thanks!

thank you!!!!

No such thing, but the lenses have IS built in. The M50 is a really solid option, pretty close to holy grail

anytime, thanks for watching!

thanks for taking the time to watch!

lol yup a baby 80D!

Quigon Jim I’d recommend a 200D simply because it’s smaller and easier to carry around. Also, it will be lighter when you cold, whereas the 90D (based on what we see for 80D) will be hefty. Also, the 200D is already out, we don’t know how long it will be till we see the 90D. Btw, did I mention, the 200D will also be much cheaper than the 90D?

well given the option, I'd take the 80D or the "90D" but that is just personal taste. The 80D is no doubt a better stills camera. But it comes down to what you want or need. The SL2 is an amazing camera for the price point.

Wafflekang there’s a lot being said about the 90D. We’ll have to wait and see what Canon releases.

thanks man!

anytime and congrats! Let me know how you like it

will do Eric. Just subbed as i like your straight forward style. Thank you!

thank you, appreciate the sub and welcome to the community!

my pleasure

this should help! kzfaq.info/get/bejne/prqgdZyXvZernnk.html

we all are waiting lol, crossing fingers one of the two does this year

Heres my video on it! kzfaq.info/get/bejne/prqgdZyXvZernnk.html

@@Eric_Rossi THANKS SO MUCH!!

of course!

this is it! kzfaq.info/get/bejne/prqgdZyXvZernnk.html

when you buy it, youll enjoy it! Good luck

thanks brother, but yeah I've noticed that too. It's the "look" thats out there. Vloggers arent using camcorders, bad stigma around them

I believe Markiplier used that camcorder (or some Sony Handycam) for his recent vlogs!

@Eric, yea I can not figure out why either. They will go out get an 80D or one of the Panasonic m4/3 camera and put a slow aperture wide angle on it. Yet, cost way more then a AX53. Then they complain about everything.. I got to tell ya the optical stabilization is amazing in this thing, it may not deliver gyro gimbal quality, but it comes close. Turn on the additional digital IS and it becomes so freaking buttery smooth you would be asking yourself why you didn't go this route the first time. I can understand if someone wants to create video with OOF backgrounds as that is really hard to do with this camera. But then again its also hard not to have everything in focus too. I think another youtuber said it best a while back, why bother with anything better then a AX53 when almost 2/3rds of your viewers are watching your videos on their smartphones.. And I agree, about half of mine are already. Which is why I do not post in 4k despite having the hardware to do it. Plus I edit in 4k also. I think proper 1080p is perfectly fine. One of the major reasons I got my AX53 was due to 1080p video from a DSLR looking more like 720p. So much resolution just wasted due to pixel binning. The before and after in my videos when I switched was without a doubt very noticeable. Even when scaled down in a browser window. :-)

I can break this down for you. I actually thought about getting a camcorder for my youtube videos. Ultimately I ended up going M4/3 because of affordable 4k, IBIS, lens choices, size, etc. But the reasons why I wouldn't get a dedicated camcorder is because 1 - DSLR/Mirrorless cams are more versatile with being primarily photography devices that also happen to take great videos - A Sony A6300 will give you great images while also giving you solid video and still being small. 2 - More creative freedom. The option of different lenses available allow you to get different looks and depth of fields to give you more creative looks to your vlogs should you choose. With a Camcorder. You're stuck with the same lens whether you want to be or not. I currently shoot with a kit lens on my G85. But my next lens is a 25mm f1.7 which will give me the 50mm look with a shallower DOF. 3 - As Eric said. Stigma. Camcorders are seen as used for either "home movies" or Serious filmmaking tools (C200, FS5, etc). Until Casey Neistat, Sawyer Hartman, Peter McKinnon or whoever comes out and makes it cool to use your dad's old camcorder to make youtube videos with. It's not going to be cool. And why don't those guys use Camcorders, see my 2 reasons above. Hey for a lot of people like it might actually be more practical for them to use a camcorder and they might get better results for their beauty blogs or exercise channel. But the people they look up to don't. Including.. Eric.

Well size wise, a AX53 is actually smaller then a DSLR (APS-C or m4/3) I really do not agree on. The AX53 is very light and smaller then a DSLR. But creative wise due to lens choices, yea we both agree on that. Price wise though a AX53 is around 800 up to 900 USD. Which makes it more affordable. That said, I get the creative part. But I am more talking about those youtubers who just vlog and stick with one wide angle lens. Its really not a good investment for them.

I believe its an HDMI D, micro

Just a local shop has them

Brand?

M6 no question! Much better autoficus! using the kit lens that comes with it, leaving it toward the wider angle, will easily help for vlogging.

@@Eric_Rossi Hi Eric, thanks for the feedback and for making this helpful video! What about straight out of the camera color science? Some say Canon runs too warm or has oversaturated reds. Thoughts?

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/prqgdZyXvZernnk.html

All depends, what are you shooting? More stills based or video?

Mostly Stills. Thanks

heres a video! kzfaq.info/get/bejne/prqgdZyXvZernnk.html

Ok afraid of a little work

unbroken1010 its not little work if you take 3000 pictures on 10 days vacation trip

Not really, Canon changed things up with their batteries so I wouldnt feel comfortable going third party honestly. I used to be that way but I've had third party batteries burn out quickly and damage the camera. So I've just stayed on brand, plus if anything goes wrong the brand can easily help. Especially under warranty.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/prqgdZyXvZernnk.html

Yeah, I wouldnt touch the g7x line anymore as they dont have dual pixel af. Not saying its bad, but all depends on what you want a camera like this for.

yup!

m6 easy

yeah I dont get the logic for the M5 lol, have it flip to the side

My Sony a65 flips the LCD downwards too, useless.

Flip down allows you to take shots over your head in crowds, etc.

Here is the link: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/prqgdZyXvZernnk.html Congrats on getting the M6! Let me know how you like it

check it out: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/prqgdZyXvZernnk.html

nope, its pretty good! With anything you have to take care of it sure and not be reckless but this isnt a bigger build camera so it has its give or takes

Thank you Eric 👍

Glad you were able to see what you needed!

Personally the M6 is a much better camera, worth the extra money. M50 if I had the choice

much better, IQ wise, way more functionality.

This should help: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/prqgdZyXvZernnk.html

thank you!

@@Eric_Rossi I'm really thinkg about buying this for my first camera so I can start my youtube channel. I got to know if the m6 can be used as a webcam?

if you want a webcam, id save some money and get a webam like the logitech c920

@@Eric_Rossi I was tinking about getting a webcam but wanted the picture quality of a camera. The M6 has almost every feature I want and most importantly it's in my price range.

much better image quality, af speed etc. The XA5 is more of Fuji's entry level camera

hmm are you shooting 4K? 45 mins wouldnt be possible as the recording limit is 30 mins without an external monitor. What SD card are you using, what class?

@@Eric_Rossi nah man I don't believe so, I'm shooting (1920x1080) 29.97P. The card I'm using is a SanDisk Adapter with a Ultra Plus 64gb card in it. Any thoughts why it'd cut out? I could try and use the Interval Shots, but it goes so quick ya know? Or I may have it set wrong haha

Try getting an SD card, not micro, and see if it helps

Hi

which advantage?

@@Eric_Rossi I was waiting for someone to ask..lol..I have some old Canon FD glass one being a 400mm f2.8L lens that can now finally be used with a Canon camera ,with an adaptor that does not contain glass such as the cheap FD to Eos adaptors on ebay ,that degrade the image quality. Previously the EF mount extended the flange distance (film/sensor to front of camera lens mount) to 44mm meaning that FD lenses couldn't make use of a simple physical adaptor (they had a 42mm flange distance).By doing this a physical adaptor without glass was impossible to make.Now Canon did once make a half decent FD to Eos adaptor,when the Eos mount was introduced. These are rare as hens teeth,still contained glass to achieve proper focus and if you do find one it will cost $1,000 for the adaptor alone.

Honestly, they are about the same. I'd take the m50 at this point

Eric Rossi appreciate ya man! 🙏🏽

@@Eric_Rossi Why?

It’s essentially personal preference. But I think the cam focuses a bit better and I like the flip screen orientation more. But you can’t go wrong with either.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/prqgdZyXvZernnk.html

Thank you so much! Great review bro.

canon 1dx ii

100%

$299 at B@H now.

Well I bought this before the M50 was announced, but I covered why I still choose the M6 over the M50 in a video

yeah its a great price now since the v2 came out! That 22mm is one of my favorite lenses, the bokeh is great!

Jason Eyermann the M6 ii shoots 4K, not the original.

it does at 1080p

it does not

oh totally, I wouldnt recommend the m100 anymore. Its either between the M6 or M50.

@@Eric_Rossi where was this review 2 days ago...Lmao! I just discovered m6 today.... M100 goes back :)

thats more lens than camera body, so no need to worry

@@Eric_Rossi thanks bro 🌷

thatd be a great find!

Eric Rossi What glass do You use for the M6??

mainly just the kit lens, but I can adapt my Canon L lenses on it if I need

congrats on the purchase, you'll enjoy it!

I've messed with the a5, its meh. Nothing exciting about it to me. Plus the video, besides it not having 4k which I dont care about, is so much better in the M6

Eric Rossi I see,how about compared to canon g7x Mii ,could you say m6 is a better version?.the pricing seems to be almost same..🙄

great price

Now $420 with kit lens and $350 body only brand new returns accepted ebay

@@huntermitchell6335 ..yes I seen those..but it says they are imported models and include a third party charger . So I'm not sure if I would buy one of those .

@@toledojeeper2932 Did the same thing and bought a gopro 4 for $100 worth it

@@toledojeeper2932 Always have more trust if they have 30 day returns AYYYYYYY

I'll make a video on both soon and which I feel is the better buy, but keep the m6

i think i may stick with my M6 :-)

lol thanks, I've tried and I'm not a fan of it. I've tried a full goatee, meh.

what do you mean, its the same thing