Lol she is a shapeshifter that lives forever she is bound to have sexual histories with alot of people just keep that in mind

Savontre Jarrelle Lmao

Well Mystique does have a son with Wolverine that has both their powers.

+adam wickens well she can turn into anyone you desire or have any body trait that you want in a partner.She could pick out anyone she wanted no problem.

+adam wickens And we love her for it, no regrets or puritanism crap... To bad she won't win any mother of the year award :(

now that is kinky. but there's still weirder stuff on the internet nowadays.

now that is kinky. but there's still weirder stuff on the internet nowadays.

Thank god it didn't happen cause it reminds me too much of a certain porn comic of mystique and spidey... I regret commenting

@@hoodlum4511 why did you remind me of that

@@hoodlum4511 what happened in it?

+Simon Engelholm i think it is just some subconscious innate ability as opposed to photographic memory. i dont think she thinks about it. it just works.

кто этот оборотень ?

But she is *WAY* more iconic

@Dami In the comics she can also change into animals, so Mystique is a better shape shifter considering she can also mimic voices.

@Dami She actually does change into animals. If you read Astonishing Xmen #62 , she morphed into a dog to escape from a restaurant without anyone noticing. She also did transform into a wolf in Xmen Evolution (Not a comic though).

@Dami And yes although the characters you mentioned have shapeshift into more impressive things than Mystique did, Mystique is the complete definition of "Silent but Deadly". She can mimic voices, copy any fingerprint and iris, and has a photographic memory.

Healing is better

Romy Ab you just be a fan of elixir

I love that you added her ex-husband’s name.

Well she is an "anti-hero"....even on the old animated X-Men series, she's constantly switching allegiances between the X-Men and Magneto. :P

lunatiksAlterEgo she's an anti hero.. just like Deadpool

+Triverr She's not an Anti hero, she's a straight up villain. Always has been. Mystque has only helped the X-men for her only personal gain or survival if it's to face off against a bigger threat. Or more commonly just to get closer to Rogue. Mystique would never ever willingly commit an act of good for the sole purpose of doing the right thing and saving lives. And she's betrayed the X-men multiple times after helping them and even killed members of their group. Mystique is one of the most evil Mutants on Earth lol, at least top 10. Far more evil than Magneto. The later films got her character completely in almost every single way.

Super Saiyan Goddess anti heroes do the right thing for the wrong reasons.. does she not fall in that category??? Im confused

Me either!!! Rogue is completely gone...

***** you're right that Mystique is a 3 dimensional character but she is definitely also a sex symbol and a real badass ... the thing is that I have always viewed her as more than just that ... she's very mysterious, misunderstood, opinionated, self-reliant, and in her own way very broken ... the female mutants are always the best ones

Well what bout catniss she's cool right.....except her wining about peta

+lavagamer 23 I dunno how they portrayed her in the books, but Katniss in the movie is just not a good character at all

bloodpondstudios well carnies in the movie is OK for me she just says Peta every 10 seconds though and cries so horribly

+Sean Legghette part of mystiques allure is that she is not upfront about everything. she is a manipulator and has a shady background. shes not the character jlaw portrays. shes at least confident and bad ass which is what we originally got. now they changed her for the worse.

uhm ... yeah... isnt every story ever a sort of soap opera in the end? Even Shakespeare is all about family issues... or Star Wars... or ANYTHING! :D

Hope "soap opera" isn't a slur or insult to you because you look and sound like a fool if you do. Soap operas are amazing so comic books being one is a good thing and a positive.

it's a female from a comic book, they sleep with everybody.

The X-men comics (both good guys and bad guys) have always had the most sluts for some reason. Everyone was always after OPP and I found it a huge and annoying distraction.

do mutants get std's?

@@JunDageki That's not true at all. Most female comic characters DON'T "sleep around with everybody" that's a lie that you made up and told yourself.

That's only in the comics, they didn't include that in the movies

mikesmith145 but you don't know, because like I said at the end of DOFP Mystique saves Logan. Maybe it will happen in Apocalypse?

you don't know either

since she saved him will he still get his metal claws and skeleton back? because since she saved him instead of striker. im pretty sure she wouldnt let them experiment on another mutant.

***** they make a reference to him being quicksilvers dad. after they break magneto out.hes says my mom knew a guy who can control metal, and they give each other a funny look

we she probably did lose mass but it was such a small amount that you wouldn't have notice.

The films are a down grade version of the comic book universe.

jediharold12 Comics tend to be convoluted and filled with too many coincidences in character back stories.

william grace every avid comic book reader feels just like this.

Agreed. .

Definitely!!! She's one of my faves.

no. she's genetically female. I doubt the parts work as a male.

I remembered reading it though,.. O.o

stop watching porn dude :))

Amiel, I said read, not watch,..

You are right, originally that was the case, but they rewrote it later on.

She looks more slick in the comics while she looks rough in the movies. It's how it usually goes

NarutoMonkeyDLuffy01 I just loved the long red hair and white clothing. Plus, she usually carries a huge gun.

+TrueUnderDawgGaming I love the absence of the huge gun. Compensation is never appealing...

+TrueUnderDawgGaming i hate her characterization in the more recent movies, she used to be an interesting and mysterious character but now shes just a little girl almost. i liked thinking that she had this long history and mysterious past.

But mystique wasn't even a major character in the comics

sure.. OF COURSE 👎 JENNIFER GAVE HER MORE DEPH TO THE caracter Rebecca was just a side caracter for the original trilogy so yeah not agreeing

@@penaloza07 It's ok It's your opinion😊 (Sorry for replying If I was late, I just saw this comment and it pisses me off, so I have to do what I have to do.😄)

Though it wasn't very lore friendly it sure was a kick ass X-men movie nonetheless!

***** if you mean lots of CGI for power display the yes but that's it :/

KaosKrusher First Class was a very well made film.

***** seems we don't have the same definition of "very well made" ;) the film as a stand-alone for people not previously familiar with Marvel is ok but that's all in my opinion

***** why people keep (mis)interpreting? I never said it was a "bad" movie but I wouldn't say "good" either (and that has NOTHING to do with "fanboy" ...) it's an ok movie, certainly watchable and for sure has good CGI for power displays/action (and a great Wolverine cameo ^_^ (NOW I'm fanboying)) I surely don't expect a movie to be faithful to comics (besides, to what comics? they retcon so much ...) but the characters have no background whatsoever ... except for Magneto but his background was already known (it's just more developped in here) and the movie has close to no connection to the trilogy (except for Xavier, Magneto and Mystique) plus it's retconning the trilogy in several ways (if I remember correctly)

you. are correct.

There is a rumor that she may actually be a he or whatever since she cab shapeshift.

but shes given birth..?

mystique often switches her gender/sex for different life styles so her being transgender is not shocking or a big deal. She has the ability to change her body to her preference/ adaption

Yeah, I was like "what?" I thought I heard wrong when she got together with Destiny. I remember seeing her in I believe x-men evolution when they showed Destiny make a prophecy about Rogue. I wouldn't have guessed they were lovers. I thought they were friends. But I never knew their background story or why Mystique was with her.

***** i am tapping that, and i do know it

She Wants The D!!!!

I'm not sure if you've noticed but your > is pointing the wrong way

SpookySpooks Oh there's no mistake there alright. Rebecca Romijn > Jennifer Lawrence

Resident Reveler 100% agreed

Jennifer lawrence

Romjn old Mystique Lawrence young Mystique

They did.

+Jairo Ambrósio They are virtually equal. literally equal. Romjin gets a little nod because she was the first, but they are both smoking hot.

+Jairo Ambrósio The thumbs up show you're right. Lawrence is just more popular.

+Trevor Cormier Exactly...

Jairo Ambrósio Romijin looks more like mystique. Halle berry was chosen for popularity as well. She is too short and petite to play Storm.

+GoDokuNoDAN I feel Romijn does a good job with portraying the character as the badass Mystique is in the comics, whereas Lawrence falls short of doing so... whether that's the fault of the writers or her acting I do not know.

***** yeah sure....

Oh, you should see what he's like in the comics. If you thought he was hardcore in the movie he is B.A. to the 50th degree in the comics.

no...

real big player in the New Mutants line

hes like the most important person of the series.

Elyxr Azazel is a beast

Heck yeah! was that to subtle? But yeah in all seriousness though, yes.

***** I understand what you're getting at, but there is just no legitimate argument one can make arguing in the favor of movies not following the comics to the letter. This is my argument: If you're making a comic book movie because of the huge or significant following of a comic, rewriting either the story's premise or characters would ultimately leave fans disappointed. And, since the primary goal was only to make money off of the idea and not to bring the stories to life, I believe it's fair to say that movies are just an exploitation of the comics. Let me be clear though, I'm not saying people can't do that, and I say this for two reasons. One, they have already done this, and two, we live in a country that runs capitalism, and in a capitalist country, exploitation is the name of the game. Again, I'm not saying they can't, I just prefer they didn't, and I'm not the only one who thinks this way. Apparently, there are so many of us they have given us a name, purist.

***** I get what you're getting at, but I don't think you thought this through. Remember, the movie was only made because of the fanboy and fangirl base. Remember, we live in a capitalist society. So that means we don't waste when it comes to the business side of economics. When talk of a movie came up, one of the first things they looked at is a budget. This means projected numbers, in other words, how much can we spend on making the movie and how much will we make in profits. They were thinking revenue-expenses=profits. The healthy bulk of revenue came from Fanboys and fangirls. They know these are the people who will go or are at least expected to go see the movie, without them production of the movie will not happen. It's simply not enough interest in the project, which they see as not enough of a money making project. This is why I say they should cater to fanboys and fangirls (of the comics books in this case). Short version, you go where the money is.

***** (Please do not read this with a condescending tone. I did not write with malice in mind.) Again, that's not the reason 20th century fox "down played" the costumes for the x-men movie. They simply didn't want to spend the extra money to customize the different suits. During an interview they actually said those words. Again, it came down to revenue - expenses = profits. They may have felt that it would be tacky, but then again a group of super-powered adults calling themselves the x-men was not tacky? I mean, names like storm, cyclops, Toad, saber-tooth, mystique, and magneto seem like perfectly good names to me (Sarcasm) lol. Don't forget all the weirdness that goes with that, like mystique being completely blue, and saber-tooth (at least in the movie) not being able to grasp the elusive English language, seeing as the only time he spoke was when Charles took control of his mind. You have your opinion and you're entitled to it, but in this case, your opinion about wolverine's costume being tacky is in the minority, for the majority of comic book readers, it would have come across as normal because they would have been use to seeing it in the comics. Remember, the target audience for the movie were the comic book fans. This means the majority of the movie goers would have actually preferred it to be yellow and blue. Now don't misunderstand me. Yes, the yellow and blue costume is odd, but in context it would have been preferred. To give you perspective on your argument about tacky looking, the equivalent would be if you were in charge of the harry potter movies. Let's say you decided, "you know what, I'm not going to have magic in this movie, I'm going to have it all explained through science. I'm going to do it this way because otherwise it would look... tacky." In others words, no flying brooms.

***** You seem to be confused. 20th century fox actually said they didn't do the different costumes because it was cheaper to do one color. Those are not my words, it was theirs. You also misunderstand target audience and the average movie audience. Of course they want everyone to go see it, but as a movie designer you have to ball park your estimates. To do a semi-accuracy estimate you need a target group to go with. example: If you're a business man and you're handing out business cards you probably don't hand them out to people 14 years old and younger. Not because you don't want them to know about your company, but because they are typically to young to invest or work for your company, so if the population is 100 people and for easy math 40 are under the age of 14, and let's say that's the only people you have excluded, then you should have at least 65 to 70 cards on you and no more each day. You want to keep the waste to a minimum. You don't want so many that you cut profits, but you don't want to have so little that you can't provide the cards to someone who wants one. For the x-men movie they did this, but focused on a target group, as discounting who wouldn't come would have simply been to many to exclude, so you focus on who would, with a reasonable margin for error. (I.E. Comic book fans) They are already familiar with the content so we don't have to go into every little detail for the character to be dynamic, we simply have to gloss over it because the character is already larger than life for this group of fans. You say the rules are different for superheroes versus harry potter or star wars type films. But why do you say that? For the majority of people who are not fans of these types of movies they are classified in the same group. Only the fans of these movies find and establish a difference in believe-ability.

Ok this is going to be pregnancy protects the child and what happens with her particular mutation. Its just gonna be to theoretical to have a solid idea about how it works. And who is to say that he didn't shape shift with her, and until a certain point, which is why he looks like this. The last shape shift he went through before his body started rejecting it.

Comic book logic

Mystique is able to move her organs when she shape shifts, it's not just skin deep.

Indigo Julze because it's fiction :P

+JonnyJuke i hope so

+JonnyJuke I hope so too. It makes more sense for her to always be a villian in the X-Men universe. I personally find her super creepy, but Jennifer Lawrence's portrayal of Mystique has ruined that for me.

***** i feel like charles would have picked up on it telepathically though

+dan tan In the original comics, most likely, but in "X-Men: First Order," he was still learning what he could do with his powers and what his weaknesses were, and he was just beginning to discover who he can or cannot trust.

+belongtotoday He also simply promised not to.

?

i thought Mystique fuck Sabertooth then i thought she just fuck some rich guy and out come's Nightcrawler.....

whats confusing mystiqe and azazel fucked and out came nightcrawler

So...that means...uhh...

SonicFCLegends Mystique + Azazel = Nightcrawler So he got Mystiques skin color and Azazel's powers.

Oh...wow interesting...

no, they explained how the continuity changed in the movies, smart ass

Then a devil child who prays to god and protects humanity; and a godchild who doesn't believe in god and feels nothing for life at all; will collide.

like Civil War was "Accurate" plz

Cinematic universes are not canon to the comics

Some may call this junk me I call them treasure Thanks you, I got some guy on the Sentinels Origins, clamming that all the FOX movies are canon...I really think he's just trolling.

Well the original trilogy isn't even considered canon anymore.

True...

But wasn't destiny supposed to be rogues mum but they changed it because the publishers wouldn't except mystique and destinies relationship at the time?

+Thomas Doherty True, that was supposed to have happened. But instead we got hippy parents and an abusive aunt. After all, this is only a theory that I think would be cool if they used. Also losing his daughter would explain why Logan always shows a paternal side when dealing with the majority of X-Women, like Jubilee, Kitty or X-23.

+Dunne N' dusted No.

+AnTra23 Pardon? Do you mean I am wrong for thinking that, or the idea is ridiculous?

Dunne N' dusted Both.

she also wears black

Spoderman lmao

+George Pajeejo Ha

lmao

She actually got the hunger games because of X-men. She was in X-men before she was in the hunger games

Hunter Miller Oh cool but she's a good actress but not a complete fit for the role though Rebecca was more dark you know.

Ann Boylen Yea I agree. I like her as Mystique but She's nothing compared to Rebecca

Hunter Miller Yeah Becca was just so badass as Mystique and even though I'm gay I found her sexier too.

Ann Boylen The thing I really liked with her portrayal of Mystique is that they make it obvious that she's still growing, and learning how to imitate people properly. I thought DOFP showed quite well when she impersonated Trask, that Mystique made mistakes now and then, and did things the person she is impersonating would never do (such as asking about the secretaries scarf) Or how she chose the most noticeable person in the crowd to become when escaping from Magneto. It was just a nice way of showing yes she has awesome powers but she's still learning how to imitate other people. Where In the original trilogy she had it down, and could imitate anyone perfectly without the slightest flaw or tell, but she was a lot older than this version. So I like that they are showing a believable amount of growth in her abilities between the two films and I hope in the final one she has got it right.

They did.

I have never cared for the character either.

That's probably because in the movies she was basically stripped down to the "sexy, 1 dimensional" female evil side kick

The scales make her look unattractive. They should have just stuck to her traditional look.

+brandon tanner azazel is also a mutant with teleportation abilities same as nightcrawler's. they also look the same except the skin, azazel has red skin. he's in xmen first class :)

I know right i hate how he Says that name

+katty dinson You're not very bright, are you?

i agree with you. So disappointed 😬

lol but then her acting was one of the most praised things in First Class and DOFP.

not feathers... scales

thisis675 And here I thought I was the only one who hated her