Yes, yes there is.

Buddy, come on. Let’s not lie here

@@YodaOnABender He's the one spreading bullshit.

​@@arbiter8246 Finish the video coward.

Interestingly of all these, the American Pitbull Terrier seems like the breed that is least mangled by inbreeding. I'm pretty sure all of the others with their weird broad stance have very high prevalence of hip and shoulder problems. All the fairly flat faced ones have breathing issues. And Bull Terrier not only looks like a cruel joke but it has lots and lots of health issues; but despite it's origin from blood sport and it's "fighting dog"-like musculature it's really just a very stupid but playful and cuddly dog.

I'm actually less worried about dogs bred for a specific job, by breeders who know what they're doing; than dogs that are bred primarily or exclusively for their particular look by any random breeder who is in it for money. If you're breeding dogs for a job (and not looks or any "standard" of how a "breed" is "supposed" to look), you would not want to severely inbreed it you would mix in dogs from lots of different "breeds" based on their abilities which even if the desired goal is a dog that can literally attack people on command, it probably will also be bred and trained to be obedient and safe towards the handler. But if the _only_ goal is to make a dog that looks a certain way because that "breed" is fashionable at the moment, an unscrupulous breeder might not care about at all about the health or safety of either the dog or their owners. And while health issues for the dog itself is much more common when inbreeding animals, it's also very likely that inbreeding could result in bad behaviour too. And infamously, very small dogs are often very nervous, loud and aggressive because their small size means even a child can still restrain them with a leash because they are so small, so behavioural problems are more easily ignored. While big dogs _have_ to be well behaved otherwise they can't be handled and will be euthanised; so even careless breeders will be forced by necessity (if for nothing else but their own safety) to at least consider behaviour as well as looks (but they still can end up breeding large dogs with serious heath issues, though). I really think we should abandon the whole idea of "breeds", it's just an euphemism for inbred.

The Drinker literally works with the Daily Wire. So please, shut up with the „they are not conservative” claim. And no, the fact that the sequal trilogy was a comercial success, and that woke movies like Barbie or the Spiderverse movies succeed debunks your point.

It’s so weird how drinker’s audience are so afraid to admit to what they are… almost like they themselves know they suck deep down

The general public has no clue he exists.

​@@YodaOnABenderWe are anti far left

And yet his simps call CD and other content creators grifters, when all they do is talk about media. The projection is hilarious

youre defending someone who couldnt care less about you

We get it, you can't make arguments so you just whine and cope.

​@@dalekrenegade2596 More coping. More seething

Please, nothing in the ideology of the Drinker is based on reality, and you know it.

It’s typical leftie babble. One hour of childish bias with zero points made

Coping, coping, more coping and no small amount of jealousy from Drinker cultists.

​@@dalekrenegade2596The projection is crazy. Cope and seethe more loser.

@@iSpeciaIist What projection?

@@laurentiuvladutmanea3622 I wasn't even talking to you. You must have forget to switch accounts.

Oh no people make actual arguments and drinker fans just gave up and went straight to coping insults.

​@@dalekrenegade2596Cope and seethe more, tend to that butthurt

Tell that to the legions of your coping cohorts.

@@dalekrenegade2596 Please give me examples of Drinkers controversial takes. Also your comeback was so "lefties cannot meme" that it hurts. You might also want to check what the word "cope" means.

@@Nekoksu He misrepresented Disney by claiming they were attacking all fans when they condemned the online abuse of Moses Ingram by a minority of fans. It was very dishonest of him. He also misrepresented detractors of his Midsommar review when he claimed they were defending the film by clinging onto “themes” (despite the film clearly having themes of loss and bereavement because it’s a psychological horror). His lukewarm defence of Lady Ballers was pathetic considering that the film is the very thing he dislikes which is a political agenda film. Those are three examples, I’m sure there’s more. But yeah, he’s a shallow critic as the video shows.

@@Nekoksu Play the video coward and actually try to make an argument unlike your fellows who just gave up and resort to lazy no you responses.

@@dalekrenegade2596 Can you use punctuations? I am not a native english speaker, but god damn i can speak/type better english than you. What is this "video coward"? Lefties cannot meme at all.