(People that would never buy a traverse anyway) “ugh 4 cylinder?! Pass!”

That wil make a great used car, 2 years from now for 30k

I could've used one of your lengthened reviews, especially driving; but Thanks for giving us what they'd allow. Can't wait for more to arrive on lots for a comparison review.

Soft touch materials on the rear door panels awesome I wish other companies would do the same,nice suv good tech lots of space,not perfect but not bad at all cool review 💯

I maybe see the 4cyl in the base model, but the Z71? The V6 should at the very least be an option. From my experience, 4cyl in that large of a vehicle = long term problems.

Saw the thumbnail, thought it was a Tahoe.

I don't understand these small/heavy SUVs with small turbo engines (under more stress than a v6) Why not the straight 6 turbo? I guess it's good marketing for the car companies to ensure you get a new care every 5-7 years.

This light control gripe is blown way out of proportion. I always left my lights on auto before anyway. You still control the brights on the stock and the on/off is always on the screen.

You lost me at 4 cylinder… good review Ben

Great review! I’m a fan of the RS and would love to see it compared side by side to some of its competitors.

Definitely an upgrade, just wish it wasnt slower than the old 3.6 v6. I guess extra power/torque and a turbo can only fight physics so much…

For me, Ben, that drip part of the taillights reminds me of the old gen Camry 😅

I like this baby Tahoe of a Traverse.:)

Can 3 car seats fit across the 2nd row?

Fantastic design 🩶

Good looking suv for a Chevy

If GM had a good hybrid system and in this I would be on it.. or even Diesel.

Imagine if they put the start button in the screen 😂

Wow I thought that was a Tahoe at first

Grand Highlander has a 2.4 turbo 4.

That thing is huge! It’s 204” 😂😂😂😂

Not sure I would buy anything less than a Tahoe/Yukon. I’m iffy.

Man you gotta get over the whole infotainment thing. I rarely have to touch my screen and NEVER have had to touch the light controls. I know it's new and an odd idea but functionally there's very little impact. Like if the infotainment screen went out your vehicle is still driveable. Unless for some odd reason you had your lights not on auto but I feel like there probably a workaround.

Perfect, another unaffordable SUV.

This would be a sweet car…if GM had simply kept the V6.

six banger and lose the red interior. Why have a color in the interior. Jeep even got rid of that in the Rubicon. Geez

4 cylinder and only 24 mpg hwy? My 2020 Silverado RST 4x4 crew cab gets 23. What a joke.

Our Jeep Grand Cherokee L is bigger than

60 k for a 4 cylinder 💰💰💰💩🤣... I like it , but not close to 60 k like it , thanks for the content Boss !

That 4 cylinder is a deal breaker for me

Lost me at 2.5 Turbo.

Might as well buy a Silverado for that price at

Meh! Great review though!

If u look at those awful taillights from the rear 3/4 view it looks like a snake opening its mouth. GM cannot for the life of it build good looking taillights.

BEN Hardy I am very surprised that you have said that about giving Chevrolet CRAP........about the rear lights....I was told that all the designers went to the same design schools. How about Ford coppying the bed steps from GM . That 2.5 L. Is the 2.7L with a bit of the engine detuned. With SIDI turbo aka same as what BMW does to their engines, slot of people say it's about time they did this. How about the air vents that started on the Audi dash, which just about all manufacturers copped.😮

My dad had a saying, a polished turd is still a turd. every time i see a GM vehicle below a Tahoe/1/2 ton truck i think of it. Planned obsolescence at it’s finest.

$54K for a 4 cylinder? I’m out.

How can you make such a great vehicle with such a bad engine and transmission 🤦🏻‍♂️ gm common seriously wake up