He had the best rookie season by a Warriors player since Draymond

🤣🤣🤣💯💯

Shot even more broken too 🤣

@@Hollie.415 🤣🤣

The whole point is that Lauri’s representation would tell the Warriors he’s willing to sign before you trade assets to get him Using the reasoning “it’s no guarantee that trade makes them better” as an excuse to not make a move when your team is clearly flawed and lacking talent is exactly how you end up wasting another year of Steph’s window. No trade is guaranteed to make you better. Every trade is a risk. In order to improve your team you have to take risks. You know what else isn’t guaranteed? 21 year old kids taking a big enough leap to all of a sudden transform this team into a title contender. What’s more likely though? A player that’s a proving all star making this team better, or 21 year olds who haven’t proved anything in a playoff setting, all of a sudden taking a monstrous leap that’s significant enough to help a 36 year old Steph win a championship? The Warriors have a 0% chance of winning a title as currently constructed. Their 2nd best player is 34 year old Draymond Green who can’t be relied on to even be available. This team ain’t good enough. I pointed out in this video the multiple ways Lauri improves this team’s weaknesses. If you want to gamble one of Steph’s last few years of his prime on 21 year olds taking a leap that isn’t guaranteed, you can do that. But I want to maximize this window with Steph while he’s here, because the moment he retires, it doesn’t matter what young player we have, we won’t be winning anything for a while. It’s hard to win championships bro. The last time the Warriors won a chip before Steph was 1975, before that, 1956… Steph is the Micheal Jordan of our franchise, yall would rather prioritize young players over doing whatever is necessary to give this man a shot at 1 more? Cmon man what are we doing here? If you make this trade and it doesn’t work out then SO BE IT! At least you went out TRYING. I can make peace with that. But to use the excuse of “well it’s no guarantee” is insane to me. The Warriors trading for Andrew Wiggins, who many at the time said was a terrible move, and that Wiggins was the worst contract in the league. That same move that “wasn’t guarantee” to improve the team, is the reason they won the 22’ title. Would you consider that a gamble? Yes, because every trade is a gamble. Now imagine if they applied your mentality of not making a move because it doesn’t promise you a chip back when they took the chance on Wiggins…

Looney is sent to Utah in this trade bro

I’m sure he will, but not full time

Wiggins is a negative asset for Utah they don’t want him nor do they have use for him. They’re a rebuilding team. Why would they want a 30 year old vet making 27mil a year that’s inconsistent? All he’s going to do is block playing time for their young players they’re trying to develop. Either Podz or Jk is included, or there’s no deal. The other team has to like the trade your proposing. You can’t be stingy with assets when you’re the team trading for the all star. We either propose a real offer or we don’t get Lauri it’s simple.

Their asking price is nuts

!!!

I appreciate that bro! I really like Podz, I really really don’t want to trade him, I think he’s going to be one hell of a player, but unfortunately I don’t see a way for the Warriors to bring in a difference maker without giving up either him or JK.

Appreciate it 🤙🏾‼️💯

Lmao

I won’t go as far as saying more valuable, but I think he’s going to thrive in our system playing off Steph, also his acceptance of a bench role by itself is valuable. It was a report saying Klay thought he was just as good of a player as before his injuries. So he never would’ve truly been accepting of a reduced role with GS. If Buddy isn’t playing well you can bench him with no pushback

Podz or JK + Moody. No way they get Podz AND JK

@@Hollie.415 I hear you! Ainge is a brutal negotiator as is Lacob. Lauri needs to play with Steph and Draymond.