dude this is super interesting. i would have never thought about it but it makes so much sense! thanks for sharing. also congrats on the dope ass career!

Desislav Velchev or celery :)

@@siskothekid1157 "oh no! My grocery bag filled with loose oranges and one french baguette!"

That makes it really cool' thanks for awesome trivia. Totally great they paid homage to his earlier career

oh

Watch till the end

Josh Kimbrough sjw on sjw warfare

Josh Fitton Hey look he has a bad relationship with his mum

Josh Kimbrough "Lol cracked taking shots at Buzzfeed" Which is ironic because they are both essentially the same website. SJW's producing bullshit click bait articles written by morons who are fatally allergic to both reality & fact checking..... The only difference is that Cracked produces videos that are still funny, where as Buzzfeed videos have NEVER been funny, or clever, or insightful, or frankly the least bit accurate, or intellectual as much as they pretend they are totally smart & stuff.

bowser515 Starship Troopers is recommended reading in the Marine Corps.But the book is better than the movie.

mechredd That's usually the case I suppose, It's a really good movie none the less. And the soundtrack is Awesome..

mechredd of course the book is better then the movie. Dont think its ever been the other way around.its like saying sex is better then masturbation, its true but sometimes you need that instant gratification.

mechredd Since when do Marines read? :D Didn't know they had that comprehension level.

mechredd The book is not in competition with the movie, trust me.

It's a shame that he's been in so many movies that he was never credited for.

OtherGonzo I guess people see him more as a character than a prop by now. ;-p

OtherGonzo Ahh so that's what the protectron from Fallout 3 is modeled after.

OtherGonzo That's true I saw Robbie in an episode of Colombo last week.

tuschman168 Yeah, people know it's name, Robby, even when it has other names in other movies.

Hey Jamie didn't he also have the paper in Wayne's World? He played the coffee shop clerk

Azaraiah Zee No idea! But that's awesome!

+Joshua Lansell-Kenny Not a prop.

+David Wilkins Also it's more of a running joke than something done out of laziness.

+Joshua Lansell-Kenny I believe the focus was 'props' and not 'sound effects'

It's not a prop

it's not a prop

Trevor Merrill personality quiz "how meh are you?"

Don't forget "People from a different part of America try American food for the first time!"

Lmao haha!

I hate Buzzfeed so much, it’s like they actively try to make the male gender feel like crap for existing

That would be amazing. Considering Star Wars is from the late 70s/early 80ss, and the Segway did not exist until this century.

Next thing you know they'll be putting Dengar in a dump truck.. madness.

And Dengar in a dump truck.

***** lol this guy

Crimsontears83 Mc Chris!

The yellow Dr. Who/Bossk suit is also in the cantina, on a presumably human character wearing a helmet.

cmm07r That's called "Easter Egg" not "Overused".

NinjaNezumi Not really, it's the stock news paper prop used in many many shows and movies. Then again why make a new fake news paper when you can use the old one.

CubeArms No, the newspaper was specifically brought up for the purpose of reference. That's an easter egg. This entire video is bullshit, just like almost every single video hosted by this guy. He doesn't know what the term "overused" means.

Oh no! I thought I was him! Seriously. People never lie on the internet!

shia labeouf + Seth rogan = this guy who knows he isn't funny but tries anyway

+Peter Skorupski And that's what's funny

😆

Agreed

I must be toobold for this type of humor, because the very things you point out make this guy annoying as fuck to me!

EDIT: too old*

This is obviously his dad or himself writing this. Couldn't be a girlfriend. No girl is that desperate.

August West The ones that 'don't land' are written that way lol which is even greater

Also, even for a show whose gimmick is over analyzing..... who gives a shit about a license plate? Seriously?

Did you ever see his Robot Chicken sketch? It was really good, they acted like he was an Alien 007.

+Joshua ''Manners are their own reward, gentlemen!''

+Sython6 "Am I the only one who took off their shoes?"

Just R34 that..

***** So many tangents.

***** I remember them all. They were all awesome. Except for Lost Galaxy which was just okay. Space and Time Force were much better.

k9commander The blue ranger in lost galaxy is also Archie Johnson in CSI

k9commander Didn't it piss you off when Wes and Jen didn't kiss, as they left Wes go back to the future? Man that still pisses me off.

***** Yeah but due to time travel, the alternatives where riddled with danger. If Jen stayed in the past, any kids they had would risk getting together with one of Jen's ancestors. Even if they didn't stay together, she risks herself getting together with one of her ancestors. If Wes went into the future, his descendants (Jen's ex-boyfriend and red ranger of that century) would be erased from the time-line. The truth is, their romance was doomed to fail from the beginning. Before you say Jen could have been the one he was destined to be with, his future wife from the future, remember that she dated Wes' descendant. That means her ex-boyfriend would also be her (unknown amount of) great grandson. I wasn't smart enough to understand the complexities of time travel when I first saw the show so I was bummed when they didn't kiss. Now, I'm happy they didn't. Still a great season.

now you have to tell us about it.

I knew it would be in there before I hit play lol, i just remember seeing that prop armor a few times and think about star ship troopers ,and mostly how they had to budget down with some old designs.

I was going to make the same point. It's too bad he couldn't have sent them to a museum, but alas, his movies weren't considered classics yet.

That's a lie. Quit lying to people.

Franklin Falco exactly.

Weldinsson Alcantara Now don't say that buddy, they'll probably replace DOB with the Fucking New Guy for OPCD. Maybe stick him in Does Not Compute and After Hours. He fucking seems to be in every goddamn thing else.

Weldinsson Alcantara Figure it out already... It's for a different audience... Clever Cracked using the same Hollywood tricks (that they make fun of) on us.

+Aussie Muscle you mean on the Blueberry

+Crowley9 I'm pretty sure that "Really?" was meant to be the tone of this entire piece, but that's just me I guess, being cynical, and you know... watching the video Anyway that's what he said.

+Crowley9 Well it is Cracked we're talking about here, one step up from Buzzfeed.

It's kind of a lateral move I guess.

I'm surprised (with all the Star Wars references here) that they didn't point out that IG-88's head (in Ep. 5) is made from the drink dispenser in the Mos Eisley cantina in Ep. 4. Reduce, re-use, re-cycle, I guess!

it was also used in power Rangers . so where the guns but they shot lasers instead of bullets

+intergalactichaiku They should have mentions that short lived series Crusades as well. HUNDREDS of those suits were made and they were floating ALL over Hollywood for a long time :) A lot of the extras from SST took theirs home ;) (wink wink)

I worked on the team that made the armor and helmets for Starship Troopers, we really had to crank out a lot of those very quickly. I took the job without knowing what the movie was, and when I showed up I was so excited to be working on an adaptation of Heinlein's book. I started looking around the shop, thinking I was going to be building big Powered Armor suits like in "Aliens". My heart sunk when I found out that the mobile infantry was just going to be a bunch of guys with flak vests and helmets. Like in "Aliens".

+BanazirGalpsi1968 I think that may have been 'Discounted' as the studios not only reused Robbie, but they also made the each series... In addition, rather than being a reused prop - It was a reused Character. While Robbie the Robot has since gone onto many Cameos in Movies such as Gremlins, its normally a Homage to the past so therefore probably does not count...

I was just glad he continued to find work all those years.

Already holding the door. and shlt just locked us both out. probably best for everyone else anyhow.. |';.^[]7

You're right

...and the actual movie is out by now and it's has a 59% on Metacritic and a 78% on Rotten Tomatoes.

You can't say that, don't you know it has four women in the movie. You're not allowed to say it's a bad movie you woman hater...lol.

It's garbage... i don't care what anyone else scores it.

nope. still idiots.

Good point man, that really is the worst it totally _takes me out of suspended 'movieland netflyxnosis' mode._ It's constantly used when it could be avoided and would be so simple to work or write around.. ;]

There's one specific phone number that's popped up in numerous shows and movies over the past few decades. Here's a video I did about it... kzfaq.info/get/bejne/j7V4l6xesd2YhWg.html

Trenton Fulton I'm pretty sure he can't come back as any species of alien. Always a time lord, and time lords always look human/ humans look time lord.

Trenton Fulton wAIT DOCTOR WHO AND Star wars comics are both owned by marvel comics so it is possible? But then again it was also in the 90's never published fantastic 4!

+paperheartsnreal1s That's not true. The Timelords absorb biodata when they regenerate and if they do it around other species enough it can change their appearance to match. Lord Cardinal Zero once regenerated as a bird for example. It happens super rarely though since most Timelords don't spend enough time around other species.

I was thing a touch of Will Wheaton was in the mix.

Yeah I see that too :)

I get why we need diversity. As a society, we NEED diversity, otherwise it would grow boring and everything would be lame, but it needs to be fluid. I honestly can't see Melissa McCarthy being a Ghostbuster, but because people love her so much, (not me), she gets wedged into a GB role. You let artistic creativity flow, the outcry for diversity wouldn't be needed, but because movies are a business, artistic freedom gets a backseat.

Bichpants McGee this is how movies are made. you make things to make things. your criticism makes no sense. "what if we ghostbusters but with all women" or "what if we made an old western but set in space" are exactly how creativity _works_. the list of movies, often great movies, that simply take an earlier creative work and recontextualize with one conceptual difference is HUGE. paul feig directed bridesmaids, and probably likes working with all of these women. he wanted to make an all-female ghostbusters working with a bunch of women he's worked with before. it's not some weird mystery, and it makes business sense considering bridesmaids was a huge hit.

Bichpants McGee Why couldn't you see her as a ghostbuster? There's no ghostbuster framework. The had two genius, a smart mouth shyster, and a blue collar go who's over his head. Really the only defining characteristic of a ghostbuster is being an utter outcast. Pretty sure McCarthy can play that. Not that I'm a fan of her work or anything, but really there's no strong argument to support the hate other than pure emotional backlash. Oh and on the point of making them all female just to be all female... So what? Why is this bad or irritating to you? Again... no logic/pure emotion.

Because it is a fad. My point of being more fluid, why does it have to be all female? It doesn't have to be all male either. My problem, again, isn't the all-female crew, it's how the producer's seem to have been beating their chests at the announcement at how diverse they were when they weren't being diverse. They're still segregating, but instead of excluding the women so the focus could be on men, they're excluding the men so the focus can be on the women. Diversity would mean they have a mixture of genders and ethnicity. Isn't that what civil rights has been about all these years? Not to include one group only to exclude another, but to bring everyone together in a fair way? Even if they had a solo token male character, I'd be fine because that's more realistic. When has there been, in recent history, a work force or group of people that fit a solitary set of characteristics in people? That's why it feels like they're using an all-female crew just to have an all-female crew.They're cashing in on how P.C. the world's supposed to be today.

bjmensz I get that, and understand that's how movies are made, but when you announce it and the only news I hear is that it's an all-female crew rather than when we can expect it, what the basic plot is going to be, or even any other details about the film, it was almost like those making it were merely patting themselves on the back because they had all women. I take no problem with the all-female crew, it's how those making it are acting is what I take issue with. I know I'm fighting a losing battle here, but I'm going to stand by what I say. Will the movie be good, I don't know. I'm not criticizing it, but merely making an observation that the reasons for making it are less about artistic freedom and exploration but to cash in on the recent push for political correctness.

that's the joke

(And yeah, it was an OK movie. It just wasn't Heinlein's story.)

They used it in Star Trek Beyond

+sean rodgers The movie hardly talked about the suit, which was the coolest part of the book. "Ender's Game" was kind of the same problem; the best part of the book (Ender developing and learning strategy and working with others) got completely skipped in the movie.

No one said it was a faithful adaptation. That is a completely different topic. On the topic of faithful adaptations, if you go around picking highly specific elements from a book and complaining that they are not rendered identically, you'll be mad about most adaptations. Save yourself the time, read the book again, and don't go see adaptations of your favorite books. The filmmaker is not beholden to the fans of the book. They're not even beholden to the author. They buy the rights and then they make the movie that they think works with their vision. It is an entity unto itself.

sean rodgers "No one said it was a faithful adaptation." Good thing, because it wasn't. It also wasn't as good, which was the point, remember?

sean rodgers " They're not even beholden to the author. They buy the rights and then they make the movie that they think works with their vision. It is an entity unto itself. " unless that's the deal they cut. Overgeneralize, much?

Occasionally an author will get more creative control but that's the exception not the rule. The typical best case scenario is that the author will get first draft rights on the screenplay. The director can they ask for a rewrite or even throw out the script entirely. Then, on top of that, the studio typically has authority over the director and can replace him if they want. Kubrick threw out King's screenplay for The Shinning, even though he was a well known author, and Palahniuk didn't even write the first draft of Fight Club. And of course, as to the case in question, Heinlien had no creative control because he was dead. Can you imagine someone's estate bartering for creative control with a director? Not only do author's of novel have little creative control, writers of screenplays don't. A writer is under the control of the director and can be ordered to change the screenplay or be replaced entirely under most circumstances. Rights to the screenplay, like rights to the novel, are a commodity that is purchased.

+hronbubberd cool

Nina Blaze shots fired !!! 🤣

Nina Blaze 🔥🔥🔥🔥

Ha!

not funny Nina!

Very funny Nina

And yet, it is still orders of magnitude more entertaining than anything that has the new guy in it.

***** Not true; the Ted Talks with Disney was damn good. As were the Cracked Responds videos.

CompassRose he's better when he's not trying to be Stereotypical White Nerd. He does cynical surprisingly well, as shown in the videos you mention.

That's actually DoB doing it too. He's rather good at beatboxing.