Ich finde die 1.Version ist bestimmt die Bessere, da es in den Augen des Betrachters, dem Fotografen liegt, das Beste aus der Landschaft herauszuholen. Nach und nach kann man dann aufstocken, man hat dann auch das Gefühl dafür. Danke für diesen großartigen Beitrag!!!!! 👍👏

Ich sehe es auch so, dass ohne das „Auge des Fotografen“ die teuerste Kamera nichts taugt. 😉 Schönes Wochenende dir und liebe Grüße 👋🏼🤗

It’s such an interesting time we live in now as there is no such thing as a bad camera and the poor photographer can pick up a pro level camera second or third hand for a fraction of the cost it originally was and these camera compete with the latest very well! However I must add that without knowledge, skill and practice even a rich photographer with all the gear won’t get a shot as good as someone who has taken the time to learn and develop their eye and skills !!

Great job on the video Christian. I think you and I both agree that it’s not the camera but the photographer who takes the great photo. Sometimes the latest and greatest doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the best. I think it doesn’t matter whether you’re rich or poor - it’s the person who goes the extra mile to get the shot or practices the most, that in the long run ends up the better photographer

I use a canon 760d for wildlife and sigma lens and I make it work. And a nifty 50 for landscape as it came with the camera and have got so much fun with it your are so right

Yes, it is very much true that having the least options will make you better in creativity rather than having too many options.

I use an old Canon 550d with an ef 24.105 ulm, and I don't have the means to change it, it's true that I don't have the opportunity to dream of better so I concentrate on the essentials. I force myself to go out once a week, I look for the right lights and I enjoy making do with what I have. In addition, the camera's battery is low, so that forces me not to take photos, anything and everything, and my memory card is very small.

I totally agree with you. I'm not rich but also not poor. But I did find out that there was more to improve to myself then to my gear. I realy embraced my local area and started to understand the weather system. And like you said I am realy into light these days. The only thing I look for is light and atmospheric conditions like fog. People on my channel even started calling me the fog men 😅 my advice would be that it's better to invest in moments instead of gear. Great video! Grt guido

I have one camera, a nikon coolpix p900, it doesn't even shoot raw... for me i do photography just as a hobby, but i learned all the ways to make the photos i want to take. for example, since it doesn't do raw, I usually go with brackets and then merge in hdr, and have to always try to get it right in camera. there's a quote about creativity coming from limitations... so yeah

Viel Zeit im Feld ist der Schlüssel zum Erfolg. Oft am gleichen Ort zu fotografieren ist für mich wichtig. Bei der Tierfotografie ist ein 600 mm f4 aber schon wichtig…. Langes lichtstarkes Glas kostet viel Geld!

Beautiful landscape nature

If your point is that art thrives on restrictions, I agree.

Seems to be varying degrees of financial waste Landscape photographers are looking for as many Mpix as possible and upgrade to MF Bird photographers search for the best digital camera with autofocus and the best long telephoto lens, which they update as better equipment comes along, they may also jump between different manufacturers often Art photographers go for luxury brands and many Mpix in the sensors Street photographers seem to think like art photographers Animal photographers I guess are like bird photographers. Many photographers I deal with jump around between different software manufacturers to get that extra. Personally, I have problems when I have to make major updates to a camera system after the camera that I'm using has stopped working and then it's mostly updating the lens that gets out of hand.. I prefer to use the same camera so I learn it properly with a only one lens for a long time.

The "poor" photographers are better because they upgrade their vision first and upgrade their vision again before they buy gear and they are the rule breakers too because they take images instinctively. If photography chooses the person, not the other way around, those photographers will take much better images every time, it doesn't matter if they are poor or rich.

It would all depend on the individuals motivation and level if determination for either one ...😉

Expensive gear is very relative. How much expensive the moto is or other thing which people buy. And no body asks the question... Maybe sometime we are in the syndrome of: "the shoemaker has the worst shoes". And I say: yes, buy the good and expensive gear. Do not be like this shoemaker 😉