Pretty sure this guy is a Ghostbuster

I heard a record cleaned with this process. I was stunned!

Great price on an ultrasonic récord cleaner! It looks like a quality machine.

G'day and greetings from Tasmania Australia 🇦🇺 thank you for showing and explaining the pros and cons of record cleaning, you explained it very well and how ultrasonic works with a chemical spray, I would like to know where I could get the chemical that you used. Once again thank you kind regards John Kinnane

This guys attitude puts me off along with the price

Hi Mares, is it any possible to spred your knowledge here in Eastern Europe?

He says 70% solution alcohol. I bought some 100% (it says so on the bottle) isopropanol, so does that mean than instead of using recommended 1.4 ounce, I should just use one ounce?

London Drugs near me in Vancouver BC has these for about $1200

It is really only possible to see what is in the grooves by looking with a magnifier.

Wow that’s a lot of work even if you can do 2 at a time. Then you have to buy new sleeves for all your records. Plus it’s £995 then new spray is £19.99 which looks like you have to use a lot of.

ROBUST is right !! will try the surfactant

The inventor just talked me out of his solution. I will look at something like a Degritter, it’s more expensive but it has a drying process.

Too bad there's no before and after to hear it.

I had to do this with my 2600 records, 2600x10min are 433 hours are 18 days ( 24 hour cleaning, no toilet breaks), this would stop me collecting vinyl. I rather accept a click here and there and use my Knosti that costs me 50,--.

Folks, this process probably does improve the sound quality of records. But it is not a magical solution. Why? Even if that machine rid every last molecule of debris and made the record 100% static free, etc, you are still at the mercy of the quality of that specific record. No two records sound the same. If they do, then your stereo is not of sufficient quality to reveal the differences and/or your listening skills are lacking. 80%+ of pressings have, at best, mediocre sound quality. 15%+ have very good sound quality. Only 1% or 2% have fantastic sound quality. And some records have zero chance to sound good, because 100% of the run sucks (like Meatloaf's Bat Out Of Hell -- they screwed up every single pressings). If you take the time and effort (and $$) to purchase dozens of copies of the exact same record (and focus on stamper codes (if you know which ones) that are known to usually sound better), you will usually eventually find one that stands out as a sonic gem -- and probably on only one of the two side -- you will have to keep hunting for great sound quality for the other side. Now, if you clean that sonic gem on a traditional and inexpensive record cleaner, it will sound better than cleaning the others on the NASA inspired record cleaner in this video. Also, if you do not professionally set up your turntable (and I mean really get it dialed in accurately), then even the best sounding records will not sound their best (they might even not sound very good, if one or more vectors of your stylus is misaligned). You must, must, must dial in the effective length of the tone-arm, the cartridge's weight, the vertical tracking alignment, the anti-skating, the overhang, the offset, the zenith angle, and the azimuth. The above is not simple, and it is very time consuming. But it will make a huge improvement for all of your records (more so than any cleaning will do). So where does the state-of-the-art machine (in this video) come in? If you have some hard to find sonic gems (white hot stamper pressings), and your turntable is dialed in as described above, then this record cleaning machine will fulfill the final step in achieving analog nirvana. Or to put the above another way: In life, there are many ways to improve upon something. In most cases, you have to compromise and choose what will get you the best results for your efforts (and for your hard earned $$). If you want to go all-out, with no compromises, then this machine is a must. But if you do not feed it cherry picked quality pressings (and most pressings have nothing special sound quality) and play those pressings on a turntable that can do justice to those pressings, then such cleanings are overkill (a cleaning with a traditional machine will do 90%+ of the job). That last 10% is important, but not if you fall short with quality pressings and fall short with turntable set-up. Cheers!

I tuned out when he said the glass record is worth nearly $100 thousand. BS!

I used one for 1 week now and the result is very disappointing. Not only it takes ages to clean records I spent 1,5 h to clean 2 records and still there was crack sounds on the records. Then I pushed the brush a bit harder to clean better witch resulted in scratches so the records we´re destroyed. In another video he says: "One 9 $ bottle lasts for 300 records" That´s the biggest lie I heard in HiFi business. The bottle costs bout 25 $ in Europe and lasted me for 5-6 records so it´s terrible expensive too!

Why is this guy wearing white gown like he works for NASA Very funny it’s just a damn vinyl Hhahaha Oldies for real.

Bullshit just handle with care of your records use the antistatic brush and replace in time the styluses that's the best for me , never used fluids on most of my records { in some i have } they leave stuff behind I have recods more than 30 years old which never used any kind of cleaning fluids on them and they are like brand new . what i saw here is complete exageration

No thanks...will stick with my Spin Clean....is it the best....no.....does it get the album totally clean....no.....BUT....I buy so many records every month it does the trick. Was getting dizzy watching this video with all the various steps and all the liquids (which I will have to constantly replace) It might be a great product but definitely do not have the patience or time. 🙈🙉 On a side note....close your eyes and listen....he sounds just like Dan Aykroyd from SNL circa 1976 🤔🤔🤔

I realise that it's tempting for you to advertise your products in the comments of everyone's videos, and spread a whole bunch of misinformation and pseudoscience in a giant wall of text. You've put so much nonsense into such a tighly packed, poorly worded and confusing paragraph that it would take forever to respond to every bonkers, made-up statement that you've just dropped in the comments. but I can easily address a few. As you'll notice on the listening before and after test, there are no pops or clicks on the cleaned version, so there goes at least one of your made-up fake terms like 'microwelding'. 'release agent' is something you've made up and continue to repeat, despite actual chemists and vinyl press operators trying to correct you. The record label is not damaged at all with the 'skewering' method as you call it. If it damaged it, then any normal use of putting a record on a record player spindle would damage it. You mention having a 'patented kirmuss method' constantly, however the only patent I can find that you have for the machine is simply the part that holds and spins the record. While I think that's neat, and good on you for making it, it changes nothing for the cleaning process apart from limiting how many records are cleaned at once. I only cleaned one record at a time in this video so... problem solved. You can mention 'ionizing agent' in an attempt to sound plausible all you want, but I'm not seeing any evidence. Basically you'll need more than a cheap lab coat and clip board costume to convince people that your method is anything but an elaborate ruse tacked on to a normal ultrasonic cleaner (that is doing all the work, not your shaving brush and foaming cream). And the same goes for your nonsense cables.

I can solve all your problems and save you time and $$$, it's called streaming music LOL!