Yeah, agree. They need to produce more frequently I think to keep the algorithm happy.

Thank you for reminding us how little success has come from our efforts, lol. But seriously, we’re ready for a little algorithm love.

@@hardcutreviewsI watch all the videos and love the channel, but I think you could do a better job satisfying the “algorithm gods”

@@eanderson9599 We love free advice. Do tell.

Appreciate you sticking with us as we claw and scrape our way through the KZfaq death maze. They’re not making it easy.

Appreciate that. No other drawer would do.

You'd think Winston would have supplied them with a reliable vehicle from this century but then how would they cash in on the nostalgia?

Yep, a lot that doesn't make sense. Two years has passed since Afterlife, Winston is rich, with a new lab, but can't buy a new vehicle in that two years time? I mean, there is the newish van, but it's not being used much. The film is actually a little better on second watch, but still needs a lot of improvements. SONY needs to get their act together and stop with the memberberries, and get better writers for the next one, with less CGI.

Indeed it's very off-brand

Literally is

@@SpartanNebula and stupider than Remnant. Man, I miss when FNAF wasn't so complicated😐.

It’s a YA movie that could have been based on a fanfic written by a YA. Kid-centric, with occasional adult humor, mostly focusing on teen angst and coming-of-age issues.

You speak the facts.

Appreciate it, dude. KZfaq can’t hold us back forever.

Chess girl doesn’t hold a candle.

His character was pointless.

@anubusx Sadly enough, his character became a welcoming break from the teen angst that this movie overly focused on.

I find it dumb how nobody in the world cares that ghosts, demons and ancient gods exist.

That’s the mashup we all didn’t know we needed.

All of it needs to be critiqued. Its painful.

BTTF is safe until Gale and Zemeckis are dead. The day after they are gone... get ready.

Wack to the Future 😄

No. They do not.

@@hardcutreviews The girl walks into the ghost-busted headquarters and can log into the computer and use a dangerous and untested device, there is no password protection on the computers and no locks on the door. If she didn't do this the main villain would not have been freed and the machine holding all the ghosts would not have broken.

It’s funny. Our sub count slowly grows, yet views drop each video. Been seeing this across a lot of channels in the past few months. YT is definitely not on the level.

There is a proper team out there somewhere that could continue the legacy the way it was meant. Sadly this is not it.

@@hardcutreviews I think that the studio should continue with Venkman, Spengler, Stantz and Zeddemore, by making the next sequel an animated film instead of live action. If they chose the right style of animation it could work, and we'd be back with the characters that we know and love. The story could be set in the past, with the characters still in their 30s and 40s. If it works it could open the doors for a whole series of animated sequels starring the original characters.

@@ghostbusterscollector8593 Would love that.

​@@ghostbusterscollector8593 A good premise in theory, but my concern would be that because it's animation, it would repeat the same mistake that has been made since GB2: tailoring it for kids. The 1984 GB wasn't made for kids. A lot of the OG's humour is adult, with notable sexual innuendos and subtext (Keymaster and Gatekeeper) that passed over our heads as kids, but adults understood immediately and giggled in response. Not to mention the GB's were a bunch of down-to-earth, boozing, smoking underdogs , with Peter Venkman in particular being a fast-mouthed, womanising charlatan who's into ghostbusting predominantly for the fame and money ("The franchise rights alone will make us rich beyond our wildest dreams"). Making the franchise more kid -friendly has taken all of that realistic edge out that makes it appeal to adults. On a related note, I'm a major GB fan, but one thing I specifically dislike about the recent films is they are too cartoonish, largely because everything is made easier by CGI. The 1984 GB relied more on practical effects, which is more work-intensive than CGI, but grounded the film in reality. Even if you didn't believe in the supernatural, you could at least buy while watching the ghosts and monsters on screen were real supernatural entities interacting with our real world and, with the possible exception of Slimer, this made the ghosts scarier. Watching the newer films, at no point was I not aware the ghosts I was seeing were CGI creations and not ghosts that could plausibly interact with the real world. Because the ghosts and other supernatural entities look so cartoonish and unreal, I can't suspend disbelief enough to buy this is the real world this is happening in, as opposed to some cartoonish alternative reality. Now I'm an adult, that really doesn't appeal to me and I worry an animated film could just put another nail in the coffin of a franchise I love.

@@Hypestrike1 I agree with everything you've said. There hasn't really been a good Ghostbusters film since the original, and a major reason for that is because every film since has been primarily geared towards a child audience. Consequently, a lot of the humour and horror has been watered down and weakened. If an animated sequel was to happen, it should be geared towards an adult audience. They need to recapture the look, tone and feel of the original, but they'd need to use the right style of animation and write a damn good script. I think it could be really good, provided they have the right approach.

You take that back.

Bustin’ hasn’t felt good for some time now.