It is very upsetting that fundamental differences are being raised on our beliefs. It is best that a shut down of all lectures is observed until these fundamentals have a consensus among the torch bearers of Sanathana Dharma and a collective and uniform announcement made on them. What is most dreadful is bad intentioned "scholars" of other religions like Zakir Naik and company will use this to their advantage and maximize the creation of disharmony among Sanathanis. People like Dhushyant Sridhar must discuss his book in detail with the current torch bearers of Sanathana Dharma including his own Guru, obtain their consensus and only then release his book to public. It is obvious he has not done that. I for one will not purchase or pass comments on the book for or against until the book has the blessings of *All* recognized scholars on the fundamentals atleast. I am glad that though I registered for attending his lecture in Singapore, I could not turn up. Perhaps it has been a blessing in disguise and that Lord Rama prevented me from attending it on purpose. I take it as HIS Blessing.
@VijayaLakshmi-tz6wd53 минут бұрын
Verygoodexplainilike
@loveisgodisСағат бұрын
Radhe Krishna!!! Sri Premikendra Sathgurunath Maharaj ki Jai.
@SRIDHARAN-w9fСағат бұрын
அருமையான விளக்கம் ஸ்வாமிஜி
@PVSNarayananСағат бұрын
Please invite Nilesh Nilkanth Oak who has different research model for Ramayan timelines (suggesting around 12906 BC), he also mention if there are new evidence and model, this date can be change further
@Prof.SURIYANARAYANAN.S-uo4js2 сағат бұрын
நமஸ்காரம். என் தகப்பனாரும் ராமாயண உபன்யாசகர் தான். Controversial மற்றும் சந்தேகத்திற்கு இடமின்றி சொல்ல வேண்டிய விஷயங்களில் பெரியவர்கள் மற்றும் hindu universities யிடம் consult செய்திருக்க வேண்டும்.
@MohanRamani-cv4ei2 сағат бұрын
Thank you sir ... for clarifying the actual facts. The so called Upanyasakars who claim themselves as Sanadhana dharmis who are actually half baked Pundits... they act as of they know everything.. the pseudo scholars have to be exposed. That needs lot of grit guts and clarity of thought... hats off you sir ... for all your efforts... 👏👏🙏🙏🙏👍🔆
@ananddevarajan21682 сағат бұрын
Dushyant ji. Gain many more years of age and gain humility and render valuable service to humanity .
@ramaprasad79093 сағат бұрын
I am very happy about Srimaan.. Rangarajan.. In the course in this present debates he had brought together all the learned scholars.. It us again a great service to Aasthikaas.. Hari Om..
@nbm18043 сағат бұрын
🙏Superlative enriching conversation.Apart from debunking the myths and false information propagated by pseudo scholars like Dushyanth Sridhar, this podcast has revealed a lot of authentic information on various topics from our Vedas and Scriptures hitherto unknown to many of us. Extremely grateful to you for arranging such enlightening knowledge sharing sessions with scholars from the Vedic Parampara.🙏
@ramaprasad79093 сағат бұрын
I am very happy that Sri Rangan swamygal has a very lenient view about Upcoming Young scholar Sri. Dushyanth ji To err is human and to surpass such mistakes is the expected generosity in spiritual persons.. Hari Om..
@SivakumarNarayanan3 сағат бұрын
இவ்வளவு அழுக்காறு ஒரு துஷ்யந்த் மேல் தேவையில்லை. பிராமண துவேஷம் இப்போல்லாம் சுயம்பு. கலி. பகவானே.
@vikramsrinivasan81763 сағат бұрын
Why Krishna Premi Swamigal 1 lakh times better than Carl Sagan? ========================================== Krishna Premi Anna defined Infinity!!! Yes Swamy did. Swamy said: "THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE INFINITY, MORE THAN ONE INFINITY MEANS BOUNDARY EXISTS. THAT WHICH HAS BOUNDARY IS NOT INFINITE" That INFINITY is EKAMEVA ADWITHEEYAM. Even ChatGPT agreed this is correct and said only for purpose of mathematical formula infinite set theory exists. Infinite cannot be put into a set correct? This is the reason I requested Rangan ji not to quote some x, y Carl Sagan .
@saraswathyshanmugam94163 сағат бұрын
உங்களுடைய விளக்கம் பெருமைக்குரியது. மிக்க நன்றி சுவாமி.🙏🙏
@srivathson70804 сағат бұрын
Exaclty.what swamy said about Dushyant about when he tells about hanuman's story . After hearing this..i totally STOPPED hearing on dushyant talks and resisted hearing any word from him. He is totally speaking out of sampradhaya.. SImply being silent, it does NOT mean that all the Acharyas and all the scholars accept his findings.. IT is their Compassionate character they are being pity on him.
@saraswathyshanmugam94164 сағат бұрын
Hare Krishna Hare Krishna Krishna Krishna Hare Hare Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare.🙏🙏🙏
எதற்கு இவர் 20 நிமிஷத்தில் ஜாதியை ஏன் கொண்டு வருகிறார்?? இந்த சப்ஜெட்டுக்குத் தேவை இல்லாதது. Not related to this topic. Unnecessarily he is dragging the issue. Not on to the topic.
@kora14335 сағат бұрын
அட. இடது தோளில் வஸ்திரம் வருவது போல் இருப்பது இப்போ சரியாக உள்ளது
@idhunamadhuulagam26325 сағат бұрын
புஷ்கர் பட்நாகர் 7k வருடங்கள் முன் என்று கூறுகிறாரே, அதை எடுத்து விமர்சிக்க வேண்டியதுதானே??!!
@username927074 сағат бұрын
பட்நாகர் திருமண் கடுக்கன்
@Jayanthi-sf6sp6 сағат бұрын
Hare Krishna. Thanks for wonderfull explanation. Our acharya srila Prabupad already gave order to HG Rasaraj prabu this order to combine with divine knowledge to now a days scientist thought and prove vedas. Prabu is a highest scientist. He started to give seminars recording this. Jai srila Prabupad.
@kannanramanathan71756 сағат бұрын
பெருமைகள் இருக்கட்டும் அது பகவான் க்கு சமர்ப்பணம்... பெருமை மிகுந்த பெரியவன் அவன் ஒருவனே....தேவரீர்🙏 தென்கலை வடகலை சண்டை நிறுத்த ஒரு அறிவுரை... 🙏3 பெர்சென்ட் மொத்தம் மும் ஒற்றுமையாக இருக்க வழி... எதேனும் ஐடியா pls 🙏👌🙏
@rubabu6 сағат бұрын
Suggest both spend time to watch nilesh oak you tube videos, looks like it went off the topic of ramayana dating
@Vvsn657 сағат бұрын
சில பேர் அடுத்த மதத்துக்கு பாடரவா,பஜனை பண்றவர், இப்பிடி போயிண்டு இருக்கா, அது போல இதெல்லாம் அவா தூண்டிலாவும் இருக்கலாம் நிறைய திரவியம்.
@srinivasankrishnan15957 сағат бұрын
துஷ்யந்த் கம்பரை போல மாபெரும் மேதை.நாலு வேதம்,Sanskrit முழுமையாக அறிந்தவர்,சாஸ்த்ரம், Upanishads,புராணம் கற்ற வேதக் scholar. கம்பரின் ராமாயணம் போல துஷ்யந்த் ராமாயணம் இந்த நூல். இவர் போன்ற இளம் மேதைகளை நாம் வணங்க வேண்டும். இவர் ராமாயணத்தை அனைத்து வைணவ ஆசார்யர்களும் வணங்கி அடிபணியவெண்டும் பல்லக்கில் துஷயந்தையும் அவர் நூலையும் வைத்து ஶ்ரீரங்கத்தில் ஊர்வலம் வந்து கோவிலில் அரங்கேற்றவெண்டும்.
@username927074 сағат бұрын
fake id pseudo ignore
@srinivasankrishnan15954 сағат бұрын
@@username92707 நான் நக்கல் செய்து இருக்கேன் சரியா படியுங்கள்
@srinivasankrishnan15953 сағат бұрын
@@username92707 நக்கல் செய்து இருக்கிறேன் சரியா படியுங்கள்
@AssyriaMenach7 сағат бұрын
I am truly amazed to see people still taking one DS so seriously. Who is he? An authority in Ramayana? The hell NO ! . He is just a media savvy person who is just interested in filling his pocket. As far as I am concerned, he is just a passer by dog who is barking. Should we care? Many like him in the past from various parts of India have also stated Ramayana as 7000 years prior to the present age. This is total BS. Just ignore DS. There are countless references in Valmiki Ramayana that point to a fully civilized society. My personal estimate is, 1.8 to 2 million years since the Ramayana age. Presence of four tusked elephants ( Gomphothere as per a Wiki link, this was extinct around 1.6 million years before), very tall humans, flying crafts of a different kind, rakshasaas who looked significantly different from humans etc all point to a time frame when those existed and that isn't 7000 years or 14000. VAARANISCHA CHATUR DANTANTHAI...PARVATHA PAKSHINO BHAVAT...... EKAAKSHEEM EKA KARNAAM CHA, ...... AKARNAAM SHANKHU KARNAAM CHA MASTHAKO.... THE SWAYAM PRABHA incident (space time distortion and teleporting) we can not reason based on our understanding of science today - the techniques were far superior, for example, flights weren't based on propulsion systems. In certain parts of the world, even today, there are reports of seeing similar weird creatures as in the above partial sloka. To make modern science popular, the vedic understanding of life and associated concepts have been *****heavily supressed**** to make people believe we evolved from stone age. Darwins theory of evolution will straight go to the bin if the truth emerges. Modern science cannot reason out many phenomena cited in vedic texts, for example, Newton himself in his Principia Mathematica clearly states that he does not know what causes gravity but the effects are covered. Many mathematical concepts including Fourier transforms and infinite series have been detailed by vedic mathematics in ancient times as slokas but that does not mean this is exaggeration or just poetry. A full dwapara has passed with 800,000 plus years. Now 5000 plus Kali years. Simple arithmetic should drive the point that it has been cose to 2 million years since Ramayana. In the age of Kali, people like DS are required because they will emerge as ambassadors of Adharma (initiation of cracks and once the propagation starts, the failure will follow, just similar to material failure) as clearly stated in Bhavishya purana. Also, the "BAHU KRITHA VESHAHA" in Baja Govindam is meant to cover people like him - UDARA NIMITTAM is the trigger. I am only worried about younger generation who would fall prey to these silly texts and 50000 years from today (say) Ramayana would read Rama kidnapped Mandodhari and find its place in a shelf with Tom Sawyer or Huckleberry Finn. Just wearing a namam or vibhoothi on the forehead doesn't mean much if practices aren't aligned. Not just DS, there is another noble soul from Maharashtra (see youtube) who is also claiming that Ramayana happened just 14000 years back. He just fell short of saying that he and Rama were classmates in a gurukula during treta yuga. I have quoted some Sanskrit words above in English- please excuse - i dont have the time to set it in Harvard-Kyoto or Devanagari. DS is BS. Nothing more. I had posted this in FB link earlier but had deleted it and posting it in a modified form.
@GOODMEALTASTESGOOD8 сағат бұрын
Boss, don’t make it a huge issue. If you disagree, say you disagree, but don’t need to go on a war against Dr. Dushyant ji. Please practice this level of aggression and activism in getting all Brahmins vote on the election date. Don’t attack a soft target and prove like you are so successful.
@OurTemples8 сағат бұрын
Hey nameless bastard. What's your problem. How is the publishing views of different scholars on a topic a problem. Those of you who don't have the guts to use your real name who are ashamed to use your real name must just off from here
@GOODMEALTASTESGOOD4 сағат бұрын
@@OurTemplesSir, please mind your language. Didn’t expect this kind of a language from a channel intending to support sanatana dharma and temples. This shows your true stature. Argue, but don’t stoop down. All that I’m saying is Dushyant ji is doing something at his capacity with good intentions. If there are differences, we should discuss and resolve, rather than waging a hate campaign against him through your channel. We have bigger things to achieve for Sanatana dharma than waging internal wars.
@username927074 сағат бұрын
They are pulling out bricks from the Foundation,Valmiki Ramayana. The House will be gone in Time! What “bigger thing is left to Achieve in sanatana dharma”
@GOODMEALTASTESGOOD2 сағат бұрын
@@username92707 Rangarajan swami is an uncompromising fighter unlike me who is a keyboard warrior. My only concern is his energy should not be directed inward at co-sanathanis. Rather towards the Dravidian stock.
@kgdhouhithri8 сағат бұрын
It's a brilliant move by Sri Rangarajan Swami to do an English educational video with such a pious, dignified, knowledgeable Swami from Sri Maadhva Sampradayam. As that questionable book is in English, this will help neutral [and hopefully, even biased] minds to think through this. Adiyen shared this with a Telugu Smartha friend of mine. ❤🙏🏽
@svradhakrishnansirugamani54238 сағат бұрын
नूनं व्याकरणं कृत्स्नमनेन बहुधा श्रुतम् बहु व्याहरताऽनेन न किञ्चिदपशब्दितम्
Beautiful conversation ❤🙏🏽 Really very educational and inspiring 🙏🏽🌹🌹🌹 Dhanyasmi Dhanyasmi Dhanyasmi is all adiyen can manage to say ❤🙏🏽
@rengarajanvenkatesan17529 сағат бұрын
Perfect advice to dhushyanth. Pravachanam should be for elevating people and they should not get drowned by using cheap words to capture attention and become popular. Lord rama will not accept . Edha stress pannanum nu therinju pesanum. janaranjakam Koodathu
@nadadurmathavan30539 сағат бұрын
🙏In Ramayana, Sri Valmiki has a sloka (1.18.20) that mentions only the birth Month (Chitra), the Thithi (Navami), the Laganam (kataga) the Star (Punarvasu) and not the year! Also Sri Rama’s birth was mentioned as a divine incarnation of Sriman Narayana, the supreme god head (the Omni potent, the Omniscient ,and the Omnipresent). 🙏There are several references in the Vedic literature that Sri Rama’s birth happened during Treta Yuga of the Vedic cosmic cycle. Of the Ten well known Avathrams of Sriman Narayana, the first four (Matsa, Kurma, Varaha, Nrisimha, and Vamana) happened during Kritha Yuga. 5th and 6th (Parusurama and Rama) happened during Treta Yuga; 8th and 9th (Balarama and Krishna) happened during Dvapara Yuga. 🙏The 10th the Kali Bhagavan shall be incarnated during the current Kali Yuga comprising 0.432 million years of which we have JUST crossed around 5200 years (3200 years before CE and 2000 years after CE!!!!). 🙏The four Yugas (known as one chathur Yuga) Kritha, Treta, Dvapara and Kali constitute 4.32 million years. Modern science estimates our planet earth to be about 4.54 billion years old which corresponds to about 1000 chathur Yugas! 🙏Jyotisha is a Vedanga of Vedic literature and can be used in simulation models to analyze various aspects of time, dates and stars. Any one using any such simulation models should state the limitations of their simulated results. Especially in the cosmic cycle nature of the universe, there could be more than one incidence of coincidences may occur that will have to be explained in the results and discussion section of the research publication, if any. For example one such occurrences could be 7500 years (5500 BCE). This is the latest coincidence in Kali Yuga but not the all. So if the model has the capacity to simulate full cosmic chathur Yugas, then one can possibly find the earliest or the first occurrence to be in the Treta Yuga! 🙏So let us try to understand the scope and limitations of any such analytical tools to Vedic literature which are time eternal 🙏Sarvam Srikrishnarpanamasthu
@Jarjim598710 сағат бұрын
Idhukku neenga jayasree சரணதனையும் dushyanthaiyum naetkanal செய்தால் நல்லா இருக்கும் direct questions will fetch direct answers
@tharanathakula358810 сағат бұрын
Modi Has declared that he did not have a biological mother and was sent byGOD as a Messenger and people believe what is your take on this
@esakkimuthu464311 сағат бұрын
ஒரு வழியாக துஷ்யந்த் ஸ்வாமி மூலமாகவும் ராமாயணத்தை பல பேருக்கு தெளிவாக தெரிந்து கொள்ளவும் ஸ்ரீங்கம் ஸ்வாமி ரங்கராஜ் நரசிம்மனை லக்ஷ்மி நரசிம்மன் உள்ளிருந்து இயக்குகிறார் ஜெய் ஸ்ரீ லக்ஷ்மி நரசிம்மா
@mangalaranganathan944212 сағат бұрын
அருமையான சீரான வாதமும் ஏற்றுக் கொள்ளத்தக்க தாகவும் உள்ள வாதம். இதை ஸ்ரீ மான் ஜோசப் சுவாமியை தவிர வேறு யாராலும் தரமுடியாது.🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@rajagopalanthiruvengadatha925812 сағат бұрын
Sri Mathe Ramanujaya Namah: There must be several reasons why our own acharyas ("saints") like Swami Sri Ramanujacharya, Sri Adi Sankara and Sri Madhvacharya and all acharyas following them in their Sidhantham (philosophy) did not say anything about Perumal Shri Rama's birth (as 5000 odd BC) in any of their commentaries though they have written so many commentaries on Vedas and associated texts, as far as I have heard. These reasons must be best known to them only. We must therefore learn from our Gurus. What is important to us, is imbibing and adhering to Perumal Shri Rama's qualities in our daily life. Secondly, do we really need to prove scientifically about our bhakthi, faith and beliefs and about our Gods to non-believers? Answer is an emphatic "NO". I understand Swami Rangarajan Narasimhan has taken this initiative to educate all of us with accurate knowledge through experts on SriVaishnavam. Thanks to Swami Rangan ji and Swami Rangarajan. As Swamiji put it, do we have "GNANA" (knowledge) to time the timeless? Obviously, not.
@padhmajasatyamoorti768814 сағат бұрын
மேதைகளின் விளக்கங்கள் கேட்க கொடுத்து வைத்திருக்கிறோம்.... யானைக்கும் அடி சறுக்கும்... ஸ்ரீ துஷ்யந் ஸ்ரீதர் அவர்களை நம்மை போன்றவர்கள் கடுமையான சொற்களால் விமர்சிக்க கூடாது என்பது என் அபிப்ராயம். இளம் வயதில் அவரது ஆன்மீக சேவை மிகவும் அபாரம். நன்றி மறப்பது நன்றன்று. தெய்வீகம் யாரிடம் வெளிப்பட்டாலும் அவர்கள் போற்றுதற்குரியவர். துஷ்யந்த் ஸ்ரீதர் என்றுமே போற்றுதற்குரியவர்.
@Raj-zo3zi13 сағат бұрын
Absolutely agree. This is what i was worried about. Shri Rangarajan got totally opposite result (instead of working with DS to correct the views he divided us by going public about it). It is a failure to Sanadhanis like us. We should take Ramar's side not Rangarajan or DS side to degrade anyone. We need to salute Rangarajan Ji as well as DS ji.. We are nothing in front of them.. My namaskarams to all
@@Raj-zo3zi Thank you so much for your kind message. When sanatana dharma is being rediculed so badly within our country and grievous attempts are made at Harvard university level to extinguish Hinduism we all should stand united and these kind of forum must be done behind a closed door to bring in the right solution. To me Mr Rangarajan Narasimhan's approach to this matter in particular seems aiming at tarnishing Shri Dushyant Sridhar's fame. Hope the matter comes to an end soon. Ram Ram.
@OurTemples8 сағат бұрын
Fame?! What fame? Illgotten fame is fame?! Even EVR is famous. So? A person who speaks against Pramana is a Nasthik
@kgdhouhithri7 сағат бұрын
இது வரை இவ்வளவு பெரியோர்கள் தங்களது குருமார்களிடம் பெற்ற நல்ஞானத்தைப் பகிர்ந்துகொண்டுள்ளனர். இது குறித்து துஷ்யந்த் ஶ்ரீதர் அவர்கள் என்ன செய்துள்ளார்? தவறைத் திருத்த என்ன நடவடிக்கை எடுத்துள்ளார்? ஒன்றும் அறியாதவர் போல புத்தகத்தை விற்றுக்கொண்டிருப்பது எதற்கு?
@sudharshant316114 сағат бұрын
Not in this video, but in some other video: My suggestion: You mentioned the name of rajneesh while referring some spiritual matters. Please don't use his name.as He's not a spiritual teacher,sir.. Thanks Regards
@rajagopalanthiruvengadatha925816 сағат бұрын
Srimathe Ramanujaya Namah: Thoroughly enjoyed the question and answer session and intellectual debate/discussion. Human minds are limited. Science is created by human mind through observations. Obvious to state that we cannot observe, determine and perceive everything.. Our guiding principle is Sampradhya as taught to us by our elders. I agree with the views of Shri Keshava Rao. Thanks to Shri Rangarajan Swami.
@anuraggup607616 сағат бұрын
One soul harvesting charlatan is advising another spiritual commoditizing charlatan from the same pedigree, what a mockery buncum
@OurTemples8 сағат бұрын
And you dimwit thinks you are intelligent. What a joke
@vasudevanlj78316 сағат бұрын
When Muslims are going on spree on Sar Tan Se Juda and Sanatana Dharma is in danger with 6% Hindus converted to other Abrahamic Religions Sri Rangarajan Narasimhan is creating unnecessary debates to prove his points. He is a Schizophrenic. Jealous on young people delivering Upanyasams to attract ignorant Hindu youth to know about Ramayanam. He is much to destroy the population of HINDUS. He thinks he alone can fight for the cause of Hindutva. Even big Organisations like Hindu Mahasabha, RSS are finding it difficult to protect the Hindu flock. He thinks he alone can fight for Hindus cause. What's his contribution. We need a movement to achieve the objective. He is a real pain. Is he an authority on Hinduism.
@boomadevi866216 сағат бұрын
Jai sitaram
@sridharc398516 сағат бұрын
ராமர் நவமியில் பிறந்தார் என்றால், எந்த நவமியில் பிறந்தார் என்பதுதான் கேள்வி. ஏழாயிரம் வருடங்களுக்கு முன்பா, அல்லது ஏழாயிரம் வருடங்களுக்கு முன்பா?
@anandhisethuraman431216 сағат бұрын
Why didn't you point out and atleast send an objection when Sri Rama was insulted by A.Rasa.ivalavu perum oru thadavai kooda vayai thirakkavillai.thappu panniyirukkalam . Being educated, knowledgeable persons u all can correct him by Hithopadesam.Dr,Ranganji Is pointing his mistakes in a polished way. That's correct way.
@OurTemples8 сағат бұрын
What were you doing? Plucking flowers? And you decide what i must do is it?! Funk off