They already surrendered their sovereign rights to China. Last time there were Chinese ships in the Malaysian EEZ, and they are not doing anything.

You call being humiliated by those godless pirates 'getting tough'?

No. Couldn't even defend themselves if Singapore invaded them. MY PH are little fish in the ocean. Only Indonesia has enough manpower and firepower now to face China. Indonesia may not win but they can leave a huge dent.

Naw..we work together with China to build up our country's economy first. In order to start any conflict or war, your country must have enough financial resources and food supply..not blindly depend on others.

@@cheekeongchan9750 Seeing CCG ships within your EEZ, I'm fully believed that you already surrendered your sovereign rights to the CCP.

Why doesn't MalAysia join Singapore?😂🤣

Malaysia & Philippines have a legitimate claim on Corruptland and Slutsland respectively.

@@fernandocruz4877 Because they don't thumbs up their own comment

@@huangzb8060 you are very pretty

@huangzb8060 Yes, of course, cause it's corrupt but not on North Borneo

It’s called fairness, they should have done this when the federation of Malaya was formed but they didn’t! They chose a committee to decide instead of a plebiscite by the people of Sabah. They allowed Sarawak a plebiscite because they had no sultan (that was formerly bruneis) but Sabah? Then it was squarely the land of the Sultanate of Sulu, and the people loved the Sultan, where would they vote then? Asking to vote now is unfair. Justice is needed for this!

The three heads of state signed an agreement known as the Manila Accord, which stipulated that including North Borneo as part of Malaysia would not prejudice either the claim or any right thereunder by the Philippines to the territory. It was further agreed to petition the UN to send another commission (besides the Cobbold Commission) of inquiry and the Philippines and Indonesia decided to drop their objection to the formation of Malaysia if the new commission found popular opinion in the territories in favour of within the context of General Assembly resolution 1541 (XV), Principle IX of the Annex, by a fresh approach. The UN Mission to Borneo was thus established, comprising members of the UN Secretariat from Argentina, Brazil, Ceylon, Czechoslovakia, Ghana, Pakistan, Japan, and Jordan. Members of the Mission include Mr. George Howard; Mr. Kenneth K.S. Dadzie; Mr. Laurence Michelmore; Mr. George Janecek, Deputy Representative of the UN Secretary-General, and Mr. Neville. The Mission's report, authored by UN Secretary-General U Thant found a sizeable majority of the people in favour of joining Malaysia. Indonesia and the Philippines subsequently rejected the report's findings and Indonesia continued its semi-military policy of confrontation towards Malaysia. The "referendum" did not involve the entire population of North Borneo and Sarawak at that time, but only representative consultations. The UN mission report noted "there was no reference to a referendum or plebiscite in the request..." and that "the Mission accordingly arranged for consultations with the population through the elected representatives of the people, leaders of political parties and other groups and organizations, and with all persons who were willing to express their views". The UN Secretary-General’s mission spent three weeks in Borneo to conduct a survey. It reported on Sept 15, 1963, that the Malaysia proposal had the wide backing of the people of these territories. Type this down: United Nations Malaysia Mission Report, “Final Conclusions of the Secretary-General,” 14 September 1963

Done before

Huh!? The Philippines economy is consistently top in Asia. Mark your word!

for all u know, sabahan might just want full Independence instead of under Malaysia or Philippines 😂😂

Don't matter. This is a property issue not territorial since the sultan of sulu is a private citizen and Malaysia allows foreigners to own land. All Malaysia has to do is give updated titles under the current government as it was recognized before the dutch and by the Dutch and should be no problem after the Dutch. It's just Malaysian land owned by a Filipino citizen

@@rl8571 loooool and when ur sulu sultan comes to sabah pls ask him to bring a passport to go thru Malaysian immigration hahaha

@liesterminator2 Hey, land grabbers and thieves, pay what is due from you. You're been judged by the international arbitration court. Lol!

@@liesterminator2 Hey, squatters! Get out of the land that didn't belong to you! Go to the forest, meaning the forest city, you'll be accommodated there! loool!

​@@rl8571you are correct. That is why $14.9B Petronas assets were seized in Luxembourg and Azerbaijan and awarded to the Sultans heirs. Many more court cases will follow and more assets will be seized.

No

​@@90taetaeya😂

Of courseBecause they join idiot😂😂😂😂😂😂

Then why doesn't Malaysia want it get to the court itself to be proven?

Yepp its belong to malaysia

because its their land, it not about the american bases in the country

The real Sabahans are supressed of their rights in their own land. They are not allowed to have jobs and and to vote. The one's claimimg to be sabahans in the present are malaysian Squatters. The Badjaos are the real Sabahans. They must have known that it will be going back to the rightful owner someday thats why malaysian govt. are not developing the area despite of it being rich in natural resources.

@chickensoup9869 It's PH bases not US bases. Educate yourself. US are only given access to the PH bases. MalAysia, Thailand, Singapore give also access to US on its bases.

Sabah is the Philippines'. Read history.

​@@neslieatilanoask around and you will find Sabahans identify as Malaysians, not as Filipinos

Who will attack PH?😂🤣

@@fernandocruz4877China will.

​@@FreedomOfSpeechKL For what reason.

​@@arnowisp6244because plgnoy is Iike a rats who eat pagpag😅

我们现在来了😊❤🇲🇾

But the land doesn't belong to you. It belongs to the heirs of Sultan of Sulu.

@@fernandocruz4877 lol sabah belong to Native sabahans and they choose to form Malaysia pagpag land has no right on native sabahans decisions

​@nirm3220 You're squatters! You belong to the forest. Go to the forest city, you'll be accommodated there.😂🤣

Easy choice. Just compare health care ratings, crime ratings, gas prices etc.

@@chickensoup9869 Courtesy from the fats of the land of the Sultanate of Sulu.😂🤣

the territory was a privately owned by the sultan of sulu the british has no right over it

@@UMAKEMESMILESWACKIN Nonsense. It was Brunei territory and so was Sulu. The only rightful owner was Brunei and they gave it to the British and the UN charter declared it was part of independent Malaysia. Even then, it wasn't the whole of Sabah, just a small portion. The rest was always part of the British North Borneo. Don't waste your time like how you are doing with the so-called West Philippines sea. Why do you think your government has stopped claiming Sabah? Cause they have seen the real documents now and stopped believing the Sulu's. The current claims are done by Sulu alone using an independent private lawyer and not endorsed by the EU or any other courts.

​@caseystevens8302 It's a private and commercial transaction. It's about propriety, not sovereignty. You can't take away the propriety or property of others without due process of law or just compensation.

@@fernandocruz4877 I don't think you understand what I have been saying. Fyi, im a historian of Southeast Asian affairs. The point I'm making is that Sulu does not have any right of claim. So what is your argument about?

​@caseystevens8302 The Sultanate of Brunei gave North Borneo to the Sultanate of Sulu for latter help to quell the civil war in Brunei in Brunei in the 1600's.

You’re too young to know this dispute, lad

Rational Filipino. Let us join hands to defend our sea against China's claim.

@@iqbalmuhammad2920 the Philippines claim is not even recognized by the mighty powerful US 😅

South China sea was given to China post ww2 . When pinoy land was still a US colony .. And where was the yanks when you needed them... Some of you pinoys ought to be taught a good lesson .....edited ...not given but returned... China has been very restrained ..I really want to see the us gets involved like the always she was involved in Ukraine

@@kimchiba4570 agreed. And the Chinese and Filipinos have been friends for centuries now doing trade and commerce. What did the yanks do for PH?

Why waste time arbitrate thing that already yours..... Philippines should just focus on its eez that being claim by china instead

The basis of Sulu's claim for arbitral award in several arbitral courts in France, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands is based on the Final Award (worth USD 14.92 billion) granted to Sulu by Dr Gonzalo Stampa (and not by the court). He was appointed earlier as an arbitrator in an arbitration claim between Sulu and Malaysia by the Madrid Court on 22/5/2019. His appointment is an ex parte judgment without the consent of Malaysia. Later, the same court on 29/6/2021 invalidated his appointment followed by the Spanish Constitutional Court (2/2/2023) that decided his appointment unconstitutional and invalid. Thus, Sulu lost the arbitral claim in Spain. Meantime on 25/5/2020, Dr Stampa brought his case to France and granted a Final Award to Sulu against Malaysia on 28/2/2022. However, on 6/6/2023 Sulu lost the case again as the Paris Court of Appeal could not uphold Sulu's appeal to enforce the Final Award that is no longer valid. On top of that, the court ordered the claimants to pay Malaysia 100,000 euros. On 27/6/2023, Sulu claimants also lost in the arbitration court case in The Netherlands when the Dutch Court of Appeal dismissed a bid by Sulu to enforce a Final Award against the government of Malaysia. As for Luxembourg, on 26/1/2023, the Luxembourg court set aside the Sulu arbitration award. However, Sulu re-submitted again, and Malaysia made an appeal. The arbitration court will make its decision on the Sulu appeal later. Dr Stampa (Sulu’s lawyer) has been sentenced to jail in Spain for contempt of court related to this issue. The case is pending. In the future, Sulu needs to produce an arbitral agreement or clause with Malaysia if ever to open a new case in an arbitration court in any country. The question is, does Sulu, have it?

@@hopelope1703 Malaysia does not want this in a arbitral court

@@hopelope1703 can you tell me what is the payment malaysia is giving the heirs of the sultan of sulu if they already owned sabah?? hmmm.............................................

Those White Skins mess up the border line, yet you still go back to White Skin for Arbitration. 😂 They want Asians and the rest of the world at constant war, so they can divide and rule. Period.

And then go to semenajung MalAysia.😂🤣

Why must goto semenanjung? Sabahan people will forever stay still in sabah. ​@@fernandocruz4877

​@@fernandocruz4877 Sabahan would rather go to war than gaveup their own land, Pinoy won't win.

Whether you like or not Philippines will take it by force one day period.

@Hanis90 As much as possible, we do it in accordance with the rule of law. It's up to you, if you want that way.

We are sabahan and proud filipino! Don't try to claim our land as part of malaysian!

​@@xXxSkyViperxXx WW3 is coming to our doorstep in SCS sea. Can US & its allies NATO stay in the war for a long time making PH as a battle ground of war ?

@@chuageokseng2168 are u afraid they come to malaysia to pay a quick visit for that overdue rent money? or maybe china will get there first to secure routes to indian ocean

do sabahan use Passport to enter Semenanjong?

​@@xXxSkyViperxXx Oh really?bwahahaha

Typical westoid tbf. They just want Sabah for Philippines to put US military bases in Sabah. There are US military bases and a ClA headquarter in the Philippines. The Philippines doesn't create their own issues, they just follow what their master dictates them to because the Philippines is not a sovereign country that is able to make independent decisions. How can one call themselves sovereign if they allow foreign military bases in their country?

Their corrupt president egg on by their colonial master stirring sht up in Asia. Sadly greed and inferior complex has a lot to do with it

It because they get beaten up by China. And no one care despite their cry baby. Now try to silly way of get support.

If you called it rent, where is the agreement between Sulu and Malaysia? If none, it is just like what pirates and mafia do for a living. Why in the 1878 agreement, was Malaysia not mentioned? Is there any clause in the 1878 agreement that Malaysia has the responsibility to continue paying Sulu? Why do the receipts in Sulu's possession not mention the money is for the rent? Why is the amount so small and not what has been stipulated in the agreement? One Mexican gold dollar (coins) in 1878 weighed 1.7 grams of gold. So, 5300 X 1.7/1000 = 9.01 kg of gold. Compare the value of 5300 Malaysian dollars to 9 kg of gold. Giving away money is not an offense. Can give or stop giving any time.

Loool usd1k per year... We Malaysian consider that payment to poor beggar cos we Malaysian so generous lah hahaha But sorry we also stopped paying that since 2013 because beggar misbehave hahahaha Go check Google hahaha

@liesterminator2 Is that why you get along with the CCP China really well? The same banana! Lmao!

@@hopelope1703Malaysia still didn't exist when the lease agreement was created by the Sultan of Sulu and your British Colonizer. Learn some history!

@@davisurdaneta1426 Ha ha ha ha. Brunei Sultanate grant North Borneo to BNBC on 29/12/1877. There are 4 agreements dated on the same day. British government later turned North Borneo into British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946) and finally under Malaysia Act 1963, British parliament incorporate North Borneo into Malaysia. Check it out. You need to do a lot of reading.

your just watching but you didnt understand it ,philippines not invading sabah the sultanate of sulu whos claiming the sabbah with out the consent of the republic of thephilippines, if the government the phil want to reclaim the sabah what woukd you think its just a normal claiming or it makes a war?

Technicaly, if philipine want to take sulu sultanate teritory in sabah by force from malaysia, no country will deffend malaysia as philipine have deffence pact with USA, and philipine is an important ally for USA. So USA will helping philipine and no one will helping malaysia, not UK, Aus and NZ. They all will be silent. Singapore also will be silent since they are US sweetheart Indonesia also will be silent, and mostly will suppporting philipine since indonesian relation with philipine is closer than with malaysia. Philipine also not the type of country who like to claim other country's teritory, in which this benefiting indonesia as andaman block will be safe from teritorial claim. Although china will come offering for help, malaysian government are not that stupid to accept chinese offer.

Malaysia tried to invade and claim Sabah unsuccessfull

@@thegrandlord2914 well said..

@@xXxSkyViperxXx source?

It's as if Mexico want California back under its administration, Californian won't want to be under poorer country. Same for Sabahan, they wont want to be under poorer country, Philippine.

Sabahan Here! HEll no for sulu! We ARE MALAYASIAN

Nah I don't want to be in that Poorliphines.

The existence of the Sulu sultanate is not recognized by the world, even the Manila government itself does not recognize the Sulu sultanate. Sulu has no right to North Borneo. Sulu's claim to North Borneo is false and their claim has failed many times in the ICJ. Through the 1962 Cobbold Commission referendum, the majority of Sabahans have agreed to choose to form a Malaysian federation. The Sulu@Suluk people who flooded in Sabah were war refugees from the Philippine president Ferdinand Marcos era and these Sulu@Suluk immigrants continue to enter Sabah until today.

Sorry. My ancestors never eat trash and so do I. Nobody in Sabah want to eat pagpag😂

@Shlomayo Just pay what is due from you and you can still be under on wherever you want. We don't want to administer land grabbers and thieves! We'll be contaminated by them! Lol!

@@fernandocruz4877 Pay what is due from me? What would that be?

PM Najib, his wife and many other Malaysian officials were all involved in the 1MDB Scandal. The "inept" Philippines had been the fastest growing economy in the ASEAN Region in 2023 and has overtaken Malaysia as well as Vietnam in terms of Nominal GDP and is projected to remain so every year from 2023. 😫

Tereyorial dispute is not about personal emotional.Happy or not Sabah belongs to Philippines for Malaysia is just renting the place.

@@KakosamoTV malaysia has stopped paying to a beggar since 2013..

What is your evidence?

Super moron.. go to the court if you want evidence​@@hopelope1703

Hai from Brunei - yes you absolutely right

Lol 50% of Sabah was claimed by sulu

😂 Sulu already ruled Sabah before Brunei. Look up Lupah Sug era and its ruler who ruled Sabah-Kalimantan, Palawan, and Sulu. The Chinese Emperor said that Sulu ruled it.

@@renesarabia6442 Sulu already ruled Sabah before Brunei HAHAHA 🤣🤣🤣 said man who not Bruneian

@@renesarabia6442 Sulu already ruled Sabah before Brunei HAHAHA 🤣🤣🤣 said man who not Bruneian

Just pay the heirs of Sultan of Sulu, and you can still use their land.😂🤣

Nope. Can tell them to start learning how to climb coconut trees, collect and sell the fruits for money. Bc they wont get a penny from us.

Through the 1962 Cobbold Commission referendum, the majority of Sabahans have agreed to choose to form a Malaysian federation.

Be careful of what you wish for.

Yup.. but im sabahan.. i dont wanna be part of Philippines

😂😂😂 malaysia and china is pirates claim 😁😁

@@room6667 so? what can poor peenoise do? Still need to wash toilets in Chinese homes hahaha

The Philippines already have problems with China, is the Philippines ready to have problems with Malaysia too?

yes…because we malaysian have Musang King Pinoy only have banana😊

@@baharm65 musang king kill at eating the crocodile 😂😂😂

They already prove it. Even the British admitted they have an agreement to the Sulu Sultanate in History. This prove Sulu Sultanate owned that land. Even Malaysia agreed. They even paid rent to the land from the Sulu Sultanate. ......

@@GolDRoger-fx2fp How do you explain the existence of two agreements related to the ownership of North Borneo (Sabah) namely between Brunei Sultanate & BNBC (29/12/1877) and Sulu & BNBC (22/17/1878)? The only existing agreement involving the Sultanate of Brunei (original owner) is that agreement that Brunei granted and ceded North Borneo to BNBC on 29/12/1877. If the Brunei Sultanate had given North Borneo to Sulu much earlier, his majesty would not have signed that 1877 agreement. The signing confirms North Borneo belongs to Brunei and not Sulu. Why is there no protest from Sulu to Brunei for signing the 1877 agreement? Why was the Sulu & BNBC agreement not signed earlier in 1877 but 3 weeks later (1878) after the signing of the 1877 agreement. The original agreement in Tausug is missing during His Majesty's trip to Singapore, Thus, the validity of Sulu ownership of North Borneo is doubtful. How on earth can Sulu own North Borneo if there is no undisputable proof that the Brunei Sultanate gave it to them earlier? Unless there is a possibility the British had been scammed, deceived, or intimidated by Sulu into signing that 1878 agreement? The first agreement (1877) with the original owner is more valid in court.

@@GolDRoger-fx2fp 3: SULU: RENT. If you called it rent, where is the agreement between Sulu and Malaysia? If none, it is just like what pirates and mafia do for a living. Why in the 1878 agreement, was Malaysia not mentioned? Is there any clause in the 1878 agreement that Malaysia has the responsibility to continue paying Sulu? Why do the receipts in Sulu's possession not mention the money is for the rent? Why is the amount so small and not what has been stipulated in the agreement? One Mexican gold dollar (coins) in 1878 weighed 1.7 grams of gold. So, 5300 X 1.7/1000 = 9.01 kg of gold. Compare the value of 5300 Malaysian dollars to 9 kg of gold. Giving away money is not an offense. Can give or stop giving any time.

@@hopelope1703 they what you called to the payment of Malaysia and British before to the Sultanate of Sulu? You should answer it first....

@@hopelope1703 the fact is there still a payment duties of Malaysia to the Sultanate of Sulu forever. How can you explain that? YOU CAN'T, I KNOW WHY.😅

Greedy begets greedy.😆😅😂🤣

We join brics so we wont be too dependent on west colonialism(weaponised dollar)

@@syede5ign Join anything you want but pay for the land that you've stolen.😂🤣

@@syede5ign thats not a bad decision of course because everyone wants balance between west and east but its like playing with a demon that can backstab you

@@YobeOllipse one acts like a power-tripping policeman, and the other acts like a sly businessman or debt collector. We Asean don't need to fight each other, or it will be Middle East 2.0 if these super powers decide to interfere.

The referendum is sham it not widely spread among sabah it's limited only to the few people who is not educated & doesn't know what they are voting for so it's rejected

as the name says Cobbold which means a Brithish citizen.No wonder this commission supports Malaysia

@@earljames7478 Nope, this commission is under the UN and works on the mandate of the UN. Malaysia is a sovereign country and recognized by the UN. Sulu is a fairy tale kingdom that does not get recognition from the UN and any country in the world including the government of Manila itself.

That referendum is rejected because in Sabah at that time uneducated, not informed properly only selected few misleading the Sabahan

Maybe you can tell your government to devide into 2 , 1 for ur people 1 for ours, that SABAH is legally own by Philippines

You must be Noted that Sultanate of Sulu gained and won case vs British North borneo in France just recently between 2020 to 2024

I wonder why they don’t conduct a plebiscite then unlike what they did for Sarawak? What could they have feared the outcome would be? Instead they have a “committee” decide.

tsk tsk lots of nonsense from this Malaysian...

@@xXxSkyViperxXx lol u can cry nonsense whatever.... Just bring a passport when visiting sabah Malaysia and don't overstay u will go to prison hahaha

I think the reference that should be used here is the documents agreed upon bynorthern borneo and the sultan of sulu... There is no Malaysia there...😂😂😂 Correct dont he a hypocrite Malaysia...

@@I..am..111 Ha ha ha ha. Sulu slready relinquished her territories and dependencies to Spain under the Bases of Peace and Capitulation dated 22/7/1878. Check it out. The border between North Borneo and PH been decided under the Border Delimitation Convention between the British and US in 1930. That border line remains to this day. Sulu has nothing.

@@hopelope1703 The sultanate of sulu relinquished her territory reallyyyyyy hahahahaha. That's why the sulu sultanate filed a arbitration case in Spain and France against Malaysia which the sultanate won amounting to 15 billion of Malaysian assets. Hahahahahaha Relinquished really WRONG.. If the sultanate of sulu relinquished their territorial claim on sabah by definition the sultanate of sulu has no more claim on sabah, and why the sultanate of sulu won the arbitration case against Malaysia if they relinquished their territorial claim hahahhahahahaha. TRY AGAIN 🤣🤣

Malaysia was not the owner of sabah, even the population of sabah the kadasandusuns DNA is similar to Visayas region of the phil. Therefore kadasandusuns are our blood brothers, compare the DNA of the kadasundusun to a pure Malaysia vs the Visayan regions of the phil. You will know that they are our blood brother,

@@I..am..111 No such arbitration case exist because from the very start, there are at least 2 dozen claimant to the Sulu throne. Also legally, it's impossible to win such a case without considering the opinion of the true owners of Sabah, the Sabahans. Anyway, if that guy had won 15 billion of Malaysian assets, whatever the hell that is....why the hell is he a poor old bastard now incapable of even paying for his medical bills? You Pinoys just love to make shit up in your head yeah.

But Brunel give Sabah to the Sultanate of Sulu and the Clan of Sultanate who own the Sabah surrender to the Philippine government, So I therefore conclude that Sabah is belong to the Philippines 🇵🇭

@@ruelfadera7294 bullshit that never happen

​@@ruelfadera7294did u knw that Sulu claim only in the EAST COAST of Sabah not the WHOLE sabah. And the east coast of sabah is just a small land like 10-15% while the rest are still under Sultanate of Brunei.

borneo not brunei😂😂😂

says who you? what is the payment of malaysia to the heirs about? you do not pay what you said you already owned

Go back to history my friend

Why Malaysia is paying rent for Sabah

tell it to the malaysians. you people are arguing as well with china taking your territory as well yet you come claiming sabah which is not yours in the first place and have been paying lease money for the past century and decades

@@armandoabelido4995 Where is the agreement that Malaysia is require to pay the rent?

@sengcreate3060 They're not kicking you out. The owners are asking you to pay what's due to them as per arbitral ruling. Follow the rule of law.

​@@fernandocruz4877 but we are kicking you out..

@kevar394 What? Who said you kicked out us? You've been judged! Land grabbers and thieves!😂🤣

​@@fernandocruz4877 Its not Rent ..or lease.. ya fool. Its SYMPATHY.. Malaysia MALAY RULERS (The SULTAN'S) sympathises with the downfall of Sulu Sulatanate. The downfall where COLONIALIST.. Spainards /Americans ..destroyed i deleted ts Culture. !! Look at your NAME .. ya cleansed of ya own culture!!. Ya MEXICAN of Asia. Whatever SULU sulatane land is LOST when they were beaten by these .. Ya cant claim something when ya lost it. It was carved n divided amongst the Colonialist. Even now the Kiram has its decendence disputed. Many claiming as TRUE Ruler.. 😂😂😂. WtF.... Get on with ya live... will ya. Ya easily MANIPULATED by ya POLITICIANS

@kevar394 Just pay $14.93B to the heirs of Sultan of Sulu, and you (maybe) can still use the land.😂🤣

Looool malaysia already won

Possession is 9/10th of the law.

​@@justasking5069.9/10

There is a court case recorded in 2001 by ICJ (International Court of Justice, The Hague) about the Philippines' claims on North Borneo. It is a special 37-page report by ICJ that was published in 2001 and is easily accessible from the ICJ official website. It was a trial within a trial in the main court case between Malaysia and Indonesia over the ownership of the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan in Sabah. Philippines which is not a party to the trial requested permission to intervene. To comply with Article 62 of the Statute of the Court, the Philippines stated the objectives for the intervention (Section 7 & 84) namely, to safeguard and preserve the Philippines' historical and legal rights (only found in the 1973 PH Constitution) over North Borneo and to inform the court of the effect or effect of the court outcomes of the trial on its claim to the territories. In that trial, Philippines lawyers explained their case especially the Sulu-Ovenbeck 1878 agreement (primal reference) and related information to the court (Section 44 & 83). The same 15 main court judges were sitting at the bench and Malaysian and Indonesian lawyers too were present. On 23 October 2001, by a 14 to 1 vote, the court rejected the Philippine's request on the ground that there is “no interest of legal nature” (Section 93). (Meaning Sulu/PH claim on Sabah is null and void) Type the statement below and go to the official ICJ website (a 37-page report): INTIZRNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER PULAU LIGITAN AND PULAU SIPADAN APPLICATION BY THE PHILIPPINES FOR PERMISSION TO INTERVENE JUDGMENT OF 23 OCTOBER 2001

Sulu claimants also lost all their arbitration court cases in Europe (Spain, France, Netherlands, and Luxembourg) in 2023.

MalAysia knew it. It connived with the British to land grab North Borneo from the Sultanate of Sulu. MalAysia became greedy!

what kind of property,if owned parmanently forever???this is part of the document,next to leasin part,this is not same thing as house sale,its literally buyin sellin country

North Borneo was leased by the British from the Sultanate of Sulu. It's documented.😊

tiny britain a small island surrounded by oceans claimed most of the world and made the largest empire of humans

It's because you never learned history

Sabah is part of the ph.❤❤❤❤❤

Not really. Filipinos and Indonesians cross over to Sabah to go to their traditional fishing grounds or trading areas and they are jailed and deported. Indonesians and Filipinos freely cross over in Balut Island and Las Palmas without border issues. Think of it as 3 siblings with the youngest being the greedy troublesome brother but thats life. In a family there is always drama. Just hope when China invades, that these siblings will unite

China is only interested in their historic claims due to disputes after WW2, messed up by Anglo-Saxon. There are 14 bordering countries to China, only 4 disputes left to be resolved. All small cuntries surrounded China never been fear of Chinese invasion, like Laos, Myanmar, Bhutan, Nepal, Pakistan, Afganistan, Krygistan, Takjistan, Kazakstan, Mongolia, Vietnam and N.Korea. But they will never allow US to set up vessel states to their borders, just like Russia, its destine for war.

Philippines MP asked. Show us your childhood days n Malaysia.

Illegal migration. Malaysia arrests hundreds of Indonesians, Burmese, Rohingya, Philippines illegal immigrants every day.

@@SonnyGulanesPHcontinue delusion.

@UlyaGaniya. Heh, why not let the elephant in the area stake a claim too. Would be even more exciting if China decides to throw in a claim for Sabah just for shits and giggles..lol

I'm from Indonesia, we don't want to claim Sabah, Indonesia is too big, we're not greedy people

@@derryntumorang5485No need to do that, China is already doing some hideous and insideous things in Northern and Eastern part of Indonesia, particularly Indonesian Borneo's Kalimantan Provinces, Sulawesi, Mollucas, Ambon and it's surrounding Islands, Indonesian West Papua Region. They're actually part of China's Greater Plan to create conflict between Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines. It's also had counterparts Chinese Plan in Visayas, Palawan and Mindanao Region of the Philippines and Eastern Malaysia(Sarawak, Sabah and the Federal District of Labuan), also Brunei and Timor-Leste, Singapore to add to screw and subvert Malaysia and Indonesia to follow and align with China if they try to go against it.

@@romeocivilino6667 paid by NED bro? Seems political fiction taken from the book of CIA 😅

Why bitter its the truth in the wps that is ours eez exclusive ecomic zone not you were not coward

shrinkong?? we have the benham rise as addition to our territory?

haha they sure "can defend" hahahaha. meanwhuile Malaysia cannot even defend Spratlys from china.... Malaysia is shrinking fast....

@@xXxSkyViperxXx have u read any news china is restricting malaysian fishermen going around its water??.. Unlike Philippines, you never heard any news about it... Not just that, malaysian oil drill is still operating normally... That say alot how malaysia handle china claim...

@@umaiman3576 cuz malaysian fishermen are too scared to fish over there, especially such small area of claim for them anyways. oil rigs are untouched of course, theyre already established structures. china only polices boats that are able to be moved away

Sabah🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭♥️♥️♥️💪💪💪

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

If you called it rent, where is the agreement between Sulu and Malaysia? If none, it is just like what pirates and mafia do for a living. Why in the 1878 agreement, was Malaysia not mentioned? Is there any clause in the 1878 agreement that Malaysia has the responsibility to continue paying Sulu? Why do the receipts in Sulu's possession not mention the money is for the rent? Why is the amount so small and not what has been stipulated in the agreement? One Mexican gold dollar (coins) in 1878 weighed 1.7 grams of gold. So, 5300 X 1.7/1000 = 9.01 kg of gold. Compare the value of 5300 Malaysian dollars to 9 kg of gold. Giving away money is not an offense. Can give or stop giving any time.

Any Filipino and Sulu supporters would point to the 1878 agreement and claim that Sabah was lease to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). But there are numerous evidence to point that Sulu did not previously own Sabah as the self-proclaimed Sulu heirs would suggest, the claim that the Sultanate of Brunei gifted North Borneo (Sabah) to the Sultanate of Sulu as a gift can be disputed and debunked by the following evidence: - 1877 Agreement Prior to the 1878 Agreement which was signed between the British North Borneo Company (BNBC) and the Sultanate of Sulu, there was an agreement that was signed in 1877 between the Sultanate of Brunei and the British North Borneo Company. Within this agreement, the word “grant” has been used numerous times. It’s also stated within the agreement that the entirety of North Borneo (Sabah) will be ceded to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC) for 15,000 Mexican gold coins . With these statements, it’s clear that the Sulu Sultanate did not own North Borneo (Sabah) and that the 1878 agreement is redundant. I would also like to point out that within the 1878 agreement, the word “pajak” was meant to be stated a “grant and cede”, and within the receipts of the so-called “rent payments” are listed as cession payment. Cession means to give something away. With that this proves that the 1878 Agreement wasn’t a lease agreement but rather a cession agreement. But let’s say for the sake of argument that the Sultanate of Brunei gifted North Borneo (Sabah) to the Sultanate of Sulu and that the Sultanate of Sulu did indeed own Sabah and that the 1878 agreement was a lease agreement. Yet the Sultanate of Sulu has signed many agreements which relinquishes their rights over Sabah. These are the following: - 1878 Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement This agreement highlights the Sultanate of Sulu’s surrender of sovereignty to Spain. This means that anything happens whether internal or external affairs is under Spanish jurisdiction. - Article III of the Madrid Protocol of 1885 The Madrid Protocol of 1885 was an agreement between the United Kingdom, Germany, and Spain to recognise Spain’s rule over the Sulu Archipelago. There is a particular statement within Article III which states that Spain will relinquish all of their claims on Borneo. This alongside with the 1878 Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement as stated previously shows that the Sultanate of Sulu now no longer have any jurisdiction over North Borneo (Sabah). This also means that North Borneo (Sabah) is now under complete British jurisdiction. - 1903 Confirmation of Cession This agreement was signed between the Sultanate of Sulu and the British North Borneo Company (BNBC) in which it states that the Sultanate of Sulu will grant and cede North Borneo (Sabah) as well as additional islands which is how the payment of 5,000 Mexican gold coins which at this point has switched entirely to the Malayan dollar increased to 5,300 Malayan dollars. - 1915 Carpenter Agreement This agreement was signed between the Sultanate of Sulu and the United States. Within this agreement it states that any power that the Sultan of Sulu has over his land has been given to the Philippines which is under American-rule. - 1930 Anglo-US Border Convention This agreement was signed between the United States and the United Kingdom. This agrement also define the border of North Borneo (Sabah) and the Philippines with the agreement being that North Borneo (Sabah) will remain under British jurisdiction and the Philippines being under American jurisdiction. - 1963 Malaysia Agreement and Malaysia Act of 1963 Finally this agreement was signed between the United Kingdom, Malaya, Singapore, Sarawak, and North Borneo (Sabah) to form a new country now known as Malaysia. Now that North Borneo (Sabah) has gained it’s independence from the UK, they opted to join this agreement and with the previous agreements signed, it means that North Borneo (Sabah) now have self-determination. And with the UK approving this agreement under the Malaysia Act of 1963 which has been passed in the British Parliament. This agreement has also been recognised by the United Nations and agreed on by the UN General Assembly and the UN Secretary-General himself. This means that Sabah is now rightful Malaysian territory. With all of these facts in place, it’s clear that Sabah rightfully belongs to Malaysia and neither the Philippines nor Sulu have any legal claims over Sabah.

Show your evidence.

Don't blame the British. Can Sulu show evidence that the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave Sabah to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war? So far, the record said NONE. Only pirates will do such a thing claiming something that does NOT belong to them.

​@@hopelope1703😂😂

@@hopelope1703 its not none if you dont know how to find what they already showed. dont blame anyone here if they dont care to show u the legal documents that are reserved for the legal courts

We can agree on that! Just look at Israel Middle East problem now!

But sulu is part of.phils😂

Malaysians go back to the Peninsula..

Malaysians go back to the Peninsula..

@@nedlabisa2965 So Philippines agree that Sultanate of Sulu is a sovereign nation same like Sultanate of Johor or Sultanate Of Perak, and Sulus are not to be govern by Philippines President and instead govern by its Sultan? Guess not, Sulus will never be under Philippines.

@@nedlabisa2965 Phils has more problems at hand than to declare Sabah as its own. Better solve your own problem first

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

Any Filipino and Sulu supporters would point to the 1878 agreement and claim that Sabah was lease to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). But there are numerous evidence to point that Sulu did not previously own Sabah as the self-proclaimed Sulu heirs would suggest, the claim that the Sultanate of Brunei gifted North Borneo (Sabah) to the Sultanate of Sulu as a gift can be disputed and debunked by the following evidence: - 1877 Agreement Prior to the 1878 Agreement which was signed between the British North Borneo Company (BNBC) and the Sultanate of Sulu, there was an agreement that was signed in 1877 between the Sultanate of Brunei and the British North Borneo Company. Within this agreement, the word “grant” has been used numerous times. It’s also stated within the agreement that the entirety of North Borneo (Sabah) will be ceded to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC) for 15,000 Mexican gold coins . With these statements, it’s clear that the Sulu Sultanate did not own North Borneo (Sabah) and that the 1878 agreement is redundant. I would also like to point out that within the 1878 agreement, the word “pajak” was meant to be stated a “grant and cede”, and within the receipts of the so-called “rent payments” are listed as cession payment. Cession means to give something away. With that this proves that the 1878 Agreement wasn’t a lease agreement but rather a cession agreement. But let’s say for the sake of argument that the Sultanate of Brunei gifted North Borneo (Sabah) to the Sultanate of Sulu and that the Sultanate of Sulu did indeed own Sabah and that the 1878 agreement was a lease agreement. Yet the Sultanate of Sulu has signed many agreements which relinquishes their rights over Sabah. These are the following: - 1878 Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement This agreement highlights the Sultanate of Sulu’s surrender of sovereignty to Spain. This means that anything happens whether internal or external affairs is under Spanish jurisdiction. - Article III of the Madrid Protocol of 1885 The Madrid Protocol of 1885 was an agreement between the United Kingdom, Germany, and Spain to recognise Spain’s rule over the Sulu Archipelago. There is a particular statement within Article III which states that Spain will relinquish all of their claims on Borneo. This alongside with the 1878 Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement as stated previously shows that the Sultanate of Sulu now no longer have any jurisdiction over North Borneo (Sabah). This also means that North Borneo (Sabah) is now under complete British jurisdiction. - 1903 Confirmation of Cession This agreement was signed between the Sultanate of Sulu and the British North Borneo Company (BNBC) in which it states that the Sultanate of Sulu will grant and cede North Borneo (Sabah) as well as additional islands which is how the payment of 5,000 Mexican gold coins which at this point has switched entirely to the Malayan dollar increased to 5,300 Malayan dollars. - 1915 Carpenter Agreement This agreement was signed between the Sultanate of Sulu and the United States. Within this agreement it states that any power that the Sultan of Sulu has over his land has been given to the Philippines which is under American-rule. - 1930 Anglo-US Border Convention This agreement was signed between the United States and the United Kingdom. This agrement also define the border of North Borneo (Sabah) and the Philippines with the agreement being that North Borneo (Sabah) will remain under British jurisdiction and the Philippines being under American jurisdiction. - 1963 Malaysia Agreement and Malaysia Act of 1963 Finally this agreement was signed between the United Kingdom, Malaya, Singapore, Sarawak, and North Borneo (Sabah) to form a new country now known as Malaysia. Now that North Borneo (Sabah) has gained it’s independence from the UK, they opted to join this agreement and with the previous agreements signed, it means that North Borneo (Sabah) now have self-determination. And with the UK approving this agreement under the Malaysia Act of 1963 which has been passed in the British Parliament. This agreement has also been recognised by the United Nations and agreed on by the UN General Assembly and the UN Secretary-General himself. This means that Sabah is now rightful Malaysian territory. With all of these facts in place, it’s clear that Sabah rightfully belongs to Malaysia and neither the Philippines nor Sulu have any legal claims over Sabah.

Eww . Pagpag

You are a wise person who understands the people's rights. The locals chose to be with Malaysia instead of Sulu or Philippines, the land is theirs and theu ahve the right to voice out their opinions.

@@aldenteh9412 I love our Philippines government but if they do things like this I will not support their actions

@@TheRandomGuyLife tell the malaysian government to continue their overdue lease payments then

We don't believe you

Sabah should be part of Indonesia coz it's part of the whole Borneo Kalimantan family plus Sabahan speaks Indonesian language not Msian 😊😊

No Ur not Pilipino 😂😂😂

@@gerrydevilla3285 I'm a Filipino-American from NYC. You don't get to tell me that I'm not a Filipino just cause I have a different opinion. I am an ethnic Filipino from my parents by blood and an American by my nationality through birthright.

@@gerrydevilla3285 Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

​@dominicperez3777 you are American 😂.

@@hopelope1703 THANK YOU. Someone finally understands that Sabah belongs to Malaysia!

Why would Malaysia’s interpretation be used in an agreement they were not party to? It was between the British and the Sultanate of Sulu, now you either believe in the term padjak as rent as interpreted by the heirs of the Sultan Sulu as they accepted the contract or of the imperialist colonialist British Government representatives in the many forms they existed there. As a person of fair judgment, do you believe the British Imperialists of the era who might have been engaging in less than fair negotiations or the Sultans of the Sultanate of Sulu who would rent his territory out. Would you believe that the Sultanate of Sulu would cede his land for rent?? First, it is unlikely as the heirs have already expressed the intentions of their family then, and secondly since it is not a historical internationally recognized way to cede land through rent. In any case, even the grabbing of the land by the Federation of Malaya by committee rather than by plebiscite as they have done with neighboring Sarawak shows there was something afoot! Why have a plebiscite in Sarawak but not in Sabah? Couldn’t trust the population to side with the Federation of Malaya versus the Philippines, knowing then that most of the population had stronger ties and loyalty to their kin and Sultan in Sulu? Why was it that even before the Federation of Malaya, local North Borneo courts sided with the heirs of the Sultan - wasn’t because they knew it was legitimate and the honorable thing to do as fellow Muslims? They took advantage of the situation, and unlike Singapore which was able to break free of that federation, Sabah has yet to find its freedom.

@@aaron1983 that's what happened then someone took advantage of the incident. The world already knew who and what the British could do back then. It's just sad that even Malaysia is still playing games even now, that they even know what really happened back then. Due to the greed for power and territory, being a Muslim is disappearing.

No, not in Spanish time. No European colonialists ever conquered the Sultanate of Sulu. Unfortunately it was defeated during Moro-US War which ended in 1913. That's why the Sultanate of Sulu gave their domains (including North Borneo) and allegiance to the American gov't of the Philippine Islands. You're talking about other Sultanate especially in now peninsular MalAysia which they embraced their conquerors, I.e. Portuguese, Dutch and British. Never in history it ever fought its colonisers.😆😅😂🤣

What a crap Spanish was never present in Sabah.

@seekersoul3439 Yes, only the British when the Sultan of Sulu allowed it! Are all sabahans dayaks? What history told us was that they're all mainland Chinese. No pun intended for Chinese, I don't hate them. They live amongst us. What I hated most is the CCP and its ideology. The ideology that was borrowed from the West, specifically from Karl Marx. His ideology was not even practised in Europe right now. Even the Soviet discarded it. Karl Marx ideology is outdated and obsolete in the present time.

@@fernandocruz4877 nope. Sabah was never sultan sulu. Period. Base on your argument, Philippines should not been exist as it should be call Sulu or sultan of Sulu. If ever you believe history and country definition should happen at the time that you define. Sabah and Sarawak official become Malaysia under UN and international observers with reformdeum that conducted with International with Philippines agreement and part of it. Since Philippines like to talk about international law. 😆 and that stay till today. Ask any Sabah folks are they prefer to be Philippino? Even the illegal immigrants from Philippines choose not to be Philippines. How is PRC and eg is other topic. But one thing for sure I can say Philippines nowadays is like Karen of South East Asia, keep on causing disturbance and tension within the region. And is annoying by the neighbour. Ever wonder why incident last week with China not a single ASEAN country speak up for Philippines. Because Philippines now is Karen in all our eye. Period.

You dream wet...

nonsense

Sabah is an island mostly living are filipinos

@@dheyrose they are mostly illegals

@@dheyrose not true

@@kevar394 You are absent in your history subject even my great grandparents knows about that sabah until now are filipino minority speaking language and also borneo the owners was a sultan of jolo, sulu

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

Any Filipino and Sulu supporters would point to the 1878 agreement and claim that Sabah was lease to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). But there are numerous evidence to point that Sulu did not previously own Sabah as the self-proclaimed Sulu heirs would suggest, the claim that the Sultanate of Brunei gifted North Borneo (Sabah) to the Sultanate of Sulu as a gift can be disputed and debunked by the following evidence: - 1877 Agreement Prior to the 1878 Agreement which was signed between the British North Borneo Company (BNBC) and the Sultanate of Sulu, there was an agreement that was signed in 1877 between the Sultanate of Brunei and the British North Borneo Company. Within this agreement, the word “grant” has been used numerous times. It’s also stated within the agreement that the entirety of North Borneo (Sabah) will be ceded to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC) for 15,000 Mexican gold coins . With these statements, it’s clear that the Sulu Sultanate did not own North Borneo (Sabah) and that the 1878 agreement is redundant. I would also like to point out that within the 1878 agreement, the word “pajak” was meant to be stated a “grant and cede”, and within the receipts of the so-called “rent payments” are listed as cession payment. Cession means to give something away. With that this proves that the 1878 Agreement wasn’t a lease agreement but rather a cession agreement. But let’s say for the sake of argument that the Sultanate of Brunei gifted North Borneo (Sabah) to the Sultanate of Sulu and that the Sultanate of Sulu did indeed own Sabah and that the 1878 agreement was a lease agreement. Yet the Sultanate of Sulu has signed many agreements which relinquishes their rights over Sabah. These are the following: - 1878 Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement This agreement highlights the Sultanate of Sulu’s surrender of sovereignty to Spain. This means that anything happens whether internal or external affairs is under Spanish jurisdiction. - Article III of the Madrid Protocol of 1885 The Madrid Protocol of 1885 was an agreement between the United Kingdom, Germany, and Spain to recognise Spain’s rule over the Sulu Archipelago. There is a particular statement within Article III which states that Spain will relinquish all of their claims on Borneo. This alongside with the 1878 Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement as stated previously shows that the Sultanate of Sulu now no longer have any jurisdiction over North Borneo (Sabah). This also means that North Borneo (Sabah) is now under complete British jurisdiction. - 1903 Confirmation of Cession This agreement was signed between the Sultanate of Sulu and the British North Borneo Company (BNBC) in which it states that the Sultanate of Sulu will grant and cede North Borneo (Sabah) as well as additional islands which is how the payment of 5,000 Mexican gold coins which at this point has switched entirely to the Malayan dollar increased to 5,300 Malayan dollars. - 1915 Carpenter Agreement This agreement was signed between the Sultanate of Sulu and the United States. Within this agreement it states that any power that the Sultan of Sulu has over his land has been given to the Philippines which is under American-rule. - 1930 Anglo-US Border Convention This agreement was signed between the United States and the United Kingdom. This agrement also define the border of North Borneo (Sabah) and the Philippines with the agreement being that North Borneo (Sabah) will remain under British jurisdiction and the Philippines being under American jurisdiction. - 1963 Malaysia Agreement and Malaysia Act of 1963 Finally this agreement was signed between the United Kingdom, Malaya, Singapore, Sarawak, and North Borneo (Sabah) to form a new country now known as Malaysia. Now that North Borneo (Sabah) has gained it’s independence from the UK, they opted to join this agreement and with the previous agreements signed, it means that North Borneo (Sabah) now have self-determination. And with the UK approving this agreement under the Malaysia Act of 1963 which has been passed in the British Parliament. This agreement has also been recognised by the United Nations and agreed on by the UN General Assembly and the UN Secretary-General himself. This means that Sabah is now rightful Malaysian territory. With all of these facts in place, it’s clear that Sabah rightfully belongs to Malaysia and neither the Philippines nor Sulu have any legal claims over Sabah.

True and also what happened to pakista, india partition

Sight specific occurences and facts..if not, you are the karen here

@@everydayliving658 I am not the one that cause disturbance of the neighbourhood. 😆 and no stand alone cry baby and yet receive no support from the neighbourhood countries. As been 2 weeks already none of the ASEAN countries speak up for Philippines. Because all think Philippines is Karen. 😂 😂 😂

​@@seekersoul3439for all we know chinese making all this vlog about sabah divide and conquer majority of filipinos are catholic no intensión to take muslim state sabah .and wed rather see sabahan govern by malaysian than china lol

@@narutos138 thank you. Sabah is Malaysia, all the while. Malaysia though is Muslim country but all religion is allow and substantiate of Sabah is Christian, Catholic and so does Muslim. I doubt this blog were made by Chinese as its kind of anti PRC. Most probably US is behind it, as it normal way of US try to create disturbance within other people region. Likewise, Middle East, Ukraine and now South East China Sea. That is why ASEAN has been taking very strong stand on solving all the conflicts within countries that has stake involved and not involving country that has no stake insist, until lately one rookie leader decide to do other wise and been used by US as puppet.

@@seekersoul3439 if philippines want to take sabah they should have take it long time ago phil always have the backing of the american ,phil is seeing sabah as islamic state do not have shared values at all

The Sultanate of Sulu owned North Borneo. It was administered by the British thru leased contract when malaise (malays) in the peninsula where its subjects.😆😅😂🤣

​@@fernandocruz4877 your sultan is weak

We don't care you malaydesh hahahah Sabah still part of the Philippines

Said who? Malaya, the greedy!😂🤣 what did malaya have to do with North Boeneo?😂🤣

@fernandocruz4877 well malaya use to be British colony and North borneo also British colony sarawak also a British colony so after that malaysia was born About the sulu agreement was before that it went back to brunei colony and give to sulu That why not all sabah is Philippines only few small places

Geographical location has no bearing on sovereignty.

@@hopelope1703 I just ask who is the closet I didn't say it has something to do with sovereignty

@@Frobleeh Don't you want to know? The title of this vlog is "Is Sabah Filipino or Malaysian?"

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

Malaysia will pay rent sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Pinoy like to have a lot of wet dream evryday😂😂😂

​@@jmgamer7332beg some more..

Dreams are free hahaha

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

Malaysia will pay rent sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

The existence of the Sulu sultanate is not recognized by the world, even the Manila government itself does not recognize the Sulu sultanate. Sulu has no right to North Borneo. Sulu's claim to North Borneo is false and their claim has failed many times in the ICJ. Through the 1962 Cobbold Commission referendum, the majority of Sabahans have agreed to choose to form a Malaysian federation. The Sulu@Suluk people who flooded in Sabah were war refugees from the Philippine president Ferdinand Marcos era and these Sulu@Suluk immigrants continue to enter Sabah until today. If Sulu insists on seizing North Borneo, then Sulu will have to deal with the entire Dayak indigenous community of Borneo because Sabah-North Borneo is part of Borneo. Must remember! Borneo is The Land of The Head Hunter !!

@@jmgamer7332 keep begging hahaha Philippines is a beggar country 👎🤣

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

​@hopelope1703 That's why Brunei didn't join the federation of MalAysia in 1963! lol!

@@fernandocruz4877 Ha ha ha ha ha. It is their right.

@@hopelope1703 And also Singapore. hahahaha😂🤣

@@fernandocruz4877 ha ha ha ha ha. You are feeling pissed off.

Malaysia is in possession of Sabah, period.

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

Proud Pinoy ✅

LOL,, you claiming Sabah based on historical reason and the Sulu nation doesn't exist anymore...if based on same historical reason, China is right to claim the whole of South China Sea.

U are welcome to sabah Malaysia don't forget bring passport hahaha

FYI, you don't own the land. Squatters!😂🤣

@@fernandocruz4877 It's a pity for a country that has no identity... Choose a corrupt former president's son to govern the country... America's toe-licker...

I have CL Land title bro...Do you even know what is that lol...

@@hillvalent That's only entitlement. Did you pay to the real owner of the land?😂🤣

@@fernandocruz4877 Bro are you ok? Pay to whom? lol...are you referring to sultan kiram is the owner of our land? if so, he doesn't need to beg to get money from us....lol...get your facts right bro...🤣🤣🤣

Then I asked her why not? She said she's happy working for me in sabah earning ringgit Malaysia and sending most of it back to her parents. If sabah becomes part of Philippines, she will be earning alot less 😂

If she is from sulu and they get the 15B she will be richer than you. If they get the land, she will kick you out 😅

Don't delete my comments.😂🤣

@@drmamu7777 she's from Manila, a bachelor's degree holder in nursing.

@@fernandocruz4877 I did not delete your comment. I don't even know how to and there's no need to anyway

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

NO. Your corrupt government will not find favor for us here.

Same with Philippine sea. They are belong to China.

Malaysians support Acheh, South Maluku, West Papuan, and many more to be independent from Indonesia.

Why don’t you do the same and give independence to Aceh, South Maluku, and West Papua? Indonesian imperialists.

Natuna belongs to Malaysia and stop TNI genocide on Papua

You dream wet..

definitely because youre Malaysian xD then go back to malaysia and give the land back yo the owner.

Your fake Filipino hahaha you're malaydesh

Nah man! Its part of the sultanate of sulu! Which is part of the Philippines.

@@Donfacundo0616 Sultanate of sulu is not a part on the Philippine government so Philippines had no rights to claim sabah + people on sabah wants to be Malaysian rather than being a Filipino.

@@Donfacundo0616 its like saying Italy should owns almost the entire Europe, north Africa and other parts of the middle east cuz it was a part of the roman empire.

ok ninoy/pnoy

Dreams are free hahaha

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

Loko to 😂😂😂

Delusional pinoys

Malaysia will pay rent sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Welcome to Malaysia sabah state please bring passport and enough money to spend hahaha

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

Malaysia will pay rent sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

​@@jmgamer7332 all you know is begging..

The existence of the Sulu sultanate is not recognized by the world, even the Manila government itself does not recognize the Sulu sultanate. Sulu has no right to North Borneo. Sulu's claim to North Borneo is false and their claim has failed many times in the ICJ. Through the 1962 Cobbold Commission referendum, the majority of Sabahans have agreed to choose to form a Malaysian federation. The Sulu@Suluk people who flooded in Sabah were war refugees from the Philippine president Ferdinand Marcos era and these Sulu@Suluk immigrants continue to enter Sabah until today. If Sulu insists on seizing North Borneo, then Sulu will have to deal with the entire Dayak indigenous community of Borneo because Sabah-North Borneo is part of Borneo. Must remember! Borneo is The Land of The Head Hunter !!

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

Malaysia will pay rent sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

what have you shown enough to claim sabah??? The receipt of you payment to Ph for your rent? Xd

Ha ha ha ha. If there are receipts in Sulu possesion, but where is the agreement? What is written on the receipt? Does it say it is for the rent? If none, it is just like what pirates do for a living.

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

Malaysia will pay rent sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Sarawak will secede from MalAysia just like Singapore did. Brunei didn't want to join MalAysia bcoz of MalAysia greediness!😂🤣

If that is so, Malaysia should just drop it and continue their overdue lease payment, if not Sabah will really leave Msia.

Malaysia will pay rent sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

​@@xXxSkyViperxXx if Sabah really do leave Malaysia, with all the power and resources , first thing Sabah government will do is kick out all the illegal immigrants from the Philliphines .

@@kevar394 at that point, the one that will be illegal are the malaysian government personnel