Neville could have easily replaced Harry in these movies honestly, he’s a great character and has pretty much the same backstory as Harry.

I disagree

@@MetastaticMaladies And Matthew Lewis did an amazing job with his character. Every bit as great an actor as Daniel Ratcliffe.

The other "boy who lived" :(

@@llanitedaveAnd didn’t he ever grow up. I doubt many people in the first movie would have picked him as the one who grow up so hot.

Yeah I don't understand how so many people can f****** watch the movie and hear that she tortured them and get oh she killed them

Hahaha 🤣 ​@@brandibastian4193

@@brandibastian4193 because that's usually what happens when people get tortured but never give in, they get killed, and you never see his parents around and he says he's gonna avenge them, I know it's frustrating when you know what actually happened and others don't get it right away but it's pretty understandable that people get confused and think they got killed, they could've explained it a little better.

@@mario_gabriel they never should have cut out the scenes at the hospital in the 5th movie I feel like they were pretty important for Neville I mean maybe they didn't want to pay to have the Lockhart guy back but you know they could always just have some nurse walk by exasperated with his behavior

@@brandibastian4193 ofc it would happen if we had the hospital scene x) For sure oon the serie And also they never say specifically say that she kill or not

I never hated Gilderoy Lockhart. He was more of a joke than anything. I wouldn't even bother putting him on a list of most hated characters. 🤷

Who hates Lockhart? He was a fraud and a joke, but not hateworthy.

He is up there for me. Hate a scammer, especially how he adds his whole book collection to the curriculum for all students

Lockhart was so full of himself and I can't stand people like that. But Umbridge is if Lockhart was sadistic.

Lockhart? That guy is more of a joke than anything else.

Good thing I was looking through comments, so I didn't doubleposted

What a sad lore. Plot twist is that they literally knew nothing, so torturing them for info was a waste of time

Voldimort had a purpose. Umbridge was evil for the sake of hiding the truth, even when the evidence was there. Even Voldimort didnt hide blatant truths.

I not Happy

Preach. Love her

Plus she doesn’t care what people think or say about her. Even though she’s a Ravenclaw, she has a Gryffindor side to her as well.

I honestly think Luna and Harry would have been a good couple possibly. :) they are cute together and understand one another.

Moreover, the son of his own bully.

Went down hill from there. This is what a wizard battle should be. All the other fights are just disarming your opponent. No creativity in the fights, where there are millions of different spells you could be throwing at your enemy

same. and it was mad bc i read the books after watching the films, so when it came to that point in the book i was actually disappointed😂 the part the film added was great, it’s not often you prefer the film scene to a book

And it was in the presence of a muggle who already knew about magic, and had seen it many times before. The disappearing glass at the zoo, growing a pig tail, the floating cake, Aunt Marge blowing up and floating away, several other things that were in the books, but not in the movies. And of course, seeing all those owl-delivered letters in the first movie. And yet, nobody brings this up in the hearing.

Yea she kind of guessed it early on, which kind of ruins the plot twists

I think that's because. . . and I hate to be this person, but. . . she's seen these movies before, and she's faking it for views. I've had several moments over the series so far where I wondered, but when she "guessed" that Umbridge was going to use the quill to torture Harry? Fairly solid evidence.

​@@JessieNebulousGaming Exactly.

​@@JessieNebulousGaming I mean you could easily use that as evidence of the contrary, no? If she was faking it wouldn't she be motivated to avoid "guessing" what she knows is about to happen?

​@@JessieNebulousGaming​ You don't have to be THAT smart to figure out that the quill is nefarious. If you thought that was gonna be a normal writing instrument, you're in the minority

Same here!

I didn't really like it

So this is what single guys do..

yeah and it was written by you a pathetic single all the videos you've recorded and photos you've taken posted on your social media confirm that you're a single in all these photos and videos only you can be seen

No shit Sherlock....!

That was a rumour daniel radcliffe himself has denied it and no way would they have him on set if that really happened. His emotion in that scene was bc he was losing his acting mentor, Gary Oldman

That sounds too ridiculous to be true... and turns out, yeah, it is too ridiculous.

That's not true. Radcliffe is just a great actor

@@rileytruax766 maybe big didn’t need to be in there but just was meaning that it would of told the audiences who didn’t read the book why he had to keep going back.

​@@rileytruax766I beg to differ, this is important. Almost everybody reacting to HP get really confused as to why he keeps returning to the Dursleys.

Same it is perfect timing

Stop helping

I cut it myself:) got copyrighted heavily on this movie so yeah this is not the full movie and very edited! For the uncut version it’s on my patreon.com/colettecherry

I worked on megalopolis movie set for 3 months as a background actor in Atlanta last year!

@@jbwade5676 what happened lol im confused

@@nataliekhr Lord of the rings the Return of the king i sad 😞😞😞😭😭😢😢💔💔

@@jbwade5676 oh

@@nataliekhr yeah I give up

Yeah - she got a little on the nose with her predictions of the plot. No way she hasn't watched this.

Lol talking shit but still watched the whole series 😂😂

And calls them "half breeds"

This is all your fault man I not Happy

Because she tells him to use her quil and not his in a very malicious tone… obviously alluding to her punishing him in some way with her quil. It’s really not complex or deep to guess what she means. Harry Potter movies are sometimes predictable in a GOOD way. The plot twists make sense a lot of the time , sometimes they catch me off guard. But most of them are hinted at over and over. It is my job to dissect every line. I’m not just watching on a whim. I am pausing and rewinding constantly. Often watching a scene 3-4 times back to back before continuing. We have seen how umbridge is cruel and evil and it doesn’t take a genius to figure out what she is going to do to Harry in this scene as her hatred has been building for a while

@@ColetteCherry "It doesn't take a genius to figure out what she is going to do to Harry in this scene." I have been watching reactions to this movie for years. Nobody guesses that part. Ever. Yes, it's obvious that she's going to do *something* awful, but that quill could do absolutely ANYTHING. This is magic, after all. And jumping to "torture" straight off the bat is suspicious. As I've said, this is not the only incident that has made me think this. Futhermore, the fact you spent the time and energy to write such a long reply to me when you haven't responded to a *single other comment*, all of which are otherwise PRAISING you. . . well, that isn't a good look for your innocence. If you didn't do it, you should laugh, roll your eyes, and move on with your life.

@@ColetteCherry Also, how are you watching a scene 3 to 4 times over *while* recording a video that patreons can sync up with a copy of the movie on patreon? That. . . doesn't make sense.

Bingo. She only attacks people critical of her.

Not just you. ​@rileytruax766 She deleted mine and another person's comments for calling her out. Also kinda sus how 90% of her responses appear to be to outspoken critics.

This is all your fault man I not Happy

@T.elegram-TheColetteCherry nobody is buying this crap anymore. GTFO

@@rileytruax766 the Harry Potter movies are very predictable in general. Like in the previous movie they spoil the Moody twist. It's often also fairly easy to predict what happens in movies because many follow basic movie principles. Like if the movie shows or lingers on something, it's almost certain that whatever it is, is important to the plot. People shown to be overly weak as their only character trait turn out to be the bad guy, especially if they pop up often without being central to the plot, like with Quirrel in the first one. If you don't see someone die, then they aren't dead, like Peter Pettigrew and finding only a finger. If you see enough movies these things are easy to pick up on, especially in movies meant for a broad audience.

@@rileytruax766 the Moody twist is spoiled by adding the tongue tic to the character. I never claimed to know what examples your deranged mind has identified as suspect and I simply don't care. The fact that you haven't given any examples yourself makes me think that you don't know either. Why don't you become a member of her Patreon if you're curious about how the full reactions are edited? From the KZfaq edits alone it's clear that she pauses or rewinds her copy.

@@rileytruax766 Your writing is so incoherent I'm beginning to think you're not all there. You're suggesting that it would be difficult to follow a reaction where the reactor pauses the playback. Since this is clearly something she does, I suggest to take a look at her full reactions to see how they're "edited". Almost all video content is "edited" to some degree. Adding an intro is "editing". Syncing up a video with a blurred copy is also "editing". If her Patreons need to follow along with her video, she may have "edited" it in a way that makes it easier. I hope, that by putting relevant words in quotes, you have been able to follow along. The death of Sirius is an (a single) example of basic movie principles of which I covered in my initial comment. I expected you to have more than the one. I see now that trying to explain other similar examples and not specifically breakdown the one you mentioned was an error. I thought you would be able to extrapolate from the examples I gave and provide other more "complex" examples, as you call them, but it seems I'll have to spell it out for you. Sirius shows up often but briefly. The movie obviously has a lot to cover since it is forced to rely on the newspaper scenes and montages to show what is happening. If Sirius was not important to the plot in some way his scenes would have been reduced even more. Sirius is used to lure Harry to the Ministry, so maybe that's the point of him being there, but when he and the others from the order show up, there's obviously still tension in the scene. So some consequence has yet to present itself. It could be a variety of things but the movie focuses on Harry and Sirius fighting side by side and very little on anything else. We have also just established that Sirius is a weak point for Harry. All of these things are strong indicators that something will happen to Sirius, so if you're looking for it the surprise is gone. Could she have been more upset? Perhaps, but she's clearly more analytical in her approach to reactions, so plot twists like Moody and Sirius are clearly less impactful to her than non-plot driven emotional scenes like Harry fighting off Voldemort. Especially since the movies have a tendency to telegraph the plot. Now with that hopefully explained to your satisfaction, I suggest you go find your handler and ask them to bring you your medicine.

@@rileytruax766 Is that Nero the emperor?

@@rileytruax766 demonstrably so