It was hilarious. My man showed up all well dressed, ready to face any difficult questions, only to end up saying the same thing over and over.

Maybe she wanted that. She phrased it differently hoping the jury is stupid and won't recognize it s as such, so despite asking the same question like 20 times she wanted to make it seem like she asked 20 different questions and since he can't answer it, she wants to make it seem like he has something to hide

They're desperate. They have nothing. It costs nothing to try, and there's all to gain if they manage to slip something under the radar. So they try, and try, and try again. Either it works or they lose nothing.

Yes she’s relentless

@@Mant111 it costs everyone's sanity lol

@@Mant111 only costs them their time allotted. So far they have 8 hours left while Johnny’s team has 18 hours.

it's actually not.

@@TheClandestineFox farcry reference

i thought that was stupidity

Ahh the famously fake Einstein quote that never happened.

They're actually asking the questions to make a point. The jury hears the question asked, and then hears the objection. Sometimes over objecting makes it look like you're afraid of what someone might say.

Agreed ugh

Totally.

Well it's actually kind of sad cuz their image are ruined and no one will hire them. They are just doing their job. But they had a choice to side with Amber so it's lowkey their fault. HAHHA

Please be kind to Elaine. She's doing her oathsworn duty to provide the best defense she can. It's not her fault that her client, Amber Turd is a guilty psychopathic liar.

I will hear it every night in my nightmares

I actually don't blame him. I stopped hearing Elaine like two days ago.

Waldman is a really smart lawyer. He knows that Elaine is full of shit

I mean by that point, we all got the gist

He's on a tightrope himself. If he fucks up and gives info he shouldn't, he can face severe consequences.

Ha! When the judge told Elaine "What if any ...is NOT a cure all" bubbles from my rosé went up my nose I was dying.

I hope I never hear that phrase ever again.

😆😆😆

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

She just learned that one from Ben chew just a couple weeks ago and this was back in February

And then decided it would be a good deposition to include to support their case!

One bonus is it ate up some of their time. Wouldnt it be funny if there is a wonderful person on the stand that they cant cross examine - because they ran out of time due to having other witnesses that were pointles!

Well look who hired her. They're all crazy.

Hey , i don’t really know a thing about law, can you explain what is attorney client privilege ?

@@_moro_4992 An attorney cannot reveal any information their client told them nor any information/documents produced in the course of them working with the client. Unless the client willingly waives their attorney client privilege. Since JD didn't waive his privilege, the attorney has the right to not answer any question that might interfere with that attorney client privilege. It is pretty common that when an attorney is called to be a witness, they have another attorney to advise them on what not to say, like in the video.

Well this was for a purpose of doubts, she knows she is not getting anything out of him, that wasn't the point, no one expected him to confess to this whether it's true or not. The point was to let the jury know they could be hiding something. They couldn't do anything else there and they HAD to bring him in since they are suing johnny back over this guy's statement so this was a mandatory witness for them. By the way, their lawyers are not bad, there's no miracle lawyer. Their client and main witness on a stand blames them for hiding evidence, she changes her story so many times over various trials and interviews and such that it doesn't match anymore, her witnesses also have holes in their stories and contradict each other's stories. You could switch lawyer teams between them and Camille wouldn't do much better. Even good clients with truth behind them can be difficult cases, in this case I don't know where the truth is but I for certain can tell the client is constantly pushing them over an edge. Let's be real here.

She's one of the best in her field actually, she's an amazing lawyer. It's just really hard for her to defend someone who's clearly guilty, a stack of evidence pointing towards her client. She's a lawyer, but she was unfortunately hired by Amber in this case. To make it simpler for all the idiots trying to call her stupid: You think it's easy to even try to defend someone who's clearly guilty, with all the evidence pointing towards their client? I'd really, really love to see you try.

Yes, furthermore she has a doctarate in getting objected!

@@graceygrace2011 ahem ahem..she was

@@graceygrace2011 yes... Very unfortunate for her...

The jury already can't stand her and mostly her voice. 'what if any' my God!! 😅

I found out Mr Wallman's comments won't be considered his but Johnny's. The judge ruled on that today. It was stated in CourtTV.

And Rottenborn as well.

Its hard to defend a liar ...that's all 😀😀

@@gloriaa.garcia3985 what does that mean exactly?

She has sung...merry go round till her graduation 😂 n will carry to her grave 😂

Same🤣😭

First Camille an now this was even worst!!

Thanks

I actually think it's fuuny.

asking the same question repeatedly is literally all her team is capable of

I can picture her looking up to the ceiling and saying, "I'm trying" in futility.

She's like a vinyl record with a scratch

😂😂😂crying 😂 Lmao

Both sides, Johnny Depps Team and Amber Heards Team have a set amount of time in the trial. They're not "wasting" anyones time but their own. If they're out of time it's the end

Sun Tsu

@@Touay. Nah it's actually Napoleon

Don't worry i did it for him lmao

@@sylviagombedza7454 LOL HAHA ME TOO!!!

And the muffins!!!

And about the bottle

@@montagne5825 Yes!!

@@thelonecrow1300 Wait...the bottle? What did I forget?

Do you know the muffin man?

Possibly they think the jury may assume he is hiding something. They may be hoping to sow some doubt about JD.

@@andrewwilkins7823 That’s possible but not likely. The asking lawyer knows that the judge will actually SUSTAIN the objection. It is improper to ask an attorney about any conversation they had with the client (subject to very few exceptions that don’t apply here). There was no really valuable purpose for asking the attorney any questions. Period. Not in this case.

Since she is a bad lawyer, she thinks everybody else is

I could have an equally bad job for ah as she is doing for a much lesser fee. And I am not even a lawyer. 😂

Look at what they have to work with. They're out of things to do.

A good attorney would.

You obviously a lawyer right? You have a law degree and access to the case theory? You know what a case theory is right? You understand that Heard's lawyer is doing this for a reason right? I mean you are not just some fan of Depp's whom has become a lawyer overnight - through KZfaq? Right?

I read this in Samuel L Jackson's voice and it was hilarious.

I agree with you Kerwyn

@@SI-qp7cm every attorney who has credible background that have talked about this says this was a terrible move by Amber's team. She's done. Deal with it. Edit: Aww, Samuel got triggered by my comment. You're on YT, find a lawyer on YT who is religiously covering this trial that says this was a bad move. Or you can continue to move the goal post as you have been w/ everyone. The hilarious part is, you fail to reveal why this was bad for Depps team. Jury reports are terrible for Amber, and when they choose to not use jury instruction, Amber is done. I bet you're the type of lawyer who puts "super attorney" on his resume 😂😂 Suck it up buddy. Your precious Amber will be okay, she will have lots of street corners to work from in Hollywood..

@@SI-qp7cm Hey guys!! We've finally found an Amber Heard Fangurl!!

They know what objection made by a lawyer is though. They also know that it isn't like pleading the 5th. If they don't know this then they shouldn't serve on a jury. I'm sure these instructions were given beforehand.

Yeah it does make it look like this guy is hiding things for not answering!

Apparently you've never served on a jury before. That's the reason that people serve on juries. So they learn the basics of how the court system works.

I heard that one of the jury members raised a eyebrow in a response that amber gave during her cross examination and that a couple of other jury's would look up at amber anymore durning her cross examination .

@@TrudyPatootie instructions are given at the end. You would know this if you were a 1st year law student or above.

😂😂yeahhhh

He isn’t getting blamed… it’s elaine who’s pretty dumb asking same thing over and over😂

sorry but im dumb af, why is that he can't answer?

@@jonathanfrechette2034 attorney-client privilege "A client has the right to refuse to disclose and to prevent any other person from disclosing confidential communications between the client and the attorney."

@@Reia.P ah ok i understand now tahnk you :)

He obviously has something to hide! Why wouldn’t he have answered any of these simple questions?

This is a trial for defamation, they would have to file for a new trial for assault.

@@MrCrazyGameGuy and I hope they do when they loose this one but I'd also understand if JD didn't want to do this...

Statute of limitations, unfortunately.

@@mathildes4494 he could’ve filed this suit for abuse from the start, but I don’t even think JD cares about the decision at this point, simply because he brought the truth forward and exposed amber for the turd she is. His name is more or less vindicated in the public court, which is what this suit was about mostly anyways.

Simple answer - Johnny Depp... Something Depp has said since this news first broke all those years ago... "I just wanted the marriage over, I wanted to protect Amber, I did not want her life being affected by our failure" - Even in his opening statements in this trial, he echoed that... He never pursued charges as he did not want to hurt her! And bringing charges would have destroyed her career. For all his faults, which Depp does have and has admitted to... He has been CONSISTANT in his testimony... He refused to press charges to protect Amber Heard! And yes, also now... The Statute of Limitations also kicks in... It has been over 6 years since the Op-Ed... And the alleged abuse took place before that!

@@reesedesigns lmfao... this reply had me cracking lmfao

in this part she is asking for a lawyer to violate client lawyer privilege. It's a lawyer 101 violation.

How is she a lawyer 😂😂😂

😆 🤣

If I'm not wrong both sides have to agree on what to remove and what to put in. Some of the previous objections were removed because they(either side) did not want the jury hearing the question/implied information. In this case they seemed to have just let it stay in because it meant nothing.

heard's side was trying to make it seem to the jury that info was being hidden from them but it looks like it backfired.

They get paid by the hour.

Both sides have to agree on what is admitted as evidence in any trial. If you were a defendant you wouldn't want the prosecution clipping out whatever they want from witness testimony without your permission. If they cut out all these objections it would seem clipped together and less compelling

Ever heard the saying “give someone enough rope?”

I think it's because amber has been lying to them about everything this whole time and they're just finding out some truths they didn't know. They didn't have time to prepare for rebuttal at all the other day with Amber's testimony. They were expecting it to be the next morning, then Camille stopped and there was a couple hours left, elaine HAD to do it at that time. It was an awesome cross exam but Camille that Elaine had not expected.

they are doing this on purpose.

There was a day where she would continiously forget to turn on the mic even after the judge explained multiple times that if she didnt do that then she can't hear her Also constantly repeating numbers of evidence wrong and asking multiple times.

lol

Yeah lol she’s thinking “The sooner this witch drowns herself, the sooner we all go home

This is what happens when you find your legal team at a strip mall.

@@carloscrecelius9597 strip club u mean... lol

She's getting paid either way so fuck it.

They have lost interest in AH CASE 😂 n they kno they lost it.

Drawn to crazy men are...at least short term

"she must be doing remarkable shit in the bedroom" yeah, uh about that-

@@ingenuity23 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🙈🙈🙈Stop it, please, you are killing me! I am meant to be working and at my lunch break! I have a feeling I will be late going back!

Sustained.

Overruled, keep on going. 😎

Stop stealing peoples comments and spamming everything. Boring.

Yes I started thinking it was just being repeated because it was all starting to sound the same. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

None of that has anything to do with the law and equating the outcome. Only evidence. Not feelers

she doesnt have to ask this questions, she ask them because she thinks this will affect the jurys opinion but i think is common knowledge that attorney-client privilege is an iron wall unless you have proper grounds to break it like money laundering for example, and the stuff they got in only makes amber look bad

@@gshimon I agree. The public at large has certainly seen enough TV to be familiar with the concept of attorney client privilege. In fact, I would wager the average person thinks it even extends further than it actually does. This is a bad gamble on the defense's behalf, thinking it will make Depp & Team look evasive... but on the other hand, their client has handed them such a shit case to work with, I don't know what they can do besides desperate gambles like this.

I think if she had done it better it could have looked evasive. But JD's lawyers said, "this would violate attorney client privilege we can't talk about that" solves most of that, especially after question 10 with the same instructions

If I were to guess I'd say the only reason they did this is for talking points later on 'Johnny and his lawyer refused to answer over 20 questions regarding.... that alone seems suspicious to me" and hope that it can be part of their 'tally column

With a jar of cocaine 🤣

🍷🍾🍷🍾 Bahaha! 🤣

I think it’s mostly her client is a pathological narcissistic liar. Must be awfully difficult, practically impossible to defend that machine of ever flowing lies.

You're actually right now that I imagine it. you got it in my next video

Oh no. Please NO music. That was super annoying.

Disagree, music was dope and I wanna know what track that was, legit!

Right 😂😂

But isn't that the point, the jury needs to start impartial obviously but throughout the trial they are to figure out which party is in the wrong. Though I guess for situations like in this video, these non answers and all of these questions are supposed to just be ignored, so in that sense I guess it makes sense that it would be difficult to not remember everything like this.

@@mrbomb1339 Right, but even after the jury picks a side, if there is still some trial time left, the jury needs to still listen to both sides and be open to changing sides. If the jury already makes up their mind before the trial is over, then that would make it difficult for them to choose which party is in the wrong. Basically, they should give each side a chance to redeem themselves even after they have picked a side.

Right! So why didn't she n doesn't she! That judge is just as dumb as these amblahh turd lawyers! Idiots!!!

I would be falling asleep by now.

It goes against AH time in the trial, so either they are padding the stats to make it look as if they have more than they show or its a hail mary to get anything to stick, or both.

Can you imagine how pissed off this makes the jury members, being forced to listen to this crap day after day. Think about how much lawyer nonsense could be eliminated if the jury had the power to say "We've heard enough, guilty".

Career doomed n respect buried 😂. It's insanely difficult to live with imbalance people. M dealing with my husband for divorce who is more psycho than AH n he thinks he is right n tries to prove it but left all alone. My kids chose to live with me.

Nah...many men like crazy women, they don't care and they will pay - example Elon Musk, how could he even date her - mature man with plenty kids....many men just want one thing. Only a few - example Kevin Costner who rejected her would say no. She got men to pay some of her charity pledges but refused to release the money to the charity - I don't think she will ever pay it - she will take another man to pay it off for her.

The girl fucked up a relationship with 1 of the richest guys in the world. She might be conniving, but she doesn't really think things fully through.

@@geetamandavkar9791 gosh, how's it going now?

@@bigbrain4071 my daughter is earning bread and it's emotionally draining as I lived with this horrible person for 23yrs n have filed divorce from last 2 years. He left home n left her helpless. V struggled a lot to survive n my family didn't supported us even morally. Indian law is stressing n goes for years n I can't afford best lawyer. Karma will bury him 1 day. Thank you so much dear 🙏😊.

sure but you know what would of been just as idiotic? JD's team calling Elaine to the stand and asking her questions. lol...

She should be careful not to look even more incompetent

@@kimberlybrown5348 The reason she keeps asking questions she knows will get objected to is because it makes it seem like Depp is trying to hide something.

You forgot #amberturd

Imagine if after this, Johnny started his own company and filmed his own Pirates of the Caribbean? Oh i guess he couldn't because disney/groomers/wicked (flip "Disney" in disney font upside down) owns the copyright. Darn

kindly add amberturd

Won't happen. There is not an actress in Hollywood that dense who could pull off the "entitled KAREN" card thank God.

😄

"I accept the instruction".

😂 "like a like a goddamn cereal killer" 😂😂 yes

Maybe Elaine was counting on Amber being a better actress.

Source for the jury comment?

Tbf elaine was asking the same question over and over again. Asking the same questions and her “what if anything” are her specialty

For me is both

You can watch the trial with commentary from actual lawyers on "Emily D Baker" or "Legalbytes", they explain all that. To ask these questions over and over and get the objections was a tactic to bring this tape in front of the jury to make it seem like team Depp is hiding something. In reality the lawyer cannot say anything, because conversations between lawyer and client are protected.

She absolutely knew. It was a tactic to make the jurors think that JD and his lawyers are hiding something. It is considered to be very unethical in the field of lawyering.

@@anthill1510 Thanks for the informative reply. 👍 😀

@@christijohnson2320 Good point. On such a public case, If I were Ambers lawyers, I'd be careful of risky lawyering. But it's entertaining, so they can keep up the show! 😀 🍿

@@christijohnson2320 exactly, she is doing it intentionally.

Lmao

He couldn't answer the question because she kept asking the same one over and over just wording it different after it had already been objected.

The law says the privacy between a lawyer and their client is protected. Even though Waldman isn't Johnny's lawyer anymore. He still can't be forced to violate Johnny's privacy.

Cool.... i'm learning a lot abt court proceedings with this JD vs. AH

so she could speak indirectly to the jury by asking questions that she knows can't be answered. she's trying to put ideas in the jury's heads

Elaine may not get work after this. Time for a career change.