Terimakasih atan penjelasannya yang luar biasa 😊

Schein emphasizes that the underlying assumptions, those unspoken beliefs, are the true drivers of an organization's culture. They are powerful and complex to change, ultimately defining how a company functions. By analyzing these underlying assumptions, you gain a deeper understanding than just the surface-level structure or metaphors for organization. You see the core values and beliefs that shape the company's operations.

Thank you so much, this was valuable explanation which which brought about great understanding of the model

the language shapes our behaviour!! thanks for your video, it was excellent!

Ave learned alot👏🏾

That's good

Thanks 4 ⭐️ Video! Great 5F Theory!! Reality recheck!!! In short, the problem with these "Theories" is that most people believe in them as being Science & Natur Forces!!!! Only theory existing working 90% correct is Einstein, the rest is as true as trowing Dices = Chances 😎still itvwas mention as Government = Influence / Corrupt and 😅 and 2nd as important "Chances" 😂 which is Exactly my given po(.)nt👍 And here we have future Accountants telling US All how they world should look like, and it's Main Factors are Government (less) Control or 🧊 Chance = Advanced Chaos Theory would be a better world, and it does actually exist 👋 Still, Thanks 4 Great Video and Great (AC) Theory!!

very nicely explained, thank you

This is the most clear on point presentation

Typo at 14:48. Please fix.

How does theory affect staff retention

Thank you a lot I've found this vid is helpfull. Pray for me to have great grades in my exams.

Thank you a lot I've found this vid is helpfull. Pray for me to have great grades in my exams.

Thank you a lot I've found this vid is helpfull. Pray for me to have great grades in my exams.

Thank you a lot I've found this vid is helpfull. Pray for me to have great grades in my exams.

Amazing video. Thank you so much.

Thank you so much, is there a survey that uses this theory?

A bored speech

Thanks for sharing

Professor recommended this video for a quick rundown of the Kraljic matrix and this is amazing! Thank you!

amazing video

This video really helped me . ❤

Best ❤

❤ great explanation

Is flairclough's analysis based on language and power in advertisement ?

🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 📘 *Introduction to VRIO Analysis* - Introduction to the concept of VRIO analysis by J.B. Barney. - Origins and publication details of the VRIO model. - Basic overview of resource-based theory and its focus on internal characteristics for competitive advantage. 00:42 🔄 *VRIO vs. Porter's Five Forces* - Comparison between VRIO analysis and Porter's Five Forces. - Emphasis on internal vs. external factors in assessing performance and profit potential. - Introduction to the basic concepts of VRIO: resources, capabilities, and sustainable competitive advantage. 01:38 📊 *VRIO Model Components* - Explanation of the VRIO acronym and its evaluation dimensions. - Detailed description of the horizontal dimensions assessing competitive situations. 03:36 🔍 *Detailed Analysis of VRIO Elements* - Deep dive into the four vertical VRIO elements: Valuable, Rare, Inimitable, Organized. - Examples and questions to assess each element's contribution to competitive advantage. 06:22 🛠️ *Performing VRIO Analysis Steps* - Step-by-step guide on conducting a VRIO analysis. - Instructions on finding, defining, and analyzing resources to assess competitive advantages. 11:51 🚗 *Toyota VRIO Analysis Example* - Application of the VRIO analysis on Toyota's brand and resources. - Assessment of Toyota's core competencies, strengths, and areas of competitive parity and advantage. 15:04 🆚 *Comparison and Criticism* - Comparison between Porter's Value Chain Analysis and Barney's VRIO Analysis. - Criticism of the VRIO model and its empirical challenges. - Discussion on the strengths of the VRIO analysis in organizational resource focus and improvement areas. Made with HARPA AI

I’m just finding out about this model now. Thanks

Можно перевод на казахский язык

Your Vidoe guides me through my next Exam ❤

Lovely video. Clear explanation nice breakdown, really cool that you go with the pros and cons and overall an interessting video to watch. Thank´s for the work

Very helpful video

Thanks a lot. I'm from Syria. Is there a written copy of this explanation?

Sir Edgar you have explained to.me very well the models in a simplified manner and easy to understand. Why not subscribe? Thank you very much. Love from UGANDA the pearl of AFRICA

Is a good explication for motivational factors in employment. We had this theory at Academic study modul and it was very helpfull for a long time vision on future carriere and setting of the work place physical and envriormental. Whan one have understood that , than it know better its own direction for future profitability and outcomes. Some people lack this knowlwdge and they strive to be where they are not wanted.

Thank you so much for your explanation. I have a quick question: if the buyer's demand increases, in this case how the following forces will be The threat of new entrants = ( Low or High or Medium)? Threat of substitutes = ( Low or High or Medium)? Rivalry among existing companies = ( Low or High or Medium)? Bargaining power of buyers = ( Low or High or Medium)? Bargaining power of suppliers = ( Low or High or Medium)? By your explanation, I figured out that rivalry among existing will be (Lower). But what about the other forces?

very potatolikey... i wanna graduate potatoplese

Summary: Dynamic Capabilities of Firms by David Teece and Gary Pisano Background: David J. Teece is a Professor at the University of California, and Gary Pisano is a Professor at Harvard Business School. They introduced the "Appropriability Regimes" model which explains how companies can prevent their innovations from being easily copied by competitors. Appropriability Regimes Model: Appropriability combines the concepts of property and replicability. It looks at the ease of replication of innovations and how effective intellectual property rights are at preventing imitation. The model has two main categories: Inherent Replicability (how easy/hard it is to imitate a product/service). Intellectual Property Rights (the strength of patents, trademarks, etc., which can be loose or tight). Four fields result from these categories, indicating if a firm's innovations are weak, moderate, or strong in protection: Weak: Easy to copy with loose intellectual property rights. Moderate (First Type): Difficult to copy, but with loose intellectual property rights. Moderate (Second Type): Easy to copy, but with strong intellectual property rights. Strong: Difficult to copy and protected by strong intellectual property rights. Examples: Weak Field: Standard clothes without trademarks or common industrial screws. First Moderate Field: IKEA's unique logistics system, or online platforms like Amazon and Alibaba that possess hard-to-imitate knowledge about their customers. Second Moderate Field: Pfizer's patented drugs, Apple and Lego's strong trademarks. Strong Field: Pfizer and Apple's research and development prowess, or IKEA's ownership of prime real estate. Strategic Dimensions of Firms: Teece and Pisano argue that firms need dynamic capabilities and categorize them under three strategic dimensions: Organizational and Managerial Processes: Integration: Coordination within and outside the company. Learning: Improvement via repetition and experimentation. Reconfiguration and Transformation: Adapting to changing environments faster than competitors. Position: Four assets: Technological (know-how and patents), Complementary (distribution channels, service capability), Financial (cash position, balance sheet), and Locational (geographic advantages). Paths: Past, present, and future routes a firm takes, influenced by fixed costs, core rigidities, and technological opportunities. Criticism: The model doesn't clearly define what qualifies as "loose" or "tight" in terms of intellectual property rights or clarify when replication is deemed easy or hard. It doesn't specify the competencies a company should acquire or the direction to pursue. The only clear advice is that doing nothing leads to a company's decline. In essence, the Dynamic Capabilities model emphasizes that firms need to innovate continuously and adapt to changing market environments to remain competitive. While the model provides a framework for understanding these dynamics, it has been critiqued for lacking specifics.

Do you have a video translation for hindi subtitle comments?

informative ands insightful video. It helps me in my Post Grad presentation. Shukran Jazilan.

This is complete garbage salad.

Wow, I'm surprised at the dog example for Samsung watches 😮

Excellent thanks

Very lucid explanation..

The title of the article that John Kotter wrote in 1995 was "Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail". In which he mentioned, Error 1: "Not Establishing a Great Enough Sense of Urgency", Error 2: Not creating ... Error 3: Lacking a vision and so on. I personally prefer this pre-mortem like approach to the "positive" thinking one. In other words, use any model you like but pay attention to Kotter's - negatives.

Super helpful! Thank you!

Thank you. it's very useful.

Very very helpful, thanks 👍

Thank you

It was so difficult to understand such a theory from a real book and it may take longer time to be done. In contrast, your vedio makes it easy to understand and so interesting to watch because of the profeciency of your performance.

Can you suggest books to read or references I can cite from this video?