new is not a viable strategy. It’s easier to say, “Game A worked pretty well so let’s make Game A part 2 with loot boxes and other micro transactions.” There are studios that do want to branch out and try new things but to maintain the quality that AAA games have set over the past decade, it’s nearly impossible.

@@peterr8586 I hear you on that, and that indeed is a problem with the gaming industry, unfortunately. I miss how we used to have so many genres on the market back then, where saturation of one sole genre was rare(i mean, I guess shooters have always been the biggest genre in the West, but still had a LOT of different games to choose from). I mean, you'd have RTS, Shooters, Platformers, RPGs, JRPGs, etc flooding the gaming market; everyone wanted to be the next big hit on their respective genre and competition was plentiful! Not now, studios have shut down, been bought out by bigger publishers/developers, and the creative minds that once shaped the industry have left to do their own thing, or retired. It really saddens me, because this has happened in such a short amount of time too; roughly 10-15 years. As you said, corporate greed and appeasing investors, has warped the way games are made as a model now, more so now than ever before.

Agreed. You don’t see creativity for example what all the Bungie devs did for Halo. The emotional story telling, music, well thought out design.

I could see how you'd think that if you're a normie. But here's the kicker, EA, Activision, Ubisoft and Blizzard arent the only companies making games. Shocking i know. If you want good games, just go watch compilations of upcoming games. Usually anything made by other companies don't have microtransactions or loot boxes. Look at biomutant or the last night or even granblue fantasy. So many fantastic games but normies are always crying because they only know about games that are shoved in their faces. Maybe instead of being told whats coming out you go and look for yourself :D

XDarkEcho Sekiro is right around the corner

Literally the reason I subbed to his channel, hahahaha 😂

I was hoping someone caught what he said. I thought my ears were playing tricks on me 🤣🤣🤣🤣

The LiiTe And who is "she"?