Sir, thank you for your work, systematic teaching is really needed in our generation and I deeply appreciate and respect what you stand for...please don't stop, I'm learning deep things from you. (from South Africa)

Thank you so much for taking the time to share with us these wonderful detailed and concise studies.

Another great teaching!

Great stuff. Thank you!

Dr Solberg thank you for your tireless efforts!! Blessings upon you, your wife and your children. I ask God to keep you and yours. God Be with you!

I really enjoyed that 😊

Another great video! Thanks again for all your comprehensive videos.

Amen and great teaching. I really think you are very respectfull, loving and gentle in your way to reach the Torah keeping people. I have heard and seen many onthers who make fun and speek in a disrespect tone and that is not loving as Jesus teaches us. So I really enjoy your videos and your loving way of teaching. Keep doing that. Don’t get down on the same sad level as others in here… It’s so sad How people forget to love eachother the same way as Jesus.. Jesus our savior bless you and your work ✝️🤗

Very good video. What I do like is your adding of some additional information and context surrounding the passage in Jeremiah. Too often, the focus is in Hebrews and misses some context. Unfortunately, as much as the added context is important and beneficial, I still feel it might lack in a couple area that the objectors will raise or will underlie in their presuppositions. First, more/additional context is needed establishing that Jesus has initiated/established the New Covenant (last supper). One objection I often hear is that Hebrew Roots believers say they believe all the Jeremiah prophecy is still in the future (not yet part of already but not yet nature of the Kingdom of God). Of course, they have to reinterpret or in some cases cast away what the author of Hebrews rights. Most often I see they arguing that Hebrews author is also speaking of future not present. They do the same with Isaiah's prophecy (some versus about the messiah and some about 2nd coming -- within same section). While it is true that some prophecy has a future and future-future sense, I don't believe Hebrews can be interpreted as all still in the future. The second, more subtle presupposition, is due to denial of Trinity, their is a lack of understanding of how Jesus has to be Yahweh otherwise his sacrifice could not have met the requirements of the law and fulfilled the punishment for sin so that our sins will be remembered no more. The believe that Jesus was a created agent and not God (Trinitarian view) leads to the believe that the New Covenant is still future also and why the Old Covenant is still in affect. This has been debated for centuries, but going back to an old recent debate, the debate with James White and Michael Brown had with a Sir Anthony Buzzard and Joseph Good on the Trinity really deals with the issues. Joseph Good is the foundational scholar that most of the current "elders" in the Hebrew Roots movement point to. Buzzard and Good's argumentation can be seen repeated in current modern debates like between Anthony Rodgers and Sean Griffin and the most recent between Andrew Schumacher and Sean Griffen. Sean basically is repeating the arguments (not as successfully) of Good and Buzzard. White's recent debate with Universalist Dale Tuggy covers similar grounds. The point being if the presupposition is anti-trinitarian, then what you presented here will not be believed. Your presentation here is very in depth but starts with a trinitarian and new covenant was established by Jesus position. It would be good to flesh out what those are solid underlying presuppositions.

This was a really great video! Thank you for your teaching!

You really hit a home run with this video. Good information.

Amen

Appreciate your clear teaching.

Which laws is God saying he will put in their hearts? The 10 commandments ( love your lord with all your mind, & soul and second love your neighbor as yourself)?

💯

He is writing the law, Torah, on the hearts of Israel and Judah. (Jeremiah and Hebrews) Everyone else is blessed to be a part of it. A good bible study will show he did not throw away his people. In their Israel and Judah's disobedience, he is using heathens to make them jealous so that they will return to him.

idk if you interact with your comment section much but firstly, thank you! I've dealt w Hebrew Israelism (the much more aggressive, racist, hateful branch of Hebrew Roots Movement) for years and have refuted their teachings almost on my own studies the exact same way you do (nothing like a cult to make you read your bible), so I'm binging your content out of relief and joy haha. #Subscribed So far you've covered almost every important, common point that I personally have interacted with concerning Hebrew Israelites (HIs). I just have one request concerning Sabbath that I haven't found in your content yet...and that's certain claims & rationales Jesus uses when challenged on the sabbath. I'd just like your take on my thought process on the passage(s) and the passages themselves. Feel free to respond in the comments or make a vid; I'm here for it either way! God bless and shalom. The talking points are usually something like "Jesus never encouraged, hinted at, or broke sabbath day observance (or any Mosaic law). He didn't work on the sabbath, and if he 'broke' it, it was merely tradition he broke. If he did break one of God's laws he cannot be sinless". Lots of HIs are anti-tradition. ---In John 5, the offense seems to not lie in the healing but in the carrying of the bed. The man is "carrying a burden" which seems to be in direct opposition to Jer 17:21. Jesus ultimately gets confronted and his rationale/defense is the bc the Father is working he is working. "Working" is the same word as the LXX translates from Ex 20:10 "but the seventh day is a Sabbath to the LORD your God. On it you shall not do any work (ergon)". Jesus seems to be doing one the common patterns of intensifying the charge. His rationale essentially means "The Father is breaking the sabbath therefore I do to, bc I am equal with him" He seems to appeal to his deity to supersede the command (after all, YHWH issued it and is above it). Moreover he hints that the Father has BEEN working until this point in time, which, in my opinion, further implies the future sabbath rest with no end, spoken of in the creation account. --In Matt 12/Mark 2, it could be argued that the gathering of grain was similar to the breaking of Jer 17:21 and Neh 13:15, but I've heard it more in line with breaking Pharisaical tradition, so we can roll with that if you want. Jesus' response was that "David and those with him broke it and it was okay. The priests themselves work on the sabbath and it's okay. Both groups are guiltless." Many liken the disciples' being hungry and therefore eating plucking grain to David's starving and being chased situation to explain why Jesus is saying they can break the sabbath, which I feel are incongruent, in all honesty. It actually feels more like gathering stick to cook bc you're hungry than David's dire situation, in my opinion. The common thread, here, seems to be related to the idea of serving God as a "priest" in some fashion. Those of God in Israel were supposed to be seen as a "nation of priests", meaning David in some capacity was excused as a priest for his faith and priestly shadow (like the linen ephod). The Levitical priests were excused bc they're serving God in the temple per God's decree. And those who follow Messiah are seen as priests as echoed by Peter, Revelation, and more explicitly in Hebrews 13:10 "We have an altar from which those who serve the tent have no right to eat". Since Christ is the temple believers serve in as priests, their work is as God commands it, when he commands, much like the earthly levitical priests. I think this is why he alludes to being greater than the temple in Matt....but I can't quite figure out what "the sabbath was made for man not man for the sabbath" namely the "...man for the sabbath" part means nor how it plays into the overarching flow of thought in Mark. I also don't quite understand how "I desire mercy not sacrifice" plays into this either, but it obviously plays into the temple somehow, I think. I guess it would be important to qualify or clarify what "lawful to do good on the sabbath" means too...He then concludes the first encounter in Matt with "the son of man is lord over the sabbath" which is a trump-all authority card that doesn't seem to warrant explaining. --I figure whatever clarity we gain from these passages can be applied to other "sabbath challenge" passes, unless I've missed some other important line of logic that isn't self-evident elsewhere To summarize, the points I raise in both these passages is that Jesus seems to play INTO the accusation (breaking sabbath), not DENYING it, saying he's working like the Father is or implying that even though he breaks it, he and his disciples are guiltless, like David and priests. In both examples he appeals to authority: one to the Father and being his son, the other to himself as the lord of the sabbath. I just dont follow the line of argumentation/rationale/defense 100% clearly esp when he references mercy>sacrifice and "man not being made for sabbath"...I noticed that the word "unlawful/not lawful" is not the same word used by Peter in Acts 10:28, if that matters at all. The "dilemma" for the position I hold is this, according to the HIs: he couldn't have broken it (like actually broken it, not merely some tradition) because he wouldn't have been sinless. If he did break it (like actually break it) then he wasn't bound by the Mosaic covenant while he walked earth pre-death, which makes me have to qualify other verses that I'm sure you're already thinking of....I think I tend to the latter since we've already established that, even though the disciples didn't get it, he taught all foods were clean while alive pre-cross...at least that's where I am right now... If you read this, I apologize for being unclear or confusing if I have been, but I'd be sooo grateful for your input on this as I've been contemplating making some kind of playlist to refute common Hebrew Roots talking points and misused verses (it's swept a lot of men and women of color away from the truth). You exegete in similar fashion to me and it would be a blessing to get your thoughts. Peace and love, man

I feel Holy Ghost on me when this brother teaches

Thanks!

Torahists don't seem to comprehend that the Author/Husband of the Mosaic covenant died, leaving Him free to marry another.

Thank you. This video helped me to keep in my faith in Jesus Christ. So much stuff online and social media to target Christians to lose faith. I have a pretty solid background and I almost fell off. I got kids. I cannot lose my faith.

Both of the covenants are made with ethnic Israel only as they are the only house hold that God chose out of all the world, but the new covenant through Christ Jesus our Lord invited Gentiles into the household more freely through faith in the done work of Jesus Christ than the invitation to the gentiles in the old covenant by Moses through works commanded to be done by Faith looking forward to the work of God in the future.

Hey Rob, do you have any social media I can talk to you on? I have lots of questions about Hebrew roots and your view also. If not that’s okay. Thank you! -Durst

Hello professor, can you explain the method of salvation for the gentiles prior to Jesus? For example, Ruth, Rahab, Caleb, etc. Would it have been the same or would there be a different method of forgiveness? To clarify, I mean if the Israelites’ sins were forgiven when they sacrificed animals, would the requirement for the sins of gentiles would have been sacrifices too?

Owe no one anything, except to love one another, for the one who loves another has fulfilled the law. The commandments, “You shall not commit adultery; you shall not murder; you shall not steal; you shall not covet,” and any other commandment, are summed up in this word, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” Love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore, love is the fulfilling of the law. Romans 13:8-10, NRSVUE Do we then nullify the law through faith? No! On the contrary we uphold the law. Romans 3:31. "If you love me you will keep my commandments " John 15:14 I did not come to abolish the law and prophets but to fulfill it. Matthew 5:17. He said to him, “‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the greatest and first commandment. And a second is like it: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets.” Matthew 22:37-40, NRSVUE Things that can’t be fulfilled in love can’t be from God, because God is love. (1 John 4:8) This calls for endurance from the saints who keep God's commands and their faith in Jesus. Revelation 14:12

Hello, if I may ask a question, if someone asks to be saved and continues to practice a sin (pornography, or drugs, or adultery, etc..) not stumble with sin like someone who is trying but messes up, is the person practicing sin truly saved? Like are they saved by Grace, or is faith without works dead, or did they not actually mean it when they asked to be saved?

Hi Rob... I see the new covenant speaking to regeneration not glorification, and that is one of the many reasons I believe the prophetic fulfillment is completed at the return of Christ when the elect nation of Israel is restored to God. Blessings

Jer. 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD: The version you study says "like" The Bible says "according to" H5921 al, and is used throughout the old Testament. I challenge you to find one other mention of H5921 al, where it could be reasonably appropriate to render that word as "like" in translation. If Jeremiah meant like he would have used: H251, 1571,1819, 1821, 1823, 1825, 1922, 2088, 2421, 2654, 3644. 3651, 4911, 4711, 4915, 5973, 5974, 7737 Heb. 9:12 Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us.13 For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh: Matt 26:28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins. According to the blood of sacrificed bulls to the covenant at Sinai, according to the blood of Christ for the new Covenant. Not according to the blood of bulls, but according to the blood of Christ. New does not mean different. If YHVH wanted Jeremiah to tell us he was going to make a different covenant, novel from the first, he likely would have used H1278 beriyah or it's root H1254 bara. Only by context in Hebrew are we given a clue to the intent of the author. As you already pointed out in this video, Same words written on parchment, now written on our hearts. Not most or some of YHVH's words, and not his words with many or few changes. Not these words of YHVH on these people, and those words of YHVH on those people, those things are all imagined by the hearts of men. Here's a shadow picture you may have missed from the Old Testament: Exodus 34:1 And the LORD said unto Moses, Hew thee two tables of stone like unto the first: and I will write upon these tables the words that were in the first tables, which thou brakest. The same words that were on the first set of tablets. He did not say well let's leave out that second one because obviously you people were not able to keep that one. God doesn't change, you are trying to separate God from Jesus from the Word, that's unbiblical. I would break down and dismantle your every little thing in this video, but your whole starting point is faulty. God doesn't change Keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ. Peace

Keep in mind that the seventy weeks were determined upon "thy people and thy holy city", and that by the end of the seventy weeks, the city and the sanctuary would be destroyed. This was fulfilled in A.D. 70. We are not waiting today for the temple to be rebuilt today, simply so that it can be destroyed, as it has already happened! Also, by the end of this period, the 'sacrifice and the oblation' (Dan 9:27) were to cease. This, too, was accomplished in A.D. 70. We are not waiting today for the sacrifices to start again, simply so that they can stop, as this has already happened! In further confirmation, Daniel 9:24 lists six specific things that would be accomplished by the end of this period, all of which have been fulfilled. In confirmation of the fulfillment, it reads, "Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to:" 1. "Finish the transgression," - This was fulfilled. (Luke 11:47-51; Matt 23:29-32; Matt 21:33-45) 2. "Make an end of sins," - This was fulfilled. (John 1:29; Matt 1:21; Acts 10:43; Hebrews 9:26) 3. "Make reconciliation for iniquity," - This was fulfilled. (II Cor 5:18-21; Hebrews 2:17; Col 1:20; Romans 5:10) 4. "Bring in everlasting righteousness," - This was fulfilled. (Romans 3:25,26; Hebrews 9:12; II Thess 2:16; II Cor. 9:9) 5. "Seal up vision and prophecy," - This was fulfilled. (Hebrews 1:1-2; John 1:1; II Peter 1:19-21) 6. "Anoint the most holy (or holy place),"- This was fulfilled. (Matthew 3:15-17; Luke 4:18; Acts 4:26,27; 10:38) Interestingly, Christ, in response to the question of how many times a man should forgive his brother, responded by saying, "until seventy times seven," which is the exact amount of time in Daniel's seventy weeks. (490) The implication being that there was an end to Christ's patience with His nation. Christ fulfilled the covenant that they broke well over 490 'times'. That is not necessarily to say that Christ was saying after 'seventy sevens' we should not forgive, but that, simply, "seventy weeks (were) determined upon (Daniel's) people." Therefore, we can see that the desolation of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 fulfilled the prophecies of Daniel chapter nine, against the perverse generation that rejected the Lord and his Anointed. Christ judged the nation with desolation and took away the kingdom of God and gave it to a nation bringing forth fruits (Matthew 21:43), which is the nation of believers (Christians). The "days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled" spoken of can be no other than the fulfillment of Daniel's seventy weeks with the Desolation of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. Therefore, the desolation of Palestine in A.D. 66-73 was the fulfillment of Daniel's 70th week, and the end of any temporal 'Nation of God'.

Hey Rob. I have one question. Why does James specifically call out to the 12 tribes of Israel in his opening statement? The reason being is many would say this is the church but isnt that a poor interpretation? Hes quite direct. My assumption is hes addressing the literal tribes which were scattered abroad. I thought this identity was lost for hundreds of years at this point.

Always points back to the law - because the law is light and is good for converting the soul. Jerimiah 31 33“But this is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the LORD. >>I will put My law in their minds and inscribe it on their hearts.

Very protestant teaching

Question: There are 24 instances of ESV of the word commandments in NT, and often we are called to keep God’s Commandments. What are those commandments being referenced? Sincere question.. not a gotcha trying to keep things straight.

40:14 hahhaa Planes Trains and Automobiles... filmed right here in Gowanda! There is a deeper meaning behind the modes of transportation used, there are a lot of videos I've put out that explain why. The path goes in both directions 'up' or 'down'... and the reason it is thru the desert is because of the mode of 'learning'... it don't matter if you 'know' the Lord or not... He 'knows' you... cause He does ALL THINGS (Isaiah 45:7)

Also, is there a difference between the remnant of Israel and the church?

Thank you for dismantling Dispensationalism

46:48 yep, it's weird, it's like you always got to spin it at the last second. Misrepresenting syncretism in Colossians is not honest... that verse directly connects to acts 15 which I will be giving a sermon on in a few weeks. Anyways, just got word Myles is interested in the debate. Hoping you will join him and Sam in the live debate against me. It will either be at his dad's Church (extremely liberal SDA branch), or his alma mater.

Around the 35-36 minute mark, you mentioned that the new covenant is unbreakable. That sin cannot even break the new covenant. Does this mean that one can hold the belief of once saved always saved regardless of how much one sins? I ask this in light of Hebrews 10:26 and 1 Corinthians 5 and Church discipline described in Matthew 18.

The transition period of the "last days generation" was AD 30 - AD 70. What was temporary - physical: 1. The Old Covenant written on stone. 2. Physical kingdom: the Law, the Temple, the Priesthood, National Jews and Canaan. What is eternal - Spiritual: 1. New Covenant - written on the heart, a Spiritual kingdom, the Gospel. 2. The Church, Christ, Saints, the Word, Life and Heaven

""Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come:" The statement "this world" or "this age" was in reference to the Old Covenant age world which had not yet ended, and the statement "that (age, world) which is to come" was a reference to the New Covenant age world, which would abide and follow the end of the Old Covenant age world. The "Last days" in Scripture, therefore, never apply to the Christian age, but always to the closing period of the OC Jewish age, which ran from the His earthly ministry to the fall of Jerusalem in the first century during the Parousia, in 70 A.D. - Fulfilled.

Somebody Has To Die by kimartist Somebody has to die before you can remarry into another family. Somebody has to die before you can inherit their estate. Somebody has to die before you can be "born again" into a new body. Somebody has to die before you can "resurrect" into eternal life. Somebody has to die before you can be permanently forgiven for everything for all time. Somebody has to die. Somebody did die. Somebody died. Somebody. Jesus. You.

Ezekiel 37:24-28 (ESV): 24 “My servant David shall be king over them, and they shall all have one shepherd. They shall walk in my rules and be careful to obey my statutes. 25 They shall dwell in the land that I gave to my servant Jacob, where your fathers lived. They and their children and their children’s children shall dwell there forever, and David my servant shall be their prince forever. 26 I will make a covenant of peace with them. It shall be an everlasting covenant with them. And I will set them in their land and multiply them, and will set my sanctuary in their midst forevermore. 27 My dwelling place shall be with them, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 28 Then the nations will know that I am the Lord who sanctifies Israel, when my sanctuary is in their midst forevermore.”

04.10.2024 Brother Solberg, thank you for teaching the TRUTH of God's Word. Very much appreciated.👑👊 Although, I do wish I had a dollar for each time you put on & took off your glasses.🤣

The covenant between God and man has always been the same. It has always depended upon God and not upon man. In Gen. 3:15 He alludes to the ministry of Jesus. In Genesis 15 God walks between the animals that had been cut in two by Himself, signifying that He was the only person upon which this covenant depended. In every instance when God interacts with man the presumption was that it was impossible for man to save himself--God had to save him. This is even true in the Mosaic covenant because God made provision in this covenant for atonement on a regular basis. All of these covenants are different perspectives on the same truth: man cannot save himself and God has a plan to save him!

It’s simple: 6:23 Jeremiah 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my TORAH in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. Yup…doesn’t say My NEW Law or SOME of My Law or MOST of My Law as if He has divided house And just like the OT it remains for ALL who reside in Him Numbers 15:29You shall have the same TORAH for the one who acts in error, whether he is a native-born Israelite or a foreigner residing among you. 30But the person who sins defiantly, whether a native or foreigner, blasphemes the LORD. That person shall be cut off from among his people. Makes sense as His are a blessing to ALL people and His House a House of prayer for ALL nations.

What about the crusades and Ethiopia being wrote out the Bible

When you give wedding vows you are declaring I will love you whether you are sick or healthy rich or poor it is a declaration saying I will love you and there's no conditions it's a promise not a contract not a covenant which would be for me to say I will love you if you do this or don't do that

There is nothing new about the renewed covenant. Same Torah with a few minor changes. They are; Sacrifice which changed from animal blood to the blood of Messiah. Circumcision went from flesh to heart The High Priesthood went from the family of Cohen to Yeshua after the order of the Mekek Zedek or Melchizedek. The renewed covenant in no wise made Torah obsolete. Its now written on our hearts and we keep it not as works, but as LOVE for the gift of Calvary. Doing this pleases the Father in heaven. The renewed covenant is based on better promises. Truth is, Grace PLUS Torah. Christians need to kearn this and start teaching keeping Torah in love and applying it with grace of Calvary. Read the book of Hebrews. Truth 101!!

Is the new covenant for the church or just Israel?

YOU MUST MAKE A CHOICE WHO TO SERVE AND WHO TO FOLLOW IF YOU WANT TO SERVE LORD GOD YEHOVAH THE MOST HIGH, SERVE YEHOVAH THE WAY YEHOVAH HAS COMMANDED TO BE ACCEPTABLE IF YOU ARE NOT READY TO SERVE YEHOVAH THE TRUE GOD THE WAY HE HAS COMMANDED, GOD SERVE YOUR IDOLS. WHY SHOULD YOU DECEIVE YOURSELF What is the use of claiming to serve and worship the Lord God Yehovah the God of Abraham if you are not ready to leave your idolatrous and abominable and ungodly traditional believes and practices to follow the way of Yehovah by his word, law, commandments and ordinances the way Abraham deed as commanded by Lord God Yehovah the most high ? 1 Kings 18:21 ASV And Elijah came near unto all the people, and said, How long go ye limping between the two sides? if Jehovah be God, follow him; but if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not a word. Joshua 24:14-25 ASV Now therefore fear Jehovah, and serve him in sincerity and in truth; and put away the gods which your fathers served beyond the River, and in Egypt; and serve ye Jehovah. [15] And if it seem evil unto you to serve Jehovah, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were beyond the River, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve Jehovah. [16] And the people answered and said, Far be it from us that we should forsake Jehovah, to serve other gods; [17] for Jehovah our God, he it is that brought us and our fathers up out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage, and that did those great signs in our sight, and preserved us in all the way wherein we went, and among all the peoples through the midst of whom we passed; [18] and Jehovah drove out from before us all the peoples, even the Amorites that dwelt in the land: therefore we also will serve Jehovah; for he is our God. [19] And Joshua said unto the people, Ye cannot serve Jehovah; for he is a holy God; he is a jealous God; he will not forgive your transgression nor your sins. [20] If ye forsake Jehovah, and serve foreign gods, then he will turn and do you evil, and consume you, after that he hath done you good. [21] And the people said unto Joshua, Nay; but we will serve Jehovah. [22] And Joshua said unto the people, Ye are witnesses against yourselves that ye have chosen you Jehovah, to serve him. And they said, We are witnesses. [23] Now therefore put away, said he, the foreign gods which are among you, and incline your heart unto Jehovah, the God of Israel. [24] And the people said unto Joshua, Jehovah our God will we serve, and unto his voice will we hearken. [25] So Joshua made a covenant with the people that day, and set them a statute and an ordinance in Shechem. Deuteronomy 13:4 ASV Ye shall walk after Jehovah your God, and fear him, and keep his commandments, and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him.

@35:39 it's impossible to break this " New covenant " because it's not a covenant it is a promise from God to keep our end of the covenant which we break. A covenant is like a contract that is two-sided we're both parties have an obligation to perform or provide specific things in order to have a deal with each other to have relationship with one another in good standing. A promise is a one-sided declaration saying I will do this in a promise does not have conditions. And that's why it's impossible to break this " new " covenant because it's not a covenant and a failure for us to distinguish between the two can cause confusion and deception and misunderstanding

If God has two different plans for Jews and Gentiles today, why does Peter & Paul, in the first century, say there is no longer a distinction? Acts 10:34 Then Peter began to speak: “I now truly understand that God does not show favoritism, Acts 10:43 To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins. Romans 10:12 For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. Galatians 3:28-29 28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. Colossians 3:11 11 Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.

4:18, you drop the phrase "they inherited the curses" and just move on, but those are troubling words

If God writes his Torah on our hearts and Jesus says that nothing from the law will pass until all is fulfilled. And if not all things are fulfilled yet doesn't that mean we're still supposed to obey the Torah? Jesus life death and resurrection isn't a fulfillment of all things is only the fulfillment of redemption we're still waiting for the fulfillment of restoration and so the Torah is still to be followed and obeyed no? Cuz I'm getting confused cuz some videos are saying that we don't have to keep kosher and some videos are saying that the toilet is still to be followed and I'm perceiving contradiction so I'm just trying to clear it up

Which other covenant cancelled the prior one? Did Noah’s cancel Adam’s? Abraham’s cancel Noah’s? Moses’ cancel Abraham’s?

1 Peter 1:9, 2:25 First to the Jew, then to the Gentile. (Fulfilled & constantly growing)

Jeremiah 7:20... what we do, as we are dust, IS the fruit of the 'ground'. Recall that Jesus said He came to start a fire and wished that it had already been kindled. All of what we do is tested in the fires of TRUTH of God's word. And though all a persons works might be burnt up, from that fire will come what is redeemed, even the man, though all his works be burnt up. The man himself will be saved, as if escaping by fire. That 'lake of fire' that y'all are looking for? You're standing on it. Welcome to the world of the fallen. Guess who your father is? Start a war between a father and a son, be reborn in the spirit, that you might serve God - instead of the flesh. There is no such thing as 'lawlessness' as all are under the law (Romans 2:12-14). You can 'run'... but you can't 'hide'. 😉

Jeremiah 31:33-34 (ESV): 33 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 34 And no longer shall each one teach his neighbor and each his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the Lord. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.”

Hebrews 10:16 This is the covenant THAT I WILL ( future )make with them AFTER THOSE DAYS (Post Gog and Magog ), saith the Lord, I WILL ( future )put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds WILL I ( future )write them. Note: Hebrews was written after Christ's ascension by Paul or whichever disciple that the book of Hebrews was scholarly ascribed to. There has to be a similar future event of Exodus 24, and the scripture confirms that in Jeremiah 32:37- 44. FYI, sacrifices continue during the millennial reign of Christ on earth, with Christ himself erecting the temple for his father - Zechariah 6:12!!!

I would like to start by saying remember that when we stand before Jesus (Yahusha) (Yeshua) Our High Priest and Teacher He will know how well we love one another;and did we obey His Commandments. To the best of where my understanding is in my walk as I walk out my faith with fear and trembling. Will I fail yes, we are all sinners but we are to be a bride who has made herself ready. My pastor back in 2006 ish at Lighthouse Bible church taught me something very important "don't be a baby bird and take what any man feeds you. The Bible and your digging in study's with the Holy Spirit (Ruach Hachodesh). I don't debate to Torah or not to Torah, The Father either guides you that way or He doesn't. Heck I was a pretribber in my thinking at the Lighthouse but now I am not in the way the pretribbers understand the scripture. I have a different perspective from the wisdom God has given me. I can't change a pretribbers mind. Much less can I change one's mind to understand that a Christian is graft into becoming Israel (Ephesians 2) citizen. Walking out what Jesus taught and the Appostles walked out as well. I don't keep the commandment to tithe because I am not under the Law. Yet I tithe as one under the Malki Zedeck Priesthood. No one has been under the Law since Christ death." Death do us part" as we say in weddings. This is why the Jews aren't covered in leprosy. But in the New Covenant (renewed like a New Moon) but built upon the Rock Yeshua. As I continued to read and test each side of arguments I would seek the Holy Spirit and the Spirit sent to teach us teaches me by seeing the scriptures in a perspective of the heart ❤️ And to read in context with scriptures to back as witnesses. Take the infamous (Colossians 2:16) Therefore due to vs 14 sin, curse and death being nailed to the cross, Don't let the Talmudists judge you on how you keep the by what you eat. (If you wanna eat Hover Hog you go ahead but God lays us out a diet plan that is healthier.) Since eating God's heart way of me eating I have lost 50 pounds. Was worth giving up bacon, catfish n shrimp. God does everything for a reason. And even Noah knew what animals were clean and unclean. The story of Noah we grew up with was the first lie of the enemy the Bible straitened out. Learning 7 clean animals entered the ARC not 2. How you keep the Feast (this verse is not talking about bringing in pagan holidays) But about how the Talmudists, Circumcision group judge how you keep the Feast. I keep His Feast not a a Levite or a Jew but as a follower our High Priest Yahusha. I keep Passover as a remebrance. I drink from His cup of wine in honor eat some grilled lamb with bitter herbs and gather with Family. Easy I give up bread for tortillas and crackers for the week of Unleavened Bread. Not because the Law but because it pleases my Husband. His 10 Commandments please Him when followed. I don't need to argue the Law to know it doesn't please Jesus for me to get a tattoo. In fact I have gone through the 613 and most don't apply because of the change in Priesthood, and the in the Land ones. So it all comes down to standing before Jesus one day and saying. I don't keep your Shabbat because..... And here is the Word to back it with 2 witnesses. I don't want to have a healthy temple for the Holy Spirit so I am going to eat whatever because now even skunks are deemed clean to eat. And Jesus I know from reading that the early church kept your Feast days and not Christmas and Easter and some Halloween/Fall fest. But you know my heart in celebrating your birthday worshipping you how I see fit. I decided to change and walk the way our Messiah walked.

I cant remember if you ever got into hebrews 8 and 9. We disagree about the application of the law, but i would like to add that the most significant change from the old to the new was that Jesus became the high preist in the order of Melkizedek. This is significant because Jesus was not a levite. The preist hood changed to Jesus, the one with no end or begining. Because of his sacrifice, which was once and for all, has no need to be done again as in the human preisthood. Jesus has risen defeating death. This is why he will always be our high priest, he is not limited by death. The new covenant is different in the the preist, the temple, and the sacrifice are all in Jesus. The system is still in place, its just satisfied in Jesus. Hence not one letter of the law willpass away. Interestingly, scripture also calls us a preisthood, a temple of the spirit of God, and romas encourages us to be living sacrifices. All this to say, yes, the new covenant is indeed new and different, but the requirement of the law is still intact. I can understand the confusion, especially in regards to sacrifice. But these things solidify the truth that Jesus is indeed God. If he wasant then the new covenant would not be.

You have to keep the commandments of God given by Moses, and that's the way you show love for God

THE DIFFERENT BETWEEN THE OLD COVENANT BETWEEN THE FATHER AND THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL , AND THE NEW COVENANT BETWEEN THE FATHER AND THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL . EXODUS 20:1-19 , 1.And God spake all these words, saying, 2I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. 3Thou shalt have no other gods before me............................................. 18.And all the people saw the thunderings, and the lightnings, and the noise of the trumpet, and the mountain smoking: and when the people saw it, they removed, and stood afar off. 19And they said unto Moses, Speak thou with us, and we will hear: but let not God speak with us, lest we die. BECAUSE THE PEOPLE WERE AFRAID TO HEAR IT FROM THEIR HUSBAND OF FAITH , THE WORD/MELCHISEDEC ( WHO WOULD COME IN THE FLESH AS JESUS CHRIST ) , THE INSTRUCTIONS WAS GIVEN TO MOSES , TO GIVE TO THE PEOPLE ; SO MOSES BECAME THEIR EARTHLY HUSBAND . UNDERSTAND , THE ATONEMENT FOR THE PEOPLE HAST ALWAYS COME THROUGH THE LAW OF A HUSBAND , UNDER A PRIESTHOOD : HEBREWS 7:11-12 , 11.If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? 12For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law. WHEN THE PEOPLE REFUSED TO LIVE BY FAITH ( MELCHISEDEC PRIESTHOOD ) , IN ORDER NOT TO KILL THEIR FLESH/BODY , GOD GAVE THEM THE PRIESTHOOD OF WORKS ( LEVITICUS ) , THROUGH THEIR EARTHLY HUSBAND MOSES . MOSES WAS A FLESH & BLOOD MAN AS THE HUSBAND ; JESUS CHRIST BECAME THE HUSBAND WHEN HE WAS BACK IN THE FAMILY OF GOD . HEBREWS 5:9-10 , 9.And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him; 10Called of God an high priest after the order of Melchisedec. MOSES = LEVITICUS PRIESTHOOD = ATONEMENT FOR THE FLESH/BODY OR EARTHLY BODY = WORKS OR LAW OF ANIMAL SACRIFICE = NOT OF FAITH = NO PROTECTION FOR THE HEAVENLY BODY = STILL IN SIN BEFORE THE FATHER = LAKE OF FIRE . JESUS CHRIST = MELCHISEDEC PRIESTHOOD = ATONEMENT FOR THE HEART/SPIRIT OR HEAVENLY BODY = FAITH OR BLOOD OF CHRIST THROUGH REPENTANCE AND BELIEVING THE GOSPEL = OF FAITH =PROTECTION FOR THE EARTHLY AND HEAVENLY BODIES = CLEARED OF SIN BEFORE THE FATHER = EVERLASTING LIFE . THE WRITER OF HEBREW 8:6-13 , IS QUOTING THE PROPHET JEREMIAH 31:31-34 . JESUS CONFIRMED THE NEW COVENANT WITH MANY ( ELECT/SAINTS/144,000 ISRAELITES ) IN DANIEL 9:27 ; NOT THE ENTIRE NATION OF ISRAEL UNTIL HE RETURN TO SETUP HIS KINGDOM FOR 1000 YEARS . ROMANS 11:7 , What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded . ROMANS 11:25-28 , 25.For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. 26And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: 27For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins. 28As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes. EZEKIEL 20:30-38 , 30.Wherefore say unto the house of Israel, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Are ye polluted after the manner of your fathers? and commit ye whoredom after their abominations? 31For when ye offer your gifts, when ye make your sons to pass through the fire, ye pollute yourselves with all your idols, even unto this day: and shall I be enquired of by you, O house of Israel? As I live, saith the Lord GOD, I will not be enquired of by you. 32And that which cometh into your mind shall not be at all, that ye say, We will be as the heathen, as the families of the countries, to serve wood and stone. 33As I live, saith the Lord GOD, surely with a mighty hand, and with a stretched out arm, and with fury poured out, will I rule over you: 34And I will bring you out from the people, and will gather you out of the countries wherein ye are scattered, with a mighty hand, and with a stretched out arm, and with fury poured out. 35And I will bring you into the wilderness of the people, and there will I plead with you face to face. 36Like as I pleaded with your fathers in the wilderness of the land of Egypt, so will I plead with you, saith the Lord GOD. 37And I will cause you to pass under the rod, and I will bring you into the bond of the covenant: 38And I will purge out from among you the rebels, and them that transgress against me: I will bring them forth out of the country where they sojourn, and they shall not enter into the land of Israel: and ye shall know that I am the LORD. THE STRANGERS/GENTILES HAST ALAWAY BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE FATHER THROUGH FAITH ( OBEYING HIS WORD ) ; STARTING WITH ADAM , BUT ISRAEL IS THE ONLY NATION UNDER HIS LAW . THE NATION OF ISRAEL IS THE ONLY NATION THAT HE HAST GONE INTO A COVENANT WITH ; WHICH IS AN AGREEMENT TO KEEP HIS LAWS . ROMANS 2:11-15 , 11.For there is no respect of persons with God. 12For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law; 13(For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified. 14For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves: 15Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;) EXODUS 12:49 , One law shall be to him that is homeborn, and unto the stranger that sojourneth among you. THE LAWS OF THE FATHER DOESNOT CHANGE ; THE CHANGE IS THROUGH THE HUSBANDS OF THE COVENANTS , THROUGH THE PRIESTHOODS . UNDER THE HUSBAND MOSES THROUGH THE BLOOD OF ANIMALS THROUGH WORKS . UNDER THE HUSBAND CHRIST THROUGH HIS BLOOD , THROUGH FAITH ; WHICH IS REPENTING AND BELIEVING THE GOSPEL . YOU CANNOT COME UNDER CHRIST BLOOD , UNTIL YOU : MARK1:14-15 . SHALOM !

Why do you people keep saying They COULD NOT , they would not , big difference. You speak as if GOD gave us laws that are impossible to keep.

There are multiple covenants mentioned in scripture. 1. Covenant of Noah (Gen 6:18), a promise that God will never cause a worldwide flood. 2. Covenant of Circumcision (Gen 17:10), a promise to multiply Abraham's offspring exceedingly. This is an everlasting covenant according to Gen 17:13. It can only be broken individually by not being circumcised (Gen 17:14). 3. Covenant with Isaac: Promised before Isaac was born that through this lineage the covenant will be established as an everlasting covenant. 4. Covenant of Sabbath Keeping (Ex 31:16): It was established as a sign between God and the children of Israel as a sign that they might know that YHWH does sanctify them (Ex 31:13). 5: Covenant to do marvels (Ex 34:10): God promised to demonstrate his power before all the earth. 6: Covenant of Moses (Ex 34:27): Moses wrote down the words God spoke to Israel on tablets. Israel swore to keep them. It's not really a new covenant (in the sense of those given to Abraham, Isaak and Jacob) except for the idea that Israel tied themselves with an oath to these commandments later that will bring blessings if they obey and curses if the disobey. There are laws given by Moses to the people of Israel to regulate their daily life which are national laws. Many of these commandments, that Moses wrote down, don't apply for all the people in the world. However the commandments given to Noah apply for all the people and he already knew how to differentiate between clean and unclean animals although it is not clearly stated if that meant unclean animals could not be eaten, this was only established for the Nation of Israel. To honour the Sabbath is also not a new part of the Mosaic law but given before, it is a separate covenant with the people of Israel. In the Mosaic law Israel was given special instructions on how to keep the Sabbath that don't apply to Non-Jews, however it doesn't mean that this day should not be honoured. Changing the day of Rest from Saturday to Sunday was a decision made by the church which had more to do with paganism than with Christianity. The new covenant that God is making with Israel is not an abolishment of the previous covenants. It is a covenant to write the Torah into the hearts of the people of Israel. The covenant that was broken is the covenant the people made in the desert to keep the commandments. Again, it is not an abolishment of the commandments, but that God will write these commandments into their hearts. Jesus reinforced the Torah in Matthew 5, that until heaven and earth pass away not even the smallest letter will disappear from the Torah. He who teaches it will be called great, he who doesn't will be called the least in God's kingdom. Teaching the Torah is what even Jesus told his disciples to do as a good thing. Yet the church today seems to think that it is a bad thing.

Matthew 28:19 (NLT): 19 Therefore, go and make disciples of all the nations,

A testament and covenant are absolutely not the same things despite the poor translation from diathēkē

New covenant,, new peoples. Same terms.

What is the change? I don't see any change in the law from old and New testament what I see is Christ in the apostles teaching the truth about the Torah and giving us the right understanding of the Torah and us being given God's holy Spirit and the Torah being written on our hearts and minds enables us to have discernment and to be able to properly apply God's laws but what I see Jesus and the apostles teaching isn't new with their teaching is is exactly what I see Moses teaching. For example the Pharisees saying why do your disciples eat with unwashed hands, and then it being said it's not what goes into the mouth that the files a person but what comes out of the mouth. This is not a new law it's not a new concept what it is is Jesus is giving the proper teaching of the law giving the proper understanding and application and differentiating between laws that applied to the physical man and laws that apply to the spiritual man

The Unconditional New Covenant depends on a love of God and Gods righteousness, and the condemnation of Adam is only forgiven by judgement. Nothing to do with the Cross, which made Jesus our Judge, witnessed by the Spirit those who transgress Gods laws are counted unbelievers and return to condemnation. Of course it is always past sins of those reconciled into the church of God at baptism. There is no more available of atonement by sin and sacrifice, no more hypocrisy as law breakers must be admonished from the church.

The New Covenant is the marriage covenant. Ephesians 5:31-32 It has no last days or end times. The OC did.

Hebrews 10:9-10 (NLT): 10 For God’s will was for us to be made holy by the sacrifice of the body of Jesus Christ, once for all time.

The New Covenant = The New Heavens and earth, wherein righteousness dwells. The Church is God's masterpiece. Daniel & Revelation have been fulfilled. Christ in you is the "good land" the tabernacle of God among men.

God spoke His Son be born save the world in Genesis. Where man sin

If Jesus is the expected messiah of the TeNaCh, he has to fulfil the messianic prophecies. So far he hasn't any of them and Christians hope he will do it on his second coming. He did however in my opinion fulfil the prophecies in Isaiah 53 as the suffering servant. As king of the Jews Jesus was the first of many brethren to suffer the wrath of Rome when he was crucified which eventually led to the two thousand years of persecution of the Jews culminating in the Holocaust (which actually means burnt offering). Israel is because of the Holocaust, a burnt offering or sin sacrifice, the full fulfilment of the Suffering Servant prophesy, that it became a nation again. Who was and is responsible for this Sacrifice? It is this replacement theology that is at the heart of this hatred of the Jews that made this sacrifice possible. Because of our, the nations, transgressions the suffering servant was bruised but we, the nations, thought that it was the fault of the Jews themselves. They were blamed for killing Jesus when in fact it was the Romans who crucified him. A king stands for his people and the reason Jesus was crucified was not because of any religious accusations like Blasphemie, he was crucified because he was a rival king to the Roman authorities. Rome would never tolerate a rival king unless they appointed him. Jesus wasn't appointed to be the king of the Jews by Rome but by God Himself and the people. He was preaching the kingdom of God and calling Jews to repent from falling away from the Torah. He himself embodied the Torah fulfilling everything that was expected by it. Through faith in Jesus and making him our lord, the Torah will become flesh in us through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. We know we're saved when we have a love for the Torah. This doesn't mean we have to abide by everything that is written in it, because this is solely reserved for the Jews, the Nation of Israel, but we should abide by the Noahide laws, of which some of the are mentioned in the book of Acts, since these laws apply for all people. Because the Torah is written in our hearts we are guided by the Holy Spirit how to live by it. Nobody need to be taught by others how to keep the Torah because we all are taught by God Himself.

He taught and demonstrated the New Covenant BEFORE He christened it to a room full of Jews then signed it with His blood sealed it with His death Heb 9:16-17 is clear a testament only goes into effect after the testator is dead Confirmed Gal 3:15 no changes after Is why we must live as He did says 1 John 2:6 and “love as I have loved you” JUST AS Our standard for living is established PRIOR His death and not by subsequent teaching and or later practice which came decades even centuries AFTER…by man and his traditions

The only aspects of the Old Covenant that have been made void are the animal sacrifices because of Jesus becoming the substance of them, and the promises for the Jews due to their self righteous mentality in violating the terms and conditions of the covenant. The terms and conditions of the old and new covenant are exactly the same, obedience by faith and not by self!

The conditional covenant that Jeremiah is talking about is the same covenant that God made with Abraham and his descendants which if we are believers in Jesus we've been grafted into that family tree we've been adopted into that descendancy. The covenant had conditions which we broke and got forew that we would break and God promised in the days of old telling us you will not fulfill these conditions but out of his mercy and grace and love he will not only keep his end of the covenant but he will take responsibility for our end of the covenant we will not obey those conditions and keep our end of the deal but God says I love you so much that I will keep your end for you in the New testament or New covenant is not something new it is just the fulfillment of that promise that was made in ancient times. Just as the restoration of Israel which we know is scattered throughout all nations to this day when that promise is fulfilled it is not something new it is not a new promise or a new deal or a new contract if you will it is the fulfilling it is the keeping of the contract that was already made from the beginning just as the new moon is not new in the sense that God doesn't take away the moon that existed and put a new rock there at least this is how I understand the text if anyone would like to expound on this or correct it or give their understanding if it's different or whatever contribution after all are we not all seeking truth

Defending the Biblical Root is like defending the indefensible. "It is by faith we trade a cow for magic beans & thereby ascend to heaven." Bovine 3:21 It is amusing to hear the profound arrogance of someone knowing of God, as if He were known outside of fiction. The believer & the literate are separated by the vocabulary of fiction: Blasphemy, God, faith, prayer, prophet, etc. Matthew 17:20 He replied, “Because you have so little faith. Truly I tell you, if you have faith as small as a mustard seed, you can say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move. Nothing will be impossible for you.” I like asking believers how they can possibly think their faith is respectable, given Jesus said faith is worthless, since you can't expect obedience when ordering mountains to move? Freud wrote, "The antidote to Christianity is literacy". Blasphemy is a fiction vocabulary word. Blasphemy is a victimless crime. Believers have a profound lack of quality-control, so we are to pretend their God made Mormons so Christians would know how Jews feel. Like Book tag

King James Bible Luke 21:22 For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled. (This includes Daniel's 70 weeks) New King James Version For these are the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled. New American Standard Bible because these are days of punishment, so that all things which have been written will be fulfilled. Here's the bottom-line, dear Brother or Sister, in the Lord: Every constituent element of eschatology, 1. the kingdom, 2. the judgment, 3. salvation, 4. coming of the Lord, 5. resurrection, associated with the consummated End of the Age, is inextricably, inseparably linked with the judgment of Old Covenant Israel, in 70 A.D. - Fulfilled 20 centuries ago.

I can save you 48 minutes. He has not a clue about why the new covenant was needed or what it will bring, So if that's what you were looking for you will not find it here. He does do a fair job at explaining that there will be one though.

The covenant between G-d and Israel is frequently referred to as everlasting (e.g., Genesis 17:7, 13, 19; Psalms 105:8, 10; 1 Chronicles 16:13-18). The Christian position concerning Jeremiah's covenant is the complete opposite of what the Jewish Scriptures teach. Hebrews 8:13 states: "In that he says, a new covenant, he has made the first obsolete. Now that which is being made obsolete and growing old is near to vanishing away." In stark contrast to this statement, the Scriptures state: "The works of His hands are truth and justice; and His precepts are sure. They are established forever and ever, they are done in truth and uprightness" (Psalms 111:7-8); "The grass withers, the flower fades; but the word of our G-d shall stand forever" (Isaiah 40:8). Jeremiah's "new covenant" is not a replacement of the existing covenant, but merely a figure of speech expressing the reinvigoration and revitalization of the existing covenant. The people of Israel possess an old covenant yet a new covenant, truly an everlasting covenant. Jer. 31:31-34 The first thing you note is that the covenant is explicitly with Israel and Judah (verse 31)-with Jews not with gentiles! So whatever else it is, it is not a new religion that is meant to spread across the world. In verse 33, we see that the Law, apparently the ancient Law of Moses, will be “put within them and written in their hearts.” So it does not involve an abrogation of the old Law, but a new and more profound commitment to it. The new commitment will be so deep that, metaphorically speaking, every word of the Law will be written on the heart of the Jew. As a result of this, “I will be their G-d,” there will be no more idolatry amongst the Jews, “and they shall be my people,” there shall be no doubt about the special relationship that He has with this nation, no more thought of some other group taking their place. In verse 34, we find that in the era of this new covenant, there will no longer be a need for one Jew to teach another the ways of G-d, for they will all be profoundly knowledgeable about and committed to Him. This plainly has not yet happened.And the dude here did not read this verse, otherwise he would be in trouble! Finally, also in verse 34, we see that in the era of the new covenant, all the sins of Israel will be forgiven and forgotten, presumably as a result of the new absolute devotion of the Jews to G-d. So no dead man on a cross needed ! Again, the fact that Jews still suffer, both individually and collectively, indicates clearly that this has not yet happened. But Christians read things into the Hebrew texts that were not there and sometimes we even see it in Christian translations where certain words are chosen to make their special interpretations possible. 30. Behold, days are coming, says the Lord, and I will form a covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, a new covenant. You can think that this is about your New Testament but just read it. What does it really say? It is about a covenant with Israel and Judah not Christianity, nor Christians nor Gentiles! With the Jews. You have nothing to do with that covenant! Of course Christian teachers and theologians interpret it and tell you what it is supposed to say, but it doesn't. 31. Not like the covenant that I formed with their forefathers on the day I took them by the hand to take them out of the land of Egypt, that they broke My covenant, although I was a lord over them, says the Lord. Christian teaching: the forefather are the Jews the people taken out of Egypt and this text from Jeremiah speaks to Christians? But hey guys wake up, this text was written for the Jews about their situation of the time, it mentions their forefather the previous generation, these were not the forefathers of the Christians and Jeremiah was not written for Christians. 32. For this is the covenant that I will form with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord: I will place My law in their midst and I will inscribe it upon their hearts, and I will be their G-d and they shall be My people Again he speaks to the people at the time renewing their covenant there and then not prophesying about the future. "The house of Israel" and "the people" is not about Christians today it is what is says: the people of Israel and its leaders of the time In the Ancient Near Eastern world a covenant was instituted by taking an animal and sacrificing it, then splitting it into two. The two members of the covenant would pass through the pieces saying, "If I violate the terms of this covenant, you can do to me what we did to this animal" (see Genesis 15:9-10 and 17-18 and Jeremiah 34:18-20). Whenever an English translation has the phrase "Make a covenant," in the Hebrew the text literally says, "Cut a covenant." (ancient-hebrew.org/articles_covenant.html) When G-D "cut a covenant" with Israel at Mount Sinai, they were bound to the terms of that covenant, which was that the people would obey G-D's teachings (The Torah) and HaShem would protect and provide for them. However, Israel disobeyed this covenant and G-D "Spit them in two," by dividing them into two nations, Judah and Israel. While most Christians will claim that the "First covenant" was with Israel and the "New covenant" was with the Gentiles, this is incorrect as Jeremiah 31:31 clearly states, "I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah. How can the Book of Hebrews radically change Jeremiah’s prophecy to be understood that G-d had somehow “discarded” His covenant with Israel, when Scripture repeatedly states that G-d’s unique relationship with the Jewish people is bound in Heaven and can never be destroyed or amended? Moreover, Jeremiah exclaims the Lord’s reaffirmation of His eternal covenant with the children of Israel: Thus says the Lord, Who gives the sun for light by day and the fixed order of the moon and the stars for light by night, Who stirs up the sea so that its waves roar - the Lord of hosts is His name: If this fixed order were ever to cease from My presence, says the Lord, then also the offspring of Israel would cease to be a nation before Me forever. Thus says the Lord: If the heavens above can be measured, and the foundations of the earth below can be explored, then I will reject all the offspring of Israel because of all they have done. (Jeremiah 31:35-36) Jeremiah’s prophecy of an eternal Jewish people presents the Church with a serious theological problem because the New Testament went to great lengths to undermine the Jewish sacred texts. In fact, the author of Hebrews deliberately changed the words of Jeremiah in order to reverse the prophet’s original message. How can the author of Hebrews change the word of G-d in order to persuade readers of the authenticity and superiority of Christianity? Furthermore, in contrast to the message of Hebrews 8:13, the life-giving commandments of the Torah have no expiration date. Moses declared that these commandments are eternal. The secret things belong unto the Lord our G-d; but the things that are revealed belong unto us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this law. (Deuteronomy 29:28 [29:29][/29:29]) The works of his hands are verity and judgment; all his commandments are sure. They stand fast forever and ever, and are done in truth and uprightness. (Psalm 111:7-8) Moreover, the prophets foretold that the Jewish people will observe the commandments of the Torah after the messiah arrives. In fact, the Jewish Scriptures prominently testify that the faithful observance of the Torah will be the emblematic feature of the messianic era. And I shall give them one heart, and shall put a new spirit within them. And I shall take the heart of stone out of their flesh and give them a heart of flesh, thatthey may walk in My statutes and keep My ordinances, and do them. Then they will be My people, and I shall be their G-d. (Ezekiel 11:19-20) My servant David will be king over them, and they will all have one shepherd.They will follow my laws and be careful to keep my decrees. (Ezekiel 37:24) And many peoples shall come, and say: “Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the G-d of Jacob; that he may teach us his ways and that we may walk in his paths,” for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. Who, in reality, diligently and joyfully adheres to these life-giving precepts? The faithful remnant of the Jewish people - the nation that utterly rejects the core teachings of Christianity- BARUCH HASHEM . Yeah Iam a proud ANTI -CHRIST and my devotion goes to the one and only creator of this world , the KING of KINGS -ADONAI .

That second coming was in the first century. It's not in our future. Please, check what I'm saying: Matthew 10:23; 16:27-28; 26:63-64 Luke 21:22 Acts 1:11 Romans 13:11; 16:20, 1 Corinthians 7:29, 2 Corinthains 5:16 Galatians 5:5 Philippians 4:5 1 Peter 4:7, 4:17 James 5:8-9 Hebrews 10:37 1 John 2:18 Revelation 1:1, 3, 7; 22:7, 10, 12, 20

Visible signs of the new covenant? .......The new sign of the new covenant will be: 1. when the house of Israel and the house of Judah are regathered together in the land (this happens at the resurrection/Messiah’s return) 2. When he puts his Law within them and writes it in their hearts. (The new body they receive at the Resurrection) 3. They no longer will have teach each other the law , saying, ‘Know YHVH,’ for they shall all know Him from the least of them to the greatest. (At the resurrection) 4. He will remember their sin no more (sin is taken away at the resurrection unto eternal life in their immortal body) 5. The great city will be rebuilt. (This is the new Jerusalem that comes down from heaven.) Those are the signs of the New covenant. Jeremiah 31:30-40 Ezekiel 37:26, Ez 37:1-28

Jeremiah points to JESUS... Jehozadak!! Jeremiah says people will no longer talk about Jehovah who took his people out of Egypt and settled them in Canaan (Jesus Nun), instead people will call him Jehovah who gathered his people from all the lands (Jesus son of Jehozadak). Jeremiah predicts a Branch will be raised up to David, but tells us that Jeconiah will have no children. Jeremiah tells us the name of the Branch will be Jehovah is our righteousness. That is the meaning of the name Jehozadak. Jehozadak mean "Jehovah is righteous." Brenton's English translation has it plainly, Josedec, right there in Jeremiah. So Jeremiah is building a bridge between the first Jesus (Nun) and second Jesus (Jehozadak). Zechariah makes this clear. Don't let it bother you if you notice Zerubbabel is always mentioned before Jesus Jehozadak, because that also happens to Jesus Nun, who is always mentioned after Eleazar. Does anyone think Eleazar is more important to Jesus Nun? He is even absent as Jesus Nun has the Levites carry the ark across the Jordan River. Ezra places himself in the place of Jesus Jehozadak, compare his genealogy to Jehozadak's in 1 Chronicles 6. Then Ezra dissolves marriages, beginning with the sons of Jesus (son of Jehozadak). Nehemiah rebuilds the walls of Jerusalem and has the Levites march around them to celebrate. That is the inverse of Jesus Nun's conquest of Jericho. Nehemiah even mentions Jesus Nun in chapter 8. In chapter 13 Nehemiah chases the descendants of Jesus (son of Jehozadak) out of positions of power. Jesus son of Nun killed the king of Jerusalem, hung his body on a tree, took his body down at evening, put the body in a cave, and rolled large rocks in front of that cave. Jesus Jehozadak faced Satan, had his dirty rags replaced with clean linen, just the opposite of what happened to Jesus of Nazareth. There are at least 50 items in the 16 chapters of Mark that are directly from the three Jesuses of the Old Testament. I think the first "New Covenant" is probably the simple flying scroll of Zechariah 5.

*Solberg!! Why the manipulation?? why are you quoting only half verses ??? There is a condition to the curse in Deuteronomy 11 !!* 28 and the curse, if you do not listen to the commandments of the Lord your God, but turn aside from the way which I am commanding you today, [w] *by following other gods which you have not known.* *You are just another example of how Christianity misuses God's true word !!*

This pteacher is confusing his listeners. His shallow understanding of the law makes him confused which law has been nailed on the cross when talking of burnt offering sacrifices. His explanation about God that remembered our sins no more, the reason that the ten commandments are no longer binding is a great deception. His interpretation to the word of God is guided by the devil who is the father of lies. John 8 :44, because he is lying by saying no need to keep the law of God. 1 John 2:4. That is why Satan is trying his best to look for his human agents to preach and teaching people break the law of God because he is enraged against God's commandment keeping people. Rev. 12:17.

If you get Baptized you receive God The Holy Spirit. You exit The Old Testament and enter The New Testament . Jesus is the way , the truth , and the life. Jesus is the light to guide your path. Then Jeremiah’ prophesy becomes reality. No Baptism means no salvation.

just wanted to clarify that everybody knows Jews don't eat pork... certainly civilized cosmopolitan well mannered Greeks did...and now that Greeks are believing "what to expect from them?" was the Acts 15 council what believing and well intended Greeks did NOT understand is that not only can A) clean meat be made unclean is WHY 1) nothing strangled 2) no blood 3) nothing offered to idols but what these believing Greeks had to come to learn was that B) even in CLEAN meat there is still UNCLEAN parts which is WHY James expected the reading and preaching of Moses every Sabbath continuing... Gen 32:32 "Therefore to this day the Israelites do not eat the tendon attached to the socket of the hip, because the socket of Jacob’s hip was touched near the tendon." I guess one could be cynical that it was a big "use only our kosher butchers" racket but well...there were plenty other reasons the world hates His people...doing His ways...

How do we know biblically that the Lord Jesus did not have long hair? 1 Corinthians Chapter 11, v.v. 12-15... 12 For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman; but all things of God. 13 Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered? 14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him? 15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering. Samson had long hair (as other Nazarites did) because God instructed them to grow it as such. Similarly, the 2nd commandment states no engraved images, yet when commanded directly by the LORD, Moses, et. al. made engraven images. So, unless the Lord spoke to you directly (and there are no Nazarites today BTW), a Christian man is shamed if he has long hair!

Faith without works of the law of God is dead

OK in addressing the commentary in reference to what they're trying to allude to the covenants!? Are and were only for the nation of Israel only All 12 tribes, they're not for the rest of the nations of the world!? And the Savior ( YAHAWASHI) who they Ignorantly call Jesus Christ the Son of (YAHAWAH) who they Ignorantly call God did not come to incorporate a universal acceptance or inclusion of the covenants!? Psalm 147:19-20 KJV He sheweth his word unto Jacob, His statutes and his judgments unto Israel. He hath not dealt so with any nation: And as for his judgments, they have not known them. Praise ye the LORD. The laws, statues and commandments will only be for the 12 Tribes of Israel Not and Never for the Nations of the world or anyone or any other nation of people, that would choose to think they have the abilities lto be joined to the covenants of The Heavenly Father YAHAWAH through the Savior YAHAWASHI who is the representation of the almighty God YAHAWAH!!? No other nation of people or individuals can be grafted into a bloodline that they did not originate from and that's point blank period and a fake Jesus did not come to change or bring the covenants to the rest of the world!? 1 Corinthians 10:1-5 New King James Moreover, brethren, I do not want you to be unaware that all our fathers were under the cloud, all passed through the sea, all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea, all ate the same spiritual food, and all drank the same spiritual drink. Hebrews 11: 1 Paul I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin. Romans 9:4 “Who are the Hebrew Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, YAHAWAH and the promises;” The Savior YAHAWASHI didn't come to offer salvation to the Whole World, He was only sent to the lost sheep of the House of Isreal!? He can't CHANGE THE HEAVENLY FATHER'S MISSION OR PLAN FOR THE DELIVERANCE AND SALVATION OF THE HEBREW ISRAELITES!!!

The new covenant was available from the garden of Eden. Genesis 3: 15. (referring to Jesus). Renewed to Abraham..Genesis 15: 4-5 (speaking about Jesus). At Mount Sinai the Israelites tried to do it without Jesus. Exo 19:8 All that the Lord hath spoken we will do. It is called the new covenant because it was not ratified with blood until Jesus shed His blood. It is impossible to be saved without being born again. Even in the old testament.What did Jesus say about those who tried to enter without Him? Joh 10:7 Then said Jesus unto them again, Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the sheep. Joh 10:8 All that ever came before me are thieves and robbers: but the sheep did not hear them. Joh 10:9 I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture. To say people were saved by keeping the law is a nonsense or by sacrificing animals. All the sacrificial sevices did was point the people to Jesus who was to come. They could only be obedient with divine aid, the same way as us.

So what law Gid give tovhis people isreal?

The law that they learned is from God not moses law? John1:17 for law was given by moses and the grace came by Jesus christ. God put his law in our heart .. and God he give his light or principles to isrealite, the same law he put in our heart.. God said I didn't come to destroy the law or phrophet but but to fulfill. He came fulfilled his principles ... Isaiah 8:20 to the law and to the testimony if they speak not according of this word its is because the is no light in them . .. and John 8:12 then Jesus speak again unto them saying I am the light of the world ,he that followeth shall not walk in darkness but have the light of life.

The Holy Scriptures don't teach one milligram of Christianity how can you defend something the scripture do not teach?

I would look positively at the entire book of Jeremiah... destruction is just 'constructive criticism' from God. Also, prophecy is not some 'divine weather forecast' they are 'commands' with (2) ways to fulfill them (was Ninevah overturned or is Jonah a false prophet?). If you do the 'works'... the prophecy is fulfilled in the way that you want it fulfilled, if you wait for God to do it... you might not like the way He 'works' and gets the job done. Welcome to the life and calling of a prophet and I've been burning myself out since 2020... and dang it all... no rapture during the eclipse. Shucks. I would suggest reading Jeremiah 18:7-10, and roll up yiur sleeves and get to work... and as Jesus suggested... ANYTIME will do. IF there is no faith in God's promises... it is certainly not He who has broken them - though broken they might seem. His promises CANNOT be broken... so when He says IF... back Him into a corner and wait and see IF they will be fulfilled. I'm going to say that if He is 'good' AND God... if we do what is right, we will be accepted. How did the Bereans 'test the scriptures daily' ? Simple. They 'lived them'. Reading about it accomplishes nothing, it is a form of godliness that has no 'power'. It is not the hearers OR the readers that honor God... but the doers... the SONS OF THE COMMAND (bar mitzvah). In the end they studied no war. Spolier... no people... no war. You have a choice of what to use your 'paper swords' for... farming or war... and why in the end, when the 'books are opened'... the laws will be writ on the heart as they should be, and you'll burn those weapons for 7 days. For the Lord has spoken.

God says His law is forever. Matthew 5:17-19. Numbers 15:15 says Jews and grafted in Grntiles share the same comamnds..... Jews/Gentiles are ONE. Galatians 3:28.... The DOERS of the LAW will be justified. Romans 2:13......See James 2.... I don't follow your theology of christ. For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. Matthew 24:24

Again you speak false doctrines, people who follow your doctrines you are sending them to hell salvation is not through just believing in Jesus read revelation 14 Vs 12

You really know how to butcher the word of God