Top 10 Close-In Weapon Systems In The World

Top 10 Close-In Weapon Systems In The World | Top CIWS Weapons

Рет қаралды 601,150

Күн бұрын

There are two types of CIWS systems. A gun-based CIWS usually consists of a combination of radars, computers, and rapid-firing multiple-barrel rotary cannons placed on a rotating turret. Missile-based CIWSs use either infra-red, passive radar/ESM, or semi-active radar terminal guidance to guide missiles to the targeted enemy aircraft or other threats. In some cases, CIWS are used on land to protect military bases. In this case, the CIWS can also protect the base from shell and rocket fire. A gun-based CIWS usually consists of a combination of radars, computers and rotary or revolver cannon placed on a rotating, automatically aimed gun mount. Examples of gun-based CIWS products in operation are:
Credits:
Rheinmetall:
shorturl.at/psP27
Denel:
shorturl.at/hjryT
Meroka:
bit.ly/3ciK33N
Sea Zenith:
bit.ly/3cmUUtM
Goalkeeper:
bit.ly/3uRjKIJ
Phalanx:
bit.ly/3cmjdI2
Type 730:
bit.ly/3gfpVkw
Kashtan:
bit.ly/3prhl6b
Pantsir-M:
bit.ly/3imwB34
The Buzz does not own the rights to these pictures or video clips, and no copyright infringement is intended. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images/clips to be credited/removed, or in case we miss out on mentioning your content in the description please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com.

Пікірлер: 974

@hellboystein2926 3 жыл бұрын

Pure rate of fire, is not a sufficient criteria: the Rheinmetall has 35mm with fragmenting Tungsteen sub-projectiles.

@Eradicator-jv9xr 3 жыл бұрын

Yes ik

@Eradicator-jv9xr 3 жыл бұрын

But that's for anti air you'll rely have to hook it up to a ciws radar and targeting system to actually use it to shoot down missiles n stuff

@kwtr1609 2 жыл бұрын

@@Eradicator-jv9xr No, its an CIWS and CRAM system. It alreday has laser range systems and IR sensors. And of course, it needs a radar, basically every ship needs a radar

@kwtr1609 2 жыл бұрын

And where is RAM and SeaRAM?

@Justineexy 2 жыл бұрын

Pure Fire rate is the Last line of defense for the CIWS. The Kashten and Pantsir Rely on their Missiles for Interception, But they rely on their Pure fire rate guns for the final stand, In other words, The ship relies on the CIWS as a final lien of defense, The CIWS it self relies on it's guns for the final lien of defense.

@MFitz12 3 жыл бұрын

I love these lists made by people who don't have a clue what they are on about. A CIWS system is not just a gun or gun mount. It is an integrated combination of weapon system, target acquisition and tracking system and fire control system. This video ignores two of the three. Then on top of that a system like Sea Zenith makes the list which is an acknowledged failure. Just a waste of time.

@ivanlagrossemoule 3 жыл бұрын

At the same time people loving comparing 'spreadsheet' values of weapons and argue over them. If we didn't have this garbage content someone else would fill the gap.

@user-ox3bp4rz3n 2 жыл бұрын

"A CIWS system is not just a gun or gun mount. It is an integrated combination of weapon system, target acquisition and tracking system and fire control system. " - let's say. But do you know any other systems from the list? For example, the presented Russian weapons systems? I did not go into the details of these systems, but I can give you an example of how our S-400 missile defense systems work (the best in the world, by the way, not counting the latest S-500 complex): S-300, S-400 have automatic interception modes, without the actions of maintenance personnel, and this is the main their mode. At the same time, any S-400 complex can not only shoot at other people's commands, but also manage a network of Anti-aircraft Missile Systems of various types: S-400, S-300, Pantsir-S1, Tor - M1, combining dozens of launchers with hundreds of missiles under its command. In this connection, I think that these systems are also part of a single network.

@jarink1 2 жыл бұрын

@@user-ox3bp4rz3n Nikolai, thanks for a perfect example of a straw man argument. Russian long range SAMs are great, so Russian CIWS must be the best also?

@user-ox3bp4rz3n 2 жыл бұрын

@@jarink1 First of all, you probably don't read well. I wrote there that our S-400 systems had the ability to control many other systems in an automated format. And this has been implemented for a long time. And when I wrote that our systems are the best, I wrote specifically about the S-300.. S-400 systems and so on. And not about CIWS systems. About CIWS systems, I said that in order to fully compare, you need to know their characteristics. And who is now a great example of a straw man here, me or you?

@jarink1 2 жыл бұрын

@@user-ox3bp4rz3n Nick, you need to research what a "Straw man" argument is. до свидания

@_556ms 2 жыл бұрын

1st: fire rate is not a proper category the rheinmetall cannon is much more effective against aircraft and larger missiles 2nd: the rheinmetall cannon is the mantis and comes from germany

@1JackTorS 3 жыл бұрын

You list everything in each gun's description except the caliber. I guess proofreading is a skill of the past.

@Qronos16 3 жыл бұрын

This video is incorrect on the listings

@Alexandre-ur7qb 3 жыл бұрын

mostly 20mm

@user-rm1bf4pp2g 3 жыл бұрын

Russians use only 30mm with several types of ammunition thats all i know.

@tw4982 3 жыл бұрын

Maybe the volume was turned down; my playback showed calibers in the sub-titles. Maybe not written, but it was described..

@alexanderbutler2989 2 жыл бұрын

yes I noticed that...I guess we're supposed to memorize it

@SunriseLAW 3 жыл бұрын

So many close-in weapon systems to choose from. Question is, what does my neighbor have?

@santochele1993 3 жыл бұрын

😄😄

@rupayanbandyopadhyay3578 3 жыл бұрын

Obviously one of the Chinese made one.

@caliman8006 3 жыл бұрын

A "mini-pee-pee" close-in gun.

@AS-br8si 2 жыл бұрын

But where u from?

@APersonOnYouTubeX 2 жыл бұрын

@@rupayanbandyopadhyay3578 nah China just sucks at actually choosing todo targets to test weapons on, honestly prob a nail gun

@gailmrutland6508 3 жыл бұрын

*Rate of fire is one metric, and has several subcategories such as initial rate, sustained rate , burst rate and total magazine quantity. What matters is target acquisition, time on target and success rates of defeat, and YOUR order on "best"r would change dramatically measured by those meaningful metrics.*

@MrCastodian 2 жыл бұрын

No, you THINK that, not the same as its correct.

@gtifighter 2 жыл бұрын

no, it wouldn't. Go cry because your Phalanx CWIS isn't the #1 on this planet...

@gen2mediainc.577 2 жыл бұрын

@@gtifighter yeah millennium gun is way cooler anyways

@huhummmmmmm 2 жыл бұрын

@@MrCastodian Of course it was correct, it's simple logic. Grow up.

@FahrurRoziqin 2 жыл бұрын

@@gen2mediainc.577 Good design, i like it

@XkMeng Ай бұрын

China's latest 1130b model should be at the top of the list. It is the only ciws system in the world with an independent AESA radar.

@LaidbackLost 2 жыл бұрын

Congratulations on winning the award for poorest aged KZfaq video of 2022 April!

@Hamilton_ZA 3 жыл бұрын

South Africa we made it. 🇿🇦 🇿🇦 🇿🇦

@svmafs6401 3 жыл бұрын

@Burak gö not everything is black or white..please check before speculating..

@Hamilton_ZA 3 жыл бұрын

Paid with my income tax money, sin tax money, fuel levy tax, VAT. MY MONEY MADE IT.

@svmafs6401 3 жыл бұрын

@@Hamilton_ZA Unfortunately i cant argue with you on that one...our government is such

@mustafakemalataturk8013 3 жыл бұрын

Greetings from turkey

@iam3336 3 жыл бұрын

@Burak gö said by beggar country like yours.

@timesof44 2 жыл бұрын

Goalkeeper takes no prisoners, shoots first and doesn't ask any questions after. The top 2 look like something a Transformer would turn into.

@Austin-cx2xe 3 ай бұрын

The goalkeeper has no actual combat experience. Phalanx is not only the OG but easily the most combat approved and trusted CIWS with it just recently destroying Houthi anti ship missiles as a way to save missiles and money.

@eagol 24 күн бұрын

Note that the latest sea test of the Chinese PLAN 003 aircraft carrier in early May 2024, the 1130 CIWS system came with a rectangular AESA radar antenna (old models are disc shape), can track and trace multi-targets and prioritize them at the same time.

@juho1057 2 жыл бұрын

There WAS six AK-630 onboard russian cruiser Moskva... It got hit TWICE and those systems could not do anything!

@NewMusicWeekly 2 жыл бұрын

We may never learn if all six AK-630s failed to activate, some activated but failed to destroy the incoming missile, or were all busy engaging drones.

@razorm1195 2 жыл бұрын

Self claimed ukrainian

@jtrx753 2 жыл бұрын

@@razorm1195 Self claimed expert keyboard warrior

@garrenali3301 2 жыл бұрын

Mmmmmmm maybe its jammed so it cant firing the missile

@sovietunion9131 Жыл бұрын

I think Western Propogenda hadn't told you Ukraine launched almost 20-25 neptune missiles to destroy Moskva Cruiser AK-630 Destroyed 3-5 Neptune Missiles S-300 destroyed more than 15 neptune missiles Only 2 missiles had passed AA system, One missile done some miner damage but second missile hit the ammunition area where P-1000 were stored.

@VahapOKUTAN. 3 жыл бұрын

Turkey produced a new system called Gökdeniz. Gökdeniz may be at the top of the list because it has smart projectile launching capability, excellent software and powerful radars.

@annoyingbstard9407 3 жыл бұрын

😂

@tsugumorihoney2288 3 жыл бұрын

this top based on CIWS "RATE OF FIRE" pls listen what author telling before typing something stupid

@muratyz6607 2 жыл бұрын

@@tsugumorihoney2288 atış hızı tek başına hiçbirşey değildir..daha büyük kalibre daha fazla kinetik güç demektir..yazar listeyi yaparken en hızlıyı değil ..en iyi sistemleri göz önüne almalıydı..

@mr.t993 10 ай бұрын

Döner?

@Putins-mustache 3 жыл бұрын

Сorrection : "Duet" double rate of fire АК-630М-2 = 10 000 with two AO-18KD rotary cannons. Visually "Duet" differs from "Roy" in having a new mount with a stealthy low RCS design compared with the more traditional rounded AK-630 mounts.

@user-tr4bk6js4q 2 жыл бұрын

хороший резак у китайцев тоже супер

@hasnitamatisa6132 2 жыл бұрын

How many ammo it had?

@Putins-mustache 2 жыл бұрын

@@hasnitamatisa6132 4000 6 bursts of 400 shots with breaks of 5-6 or 200 shots with breaks of 1-1.5 seconds (information for one gun)

@hasnitamatisa6132 2 жыл бұрын

Hopefully can it can hit target with eased. Loading another 4K ammo may take some time and seriuos labour.

@dodgex6592 3 жыл бұрын

There is useless info about length and weight, but no info about caliber that more important

@Tuglife912 3 жыл бұрын

Most are 30mm and our Mk.15 Phalanx is 20mm

@cgi2002 2 жыл бұрын

Weight is important, some of these systems are too heavy to be fitted to lighter ships, and some aren't the complete system, just the "gun" unit, they rely on a ship having an active search radar installed that they can be linked to. Some are also only part of the CIWS, many have a second missile based component thats installed seperately from the gun (or entirely independantly for both parts). A good example is the Phylanx is only part of the US CIWS, there is the C-RAM system too thats installed alongside it on many ships to act as the longer range compnent of the CIWS. Length (and height) while sounding useless, also is important, they affect the weapon placement aboard ship. If its too long it can't be installed in certain places as the barrels may collide with the ships structure, height means they can't be installed in certain places without disrutping the ships radar/communications or in heavier systems the ships stability. They sound like stupid stats but they really aren't. Also calibre was listed when you listen to the video, just not on the stats that were printed, bit of an oversight admittedly.

@mc-foxy 3 жыл бұрын

The Oerlikon Millennium Gun or „MANTIS“ is from Germany, not swiss. Its from Rheinmetall Defense, a german Company.

@khushaljaiswal0002 3 жыл бұрын

It's a licensed production of Swiss gun

@Lofwyrf 3 жыл бұрын

Oerlikon was bought by Rheinmetall in 1999 so it's not licensed nor is it not a Swiss Company Now it is Rheinmetall Air Defence AG Part of Rheinmetall German. Rheinmetall Air Defence AG Birchstrasse 155 8050 Zürich Schweiz So a Swiss Company belonging to a German company

@rex_5553 3 жыл бұрын

The Oerlilkon is mounted also on PT boats.

@mofleh177 3 жыл бұрын

@@khushaljaiswal0002 Ironically the original Oerlikon designer was German but had to register the patent and start the company in Switzerland because the 1919 armistice after WW1 forbids Germany from making such weapons.

@Braun30 3 жыл бұрын

It was designed in Switzerland and is built in Switzerland. Belonging to a entity which happens to be abroad doesn't give the nationality. Otherwise we should talk about Lamborgini, that great German car, just like Rolls Royce, same origin.

@Braun30 3 жыл бұрын

Drawings seemed like a selection of new Daleks for Dr. Who.

@CoCoNutShovel Жыл бұрын

That scene from Hunter Killer will forever be implanted in my mind

@1zanglang 3 жыл бұрын

Rating these weapons only by rate of fire is just stupid.

@andr3onn854 3 жыл бұрын

Ikr

@danielbromwich1827 3 жыл бұрын

Also using the listed effective range values is pointless. Russia for example always has much lower standards for what constitutes "effective range". the 30×165mm rounds used in their listed CIWS have a lower muzzle velocity and worse ballistic coefficient than the 30×173mm round used in the Goalkeeper, yet they state their effective range as 4000m compared to Goalkeepers 2500m.

@1zanglang 3 жыл бұрын

@@danielbromwich1827 Absolutely correct.

@Eradicator-jv9xr 3 жыл бұрын

@@danielbromwich1827 she's probably too lazy to calculate those herself

@adrianpovazan3183 3 жыл бұрын

Yes but Russia would be also on the top.

@williamang9649 3 жыл бұрын

Right timing, couldn't be better then now to be recommended to watch 👍😋.

@yournemesis2454 3 жыл бұрын

I hope we get the pantasir m in our next gen frigates and destroyers like p18

@supermom7407 3 жыл бұрын

AK 630 so cute but deadly

@briananthony4044 3 жыл бұрын

It is a really light turret, no wonder Russian ships are covered in them.

@Ivan0vsky 3 жыл бұрын

Дуэт more efficiently. Duet is super!

@briananthony4044 3 жыл бұрын

@@Ivan0vsky Yes I have seen that one. Nice compact unit. 10,000 rpm

@Justineexy 2 жыл бұрын

@@briananthony4044 Why not add more if you can! Russian navy doctrine (Just a joke)

@DreadX10 3 ай бұрын

My boarding team was firing 170 rounds per second during a mad-minute (the fastest way to get all the ammo out of the magazines after deployment). According to you, this was the best CIWS ever......

@lupodimontenero661 3 жыл бұрын

and Breda, OTO Melara, Leonardo? and anyway, I agree with 1zanglang, Helboy Stein, Player 55 Redcrafter. A CIWS has an acquisition system and a fire control system which is the most important part of the CIWS system followed by the ammunition, the gun itself only comes in 3rd place. the Leonardo 76/62 Super Rapido, for example, can use, in anti-missile mode of short / very short range ships, the DART projectiles, a guided ammunition and therefore to correct the route even in flight by directing it to the target, they are non-calibrated projectiles with respect to to the cannon, which can correct their trajectory to counter the maneuvers of the target missile and intercept it. Furthermore, in the 30 - 40 mm class, the Breda Dardo with a maximum range of 12500 m can engage flying targets at a longer USEFUL distance than any existing pariclass. useful distance = maximum range minus 25 - 30%

@nhatpham2206 Жыл бұрын

OTO Melara is a vulcan canon

@epicjager2899 9 ай бұрын

@@nhatpham2206 have you ever seen a 76mm vulcan? cuz i didn't

@mayofficialsnhangthu7084 3 жыл бұрын

Love Russia from Laos 🇱🇦 ❤️🇷🇺

@AAdB72 3 жыл бұрын

Spanish CIWS Meroka is the old one. Escribano has developed for the Spanish Navy (Armada) the Sentinel TAO (GAU 12/U gun + 4 Mistral III missiles) and the Sentinel 25 RFG (only GAU 12/U gun) It will be great if you update de TOP 10 CIWS with the new weapons

@pacojones4074 3 жыл бұрын

Ni yo lo hubiera dicho mejor 😉😁

@AAdB72 3 жыл бұрын

@@pacojones4074 de hecho si podrías jajaja Luego me fijé que la versión inicial llevará el cañón rotatorio tipo GAU-12/U con 5 tubos pero está previsto mejorarla pasando al modelo GAU-22/A y reduciendo a 4 tubos.

@pacojones4074 3 жыл бұрын

@@AAdB72 créeme, ni aun así yo lo hubiera hecho mejor 😉😅

@FahrurRoziqin 2 жыл бұрын

AK-630 look very simple and just 1m short for that rank tbh but its effective Also i like the design of millenum Gun

@ivannegrozni7692 2 жыл бұрын

AK-630m-2 Duet google it

@richier8898 Жыл бұрын

So effective that Moskva sunk...

@franciscoavila7730 2 жыл бұрын

The Meroka system was decommissioned many years ago, it was never updated or functional in reality, only on paper, currently it is only "dead weight" in the war ships that it was installed.

@peterpain6625 Жыл бұрын

Same as the chinese and russian paper guns i suppose :)

@josuea1911 Жыл бұрын

@@peterpain6625 cope much ?

@NeelMarathe-wx1iq 11 ай бұрын

@@josuea1911No, kind of correct actually. Maintenance standards are horrible.

@texasranger24 2 жыл бұрын

This list is incredibly misleading. Some of these systems were already outdated 30 years ago, while the Nr 10 Millennium Gun has individually programmed explosive ammo, the newest radar and computers and the highest range. Leading to the best hits per shots fired ratio. Only lasers or even more advanced future guns will be better.

@williamdossantos369 2 жыл бұрын

Rússia🇷🇺 com 3 dos 10 sistemas anti aéreo, parabéns Russia por sua inovação, Brasil🇧🇷 minha terra amada, um dia chegamos lá

@usuariopimba707 2 жыл бұрын

Na real seria 4, porque os russos também tem o AK630 M1-2.

@AlexAlex-jz4eo Жыл бұрын

Russia in real life not even in the list 😂😂 Moskva is now down with the fishes🤣🤣

@ETC_Rohaly_USCG Ай бұрын

I'm retired now, but the sea whiz that we had was dang impressive.

@taddyllaneta4466 3 жыл бұрын

Lol. The top gun should be the Russian Duet CIWS

@player55redcrafter8 3 жыл бұрын

You didn't add the DARDO ciws, I'm pretty much a fan of large caliber ciws like the 40mm

@praetor9822 2 жыл бұрын

I am Heavy Weapons Guy. And this is my weapon.

@daknytt 2 жыл бұрын

Proud of Mzansi🇿🇦 for making it on the top 10👊

@notthelastman9107 2 жыл бұрын

Mzansi.....

@royhsieh4307 3 жыл бұрын

imagine similar systems introduced in ww2: kamikazers: we quit

@racismceo797 2 жыл бұрын

they had pretty good AA back then tho

@Deimnos 2 жыл бұрын

well if you wanna see something like that animated, but it is agaisnt a US Navy attack flight in WW2, you can check it out here, but it doesnt have subtitles. It isnt realistic, but it gives you the Basic Idea (and it doesn't just involve the CIWS system): kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ab-dfspnlrCpoX0.html

@nikialexa5654 2 жыл бұрын

*TOP 10 RATE OF FIRE CIWS IN THE WORLD* There i fix the title..

@dylanlim7647 3 жыл бұрын

Even so, for everyone mad that its by rate of fire, You have to admit that the PANTSIR M is scary

@turkishcypriot8013 3 жыл бұрын

Pantsir easy target for Turkish drone Bayraktar TB-2 watch the videos.

@Ivan0vsky 3 жыл бұрын

@@turkishcypriot8013 Old Pantsyr S-1, no one S-2 or a SM or M

@acemipenguen7318 2 жыл бұрын

@@Ivan0vsky old or new bom bom bom.

@Ivan0vsky 2 жыл бұрын

@@acemipenguen7318 only in your dreams

@cgi2002 2 жыл бұрын

@@turkishcypriot8013 you mean the video which when you actually watch it shows that active S-1's killed upwards of 40 Bayraktars without loss later on, and the early losses to those drones were against S-1's that weren't active at the time. Before you boast about your drones effectiveness, make sure your drones actually engaging targets that are setup to shoot back, because when it does, it loses, badly.

@Kalle56 2 жыл бұрын

if the hoseir m is as prone to errors as the hoseir s2, then you have a problem. I know one is a ground-based air defense system and the other is a close-in weapon system, anyway

@jamison884 2 жыл бұрын

The weapons systems are arranged by rate of fire, and even then, the US/NATO Phalanx comes in 4th on this list. Only Russian and Chinese designs ahead of it. I'll just go ahead and take that US option, you other guys can have the Russian and Chinese models.

@doneckford1189 3 жыл бұрын

The AK-630 reminds me of a Dalek

@swapnilkadam8094 3 жыл бұрын

Awesome video, nice information, Love from Mumbai as well as Thane, India!!

@spark300c Күн бұрын

it not just rate of fire but effective range effectiveness against supersonic missiles. more range means that system is more effective with high rate of fire.

@Krypton1996 3 жыл бұрын

Please make a video about Top 10 RCWS.

@rex_5553 3 жыл бұрын

In the thumbnail & Timestamp 4:46 the Top 4 is the iconic US Model CWIS Phalanx Minigun, seen on all destroyer-type ships.

@sarahbethsmile 2 жыл бұрын

What happens when we get the kashtan ciws and put it on tracks? Bam,we got the Tunguska anti everything

@xmeda 2 жыл бұрын

Too large, heavy and recoil is too much for such small vehicle.

@profo4544 2 жыл бұрын

@@xmeda Recoil? compared to a tank on tracks? what are u talking about lmao those missiles and guns arent putting out that much recoil lmfao.

@gourmetbanana 2 жыл бұрын

Except against Turkish drones...

@engineer0831 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for video ))

@ThorDyrden Ай бұрын

Simply choosing rate of fire as sole metric is not sufficient (as most comments point out). Like kids comparing cars solely based on horsepower. One aspect missed e.g. is: These canons fire short bursts of maybe 1s. The rotary canons usually have a higher rate of fire - but they need time to start rotation, before they fire. So if you loose 500ms of the 1s burst - this meens a weapons-system firing from ms 1 can have half the fire-rate and still put out the same amount of rounds... and it has a lower latency.

@akashnepak504 2 жыл бұрын

Goalkeeper has better tracking capability than phalinx

@randykitchleburger2780 2 жыл бұрын

I wouldn't doubt it to be an honest 🇺🇸

@profo4544 2 жыл бұрын

Larger caliber size to, but its made off of the design of the phalanx, if u think the phalanx the US employs doesnt use some improved tech ur naive, i hear the phalanx is very twitchy, seems soulless, it can move extremely fast. The the phalanx im sure has some classified tech in it, the ones we employ atleast, maybe not the ones we export.

@pieterveenders9793 Жыл бұрын

@@profo4544 Incorrect, Goalkeeper has no relation with Phalanx. The Dutch designed it from the ground up with the exception of buying its gun from GE to save money on cost of scale (the Netherlands has no manufacturers producing multi-barrelled autocannons, and setting that up themselves would cause a huge increase in the per unit costs, hence it was cheaper to just buy that abroad). And the Dutch have always been ahead of the US by 5-10 years when it comes to naval sensors such as radar. Precisely those sensors are the reason why Goalkeeper is so much better, it has unparallelled accuracy as a result.

@jimmys1558 7 ай бұрын

@@pieterveenders9793 We bought the gun from USA, made rest ourselves. i believe its the same gun thats fitted on an A-10

@user-ji7qy2vc8x 3 ай бұрын

I agree. Goalkeeper is the best!

@user-ck2ei7xh3e 3 жыл бұрын

"Дуэт" где???

@fresconle7939 2 жыл бұрын

В мультиках

@joshuas640 2 жыл бұрын

What do you edit on ?

@Masterbaade 2 ай бұрын

Let’s rate them only on rate of fire. Lol

@TD_JR 2 жыл бұрын

I'd think accuracy and tracking are ahead of ROF in terms of purpose.

@sonson9876 2 жыл бұрын

If you spit double the rounds a minute accuracy gets a bit meaningless.. And if you wanna go by accuracy, the Millenium gun would be top 5 just because of the type of ammo it uses

@narobii9815 2 жыл бұрын

It's also a lot harder to get good numbers on accuracy and tracking for a simple youtube video. Hence why they stated this is how we will rank them, not this is the best ranking. It's used to give order. One could argue size or weight should play a bigger role.

@samulivainionpaa9338 2 жыл бұрын

@@sonson9876 Well, Moskva went down to subsonic ASM's, so it appears so that accuracy and tracking matter more

@jacobt6412 2 жыл бұрын

You would think the Phalanx would be in the top 2 because of its proven record but instead unproven weapon systems get the top 3. Very strange.

@jacobt6412 2 жыл бұрын

@@RobertLutece909 Yeah you right, my bad.

@profo4544 2 жыл бұрын

From what i hear it moves the fastest and its impressively twitchy and responsive nowadays, the footage of alot of the ones u see are from when they first came out, These things used to be famous for not working at all on shipsn when they first were employed, now they much more reliable.

@jacobt6412 2 жыл бұрын

@@profo4544 They're employed in US bases as well because they're quite good at their job against artillery and other projectiles. The US Army loves them.

@pieterveenders9793 Жыл бұрын

The list is clearly incorrect anyway, considering Goalkeeper is much better than Phalanx and yet somehow Phalanx ranks right above it.

@robertwillis4061 2 жыл бұрын

And the UK has nothing you would think with BAE systems being into so many different pieces of Military equipment, they would have something in this field.

@jameswaterfield 2 ай бұрын

Recent history, disproves #6, #2 and #1

@rollerrollerichson6258 3 жыл бұрын

Sea Zenith was developed from Oerlikon Contraves, Swiss. Its not a Turkish gun but it is used on old Turkish frigates from Germany like TCG Oruc Reis.

@zamazingotv2149 3 жыл бұрын

Who say this?

@rollerrollerichson6258 3 жыл бұрын

@@zamazingotv2149 What do you mean? The company is from swiss (today, Rheinmetall) and they developed this product. There are all infos, do your research.

@zamazingotv2149 3 жыл бұрын

@@rollerrollerichson6258 just motor from germany rein metal but all guns from self turkey

@zamazingotv2149 3 жыл бұрын

@@rollerrollerichson6258 and now turkey dont need tank motor from germany because turkey do it to 1600 ps a motor from bmc company

@rollerrollerichson6258 3 жыл бұрын

@@zamazingotv2149 You do not need a tank engine for a CIWS. I just say, this is not a Turkish made weapon system, it is from a swiss company, used on Turkish ships they bought from Germany. The Turkish made Gökdeniz CIWS also uses an Oerlikon Gun, produced under license. Now, Oerlikon is part of a German subcompany from Getmanys Rheinmetall, also located in Swiss. By the way, if the BMC tank engine will fulfill the needs as a reliable engine will need time, as well as the powerpack.

@renato3177 2 жыл бұрын

This list is incorrect. Missing the 76mm OTO Melara Super Rapido used by almost all western navies.

@wellerocks 2 жыл бұрын

and the Bofors 57mm. This youtuber just read a list on fastest firing guns, and assumed that's how you reliably take down targets.

@satyajeetbhosale7134 Жыл бұрын

It's not ciws..it is mrg

@hilairelaplume1616 Жыл бұрын

This is like the equivalent of saying an Uzi is better than an M4 in a desert

@lucadelgaudio8782 4 ай бұрын

And then the 76/62 italian otomelara is on the Olympus of ciws, better not to forget it anymore

@ayonnion1078 3 жыл бұрын

4 Phalanx ciws 😍

@the_once-and-future_king. 3 жыл бұрын

Maybe you could show them being fired? Think your viewers would like that.

@DreadX10 3 ай бұрын

It was already too much trouble to look up the barrel-length of the goalkeeper. While it only required one more click on the link to the GAU-8 avenger.....

@christopherchartier3017 5 ай бұрын

It’s only 10,000 rpm because it’s just two AK-630’s. And honestly, idk why it needs missiles. The US navy gets around this by using ESSM short range interceptor missiles in combination with the tried and true Phalanx, but I guess Russia just wants to “add more gun”

@user-nr1dx8ni2t 3 жыл бұрын

Millennium Gun 射撃動画に度肝抜かれました！軍艦の砲塔・攻撃機の背中にオンブ・軽戦闘車輌型・陣地の守り…etc 重量3.3t！オールマイティな使い方が可能なCIWSです！(o´∀`)b

@rager1969 Жыл бұрын

I think the cannon used in the A-10 is the same as the one in the Goalkeeper.

@marcussnoek9574 Жыл бұрын

You are correct

@slomo49 3 жыл бұрын

the weakness of the US Phalanx model is that it only holds 900 shells and runs empty very quickly

@Aadiotygod25dada 2 жыл бұрын

and 20mm

@grigorispanousis9745 2 жыл бұрын

@@Aadiotygod25dada theres no issue with it being a 20mm

@reahs4815 2 жыл бұрын

@@grigorispanousis9745 larger caliber means longer range and each round is more effective if its for example a shrapnel round

@fastacker2 Жыл бұрын

Rank them based on speed of killing the target. Not rate of fire.

@venkateshmadewar7865 3 жыл бұрын

Am searching ciws weapon video u made it for me 😍😍😍😘😘😘

@nathanruben3372 3 жыл бұрын

Turkey has built a navy variant of korkut close air defence system which is called gokdeniz. New ships will be carrying this new gun system. Check it out.

@abdullahzaif6097 2 жыл бұрын

Love Turkey from Bangladesh 🇧🇩🇹🇷

@ozdemirdiner1528 3 ай бұрын

Unfortunately video has wrong information. Sea Zenith system is used by Turkish Navy only MEKO class frigates. Origin is Switzerland (Oerlikon Contraves). Turkey has their own system called as GOKDENIZ. System is brand new system which is using Atom Smart Ammunition.

@sergarlantyrell7847 3 жыл бұрын

This should be renamed "Fastest firing CIWS in the world", because that's all these are ranked by.

@Justineexy 2 жыл бұрын

Not completely, Some CIWS in the list are Ranked by the fact that they have missiles.

@sergarlantyrell7847 2 жыл бұрын

@@Justineexy I think comparing combination systems to purely gun-bassed CIWS is not a fair comparison as a system like Kortik or Pantsir is at least twice the size, weight, cost etc of either a purely gun-based CIWS or a self-contained missile system. For example, without ammunition costs, a Phalanx is about $5.6m, about the same for a SeaRAM, and a Pantsir is about $13m-15m. So instead of comparing it to a single CIWS, those types should be compared to the combination of both a gun CIWS and a missile system working together.

@Propapanda0213 3 жыл бұрын

This video is hilarious.

@Propapanda0213 3 жыл бұрын

@Alex ur dad is

@Propapanda0213 3 жыл бұрын

@Alex this vid is full of wrong data, dunno why you get pissed off

@Justineexy 2 жыл бұрын

@Alex You're rude.

@Justineexy 2 жыл бұрын

@Alex wrong what? You're the one that is rude.

@Justineexy 2 жыл бұрын

@Alex See, rude.

@manta1969manta 3 жыл бұрын

Russians know how to do

@howardpowell9673 3 жыл бұрын

Kool

@Mael1er 3 жыл бұрын

Just forgotten the fisrt : the new french 40mm rapid fire. (but it's not still in service, it's maybe because you didn't put it.)

@paulw6057 2 жыл бұрын

AK-630, otherwise known as a Dalek.

@peterpain6625 Жыл бұрын

Probably also same effectiveness ;)

@user-leshiy99rus 2 жыл бұрын

Finally, a more or less perfect video. Thank you for not putting the United States in the first place. As for weapons, the Russian Federation is out of competition. We can bend everyone! ;)

@bronis_lav Жыл бұрын

You missed ak630m2 duet. But just look how ak630m fire, doesn't it looks like it underestimated compare to the higher tiers

@daskissenwurdegecaged-snai3265 Жыл бұрын

bruh the ak-630 should be on 2nd place since its max rpm is literrally higher than 5th 4th and 3rd ciws, and we sort here by rpm, right?

@Yessir1506 Жыл бұрын

And the ammo size is bigger than the ones in the phalanx

@khuhevishohe2 3 жыл бұрын

So Russia rules

@TheMemeApprover96024 2 жыл бұрын

Oh yeah

@yellowstone2ndtrumpet304 2 жыл бұрын

That depends...

@yellowstone2ndtrumpet304 2 жыл бұрын

@TRACKS True... It has already the nice look to have on a space ship. Jezus did not come from this world some one sayed, i wonder from where he did. :0) I wonder how long ago a planet like earth could already have exist, when the stars where more cloose to each other then they are now and how far ahead some live already could be in science, when the concept of it is already for millions of years the same. 1 visit and we will watch in the barrel of a future laser canon that split a planet while still holding a stick ourselfs. Lets keep fighting ourselfs and waste good time. ;0)

@leprechaunbutreallyjustamidget 2 жыл бұрын

Yeah their almost a match for farmers

@yellowstone2ndtrumpet304 2 жыл бұрын

@@leprechaunbutreallyjustamidget they all float down there...

@halloschmitty 3 жыл бұрын

I haven't seen the video yet and I won't watch it. BUT I know America is always swept up in exaggeration

@anzonysanabria2995 3 жыл бұрын

No habrá una versión de este canal en ESPAÑOL?

@jonsauca 3 жыл бұрын

@jeffersonchau7171 2 жыл бұрын

It's interesting on How the Swiss make guns but don't fight with them

@clangerbasher 3 жыл бұрын

Phalanx at 4? Really? Is it the clever 20mm rounds? No because it can only fire solids. Can it be directed at all angles? No. It would barely scrape the top ten.

@mhero6865 3 жыл бұрын

Many of the others barely qualify as prototype or BETA models. Well over 1,000 of Phalanx systems have been fielded and millions of rounds have been fired through them. And only about 1/2 of the nations on this list have real navies. Again more internet pipe dream lists that never take into account real world application. Much like Armata until you field and use these systems in the ecosystem they would exist you don't know how well it works.

@danny5637 3 жыл бұрын

@@mhero6865 500 M1a2 sep+

@reahs4815 2 жыл бұрын

@@danny5637 yea cuz russia have only 20 tanks lol

@undercover1790 Жыл бұрын

@@reahs4815 Thousands of tanks!!!1!1 yet half of them don't work, a quarter are really old soviet models and the rest of the semi modern ones are being slowly picked off in Ukraine.

@27rus63 3 жыл бұрын

I read that we have started developing a supersonic cartridge in Russia, I do not know the caliber, but it is known that the conventional barrel of the weapon is enough for 20-30 shots. the information is old.

@beebeebooboo4888 3 жыл бұрын

Oh so like every other bullet that breaks the sound barrier

@pcmattress5221 3 жыл бұрын

@@beebeebooboo4888 You can't expect people from countries with no civilian semi-auto rifle ownership to know about things like that.

@ricardomartins8765 2 жыл бұрын

Great video but this one is better: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/js-fZ9pp0JnPdGw.html

@PunishSlave 3 жыл бұрын

Buen video

@6ixss 3 жыл бұрын

Its scary that #1 seems like a Robot :P

@shiocchi9740 2 жыл бұрын

AK-630 - Average at shooting ballon, bad at shooting neptune.

@E7R1I6C 2 жыл бұрын

Lmfao

@sovietunion9131 Жыл бұрын

@Ceyhanl-se6vv 3 жыл бұрын

🇹🇷 Gökdeniz Korkut-D not Zenith

@trollllllll4499 3 жыл бұрын

Now we have korkut to replace CIWS and sea zenith

@falcofalcon2613 3 жыл бұрын

request TOP Counter-RAM

@FullOfGuides 2 жыл бұрын

Isnt it amazing how Russia is mostly focused on DEFENSE weapons while USA is mostly focused on ATTACK weapons? Russia has the best CIW while USA has the best Drones and Jets.... makes you wonder who is real international the bully.

@vladimirputin6283 2 жыл бұрын

Russia does not build aircraft carriers for attack, but builds nuclear submarines for defense, think about it

@Niko_from_Kepler 2 жыл бұрын

Do you really believe that? I don’t think that those huge missile launchers on Russian destroyers are made for defence. Furthermore, the best CIWS are from Switzerland/Germany, because their bullets are better.

@vladimirputin6283 2 жыл бұрын

@Niko_BG huge missile launchers on Russians ships are made for the destruction of American aircraft carrier groups, yes man, it is necessary for protection, the Russians have not yet used their destroyers, but have the Americans used their aircraft carriers? - Yes

@reahs4815 2 жыл бұрын

@@Niko_from_Kepler you really believe that Germany have better CIWS than Russia?

@Niko_from_Kepler 2 жыл бұрын

@@reahs4815 of course. Only the rate of fire is better on Russian CIWS.

@user-fj2vi2qd8f 3 жыл бұрын

Перевод , где перевод? Инглиш нихт понемейт.

@user-fj2vi2qd8f 3 жыл бұрын

@@010joejoe Шпрейхен зи дойч.

@user-fj2vi2qd8f 3 жыл бұрын

@@010joejoe Я я , капуть

@user-ec4vk5yw6n 3 жыл бұрын

😁

@gjfjdjd 3 жыл бұрын

Пусть учат Рашен прекрашен😃

@Absolut531kmh 2 жыл бұрын

Pantsir-ME/M has both cannons and missiles. And Where's the type 1130?

@tw4982 3 жыл бұрын

If you’re going to list a true top-ten for CIWS..they all aren’t just guns. Guns have proven too slow for very low altitude supersonic anti-ship missiles. Yes, a gun can hit the missile; it’s the tracking and direction process that makes its reaction time as a weapon system sub-par for these types of missiles.

@tw4982 2 жыл бұрын

@John Grigg That’s one of the reasons the front line US warships went from the Gatling to the Rolling Airframe Missile; multi-spectral and fire and forget. It’s still aimed with the Phalanx radar..

@iluminas2866 2 жыл бұрын

@John Grigg yea something like the rheinmetal hel system basicly a Mantis C-Ram + High Energy Laser

@vadeinpace2998 3 жыл бұрын

Лучшее оружие у Великой России!!! ☝️

@4ik4irik43 3 жыл бұрын

Ну, Каштан и Панцир-М, базару ноль, лучшие в списке, поскольку имеют ракеты (Панцирь-М с новыми твёрдотельными топливными элементами первой ступени), да и плотность огня очень высокая даже без ракет, однако , если смотреть на эффективность только пушечного вооружения,без учёта ракет, то турель под номером 10(Немецкая) будет лучше, поскольку имеет программируемые взрыватели на фугасных снарядах 35 -ки(очень маленькая плотность, однако высочайшая поражающая способность ). Российская же турель,без учёта ракет, имеет контактные взрыватели на фугасных снарядах , поэтому поражается цель за счёт плотности огня непосредственным попаданием в саму цель снаряда, а не детонацией рядом с целью, как в случае Немецкой зениткой( бесконтактным подрывом(поражение плотным пучком осколков)).

@yotub_A_Vorobiov 3 жыл бұрын

@@4ik4irik43 Мне кажется, что эффективность систем защиты сильно зависит от скорости ракеты. Перехват сверхзвуковой, а тем более гиперзвуковой ракеты некая вероятность удачи. Возможно сбить первую ракету, если слить весь боезапас одной очередью, потом надо бежать спасаться (ракеты ходят стаей).

@4ik4irik43 3 жыл бұрын

@@yotub_A_Vorobiov , понять бы ещё чьей ракеты (зенитных комплексов систем защиты корабля или вражеской ракеты?), причём тут боезапас(если скорострельность не означает что у комплекса боезапас всего 10000 выстрелов, поскольку есть такое понятие как погреба корабля, где хранится боезапас и может подаваться с ленты в 100 к патронов), понять бы(зачем рассматривать какие-то конкретные ситуации атаки вражескими ракетами без учёта работы несколькими зпрк или ещё лучше совместно с другими комплексами различной дальности действия двух, а то и трёх типов комплексов дополнительных эшелонов обороны корабля, а то и целой эскадры?). Сути вашего комментария я не понял.

@4ik4irik43 3 жыл бұрын

@@yotub_A_Vorobiov , если про скорость, то если гиперзвуковая зашла в область применения пушечных комплексов, то современные автономные и полуавтономные системы, позволяющие быстро обрабатывать данные(захват цели, расчёт упреждения) и быстро на определённой дальности осуществить выстрел(особенно если первый и второй эшелоны были прорваны и не смогли перехватить гиперзвуковую, то комплексы уже готовы среагировать, они лочат ракету за 10-20 км с помощью радара корабля, поэтому собьют, если у гиперзвуковой не будет большая угловая скорость относительно турели(но это очень маловероятно, потому что это может быть, если ракета мимо корабля летит), а на встречных курсах турель справиться на изи ),

@4ik4irik43 3 жыл бұрын

@@yotub_A_Vorobiov но, если про ваш случай, когда у наc по какому-то борту стоит одна турель, не учитывая боезапас, на наш корабль летят две гиперзвуковые ракеты, которые были не перехвачены другими ракетными комплексами большой и средней дальности поражения, то если мы поразим на встречных курсах одну ракету, возможно, нам не хватит времени переключиться на другую цель и поразить её. Здесь решают: скорости УВНов , скорость горизонтального привода, скорость полёта снарядов, скорость реакции комплекса на таких скоростях на расстоянии от 4 км и ближе, ТТХ зенитно-пушечного комплекса(турели). В конкретно таких условия или схожих, возможно, вы правы.