Correct my friend because of jealousy the haters will always hate because they're jealous.

Nissan was in Le Mans too, with their r91cp

@@andyka591 with their r32 aswell

@@Fyrosaurus R32 is not on Le Mans, R33 did

@@andyka591 Oh yeah youre right. Sorry for false claims hah. I was thinking about the gt500 one😬

Well said by all, JDM' s time for sure.👍

Si hacemos memoria esos colores le han dado tantas victorias a nissan, con el zx cunningham de Steve millen, con el r90 y 92 cp, co los 180 sx en imsa, es algo a tener en cuenta, tal vez si los r390 gtr de 1998 hubieras salido con esos colores hubieran tenido un poco más de fortuna, pero un tercer lugar no está tan mal, es la kabala de nissan.

Old comment, but I agree. That's iconic, I still picture the R32 in that livery.

It came from Datsun 510

Agreed, imagine if Ford focused on the 4.0l Inline Six to combat the RB engine.

We have the Barra it will match any inline 6

Well said!!

@@blumie006 The Barra came out 20(?) years after this. This is the era of the EA/EB Falcon with the issue filled 3.9 and then the 4.0. The 3.9 had no more power or torque then the Valiant's Slant Six in the '60's. From the 4.0, through the F6 motors, and then the Barra, Ford Australia developed something special, but the US management tried and eventually got rid of Ford Aus production.

Would've been cool to have the Mitsubishi GTO/3000gt in there too lol,over shadowed by the Evo

Wonder when it'll qualify for TCM ? :)

The whole reason why I love the 32 GTR

@@PiDsPagePrototypes A long while! Hopefully they will let the Nissan Bluebird turbo into TCM soon, it's more or less meeting the age criteria now that VB Commdores and XD Falcons are racing. But TCM seems to be rather V8 centric -- hopefully the TCM rule makers aren't anti-turbo...

@@TassieLorenzo - hope so too. The Bluebirds were an under rated weapon, same goes with Longhurst in the M3

Joseph Elias we had to, they were way too op. But it was Japan that was hurt the most, in their all Japan gt championship the r32's went undefeated in 4 seasons. Winning 29 races from 29 starts. Even in these videos you could see the r32's had unmatched reliability, acceleration, braking and cornering and were unbeatable in the wet.

group a was also coming to an end with europe going down a 2 litre path and we never hear about how the europeans changed the rules. Ford was racing the sierra rs500 at the time and not a v8 falcon. So we had the option of going down the 2 litre path like europe or the v8 formula which has been extremely successful in attracting crowds to events and entrants.

@@carisi2k11 Not exactly ! Mostly the rules changed to ban Japaneses brands from victories! And simply sometimes there was no rules changed and just a ban ! The R32 was banned from Australian racing because of It's amazing AWD SYSTEM the famous ATTESA ET-S ! A good excuses to put out Nissan which was grabing almost all the victories in the seasons ! Mazda banned Rotary engine from LeMans 24h again because other brands complaints ! In WRC in the era of 2L 4WD, they changed rules and displacements to cut off the 10 years victories of Toyota Subaru and Mitsubishi !

You AMERICANIZED people dont know how to lose.. v8s? V8 my ass

Which lead to the downturn of the Australian built car market. Instead of rising to the challenge.

Better than anything you see today

So amazing, never seen footage this age this good

Well they did win with the 31, 6 of the 8 races that year were in the 31.

Thats why it was banned.

I know , pretty cool to see 👍👌

They were cheating with turbo computer chips to give 1000 horsepowers

@@ArtVandelayOfficial How can it cheat is only 2,6litre engine turbocharged engine but V8 bigger engine over 5 litres engine.

@@ArtVandelayOfficial most it ran was 600hp. stop pulling bullshit out of your arse.

and the truth is that the Holdens were a lot further away from the road car than the GTR was, with Chevy engines moved way back in the engine bay.

If i were you, id get into watching the Supercars. Forget that they are token holden and fords, now other makes as well. They share nothing with the road cars, they are bespoke race cars and the racing is epic. The development of the cars is very advanced. If you ever spoke to some of the people involved in the engineering and manufacture of the cars, it just gives you more appreciation. They are far more wild than F1, way more cut and thrust and the race atmosphere is fantastic.

TRUE

the insane ramblings of a self proclaimed 3-digit IQ … yea cos all other race series in the world run factory road cars... you're basically stating you have no real interest in motorsport or put any thought about the financial viability of our tiny manufacturers doing fuckton of R&D to produce niche AWD sports cars let alone anything else 'revolutionary', how stupid! This 'trend of technology' hasn't really improved since the 2000's so I don't even know what you're talking about - and EVERYONE drives in shitbox SUVs anyway which drive like shit in every way, cost a fortune and have terrible fuel consumption (look at new car sales figures, it's fucked). by the way actual motorsport fans would have V8 'stupidcars' as one of the most respected series right next to WRC and F1 in the world as one of the last series in the world to have good 'driver racing' with hauling heavy ass cars with no driver aids, little power steering, clutch on downshifts (these shit on Eurocentric GT series like Blancpain imo).

Your loss.

GTRs had 2.6 engines from factory. Wouldn’t imagine they’d change displacement for these races.

2.4L was the initial displacement during the development of the R32 GT-R when the car was going to be RWD. This was changed to 2.6L after ATTESA-ETS was introduced to the car to combat the weight increase.

Was up to the manufacturers to create the winning car, not complain about other cars being too fast -_-". This car did amazing things but also ruined Australian Motorsport. Aussie Companies & Fans didn't like Japanese Cars winning Aussie Races. Even though the Sierra's dominated the V8's for multiple years prior. But it was an amazing vehicle and I will always love it. Cannot say that for every car that raced that it was banned entirely for being too fast and the competitors too slow.

@@Artecius92 That's because Australia is a racist country, even now. What utter boneheads booing one of the greatest cars over the line. Wouldn't happen anywhere else.

@@rudicon4u that's right mate. We're secretly racist, just gutless to admit it.

@@Artecius92 Because they are a bunch of sore loser excuses all the time just a straight banned.

@@Artecius92 V8s my ass outdated technology Japan is the most advanced technologies when it comes to cars and electronic.

They banned it because it was built to go fast from the ground up....2.6ltr...twin turbo.. Computer controlled 4wd...and 4ws...it was a super car destroyer.....and unfortunately it was unleashed into a world of " ordinary " cars...the sierra rs500 came with a2ltr twincam turbo 2wd...224bhp and a bit of downforce from the factory..and was born in the mid 80s....developed from a mundane saloon car....I know I've a stock 2dr sierra not even a cosworth. ...they're nothing compared to the skyline...a full generation of development went into it...that's just how it is...in road and race cars...

Godzilla.

Nismo 4x4 power mate, can't beat it

Because they are a bunch of sore losers.

It's difference between war gear and fun toys

It was Wheels magazine that originally coined the term "Godzilla" for the R32 in one of their articles. The name, fittingly, stuck. In their day, they were a beast on & off the track.

Steve Lee that’s not actually true. The R32 had a lot of fans. The Sierras were the real beginning of the end. The R32 just made it a certainty. Knife in a fist fight.

True to a point, hence why Jimmy Richards gave the two fingers salute to all the haters.

@@EVOETR1 Because they are V8 fan's and jealous can't handle the losing .

they are a lovely drive, wish I hadn't sold mine now; mind you, you have to watch them going out of roundabouts on wet days when the turbo spools up and flicks the tail out! thats when I would have liked the 4wd!

@@racketman2u Yup even my 2.5 de can get tail happy on a wet day and it still has its original clutch

@@brettmciver432 Yes the Nissan GTR is a beast on the tracks.

Yep love it, Jim now owns that car.

probably not at all because why would you go through all the R&D costs to develop a niche AWD turbo sports car and compete with a car that is already good at it's job?

If Ford continued with Dick Johnsons XE Ford Falcon experiment with the Ford 250 crossflow motor that was being developed, perhaps it could've been spectacular. It was an inline 6 turbo being trialed, however it did not proceed as Ford did not believe adding a turbo was the way forward, but V8 was far superior. I wonder if Dick ever asked them "how does that humble pie taste.......?" when the turbo vehicles arrived and the GODzilla kicked arse

Because they are a bunch of sore losers.

haha Nissan almost went bankrupt, and was rescued by a merger with Renault.

@@kit266022 no, this was years ago, Ghosn was appointed at the time of the Nissan Renault merger.

Unfortunately not for much longer

The GTR won cuz of the AWD systems and the turbo,making the car will hit the top speed faster.Also the skyline is AWD so they are every grippy and quick in the corners.The skyline’s top speed is just 180kmh but these assholes banned it by “eW cHeAtER111!!1!!”

@@initialdoge8528 because they a bunch of sore loser.

@@kit266022 True

Yeah hahaha, how blatant can you be....

When you buy a karaoke cd but they dont have copyright to the original songs.

Originally the GT-R was going to be a twin turbo 2.4L and compete in the 4L class, but they decided it would not be competitive, so increased the displacement to 2.6l and competed in the 4.5L class.

Probably got their stats from when it was still in the design phase.

Yet it cleary says RB26 on the rocker cover 🤣

Steve Johnson, Australia kept Group A Racing going until the end of 1992, 2 years after Germany gave Grp A the flick, this is an established fact. It was the FIA that abolished turbos in Group A Racing, Australia/CAMS didn't act unilaterally on that. It wasn't really the GTR that saw the demise of Group A, it was just the straw that broke the camel's back. The real problem was the dominance of the Ford Sierra RS500 in Europe......chiefly Germany and Britian. 3/4's of the field in the BTCC and the German TCC were Sierras. Did the GTR lay Australian tracks to waste in Group A? Yeah they did. But so did Johnson and Bowe before them in Sierras. As did Andy Rouse did in Britain in a Sierra......and the Texaco Sierras did in Germany

Both Germany and Britain gave group A the flick at the end of 1990, that's just the way it happened. Australian Motor Racing Fan's unwillingness to adopt Group A racing, had nothing to do with that. The close racing the FIA told motor racing fans that Group A would provide, never materialised. The dominance of the Ford Sierra in Britian and Germany effectively killed Group A Racing. In 1989 in the BTCC, literally every car on the grid was a Sierra. It's also true that CAMS in Australia persisted with Group A 2 years after Britain and Germany killed it off. Australian bogan motor racing fans had nothing to do with CAMS giving Group A the flick, that's ignorant, errant nonsense. CAMS simply followed suit by killing it off.....just like Britain and Germany did two years earlier

A complete rip off of "Jump" by Van Halen... just listen to the original haha....

Get yo ass back in the kitchen!

You mean the car in the race? Or original color when they came out?

Ar_Ai_Ayy Ar_Ai_Zek race car

They win too much already they don't care anymore.

@@kit266022 lol what have nissan won lately. the only time nissan did well internationally was grp A.

@@nuztuz903 whatever keep hating mate just jealous.

it only became "unfair" when Nissan proved that maybe cast-iron pushrod V8s weren't the ultimate!

Straight 6 twin cam....not v6....

when the gtr was designed the turbo multiplication factor was 1.7... meaning it equated the 2.6 to 4.4 Lt.. really they should have also limited boost to around 10 psi.. instead they were running anywhere from 17 to 27 bar ... this approximates to 5.7 to 7.5 Lt equivelancy factor.. for more competative racing the boost on the nissan needed to be way reduced.. and then varied to get fairer racing