SmallMediumLarge41 dude, that would be a great match up!

BanditIncorporated You should try and get on here bandit!

BanditIncorporated we want bandit mr sunday and nick mason Vs dan hal and mundy 6 man tag ! Australia vs USA ! Battle of the Nicks !

What happened to KZfaq I would love too, but it would need to be a Skype international episode........plus neither me nor mr sunday show our faces......so it would be difficult haha

BanditIncorporated agh shame maybe an aussie movie fights tribute podcast with you and mr sunday, love your videos man keep up the great work

***** Chiraq!

It really is fun to listen to these arguments with hindsight

Nathan Buchholz he was not great at judging consent

Scott Mantz You're a cool movie fighter Scott! Hope to see you back soon!

Scott Mantz You're always the best, Scott!!! You're the ultimate fact checker!

Scott Mantz Big fan here Scott! You were robbed last time and I do hope to see you in the future here on movie fights and take the belt.

If you combine your knowledge with dan's arguing skill... no one would ever dare to fight that guy.

Scott Mantz Hope to keep seeing the Rain Man Fact Checker regularly.

Dan Murrell This is really Dan? Well, I'll be. I like you as a fighter, but hoo-boy were you really harsh on WB/DC. Just _my_ opinion (with respect), though i'm totally aware of where you're coming from. ^_^

Dan Murrell You Rock at this Game dude!

Congratulations Dan! Here is a question you could use. If you could hire any movie character to kill your worst anemy, who would you hire?

I missed someone defending LOTR material as best 2000's movie. There were so many great arguments to use (including technology and technique advances). But your pick was great anyway and your arguments even better. Well deserved win!

Dan Murrell Thanks for commenting Dan, I really enjoyed the arguments! Hey business is business and the Mundy Man is subliminal, he's just trying to get an edge and take you out of your zone. lol I would have Chosen Requiem cause I think it's incredible, but the show is going great, love seeing you guys having a good back and forth! Bring on Chris and Jeremy(DING)

taqu I also don't think Nick should've won Round 5, about which character needs a prequel, though that's only my personal opinion. I really liked Spencer's idea about Dumbledore and Grindelwald. Dan said that we've seen that already, but we actually haven't, because the story of Grindelwald and Dumbledore's sister was left out of the movies. It was a BIG plot point in the last book and really tied in to the other things that were happening, giving us insight into the character of Dumbledore as well as his relationship with Harry and the surrounding wizarding world. This was one of biggest omissions in my opinion, so I'd love to see a stand-alone movie about it.

+taqu "What should Joss Whedon's next movie be" doesn't say "pitch me Joss Whedon's next movie." It seems perfectly fine to me. In all cases, you're not pitching the movie anyway; you're saying why it's a good idea. The argument ultimately comes down to this: another big budget superhero movie, an out there remake, or an original concept? That seems like a totally fair fight.

ncolaros I don't think the technicalities of the way the question was phrased matter that much because, after all, this isn't a very formal show. It's not so much a question of can he argue it (since Andy ruled he can, that about settles it) but SHOULD he argue it. I'm not saying he should've made a specific pitch, but giving us some sense of what sort of movie it could be - general themes, genre etc. - and at the very least explaining how and why Wheadon could deliver a good original movie right now would've improved that round a lot. His only real arguments were against the others, not for his own, about why we don't want to see another adaptation. His answer was valid, but the only concrete things he came up with were that he should get 300 million and free hands, relying on his faith on Wheadon's skills to come up with something amazing (even though not every, or even most, directors work well under those conditions or have realistic and interesting dream projects), which basically means its up to your imagination. As I said, it's hard to argue against "a good Joss Wheadon movie" if you don't even specify WHAT makes a good Joss Wheadon movie. Really, if you want to break it down, the only other concept you can argue on an equal level to an original idea would be an adaptation - and I guess documentary could be counted as third. But since this is about Wheadon, it has to be a little more than that. I suppose if the the arguments had truly been "a superhero movie", "original idea" and "an adaptation (other than superhero)", everyone would've been on the same page at least (and not arguing about the semantics). Instead, Spencer and Dan both gave more concrete answers and Mundy got to poke holes in the specifics. I don't know about you, but I think that the well-thought out arguments and passionate fights are what make this show interesting and entertaining. While I don't care who wins, giving him the point makes it feel like Andy is encouraging giving short answers that don't leave much for discussion instead of good arguments. I've seen this in other episodes, too - Mundy sometimes uses lack of specific ideas as a way to foolproof his overall argument against criticism, which I guess can be a good way to win a fight but does not make it a good or interesting debate. Here's an example that I think helps illustrate my point: If this had been about Tim Burton's next project, a very valid (and growingly popular) pick would've been an original movie that goes back to his roots. Here you would explain what you think are his roots, when he was at his very best and most original. Then deconstructing what elements made those movies so great. Then looking at people Burton has worked with and saying what collaborations have and haven't worked (Depp or no Depp, etc.), what new tricks he could use to make it new and not just a nostalgic attempt at renewing his glory. Then you could explain why this a good time for this, talking about his latest pretty terrible projects and why they have gone so wrong. Lastly, you could add that making it on a small budget would make it more personal and intimate, without reliance on CGI. Btw, even though I just barfed a whole lot of words on this comment section's floor, it's actually been a while since I saw this episode and commented, and I had to refresh my memory on why I had commented and felt this way. I still agreed, but I didn't then and don't know feel now that strongly about this (who gets the point is not something I take seriously on its own, I just don't like to see a simple argument that made a fight less interesting and entertaining get a pass from Andy), I just think it's interesting to try to explain my point better. Debate, and all that. I know some people automatically assume a lot of text means defensive and therefore aggressive on KZfaq, but I enjoy long discussion.

Charlie Angel wow chill a bit maybe?

11Angelica Tapia Lagos I Know!! The looks on Dan's face ..... I laughed so Hard!!

TalixZen But you yourself missed the point. The question was, WHAT FRANCHISE SHOULD BE REDONE AS RATED R? Get it? Your taking the franchise and redoing it from scratch with an R-rating. The question asks you to take a franchise that would benefit or have benefited if the movies were made R-rated from the get go and all the different plot devices that come with that rating. Nick totally missed the point, pitching a sequel and not a remake, he tried to salvage it later, but it was obvious he misunderstood. It was not what franchise could continue with R-Rated sequels (which is basically what Harry Potter: The College Years is), but should have been made R-rated from it's start, due to the subject matter it was tackling and changes in the characters that the series want to invoke and the feelings they try to draw from the audience. As such, Harry Potter is not a good fit cause an R-rated adventure about kids learning to be wizards in a school environment does not work. Apes and Hunger Games are natural choices as the topic choices are very mature. Apes was probably a better choice and an easier one to pitch. Hunger Games should have been R but had the misfortune of its main fanbase being teens and needing to get the fanbase into the seats was more important than the intellectual integrity of it's subplots.

***** There was a clear underlying implication that it was dealing with a preexisting franchise that was done not in rater R, but should have been. That's how I saw it and that's how everyone else interpreted it. They didn't reject his answer due to technicality anyways. It was a garbage answer and a garbage setup. You can't argue BS and make it look like gold.

Wasabifold it was more than underlying lol. it was the question. i loved nick's creativity in the first two rounds but he fucked that one up. if lotr was your answer for instance than it would be the story of frodo getting the ring to mordor with and r rating (so the style would be more like GoT, for instance) not a r-rated elf spring break spin-off (as much as mundy would like to see that)

Wasabifold "The question was, WHAT FRANCHISE SHOULD BE REDONE AS RATED R?" If that was the case, then Spencer should be eliminated as well since his pitch was for the upcoming Apes movies. He was talking about using the R rating to truly show man's descent. That would be in the upcoming movies not the ones already made. The last movie started showing their descent. The next movies would benefit from the R rating by showing the humans doing horrible things that they can't do in PG 13. He even said so himself. Both were talking about the next chapter of the story. I'm not gonna argue which deserves an R rating. Just wanted to point something out.

Wasabifold You said it yourself; "What Franchise SHOULD BE REDONE AS RATED R?" You telling me that in the process of redoing the franchise they couldn't just make the change to update the age group to fit with the theme? It's not like the first franchise that was redone to accommodate a shift in tone (either adult or more child-like). But even if you move you don't like that, we are still remaining in the same franchise. We're not talking about future iterations, and this is why Spencer would be disqualified. No one is arguing to use them in High School years in an R setting.

+Woohoo! Lifeisamazing Well that movie can be covered in one sentence: Aegon arrived on top of the dragon and sloughtered everybody. That story would be this and this only. harrenhal was greatest fortress ever built. Bring dragons and it is ruin. Gardener king had the greatest army in westeros. Bring dragons and here we have a Field of fire. There would be no tension. On the other hand I would like to see it for efects and for acting but that is same for rebelion. Trident, Sumerhall those were battles fought by man where anyone could have won.

What is the doom of Valarya?

The time that Valyria was...you know...destroyed. That's why it's a wasteland that nobody goes to anymore.

nope, best would be anything with lyanna mormont

***** I wouldn't mind a couple of "mainstream" actors, but yeah that would be the best thing ever.

I'd still rather see the Rebellion and the Battle of The Tridon.....Robert Boratheon with A warhammer and army of the Targaryen crown......CMON

I'm with you on this one, the judging went super biased to get Dan to win, and it was demonstrated with that William discussion...

João Bley While I agree that Spencer should have won the first round, Dan should have won the second. So really, Andy is very inconsistent. I don't think it's favouritism, it's just he's unable to separate personal biases from people's choices properly.

João Bley I think they all know, if Dan loses, he'll have a temper-tantrum ... like with Nick's answer in round 3. He takes it too seriously. I personally don't like watching Dan in these movie-fights because he drags the fun down.

João Bley I agree 100%. Dan didn't even say what happened in his movie beyond 'see how the wall's built'. The drama is what people love about Game of Thrones & it's like the biggest thing right now so even if only fans go see it, that's millions of people. You don't make a Fast movie about dialogue and intense political debate in hopes of getting more people...? And from there, it was just... everything Dan says that's vaguely sensical, Andy hails. It's gonna' be boring if that's gonna' be the way of it always.

PurpleBadger Get out of town. What Dan said is definitely a great suggestion. In the big budget world of movie, the amount of money a studio would through behind a Game of Thrones movie is definitely the perfect opportunity to explore more of that fantasy that Game of Thrones teases but doesn't have the budget to do. White walkers and the importance of the wall is pivotal to the whole series and we barely get to see them. This way we can explore a fresh story that will give the action and fantasy and I'm sure they won't skimp on the politcal side of it either. The Stark/Baratheon coup is hardly something the show can't cover, as it is relatively recent. But a White walkers and inauguration of the wall is definitely something fans will want to see as well. Now I definitely agree Spencer made the better points that round, but Dan's suggestion was never about alienating the politcal tension(he just neglected to mention it in his pitch and Spencer capitlized excellently), but was instead about exploring the fantastical setting in a way TV show budgets cannot do. Both excellent choices and stop riding the Andy loves Dan train. Dan's suggestion was not bad in any way, in fact his is more likely to get made if you were to pitch it to a studio. That way the studio can secure their own cast and build their own story, more room for franchise building as well as any story they do won't encroach on the current show.

HAHAHAHA! Wow I never noticed that! I'll never see him the same way again.

Noah Caboose WOW i see it now.

Noah Caboose and just as annoying =P

Noah Caboose Nah, he need hairier arms. :P

If you watch the schmoes know channel, everyone calls him "Cocaine Donkey"! I think its a shirt on their merch site now. The human Imdb man. Scott Mantz is awesome. Hal rudnick's cool too

There was an R-rated cut of The Wolverine (2013) on Blu-ray, but I haven't seen it so I don't know exactly how far they went with the gore.

Good thing they'll be doing that in the Deadpool movie

Walter Kovacs. Really!? Sounds interesting:

Walter Kovacs It was pretty gory at times. Near the end you know what I'm talking about.

Matthew Leiner I agree. Wolverine does a lot of damage with those claws of his. I want to see more of the gore that comes along with those adamantium claws of death. Good job!

honkuscam707 YESSS!!!! Whos playing a young Doc Brown tho?

Versace Pancakes I dont no why they got all mad at him for saying he wants christopher lloyd. Did they even bother to look at current pictures of him? how different does he actually look from that role to now? with the crazy hair and another wrinkle here and there he is basically the same actor still. I dont see why he has to be younger considering he looked 70 something in 1955, he looked 70 something in 1985, and he looks and is 70 something now.

Bill Hader can play a young Doc Brown...hes funny and looks crazy lol

honkuscam707 it was awesome!! blow my mind

TeamFruitSalad what about his cameo in a million ways to die in the west?

Nathaniel_Fisher Jr. yeah once the judge rules it fair play every time you whine about it being a cop out you're just whining, not arguing. the judge just fricking said it's not a cop out.

Chris Kurtz It was a cop out. He basically said I just want him to do anything he bothers to create. It's the easiest argument because you don't have to argue about any specific points about the project, all you have to do is keep pushing general arguments that amount to nothing

did dan say specifically what he wants joss to do with justice league other than make it good? you're reaching.

Chris Kurtz Learn what reaching means. I'm not reaching at all. But Dan gave a specific franchise and gave reasons why not only that franchise needed but what Joss Whedon could potentially add. (The lack of palpable wit and charm in DC movies is glaringly apparent, and he talked about why Joss Whedon's style and what he's done with Avengers is really what DC needs) With Nick's answer he basically got a free pass without having to talk about why Whedon would suit the theme of any specific franchise, or having to dicuss what Whedon can bring to the table. None of those things he had to consider. All he had to do was sorta discredit the other two, without pushing anything for himself. And Andy ate it up. A cop out is an answer that allows you to not have to work as hard as another answer. The easy way out. Whether it was a legitimate answer or not, (I believe it was) it IS a cop out. The cop out answer for that question.

#stillwatching too :D

Greer Galloway(Formerly Known as ultimategamings) John from Flick Pick has said hes been offered to come on, but he can't because he lives in Indiana.

Greer Galloway(Formerly Known as ultimategamings) Agree with Stuckman, but I don't like Jahns at all.

nuimaleko7 shame about John from the Flick Pick, but what's wrong with Jahns?

Greer Galloway(Formerly Known as ultimategamings) Oh god! No to Stuckmann, dude lives up his own ass.

Grrr of thrones.

builder dude I would watch Grrr of Thrones like 50 times. Best movie of the century!

***** It was funny, but I wish he picked more serious choices so that if he did win, we could have seen how pissed Dan would have been.

詹姆斯 I don't mind Nick's choices. He was being very creative, where the other two went with the most obvious options.

Nick was robbed, his creativity and arguments are exactly what Andy says will earn points. Never heard Andy explain how a round was won, he just mumbles and then yells Dan's name

I completely agree, he needs to join them with the cinemasins fight

Brendan Geier Yes Yes Yes. Must see Doug Walker!

Brendan Geier Yes. Doug Walker vs. cinemasins vs. Charlie Schneider ( ***** ) or Patton Oswalt. :)

YAAAAAAAAAAAS!!!! I COULD DIE HAPPY IF THAT HAPPENED! :D

Brendan Geier Awesome idea! :)

Matt Alexander Kristian Harloff + JJ has been done, probably the worst episode. Lets put JJ in a normal Movie Fight. Harloff is someone I would prefer not to be invited back.

I could do without Kristian in any other movie fights! He is super annoying and it is hard to listen to home 99% of the time! And him with jeremy wasnt the best idea! I want Chris Stuckmann, Jeremy Jahns, and Spencer to go up against each other!

McKenna Debus That would be good too! I think Kristian is awesome though but okay!

Matt Alexander I know lots of people that like Kristian, but for some reason he bothers me.... not sure why but if he is with some other people it might be better!

Jeremy Jahns and Kristian Harloff teamed up, that's why it wasn't as good it should have been. Each of them separate would be much better.

Clive Bigsby Check out Profiles. He co-hosts that with Alicia Malone.

wicked! I will for sure!

Clive Bigsby Yea he's cool. I think he's abit too nice though.

I like him just for the fact that he thinks that the best movie ever is Children of Men, which I would also argue. I just think he is more likely to compliment someone elses argument than try to prove them wrong.

he seems to be Hal Rudnicks nemesis. Mantz would concede if someone chose great and he would lose, where as Hal would take a stab at your ankle and kick you in the teeth while u are down. like the time he said to the chick from DC, that the only reason she likes DC is coz they pay her bills. the fact that he had no legit argument didn't stop him from taking a low blow.

YES!!!!!!

What does Rhett and Link know about movies?

viciousherovicioushero I think they're given the questions beforehand. Not sure how much beforehand. But they could study a little bit in advance. Alicia did that, I belive.

IrishColin94 Joe Bereta

vicioushero they're film makers...

ashowofhands7 I'm confused, how is this episode a championship match? Last time I checked they were just getting to semi-finals of this season :|

Dima Vasilev dude

Jorge Luis Alasia Hidalgo No it's a genuine question, and I'd be really grateful for an answer.

ashowofhands7 T12. Andy Signore (0-1, 0.000) that really must make him mad. And what about that rude guy, jeremy jahns?

IStehSHIT Jeremy Jahns has only shown up once in a team fight which has been stricken from the record. Team fights have been removed in my rankings.

It's basically encouraging the girl to stuff her face with chocolate!

thatisatastyburger Spencer had the best pick.

No one cares that you're a girl

***** it is also unsure if Lyanna was actually captured or if she went with Rhaegar out of her own free will. Also, Game of Thrones: Rebellion is a terrible title :D

***** It's money, money, money. Anyway, I don't think the movie about the 'Long Night' is a good idea, because it sets an expectation different from what the show actually delivers. Like, the movie is about epic battles and monsters and good vs evil. General fantasy stuff. Is that what Game of Thrones is? I honestly think that Robert's Rebellion would make a better movie. If you make it a decent length, then you have enough time to introduce the characters and get the audience familiar with them, and then you can get into the nitty gritty stuff.

AlmostLikeHuman Yes, it is even very likely that she went with him, cause it is implicated that they had something going on, with Lyanna crying when Rhaegar was singing this song n stuff. And yes, that title is despicaple. But I really would love to see Roberts Rebellion onscreen :)

Will Mael yeah, a movie about the Long Night is basically Lord of the Rings. And I love Lord of the Rings for what it is, but GoT ain't that, which is the reason I love GoT. I love it because it turns all fantasy tropes on its head! Making a GoT movie that basically diminishes all what sets GoT apart from all of other Fantasy works is a giant load of jizz onto GRRMs and the fans face.

***** I will never say that Long Night or even any other stories in the asoiaf do not have game of thrones flavour to it..they are stories told from generation to generation, i bet they only say on what happened and nothing more behind the scenes and the actual political madness behind it..I believe that if they want to do it they can write a much more complicated 'game of thrones' type of script based on the same plot for whichever stories that they want..

NASERUS UK Do it & get that cash bro!

Too lazy mate its the consumers life for me :)

NASERUS UK Not possible. Board games need strict wins conditions. Who gets the point here is entirely based on the ruling of a judge, which is impossible to emulate with board game rules. Everyone would need a trained impartial judge for it to work.

LiwenDiamond trained impartial judge? As if cinemasins movie fights has ever had an impartial judge Face it any judge would have bias regardless of their "training"

MacConmheadha Lol, seriously, they need to cover the wall behind Dan. It's just so ugly! What is wrong with that wall, it always catches my eye. Yes, put that in the Speed Round!

MacConmheadha A poster that doesn't fall.

Those hack frauds would be good on the show

Bruinsbiggestbear They're too busy analyzing the masterpiece that is Boyhood. Did you know it took 12 years to make?

John Smith IT TOOK THEM LONGER THAN IT TOOK TO MAKE THE GREAT WALL OF CHINA!!!!

BruinsbiggestbearOH MY GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bruinsbiggestbear They live in Milwaukee

IKR

joel otero This could actually work

He wasn't being serious you idiots it's a reference to a previous Movie Fights were it was proposed that Bill Hader would play a young Vincent Price

joel otero Take a bow, You deserve it for that choice..!

Wilks363 Thanks lol

joel otero I'm surprised Nick Mundy didn't want The Rock as Doc Brown. Maybe he got some coaching from Patton Oswalt. Maybe in the style of Metal Slug and The Fast and the Furious. Just like in The Butterfly Effect, he will attempt to change his past which will be seemingly perfect until he finds out the consequences of changing events in time. It's the reason why he freaks out every time Marty messes with the past/future. Here is where it gets even freakier. *Takes another swig of that Nick Mundy kool-aid* His attempts to change his past distorts reality causing the past and the future to get intertwined into the same time line because he was always a little selfish about his "corrections". While trying to correct time, he must fight Nazi jelly fish aliens and zombies while racing through time and space in his nuclear powered Delorean. You later find out that Doc Brown is really just a title, and the real reason how he figured out how to time travel is because he's part Time Lord. The Doc Brown we know is actually his last regeneration. End of prequel 1 of 12. In the ending, credits we see him regenerating into his next incarnation played by Jonah Hill with Seth Rogen directing the next film. Each prequel will have a different tone from the next.

HECK YES!

likenem Howard the Duck should be the next Joss Whedon TV Show.

Howard The Duck should be on Netflix

Jim Stewart Cohen As long as the cat in your profile photo is in the same house.

likenem He should be in the Deadpool movie.

He just signed on for Toy Story 4

Bshea You just signed on for death sentence

He should make a Bond movie

Batman NICE THAT'D BE A NICE TOPIC

Sleven Kelevra So like set now then? A little too realistic if you ask me. Is it a movie or a documentary?

The Harry Potter series takes place in a magical school for teenagers. What Nick was proposing was a spin-off, not Harry Potter rated R.

***** The question was "which FRANCHISE should be R-Rated". If the Harry Potter FRANCHISE continues past the books, they'd be inventing new material since the book series ended, and if they kept the same cast, they'd be college age. It's not a spin-off at all. For example, the Ghostbusters FRANCHISE is continuing with a new all-female cast. Is that a spin-off or is it part of the FRANCHISE? How many times can I say "franchise" in caps? Place your bets now...

In Terminator 1, John Connor is conceived. In T2, he's GROWN UP into a teenager. In Salvation he's a man. Are the other films spin-offs because the character aged?

***** He wasn't proposing a spinoff, he was proposing a remaking of the series with them in college instead of pre-teen/teenagers. He mentioned wanting to see them remade so he could see things like Voldemort's snake ingesting people and whatnot.

Yea Andy can be stubborn and bias at times, just watch the star wars v. Star trek episode. If there was a potato arguing for Star Trek it would have won.

Oh yeah, Children of Men too. Inception and The Dark Knight maybe. The Dark Knight isn't a great film, it's a good film, but it's very iconic. Spencer's choice: The Wolf of Wall Street is a good film, not a great film. Some of the scenes craft isn't that good, what I mean is for example DiCaprio and McConaughey are talking at the lunch and there is no backround voice from the other people in the restaurant. Also Scorsese sometimes went for kind of easy laughs.

severi saaristo Awesome list buddy

James Rundle Thanks a lot man:)

Some good pics. Especially Oldboy. I'd put City of God in there too

G_Morto oh yeah I totally forgot City of God, one of my top 30 favourite films of all time!:D Yeah it was made 2002? So of course it makes the list.

YES! :D

josh11735 if you mean, Jeremy Jahns, and someone from the schmoes, please, no...they already embarrased themselves enough. (If you mean Chris Stuckmann, of course, he is great).

DocWeaselheart I meant Jeremy Scott from CinemaSins. He makes pretty decent points regarding movies (whether they be nitpicks of individual films, legitimate criticisms of Hollywood practices, or just some jokes about the tropes often seen in movies). Screen Junkies actually did a crossover with his channel once (Amazing Spiderman 2). Keep in mind, I was mainly referring to his points on his personal channel (CinemaSins Jeremy) when it comes to legitimate arguments about movies. The main channel (CinemaSins) is mostly comedy but is still rooted actual plot holes being pointed out.

josh11735 i see, you meant a totally different Jeremy, my bad :)

DocWeaselheart Lol I see the confusion. I like Jeremy Jahns' reviews as well xD

***** Yep I just watched the whole thing, seriously I don't understand why you even bother to call people ... Spencer was just ignored throughout the show

Stanley Kubrick Status.

Sagacious Fox i got the impression that honest trailers about movies that are actually good aren't all that interesting... (boyhood or fight club, for example)

popit198 In a series like GOT

popit198 But I don't think you would want the reaveal of who is Jons mother in that movie. You want it in the books and if you can't get that you want it in the show. Imagine if Jon found out who his parents where and you were just like: "Eh, I knew this already."

Rhaegar* and also Brandon Stark died long before the Battle of the Trident.

R0DisG0D Most people already expect to go "Eh, I knew this already" when they reveal his parents. We have a pretty good idea who they are and what makes sense, so unless the reveal is really off-the-wall, I don't think most people will be that surprised.

Brent345345 Yes, but it is a difference to have it confirmed officially. L+R=J is right now just a fan theory, though it is a likely one.

yeah that could be true, but who knows...

Man Hattan he's a horse to be reckoned with

MaravillaMovies Scoured the comments looking to see if I was the only one who thought this would be awesome! Glad I'm not alone!

MaravillaMovies Count me in! That would be amazing...

MaravillaMovies Or whatabout a Screenjunkies VS RedLetterMedia fight.."OHMYGAAAAAAAWD" to quote Rich Evans

MaravillaMovies I'm not so sure they would be into it, but I really would love to see this.

MaravillaMovies Wouldn't really work. The RedLetterMedia guys tend to be very dismissive of the kind of movies that MovieFights is about. In fact, they seem dismissive of the kind of peopel who are on MovieFights.

Lol yeah that's why, let JJ be his own man this time!

Needs to happen

obviously me 123 For me it is obviously Clockwork orange :) Best movie ever :D

For me it's the Shinning

obviously me 123 Yeah The Shining is also my personal favourite but Clockwork orange, Full Metal Jacket and 2001: A Space Odyssey are amazing as well. He's one of the only directors that always delivered good quality films. That's also the reason why he is one of my favourite directors. :)

obviously me 123 i like Barry Lyndon!

Martynas Valanciunas Thank you! I thought I was the only one who liked 2 a LOT more than 3. Iron Man 3 was one of the most disappointing movies I've seen.

Martynas Valanciunas Yes! Thank you. I agree with all your points. Iron Man 3 sucked WAY MORE than 2.

Didn't the first Iron Man introduce Nick Fury with the post credit scene?

Martynas Valanciunas LEGO suit lol.. yeah everything you said was true. Tony was a wimp, the suit was falling apart and useless (not to mention he spent too much time out of the suit), they just didn't respect the suit at all in that film. And the fire people was sooo stupid. I hated that movie. I liked Iron Man 2, Justin Hammer was funny as hell, the scene where he was selling Hammer tech, Sam Rockwell was fantastic in that film.

Derek Moore Sam Rockwell makes any movie better.

Unfortunately he was off on the quality of Whedon’s movie

The guy threw the first 5 questions, and the 6th should be been considered thrown since he was so adamant about Christopher Lloyd before backing off that choice. He should be grateful that he ended with any points. Shocked that it was that close in the end.

It's like the Corporate Ministry all over again.

TheRealSpiderMew are you shitting me he was a total joke this fight fucking PATHETIC what he did in the CHAMPIONSHIP BATTLE

Yes

RandigCitron Him and Rolfe should be on here.

RandigCitron He would trash all of these guys. Nostalgia Critic made my hate a some of my favorite childhood movies with solid arguments.

RandigCitron YMS

OH PLEASE, SCREEN JUNKIES, NO!!!

I've read The Shining, and I still don't agree. Putting the TV movie aside, which I've actually seen, I don't think I could involve myself in a remake unless the director made the female lead a nervous wreck, a good luck outdoing JN unless you're Heath Ledger. I've read the book, I get the book, I've seen the movie. Spencer is also right when he says it's sacrilege in a way. Everything would have to come together perfectly for it to work and be a better movie. Can't see that happening.

But that's the point mundy and spencer were making- and I agree with. Of course you'd want it to be done well, but it inevitably would be done a little less well (in our opinion), albeit differently. I didn't like Spencer's choice either, for the same reason, kind of. It would be a parody of itself, and no matter what you feel going into the movie, you'd be at some level comparing it with the original, and the chance of Anderson pulling that off, though higher than most filmakers, would still be low. In fact, I reckon that if you were to ask Anderson himself, I'd bet on him declining to do it for the same reasons. But I guess none of us will ever know unless he were to. Agree to disagree.

Memento at the time was based on an unpublished short story by Jonathan Nolan.

Disagree with your opinion on Game of Thrones. Nick was right in regards to that being absolutely boring. They reference what happened during the overthrow of the mad king ten times every season so far. It'd be boring. The wall seemed like a much better story

Although I'd love to hear the story of who Jon's parents are

Ditto

magellanthecat rebuttal: james cameron

***** I respect that. I just feel like I might have heard it from one of them based on all of the praise it gets. but then again I wasn't up there and those three have differing opinions so I guess I can see why it wasn't chosen.

TeamFruitSalad The Dark Knight, as much as it is a good movie, is no contender for the BEST movie of the 00s. Maybe the best comic book movie, but certainly not the best movie in general. There are tons of others that outweigh TDK in conceptual depth, execution, approach, cinematography, screenplay, etc. TDK is every fanboy's first love, and it certainly broke ground in the world of comic book movies. But compared to the greats that came in the 2000s, it's pretty much a non-contender.

***** Spirited Away as well. This is practically a golden age for films once more. The Dark Knight, as i mentioned, is nowhere near as intriguing and thought-provoking as the ones you have mentioned, as well as the ones that have been made. Birdman, King's Speech, Hurt Locker, etc. So many excellent ones that are so legitimately great, The Dark Knight would be minute in their shadow.

Smokey McJoint Oops that's my bad. Point stands on TDK though. But thanks for pointing it out

The Dark Knight has a lot of plot holes and also it's a film that you think more, it gets worse. It's a good movie thou. Heath Ledger is amazing in it, the score is amazing and the cinematography has this great noir kind of vibe to it. But the movie is quite overrated.